이 에피소드에 관해
Nobody is coming to make leadership easier, and that can be the most useful thing we admit out loud. We sit down for our Series Five finale to trace the thread that keeps surfacing from wildly different guests and settings: stop waiting for perfect conditions, lead from where you are, and build momentum with the people already in the room.
From there, we explore what it takes to stay effective when uncertainty is the default. We talk self care as a leadership practice rather than a luxury, including the need for real thinking time, “time with no purpose”, and the tougher idea of “living in the gaps” instead of filling every silence with a phone, a meeting, or a hot take.
We also dig into why curiosity matters when leaders do not have all the answers, and how experimentation can beat the fear of getting it wrong.
If you care about education leadership, university governance, organisational culture, and better decision making under pressure, this one will give you plenty to chew over. Follow the show, share it with a colleague, and leave a review, what theme should we pull on in the next series?
Let us know what you think of this episode - drop us a message and connect via LinkedIn.
노트보기 🔗
전사 🔗
00:00:07.750 --> 00:00:10.309
Welcome to the latest episode of EdInfluence.
00:00:10.309 --> 00:00:15.830
I'm Nick MacKenzie from Browne Jacobson, and today I'm delighted to be joined by my colleague Iain Blatherwick.
00:00:15.830 --> 00:00:16.549
Hi Iain.
00:00:17.109 --> 00:00:17.829
Hi Nick.
00:00:17.829 --> 00:00:19.109
Good to be here.
00:00:19.670 --> 00:00:34.950
So, as regular listeners will know, this is our end of series retrospective, a chance for us to step back and reflect on the conversations I've had over the course of series five and pull out some themes and moments that stayed with us.
00:00:34.950 --> 00:00:49.429
So it's a slightly different format from our usual episodes, but it's always one of my favourite to record because there's something interesting about looking at eight conversations laid end to end and asking what does this actually add up to?
00:00:49.429 --> 00:00:51.669
What's the series really about?
00:00:51.669 --> 00:01:06.629
So Ian and I have reviewed a selection of the episodes ahead of today, and what we've done before and we'll do again is the idea we'll come with a theme, something that generally struck us, and then we'll see what happens when we put all those themes together in the room.
00:01:06.629 --> 00:01:14.630
Before I hand over to you, Ian, I want to put a thread on the table, something that I think runs through the whole of series five.
00:01:14.630 --> 00:01:21.590
And the through line I want to suggest is no one is coming, lead from where you are.
00:01:21.590 --> 00:01:28.710
For me, series five kept returning from completely different directions to the same quiet reckoning.
00:01:28.710 --> 00:01:32.870
The conditions you're waiting for aren't coming, the cavalry isn't on the way.
00:01:32.870 --> 00:01:37.829
And the moment that you accept that this is the moment real leadership begins.
00:01:37.829 --> 00:01:47.190
And I think Lucy Easthope, she named it probably most directly, she had what I thought three quite activating words for emergency planners.
00:01:47.190 --> 00:01:48.950
Help isn't coming.
00:01:48.950 --> 00:01:54.710
And Steve West picked it up immediately and applied it to the entire university sector right now.
00:01:54.710 --> 00:02:00.070
But the same truth was running underneath almost every other conversation, even when the words were different.
00:02:00.070 --> 00:02:08.229
So I think um Andrew Warren talked about the courage to make decisions that will stand the test of time, knowing the conditions will never be perfect.
00:02:08.229 --> 00:02:15.349
Paul Estes talked about putting your own oxygen mask on rather than waiting for someone else to hand it to you.
00:02:15.349 --> 00:02:25.669
Andy Long talked about leading university through uncertainty by not having answers, by trusting people around you enough to find the answers together.
00:02:25.669 --> 00:02:33.750
Edward Fatalis talked about stop being British, so stop waiting for permission to believe your work is good enough.
00:02:33.750 --> 00:02:37.909
Charlotte Blunt, she put her own register on it.
00:02:37.909 --> 00:02:44.469
She talked about you've got to be courageous in leadership and trust people to be brilliant, not wait for them to be.
00:02:44.469 --> 00:02:46.549
So trust them in advance.
00:02:46.549 --> 00:02:52.870
And Janet Smith arrived at it from the most personal direction from anybody in the series.
00:02:52.870 --> 00:03:03.590
She lost her mother at 12 unexpectedly overnight, and what she drew from it wasn't trauma but a kind of bedrock that nothing can ever be as bad again.
00:03:03.590 --> 00:03:15.109
That doesn't feel like a leadership framework, it's something lived all the way through to certainty, and it produces exactly the same quality the through line describes.
00:03:15.109 --> 00:03:19.989
I think the ability to act without waiting for conditions that will never be perfect.
00:03:19.989 --> 00:03:23.989
No, I don't think that through line's pessimism, I think it's actually the opposite.
00:03:23.989 --> 00:03:26.629
But what do you think, Ian?
00:03:27.349 --> 00:03:38.310
Well, that I I was about to say that bit about pessimism because I I the scenarios painted there suggests that you're in stormy waters and you've got to plan your route out of it.
00:03:38.310 --> 00:03:48.229
But I think Edward did also say talking about the sector, don't wait to be told by you know the powers that be, what's going to happen about the curriculum or or whatever.
00:03:48.229 --> 00:03:49.750
Don't sit back and wait.
00:03:49.750 --> 00:03:59.509
So I think I think there is a lesson here as well that even when things are good, make sure you're using that time to push on and do better.
00:03:59.509 --> 00:04:14.870
And actually, being honest, I'm not always the best making the most of those things, that those times when they're on an even keel, and then before you know it, something else has gone awry, and you're sat there wishing, cracky, I wish I'd made more use of that time there to change these things or to push these things on.
00:04:14.870 --> 00:04:15.590
So I agree.
00:04:15.590 --> 00:04:19.189
I don't think it is just always about the toughest times you find yourself in.
00:04:19.189 --> 00:04:22.870
Wherever you find yourself, so I guess that is lead from where you are.
00:04:22.870 --> 00:04:33.029
Wherever you find yourself, make sure you're still trying to push forward and make the most of the circumstances, whether you've got a wind in your favour or wind against you.
00:04:33.029 --> 00:04:34.789
Keep pushing forward.
00:04:34.789 --> 00:04:41.589
So yeah, I it was interesting the different circumstances that led to those comments.
00:04:41.589 --> 00:04:53.029
But but yeah, leadership is taking advantage of the supporting winds or working your way through those headwinds and and making sure that you've you've got the right people around you and making the most of it.
00:04:53.750 --> 00:04:57.829
Do you think there's something in there that they were perhaps touching on about?
00:04:57.829 --> 00:05:08.149
There's a kind of clarity that you only get a vote once you you stop waiting, whether it's for help or whether it's for something else.
00:05:08.149 --> 00:05:12.870
But there's a clarity that perhaps comes when you're you're in the moment.
