이 에피소드에 관해
In this episode Courtney and Sandy welcome Connie Hamilton, author and consultant, to discuss the power of well-crafted coaching questions. Connie explains how to create a cognitive journey for teachers, balance coaching and consulting roles, normalize imperfection, and use targeted follow-up questions to deepen reflection and instructional growth.
Listeners get practical strategies: focus deeply on one instructional goal, use metacognitive prompts (How will you know? What will tell you to pivot?), offer multiple options as a menu, and gather data to inform coaching conversations. Resources are available at ConnieHamilton.org.
Episode Description:
In this episode of C3: Connecting Coaches & Cognition, we sit down with Connie Hamilton, an experienced educator, author, and consultant, to explore the art and science of instructional coaching. Connie shares her journey through various roles in education—from classroom teacher to principal to assistant superintendent—and how those experiences inform her approach to supporting teachers.
We dive deep into the power of well-crafted coaching questions, discussing how they can spark reflection, build teacher efficacy, and create a culture of continuous improvement. Connie offers practical strategies for balancing coaching and consulting roles, supporting new teachers, and fostering collective efficacy within schools.
Listeners will gain actionable insights on:
- How to frame coaching questions that promote metacognitive thinking and reflection
- The balance between curiosity and guidance in coaching conversations
- Strategies for normalizing imperfection and embracing iterative teaching
- Techniques for observing and analyzing classroom data to support teacher growth
- Approaches to working with both new and experienced teachers, including emotional support and building confidence
Connie also shares a free resource on her website, SIFT Data Descriptions, which provides practical ways for coaches to collect and use classroom data to guide instructional conversations.
Rapid Fire Highlights:
- One coaching strategy to always have: Identify the most challenging part of a lesson and reflect on what to keep or adjust for next time.
- Advice for new teachers: Focus on student learning as the true measure of lesson success, not just busyness or adherence to a plan.
Connect with Connie Hamilton:
Website: www.conniehamilton.org
Free Resources: Available on her website, including SIFT Data Descriptions
Timestamps (Approximate):
- 0:00 – Introduction & Connie’s background in education
- 5:30 – The power of well-crafted coaching questions
- 15:00 – Balancing curiosity and guidance as a coach
- 23:00 – Strategies for deeper teacher reflection
- 32:00 – Working with new teachers and supporting emotional states
- 42:00 – One habit coaches can start tomorrow to be more intentional
50:00 – Rapid fire tips & final thoughts
노트보기 🔗
전사 🔗
00:00:17.269 --> 00:00:20.269
Welcome back to another episode of C3. I'm Courtney Groskin,
00:00:20.389 --> 00:00:25.129
and I'm here with... Sandy Heiser. Sandy, what's going on? What's new?
00:00:25.989 --> 00:00:30.749
Oh, you know, it's busy, busy. School's in full swing.
00:00:31.109 --> 00:00:36.729
You and I are getting ready to facilitate day five of cognitive coaching.
00:00:37.529 --> 00:00:43.329
Yeah, luckily that's a review day, so not a lot of heavy lifting for us to learn new content.
00:00:44.089 --> 00:00:48.269
I know, but we've got to study up. Yes, yes, we do.
00:00:49.767 --> 00:00:53.387
It'll be nice. It'll be nice to see our people again and reconnect with our
00:00:53.387 --> 00:00:57.587
group from that Cognitive Coaching Seminar Foundations.
00:00:58.067 --> 00:01:01.667
Yeah, we had a little bit of a break there. So now we're reconnecting and jumping
00:01:01.667 --> 00:01:03.127
into days five through eight.
00:01:03.907 --> 00:01:07.967
And we have a big cohort. It'll be nice to see them all finish this out.
00:01:08.627 --> 00:01:12.607
Yeah, it's been nice. We've gotten some good feedback from them about that they're
00:01:12.607 --> 00:01:18.207
using some of the principles of coaching in their daily lives, which is so nice to hear.
00:01:19.167 --> 00:01:22.987
Yeah, I'd say that's my favorite part of facilitating is the text messages I
00:01:22.987 --> 00:01:24.887
get from people saying, I tried it.
00:01:25.027 --> 00:01:27.387
We had a reflecting conversation. It was amazing.
00:01:28.087 --> 00:01:32.507
Yeah, I tried it. It works. What about you, Courtney? What is new in your world?
00:01:33.407 --> 00:01:38.007
Busy, busy time for sure. I just yesterday had the opportunity to take one of
00:01:38.007 --> 00:01:43.467
our new teachers out to another site so she could get to see some similar grade
00:01:43.467 --> 00:01:46.687
level classrooms and just get an idea and a feel for St.
00:01:46.787 --> 00:01:51.047
Vrain as a district. And I just love getting out into other people's rooms and
00:01:51.047 --> 00:01:52.387
getting new, fresh ideas.
00:01:53.167 --> 00:01:54.947
Oh, yeah. How fun.
00:01:55.887 --> 00:01:59.687
Well, today we're so lucky to welcome Connie Hamilton to the podcast.
00:01:59.947 --> 00:02:03.807
Connie is an author, speaker, and consultant who specializes in questioning,
00:02:03.987 --> 00:02:05.467
feedback, and instructional leadership.
00:02:05.747 --> 00:02:10.047
Best known for her book, Hacking Questions, Connie equips both new and veteran
00:02:10.047 --> 00:02:14.087
teachers with tools to sharpen their practice and raise the level of student thinking.
