WEBVTT
00:00:04.370 --> 00:00:11.099
This is a tool to use to bring communities together and itself is a strategic play in a system.
00:00:15.900 --> 00:00:21.420
Welcome to In Too Deep, the place for meaningful conversations about tackling tough problems.
00:00:23.260 --> 00:00:26.890
We're joined today by Sam Rye, who's hosting the conversation.
00:00:27.120 --> 00:00:44.500
Sam is a self-described unapologetic generalist, has spent time in many places around the globe and is a longtime member of the Kumu community as well as Karen Grattan who is the founder of Engaging Inquiry.
00:00:44.500 --> 00:00:51.369
I think you will be blown away by the depth and breadth of her experience and their firm's mission to bring light to complexity.
00:00:52.000 --> 00:00:52.000
Enjoy.
00:00:52.890 --> 00:00:54.469
My name is Sam Rye.
00:00:54.590 --> 00:00:58.060
Today I'm here with Karen Grattan from Engaging Inquiry.
00:00:58.630 --> 00:01:03.250
I'd love to hear a little bit about your organization and what you do.
00:01:04.599 --> 00:01:04.599
Okay.
00:01:04.600 --> 00:01:06.129
Sam, thanks for having me.
00:01:06.340 --> 00:01:08.500
Well, so let me tell you a little bit about Engaging Inquiry.
00:01:08.530 --> 00:01:28.799
We are a small consulting practice that has basically gotten our wings are through using systems practice to support teams in developing more comprehensive and robust strategies.
00:01:30.489 --> 00:01:39.849
The practice, we primarily use is one that I had the good fortune to codevelop with the systems and complexity team at The Omidyar Group.
00:01:40.299 --> 00:01:57.599
So what we do is we come alongside teams, we call it accompaniment in that what we're trying to do is come and build capacity and grow a team's ability to use some of the tools of systems thinking.
00:01:57.780 --> 00:02:17.319
Specifically we use a lot of dynamic system mapping and actor mapping, um, but more to develop a set of practices that sort of reshape and change the way they think about designing, executing and adapting strategy over time to have impact in the world.
00:02:19.159 --> 00:02:19.810
Awesome.
00:02:19.900 --> 00:02:26.050
And I mean that's, that's a, a huge sort of array of different things that you're bringing together.
00:02:26.110 --> 00:02:28.750
What's your background to have got you here?
00:02:29.639 --> 00:02:39.860
So I guess I would say that I came to systems thinking pretty honestly from a long, long time ago as a, an undergraduate in mechanical engineering.
00:02:39.860 --> 00:02:45.889
So we, one of the core courses was modeling and analysis of dynamic systems.
00:02:45.890 --> 00:02:58.909
And in that kind of dynamic system dynamics model, we actually built the simulations and did the math and, you know, really evaluated all kinds of different physical systems.
00:02:58.930 --> 00:03:09.669
We did not really look at social systems or the impact of social systems on, you know, either environmental or, or physical systems.
00:03:09.670 --> 00:03:20.050
But later when I, I did get a public health degree in environmental science and public health has a really quite a long standing history in thinking in systems.
00:03:20.050 --> 00:03:25.849
And um, although they weren't really as much using the tools that I'm, that I'm currently using.
00:03:26.080 --> 00:03:31.840
I also, uh, have a passion for organizational learning and a participatory processes.
00:03:31.840 --> 00:03:40.990
So, um, I love designing spaces where people can come together and create new knowledge and new ways of thinking.
00:03:41.590 --> 00:03:58.719
And um, my sense has always been that these, uh, deeply contentious policy processes that we see now I'm required new ways to help people have a conversation and the idea of having sort of, um, building together and having an artifact.
00:03:58.990 --> 00:04:10.719
And this is where like, Kumu comes in for me having an artifact to work for actually invites participation and rather than people being across the table kind of disagreeing or pointing fingers are making points.
00:04:10.721 --> 00:04:25.350
It's more shoulder, shoulder to shoulder and it's not just me looking at the system and saying how I see it, but it's me looking at you, looking at the system and that creates a container for a lot more interesting conversation.