00:05:14.389 --> 00:05:18.870
You know, a long time ago, well, we actually we're both this is like confession, Nick, a long time ago.
00:05:18.870 --> 00:05:20.069
We were both corporate lawyers.
00:05:20.069 --> 00:05:22.550
Maybe we didn't want our listeners to know that.
00:05:22.550 --> 00:05:32.069
But I think there is a bit of me that the adrenaline of a the adrenaline of a deadline or a completion meeting or something definitely helps me work at a better level.
00:05:32.069 --> 00:05:35.430
And maybe that's one of these challenges in leading from where you are.
00:05:35.430 --> 00:05:47.110
Maybe when there is that element of crisis, the adrenaline kicks in and so on, that you do raise your game, which is maybe why I'm not so good at dealing when things are a little bit calmer, that you know, maybe it doesn't push you on.
00:05:47.110 --> 00:05:58.789
I think I feel similarly when I'm doing my coaching, that the coaching I do best is when I'm coaching someone who I don't know their world, I don't know their environment.
00:05:58.789 --> 00:06:01.110
It's making me work that bit harder.
00:06:01.110 --> 00:06:07.509
And again, you're you're uh you're introducing an element of you're out of your comfort zone, you're having to work harder, you have to think harder.
00:06:07.509 --> 00:06:18.629
So it's interesting the different the different things that drive you and push you, and maybe being aware of those to make sure that you do make the most of those opportunities and and lead from where you are.
00:06:20.069 --> 00:06:28.550
Was there was our through line for you, or was there anything else that you think kept on cropping up for you in?
00:06:28.789 --> 00:06:38.310
And there was a bit around self-care, which came through as a thread for me.
00:06:38.310 --> 00:06:51.670
And I think it's easy to overlook as a leader that you you need to look out for yourself as well, because otherwise, where are you going to get the the drive, the energy to lead things forward as well?
00:06:51.670 --> 00:06:55.269
Edward talked about mind, body, and soul.
00:06:55.269 --> 00:07:02.469
Lucy talked about putting yourself first, and then this developed into a conversation about how do you actually do that.
00:07:02.469 --> 00:07:04.629
There were a few references to people being addicted to their phones.
00:07:04.629 --> 00:07:14.949
I think Lucy talked about one of the biggest changes in education conferences she's been to over the last few years is that you walk into your room and everyone has sat there glued to their phones.
00:07:14.949 --> 00:07:18.149
You know, where do you get your your downtime with that?
00:07:18.149 --> 00:07:20.789
Paul also talked about putting down your phone.
00:07:20.789 --> 00:07:34.469
But there were there were with Edward, Lucy, and Paul, Edward talked about, and this was based on guidance that he'd been given, that sometimes he just goes into his office, tidies his desk, sit down, and look at the wall.
00:07:34.469 --> 00:07:37.189
And that's where you have your thinking time.
00:07:37.189 --> 00:07:42.389
Lucy talks about living in the gaps, and I know this is something we have explored previously, haven't we?
00:07:42.389 --> 00:07:47.670
I think going back to an earlier series, you know, I think it was Edward Peck who said doing nothing is doing something.
00:07:47.670 --> 00:07:51.269
And you and I have always been intrigued by those gaps, haven't we?
00:07:51.269 --> 00:07:53.430
And what you do in those silences.
00:07:53.430 --> 00:08:02.149
Paul talked about time with no purpose, which is a bit of a contradiction in terms, because I think it does have a purpose because it is enabling you to step back from things.
00:08:02.149 --> 00:08:11.110
But I think there is that pressure on a leader to be seen to be doing something to feel like you have things under control, to feel like you have all of the answers.
00:08:11.110 --> 00:08:25.110
But actually, you have to buy yourself time in here to conserve or you know, revitalize energy to make sure you do have time to think and to make sure that you are then ready to go and to go again when you need to.
00:08:25.110 --> 00:08:35.670
So that it was interesting that you you go straight from leading, but part of leading is making sure you're going to be in the right place yourself to lead people through those those moments.
00:08:35.670 --> 00:08:49.350
So, you know, I don't think there's enough focus on looking after yourself as the leader because your natural instinct is to be there and supporting and leading and taking others through whatever gets what whatever gets thrown your way.
00:08:50.149 --> 00:09:01.669
So taking that that theme of looking after yourself, you you obviously led Browne Jacobson for many years, Ian, and carried on leaning in it in different ways.
00:09:01.669 --> 00:09:04.789
What have you learned about looking after your yourself?
00:09:07.350 --> 00:09:18.710
A key part of it is the people that you surround yourself with, the people who give you energy, the people who will be there for you, the people you absolutely want aside you and those those challenged.
00:09:18.710 --> 00:09:22.549
But you know, I think I think energy is a massive part of this.
00:09:22.549 --> 00:09:30.230
And uh going back to that idea of deadlines and adrenaline and so on, leadership doesn't often have all of those moments.
00:09:30.230 --> 00:09:45.669
There's often there's a lot, a long list of stuff to be got through, and therefore you have to plan those bits which are maybe don't play to your natural strengths, and how do you make sure that you work your way through those and don't just gravitate towards the things that that you know you'd rather be doing.
00:09:45.669 --> 00:09:53.269
So there's that there's that stepping, it does give you a time to reflect on what it is that you enjoy doing, what your strengths are, where you do focus your time.
00:09:53.269 --> 00:09:57.750
But uh for me, it comes back to the people that you surround yourself with.
00:09:57.750 --> 00:10:00.149
And I guess that's partly in work and out of work as well.
00:10:00.149 --> 00:10:01.269
How do you get your break?
00:10:01.269 --> 00:10:03.429
I was always quite good at switching off.
00:10:03.429 --> 00:10:09.509
Music is a massive part to me, and it was interesting in in Lucy's discussion as well.
00:10:09.509 --> 00:10:13.509
You know, any it probably drives the rest of my family mad.
00:10:13.509 --> 00:10:15.909
But any moment I can, I will have music in my house.
00:10:15.909 --> 00:10:27.909
I haven't called them planthums before, but I I always have some music, music playing, and that absolutely takes me away from anything that might be top of my mind and helps put things into perspective.
00:10:27.909 --> 00:10:41.110
For different people, it will be exercise, it will be walks, it will be nature, it will be any any of those kind of things, but you do need to it just helps give give you a bit of perspective, doesn't it, on what what needs to be done.
00:10:41.110 --> 00:10:43.590
Give yourself time away from things.
00:10:43.590 --> 00:10:50.309
So and interestingly, and I think these were alluded to as well, we uh and a bit of a diversion.
00:10:50.309 --> 00:10:56.149
I I went to a book launch by Matt Haig about his his latest book called The Midnight Train.