00:02:14.727 --> 00:02:18.367
Through her consulting work across the U.S. and Canada, she designs professional
00:02:18.367 --> 00:02:22.347
learning that is practical, research-informed, and teacher-friendly.
00:02:22.647 --> 00:02:25.267
Connie, thank you so much for joining us today on C3.
00:02:25.767 --> 00:02:29.887
Hi there. Thanks for having me. Can you tell us about your background in education
00:02:29.887 --> 00:02:31.287
and how you got your start?
00:02:32.339 --> 00:02:37.119
Well, it's a long story, but I'll keep it short. So I'll start and work backwards.
00:02:37.539 --> 00:02:42.959
So currently, I'm an author consultant. I spend most of my school days during
00:02:42.959 --> 00:02:47.559
the school year boots on the ground in schools when students are in session
00:02:47.559 --> 00:02:52.299
working with small groups of teachers in a coaching cohort.
00:02:52.419 --> 00:02:59.519
I call them SIFs. Prior to that, I was instructional assistant superintendent
00:02:59.519 --> 00:03:01.319
for instruction and curriculum.
00:03:01.659 --> 00:03:06.539
Prior to that, I was a principal at both the elementary and middle school levels.
00:03:06.539 --> 00:03:11.159
I was an assistant principal. I was a teacher at both those levels and an instructional
00:03:11.159 --> 00:03:14.379
coach through title, formerly chapter.
00:03:14.379 --> 00:03:18.439
So I've had a lot of experience in different settings.
00:03:18.439 --> 00:03:23.619
I taught in Texas. I'm originally from Michigan. And now I travel all over the
00:03:23.619 --> 00:03:28.839
country and Canada observing and talking with teachers everywhere and just taking
00:03:28.839 --> 00:03:33.599
in all of the goodness that is happening in our field of education.
00:03:34.479 --> 00:03:37.999
Yeah, I love that. Thank you for highlighting all the good things that are happening.
00:03:38.679 --> 00:03:42.259
And you've got such a rich background. I don't think there's a job in education
00:03:42.259 --> 00:03:44.819
you haven't touched on in some way.
00:03:44.839 --> 00:03:48.499
So you bring so much to the table when meeting with those teachers. Thank you.
00:03:49.359 --> 00:03:55.079
I think that broad perspective really comes in handy to look at that big picture.
00:03:55.919 --> 00:04:00.499
Yeah, especially within systems, working in a system and having that understanding
00:04:00.499 --> 00:04:05.379
of the different roles. I'm not sure that our classroom teachers are always able to grasp that.
00:04:05.559 --> 00:04:08.619
So having someone that can come in and kind of break down, you know,
00:04:08.699 --> 00:04:10.319
this is the thought behind this.
00:04:10.439 --> 00:04:15.779
It's not just coming from the top, but here's the different reasons and rationale behind that.
00:04:15.919 --> 00:04:19.439
It's really valuable to have that view and perspective on things. For sure.
00:04:20.600 --> 00:04:23.840
When we think about the power of a well-crafted coaching question,
00:04:23.840 --> 00:04:28.180
what do you see as the most important element that separates that and effective
00:04:28.180 --> 00:04:30.480
question from one that kind of just falls flat?
00:04:31.160 --> 00:04:37.220
Well, as you know, questioning is my jam. So I feel like coaching and the questioning
00:04:37.220 --> 00:04:42.940
process within coaching is really similar to student questioning in the sense
00:04:42.940 --> 00:04:45.100
that we're looking to create a cognitive journey.
00:04:45.100 --> 00:04:50.220
We're looking to have that aha and to really reveal the thinking process.
00:04:50.420 --> 00:04:53.880
So it's less about how do I get to the right answer?
00:04:54.100 --> 00:04:57.380
How do I get to that end point for this specific lesson?
00:04:57.880 --> 00:05:03.080
And more about how do I embrace instructional moves that work and are likely
00:05:03.080 --> 00:05:04.860
to work again in another lesson?
00:05:04.860 --> 00:05:11.380
And how do I create that metacognitive awareness so that I'm in tune to,
00:05:11.680 --> 00:05:15.660
whoops, this lesson is going sideways and it's time for me to pivot?
00:05:15.940 --> 00:05:24.060
Just being aware of that instead of just following a system or a structure in place.
00:05:24.200 --> 00:05:28.400
And so those well-crafted questions focus more on the journey,
00:05:28.720 --> 00:05:31.900
the thought process. What are you thinking about in the moment?
00:05:32.140 --> 00:05:37.180
What do you want to be noticing in the moment? and less about what is,
00:05:37.360 --> 00:05:39.380
what should be, what should have
00:05:39.380 --> 00:05:44.260
been, but more about how did we get there or how did we not get there?
00:05:44.400 --> 00:05:50.040
And then how are we going to tweak that again the next time that we go to teach a lesson?
00:05:50.980 --> 00:05:55.880
Yeah, you're really providing that space for the thinking to happen on the coachee's part.
00:05:56.000 --> 00:05:59.040
And that's something often, you know, at the busy pace of education,
00:05:59.220 --> 00:06:03.540
we kind of miss. So by asking those intentional questions gives them that space
00:06:03.540 --> 00:06:06.120
and time to be reflective. For sure.
00:06:06.845 --> 00:06:11.845
Many coaches struggle with balancing curiosity and leading a teacher toward
00:06:11.845 --> 00:06:16.205
reflection. How can coaches frame questions that avoid being directive while
00:06:16.205 --> 00:06:18.305
still supporting the instructional growth?