00:04:25.350 --> 00:04:28.329
And on that theme, what is it that you're currently working on?
00:04:29.889 --> 00:04:31.060
I know that you're working on various different projects.
00:04:31.170 --> 00:04:39.339
But maybe you can give us a bit of a highlight of those.
00:04:40.060 --> 00:04:40.300
I don't know that I've ever worked across so many time zones as I am today.
00:04:40.300 --> 00:04:47.120
I'm working with two teams, one in India and one in Indonesia that are working with smart cities.
00:04:47.199 --> 00:05:02.589
I have a team in, in Zimbabwe that's a really exciting project that is addressing peace building and rebuilding the social fabric after many decades of divisiveness and conflict.
00:05:02.591 --> 00:05:08.259
I have a team in London that's working with refugees in Jordan.
00:05:09.279 --> 00:05:17.209
I'm working with a team in Hawaii that's got all kinds of things going on and they actually support many systems based projects themselves.
00:05:17.211 --> 00:05:33.250
And then we have a whole area, my colleague Bailey, she's really leading the charge, domestically, in public health, so we've been doing some really exciting projects on adverse childhood experiences and trauma and housing affordability.
00:05:33.250 --> 00:05:35.170
So pretty exciting projects.
00:05:35.170 --> 00:05:36.879
That's a big range, a big list.
00:05:37.360 --> 00:05:58.379
Um, and just so we're working with teams that are working on a lot of really tough and often intractable issues and they're all looking for better ways to, um, build a shared understanding with often with many, many stakeholders around what's going on in the system and then together designing a way forward.
00:05:58.889 --> 00:06:06.899
Um, and that, that has been just super exciting for us as we get to work in those spaces with a lot of different stakeholders.
00:06:08.220 --> 00:06:09.279
It's such an array of projects.
00:06:09.290 --> 00:06:14.860
I almost hope you have a systems map just to kind of hold your, your projects in your head.
00:06:15.759 --> 00:06:38.699
Um, uh, so, so given that you are so busy at the moment, do you, do you actually get a chance to, um, I know you do, but do you get a chance to sort of think about your practice and yeah, maybe we can explore a little bit of what you're doing and maybe a little bit of how Kumu fits into that and a little bit of your edge of learning at the moment.
00:06:41.430 --> 00:06:58.980
For me, the edge of practice really is about how we, how we can more holistically at every level of system, and by that I mean the individual system.
00:06:58.980 --> 00:07:16.350
So when I show up in the space what I'm coming into that social field with, whether it's a frustration, you know, white knuckling it on 395 trying to get in to the city in Washington DC or um, you know, my, my dog just bit the neighbor or whatever it might be.
00:07:16.350 --> 00:07:20.040
If I'm coming in, I'm bringing all of that with me.
00:07:20.519 --> 00:07:24.360
Um, how does that then shape the social field and what happens there?
00:07:24.360 --> 00:07:36.660
Then how teams operate and build shared knowledge, how they build trust, how they build, meaning, how then they work with stakeholders or beneficiaries of.
00:07:36.661 --> 00:07:50.670
And then just how, how things, how a system that's whole and um, and responsive and sensing can, can transform a system much more broadly.
00:07:50.670 --> 00:07:52.990
So I'm starting to think more like this.
00:07:53.269 --> 00:08:03.899
And, and, uh, have, have all these decades built my technical skills and now I'm turning a little bit inward to be sure that I'm showing up and serving my clients.
00:08:03.901 --> 00:08:11.550
So I've been doing some work around like embodied leadership and sort of sensing my, my own system and saying, hey, what's going on here?
00:08:11.550 --> 00:08:24.089
I said something and then being able to notice it, bring it into the space, um, you know, uh, and, and work better together with partners and with systems of all kinds.
00:08:24.120 --> 00:08:27.089
So that's kind of my, my edge of practice.