00:10:56.149 --> 00:11:10.549
And in this book, without any plot spoilers, a man goes back through his life and and he realizes that actually the main moments in his life were not necessarily the big achievements or the you know the mountains that were climbed.
00:11:10.549 --> 00:11:15.750
There were quiet moments where maybe he was sat on a park bench and Lucy talks about those simple pleasures.
00:11:15.750 --> 00:11:19.990
And I think there's a bit of us where we all need to work out it isn't all around the next mountain that we've climbed.
00:11:19.990 --> 00:11:28.309
There are moments where you just feel good about where you are and what you're doing that we maybe don't take enough time to notice.
00:11:28.309 --> 00:11:39.029
And with all of the demands, with all of the challenges, with everything that's being choked at you at the phone, I think that I think the um taking chance to enjoy those simple pleasures.
00:11:39.029 --> 00:11:50.309
I can't remember who it was, and it might have been Edward just talked about those those weekend moments where you do just sit down and you're just watching a TV series and actually realizing actually this is this is enjoyable.
00:11:50.309 --> 00:11:59.029
So clearly we all take a pride in our achievements, clearly we all take pride in in getting ourselves out of big challenges, but we need we need to enjoy those simple moments too.
00:12:00.309 --> 00:12:04.950
It's interesting music appealing to you.
00:12:04.950 --> 00:12:20.789
I I I quite enjoy my music, but this music, for example, is used quite a lot in the movies to play with your emotions, and there's something quite human, I think the music can really tap into emotions in a way other things don't necessarily do.
00:12:20.789 --> 00:12:32.950
Do you think there's partly a a release sometimes that in the in the world in where we have to be quite logical, you're rational, you think things throughs, and finding the space for the emotional and the gut.
00:12:32.950 --> 00:12:41.269
Is there something in it that it's freeing up space to have that emotional reaction and lean into emotions a bit when you're listening to music?
00:12:41.909 --> 00:12:45.269
Yes, so definitely, and it's different emotions, isn't it?
00:12:45.269 --> 00:12:52.389
Because sometimes I'll put music on and it's completely even if it's a bit of music that I love, it's the wrong moment, the wrong music for that moment.
00:12:52.389 --> 00:12:58.230
And I listen to as much new music as old music.
00:12:58.230 --> 00:13:08.549
The old music can trigger those nostalgia moments and you remember where you were and all of those things, but I love the challenge of new you know, discovering new things too.
00:13:08.549 --> 00:13:19.110
I I I think I I'm probably leaping forward slightly here though, because I I think I think emotions in work is interesting.
00:13:19.110 --> 00:13:30.710
Lucy talked about, and this is a sort of governance point, that have we lost the ability to debate?
00:13:30.710 --> 00:13:35.669
Have we are there too many moments where conversations are taken personally?
00:13:35.669 --> 00:13:40.470
She talks about you know accusations of why you're always so negative.
00:13:40.470 --> 00:13:55.590
Quite a lot of the people I coach are in an audit or a risk or a legal role, and then they will get that accusation of being too negative and or everything being taken personally, which is where I'm I'm linking it to the the point around emotions.
00:13:55.590 --> 00:13:59.830
But that that for me is a risk at a at a governance level.
00:13:59.830 --> 00:14:10.389
If we can't if converse too much in society at the moment, conversations are about scoring points rather than actually having a genuine, serious discussion and potentially changing someone's mind.
00:14:10.389 --> 00:14:17.029
And if that comes into the workplace in a leadership team, then there is not an open and on this discussion.
00:14:17.029 --> 00:14:31.590
And I think as a as a leader, you need to be right there at the forefront of being able to take feedback, of being able to take criticism as well, just so that you can ensure that within your leadership team things don't get emotional too quickly.
00:14:31.590 --> 00:14:38.149
You do realize you are all on the same side and that challenges, respectful challenge, is healthy.
00:14:38.149 --> 00:14:57.269
So I think that whole piece, I know I've leapt a little bit from music and emotions to emotion in the workplace, but I think we find ourselves at an interesting time there where that fear of upsetting people for people taking things too personally too quickly can get in the way of good decision making.
00:14:57.990 --> 00:15:00.870
I think it's a really interesting observation, Ian.
00:15:00.870 --> 00:15:05.830
Taking that a bit further, perhaps, at the risk of going very far from where we were.
00:15:05.830 --> 00:15:10.629
I think one of the things you can see sometimes is it stops.
00:15:10.629 --> 00:15:23.909
I think you said you that you can't have a good debate and discussion, but it means things get left unsaid because someone cuts in because they they think, oh, I see where Ian's going with this, I'm gonna head him off at the pass and I'll get in now.
00:15:23.909 --> 00:15:27.669
And they may have been right, but there's every chance they were wrong actually.
00:15:27.669 --> 00:15:43.990
And if they'd let you speak and develop the point, you could have been trying to go somewhere else, but we'll never know that because they've answered what they thought the point was because of almost this feeling of point scoring and wanting to make sure that you defend your position.
00:15:43.990 --> 00:15:49.110
So I think it can spread quite wide that that sort of challenge.
00:15:49.509 --> 00:15:52.870
Well, and there's a bit, I don't know whether you're about to excuse me of this.
00:15:52.870 --> 00:15:57.669
Sometimes my thinking develops as I am speaking.
00:15:57.669 --> 00:16:04.710
I don't want to get straight into the introvert-extrovert kind of discussion, but that's definitely a factor.
00:16:04.710 --> 00:16:17.189
So therefore, if someone does cut you off early as your own thinking is developed, you might not you might not have reached your own conclusion and then you you might just sort of get derailed at that point and have to leave things where they are.
00:16:17.189 --> 00:16:24.470
So there's yeah, there's a bit around the governance of the meeting and making sure people feel able to speak as well, isn't there?
00:16:24.470 --> 00:16:53.990
That that is yeah, something that becomes ever more important at a leadership level, whether that's the chair or the chief exec, who needs to make sure that, you know, if if people are sat around a table, that should be because you they're there by right, their contribution should be valued, and you need to make sure they get given the opportunity to to do that, and it should be a safe space for challenge, for honesty, and for making sure people think that are able to debate what is on their mind.
00:16:54.789 --> 00:16:57.750
Can I go back to something you said a few minutes ago?
00:16:57.750 --> 00:17:07.029
You I think you were talking about from say the corporate world and the cut and thrust of a deal in the the deadline to make the decisions.
00:17:07.029 --> 00:17:16.390
But then you also said around then about some of your best coaching is when you're not familiar with the client's context.
00:17:16.390 --> 00:17:30.629
I'm just linking that to something I know you mentioned before about curiosity when you're in an uncertain terrain, and therefore you you actually probably need to have your wits about you a bit more and you are being curious and and lean in.
00:17:30.629 --> 00:17:31.990
Does that resonate?
00:17:32.629 --> 00:17:40.950
Yeah, and that chimes in with something that Edward was was talking about on this.
