Hormuz Under Fire

WEBVTT
00:00:24.879 --> 00:00:26.800
Hello, you're listening to Chain Reaction.
00:00:26.800 --> 00:00:27.679
I'm Tony Hines.
00:00:27.679 --> 00:00:28.879
It's great to have you along.
00:00:28.879 --> 00:00:30.160
Thanks for dropping by.
00:00:30.160 --> 00:00:32.079
Hope you're gonna enjoy the episode.
00:00:32.079 --> 00:00:34.320
Stay tuned, stick around, stay informed.
00:00:34.320 --> 00:00:46.320
Well, in the weekly briefing this week, we're gonna take a look at what's happening in the Gulf, particularly in the Straits of Hormuz, and what it means for the Middle East and what it means for maritime traffic coming through the strait.
00:00:46.320 --> 00:00:48.799
Is the peace deal on?
00:00:48.799 --> 00:00:49.759
Is it off?
00:00:49.759 --> 00:00:50.640
Is it off?
00:00:50.640 --> 00:00:51.600
Is it on?
00:00:51.600 --> 00:00:54.079
Well, we all wanna know, don't we?
00:00:54.079 --> 00:01:13.439
And in the second part of this weekly briefing, we're gonna compare systematically the legacy of the current president against someone he often references, which is Hoover.
00:01:13.439 --> 00:01:18.159
So stick around, stay tuned, stay informed, stay ahead with chain reaction.
00:01:18.159 --> 00:01:27.599
Well, seven ships have been attacked by Iran in the past week and twelve people, maritimers, have been killed in those attacks.
00:01:27.599 --> 00:01:31.040
So do we still have a memorandum of understanding?
00:01:31.040 --> 00:01:32.719
Or is that dead?
00:01:32.719 --> 00:01:35.680
Or is it a memorandum of non-understanding?
00:01:35.680 --> 00:01:38.159
That's what many say.
00:01:38.159 --> 00:01:43.840
Are we still in the sixty-day peace arrangement?
00:01:43.840 --> 00:01:45.200
Or has that ended?
00:01:45.200 --> 00:01:48.079
And is the full scale war back on?
00:01:48.079 --> 00:01:50.719
These are questions that need answers.
00:01:50.719 --> 00:02:01.280
The US has threatened to attack Iranian infrastructure and said it'll get worse unless Iran complies.
00:02:01.280 --> 00:02:03.680
Iran have made threats too.
00:02:03.680 --> 00:02:16.560
They've said they'll close other choke points, presumably meaning the Babalman Straits, which you might remember the Houthis closed last year.
00:02:16.560 --> 00:02:30.400
Well, no sooner did Donald Trump announce that he was going to blockade the Strait of Hormuz after the Iranian attacks on ships going through that strait in the past few days.
00:02:30.400 --> 00:02:37.360
He said he would charge twenty percent as a tariff, and that would pay for the protection.
00:02:37.360 --> 00:02:40.000
Acting a bit like a Don, wasn't he?
00:02:40.000 --> 00:02:43.439
Yeah, not a Don Donald, but a mafia don.
00:02:43.439 --> 00:02:45.039
Protection money.
00:02:45.039 --> 00:02:48.080
Very quickly changed his tune on this.
00:02:48.080 --> 00:02:55.199
Obviously the administrative process of actually collecting that toll is difficult, no doubt.
00:02:55.199 --> 00:02:57.599
And he's backtracked.
00:02:57.599 --> 00:03:00.960
So the tacos back.
00:03:00.960 --> 00:03:09.199
Of course this is absolutely of no help to mariners trying to sail through those Straits of Hormuz.
00:03:09.199 --> 00:03:24.719
It was back in February when we first had straightforward passage through the Straits of Hormuz, and shortly after that on the last day of February the twenty eighth, Israel and the United States attacked Iran.
00:03:24.719 --> 00:03:34.400
And that let loose a whole chaotic approach which hasn't resolved anything from what we can see.
00:03:34.400 --> 00:03:48.960
It's caused lots of damage, it's slowed world trade, and of course, the infrastructure damage in the Middle East is immense, as Iran, like a frightened dog, attacked all its neighbors.
