WEBVTT
00:00:08.273 --> 00:00:17.564
Hello and welcome to the Keystone Concepts in Teaching podcast where we share impactful and evidence based teaching practices to support all students and faculty.
00:00:17.925 --> 00:00:39.034
My name is Kelly Chandler and I am the Programs Administrator for the Stearns Center for Teaching and Learning at George Mason University and Producer for the Keystone Concepts in Teaching podcast Prior to my position at the Stearns Center, I taught first year writing courses and developmental writing as an adjunct professor at community colleges for four and a half years.
00:00:39.725 --> 00:00:45.755
For this episode, I am also your guest host in the first episode of our Hear From Your Host series.
00:00:46.405 --> 00:00:51.329
For these special episodes, we'll turn the tables and listeners will get to Hear From Your Host, Dr.
00:00:51.329 --> 00:00:54.895
Rachel Yoho, about keystone concepts and teaching.
00:00:55.475 --> 00:00:55.784
Dr.
00:00:55.784 --> 00:00:59.634
Yoho is the Assistant Director in the Stearns Center for Teaching and Learning.
00:00:59.984 --> 00:01:05.055
She is also a faculty affiliate in the Department of Environmental Science and Policy.
00:01:05.954 --> 00:01:06.305
Dr.
00:01:06.305 --> 00:01:15.981
Yoho and I will discuss the course syllabus and how we can make our syllabus work better to support everyone in the space, including the students and you as the instructor.
00:01:18.090 --> 00:01:22.061
So, let's start with discussing the purpose of the syllabus.
00:01:22.381 --> 00:01:28.599
Rachel, can you tell us about the potential multiple roles or purposes of the syllabus?
00:01:29.296 --> 00:01:33.147
So when we're talking about our syllabus, we have a number of things.
00:01:33.147 --> 00:01:36.906
The syllabus is sort of a legal document, but not really.
00:01:37.406 --> 00:01:39.387
And it's sort of an organizational tool.
00:01:39.662 --> 00:01:44.341
Well, it's mostly an organizational tool, and it's also sort of a means of communication.
00:01:44.691 --> 00:01:49.762
And so when we think about the purposes of our syllabus, we have lots of things going on.
00:01:50.132 --> 00:02:02.319
We're not talking about the syllabus as a contract or a legal contract because it's not really but it is sort of that planning for the semester and planning for what's going to happen in the course.
00:02:02.480 --> 00:02:03.061
Right.
00:02:03.061 --> 00:02:11.539
Some of the things that we don't think about as often with the syllabus is that the syllabus is also a public course description.
00:02:11.849 --> 00:02:20.509
It's that public face of what's going to happen in our course and something that we especially need to be thinking about or might be wanting to think about at a state institution.
00:02:20.794 --> 00:02:26.384
We also have uses and, you know, I was a graduate program director at my previous institution.
00:02:26.724 --> 00:02:33.215
Some of the uses that we might also think about a little bit less often are things like transfer and equivalency.
00:02:33.235 --> 00:02:40.741
So determining especially for transfer students, what could be used, what they took at a previous institution, what meets different requirements.
00:02:41.151 --> 00:02:51.002
So really, we see a lot of things going on, and I think that's really where we're looking at how do we balance all of this and also make it not 75 pages long.
00:02:51.847 --> 00:02:52.956
Yes, absolutely.
00:02:52.956 --> 00:02:55.556
I would say I was a little guilty of that.
00:02:55.586 --> 00:02:57.086
Maybe not 75 pages.
00:02:57.597 --> 00:03:08.953
Because you just get to a point where a student will try something new that you weren't expecting before and next thing you know you're like,"Ope, now I gotta put that in my syllabus." Just keeps getting longer and longer and longer.
00:03:09.698 --> 00:03:14.288
Oh, you can definitely see those you look at someone else's syllabus like,"Oh, that happened, huh?"
00:03:14.603 --> 00:03:15.532
Exactly.
00:03:16.532 --> 00:03:25.353
But I'm really interested in what we're saying here about how the syllabus can support both learners and the instructors.
00:03:25.763 --> 00:03:28.112
So what are some ways that this can be accomplished?
00:03:28.473 --> 00:03:34.980
Yeah, so when we're talking about our syllabus, it's a great way to have that first impression space for the students.
00:03:34.980 --> 00:03:36.610
You know, what will this course be like?
00:03:36.890 --> 00:03:38.591
What's this instructor like?
00:03:38.871 --> 00:03:41.070
And what can the students expect during the semester?
00:03:41.100 --> 00:03:47.471
Not just what they're going to do and when they're going to do it, but also, what's it going to be like working with Dr.
00:03:47.471 --> 00:03:50.001
Yoho over this, you know, number of weeks?
00:03:50.580 --> 00:04:14.049
And so, through the syllabus, we can use this as a document, as a tangible way to show our approach to teaching, what we value, how we're looking to support our students through their learning experiences, and highlight other student focused efforts, because as we're doing this, you know, we want it obviously to be a space for all of us, so planning is important.
00:04:14.248 --> 00:04:18.488
And so overall, the syllabus really is that essential learning tool.
00:04:18.519 --> 00:04:20.309
We're outlining expectations.
00:04:20.309 --> 00:04:21.738
We're directing student effort.
00:04:22.028 --> 00:04:27.809
We're also directing our effort and our timelines and our feedback and grading, all of that.
00:04:28.088 --> 00:04:33.988
And so overall, we're really looking at how we articulate the course goals and the learning progression.
00:04:33.999 --> 00:04:43.903
You know, here we've really shifted away from sort of that university business side of the syllabus and really get into the educational purposes with our syllabus.
00:04:44.519 --> 00:04:50.995
Absolutely, I hear you on that balancing act of taking care of our students, of course, with our syllabus, but also ourselves.
00:04:51.636 --> 00:05:04.249
So it seems like you were already kind of approaching this, but I want to ask a pointed question of what are some of the kind of core areas of a syllabus where we can focus on inclusive approaches?
00:05:04.834 --> 00:05:16.624
There are a lot of different areas that we can certainly think about and look at, but a few of those that I want to talk about right now are thinking about our course policies, as well as our readings and resources.
00:05:17.053 --> 00:05:20.874
And the course policies, for instance, might be things that we automatically go to.
00:05:20.894 --> 00:05:28.987
That's probably one of the sections that our students, if they look at the syllabus, are jumping right to what's the late policy, for instance.
00:05:29.362 --> 00:05:29.932
Oh, yeah.
00:05:31.346 --> 00:05:34.846
But some of our policies, we might be thinking about the workload.
00:05:35.117 --> 00:05:37.326
That's both for our students and ourselves.
00:05:37.326 --> 00:05:39.826
Again, that grading, the feedback, the timelines.