00:17:40.950 --> 00:17:46.869
There's a challenge in leadership, isn't there, with with that?
00:17:46.869 --> 00:17:48.230
Do you need to know all the answers?
00:17:48.230 --> 00:17:50.150
Do you need to be completely under control?
00:17:50.150 --> 00:18:01.750
He talks about some of the collaboration that they do, where absolutely open book about this is where we are, this is where we find ourselves, uh absolute honesty about as an organization.
00:18:01.750 --> 00:18:13.589
And sometimes as a as a leader, you don't necessarily want to share what's and all where you are as an organization, or leap into the unknown as to who you might be discussing those with us, to to to to where they go to.
00:18:13.589 --> 00:18:18.470
So I think there's there's a piece there that is interesting.
00:18:18.470 --> 00:18:31.589
Paul also talks about curiosity, and he has a brilliant phrase where you know, as he goes to bed, he's interested in a thing he doesn't know that he will learn about tomorrow.
00:18:31.589 --> 00:18:40.629
And I think in a world I was, you know, a a friend asked me if I could have a conversation with their daughter about a career in law.
00:18:40.629 --> 00:18:47.990
And I've never felt less certain what a career, you know, a future career in law looks like.
00:18:47.990 --> 00:19:03.349
But for people who are curious about how things work, for people who want to carry on learning, for me, these are the skills that will see people forward into whatever the future world of work looks like.
00:19:03.349 --> 00:19:09.589
And people have to embrace that step into the unknown and see where things take them.
00:19:09.589 --> 00:19:18.869
And that can be a challenge as a leader because you feel this responsibility for the organization that you're in and you know, where the world is heading.
00:19:18.869 --> 00:19:27.349
But I think it's something that that needs to be embraced and see where things get see where things get taken to, you know.
00:19:27.349 --> 00:19:39.349
I think again it might have been Edward who talked about, you know, innovation and trying things and and maybe you aim for the top right hand corner of the goal 20 times and 19 times you miss.
00:19:39.349 --> 00:19:54.869
But if you score that one goal and you make that that thing change, then as an organization, that is what the future is going to be like, you know, that's not around feel of failure, but if you can make that one thing land, then you know that's where we need where we need to head.
00:19:55.910 --> 00:20:02.150
So I I'll put a different theme on on the table of something that that struck me.
00:20:02.150 --> 00:20:12.390
And in the I think it probably was more in the second half of the series, I found myself kept coming back and asking guests about the moment things turned.
00:20:12.390 --> 00:20:22.950
Perhaps you would expect to hear talk of strategies, data, decisions made under pressure, but I think what I actually heard was talk about rooms.
00:20:22.950 --> 00:20:31.109
Bear with me a moment, but they were they were talking about specific moments in specific rooms when something shifted.
00:20:31.109 --> 00:20:35.430
They they just knew it before they could actually explain it.
00:20:35.430 --> 00:20:55.670
So Steve described it in the sense that he told his staff that he'd been crying in the garden during COVID, unable to fix what was broken, and his son came up to him and put his arm around him, and he told him nobody could, and that that was just a real moment for Steve.
00:20:55.670 --> 00:21:04.470
And that impacted him that he he decided to tell his leadership team and because he thought you know they deserved the honesty.
00:21:04.470 --> 00:21:14.470
And you you might think that perhaps what might come back wasn't was sympathy, but it wasn't, it was recognition that everybody in the room was carrying the same thing.
00:21:14.470 --> 00:21:32.470
But him telling that story surfaced it as a collective understanding that was perhaps there under the surface, but now was oak that was out there, and and Janet Smith, I think she gave really three three good examples, I think.
00:21:32.470 --> 00:21:38.309
And what was I think really interesting is she was she was able to recall the details really, really clearly.
00:21:38.309 --> 00:21:43.509
And I think there's something in the fact that someone can tell a story from knowing when it turns really clearly.
00:21:43.509 --> 00:21:47.109
That that I think in itself is fascinating and telling.
00:21:47.109 --> 00:21:59.750
So she referenced a moment, uh turnaround college in Manchester, where at the end of a long day, a a group of managers laughed at something absurd on screen.
00:21:59.750 --> 00:22:05.109
And she just felt in that moment it was a shift from they to we.
00:22:05.109 --> 00:22:07.269
It sort of it it felt.
00:22:07.269 --> 00:22:09.589
No, there's a there's an us here.
00:22:09.589 --> 00:22:26.390
And she also talked about a moment, I think in a a current college, about an offstead grade, and the college had had had struggled for a number of years, and she sent out the message and then she just heard these cheers from from the corridor.
00:22:26.390 --> 00:22:31.509
And so she couldn't see them, wasn't the same space, but she found that quite impactful.
00:22:31.509 --> 00:22:41.029
She also talked as well, I think about I don't think it was long after that actually, the same college about so I think it was reaffirming it.
00:22:41.029 --> 00:22:47.269
She was watching Staff Cry when they announced a £250 bonus, a Christmas gathering.
00:22:47.269 --> 00:22:59.029
I don't know they ever really had gatherings before when they're and it wasn't because of the money, it was because and she said somebody said it to her directly, nobody's ever done something like that for us before.
00:22:59.029 --> 00:23:04.230
And it was that that moment of being seen.
00:23:04.230 --> 00:23:19.430
And I think yeah, I found those interesting because they're sort of they feel like moments of catching that intangible of when a team stops being a collection of people working together in a building and something actually feels that they belong to, it's uh us.
00:23:20.150 --> 00:23:25.910
And it it's interesting, those are gonna be sound a a bit contrary here.
00:23:25.910 --> 00:23:32.390
Those moments aren't always in it's easier in those moments which are a bit celebratory.
00:23:32.390 --> 00:23:57.029
But actually, sometimes coming back to some of the darker moments, when you realize that everyone is alongside you, trying to pull yourself out of whatever hole you have found yourself in, there are moments there which are massively, I was about to say reassuring, it's probably the wrong word, but where you realize, yeah, we really are a collective here.
00:23:57.029 --> 00:23:59.910
Sometimes as a leader, you can feel quite exposed in those positions.
00:23:59.910 --> 00:24:04.309
Crikey, how have I let us find ourselves in this position?
00:24:04.309 --> 00:24:11.509
And that moment when you Yeah, I think I think it you you learn a lot about organizations in a time of crisis.
00:24:11.509 --> 00:24:32.309
And when you're in a time of crisis and you realize that absolutely everyone is alongside you trying to pull out of it, I think are those moments too, because you realize you've you've created that sense of belonging and it's easy to belong in the successful years, but when people are belonging in the tougher times, that means something.
00:24:33.750 --> 00:24:35.269
It's interesting.
00:24:35.269 --> 00:24:40.309
Steve also talked about that meeting culture.