00:03:48.960 --> 00:04:08.400
Of course, if the United States and Israel hadn't have attacked Iran on february twenty eighth, there'd be no holdups in the Straits of Hormuz, and they wouldn't have had to continue this war, which has lasted much longer, I think, than anybody ever expected.
00:04:08.400 --> 00:04:28.399
And Donald Trump's come out and said they've got no navy, he's got rid of all the navy, he's taken all the missile sites out, he's demolished the Air Force, they've got no planes, and yet here we are, Iran are still fighting, and they're still causing damage to other countries and to shipping in the Straits of Hormuz.
00:04:28.399 --> 00:04:30.639
So who do we believe?
00:04:30.639 --> 00:04:36.319
Iran, of course, is a hostile state, and they do bad things.
00:04:36.319 --> 00:04:40.079
But America's played the game just as badly.
00:04:40.079 --> 00:04:45.519
They've been egged on by Israel, and you do wonder who's in control here.
00:04:45.519 --> 00:04:49.920
Is Donald Trump in control or is the tail wagging the dog?
00:04:49.920 --> 00:04:51.839
Well, who knows?
00:04:51.839 --> 00:05:22.399
But certainly as far as global trade goes, this closure of the Strait of Horror Moose is very damaging, it's created uncertainty, and many shipping companies and many trading companies are now suggesting that they want more certainty, and if they want more certainty, that might mean fixing contracts ahead of time, and it might mean negotiating prices that are slightly higher, but at least they're fixed and they know with some certainty what their costs are going to be.
00:05:22.399 --> 00:05:26.800
And that's what they're hoping for when they buy future contracts.
00:05:26.800 --> 00:05:37.519
Certainly the insurance premiums will go back up again as a result of the recent attacks, and that will add to everybody's cost.
00:05:37.519 --> 00:05:50.560
The shortages will continue of those critical products that have to travel through the Straits of Hormuz, and of course it puts shipping costs up everywhere because of this Middle East conflict.
00:05:50.560 --> 00:05:53.279
So the sooner it could be settled, the better.
00:05:53.279 --> 00:05:57.439
But it doesn't look like getting sorted any time soon.
00:05:57.439 --> 00:06:01.040
So all the costs are going to be inflationary.
00:06:01.040 --> 00:06:27.519
They're going to add to inflation, it means that household costs are going to continue to rise, it means that food prices will continue to rise, it means there will be shortages, oil prices will rise, they're already going back up as a result of the recent activity, and the hope we had a week or two back that this was all coming to an end has now been well and truly flattened.
00:06:27.519 --> 00:06:35.759
Brent crude oil prices have gone up to about eighty-five dollars a barrel.
00:06:35.759 --> 00:06:42.639
And that's from a return to a low base which was under seventy dollars a barrel.
00:06:42.639 --> 00:06:45.279
So that's just in the past couple of days.
00:06:45.279 --> 00:06:48.560
So fuel prices are on the rise.
00:06:48.560 --> 00:06:51.839
That means transport costs are on the rise.
00:06:51.839 --> 00:06:59.040
It means lots of uncertainty for hauliers and for all the people they contract with.
00:06:59.040 --> 00:07:12.720
For the time being, lots of those prices will remain fixed, but of course those costs cannot be absorbed forever, so that means they're going to push through the supply chain and they're going to come down to consumers.
00:07:12.720 --> 00:07:18.879
And consumers are going to end up paying a lot more money for food and anything they buy.
00:07:18.879 --> 00:07:27.040
Businesses too will find it difficult as they try to plan ahead, because their costs are going to be rising also.
00:07:27.040 --> 00:07:31.439
And they too cannot absorb those costs continuously.
00:07:31.439 --> 00:07:34.000
So how long is this war going to go on?
00:07:34.000 --> 00:07:41.839
No good asking Donald Trump because he doesn't know, and even if he did know, his estimates would be wildly out.
00:07:41.839 --> 00:07:54.160
Unfortunately, it comes down to the fact that we can't trust anything that comes out of the White House in North America these days, because we get a lot of fake news, don't we, coming out of the White House?