00:05:40.326 --> 00:05:55.466
But we also, of course, might be thinking about the late policy, and there's a number of ways we might be looking at, and we've mentioned in some of our earlier episodes, different approaches to late policies, the Life Happens Pass was mentioned in one of our first episodes by Dr.
00:05:55.466 --> 00:05:56.226
Shelley Reid.
00:05:56.766 --> 00:06:06.223
But we might also be thinking about some of our policies around, for instance, holidays, like different dates, how we schedule our course, as well as things like religious observances.
00:06:06.244 --> 00:06:14.041
So, for instance, George Mason University puts out a calendar, so we can keep in mind different major holidays for different religions.
00:06:14.632 --> 00:06:17.692
But we also might be thinking about the modality of our course.
00:06:17.692 --> 00:06:19.581
We might be thinking about individual needs.
00:06:19.932 --> 00:06:26.526
If we're teaching an online synchronous course, so something on Zoom, we might be thinking about camera policies.
00:06:26.526 --> 00:06:33.526
You know, not every bit of engagement perhaps needs to be people staring into a camera, but maybe there are other ways to contribute.
00:06:33.915 --> 00:06:53.262
Or we might think about caregiving needs or chronic illness or things like that of how we look at building in flexibility or building in understanding, just awareness that we're all people in these spaces and things happen not only for us but also for our students and how we can approach our course policies from that sort of understanding.
00:06:53.851 --> 00:06:57.999
But really here it's looking at how we might demonstrate our values and our approaches.
00:06:58.009 --> 00:07:04.059
So that might be openness or flexibility or communication, any of those types of things.
00:07:05.119 --> 00:07:11.624
I want to ask, along these same lines, I've seen some talk about tone in syllabus.
00:07:11.634 --> 00:07:16.084
Is this kind of related to that flexibility and policy writing?
00:07:16.444 --> 00:07:18.923
How might we work that into our syllabus?
00:07:19.004 --> 00:07:20.553
What do they mean when they say tone?
00:07:21.189 --> 00:07:21.978
Absolutely.
00:07:21.978 --> 00:07:32.718
I think tone is probably one of the most important things that we can think about in our syllabus and we can work on without actually changing content.
00:07:33.149 --> 00:07:41.055
So, essentially, when we're talking about tone or language, we're considering what's being said as well as how it's being said.
00:07:41.055 --> 00:07:48.389
And so again, this is a great way to demonstrate our commitment to shared values, to our students' learning and create a really nice atmosphere.
00:07:48.778 --> 00:07:54.658
And so some examples of this are considering the balance between warm and cold language use.
00:07:55.079 --> 00:08:11.269
So there's some great examples here that we' ll be sharing the resources and the sources in the show notes, but some examples of cold language, for instance, would be things like,"If you need to contact me outside of class..." That definitely may have the underlying,"Don't contact me."
00:08:11.995 --> 00:08:12.444
Yeah
00:08:12.444 --> 00:08:14.115
Maybe that's not what we mean.
00:08:14.134 --> 00:08:15.074
Please don't mean that.
00:08:16.309 --> 00:08:27.478
We might warm that up a little bit with,"I welcome you to contact me outside of class," or something like,"When you need assistance, I encourage you to contact me in these ways." Anything like that.
00:08:27.879 --> 00:08:45.698
Or we have another example like,"Late work will be penalized by 50%." That's a lot, but we can warm that up and say the exact same thing by saying that"Late work is still eligible for 50 percent partial credit." So it's exactly the same content.
00:08:45.719 --> 00:08:47.599
Like, we didn't change the policy in any way.
00:08:47.599 --> 00:08:49.629
It's just how it's being said.
00:08:49.759 --> 00:08:50.210
Mm.
00:08:50.529 --> 00:08:51.289
That makes sense.
00:08:51.764 --> 00:08:55.455
And the tone thing also works for all caps[capitals] writing.
00:08:55.475 --> 00:08:58.894
You know, there are different ways to bring attention to words.
00:08:58.904 --> 00:09:03.634
So that's, you know, bold or underlining or italics or, you know, any of these things.
00:09:03.682 --> 00:09:14.381
All caps writing, especially for people who are very online, in different spaces and social media and things, all caps writing is generally understood as like shouting or yelling.
00:09:14.971 --> 00:09:21.162
And so, avoiding all caps writing, like, we don't need to yell our policies at our students, even metaphorically.
00:09:21.662 --> 00:09:27.792
But, you know, maybe we look at underlining, or putting something in bold that we want to particularly highlight.
00:09:28.312 --> 00:09:29.072
Right.
00:09:29.072 --> 00:09:34.392
And I think at one point you were talking about inclusive approaches for readings.
00:09:34.432 --> 00:09:35.302
You had mentioned that.
00:09:35.471 --> 00:09:37.621
Did you want to speak more to what you were saying there?
00:09:38.221 --> 00:09:39.312
Yeah, absolutely.
00:09:39.562 --> 00:09:55.586
You know, when we're thinking about our readings and our resources, those can often feel like a pretty stagnant thing unless we're like,"Okay, I'm redoing the whole course." And essentially, we might be asking ourselves, whose voices are being heard and whose voices are not being heard?
00:09:56.067 --> 00:10:02.647
Does the course content represent a diversity of voices in any number of aspects of diversity, of course?
00:10:02.796 --> 00:10:06.025
So we might be looking at incorporating some other ways.
00:10:06.025 --> 00:10:12.995
Certainly not just continually adding to our readings, like that's not good for anyone, including, uh, us.
00:10:13.475 --> 00:10:28.495
But we might have different ways to highlight current practitioners in the field, or we might bring in a video, we might bring in something else during class, or might have these conversations with our students of whose voices are typically heard and whose voices are less heard.
00:10:28.995 --> 00:10:45.755
But also as we think about the readings and the resources, we might also be looking at the cost of textbooks, for instance, or the cost of software access, or whatever the thing is in your course to purchase.
00:10:46.145 --> 00:11:01.225
And so open access materials, or really just thinking about the accessibility of different resources or content can be really useful and a great way to make this space more accessible to everyone.
00:11:02.102 --> 00:11:02.812
Absolutely.
00:11:02.863 --> 00:11:03.413
I love that.
00:11:03.423 --> 00:11:11.153
I will never forget my first year at university, I had to purchase your typical Biology 101 book.
00:11:11.243 --> 00:11:24.822
It was huge, heavy, and then at the end of the semester, when I went back to the bookstore to resell it, because that's something you used to do back then, they were willing to offer me one cent, literally.
00:11:24.883 --> 00:11:25.783
One penny.
00:11:25.852 --> 00:11:33.418
When we had paid, I think, over 200 dollars for the book, because the next semester was going to be a new edition of that book.
00:11:33.479 --> 00:11:36.328
So mine was rendered useless.