00:24:40.309 --> 00:24:48.869
Now, this isn't, I don't think, just related to tough decisions, but and he actually they actually have a a name for it, a form of word, so not unique.
00:24:48.869 --> 00:24:59.829
But they they talked about pause to go faster, and he talked about anybody can call it, and that when you're just there as a group trying to work through something and just someone can hang on a minute, let's just pause to go faster here.
00:24:59.829 --> 00:25:01.109
What are we flying past?
00:25:01.109 --> 00:25:07.190
And that that felt to me something quite important to being a genuine team.
00:25:07.190 --> 00:25:23.269
Because going back to what you're saying about governance, sometimes meetings can feel quite performative or people are playing a role, the word the script isn't perfectly written, but the general role is outlined, and you you add lib and then you get there, but things are left unsaid, and you can't do that.
00:25:23.269 --> 00:25:28.629
So that I found that really fascinating that they almost had had a name for it.
00:25:28.629 --> 00:25:38.549
And as I said, there's not a unique form of words, but if that's culturally like anyone has permission in a group to go, hang on a minute, let's just pause so we can go faster.
00:25:38.549 --> 00:25:40.470
I thought was fascinating.
00:25:40.950 --> 00:25:43.670
No, and I confession again.
00:25:43.670 --> 00:25:47.109
I could remember meetings I was just glad to get through.
00:25:47.109 --> 00:25:50.470
And the purpose of them was getting through the end or getting to the end.
00:25:50.470 --> 00:25:53.349
Was that really the best use of everybody's time?
00:25:53.349 --> 00:25:56.309
You know, was that a meeting that really needed to happen?
00:25:56.309 --> 00:26:05.269
And we've probably all had those moments, but it is interesting to reflect afterwards have you done service, have you done justice to everyone who was there together at that point?
00:26:05.269 --> 00:26:09.829
And have you really worked out what that time was best used for?
00:26:09.829 --> 00:26:31.670
So it is, yeah, I think meetings are are I don't uh I think it might have been Paul who talked about, you know, trying to reduce meetings, and then one of his team members commented, but that's the only time I managed to catch up with this particular colleague, which sort of made him stop and think and he found other ways to.
00:26:31.670 --> 00:26:38.150
I think he bought them all, sorted them all canteen vouchers so they could all go to the canteen, but they had to be paired up with someone else.
00:26:38.150 --> 00:26:46.950
Um which is right, it wasn't the meeting, wasn't the solution to people meeting up, but it was interesting what different I think there are different perceptions of what meetings are for.
00:26:46.950 --> 00:26:53.269
And I think as a leader you can get fixed into, and as I say, being being honest occasions where there were meetings that are just needed to be got through.
00:26:53.269 --> 00:26:56.309
But actually, what was the purpose of that meeting for everyone else in there?
00:26:56.309 --> 00:27:06.710
And there might have been there are probably different reasons for those people being in there, and have you stepped back enough and worked out what you want to achieve with a meeting rather than just something that needs to be ticked off?
00:27:06.710 --> 00:27:08.230
Yeah.
00:27:08.549 --> 00:27:10.950
Going back to the theme of curiosity for a moment.
00:27:10.950 --> 00:27:23.509
I I I want to different degrees, there'll be lots of talking, leadership and management discourse about building culture, about engagement, about trust, psychological safety.
00:27:23.509 --> 00:27:26.309
These are all things I think we can recognise.
00:27:26.309 --> 00:27:35.670
I do wonder whether we talk enough about that specific moment that that that moment you feel the organization become us.
00:27:35.670 --> 00:27:39.750
Because I I wonder if you felt it, do you know what created it?
00:27:39.750 --> 00:27:43.910
And you possibly will never know the answer to it, but I think it's an interesting question to ask.
00:27:43.910 --> 00:27:46.950
Because I think sometimes you might be, oh, that's great, we've got that.
00:27:46.950 --> 00:27:52.069
I do wonder whether it would be interesting to try and capture and go, ooh, what created that?
00:27:52.069 --> 00:28:01.430
And I said it may be one of those questions you can never answer, but I think trying to answer a question like that it in and of itself could be quite revealing and fascinating.
00:28:01.910 --> 00:28:06.150
Yeah, and it it probably evolves over time, doesn't it?
00:28:06.150 --> 00:28:12.789
I um it's probably different as a new leader as to someone who's been in position for a while.
00:28:12.789 --> 00:28:29.190
You you you talked to Edward around the challenge of from an accountancy background coming and leading an education organization and what you know, did it feel like an outsider?
00:28:29.190 --> 00:28:30.629
What were the challenges within that?
00:28:30.629 --> 00:28:43.910
Which made me which made me stop and think around some of those challenges, because I guess your relationship with the people around you has to evolve over you know that initial skepticism that there might be.
00:28:43.910 --> 00:28:53.109
What was interesting was then listening to Lucy straight after that, because you know, Lucy's background in risk and disaster and so on.
00:28:53.109 --> 00:29:10.950
I realized I'd already got a preconceived idea of what Lucy was going to be like, and then she bounds in like a ray of light and energy and so on, and and that made me stop and think hard about you know how quickly I was leading to a preconceived view of how someone is, and something you and I have talked about in coaching before.
00:29:10.950 --> 00:29:27.430
You know, when I coach someone, I like to not know much about them or their organization before I have the first meeting because that way they are a bit more of a blank canvas to me, and and I hopefully get a more honest view of what they're like before their 360 reports get rolled out to me or any of their assessments get rolled out to me.
00:29:27.430 --> 00:29:38.390
But it did make me, you know, as a as a leader, you might have your own view of how you've perceived, but it it how do you actually work out how everyone else is perceiving you and how they want you to behave in any particular moment?
00:29:38.390 --> 00:29:45.910
And and as leaders, you I guess you get you get more adept at adept at adapting to particular circumstances, but it can be a challenge, can't it?
00:29:45.910 --> 00:29:51.029
Trying to second guess what people expect of you and how that evolves over time.
00:29:51.990 --> 00:29:52.869
Indeed.
00:29:52.869 --> 00:30:05.269
I suppose you can have so many different audiences as well, where at that moment you could have quite a lot almost being asked of you in a leader for different people needing different things.
00:30:05.269 --> 00:30:11.910
There's always a danger in episode like this where you're doing a retrospective of lots of agreement.
00:30:11.910 --> 00:30:18.390
Although I think we've I don't think we've had tension, but we have got we've got under the skin of a few things where there might have been difference.
00:30:18.390 --> 00:30:35.430
But I did want to I was reflecting back on the series and going, where where perhaps were there some areas of tension between some of what was said, and you know, I think I mentioned it with my episode with Lucy.
00:30:35.430 --> 00:30:44.950
I talked to Lucy about paradoxes, and actually sometimes sitting with something uncomfortable where something you think is a paradox actually isn't a paradox, it's just you haven't looked at it hard enough.