00:06:19.525 --> 00:06:24.785
So as I think about that, I think it's important for the listeners to know that
00:06:24.785 --> 00:06:28.785
my role is both of as a coach and a consultant.
00:06:29.165 --> 00:06:35.025
And so I flip flop with those different mindsets, but I'm really intentional with those mindsets.
00:06:35.025 --> 00:06:41.565
So I definitely see a value of staying in that coaching mindset to support the
00:06:41.565 --> 00:06:46.185
teacher through an awareness process, bringing things forward,
00:06:46.925 --> 00:06:52.465
thinking about their priorities, making tough decisions, and just helping them to think about that.
00:06:52.465 --> 00:06:58.525
There's also a time and a place where it's helpful to contribute and be a thought
00:06:58.525 --> 00:07:04.465
partner with that person to say, would you like some ideas or may I share some perspectives?
00:07:04.765 --> 00:07:10.025
I remember being on the opposite side of a coaching conversation and not really
00:07:10.025 --> 00:07:12.865
understanding what the coach's role was.
00:07:13.265 --> 00:07:17.245
And I don't remember, it felt like a million years into the conversation.
00:07:17.245 --> 00:07:23.605
She said, would you like me to step out of the coaching role and move into the
00:07:23.605 --> 00:07:26.405
consulting role and offer some suggestions? And I was like, well,
00:07:26.545 --> 00:07:29.085
yes, that's what I thought this was all about.
00:07:29.705 --> 00:07:35.485
And so I've always kept that in mind that there are many times that teachers...
00:07:36.453 --> 00:07:42.473
Need more than simply reflection. Sometimes like our toolbox is just exhausted
00:07:42.473 --> 00:07:47.813
and we're interested in some fresh ideas and that is what is helpful.
00:07:48.093 --> 00:07:55.513
So I find that it's easiest to balance that process of staying in the coaching
00:07:55.513 --> 00:08:00.093
mode initially to establish rapport and to connect with the teacher when the
00:08:00.093 --> 00:08:04.393
initial conversation is before the lesson occurs.
00:08:04.593 --> 00:08:09.113
So it's when there is a lesson plan or a lesson is beginning to develop.
00:08:09.233 --> 00:08:13.653
It just feels more like a draft at that point.
00:08:13.873 --> 00:08:19.953
And so teachers are often more open in that moment to exploring opportunities
00:08:19.953 --> 00:08:24.493
and thinking about their choices and rethinking some of their decisions and
00:08:24.493 --> 00:08:29.433
being mindful about options that they have and talking about those options because
00:08:29.433 --> 00:08:30.413
they haven't done it yet.
00:08:30.733 --> 00:08:35.393
And everyone's interested in picking the thing that's most likely to be.
00:08:35.832 --> 00:08:43.632
Support student learning. So that, how you set it up initially is communicating, what is my role?
00:08:44.152 --> 00:08:48.652
I'm going, for me, I'm going to be serving as a coach to help you kind of think through things.
00:08:48.812 --> 00:08:54.732
And then also, everyone will get the benefit of some glows and grows of when
00:08:54.732 --> 00:08:57.752
the lesson is over, we'll look at what worked, what worked well,
00:08:57.952 --> 00:09:02.172
what data supports that, and then what are some opportunities that we can throw
00:09:02.172 --> 00:09:05.752
to fill up your toolbox that you can tinker with and try out.
00:09:05.832 --> 00:09:11.272
So that's the consulting piece of it is that I'm not just here to listen and
00:09:11.272 --> 00:09:17.132
ask a bunch of questions, but also to be that thought partner so that there's
00:09:17.132 --> 00:09:18.392
some credibility established.
00:09:19.372 --> 00:09:26.112
So balancing that when we're trying not to be directive is to be really mindful
00:09:26.112 --> 00:09:28.572
about where your headspace is.
00:09:28.732 --> 00:09:32.332
So if you begin to ask questions that you're thinking, that's not what I was
00:09:32.332 --> 00:09:36.392
hoping that they would say, that's an indication that you're slipping into the
00:09:36.392 --> 00:09:40.632
consulting mode and perhaps without intention.
00:09:41.452 --> 00:09:46.772
So thinking about just your own thought process, are you still curious about
00:09:46.772 --> 00:09:53.092
what it is that they are, how they're making their decisions and helping them to reveal it versus.
00:09:53.532 --> 00:09:54.892
Hmm, I'm curious if I can, like,
00:09:55.132 --> 00:09:59.712
well, do you think that you should put a formative assessment in here?
00:09:59.852 --> 00:10:05.012
Like, right, that's an obvious, not a coaching question. It's a suggestive,
00:10:05.152 --> 00:10:10.192
a suggestion raised as a question. So we want to be really intentional,
00:10:10.192 --> 00:10:14.012
and we want those questions to spark reflections.
00:10:14.372 --> 00:10:18.492
And some of those questions that do that the best are things like,
00:10:18.632 --> 00:10:22.232
how will you know when it's time to pivot?
00:10:22.592 --> 00:10:27.552
Or what will tell you that this is working? Or what?
00:10:27.992 --> 00:10:32.432
How long do you think that it will take for students to, quote unquote, get it?
00:10:32.532 --> 00:10:38.132
Or what might happen when you facilitate this specific instructional move?