00:11:36.479 --> 00:11:38.129
That was whew.
00:11:38.369 --> 00:11:39.119
Interesting.
00:11:39.547 --> 00:11:51.308
So I wanted to kind of switch gears a little bit here and then talk about one of the things students are also most worried about, so what about the activities and assignments?
00:11:51.318 --> 00:11:59.298
How might we include these in our syllabus in a way that supports both, you know, students and instructors?
00:12:00.136 --> 00:12:06.321
Yeah, that's another area our students are often probably likely to look at within the syllabus.
00:12:06.730 --> 00:12:09.360
And so we might be thinking about things like discussions.
00:12:09.390 --> 00:12:24.725
We might be especially considering the added importance and the extra focus on civil discourse and what's being said and what's going on and free speech and things we're not going to solve today.
00:12:25.245 --> 00:12:37.534
But we might be thinking about how we work with our students, and especially to cocreate some discussion ground rules, or classroom guidelines, or community expectations, or they're all the same thing, no matter what you want to call them there.
00:12:38.264 --> 00:12:41.134
But we can review those, certainly, with our students.
00:12:41.134 --> 00:12:52.625
We can use that kind of structure to intervene when we need to jump in during a, for instance, a live class discussion, or even if we're teaching fully asynchronous online.
00:12:52.769 --> 00:12:55.909
Even jump in on a discussion board post, for instance.
00:12:55.960 --> 00:13:07.129
And so this might be an area where we are designing assignments that the students could have a little bit more choice, a little bit more autonomy in terms of a specific topic or focus area.
00:13:07.620 --> 00:13:18.325
We might also in certain cases, certainly not across the board, but we might have the ability, on specific activities to have different types of content submissions.
00:13:18.725 --> 00:13:24.075
So having a little bit more agency for the students in terms of how they demonstrate their learning.
00:13:24.325 --> 00:13:43.215
So again, not across everything, but maybe in one or two activities in the course, they have the option to do, you know, X or Y activity, or they can, for instance, they might write, a paper of X amount of length, or they might create a video of Y duration, something like that.
00:13:43.365 --> 00:13:57.855
But also with our activities or even our examples, in some of our lectures or our content, we might think about and we might look at some of the names or the terms that are used in those, so like whose names are being used, whose names are not being used.
00:13:57.875 --> 00:14:02.095
Not our students names, but example people in, in activities, for instance.
00:14:02.095 --> 00:14:05.004
We might also think about how we look at our terms.
00:14:05.004 --> 00:14:07.544
Are we using the same word consistently?
00:14:08.044 --> 00:14:10.634
Especially for multilingual learners.
00:14:10.725 --> 00:14:17.735
changing up how we say the same thing, just to make it more vocally interesting is not a great instructional approach.
00:14:17.735 --> 00:14:26.134
So consistency in our terms, not only in our syllabus, but then in our discussion, our lecture recordings, live lectures, whatever that looks like.
00:14:26.715 --> 00:14:31.274
But also we could just talk to a colleague or get some student feedback on some of these things as well.
00:14:31.984 --> 00:14:35.774
The other one I will mention here is thinking about group work.
00:14:35.803 --> 00:14:46.307
Group work is such a challenge for everyone, but we can do a few things to help our students because working with others is incredibly important.
00:14:46.506 --> 00:14:55.509
I can't think of many professions where you don't have to work with other people, and it's just a good life skill anyway, And so the ways we can scaffold the group work.
00:14:55.509 --> 00:15:06.850
So thinking about how we help the students interact with each other, how we help them interact productively, and also having some check ins, some opportunities for feedback.
00:15:06.860 --> 00:15:17.529
You know, we don't want to get into those situations, which many instructors may have been in, in the past where you get to the end of the semester and you find out that group was wildly dysfunctional.
00:15:17.850 --> 00:15:19.139
And I didn't know it.
00:15:19.440 --> 00:15:19.809
Haha, yeah.
00:15:20.279 --> 00:15:24.970
And that's not where we want to be because that's not a good experience for anyone in the space.
00:15:25.210 --> 00:15:26.730
It's not a good learning experience.
00:15:26.740 --> 00:15:34.169
So the more we can check in that we facilitate the discussion with some guided questions and some structure can really help.
00:15:34.664 --> 00:15:35.384
Absolutely.
00:15:35.825 --> 00:15:51.813
If we're talking about syllabi supporting learners and instructors: whenever you are differentiating your assignments and giving those different options for how they can accomplish that assignment, I can hear some instructors thinking,"Well, that's extra work for me.
00:15:51.994 --> 00:16:00.267
Now I have to design three different assignments versus just one." What might be your response to someone who might be thinking that?
00:16:00.965 --> 00:16:04.345
Yeah, it's a great point, but I don't think we have to design three.
00:16:04.504 --> 00:16:15.764
So, for instance, we might give the students a prompt, you know, we might be saying, create a solution to this problem and provide evidence, whatever that looks like in your field.
00:16:16.215 --> 00:16:22.195
But you can demonstrate that, you can show, you can submit this using a number of different modalities.
00:16:22.195 --> 00:16:26.934
So, that could be the paper, that could be the infographic, that could be the video.
00:16:27.514 --> 00:16:29.774
But what's really key there are the bounds.
00:16:30.340 --> 00:16:35.389
It needs to be of this length, of this duration, of this level of detail, you know, anything like that.
00:16:35.440 --> 00:16:37.724
I've, you know, learned from my mistakes, folks.
00:16:37.883 --> 00:16:42.342
So that's really the key there, is having the options.
00:16:42.352 --> 00:16:46.732
So it doesn't have to be three different assignments, but just options for how they can submit it.
00:16:47.043 --> 00:16:56.013
And honestly, this is a great inclusive thing for us as the instructor because oh my goodness, it can make it so much more interesting to grade.
00:16:56.352 --> 00:17:00.003
Because we're not grading 50 of the exact same paper.
00:17:00.682 --> 00:17:02.734
Okay, hopefully they're not exactly the same.
00:17:03.037 --> 00:17:06.767
But, we're not grading 50 of the essentially same thing.
00:17:06.767 --> 00:17:11.353
That is boring, but if we're having the students, they can take more ownership.
00:17:11.553 --> 00:17:13.333
They can be a whole lot more interesting.
00:17:13.343 --> 00:17:16.232
They can be really engaging, which obviously isn't our goal.
00:17:16.232 --> 00:17:23.653
It's a good learning experience, but it's not a bad thing either to have the grading, have the experience be better for everyone.
00:17:24.478 --> 00:17:24.798
Right..
00:17:24.807 --> 00:17:32.038
And I think you would agree that what I don't hear you saying is that every single assignment has to have multiple options.
00:17:32.077 --> 00:17:39.271
This is something that you might do once, maybe twice, for one or maybe two assignments in a semester.
