이 에피소드에 관해
We discuss how living meta‑analyses—meta‑analyses that are continuously updated as new studies appear—can cut research waste and keep evidence current. We also chat about how using synthetic research participants is a terrible idea.
Links
- The BMJ Christmas special paper on how recent is "recent"
- The synthetic panel service
- The paper describing a living meta-analysis platform for oxytocin research
- A preprint commentary on living meta-analysis
Social media links
영어
호주
노골적인 콘텐츠
전사 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
이 팟캐스트의 다른 에피소드
We discuss the recent retraction of a paper that reported the effects of rigour-enhancing practices on replicability. We also cover James' new estimate that 1 out of 7 scientific papers are fake.
Links
The story about data integrity concerns in 130 women’s health papers
James' new preprint …
Dan and James discuss a recent editorial which argues that double-blind peer review is detrimental to scientific integrity.
Links
The editorial from Christopher Mebane: https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgae046
Other links
Everything Hertz on Bluesky
Dan on Bluesky
James on Bluesky
Eve…
In this episode we chat about a Nordic approach for evaluating the journal quality and how we should be teaching undergraduates to evaluate journal and article quality
Links
The Norwegian journal register
The Finnish journal register
Episode 22, where we played "Pokemon or Cholesterol medic…
Open access articles have democratized the availability of scientific research, but are author-paid publication fees undermining the quality of science?
The preprint by Morgan and Smaldino - https://osf.io/preprints/osf/3ez9v
Paul Smaldino's text book - Modeling social behavior
Main edisode ta…
We chat about the events that started the replication crisis in psychology and Dorothy Bishop's recent resignation from the Royal Society
Links
The resignation blogpost from Dorothy Bishop
The bluesky post from Sarah Weiten that asked the question, "If you had to cite an event that opened th…
면책 조항: 이 페이지에 포함된 팟캐스트와 작품은 Dan Quintana에서 가져온 것입니다. 이 팟캐스트는 소유자의 재산이며 Listen Notes, Inc.와 제휴하거나 보증하지 않습니다.