00:10:38.332 --> 00:10:45.112
So revealing some of those what ifs helps to highlight the fact that it's not
00:10:45.112 --> 00:10:49.132
a it's not written in stone path of how you get to that end point.
00:10:49.312 --> 00:10:52.672
But it's that's the art. That's the pedagogy of our profession.
00:10:52.672 --> 00:10:58.452
And it highlights that we have lots of decisions and those decisions can differ.
00:10:58.732 --> 00:11:04.312
So really trying to make sure that we're mindful of providing that awareness,
00:11:04.612 --> 00:11:10.092
tapping into the expertise that teachers have, but also knowing when it's time
00:11:10.092 --> 00:11:19.052
to offer your own expertise if the teacher is showing signs of wishing for it or wanting it.
00:11:19.557 --> 00:11:23.077
And I love how you so beautifully said, may I offer.
00:11:23.577 --> 00:11:27.917
It's still honoring that coachee and not just jumping in and seeming like we
00:11:27.917 --> 00:11:30.457
have all the answers as the coach, because we certainly don't.
00:11:30.577 --> 00:11:33.697
But you're still honoring them and saying, hey, let's partner together.
00:11:33.857 --> 00:11:35.397
Can I offer you some suggestions?
00:11:36.377 --> 00:11:41.497
And I like how you say that plural, right? So offering multiple suggestions,
00:11:41.497 --> 00:11:45.077
then it puts that decision back into their hands.
00:11:45.257 --> 00:11:50.637
So if you want to do some kind of a cognitive check for understanding,
00:11:50.937 --> 00:11:55.477
well, some teachers use whiteboards, some teachers use a turn and talk,
00:11:55.677 --> 00:12:00.197
some teachers use a stop and jot, some teachers use a kahoot.
00:12:00.737 --> 00:12:03.397
You know, are there some of those that you've had success with in the past or
00:12:03.397 --> 00:12:05.797
there's something that you are interested in trying?
00:12:06.057 --> 00:12:10.117
So it just puts them back like, hey, there are still lots of choices and the
00:12:10.117 --> 00:12:12.417
decision ultimately remains in your hands.
00:12:13.277 --> 00:12:17.537
Yeah, and you're building on prior success. We know these things have worked for you before.
00:12:17.877 --> 00:12:21.297
So what one do you want to bring forward? And it's just really building that
00:12:21.297 --> 00:12:24.497
time to think through. And that's why the planning conversation is so important.
00:12:24.697 --> 00:12:28.677
I agree. In your experience, what types of questions tend to open the door for
00:12:28.677 --> 00:12:31.457
deeper teacher reflection versus those that shut it down?
00:12:32.313 --> 00:12:37.673
So as I mentioned, when I go into schools, I work oftentimes with six teachers
00:12:37.673 --> 00:12:40.513
and I see them, typically I see them three days a year.
00:12:40.833 --> 00:12:44.733
And the first time that I see them, like, hello, my name is Connie. Nice to meet you.
00:12:45.133 --> 00:12:51.813
So in my role, I don't have the benefit of knowing people in advance and kind
00:12:51.813 --> 00:12:55.153
of knowing their strengths already or visiting their classroom multiple times.
00:12:55.153 --> 00:12:59.893
So this is particularly an area that I'm really mindful of because I have to
00:12:59.893 --> 00:13:01.513
establish rapport quickly.
00:13:01.893 --> 00:13:06.373
So there are a few ways that I establish rapport,
00:13:06.673 --> 00:13:12.293
create a sense of safety, and then that sense of safety allows teachers to be
00:13:12.293 --> 00:13:18.113
vulnerable, which leads to deeper reflection and doesn't cause them to be defensive or shut down.
00:13:18.113 --> 00:13:23.553
So the first is kind of a consistency in the way that I frame questions.
00:13:24.273 --> 00:13:28.513
So every time I sit down with a teacher, I start off with, what do you want
00:13:28.513 --> 00:13:30.873
students to learn today? Or what is your learning target?
00:13:31.053 --> 00:13:36.053
So we always start with that particular piece and how will you know that they've met that target?
00:13:36.273 --> 00:13:40.053
And then we just kind of work our way through that. So because there's a bit
00:13:40.053 --> 00:13:45.293
of familiarity in the structure of the conversation, there is less surprise
00:13:45.293 --> 00:13:47.173
about some of the initial questions.
00:13:47.173 --> 00:13:53.073
So when the follow-up questions are more specific, there's still some level of comfort.
00:13:53.333 --> 00:13:59.333
So trying to be consistent and a bit predictive in the way that you pose questions,
00:13:59.333 --> 00:14:01.833
when you are predictive in that way,
00:14:02.093 --> 00:14:07.613
then those questions can then transfer to the teacher so they can begin asking
00:14:07.613 --> 00:14:10.353
themselves those questions when you're not there.
00:14:10.773 --> 00:14:15.493
So there's multiple reasons for providing some consistency in the way that the
00:14:15.493 --> 00:14:18.313
questions are formatted. I hadn't thought of it like that.
00:14:18.612 --> 00:14:23.152
With getting teachers to ask themselves those questions, if you are consistent
00:14:23.152 --> 00:14:27.212
in your line of questioning, that's a beautiful gradual release process there. For sure.
00:14:27.412 --> 00:14:30.992
And a lot of times the teachers will say, this is when I know that I'm having
00:14:30.992 --> 00:14:34.332
an impact, is when teachers will say, I could hear you in my head.