00:17:39.957 --> 00:17:44.457
Yeah, so the way I've done this before is a number of different activities through the semester.
00:17:44.457 --> 00:17:48.487
Let's say I had, maybe six, let's call it six different activities.
00:17:48.967 --> 00:17:59.047
In each of them I might have something different, so it might be they're writing, whatever the activity is, and they can choose a little bit on the topic, so I'll give them a few topics to choose among.
00:17:59.517 --> 00:18:07.136
Or in one or two activities, they might be able to do a video or a paper, something like that.
00:18:07.136 --> 00:18:13.563
So we're just doing little things here and there, and it creates a little variation, which is nice for everyone.
00:18:13.982 --> 00:18:19.282
But it's not a big thing, and this is a place to start with maybe one activity, like you said, Kelly.
00:18:19.292 --> 00:18:21.673
It's not, let's do all of them.
00:18:22.248 --> 00:18:23.137
That's overwhelming.
00:18:23.958 --> 00:18:24.958
Right, right.
00:18:25.448 --> 00:18:44.867
So, here we're talking about designing assignments, so I feel like let's take a couple steps back, think a bit larger here, and you start with designing things even before you put together your syllabus, and so what are some of the ways that the design of our course overall can appear in the syllabus?
00:18:45.795 --> 00:18:46.174
Yeah.
00:18:46.224 --> 00:18:50.424
So here we're also considering accessibility beyond the legal requirements.
00:18:50.444 --> 00:18:53.805
Of course, there are bare minimums that we have to do.
00:18:54.275 --> 00:18:58.164
We're certainly not saying like,"Okay, let's stop there." But how do we level that up?
00:18:58.355 --> 00:19:09.835
Because that's also a great way to have fewer assignment modifications based on particular accessibility needs or student disability accommodation needs.
00:19:11.102 --> 00:19:27.172
Well, speaking of modifications, adjustments, alternatives, I can hear some people wondering about how to address what may be some potential barriers to syllabus modifications that instructors might be up against.
00:19:28.126 --> 00:19:29.277
Yeah, absolutely.
00:19:29.326 --> 00:19:31.160
We have quite a number of those.
00:19:31.200 --> 00:19:37.869
Like, let's be honest, there's a lot of things and a lot of people, and a lot of different requirements out there.
00:19:38.240 --> 00:19:44.970
So depending on what type of program we're in, what type of college we're in, any of those things.
00:19:45.380 --> 00:19:50.109
And so some of the barriers we might have might be things like having secondary accreditation.
00:19:50.109 --> 00:20:05.242
So if you're in a program like engineering that has ABET or public health, those different types of programs, as well as many others, have a secondary accreditation that may have very particular expectations for learning outcomes, for what students are doing and when.
00:20:05.873 --> 00:20:11.116
We might also have the potential barriers of, you know, so and so colleague down the hall.
00:20:12.307 --> 00:20:12.537
Right?
00:20:12.967 --> 00:20:13.557
Right.
00:20:13.987 --> 00:20:23.067
We're teaching multiple sections, or we have multiple instructors, and there needs to be some sort of consistency, getting people on board.
00:20:23.606 --> 00:20:37.376
But we can have those conversations if we're looking at, perhaps, beginning some discussions with colleagues about ideas or plans or what can we change in this section that we keep consistent with the others.
00:20:37.863 --> 00:20:47.779
But we also might look at how we try out new things, again, those are department level, those are course level navigation types of activities.
00:20:48.339 --> 00:21:05.839
We might also have the major barrier of curriculum committees, or maybe it's so and so associate dean in your area, that is the person who has their hand very heavily on top of a syllabus, if you will.
00:21:06.325 --> 00:21:16.865
And so we might look at considering the committee's priorities, the timelines for review, and especially how we might apply innovations that don't need a committee review first.
00:21:17.134 --> 00:21:25.664
So we're not out here throwing out new learning outcomes for the course, but we're looking at maybe are there ways to tweak an assignment or something like that.
00:21:25.684 --> 00:21:39.174
Maybe there are ways to, again, talk with the people we need to and see what can I change, what shouldn't I change right now, and really prioritize the greatest needs first and then see what's needed to submit for approval.
00:21:40.237 --> 00:21:45.717
Well, I think we have certainly covered a lot about syllabi today.
00:21:45.926 --> 00:21:56.070
As we do for every episode, I wanted to ask if you could talk a little bit about how this conversation represents a keystone concept in teaching.
00:21:57.570 --> 00:22:02.211
I think it really relates to how we are looking at continuous improvement.
00:22:02.483 --> 00:22:12.607
We can look at our syllabus as this thing that we just get out and we update the dates, which, you know, it can be perfectly legitimate for that new semester.
00:22:13.032 --> 00:22:19.903
But we can also look at is there something small we can do in that small changes model that we talk about in the Stearns Center for Teaching and Learning?
00:22:20.343 --> 00:22:23.903
Is there something new we can try in maybe one or two little places?
00:22:24.163 --> 00:22:25.093
Can we try that out?
00:22:25.103 --> 00:22:26.472
Can we see how it goes?
00:22:26.952 --> 00:22:37.553
Because honestly, not every inclusive teaching or every evidence based teaching practice or idea or structure or plan will work for every course.
00:22:37.823 --> 00:22:45.880
But there are many influences on course design, and those will impact what's possible, or probable, or any of those things.
00:22:46.444 --> 00:22:47.134
Yes.
00:22:47.214 --> 00:22:47.934
Love that.
00:22:48.624 --> 00:22:50.594
All right, well, thank you, Dr.
00:22:50.594 --> 00:22:52.544
Yoho, for your insights today.
00:22:52.826 --> 00:22:53.477
Absolutely.
00:22:53.586 --> 00:22:55.586
It was great to be on this side of the microphone.
00:22:55.747 --> 00:22:57.307
I love it.
00:22:57.326 --> 00:22:58.396
I love it.
00:22:58.987 --> 00:23:02.616
And we want to thank you listeners for joining Dr.
00:23:02.616 --> 00:23:06.106
Yoho and I in our first Hear From Your Host episode.
00:23:06.707 --> 00:23:15.237
We would also like to take this opportunity to thank everyone listening during our first season of Keystone Concepts in Teaching.
00:23:15.817 --> 00:23:27.112
We hope you'll join us next season to hear from more new guests as we explore teaching and learning small change strategies that can be applied across disciplines and instructional modalities.
00:23:27.501 --> 00:23:31.592
In the meantime, you can visit our website at Stearnscenter.
00:23:31.612 --> 00:23:31.912
gmu.
00:23:33.271 --> 00:23:37.711
edu for more resources and opportunities to engage with us.
00:23:38.192 --> 00:23:39.102
See you next season!