00:30:44.950 --> 00:30:48.309
But when you look at it hard enough, you can resolve your paradox.
00:30:48.309 --> 00:30:50.789
So it may be that we can resolve the tension I'm about to.
00:30:51.190 --> 00:30:54.470
I think she said to you two things can be right at the same time, can't they?
00:30:54.470 --> 00:30:56.390
Sometimes it feels like they are.
00:30:56.390 --> 00:30:57.829
How can they both be the case?
00:30:57.829 --> 00:31:01.829
But you know, it's that stepping back and working out actually that both of those things can be true.
00:31:02.069 --> 00:31:03.829
She absolutely did, yeah.
00:31:03.829 --> 00:31:32.069
So Steve West he opened with one of the most vulnerable moments in the series where he talked about crying in the garden and able to fix what was broken, and his his son's arm around him, and he he said it explicitly that leadership has uh has to find a way of connecting and being emotionally intelligent and not being afraid to show vulnerability, and that story he then told to his staff becoming the thing that connected everyone that I just mentioned a moment ago.
00:31:32.069 --> 00:31:38.150
But Andy Long noticed something else that pulls against it.
00:31:38.150 --> 00:31:47.269
He described himself as being the calmest person in the room throughout COVID, and and he reflected that sometimes people actually need you to show some emotion back.
00:31:47.269 --> 00:31:55.990
So that was his natural approach was calmness, and so you know, which is absolutely a genuine strength, but also could be a distance.
00:31:55.990 --> 00:32:06.150
So he was noticing, talked, I think, about learning to perform emotion he was actually feeling just to give others permission to feel it too.
00:32:06.549 --> 00:32:09.109
But that that feels like a contradiction though, doesn't it?
00:32:09.109 --> 00:32:14.710
Because my natural instinct is in a scenario like that, wouldn't you want your leader to be calm?
00:32:14.710 --> 00:32:19.750
So again, it does lead to a bit of a tension as to how how should he behave.
00:32:19.750 --> 00:32:29.829
A, you'd want to be authentic, and if he is genuinely calm, you know, that don't worry, we've got this kind of approach, you would hope would be reassuring to people.
00:32:29.829 --> 00:32:37.190
So yeah, it's it's an interesting one as to how how we should have behaved in that scenario.
00:32:37.509 --> 00:32:48.150
But I think that the one way of describing intention is there's a vulnerability that is real and shown can really galvanize and it can cross the rubicon.
00:32:48.150 --> 00:32:56.069
But leaders also carry a responsibility not to transfer their own uncertainty onto people who might need steadiness.
00:32:56.069 --> 00:33:00.549
And yeah, I suppose the trick is how do you judge what the moment calls for?
00:33:00.710 --> 00:33:03.349
Which moment you've got to be authentic as well, isn't it?
00:33:03.349 --> 00:33:15.190
You can you I mean it if it if he presents as being calm, but actually there is levels of uncertainty underneath that he just allows to come out, then that's fine.
00:33:15.190 --> 00:33:21.589
Doing something a bit more performative isn't gonna convince anyone, I wouldn't have thought in those moments, is it?
00:33:21.589 --> 00:33:26.150
So there's a real yeah, there's a there's a balance to be struck there that feels quite a challenge.
00:33:26.710 --> 00:33:27.349
Yeah.
00:33:27.349 --> 00:33:36.470
The we have come a few times in this conversation to crises and sort of moments of tension.
00:33:36.470 --> 00:33:42.710
I think it was Lucy talked about preparing.
00:33:42.710 --> 00:33:58.390
I'm trying to remember the form of words she used about the the fact that crisis will happen, but what you need to do is you need to reduce sort of have the muscle recognition to to get there so that it's not got quite as much stigma and that you're not having an immediate moment of panic.
00:33:58.710 --> 00:33:59.190
Yeah.
00:33:59.190 --> 00:34:02.710
And then she also talked about bad health, didn't she?
00:34:02.710 --> 00:34:15.269
At that point, you know, often it isn't the moment of obviously often it isn't the crisis that turns out to be the longer term problem, but how you respond to that crisis.
00:34:15.269 --> 00:34:25.350
And I absolutely recognise that because the mistakes happen is how you respond to those mistakes.
00:34:25.350 --> 00:34:41.910
And in a regulated environment like we were in, you need people to have that assurance that if a make mistake does happen, the organization will be alongside them to sort it out.
00:34:41.910 --> 00:34:54.150
Because otherwise, if if if someone make does something wrong and they think the organization is gonna come down on them like a ton of bricks, they will not open up, they will not involve people and they will make the position worse.
00:34:54.150 --> 00:35:00.070
So, you know, I think that bit around, as you said, bad bad help, but how you respond to it.
00:35:00.070 --> 00:35:09.270
And again, I think that tells a lot about an organization, as I say, you can't, I think Lucy says, you can't rule out every instant that's gonna happen.
00:35:09.270 --> 00:35:16.870
But you have to make sure that people know they're in a supported environment and you know, collectively they'll work their way through it.
00:35:16.870 --> 00:35:20.390
If it happens a second and a third time, maybe that's gets slightly different than that.
00:35:20.390 --> 00:35:29.190
But you know, again, I think that's that is it about about an organization pulling together, working together to to find their way through things.
00:35:30.230 --> 00:35:33.590
We haven't got too too much longer left, Ian.
00:35:33.590 --> 00:35:42.790
I was wanting to ask, is there a a moment that has perhaps stayed with you from the series?
00:35:42.790 --> 00:35:45.590
Not not a theme, but something more specific than that.
00:35:45.590 --> 00:35:50.070
A single story, a line, exchange, a person, something.
00:35:50.950 --> 00:36:06.310
Well, the I loved Lucy's opening story about her wedding in New York, which might not be the example that you wanted me to come up with, but it does remind you that sometimes stars can alive in an amazingly positive way.
00:36:06.310 --> 00:36:12.950
And sometimes you can be lucky as a leader, and you need to make the most of those moments, too.
00:36:12.950 --> 00:36:18.550
So I'm not answering your question with one, but there are things which particularly resonate with me.
00:36:18.550 --> 00:36:25.990
That self-help, that taking time, that stepping back, that time with no purpose.
00:36:25.990 --> 00:36:34.150
The two phrases that stayed with me are time with no purpose, and being interested in a thing I don't know that I will learn tomorrow.
00:36:34.150 --> 00:36:37.830
They resonate with me because they're already things I believe in.
00:36:37.830 --> 00:37:06.390
The one that stayed with me that I am trying to ponder and work through is that bit about behaviors at a board level and a governance level, and how we make sure we get that back to an honest ability to debate, to discuss, to accept criticism, to make sure everyone understands that they're on the same team, because that's the best way that an organization will lead itself on.
00:37:06.390 --> 00:37:11.350
So there's moments there that resonate, but you probably know because they they chime with very much where I am as a person.