00:14:34.472 --> 00:14:37.112
I knew what question you were going to ask me.
00:14:37.332 --> 00:14:41.092
And last night when I was getting ready to see you today, I asked myself all
00:14:41.092 --> 00:14:43.592
those same questions and I'm thinking, jackpot.
00:14:44.632 --> 00:14:51.412
Now we're really building the efficacy. see. So the next is building that deeper
00:14:51.412 --> 00:14:56.072
reflection. And again, that sense of safety is normalizing imperfection.
00:14:57.012 --> 00:15:01.172
So assuming that everything is not going to go perfect.
00:15:01.372 --> 00:15:05.192
So posing questions like, what do you think is going to be the most challenging part of this lesson?
00:15:05.372 --> 00:15:10.492
The most challenging part might be, what's going to be the highest cognitive demand for learners?
00:15:10.712 --> 00:15:14.532
Where are they going to have the challenge? Or it might be an instructional
00:15:14.532 --> 00:15:18.512
move like, okay, I have a lot of parts going at this particular time,
00:15:18.552 --> 00:15:21.772
and I want to make sure that engagement doesn't dip while I'm getting out these
00:15:21.772 --> 00:15:24.952
materials and have these students that are going to take longer.
00:15:25.092 --> 00:15:27.512
And it just may be a facilitation component.
00:15:27.692 --> 00:15:33.572
And so bringing out a conversation about, okay, what's going to be the hardest part?
00:15:34.052 --> 00:15:39.712
Now, when teachers identify that in advance, if the lesson turns out to be challenging
00:15:39.712 --> 00:15:44.452
in that moment, they've pre-identified that as a challenging point.
00:15:44.452 --> 00:15:50.712
And so they don't have to be so defensive or explanatory about why it went wrong
00:15:50.712 --> 00:15:52.832
and what they were thinking because we already talked about it.
00:15:52.932 --> 00:15:55.412
And everyone is expecting that in the beginning.
00:15:55.732 --> 00:15:59.232
And in my sense, in the small group, typically when a teacher is like,
00:15:59.352 --> 00:16:01.952
this part is going to be hard, everybody else in the room is like,
00:16:02.112 --> 00:16:04.292
oh, yeah, that is going to be hard.
00:16:04.732 --> 00:16:06.892
And so there's that.
00:16:07.548 --> 00:16:12.428
Camaraderie. There's that collective efficacy that all comes in together that
00:16:12.428 --> 00:16:16.848
we all have been there and it's fine if things go awry.
00:16:17.208 --> 00:16:22.428
And then that other component is establishing yourself as that thought partner.
00:16:22.688 --> 00:16:29.068
And so when you contribute something that they take away, then it makes them
00:16:29.068 --> 00:16:32.128
want to meet with you again and again and again.
00:16:32.268 --> 00:16:36.028
I really enjoy my time with Connie or Courtney or with whomever,
00:16:36.028 --> 00:16:39.888
because I always walk away with something.
00:16:40.488 --> 00:16:45.688
And if they aren't bringing it out in their own, if that coaching conversation
00:16:45.688 --> 00:16:50.828
is just feeling like I got nothing, then that's the time to sort of shift and
00:16:50.828 --> 00:16:54.948
say, would it be helpful if I shared some of the things that I've observed in other classes?
00:16:55.168 --> 00:16:59.448
And then we can just launch from there. Stop me as soon as something really
00:16:59.448 --> 00:17:02.628
sounds exciting to you. And then we'll explore that piece.
00:17:02.788 --> 00:17:06.688
And then I just sort of list it as a checkbox, not as a suggestion,
00:17:06.688 --> 00:17:09.748
but do you like this? Do you like this? Do you like this? Do you like this?
00:17:09.948 --> 00:17:13.108
More like a menu. And then we can dive in.
00:17:13.928 --> 00:17:18.128
When you bring those things in, consistency in the way you frame questions,
00:17:18.488 --> 00:17:21.908
normalizing that imperfection and serving as a thought partner,
00:17:22.128 --> 00:17:27.768
it creates an atmosphere of we are all here to support one another. And it's not a gotcha.
00:17:27.948 --> 00:17:31.588
Whenever it feels like a gotcha or a judgment, that's when people get defensive
00:17:31.588 --> 00:17:34.448
and they tend to just say, I've had enough of this and they shut down.
00:17:35.131 --> 00:17:39.231
Yeah, it's really about that collective efficacy and how we can tap everyone
00:17:39.231 --> 00:17:44.451
and all the resources to bring together that ideal lesson or to improve our lesson.
00:17:45.171 --> 00:17:49.731
For sure. So you touched on it earlier, but especially working with new teachers,
00:17:49.731 --> 00:17:54.291
how can we adapt our questioning or maybe thinking about their emotional state
00:17:54.291 --> 00:17:55.931
when we're going into a coaching session?
00:17:55.991 --> 00:17:59.531
What are some of your tips and tricks with that? You know,
00:17:59.851 --> 00:18:08.971
I first tried to really read the person less on the experience because in my
00:18:08.971 --> 00:18:13.131
own experience, I've had brand new teachers who are overconfident.
00:18:13.391 --> 00:18:17.511
They think they know it all already and, you know, I'm ready to do this and
00:18:17.511 --> 00:18:20.431
I've had great teachers before and I got this teaching thing down.
00:18:20.611 --> 00:18:25.271
And then I've had veteran teachers who are dynamic, but they still question
00:18:25.271 --> 00:18:30.211
their effectiveness. So I really look to see, like, where is their level of confidence?