00:00:08.273 --> 00:00:17.564
Hello and welcome to the Keystone Concepts in Teaching podcast where we share impactful and evidence based teaching practices to support all students and faculty.
00:00:17.925 --> 00:00:39.034
My name is Kelly Chandler and I am the Programs Administrator for the Stearns Center for Teaching and Learning at George Mason University and Producer for the Keystone Concepts in Teaching podcast Prior to my position at the Stearns Center, I taught first year writing courses and developmental writing as an adjunct professor at community colleges for four and a half years.
00:00:39.725 --> 00:00:45.755
For this episode, I am also your guest host in the first episode of our Hear From Your Host series.
00:00:46.405 --> 00:00:51.329
For these special episodes, we'll turn the tables and listeners will get to Hear From Your Host, Dr.
00:00:51.329 --> 00:00:54.895
Rachel Yoho, about keystone concepts and teaching.
00:00:55.475 --> 00:00:55.784
Dr.
00:00:55.784 --> 00:00:59.634
Yoho is the Assistant Director in the Stearns Center for Teaching and Learning.
00:00:59.984 --> 00:01:05.055
She is also a faculty affiliate in the Department of Environmental Science and Policy.
00:01:05.954 --> 00:01:06.305
Dr.
00:01:06.305 --> 00:01:15.981
Yoho and I will discuss the course syllabus and how we can make our syllabus work better to support everyone in the space, including the students and you as the instructor.
00:01:18.090 --> 00:01:22.061
So, let's start with discussing the purpose of the syllabus.
00:01:22.381 --> 00:01:28.599
Rachel, can you tell us about the potential multiple roles or purposes of the syllabus?
00:01:29.296 --> 00:01:33.147
So when we're talking about our syllabus, we have a number of things.
00:01:33.147 --> 00:01:36.906
The syllabus is sort of a legal document, but not really.
00:01:37.406 --> 00:01:39.387
And it's sort of an organizational tool.
00:01:39.662 --> 00:01:44.341
Well, it's mostly an organizational tool, and it's also sort of a means of communication.
00:01:44.691 --> 00:01:49.762
And so when we think about the purposes of our syllabus, we have lots of things going on.
00:01:50.132 --> 00:02:02.319
We're not talking about the syllabus as a contract or a legal contract because it's not really but it is sort of that planning for the semester and planning for what's going to happen in the course.
00:02:02.480 --> 00:02:03.061
Right.
00:02:03.061 --> 00:02:11.539
Some of the things that we don't think about as often with the syllabus is that the syllabus is also a public course description.
00:02:11.849 --> 00:02:20.509
It's that public face of what's going to happen in our course and something that we especially need to be thinking about or might be wanting to think about at a state institution.
00:02:20.794 --> 00:02:26.384
We also have uses and, you know, I was a graduate program director at my previous institution.
00:02:26.724 --> 00:02:33.215
Some of the uses that we might also think about a little bit less often are things like transfer and equivalency.
00:02:33.235 --> 00:02:40.741
So determining especially for transfer students, what could be used, what they took at a previous institution, what meets different requirements.
00:02:41.151 --> 00:02:51.002
So really, we see a lot of things going on, and I think that's really where we're looking at how do we balance all of this and also make it not 75 pages long.
00:02:51.847 --> 00:02:52.956
Yes, absolutely.
00:02:52.956 --> 00:02:55.556
I would say I was a little guilty of that.
00:02:55.586 --> 00:02:57.086
Maybe not 75 pages.
00:02:57.597 --> 00:03:08.953
Because you just get to a point where a student will try something new that you weren't expecting before and next thing you know you're like,"Ope, now I gotta put that in my syllabus." Just keeps getting longer and longer and longer.
00:03:09.698 --> 00:03:14.288
Oh, you can definitely see those you look at someone else's syllabus like,"Oh, that happened, huh?"
00:03:14.603 --> 00:03:15.532
Exactly.
00:03:16.532 --> 00:03:25.353
But I'm really interested in what we're saying here about how the syllabus can support both learners and the instructors.
00:03:25.763 --> 00:03:28.112
So what are some ways that this can be accomplished?
00:03:28.473 --> 00:03:34.980
Yeah, so when we're talking about our syllabus, it's a great way to have that first impression space for the students.
00:03:34.980 --> 00:03:36.610
You know, what will this course be like?
00:03:36.890 --> 00:03:38.591
What's this instructor like?
00:03:38.871 --> 00:03:41.070
And what can the students expect during the semester?
00:03:41.100 --> 00:03:47.471
Not just what they're going to do and when they're going to do it, but also, what's it going to be like working with Dr.
00:03:47.471 --> 00:03:50.001
Yoho over this, you know, number of weeks?
00:03:50.580 --> 00:04:14.049
And so, through the syllabus, we can use this as a document, as a tangible way to show our approach to teaching, what we value, how we're looking to support our students through their learning experiences, and highlight other student focused efforts, because as we're doing this, you know, we want it obviously to be a space for all of us, so planning is important.
00:04:14.248 --> 00:04:18.488
And so overall, the syllabus really is that essential learning tool.
00:04:18.519 --> 00:04:20.309
We're outlining expectations.
00:04:20.309 --> 00:04:21.738
We're directing student effort.
00:04:22.028 --> 00:04:27.809
We're also directing our effort and our timelines and our feedback and grading, all of that.
00:04:28.088 --> 00:04:33.988
And so overall, we're really looking at how we articulate the course goals and the learning progression.
00:04:33.999 --> 00:04:43.903
You know, here we've really shifted away from sort of that university business side of the syllabus and really get into the educational purposes with our syllabus.
00:04:44.519 --> 00:04:50.995
Absolutely, I hear you on that balancing act of taking care of our students, of course, with our syllabus, but also ourselves.
00:04:51.636 --> 00:05:04.249
So it seems like you were already kind of approaching this, but I want to ask a pointed question of what are some of the kind of core areas of a syllabus where we can focus on inclusive approaches?
00:05:04.834 --> 00:05:16.624
There are a lot of different areas that we can certainly think about and look at, but a few of those that I want to talk about right now are thinking about our course policies, as well as our readings and resources.
00:05:17.053 --> 00:05:20.874
And the course policies, for instance, might be things that we automatically go to.
00:05:20.894 --> 00:05:28.987
That's probably one of the sections that our students, if they look at the syllabus, are jumping right to what's the late policy, for instance.
00:05:29.362 --> 00:05:29.932
Oh, yeah.
00:05:31.346 --> 00:05:34.846
But some of our policies, we might be thinking about the workload.
00:05:35.117 --> 00:05:37.326
That's both for our students and ourselves.
00:05:37.326 --> 00:05:39.826
Again, that grading, the feedback, the timelines.