00:08:27.120 --> 00:08:44.470
And um, and I think that this gets really important too when we're dealing with systems and their complexity and we build these maps and I would say the map is not the territory.
00:08:44.471 --> 00:08:44.889
Very.
00:08:45.759 --> 00:08:49.870
A very famous philosopher said that.
00:08:50.409 --> 00:08:59.309
And basically the idea is that, you know, it's sort of all our beliefs and understanding about what something is.
00:08:59.370 --> 00:09:04.049
It's a um, it's not a model of reality.
00:09:04.051 --> 00:09:10.529
It's our beliefs about reality or some part of or some lens on reality.
00:09:10.530 --> 00:09:15.419
And so the importance that these mats are not perfect, they're wrong, right from.
00:09:15.570 --> 00:09:19.950
And everybody knows the George Box, all models are wrong, some are useful.
00:09:20.690 --> 00:09:41.340
Um, and so I think the thing about that that becomes super important is just, you know, that doing this work and having and fostering these kinds of conversations in the system itself is a system intervention and it brings insight and change.
00:09:41.341 --> 00:09:52.529
So the ability of a system to begin to see itself and see parts of the system, but it also challenges our ways of working and their structural systems that push back.
00:09:52.530 --> 00:09:52.799
Right?
00:09:52.801 --> 00:10:04.379
So most of our organizations, mostly organizations I've worked with still have oversight of some kind, whether it be at the State Department or USAID where I've done projects.
00:10:04.769 --> 00:10:24.450
They still have to do paperwork that flies up the flag pole or you know, my foundation, I'll have boards and um, and there's the sense of, and especially with foundations now and the amazing philanthropists who are really trying to move the needle and hoping of course to see things in their lifetime.
00:10:24.451 --> 00:10:26.549
I think often the question is, well have we had impact?
00:10:28.649 --> 00:10:31.860
And so I think that that becomes a stressor.
00:10:32.169 --> 00:10:45.750
Um, and it really takes a commitment to, to working and practicing together in new ways to be able to begin to start to reframe what that really looks like.
00:10:46.200 --> 00:11:03.990
So, um, and I see that needing to happen, you know, right now a lot of times the, um, the real pain point is in talking about impact and measuring impact in a system where things are really interconnected and complex and you maybe can't attribute change that you might be seeing specifically to your intervention.
00:11:03.990 --> 00:11:21.299
It may be a whole, you know, uh, it may be a whole compilation of things that are helping to shift some but, but at the heart of this impact to me impact and how we feed our sense of impact back into, um, our beliefs about what we're doing and the value we're bringing.
00:11:21.330 --> 00:11:22.679
It all has to do with strategy.
00:11:22.681 --> 00:11:25.980
So like where I really love to camp out, is in the strategy conversation.
00:11:26.549 --> 00:11:36.779
Um, and I kinda like to say that, that we're always either creating, executing or adapting strategy at some level.
00:11:36.779 --> 00:11:44.190
And we're kind of always in that, um, you know, in that process when we're doing this kind of systems type work, right?
00:11:44.191 --> 00:11:52.470
Because we're deep in the work we're zooming in doing and hopefully we're sensing and responding in those very tactical moments.
00:11:52.471 --> 00:11:56.669
But then we zoom out and we try to observe patterns, right?
00:11:56.730 --> 00:12:17.029
All of this is part of strategic practice and, and, um, again, you know, some of these things are hard and, and people we start, we try to have these conversations and um, it can hit touch nerves with different stakeholders and difficult conversations.
00:12:17.030 --> 00:12:18.870
We need a lot of skills.
00:12:19.110 --> 00:12:26.940
So, um, so yeah, I don't want to get too abstract, but those are the places that I'm finding in a super practical way.
00:12:27.210 --> 00:12:42.929
This is really the edge of practice, is being able to, um, both do and be super active, but also noticing and sensing as you, as you're doing so that the system at every level is getting stronger.
00:12:42.990 --> 00:12:49.679
Both of us as individuals and how we show up and how we engage and teams and, and down the line.
