ဤအပိုင်းအကြောင်း
(Initially written for the LW Wiki, but then I realized it was looking more like a post instead.)
In 1895, the physicist Ignaz Robert Schütz, who worked as an assistant to the more eminent physicist Ludwig Boltzmann, wondered if our observed universe had simply assembled by a random fluctuation of order from a universe otherwise in thermal equilibrium. The idea was published by Boltzmann in 1896, properly credited to Schütz, and has been associated with Boltzmann ever since.
The obvious objection to this scenario is credited to Arthur Eddington in 1931: If all order is due to random fluctuations, comparatively small moments of order will exponentially-vastly outnumber even slightly larger fluctuations toward order, to say nothing of fluctuations the size of our entire observed universe! If this is where order comes from, we should find ourselves inside much smaller ordered systems.
Feynman similarly later observed: Even if we fill a box of gas with white and black atoms bouncing randomly, and after an exponentially vast amount of time the white and black atoms on one side randomly sort themselves into two neat sides separated by color, the other half of the box will still be in expectation randomized. If [...]
---
First published:
May 16th, 2026
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/v8MSczS3CuoqMmTFw/a-relatively-brief-explanation-of-boltzmann-brains
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
In 1895, the physicist Ignaz Robert Schütz, who worked as an assistant to the more eminent physicist Ludwig Boltzmann, wondered if our observed universe had simply assembled by a random fluctuation of order from a universe otherwise in thermal equilibrium. The idea was published by Boltzmann in 1896, properly credited to Schütz, and has been associated with Boltzmann ever since.
The obvious objection to this scenario is credited to Arthur Eddington in 1931: If all order is due to random fluctuations, comparatively small moments of order will exponentially-vastly outnumber even slightly larger fluctuations toward order, to say nothing of fluctuations the size of our entire observed universe! If this is where order comes from, we should find ourselves inside much smaller ordered systems.
Feynman similarly later observed: Even if we fill a box of gas with white and black atoms bouncing randomly, and after an exponentially vast amount of time the white and black atoms on one side randomly sort themselves into two neat sides separated by color, the other half of the box will still be in expectation randomized. If [...]
---
First published:
May 16th, 2026
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/v8MSczS3CuoqMmTFw/a-relatively-brief-explanation-of-boltzmann-brains
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
အင်္ဂလိပ်
အမေရိကန်ပြည်ထောင်စု
ဤအပိုင်းထဲတွင်
ကူးယူချက် 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
ပြီးခဲ့သည့် အပိုင်းများကို ရှာဖွေပါ
LessWrong (Curated & Popular) ၏ ယခင်အပိုင်းများကို ရှာဖွေပါ
ဤ PODCAST တွင် အခြားသော အပိုင်းများ
TL;DR: Increasingly when you interact with frontier models, your prompt doesn't only contain the words on the page, but also a lot of what you've ever publicly written online. This is not intended to be a scary post. And I'm not going to suggest that you self-censor (and honestly, by…
I think “On Social Reality in China” makes many accurate observations, but I find the comparison fundamentally uneven. There are already many interesting comments there, but they’re too scattered, so I’m starting a separate post to respond in a more systematic and comprehensive way. The most critic…
Authors: Axel Højmark*, Ezra Newman* (*Equal contribution) While reviewing transcripts from standard behavioral evaluations of GLM-5.3, we noticed that the model occasionally reasons, unprompted, about how its actions will shape future models. It appears to consider that its outputs might be used f…
What would it take to get assurance that we have actually explained a neuron? Certainly, it would be a good sign if neuron activations looked like they had a consistent pattern, and a bad sign if they looked like a random jumble of unrelated concepts. Nick Cammarata's recent post makes an impo…
This is an extremely lengthy post by Nick Cammarata.
Author's summary on twitter:
interpretability might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now, as I don't think we can solve alignment if we don't know what we're building. I think I have good news abo…
မသက်ဆိုင်ကြောင်းရှင်းလင်းချက်: ဤစာမျက်နှာပေါ်တွင် ထည့်သွင်းထားသော ပေါ့တ်ကာစ်နှင့် အနုပညာလက်ရာများသည် ၎င်း၏ပိုင်ရှင်၏ပိုင်ဆိုင်မှုဖြစ်သည့် LessWrong မှဖြစ်ပြီး Listen Notes, Inc နှင့် ဆက်နွှယ်ခြင်း သို့မဟုတ် ထောက်ခံထားခြင်းမရှိပါ။
ပြင်ဆင်ပါ
ပေါ့ဒ်ကတ်စ် ဒေတာဘေ့စ်ကို နောက်ဆုံးပေါ်အချိန်နှင့်တပြေးညီဖြစ်စေရန် ကူညီပေးသည့်အတွက် ကျေးဇူးတင်ပါသည်။