00:05:40.326 --> 00:05:55.466
But we also, of course, might be thinking about the late policy, and there's a number of ways we might be looking at, and we've mentioned in some of our earlier episodes, different approaches to late policies, the Life Happens Pass was mentioned in one of our first episodes by Dr.
00:05:55.466 --> 00:05:56.226
Shelley Reid.
00:05:56.766 --> 00:06:06.223
But we might also be thinking about some of our policies around, for instance, holidays, like different dates, how we schedule our course, as well as things like religious observances.
00:06:06.244 --> 00:06:14.041
So, for instance, George Mason University puts out a calendar, so we can keep in mind different major holidays for different religions.
00:06:14.632 --> 00:06:17.692
But we also might be thinking about the modality of our course.
00:06:17.692 --> 00:06:19.581
We might be thinking about individual needs.
00:06:19.932 --> 00:06:26.526
If we're teaching an online synchronous course, so something on Zoom, we might be thinking about camera policies.
00:06:26.526 --> 00:06:33.526
You know, not every bit of engagement perhaps needs to be people staring into a camera, but maybe there are other ways to contribute.
00:06:33.915 --> 00:06:53.262
Or we might think about caregiving needs or chronic illness or things like that of how we look at building in flexibility or building in understanding, just awareness that we're all people in these spaces and things happen not only for us but also for our students and how we can approach our course policies from that sort of understanding.
00:06:53.851 --> 00:06:57.999
But really here it's looking at how we might demonstrate our values and our approaches.
00:06:58.009 --> 00:07:04.059
So that might be openness or flexibility or communication, any of those types of things.
00:07:05.119 --> 00:07:11.624
I want to ask, along these same lines, I've seen some talk about tone in syllabus.
00:07:11.634 --> 00:07:16.084
Is this kind of related to that flexibility and policy writing?
00:07:16.444 --> 00:07:18.923
How might we work that into our syllabus?
00:07:19.004 --> 00:07:20.553
What do they mean when they say tone?
00:07:21.189 --> 00:07:21.978
Absolutely.
00:07:21.978 --> 00:07:32.718
I think tone is probably one of the most important things that we can think about in our syllabus and we can work on without actually changing content.
00:07:33.149 --> 00:07:41.055
So, essentially, when we're talking about tone or language, we're considering what's being said as well as how it's being said.
00:07:41.055 --> 00:07:48.389
And so again, this is a great way to demonstrate our commitment to shared values, to our students' learning and create a really nice atmosphere.
00:07:48.778 --> 00:07:54.658
And so some examples of this are considering the balance between warm and cold language use.
00:07:55.079 --> 00:08:11.269
So there's some great examples here that we' ll be sharing the resources and the sources in the show notes, but some examples of cold language, for instance, would be things like,"If you need to contact me outside of class..." That definitely may have the underlying,"Don't contact me."
00:08:11.995 --> 00:08:12.444
Yeah
00:08:12.444 --> 00:08:14.115
Maybe that's not what we mean.
00:08:14.134 --> 00:08:15.074
Please don't mean that.
00:08:16.309 --> 00:08:27.478
We might warm that up a little bit with,"I welcome you to contact me outside of class," or something like,"When you need assistance, I encourage you to contact me in these ways." Anything like that.
00:08:27.879 --> 00:08:45.698
Or we have another example like,"Late work will be penalized by 50%." That's a lot, but we can warm that up and say the exact same thing by saying that"Late work is still eligible for 50 percent partial credit." So it's exactly the same content.
00:08:45.719 --> 00:08:47.599
Like, we didn't change the policy in any way.
00:08:47.599 --> 00:08:49.629
It's just how it's being said.
00:08:49.759 --> 00:08:50.210
Mm.
00:08:50.529 --> 00:08:51.289
That makes sense.
00:08:51.764 --> 00:08:55.455
And the tone thing also works for all caps[capitals] writing.
00:08:55.475 --> 00:08:58.894
You know, there are different ways to bring attention to words.
00:08:58.904 --> 00:09:03.634
So that's, you know, bold or underlining or italics or, you know, any of these things.
00:09:03.682 --> 00:09:14.381
All caps writing, especially for people who are very online, in different spaces and social media and things, all caps writing is generally understood as like shouting or yelling.
00:09:14.971 --> 00:09:21.162
And so, avoiding all caps writing, like, we don't need to yell our policies at our students, even metaphorically.
00:09:21.662 --> 00:09:27.792
But, you know, maybe we look at underlining, or putting something in bold that we want to particularly highlight.
00:09:28.312 --> 00:09:29.072
Right.
00:09:29.072 --> 00:09:34.392
And I think at one point you were talking about inclusive approaches for readings.
00:09:34.432 --> 00:09:35.302
You had mentioned that.
00:09:35.471 --> 00:09:37.621
Did you want to speak more to what you were saying there?
00:09:38.221 --> 00:09:39.312
Yeah, absolutely.
00:09:39.562 --> 00:09:55.586
You know, when we're thinking about our readings and our resources, those can often feel like a pretty stagnant thing unless we're like,"Okay, I'm redoing the whole course." And essentially, we might be asking ourselves, whose voices are being heard and whose voices are not being heard?
00:09:56.067 --> 00:10:02.647
Does the course content represent a diversity of voices in any number of aspects of diversity, of course?
00:10:02.796 --> 00:10:06.025
So we might be looking at incorporating some other ways.
00:10:06.025 --> 00:10:12.995
Certainly not just continually adding to our readings, like that's not good for anyone, including, uh, us.
00:10:13.475 --> 00:10:28.495
But we might have different ways to highlight current practitioners in the field, or we might bring in a video, we might bring in something else during class, or might have these conversations with our students of whose voices are typically heard and whose voices are less heard.
00:10:28.995 --> 00:10:45.755
But also as we think about the readings and the resources, we might also be looking at the cost of textbooks, for instance, or the cost of software access, or whatever the thing is in your course to purchase.
00:10:46.145 --> 00:11:01.225
And so open access materials, or really just thinking about the accessibility of different resources or content can be really useful and a great way to make this space more accessible to everyone.
00:11:02.102 --> 00:11:02.812
Absolutely.
00:11:02.863 --> 00:11:03.413
I love that.
00:11:03.423 --> 00:11:11.153
I will never forget my first year at university, I had to purchase your typical Biology 101 book.
00:11:11.243 --> 00:11:24.822
It was huge, heavy, and then at the end of the semester, when I went back to the bookstore to resell it, because that's something you used to do back then, they were willing to offer me one cent, literally.
00:11:24.883 --> 00:11:25.783
One penny.
00:11:25.852 --> 00:11:33.418
When we had paid, I think, over 200 dollars for the book, because the next semester was going to be a new edition of that book.
00:11:33.479 --> 00:11:36.328
So mine was rendered useless.