00:12:51.000 --> 00:13:12.820
Do you want to give us a bit of a flavor of how, I know this is something that people are struggling with and you're clearly working at the intersection of, almost like a flavor of the practicalities of going from a systems map where, you know, you've really looked at a system and built that systems sight, to strategy or to action.
00:13:12.821 --> 00:13:18.009
What does that look like in a, in your practice and the projects you've been working with recently?
00:13:19.240 --> 00:13:27.100
What I've started to work with this kind of a format that I, it's really simple and it's kind of a type of evaluative inquiry and it's just: what, so what now what?
00:13:28.830 --> 00:13:51.600
And I've adapted it a little bit because I have a what, so what, what if, so that's where I want to get into making hypotheses and then uh, uh, now what, or you know, or how might we, um, so one of the things I really find that's challenging, you know, you get teams really focusing on this first system map is our theory of contexts.
00:13:51.600 --> 00:13:52.980
And it's all about the what?
00:13:53.120 --> 00:13:55.019
Like it's just what's happening here.
00:13:55.020 --> 00:13:55.860
What do we see?
00:13:55.860 --> 00:13:56.669
What do we sense?
00:13:56.671 --> 00:13:59.039
What do we believe about what's happening here?
00:13:59.041 --> 00:14:01.980
What are the voices saying and how do those come together?
00:14:02.309 --> 00:14:06.100
So that's the what we usually do a really good job of getting that first systems map.
00:14:06.899 --> 00:14:19.740
Then the next system map, then on top of that, we want to build another layer of context, which is so, so now we found the underlying patterns where, what's happening, what are the, where's the dynamism happening?
00:14:19.740 --> 00:14:22.759
So that's where we ask people to think about where are the bright spots.
00:14:22.760 --> 00:14:29.549
So maybe it's a little, um, it's, Oh, you know, this community has started holding these spontaneous meetings.
00:14:29.551 --> 00:14:38.009
It started off with a small group and now, you know, there's 25 people that are leaders that are getting together every week to talk about these issues.
00:14:38.010 --> 00:14:42.929
And so that, that would be like a bright spot and sort of what it's doing in the system.
00:14:42.931 --> 00:14:53.090
And we find where there's energy, we find where there's things are frozen or blocked and we do this whole other layer of, of, um, context on top of the map.
00:14:53.091 --> 00:15:01.370
And then you start to play with, you know, the, the, so what, which is what have we already learned from these things.
00:15:01.370 --> 00:15:15.350
So then people will say, well, we learned that you always want to consult this person because if you don't, everything goes, you know, they block everything, so you start to get really concrete about, it's more like what have we already learned.
00:15:15.350 --> 00:15:35.509
And then you start to then I start to get teams to think about, you know, one of the things I love about the idea of leverage and my passion for sort of a, you know, sort of asset based thinking in a community or in a system, you know, my belief is that systems always have everything they need to be healthy and make the change that they need.
00:15:35.510 --> 00:15:37.909
It's a very appreciative approach.
00:15:38.279 --> 00:15:56.779
Um, so you start to have the conversation as, you know, what do we need to amplify or bolster or, or, um, or bring out in, you know, in foster in this community and what, what simultaneously we want to disrupt or mitigate or do we want to bridge a new type of connection or.
00:15:57.049 --> 00:16:02.629
So I think this part really excites me from the sort of appreciative and asset based side of it.
00:16:04.279 --> 00:16:09.350
Get teams starting to think about, you know, what it would mean and use the map.
00:16:09.350 --> 00:16:17.210
We use Kumu so I try to keep, I try to keep my teams looking at the map as long as possible before they go off on their own designs.
00:16:17.820 --> 00:16:18.049
Right.
00:16:18.070 --> 00:16:21.740
Because one thing that's really easy to do, they get the map and then it's like, oh great.
00:16:21.919 --> 00:16:25.509
That strategy that I always knew I was going to do is exactly right.
00:16:26.470 --> 00:16:32.809
So we really get them to stick for a long time in the map.