00:37:11.350 --> 00:37:14.390
There's a bit there though, that we're both interested in governance, aren't we?
00:37:14.390 --> 00:37:16.470
We're both interested in decision making.
00:37:16.470 --> 00:37:26.310
And Lucy alluded to something there that I do I do sometimes see in meetings I attend or observe, and how do we get that back on track?
00:37:26.310 --> 00:37:35.990
There was also a reference that Edward said about stop being British, that a client had made to him, sorry, a contact had made to him.
00:37:35.990 --> 00:37:41.830
Now we could probably create a whole new podcast on what being British means just at the moment, but let's not go there.
00:37:41.830 --> 00:37:57.110
I think there is that bit about do we often do we sometimes take enough pride in what we've achieved as an organization and how good we are, and using that as an opportunity to open doors and to push the organization forward, which I think the context that was used here.
00:37:57.110 --> 00:38:08.710
So yeah, there's that that piece about making sure that we make make sure we know those moments about how good you are and as an organization and use that to your advantage.
00:38:08.710 --> 00:38:14.150
So yeah, I I've picked a few elements there, some which shine with me and some which I think are a useful challenge.
00:38:14.150 --> 00:38:15.590
I'm gonna turn it back to you though.
00:38:15.590 --> 00:38:20.070
So is there something that's particularly stayed with you out of this series?
00:38:25.510 --> 00:38:37.270
The honest one is probably one that I almost wouldn't share, but it's probably worth explaining why, because the reason why it stayed with me perhaps is is behind that.
00:38:37.270 --> 00:38:50.870
So earlier well actually it was at the end of last year, I had an accident that put me on my back, literally, for longer than I I wanted, and I couldn't do much, I couldn't rush anywhere.
00:38:50.870 --> 00:38:58.870
In that enforced stillness, the kind you definitely don't choose, you can't negotiate with either.
00:38:58.870 --> 00:39:04.390
I found myself thinking differently, more slowly.
00:39:04.390 --> 00:39:11.270
I think perhaps about things that I'd perhaps sped past in in the past with the speed to go on.
00:39:11.270 --> 00:39:17.670
I was uh I happened ironically to be listening to Lucy's audiobook.
00:39:17.670 --> 00:39:45.110
I'd agreed with Lucy to record the podcast uh literally about three days before my accident, and I'd I'd I'd I'd had uh been listening to her book, and so I think the moment is probably more my moment than it is a guest's moment, but near the end of that conversation with Lucy, I brought something I'd been sitting with for some time since listening to a book.
00:39:45.110 --> 00:39:49.270
And actually you alluded to it a lot earlier in this conversation, Ian.
00:39:49.270 --> 00:40:01.430
Because I I I told her about my very first guest, Fiona Forbes, who years ago had said a phrase that just still I've recorded that three years over three years ago, I think now, and it just has stayed with me.
00:40:01.430 --> 00:40:03.990
She's like, look for the gaps.
00:40:03.990 --> 00:40:07.190
There's sometimes more in the gaps than what's said and done.
00:40:07.190 --> 00:40:14.070
And you know, that idea really resonated with me and has travelled with me through every series.
00:40:14.070 --> 00:40:21.590
But when I heard Lucy talking about not looking for the gaps, but living in the gaps, it sort of really made me stuck.
00:40:21.590 --> 00:40:40.230
And remember the moment when I was listening to it now, and it it felt like it was going one step further than that, not just noticing the gap, but and not just trying to read it, but choosing to live in it, inhabit it, and being present inside the uncertainty, rather than rushing ahead.
00:40:40.230 --> 00:40:57.350
And I'd I'd all I'd also been reading a a lovely book by a Buddhist teacher who I think he he writes, we're neither our feelings nor the story our mind tells us to make sense of them, with the vast silence that knows of our feelings, emergence and their disappearance.
00:40:57.350 --> 00:41:13.670
And I just absolutely I don't know, it just resonates with me a lot at the moment and just loves that that idea of the site it feels to me like a superpower if you can get that as a human of understanding you're not your thoughts, you're the consciousness that recognises them coming and going.
00:41:13.670 --> 00:41:23.750
So, yeah, three three different ideas, two from episodes in the podcast, one just from outside reading, but they seem to be reaching for the same thing.
00:41:23.750 --> 00:41:28.150
And I brought this up with Lucy, and she I think what she said back was just perfect.
00:41:28.150 --> 00:41:49.270
She talked about the whole premise of a lot of her work is that people are initially confronted by it, and then they have to work out what they feel, and that the value is in the space, the thinking, the time to give difficult thoughts rather than to rush to resolve them, which I think is why I mentioned to you about paradoxes a a short while ago.
00:41:49.270 --> 00:42:01.510
So, yeah, I think the accident taught me to, in its blunt and very unwelcome way, was you don't get to rush recovery, you don't get to perform being fine, you just have to be in it until you're not.
00:42:01.510 --> 00:42:16.470
And you you can't schedule that, you can't plan it in, you can't get it in before your holiday, you can't get it in before Christmas, or and yeah, so I think I'm I'm still working out and thinking about what living in the gaps means for me in practice.
00:42:16.470 --> 00:42:26.790
But yeah, I find myself returning to it in in difficult conversations, in decisions, not sure about in moments where the pressure is to act.
00:42:26.790 --> 00:42:29.590
I reckon you could you could probably recognise that.
00:42:29.590 --> 00:42:35.030
I think we've spoken about that before, but sometimes that something quieter says, hang on, just wait.
00:42:35.750 --> 00:42:50.950
And do you think people I mean sorry I'm taking this from obviously a very personal experience that you had and a very enforced gap, but I I don't know that people are comfortable with gaps, and we will see this again with coaching that you know, are people comfortable with silences?
00:42:50.950 --> 00:42:58.870
But this almost comes back, it's a bit trite to take it back to to mobile phones, but when there's a gap, people will pick their phones up.
00:42:58.870 --> 00:43:03.830
You know, that that there's people we live in a world where there aren't gaps.
00:43:03.830 --> 00:43:09.910
And I think where there is a gap, people immediately look to fill it rather than actually enjoying that moment.
00:43:09.910 --> 00:43:20.870
Enjoy probably the wrong word given what you've you've discussed, but making the most of those moments and actually giving you a chance to to pause, take stock, and look at things.
00:43:20.870 --> 00:43:29.430
I think there is so much information that we're being bombarded with that that almost becomes our default position.
00:43:29.430 --> 00:43:46.070
We're used to being, you know, sorry to bring my kids into this, but you know, you'll be you'll be sat there watching a TV program and you're you'll turn around and kids are on the phone or you know, trying to do their homework or whatever at the same time, and you just think, whoa, hang on, we're trying to do too much with ourselves.
00:43:46.070 --> 00:43:53.430
And I think the uh in all its different meanings of the word gap, it would be good to find ourselves back to.