00:11:36.479 --> 00:11:38.129
That was whew.
00:11:38.369 --> 00:11:39.119
Interesting.
00:11:39.547 --> 00:11:51.308
So I wanted to kind of switch gears a little bit here and then talk about one of the things students are also most worried about, so what about the activities and assignments?
00:11:51.318 --> 00:11:59.298
How might we include these in our syllabus in a way that supports both, you know, students and instructors?
00:12:00.136 --> 00:12:06.321
Yeah, that's another area our students are often probably likely to look at within the syllabus.
00:12:06.730 --> 00:12:09.360
And so we might be thinking about things like discussions.
00:12:09.390 --> 00:12:24.725
We might be especially considering the added importance and the extra focus on civil discourse and what's being said and what's going on and free speech and things we're not going to solve today.
00:12:25.245 --> 00:12:37.534
But we might be thinking about how we work with our students, and especially to cocreate some discussion ground rules, or classroom guidelines, or community expectations, or they're all the same thing, no matter what you want to call them there.
00:12:38.264 --> 00:12:41.134
But we can review those, certainly, with our students.
00:12:41.134 --> 00:12:52.625
We can use that kind of structure to intervene when we need to jump in during a, for instance, a live class discussion, or even if we're teaching fully asynchronous online.
00:12:52.769 --> 00:12:55.909
Even jump in on a discussion board post, for instance.
00:12:55.960 --> 00:13:07.129
And so this might be an area where we are designing assignments that the students could have a little bit more choice, a little bit more autonomy in terms of a specific topic or focus area.
00:13:07.620 --> 00:13:18.325
We might also in certain cases, certainly not across the board, but we might have the ability, on specific activities to have different types of content submissions.
00:13:18.725 --> 00:13:24.075
So having a little bit more agency for the students in terms of how they demonstrate their learning.
00:13:24.325 --> 00:13:43.215
So again, not across everything, but maybe in one or two activities in the course, they have the option to do, you know, X or Y activity, or they can, for instance, they might write, a paper of X amount of length, or they might create a video of Y duration, something like that.
00:13:43.365 --> 00:13:57.855
But also with our activities or even our examples, in some of our lectures or our content, we might think about and we might look at some of the names or the terms that are used in those, so like whose names are being used, whose names are not being used.
00:13:57.875 --> 00:14:02.095
Not our students names, but example people in, in activities, for instance.
00:14:02.095 --> 00:14:05.004
We might also think about how we look at our terms.
00:14:05.004 --> 00:14:07.544
Are we using the same word consistently?
00:14:08.044 --> 00:14:10.634
Especially for multilingual learners.
00:14:10.725 --> 00:14:17.735
changing up how we say the same thing, just to make it more vocally interesting is not a great instructional approach.
00:14:17.735 --> 00:14:26.134
So consistency in our terms, not only in our syllabus, but then in our discussion, our lecture recordings, live lectures, whatever that looks like.
00:14:26.715 --> 00:14:31.274
But also we could just talk to a colleague or get some student feedback on some of these things as well.
00:14:31.984 --> 00:14:35.774
The other one I will mention here is thinking about group work.
00:14:35.803 --> 00:14:46.307
Group work is such a challenge for everyone, but we can do a few things to help our students because working with others is incredibly important.
00:14:46.506 --> 00:14:55.509
I can't think of many professions where you don't have to work with other people, and it's just a good life skill anyway, And so the ways we can scaffold the group work.
00:14:55.509 --> 00:15:06.850
So thinking about how we help the students interact with each other, how we help them interact productively, and also having some check ins, some opportunities for feedback.
00:15:06.860 --> 00:15:17.529
You know, we don't want to get into those situations, which many instructors may have been in, in the past where you get to the end of the semester and you find out that group was wildly dysfunctional.
00:15:17.850 --> 00:15:19.139
And I didn't know it.
00:15:19.440 --> 00:15:19.809
Haha, yeah.
00:15:20.279 --> 00:15:24.970
And that's not where we want to be because that's not a good experience for anyone in the space.
00:15:25.210 --> 00:15:26.730
It's not a good learning experience.
00:15:26.740 --> 00:15:34.169
So the more we can check in that we facilitate the discussion with some guided questions and some structure can really help.
00:15:34.664 --> 00:15:35.384
Absolutely.
00:15:35.825 --> 00:15:51.813
If we're talking about syllabi supporting learners and instructors: whenever you are differentiating your assignments and giving those different options for how they can accomplish that assignment, I can hear some instructors thinking,"Well, that's extra work for me.
00:15:51.994 --> 00:16:00.267
Now I have to design three different assignments versus just one." What might be your response to someone who might be thinking that?
00:16:00.965 --> 00:16:04.345
Yeah, it's a great point, but I don't think we have to design three.
00:16:04.504 --> 00:16:15.764
So, for instance, we might give the students a prompt, you know, we might be saying, create a solution to this problem and provide evidence, whatever that looks like in your field.
00:16:16.215 --> 00:16:22.195
But you can demonstrate that, you can show, you can submit this using a number of different modalities.
00:16:22.195 --> 00:16:26.934
So, that could be the paper, that could be the infographic, that could be the video.
00:16:27.514 --> 00:16:29.774
But what's really key there are the bounds.
00:16:30.340 --> 00:16:35.389
It needs to be of this length, of this duration, of this level of detail, you know, anything like that.
00:16:35.440 --> 00:16:37.724
I've, you know, learned from my mistakes, folks.
00:16:37.883 --> 00:16:42.342
So that's really the key there, is having the options.
00:16:42.352 --> 00:16:46.732
So it doesn't have to be three different assignments, but just options for how they can submit it.
00:16:47.043 --> 00:16:56.013
And honestly, this is a great inclusive thing for us as the instructor because oh my goodness, it can make it so much more interesting to grade.
00:16:56.352 --> 00:17:00.003
Because we're not grading 50 of the exact same paper.
00:17:00.682 --> 00:17:02.734
Okay, hopefully they're not exactly the same.
00:17:03.037 --> 00:17:06.767
But, we're not grading 50 of the essentially same thing.
00:17:06.767 --> 00:17:11.353
That is boring, but if we're having the students, they can take more ownership.
00:17:11.553 --> 00:17:13.333
They can be a whole lot more interesting.
00:17:13.343 --> 00:17:16.232
They can be really engaging, which obviously isn't our goal.
00:17:16.232 --> 00:17:23.653
It's a good learning experience, but it's not a bad thing either to have the grading, have the experience be better for everyone.
00:17:24.478 --> 00:17:24.798
Right..
00:17:24.807 --> 00:17:32.038
And I think you would agree that what I don't hear you saying is that every single assignment has to have multiple options.
00:17:32.077 --> 00:17:39.271
This is something that you might do once, maybe twice, for one or maybe two assignments in a semester.