00:16:32.820 --> 00:16:45.259
And I know one thing you talked about earlier is like, you know, interested in how I use the map and so trying to get teams to understand a lot more about the usefulness and the utility of the artifact itself for storytelling.
00:16:45.260 --> 00:16:56.269
And I always tell teams the use of Kumu rises, at least for the dynamic mapping, rises and falls on your ability to tell a really great story and invite participation.
00:16:56.690 --> 00:17:07.339
That to me is like the game changing part of Kumu and then also that, um, that it can hold all those stories so people in the tool itself.
00:17:07.340 --> 00:17:26.900
And so more and more on my team, we've developed sort of, um, I don't know if there's lack of better, like a standard of care of teams we work with where, um, we, we really commit with them to filling in a very robust storyline.
00:17:26.900 --> 00:17:42.740
Like you said, some of that, uh, you know, that ethnographic, you know, those deep descriptions of um, you know, the stories that are being told, um, so that, that has become super powerful.
00:17:43.579 --> 00:17:47.349
Um, and the same then when we saw our first map, our theory of context are separate.
00:17:47.351 --> 00:17:57.950
Second map, we call it a systemic theory of change, kind of answers that question of like, you know, uh, where might we engage to move this, this entire system to a greater state of health.
00:17:58.190 --> 00:18:09.529
And then the theory of action being really more on the strategy which is starting to get you to the TAC that the tactics and the approaches, the programmatic approaches that you might use to, um, to engage.
00:18:09.559 --> 00:18:15.380
So that's where you're actually designing against where you're seeing leverage in the map.
00:18:15.381 --> 00:18:19.339
And that's where you might take it into a design lab or an innovation lab.
00:18:22.200 --> 00:18:34.849
And all points of this process, I really more and more the other edge of my practices when I started doing this in the qualitative, you know, getting away from the engineering and the defense department, quantitative stuff.
00:18:34.851 --> 00:18:42.990
I, I, um, I worked primarily within foundations and teams that were maybe preparing to go to a board meeting.
00:18:43.019 --> 00:18:49.710
And so it was just, usually it might be a team say sitting in Washington DC kind of talking to themselves.
00:18:49.890 --> 00:18:57.710
It's still pretty useful because you get out a lot of their assumptions, you realize and say, wow, we have a lot of assumptions in here.
00:18:57.720 --> 00:18:59.069
Maybe we better go talk to some people.
00:19:00.559 --> 00:19:03.809
I'm really loving when uh, and encouraging.
00:19:03.839 --> 00:19:21.170
I'm really encouraging my teams to, um, if I'm sitting in London and I've got a project in Jordan, let's go to Jordan and actually do the not just talk to the Jordanian Syrian refugees in Jordan, let's do mapping with them locally.
00:19:21.170 --> 00:19:23.509
And that has been so rewarding.
00:19:23.539 --> 00:19:26.109
And there's some interesting things that happened.
00:19:26.210 --> 00:19:26.690
So I've done that.
00:19:26.750 --> 00:19:33.289
I did this with a very experienced team where I'm, they had done some mapping in their Home Office.
00:19:33.290 --> 00:19:59.349
It's a foundation and then they decided they wanted to go to Nepal and do it with a group of Nepali people and that map got built in I think it got built in a week and a half and they were just stunned at how beautifully it came together because we had the stories we didn't have, you know, we're not sitting back in DC make, you know, like talking about this place way, way far away.
00:19:59.920 --> 00:20:04.960
We're here listening to stories and I think that was a huge eyeopener for me.
00:20:05.240 --> 00:20:06.730
Um, and that's what I said.
00:20:07.420 --> 00:20:16.529
Yeah, this is a tool to use to bring communities together and it's, it's, it itself is a strategic play in a system.
00:20:17.349 --> 00:20:19.660
So I love Kumu I'm a huge fan.
00:20:22.069 --> 00:20:33.109
Thank you so much for sharing about your practice and as always, I have 100 more questions for you, but we'll end the podcast here.
00:20:33.200 --> 00:20:42.849
And if people want to find you and talk to you more about what's what you do and the like how, where, where would they go?