00:07:54.160 --> 00:07:58.560
We get told one thing, it's backtracked, we get told something else.
00:07:58.560 --> 00:08:02.560
That's false too, and nobody knows where they are.
00:08:02.560 --> 00:08:11.040
The uncertainty is proliferated by the statements that come out from the people we need to trust.
00:08:11.040 --> 00:08:22.240
Now President Trump is on the record as saying a number of times he doesn't want to be compared to Herbert Hoover.
00:08:22.240 --> 00:08:24.079
And you can see why.
00:08:24.079 --> 00:08:40.000
Hoover was President of the United States during the 1929 crash, the early Great Depression, a belief in limited federal intervention, and a perception of being slow to respond to cascading crises.
00:08:40.000 --> 00:08:50.639
Trump, of course, is acutely aware of this historical shadow, and he said he doesn't want a depression on his resume.
00:08:50.639 --> 00:08:52.559
But is that what he's gonna get?
00:08:52.559 --> 00:08:53.679
It's likely.
00:08:53.679 --> 00:08:54.720
And why?
00:08:54.720 --> 00:08:56.879
Well, it's all over Iran.
00:08:56.879 --> 00:09:00.240
The conflict in Iran, Trump's folly.
00:09:00.240 --> 00:09:07.039
In a recent commentary, foreign correspondent Richard Engel talked to Professor Robert A.
00:09:07.039 --> 00:09:12.879
Pape, and they outlined a comparison that deserves serious attention.
00:09:12.879 --> 00:09:25.840
The structural parallels between Herbert Hoover's crisis, which defined his presidency, and the escalatory pressures shaping Donald Trump's current geopolitical decisions.
00:09:25.840 --> 00:09:35.440
The discussion appears in Richard Engel's podcast episode Inside Iran Is the War About to Escalate?
00:09:35.440 --> 00:09:37.919
And I'll put the link in the notes.
00:09:37.919 --> 00:09:41.919
Pape is not a casual commentator.
00:09:41.919 --> 00:10:02.000
He's a professor of political science at the University of Chicago and director of the Chicago Project on Security and Threats, a major research center whose empirical data sets and analysis are used by US government agencies, defense institutions, and global media.
00:10:02.000 --> 00:10:19.120
He previously taught at Harvard University, has advised the US Department of Defense and the US Air Force on coercive strategy and escalation modeling, and is the author of Bombing to Win, a foundational text in modern security studies.
00:10:19.120 --> 00:10:32.399
His work is widely cited, policy relevant, and grounded in decades of research on how crises intensify and how leaders make decisions under pressure.
00:10:32.399 --> 00:10:47.759
When someone with that level of expertise draws a Hoover Trump comparison, it's worth listening, and I'll try to summarize as best I can some of the arguments and what it means for global supply chains and policy.
00:10:47.759 --> 00:10:53.679
It isn't a personality comparison between President Trump and Herbert Hoover.
00:10:53.679 --> 00:11:02.720
It's a systems analysis and it highlights how leaders become defined by crises they can't fully control.
00:11:02.720 --> 00:11:07.519
Let's think about the crisis in the two cases.
00:11:07.519 --> 00:11:17.360
Hoover inherited one, and Trump has amplified one, and in fact caused it probably, made it worse.
00:11:17.360 --> 00:11:22.639
Herbert Hoover entered office on the eve of the nineteen twenty nine crash.
00:11:22.639 --> 00:11:27.600
The economic collapse overwhelmed his administration and shaped his legacy.
00:11:27.600 --> 00:11:43.519
Donald Trump faces a different kind of systemic threat, one that analysts argue has been intensified by his own foreign policy actions, particularly in relation to Iran, the Gulf, and global energy markets.
00:11:43.519 --> 00:11:58.159
Recent reporting confirms that Iran has expanded uranium enrichment beyond sixty percent, a threshold repeatedly flagged by the International Atomic Energy Agency as a proliferation risk.
00:11:58.159 --> 00:12:11.759
Iran also maintains strategic leverage over the Strait of Hall Moose, through which roughly twenty percent of global oil flows pass, and disruption here has immediate global consequences.
00:12:11.759 --> 00:12:16.080
They're not abstract risks, they're structural realities.