00:18:30.811 --> 00:18:35.711
Do they present themselves more as what we would typically think as a new teacher?
00:18:35.831 --> 00:18:39.491
Or do they present themselves more as somebody who's really kind of perfecting
00:18:39.491 --> 00:18:41.371
this? And then I go from that perspective.
00:18:42.211 --> 00:18:47.591
So teachers that are a bit more guarded, I tend to, well, I always focus on
00:18:47.591 --> 00:18:52.231
strengths, but I really lead hard on the strengths. You're doing this really
00:18:52.231 --> 00:18:54.591
well. This is definitely a strength of yours.
00:18:54.791 --> 00:19:00.891
And so in this moment, how do you decide when it's time to.
00:19:01.607 --> 00:19:07.587
And the independent work? How do you decide when you're going to throw in a think-pair-share?
00:19:07.667 --> 00:19:11.527
What is it that you notice that says, okay, this is the time?
00:19:11.887 --> 00:19:17.147
Or what are you thinking about as you're framing those on-the-fly questions?
00:19:17.147 --> 00:19:18.527
What's going through your mind?
00:19:18.707 --> 00:19:23.967
So it's still this curiosity component. It's building on their strengths,
00:19:23.967 --> 00:19:29.467
and yet it's still revealing their thought process, And it allows them to shine
00:19:29.467 --> 00:19:33.007
and really share where they perceive their expertise.
00:19:33.427 --> 00:19:36.787
And then I watch for some of their nonverbals.
00:19:36.947 --> 00:19:42.027
Are they jotting down some notes when other people are sharing ideas or,
00:19:42.027 --> 00:19:48.967
I don't know, offering small little tweaks? Or when we are sharing raw data,
00:19:49.387 --> 00:19:51.727
do they really lean in on the data?
00:19:51.967 --> 00:19:58.447
Or are they saying, well, this doesn't happen all the time, or that was an anomaly?
00:19:58.787 --> 00:20:01.947
Or, you know, how are they responding to those data points?
00:20:02.207 --> 00:20:07.627
And then I try to lean into that wherever they are leaning.
00:20:07.787 --> 00:20:11.187
I try to flip it a bit. So if they're leaning into being defensive,
00:20:11.487 --> 00:20:14.627
then I come in on this is what is working well, heavy, heavy.
00:20:14.627 --> 00:20:20.307
If they are focusing on what's working well and everything is dynamo,
00:20:20.447 --> 00:20:25.307
then I come into where do you think that students had this,
00:20:25.567 --> 00:20:28.767
where would you make a tweak or where do you think students struggle the most
00:20:28.767 --> 00:20:31.767
and how can we provide in that perspective?
00:20:32.067 --> 00:20:34.687
For teachers who are already more reflective of.
00:20:35.429 --> 00:20:39.629
And maybe kind of think of them as sponges and just gimme, gimme, gimme.
00:20:40.489 --> 00:20:45.989
In my experience, those teachers often tend to be a bit harder on themselves than they ought to be.
00:20:46.229 --> 00:20:51.489
They often verge on the edge of perfectionism.
00:20:51.729 --> 00:20:57.809
And so for them, it's important to me to make sure that they have a mental plan
00:20:57.809 --> 00:21:04.469
B and plan C so that we're normalizing that plan A doesn't always have to work.
00:21:04.469 --> 00:21:11.769
And empowering them in the moment to be noticing when is it time to shift to
00:21:11.769 --> 00:21:18.789
plan B or C and what am I seeing that tells me that C is better than B but I know A isn't working.
00:21:19.109 --> 00:21:24.189
And so that feels super empowering when you're like, I got a plan for that, I'm ready.
00:21:24.589 --> 00:21:30.429
And so I try to just kind of lean into where is that level of confidence.
00:21:31.029 --> 00:21:34.069
And then the last piece that you kind of talked about, emotions,
00:21:34.709 --> 00:21:39.649
sometimes people cry, you know, even especially after the lesson.
00:21:40.529 --> 00:21:44.129
Sometimes it's because the lesson just really actually did flop.
00:21:44.269 --> 00:21:50.529
And everybody, anybody who saw it would be like, yep, that happens to all of us and no biggie.
00:21:50.649 --> 00:21:54.149
But of course, to the host teacher, it is a big deal.
00:21:54.309 --> 00:21:59.509
We take our profession so personally that it means a lot to us.
00:21:59.609 --> 00:22:02.689
And so when I see tears, I learned this through therapy.
00:22:03.579 --> 00:22:07.459
Cognitive behavior therapy. When you see tears, you acknowledge it,
00:22:07.519 --> 00:22:10.059
but we don't dwell on it. We're not trying to fix the tears.
00:22:10.539 --> 00:22:17.999
And so what I have observed from evaluators, other coaches, fear observers,
00:22:17.999 --> 00:22:22.979
when we see tears, we want to fix it. We want the teacher to feel good in that moment.
00:22:23.539 --> 00:22:27.599
And my take is, let's just lean into it. Like, it's okay to be emotional.
00:22:27.599 --> 00:22:34.679
What that tells me is that you care, but I'm not going to provide excuses like, oh, that happened.
00:22:34.799 --> 00:22:37.699
It's Friday afternoon. And of course they were this.
00:22:37.799 --> 00:22:42.659
And it was after lunch. And we had a fire drill this morning.