00:17:39.957 --> 00:17:44.457
Yeah, so the way I've done this before is a number of different activities through the semester.
00:17:44.457 --> 00:17:48.487
Let's say I had, maybe six, let's call it six different activities.
00:17:48.967 --> 00:17:59.047
In each of them I might have something different, so it might be they're writing, whatever the activity is, and they can choose a little bit on the topic, so I'll give them a few topics to choose among.
00:17:59.517 --> 00:18:07.136
Or in one or two activities, they might be able to do a video or a paper, something like that.
00:18:07.136 --> 00:18:13.563
So we're just doing little things here and there, and it creates a little variation, which is nice for everyone.
00:18:13.982 --> 00:18:19.282
But it's not a big thing, and this is a place to start with maybe one activity, like you said, Kelly.
00:18:19.292 --> 00:18:21.673
It's not, let's do all of them.
00:18:22.248 --> 00:18:23.137
That's overwhelming.
00:18:23.958 --> 00:18:24.958
Right, right.
00:18:25.448 --> 00:18:44.867
So, here we're talking about designing assignments, so I feel like let's take a couple steps back, think a bit larger here, and you start with designing things even before you put together your syllabus, and so what are some of the ways that the design of our course overall can appear in the syllabus?
00:18:45.795 --> 00:18:46.174
Yeah.
00:18:46.224 --> 00:18:50.424
So here we're also considering accessibility beyond the legal requirements.
00:18:50.444 --> 00:18:53.805
Of course, there are bare minimums that we have to do.
00:18:54.275 --> 00:18:58.164
We're certainly not saying like,"Okay, let's stop there." But how do we level that up?
00:18:58.355 --> 00:19:09.835
Because that's also a great way to have fewer assignment modifications based on particular accessibility needs or student disability accommodation needs.
00:19:11.102 --> 00:19:27.172
Well, speaking of modifications, adjustments, alternatives, I can hear some people wondering about how to address what may be some potential barriers to syllabus modifications that instructors might be up against.
00:19:28.126 --> 00:19:29.277
Yeah, absolutely.
00:19:29.326 --> 00:19:31.160
We have quite a number of those.
00:19:31.200 --> 00:19:37.869
Like, let's be honest, there's a lot of things and a lot of people, and a lot of different requirements out there.
00:19:38.240 --> 00:19:44.970
So depending on what type of program we're in, what type of college we're in, any of those things.
00:19:45.380 --> 00:19:50.109
And so some of the barriers we might have might be things like having secondary accreditation.
00:19:50.109 --> 00:20:05.242
So if you're in a program like engineering that has ABET or public health, those different types of programs, as well as many others, have a secondary accreditation that may have very particular expectations for learning outcomes, for what students are doing and when.
00:20:05.873 --> 00:20:11.116
We might also have the potential barriers of, you know, so and so colleague down the hall.
00:20:12.307 --> 00:20:12.537
Right?
00:20:12.967 --> 00:20:13.557
Right.
00:20:13.987 --> 00:20:23.067
We're teaching multiple sections, or we have multiple instructors, and there needs to be some sort of consistency, getting people on board.
00:20:23.606 --> 00:20:37.376
But we can have those conversations if we're looking at, perhaps, beginning some discussions with colleagues about ideas or plans or what can we change in this section that we keep consistent with the others.
00:20:37.863 --> 00:20:47.779
But we also might look at how we try out new things, again, those are department level, those are course level navigation types of activities.
00:20:48.339 --> 00:21:05.839
We might also have the major barrier of curriculum committees, or maybe it's so and so associate dean in your area, that is the person who has their hand very heavily on top of a syllabus, if you will.
00:21:06.325 --> 00:21:16.865
And so we might look at considering the committee's priorities, the timelines for review, and especially how we might apply innovations that don't need a committee review first.
00:21:17.134 --> 00:21:25.664
So we're not out here throwing out new learning outcomes for the course, but we're looking at maybe are there ways to tweak an assignment or something like that.
00:21:25.684 --> 00:21:39.174
Maybe there are ways to, again, talk with the people we need to and see what can I change, what shouldn't I change right now, and really prioritize the greatest needs first and then see what's needed to submit for approval.
00:21:40.237 --> 00:21:45.717
Well, I think we have certainly covered a lot about syllabi today.
00:21:45.926 --> 00:21:56.070
As we do for every episode, I wanted to ask if you could talk a little bit about how this conversation represents a keystone concept in teaching.
00:21:57.570 --> 00:22:02.211
I think it really relates to how we are looking at continuous improvement.
00:22:02.483 --> 00:22:12.607
We can look at our syllabus as this thing that we just get out and we update the dates, which, you know, it can be perfectly legitimate for that new semester.
00:22:13.032 --> 00:22:19.903
But we can also look at is there something small we can do in that small changes model that we talk about in the Stearns Center for Teaching and Learning?
00:22:20.343 --> 00:22:23.903
Is there something new we can try in maybe one or two little places?
00:22:24.163 --> 00:22:25.093
Can we try that out?
00:22:25.103 --> 00:22:26.472
Can we see how it goes?
00:22:26.952 --> 00:22:37.553
Because honestly, not every inclusive teaching or every evidence based teaching practice or idea or structure or plan will work for every course.
00:22:37.823 --> 00:22:45.880
But there are many influences on course design, and those will impact what's possible, or probable, or any of those things.
00:22:46.444 --> 00:22:47.134
Yes.
00:22:47.214 --> 00:22:47.934
Love that.
00:22:48.624 --> 00:22:50.594
All right, well, thank you, Dr.
00:22:50.594 --> 00:22:52.544
Yoho, for your insights today.
00:22:52.826 --> 00:22:53.477
Absolutely.
00:22:53.586 --> 00:22:55.586
It was great to be on this side of the microphone.
00:22:55.747 --> 00:22:57.307
I love it.
00:22:57.326 --> 00:22:58.396
I love it.
00:22:58.987 --> 00:23:02.616
And we want to thank you listeners for joining Dr.
00:23:02.616 --> 00:23:06.106
Yoho and I in our first Hear From Your Host episode.
00:23:06.707 --> 00:23:15.237
We would also like to take this opportunity to thank everyone listening during our first season of Keystone Concepts in Teaching.
00:23:15.817 --> 00:23:27.112
We hope you'll join us next season to hear from more new guests as we explore teaching and learning small change strategies that can be applied across disciplines and instructional modalities.
00:23:27.501 --> 00:23:31.592
In the meantime, you can visit our website at Stearnscenter.
00:23:31.612 --> 00:23:31.912
gmu.
00:23:33.271 --> 00:23:37.711
edu for more resources and opportunities to engage with us.
00:23:38.192 --> 00:23:39.102
See you next season!