00:12:16.080 --> 00:12:24.080
Like many strategists, Professor Pape has an escalation framework, where he talks about the fork in the road.
00:12:24.080 --> 00:12:26.799
It's a stage model of what happens.
00:12:26.799 --> 00:12:47.919
Professor Pape's analysis is grounded in a stage-based escalation model, a framework widely used in strategy studies to map how crises intensify, and his assessment of Trump's current decision is stark, and the two stages that were currently at this fork in the road is between stage three and stage four.
00:12:47.919 --> 00:13:09.279
In stage four, which Donald Trump appeared to be moving towards, the scenario is that the United States accepts a strategic setback, Iran retains some enriched uranium, supposedly not for military purposes, and Iran maintains effective control over the Strait of Hormuz.
00:13:09.279 --> 00:13:12.960
Iran emerges as the dominant regional power.
00:13:12.960 --> 00:13:17.279
The outcome is politically damaging for Trump, but it avoids war.
00:13:17.279 --> 00:13:21.679
It is stabilizing, but carries the optics of concession.
00:13:21.679 --> 00:13:25.120
Stage three is to escalate militarily.
00:13:25.120 --> 00:13:26.960
This is the dangerous pivot.
00:13:26.960 --> 00:13:32.320
The United States forces enter the theater, well they're already on there.
00:13:32.320 --> 00:13:35.759
Iran responds asymmetrically across the region.
00:13:35.759 --> 00:13:37.759
That's sort of happening.
00:13:37.759 --> 00:13:49.600
Gulf shipping becomes vulnerable, oil markets destabilize, inflation spikes worldwide, supply chains fracture, and a global recession becomes likely.
00:13:49.600 --> 00:13:56.720
And once a leader enters stage three, the probability of uncontrolled escalation rises sharply.
00:13:56.720 --> 00:14:02.000
This is a structural parallel of Hoover, a crash that could define a presidency.
00:14:02.000 --> 00:14:10.080
The global economic stakes and why analysts fear a 1929-style crash, a shock to the system.
00:14:10.080 --> 00:14:15.519
A conflict in the Gulf is not a regional war, it's a global economic event.
00:14:15.519 --> 00:14:22.799
Energy analysts have repeatedly warned that even partial disruption of the Strait of Hormuz would send oil prices soaring.
00:14:22.799 --> 00:14:40.080
Post-pandemic supply chains remain fragile, meaning transport costs rise, manufacturing slows, inflationary pressure increases, central banks tighten, investment contracts, and emerging markets face currency crises.
00:14:40.080 --> 00:14:43.519
Historically, energy shocks have preceded recessions.
00:14:43.519 --> 00:14:49.120
A whore moose triggered shock would be larger and more complex.
00:14:49.120 --> 00:14:57.440
And this is why the discussion between Richard Engel and Professor Pape recognize that this matters.
00:14:57.440 --> 00:14:59.600
Hoover's crisis was financial.
00:14:59.600 --> 00:15:06.799
Trump's crisis is geopolitical, has implications for energy, and for financial markets.
00:15:06.799 --> 00:15:08.720
It's a cascading chain.
00:15:08.720 --> 00:15:14.159
And the direction of travel, the path we're on, escalation is becoming more likely.
00:15:14.159 --> 00:15:18.639
Several structural pressures are pushing the situation beyond stage three.
00:15:18.639 --> 00:15:37.840
Iran's growing regional influence, Gulf states recalibrating alliances between the US, China and Russia, US credibility concerns in deterrence, domestic political pressure to avoid appearing weak, and Trump's own statement signaling willingness to use force.
00:15:37.840 --> 00:15:41.360
He's made a number of statements saying he's going to use force.
00:15:41.360 --> 00:15:49.679
This combination makes escalation more likely than concession, even when leaders publicly deny the intention is to escalate.
00:15:49.679 --> 00:15:53.519
It could be a legacy defining moment for President Trump.
00:15:53.519 --> 00:15:57.279
Hoover's presidency was defined by a crisis he couldn't control.
00:15:57.279 --> 00:16:03.840
Trump's presidency may be defined by a crisis he helped to create and escalate.