00:43:53.430 --> 00:44:06.870
And I think this does link to those simpler pleasures we could do with retracing our way back to uh those times where we're not looking to fill every every moment and to bombard ourselves with information, opinions.
00:44:07.750 --> 00:44:15.270
Yeah I think there's an irony there of it's incredibly simple to just live in the gap, stay in the silent, but it's so hard to do.
00:44:15.270 --> 00:44:28.310
And actually the you know, certain situations it can actually be quite courageous because if it's difficult decisions or feelings, sitting and holding those feelings and examining them and trying to get through them can be quite quite challenging.
00:44:28.310 --> 00:44:38.470
I know not every decision or or gap would necessarily be like that, but um but yeah, perhaps then to end on on something which I hope may be uplifting.
00:44:38.470 --> 00:44:42.710
Well I wanted I asked a few of the guests in the series.
00:44:42.710 --> 00:45:08.230
I s I asked them towards the end, what quality do you see in young people coming through now, whether it's your own children or it's young people you see in work or elsewhere that you wish you had or you you has wish you had more of I'll answer with a jokey answer which will buy me time.
00:45:08.470 --> 00:45:21.990
I wish I could remember stuff the way that they can soak up information, but maybe I I could I could at one point that ability to this is despite what we've just said about gaps, that ability to just absorb and process.
00:45:21.990 --> 00:45:34.230
I think maybe this there's there's a link there, so so uh this is a a stepping stone on the way to the answer.
00:45:34.230 --> 00:45:42.310
I think there is a bit within education that and I like to see with my kids is is the critical thinking piece.
00:45:42.310 --> 00:45:50.150
So you are you are bombarded with all of that information, but how do you make sure we've got the critical thinking to challenge everything that is being thrown at you?
00:45:50.150 --> 00:45:58.790
It's interesting actually, some of the guests talking about AI and how we use AI and the fact we've all got to embrace how it goes, but it does lead to the next point.
00:45:58.790 --> 00:46:02.390
But how can we critically challenge what AI is telling us?
00:46:02.390 --> 00:46:11.270
And maybe that is a route through back to debate and discussion because actually it's uh something that doesn't necessarily have a personality in the face telling you things.
00:46:11.270 --> 00:46:24.310
So I enjoy that ability to debate with children around things and to make sure they're properly thinking things through rather than having it put through.
00:46:24.310 --> 00:46:31.990
But actually, I um a lot of this theme has been around stories, telling the ability to tell stories.
00:46:31.990 --> 00:46:38.870
And I think that sounds a bit trying, but uh kids are brilliant at telling stories.
00:46:38.870 --> 00:46:41.430
And do we value that enough?
00:46:41.430 --> 00:46:44.950
A lot of our your I might say your best guests.
00:46:44.950 --> 00:46:49.510
I haven't got a league table, but the storytellers are the best guests, aren't they?
00:46:49.510 --> 00:47:07.910
And when actually, when I think about it, coming back to what we've talked about before about looking at the world of the future and curiosity and so on, I actually think have we ruled out that storytelling is a key part of that, and clearly it comes through into authenticity and so on.
00:47:07.910 --> 00:47:11.910
But there is nothing I love more than my kids telling me a brilliant story.
00:47:11.910 --> 00:47:24.310
And actually, I think us teaching kids to develop those skills, because that is again how they will take people with them in the future, that is how they will become the leaders of the future, isn't it?
00:47:24.310 --> 00:47:31.990
By actually being able to turn facts or circumstances into something that is very human and that people would want to follow them with.
00:47:31.990 --> 00:47:37.270
So yeah, I hadn't expected that to be my answer, and it was a bit of a roundabout way of getting there.
00:47:37.270 --> 00:47:41.510
But yeah, storytelling feels like a good note to end on.
00:47:41.750 --> 00:47:42.950
I love storytelling.
00:47:42.950 --> 00:47:46.550
It's come up a number of times just in conversations.
00:47:46.550 --> 00:47:47.270
I think you're right.
00:47:47.270 --> 00:47:49.990
I'm not sure it's spoken about or valued as much.
00:47:49.990 --> 00:48:04.230
And I don't I don't think good storytelling needs to be sort of polished to perfection, Hollywood style telling a story, but just authentic and human and conveying is I think what you're getting at.
00:48:04.230 --> 00:48:21.190
Um if I was gonna have a have a go at this, I think I I think it's perhaps a bit linked to some of what you were saying, but it what I see in young people is they they seem to have a comfort with not knowing everything in a in a different way.
00:48:21.190 --> 00:48:38.470
Sometimes there will be anxiety, but lots of time there is there's not anxiety about uncertainty that they're they're less detached to having the answer and more interested in the question, and I've seen more questions, and I think you said earlier about curiosity.
00:48:38.470 --> 00:48:51.270
So, and I think there can be that temptation to pretend you're certain about something, and that you know, I certainly uh think I would have fallen into that to that trap.
00:48:51.270 --> 00:49:03.750
But I think yeah, I've I've I've learned it's still a journey, I know it's a hackney phrase, but that working out and being curious and not pretending that you've got certainty.
00:49:03.750 --> 00:49:05.350
You know, we talked about a moment ago.
00:49:05.350 --> 00:49:17.990
Livy Lucy talked about living in the gaps, and I think that that willingness, as we were just talking about, to stay in an uncomfortable space long enough to be curious and let something real emerge is something I wish I had more of and see.
00:49:17.990 --> 00:49:20.550
I definitely see in in young people.
00:49:20.550 --> 00:49:22.870
So still definitely learn learning that.
00:49:22.870 --> 00:49:29.990
Well, I think we're out of out of time, so I think we'll need uh to end it on that note.
00:49:29.990 --> 00:49:32.230
Ian, thank you so much for joining me today.
00:49:32.230 --> 00:49:34.070
I've thoroughly enjoyed the discussion.
00:49:34.070 --> 00:49:36.310
I hope our listeners have as well.
00:49:36.310 --> 00:49:49.190
And we we obviously couldn't cover every moment from what I thought was a great series, eight conversations with people who were as ever wonderfully generous with their time and their honest reflections and storytelling, Ian.
00:49:49.190 --> 00:49:50.470
Some wonderful stories.
00:49:50.470 --> 00:49:55.430
So yeah, if you've enjoyed the series, please do follow the show so you don't miss what comes next.
00:49:55.430 --> 00:49:56.870
But thanks again, Ian.
00:49:57.110 --> 00:49:57.830
No, thank you.
00:49:57.830 --> 00:49:58.550
It's been good.
00:49:58.550 --> 00:50:01.350
And uh left me with plenty to ponder on as well.
00:50:01.510 --> 00:50:05.110
So superb, a wonderful note to finish.
00:50:05.270 --> 00:50:06.630
Yeah, thank you.