LW - Sum-threshold attacks by TsviBT

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Sum-threshold attacks, published by TsviBT on September 8, 2023 on LessWrong.
How do you affect something far away, a lot, without anyone noticing?
(Note: you can safely skip sections. It is also safe to skip the essay entirely, or to read the whole thing backwards if you like.)
The frog's lawsuit
Attorney for the defendant: "So, Mr. Frog. You allege that my client caused you grievous bodily harm. How is it that you claim he harmed you?"
Frog: "Ribbit RIBbit ribbit."
Attorney: "Sir..."
Frog: "Just kidding. Well, I've been living in a pan for the past two years. When I started, I was the picture of health, and at first everything was fine. But over the course of the last six months, something changed. By last month, I was in the frog hospital with life-threatening third-degree burns."
Attorney: "And could you repeat what you told the jury about the role my client is alleged to have played in your emerging medical problems?"
Frog: "Like I said, I don't know exactly. But I know that when my owner wasn't away on business, every day he'd do something with the stove my pan was sitting on. And then my home would seem to be a bit hotter, always a bit hotter."
Attorney: "Your owner? You mean to say..."
Judge: "Let the record show that Mr. Frog is extending his tongue, indicating the defendant, Mr. Di'Alturner."
Attorney: "Let me ask you this, Mr. Frog. Is it right to say that my client - - your owner - - lives in an area with reasonably varied weather? It's not uncommon for the temperature to vary by ten degrees over the course of the day?"
Frog: "True."
Attorney: "And does my client leave windows open in his house?"
Frog: "He does."
Attorney: "So I wonder, how is it that you can tell that a slight raise in temperature that you experience - - small, by your own admission - - how can you be sure that it's due to my client operating his stove, and not due to normal fluctuations in the ambient air temperature?"
Frog: "I can tell because of the correlation. I tend to feel a slight warming after he's twiddled the dial."
Attorney: "Let me rephrase my question. Is there any single instance you can point to, where you can be sure - - beyond a reasonable doubt - - that the warming was due to my client's actions?"
Frog: "Ah, um, it's not that I'm sure that any one increase in temperature is because he turned the dial, but..."
Attorney: "Thank you. And would it be fair to say that you have no professional training in discerning temperature and changes thereof?"
Frog: "That would be accurate."
Attorney: "And are you aware that 30% of frogs in your state report spontaneous slight temperature changes at least once a month?"
Frog: "But this wasn't once a month, it was every day for weeks at a ti - - "
Attorney: "Sir, please only answer the questions I ask you. Were you aware of that fact?"
Frog: "No, I wasn't aware of that, but I don't see wh - - "
Attorney: "Thank you. Now, you claim that you were harmed by my client's actions, which somehow put you into a situation where you became injured."
Frog: "¡I have third degree burns all ov - - "
Attorney: "Yes, we've seen the exhibits, but I'll remind you to only speak in response to a question I ask you. What I'd like to ask you is this: Why didn't you just leave the frying pan? If you were, as you allege, being grievously injured, wasn't that enough reason for you to remove yourself from that situation?"
Frog: "I, I didn't notice that it was happening at the time, each change was so subtle, but..."
Attorney: "Thank you. As your counsel would have advised you, the standard for grievous bodily harm requires intent. Now are we really expected to conclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, that my client intended to cause you harm, via a method that you didn't even notice? That even though you can't point to so much as a single instance where my ...