このエピソードについて
Link to bioRxiv paper:
http://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2022.12.28.22283666v1?rss=1
Authors: Song, R., Zeng, G., Yu, J., Meng, X., Chen, X., Li, J., Xie, X., Lian, X., Zhang, Z., Cao, Y., Yin, W., Jin, R.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND This study has assessed a new Anti-COVID-19 Monoclonal Antibody Nasal Spray (SA58) for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) against symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS We conducted an efficacy study in adults aged 18 years and older within three days of exposure to a SARS-CoV-2 infected individual. Recruited participants were randomized in a ratio of 3:1 to receive SA58 or placebo. Primary endpoints were laboratory-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 within study period. FINDINGS A total of 1,222 participants were randomized and dosed (SA58, n=901; placebo, n=321). Median of follow-up was 2.25 days and 2.79 days for SA58 and placebo, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 221 of 901 (25%) and 72 of 321 (22%) participants with SA58 and placebo, respectively, with no significant difference (P=0.49). All adverse events were mild in severity. Laboratory-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 developed in 7 of 824 participants (0.22 per 100 person-days) in the SA58 group vs 14 of 299 (1.17 per 100 person-days) in the placebo group, resulting in an estimated efficacy of 80.82% (95%CI 52.41%-92.27%). There were 32 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positives (1.04 per 100 person-days) in the SA58 group vs 32 (2.80 per 100 person-days) in the placebo group, resulting in an estimated efficacy of 61.83% (95%CI 37.50%-76.69%). A total of 21 RT-PCR positive samples were sequenced. 21 lineages of SARS-CoV-2 variants were identified, and all were the Omicron variant BF.7. INTERPRETATION SA58 Nasal Spray showed favorable efficacy and safety in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection or symptomatic COVID-19 in healthy adult workers who had exposure to SARS-CoV-2 within 72 hours.
Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info
Podcast created by Paper Player, LLC
http://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2022.12.28.22283666v1?rss=1
Authors: Song, R., Zeng, G., Yu, J., Meng, X., Chen, X., Li, J., Xie, X., Lian, X., Zhang, Z., Cao, Y., Yin, W., Jin, R.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND This study has assessed a new Anti-COVID-19 Monoclonal Antibody Nasal Spray (SA58) for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) against symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS We conducted an efficacy study in adults aged 18 years and older within three days of exposure to a SARS-CoV-2 infected individual. Recruited participants were randomized in a ratio of 3:1 to receive SA58 or placebo. Primary endpoints were laboratory-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 within study period. FINDINGS A total of 1,222 participants were randomized and dosed (SA58, n=901; placebo, n=321). Median of follow-up was 2.25 days and 2.79 days for SA58 and placebo, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 221 of 901 (25%) and 72 of 321 (22%) participants with SA58 and placebo, respectively, with no significant difference (P=0.49). All adverse events were mild in severity. Laboratory-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 developed in 7 of 824 participants (0.22 per 100 person-days) in the SA58 group vs 14 of 299 (1.17 per 100 person-days) in the placebo group, resulting in an estimated efficacy of 80.82% (95%CI 52.41%-92.27%). There were 32 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positives (1.04 per 100 person-days) in the SA58 group vs 32 (2.80 per 100 person-days) in the placebo group, resulting in an estimated efficacy of 61.83% (95%CI 37.50%-76.69%). A total of 21 RT-PCR positive samples were sequenced. 21 lineages of SARS-CoV-2 variants were identified, and all were the Omicron variant BF.7. INTERPRETATION SA58 Nasal Spray showed favorable efficacy and safety in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection or symptomatic COVID-19 in healthy adult workers who had exposure to SARS-CoV-2 within 72 hours.
Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info
Podcast created by Paper Player, LLC
英語
アメリカ合衆国
このポッドキャストの他のエピソード
Link to bioRxiv paper:
http://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2023.07.31.23293337v1?rss=1
Authors: Hurst, J. H., Mohan, A., Dalapati, T., George, I. A., Aquino, J. N., Lugo, D. J., Pfeiffer, T. S., Rodriguez, J., Rotta, A. T., Turner, N. A., Burke, T. W., McClain, M. T., Henao, R., DeMarco, C. T., …
Link to bioRxiv paper:
http://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2023.08.01.23293515v1?rss=1
Authors: Chitnis, C. E., Martinez, F. J., White, M., Guillotte-Blisnick, M., Huon, C., Boucharlat, A., Agou, F., England, P., Popovici, J., Hou, M. M., Silk, S. E., Barrett, J. R., Nielsen, C. M., Reimer, J. M…
Link to bioRxiv paper:
http://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2023.07.28.23293301v1?rss=1
Authors: Ndzomo, P., Tchatchouang, S., Njih Tabah, E., Njamnshi, T., Noah, M. V. T., Bondi, J. A., Handley, R., Gonzalez Beiras, C., Tchatchueng, J., Muller, C., Luert, S., Knauf, S., Boyomo, O., Harding-Esch,…
Link to bioRxiv paper:
http://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2023.08.02.23293478v1?rss=1
Authors: Macesic, N., Dennis, A., Hawkey, J., Vezina, B., Wisniewski, J. A., Cottingham, H., Blakeway, L. V., Harshegyi, T., Pragastis, K., Badoordeen, G. Z., Bass, P., Stewardson, A. J., Dennison, A., Spelman…
Link to bioRxiv paper:
http://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2023.07.31.23293441v1?rss=1
Authors: Li, Y., Choudhary, M. C., Regan, J., Boucau, J., Nathan, A., Speidel, T., Liew, M. Y., Edelstein, G. E., Kawano, Y., Uddin, R., Deo, R., Marino, C., Getz, M. A., Reynold, Z., Barry, M., Gilbert, R. F.…
免責: このページに埋め込まれているポッドキャストとアートワークは PaperPlayer からのものであり、その所有者の所有物であり、Listen Notes, Inc. と提携または承認されていません。