Unlocking Behaviour Change
Unlocking Behaviour Change
✓

Why every behavioural scientist should understand 'Bayesian' probability

00:27:52
Podcasts
RSS
Link

이 에피소드에 관해

Robert makes the bold claim that 'probability' underlies all knowledge and that behavioural scientist should always be thinking about knowledge and claims we make in terms of 'priors' (their judgement of the likelihood that something is true before gathering some evidence) and their 'posterior probabilities' (their judgement of the likelihood that it is true after having gathered some evidence), and should never be 100% certain about anything!

Want more? Check out our latest books:  

Energise: The Secrets Of Motivation: https://shorturl.at/bbA7y 

React: Harness Your Animal Brain: https://shorturl.at/yiFQ9  

Sign up to Robert’s Substack: https://robertwest100.substack.com/  

Subscribe to the UBC YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@unlockingbehaviourchange  

사회 과학
과학
정신 건강
사회와 문화
건강 및 피트니스
영어
미국
API를 사용하여JSON에서 이 에피소드를 가져옵니다.

전사 🔗

Are you the producer of this podcast? Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text? Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds

과거 에피소드 검색

Unlocking Behaviour Change의 과거 에피소드를 검색하세요.
이 검색 창을 웹 사이트에 삽입

이 팟캐스트의 다른 에피소드

Decision fail number 4 of 5: 'I didn't imagine'

Decision fail number 4 of 5: 'I didn't imagine'

In the mini-series on decision fails - common things that we fail to do that result in mistakes when making decisions - this episode covers our failures of imagination. Robert thinks this plays a large part in the well-known phenomenon of 'temporal discounting' - failing adequately to concern ourse…
00:27:27
공유하기
저장하기
Decision fail number 5 of 5: 'I didn't ask'

Decision fail number 5 of 5: 'I didn't ask'

Last but not least in our miniseries on decision fails we have 'I didn't ask'. Even when we think we know it all, we should often ask for another opinion or perspective. And we should always reflect on our own limitations and be willing to consult experts for important decisions that require techni…
00:27:58
공유하기
저장하기
How does COM-B compare to the Theory of Planned Behaviour? Part 1 - Understanding the TPB

How does COM-B compare to the Theory of Planned Behaviour? Part 1 - Understanding the TPB

The COM-B model of behaviour was put forward in 2011 as a comprehensive model of behaviour, capturing influences that lay within individuals (capability and motivation) as well as the outside world (opportunity). It has become popular, with some 17,000 citations to the original paper, but nothing l…
00:28:12
공유하기
저장하기
Decision fail number 3 of 5: 'I didn't think'

Decision fail number 3 of 5: 'I didn't think'

Continuing on the ‘Top 5 Decision Fails’, Robert and Jamie discuss: ‘I didn’t think’. Why don’t leaders appear to think through the consequences of starting wars? When will the AI bubble burst? Thinking things through comes in three main flavours: depth of analysis, breadth of analysis, and choice…
00:27:00
공유하기
저장하기
How does COM-B compare to the Theory of Planned Behaviour? Part 2 - What COM-B adds

How does COM-B compare to the Theory of Planned Behaviour? Part 2 - What COM-B adds

In the second half of a two-parter, Robert explains the limitations of the Theory of Planned Behaviour and how the COM-B model addresses these. The Theory of Planned Behaviour is EXTREMELY widely used and increasingly so despite its age. Among the limitations of the TPB that COM-B addresses are: 1)…
00:28:03
공유하기
저장하기
면책 조항: 이 페이지에 포함된 팟캐스트와 작품은 Robert West에서 가져온 것입니다. 이 팟캐스트는 소유자의 재산이며 Listen Notes, Inc.와 제휴하거나 보증하지 않습니다.
PROMOTED
Listen411.com: Lightning-fast Podcast Transcription and Summarization. Transcribe 1-hour audio in under 1 minute. Pay-as-you-go.
Listen411.com: Lightning-fast Podcast Transcription and Summarization. Transcribe 1-hour audio in under 1 minute. Pay-as-you-go.
Audio to Text

추천
API를 사용하여 이 에피소드 가져오기