00:20:44.430 --> 00:20:46.960
Well, we do have a, a web page.
00:20:47.789 --> 00:20:50.920
Our new gal hasn't gotten a chance to get in there and update it.
00:20:50.921 --> 00:20:57.549
So many, many of our projects are not, um, listed there yet, but it's just engaginginquiry.com.
00:20:57.970 --> 00:21:15.789
And you can find me specifically at karen@engaginginquiry.com and I'd love to hear from you and geek out with you and probably seen some of you on our slack group and I'm really proud of that amazing community and uh, yeah, so thanks for.
00:21:15.790 --> 00:21:16.630
Thanks for asking.
00:21:16.631 --> 00:21:31.049
And if you ever want to talk more about a strategy impact learning any of those topics, I'd love to come back and talk to you again.
00:00:04.370 --> 00:00:11.099
This is a tool to use to bring communities together and itself is a strategic play in a system.
00:00:15.900 --> 00:00:21.420
Welcome to In Too Deep, the place for meaningful conversations about tackling tough problems.
00:00:23.260 --> 00:00:26.890
We're joined today by Sam Rye, who's hosting the conversation.
00:00:27.120 --> 00:00:44.500
Sam is a self-described unapologetic generalist, has spent time in many places around the globe and is a longtime member of the Kumu community as well as Karen Grattan who is the founder of Engaging Inquiry.
00:00:44.500 --> 00:00:51.369
I think you will be blown away by the depth and breadth of her experience and their firm's mission to bring light to complexity.
00:00:52.000 --> 00:00:52.000
Enjoy.
00:00:52.890 --> 00:00:54.469
My name is Sam Rye.
00:00:54.590 --> 00:00:58.060
Today I'm here with Karen Grattan from Engaging Inquiry.
00:00:58.630 --> 00:01:03.250
I'd love to hear a little bit about your organization and what you do.
00:01:04.599 --> 00:01:04.599
Okay.
00:01:04.600 --> 00:01:06.129
Sam, thanks for having me.
00:01:06.340 --> 00:01:08.500
Well, so let me tell you a little bit about Engaging Inquiry.
00:01:08.530 --> 00:01:28.799
We are a small consulting practice that has basically gotten our wings are through using systems practice to support teams in developing more comprehensive and robust strategies.
00:01:30.489 --> 00:01:39.849
The practice, we primarily use is one that I had the good fortune to codevelop with the systems and complexity team at The Omidyar Group.
00:01:40.299 --> 00:01:57.599
So what we do is we come alongside teams, we call it accompaniment in that what we're trying to do is come and build capacity and grow a team's ability to use some of the tools of systems thinking.
00:01:57.780 --> 00:02:17.319
Specifically we use a lot of dynamic system mapping and actor mapping, um, but more to develop a set of practices that sort of reshape and change the way they think about designing, executing and adapting strategy over time to have impact in the world.
00:02:19.159 --> 00:02:19.810
Awesome.
00:02:19.900 --> 00:02:26.050
And I mean that's, that's a, a huge sort of array of different things that you're bringing together.
00:02:26.110 --> 00:02:28.750
What's your background to have got you here?
00:02:29.639 --> 00:02:39.860
So I guess I would say that I came to systems thinking pretty honestly from a long, long time ago as a, an undergraduate in mechanical engineering.
00:02:39.860 --> 00:02:45.889
So we, one of the core courses was modeling and analysis of dynamic systems.
00:02:45.890 --> 00:02:58.909
And in that kind of dynamic system dynamics model, we actually built the simulations and did the math and, you know, really evaluated all kinds of different physical systems.
00:02:58.930 --> 00:03:09.669
We did not really look at social systems or the impact of social systems on, you know, either environmental or, or physical systems.
00:03:09.670 --> 00:03:20.050
But later when I, I did get a public health degree in environmental science and public health has a really quite a long standing history in thinking in systems.
00:03:20.050 --> 00:03:25.849
And um, although they weren't really as much using the tools that I'm, that I'm currently using.