00:16:03.840 --> 00:16:17.919
If the US-Iran confrontation moves into stage three, the world faces a potential Gulf War, an energy shock, a global recession, a legacy-defining moment for the current US President.
00:16:17.919 --> 00:16:25.440
This is not speculation, it's a structural reading of the geopolitical economic realities now in play.
00:16:25.440 --> 00:16:45.679
As we come to the end of this week's episode, it's worth noting that for the past seven days, the United States have every night bombed Iran.
00:16:45.679 --> 00:16:49.759
And so it doesn't look like peace, does it?
00:16:49.759 --> 00:16:55.200
And Iran are threatening to bomb their neighbors.
00:16:55.200 --> 00:17:05.359
And will they go beyond bombing military infrastructure or nations that support the United States in the Middle East?
00:17:06.160 --> 00:17:11.440
Well, the informed opinion suggests that they might.
00:17:11.440 --> 00:17:17.759
As we've already discussed.
00:17:17.759 --> 00:17:21.759
And is it time to step back from the brink?
00:17:23.680 --> 00:17:34.319
If of course the United States don't step back from the brink, then there probably isn't much alternative to actually putting boots on the ground.
00:17:34.319 --> 00:17:39.519
And then we're in for a much longer war over a much longer period.
00:17:39.519 --> 00:17:44.720
And it's difficult to say how that will play out.
00:17:44.720 --> 00:17:47.519
I'm sure it's not what the President wants.
00:17:47.519 --> 00:17:50.480
I'm sure it isn't what the US administration wants.
00:17:51.440 --> 00:17:55.519
And it's a foolish war in many respects.
00:17:55.519 --> 00:18:01.039
I suppose we could argue that all wars are foolish.
00:18:01.039 --> 00:18:02.960
It's failed diplomacy.
00:18:02.960 --> 00:18:08.480
Anyway, it will impact global trade.
00:18:09.200 --> 00:18:16.160
It will mean lower incomes for gross domestic product for most countries around the world.
00:18:16.160 --> 00:18:18.880
It will cause trade issues.
00:18:18.880 --> 00:18:32.079
It will push bond prices up, it will increase inflation, and it will increase the rates of interest that central bankers have to charge as we move forward.
00:18:32.079 --> 00:18:34.799
So everything's going to be more expensive.
00:18:34.799 --> 00:18:40.559
And will we ever get back to the pre Iran invasion economic situation?
00:18:40.559 --> 00:18:41.599
Doubtful.
00:18:41.599 --> 00:18:51.759
Over 8,000 people have been killed in the Iran War since it started, as Epic Fury on the twenty eighth of February.
00:18:51.759 --> 00:19:03.839
The United States this week had two further casualties, but in total, over 8,000 deaths across all countries of the Middle East and elsewhere as a result of this conflict.
00:19:03.839 --> 00:19:13.039
And remember, a lot of those people are innocent people, civilians, men, women and children.
00:19:13.039 --> 00:19:20.640
Some good episodes coming your way in the next few weeks.
00:19:20.640 --> 00:19:22.079
Look out for those.
00:19:22.079 --> 00:19:27.599
Particularly the one with Tomas Nodraski, the author of Mineral War.
00:19:27.599 --> 00:19:34.000
Don't forget to subscribe, and you'll be first to know when new episodes are in, and you'll never miss an episode.
00:19:34.000 --> 00:19:35.680
Well, that's it for today.
00:19:35.680 --> 00:19:40.400
I'm Tony Hines, I'm signing off, and I'll see you next time in Chain Reaction.
00:19:40.400 --> 00:19:41.119
Take care.
00:19:41.119 --> 00:19:42.480
Bye for now.
00:19:56.160 --> 00:19:58.880
Chain Reaction Business News with Tony Hines.
00:19:58.880 --> 00:20:04.880
All things impacting global trade, supply chain advantage, and policy this week.
00:20:07.279 --> 00:20:09.359
You've been listening to Chain Reaction.
00:20:09.359 --> 00:20:10.640
Thanks for listening.
00:20:10.640 --> 00:20:20.079
We have listeners in 140 plus countries around the globe on six continents and in over eight thousand cities.