00:22:42.679 --> 00:22:44.919
I'm not going to offer excuses because you know what?
00:22:44.959 --> 00:22:48.539
We have Friday afternoon every week. We have lunch every day.
00:22:48.659 --> 00:22:53.579
We have fire drills multiple times a year. And so when those things happen,
00:22:53.739 --> 00:22:59.439
because they will, we want teachers to be armed with, okay, let's be mindful.
00:22:59.799 --> 00:23:04.659
This is a moment when I'm going to need to shift because all of my go-to default
00:23:04.659 --> 00:23:07.179
strategies are not working right now.
00:23:07.259 --> 00:23:12.179
And so now we have to embrace the failure to.
00:23:12.887 --> 00:23:18.207
Dig into an analysis of why didn't it work when it usually does?
00:23:18.407 --> 00:23:20.127
And then what can we do differently?
00:23:20.407 --> 00:23:25.527
I find it a bit comical sometimes that you walk into a classroom and they have
00:23:25.527 --> 00:23:29.747
the bulletin board, F-A-I-L, right? First attempt in learning.
00:23:29.987 --> 00:23:34.147
And yet we don't practice what we teach. and so
00:23:34.147 --> 00:23:41.667
re-normalizing that teaching is not perfection and that we measure success of
00:23:41.667 --> 00:23:46.567
teaching of did students learn what they were supposed to learn or do we have
00:23:46.567 --> 00:23:51.367
more information about where students are in the learning journey so we can
00:23:51.367 --> 00:23:53.527
meet them where they are tomorrow.
00:23:54.047 --> 00:23:57.447
Yeah, thank you for so beautifully highlighting all the cognition that's happening
00:23:57.447 --> 00:24:01.807
on the coach's part and then how you get your coachee to think through all the
00:24:01.807 --> 00:24:04.187
A, B, and C. If this doesn't work, how do we shift?
00:24:04.427 --> 00:24:07.467
And that really just highlights all the decisions teachers are making.
00:24:07.487 --> 00:24:11.767
And then when coaches are coaching, all of the things that they're processing
00:24:11.767 --> 00:24:15.747
and taking in when they go to ask those intentional questions. Uh-huh.
00:24:16.650 --> 00:24:19.910
So if coaches were just beginning to refine their questioning practice,
00:24:20.110 --> 00:24:22.850
I know a lot of them after listening to this are going to dive in.
00:24:23.050 --> 00:24:26.750
What's one habit or strategy you'd recommend they start with tomorrow to become
00:24:26.750 --> 00:24:29.290
more intentional and how they frame their questions?
00:24:30.150 --> 00:24:35.070
I think the power in coaching and the ahas really come in the follow-up questions.
00:24:35.630 --> 00:24:42.250
And so staying with a specific topic, it's more of an inch wide and a mile deep.
00:24:42.250 --> 00:24:48.130
Sometimes when it comes to having an impact, we can touch on all the facets of a lesson.
00:24:48.650 --> 00:24:52.110
And then we feel like, yeah, we touched everything, but what did we actually accomplish?
00:24:52.350 --> 00:24:58.410
What are we walking away with? And so if we can just hone in on a specific aspect
00:24:58.410 --> 00:25:01.950
that the teacher is interested in growing their practice,
00:25:02.410 --> 00:25:06.930
then if that's differentiation or it's engagement or it's formative assessment,
00:25:06.930 --> 00:25:13.970
then we can feel okay to kind of ease off of two out of three of those things
00:25:13.970 --> 00:25:20.310
and just hone in on that one and allow the teacher to also focus in on that one.
00:25:20.450 --> 00:25:24.410
So the next time you come in for a session, we're still focused on that one
00:25:24.410 --> 00:25:30.670
area of instruction that we collaboratively agreed is going to be our focus.
00:25:30.910 --> 00:25:33.410
So if a teacher says, hey, I want to work on my questioning,
00:25:33.410 --> 00:25:37.210
I'm not going to come in and say, so what do you think about your formative assessment process?
00:25:37.230 --> 00:25:40.910
Or what do you think about engagement? Or how is your time management?
00:25:41.770 --> 00:25:48.110
That's a gotcha. And so we have to be clear about what it is that we're focusing on.
00:25:48.210 --> 00:25:50.270
And then those follow up questions.
00:25:50.530 --> 00:25:56.150
And a lot of times, it's really the metacognitive questions. How will you know?
00:25:56.450 --> 00:25:59.010
What will you see? What will.
00:26:01.581 --> 00:26:06.001
If you have this choice and this choice and this choice, and you don't know
00:26:06.001 --> 00:26:10.741
which one that you're going to make in the moment, what will cause you to pick A?
00:26:10.881 --> 00:26:13.861
What will cause you to pick B? What will cause you to pick C?
00:26:14.221 --> 00:26:20.121
Those conversations flow into so many more lessons than the single lesson that
00:26:20.121 --> 00:26:23.181
they're about to teach with the plan that you're creating now,
00:26:23.281 --> 00:26:28.681
because now they have articulated, when do I do A? When do I do B? When do I do C?
00:26:28.821 --> 00:26:31.861
And those things are likely to occur over and over and over and over.
00:26:31.981 --> 00:26:37.201
So we're developing that transfer of the metacognitive process of thinking about that.
00:26:37.381 --> 00:26:42.061
So diving deep on those follow-up questions about just being thoughtful,
00:26:42.061 --> 00:26:45.741
what kind of data would be helpful for you?
00:26:45.741 --> 00:26:53.081
That's another way that coaches can establish a value in the process of it's
00:26:53.081 --> 00:26:58.321
impossible for teachers to chart their questions, tally their questions,
00:26:58.641 --> 00:27:03.201
and categorize their questions unless they videotape themselves.
00:27:03.201 --> 00:27:07.581
So as an observer, as a coach or a consultant, I can serve that role.
00:27:07.761 --> 00:27:10.701
Would you like me to come in? And since we're working on questionings,
00:27:10.761 --> 00:27:12.741
I could just gather some data and just share it with you.
00:27:13.261 --> 00:27:17.521
And then here it is. It's just raw data. Now my questions become,
00:27:17.661 --> 00:27:20.581
what do you notice? What stands out to you? What do you like?
00:27:21.301 --> 00:27:29.701
What surprises you? So those then shift into really cool and valuable conversations.
00:27:31.198 --> 00:27:35.218
Are not part of my agenda. They're just part of the process.
00:27:36.238 --> 00:27:40.898
Well, that's great coaching, right? Yes, exactly. Well, I could talk to you
00:27:40.898 --> 00:27:44.338
all day about coaching and about crafting great questions.
00:27:44.358 --> 00:27:47.178
How can our listeners learn more from you and with you?
00:27:47.738 --> 00:27:52.418
My website is ConnieHamilton.org. Don't go to ConnieHamilton.com.
00:27:52.518 --> 00:27:54.738
That's a real estate agent in the Midwest somewhere.
00:27:55.018 --> 00:27:59.838
So ConnieHamilton.org. And I think what your coaches might find most valuable
00:27:59.838 --> 00:28:02.338
there is I have a page that's full of free resources.
00:28:02.598 --> 00:28:07.058
Everything is free. And one of them is called SIFT Data Descriptions.
00:28:07.278 --> 00:28:12.498
And it's pages and pages of different data points that observers can collect
00:28:12.498 --> 00:28:15.958
and a description of how you might collect that data.
00:28:16.178 --> 00:28:19.698
It's a great tool that you can download and bring to a coaching conversation
00:28:19.698 --> 00:28:26.378
to say, would any of these be helpful for you if I were to gather this evidence and data for you?
00:28:26.498 --> 00:28:30.978
So it's a good way to bring in data and then put that ownership in the hands
00:28:30.978 --> 00:28:33.438
of the teacher that you're having your conversation with.
00:28:34.038 --> 00:28:36.738
So ConnieHamilton.org is the easiest way to get in touch with me.
00:28:37.298 --> 00:28:41.138
We're going to see those clicks go up. I know a lot of coaches listening are
00:28:41.138 --> 00:28:44.738
going to be downloading that document and diving into collecting some data.
00:28:45.358 --> 00:28:48.738
We're going to move into the rapid fire portion of our interview.
00:28:49.758 --> 00:28:54.338
Roughly 10 seconds or less. What's one strategy every coach should have in their back pocket?
00:28:55.098 --> 00:28:59.478
Well, I mentioned in the pre-brief, what's part of the lesson is most challenging,
00:28:59.858 --> 00:29:02.158
either for student learning or for facilitation.
00:29:02.378 --> 00:29:06.638
And then in the debrief, it's if you could run this lesson again tomorrow,
00:29:06.638 --> 00:29:10.498
what's one thing that you would keep and one thing that you would adjust.
00:29:10.978 --> 00:29:17.038
It normalizes that teaching is iterative and that it shifts from the focus from judgment to growth.
00:29:17.731 --> 00:29:21.891
What a powerful question. If you had 60 seconds with a new teacher,
00:29:22.091 --> 00:29:23.251
what's one thing you'd tell them?
00:29:23.771 --> 00:29:27.991
I'm really big on strength-based coaching, so I would try to make it as personal
00:29:27.991 --> 00:29:31.631
as possible. This is your gift. This is your talent. This is your jam.
00:29:31.851 --> 00:29:35.731
But in the absence of knowing that ahead of time, if I had a room full of first-year
00:29:35.731 --> 00:29:37.991
teachers, I'd say, keep your eye on learning.
00:29:38.351 --> 00:29:42.251
Focus your measurement of success on a lesson with whether or not students learned,
00:29:42.471 --> 00:29:46.771
not whether or not they were busy, or if your lesson went the way that it says
00:29:46.771 --> 00:29:51.391
in the textbook, or in the podcast or on the website that you saw,
00:29:51.531 --> 00:29:53.991
but just focus on did students learn?
00:29:54.251 --> 00:29:57.551
If they did, your lesson is a success. Hopefully we have some new teachers or
00:29:57.551 --> 00:29:59.651
some coaches passing on that information.
00:30:00.051 --> 00:30:04.431
Well, I appreciate so much you joining me today and I can't wait to dive into
00:30:04.431 --> 00:30:07.631
more of your work. Thank you so much. I really enjoyed being here today.
00:30:08.371 --> 00:30:11.591
Connie shared so many insights and great tips on elevating your questions.
00:30:11.931 --> 00:30:15.631
How might you adjust some of the questions you ask your coaches and how might
00:30:15.631 --> 00:30:19.591
you build space and capacity to get them doing the heavy lifting and thinking.
00:30:19.831 --> 00:30:22.011
Thanks for listening to another episode of C3.
00:30:22.351 --> 00:30:24.131
Be sure to follow us on social media.