00:03:26.080 --> 00:03:31.840
I also, uh, have a passion for organizational learning and a participatory processes.
00:03:31.840 --> 00:03:40.990
So, um, I love designing spaces where people can come together and create new knowledge and new ways of thinking.
00:03:41.590 --> 00:03:58.719
And um, my sense has always been that these, uh, deeply contentious policy processes that we see now I'm required new ways to help people have a conversation and the idea of having sort of, um, building together and having an artifact.
00:03:58.990 --> 00:04:10.719
And this is where like, Kumu comes in for me having an artifact to work for actually invites participation and rather than people being across the table kind of disagreeing or pointing fingers are making points.
00:04:10.721 --> 00:04:25.350
It's more shoulder, shoulder to shoulder and it's not just me looking at the system and saying how I see it, but it's me looking at you, looking at the system and that creates a container for a lot more interesting conversation.
00:04:25.350 --> 00:04:28.329
And on that theme, what is it that you're currently working on?
00:04:29.889 --> 00:04:31.060
I know that you're working on various different projects.
00:04:31.170 --> 00:04:39.339
But maybe you can give us a bit of a highlight of those.
00:04:40.060 --> 00:04:40.300
I don't know that I've ever worked across so many time zones as I am today.
00:04:40.300 --> 00:04:47.120
I'm working with two teams, one in India and one in Indonesia that are working with smart cities.
00:04:47.199 --> 00:05:02.589
I have a team in, in Zimbabwe that's a really exciting project that is addressing peace building and rebuilding the social fabric after many decades of divisiveness and conflict.
00:05:02.591 --> 00:05:08.259
I have a team in London that's working with refugees in Jordan.
00:05:09.279 --> 00:05:17.209
I'm working with a team in Hawaii that's got all kinds of things going on and they actually support many systems based projects themselves.
00:05:17.211 --> 00:05:33.250
And then we have a whole area, my colleague Bailey, she's really leading the charge, domestically, in public health, so we've been doing some really exciting projects on adverse childhood experiences and trauma and housing affordability.
00:05:33.250 --> 00:05:35.170
So pretty exciting projects.
00:05:35.170 --> 00:05:36.879
That's a big range, a big list.
00:05:37.360 --> 00:05:58.379
Um, and just so we're working with teams that are working on a lot of really tough and often intractable issues and they're all looking for better ways to, um, build a shared understanding with often with many, many stakeholders around what's going on in the system and then together designing a way forward.
00:05:58.889 --> 00:06:06.899
Um, and that, that has been just super exciting for us as we get to work in those spaces with a lot of different stakeholders.
00:06:08.220 --> 00:06:09.279
It's such an array of projects.
00:06:09.290 --> 00:06:14.860
I almost hope you have a systems map just to kind of hold your, your projects in your head.
00:06:15.759 --> 00:06:38.699
Um, uh, so, so given that you are so busy at the moment, do you, do you actually get a chance to, um, I know you do, but do you get a chance to sort of think about your practice and yeah, maybe we can explore a little bit of what you're doing and maybe a little bit of how Kumu fits into that and a little bit of your edge of learning at the moment.
00:06:41.430 --> 00:06:58.980
For me, the edge of practice really is about how we, how we can more holistically at every level of system, and by that I mean the individual system.
00:06:58.980 --> 00:07:16.350
So when I show up in the space what I'm coming into that social field with, whether it's a frustration, you know, white knuckling it on 395 trying to get in to the city in Washington DC or um, you know, my, my dog just bit the neighbor or whatever it might be.
00:07:16.350 --> 00:07:20.040
If I'm coming in, I'm bringing all of that with me.
00:07:20.519 --> 00:07:24.360
Um, how does that then shape the social field and what happens there?
00:07:24.360 --> 00:07:36.660
Then how teams operate and build shared knowledge, how they build trust, how they build, meaning, how then they work with stakeholders or beneficiaries of.
00:07:36.661 --> 00:07:50.670
And then just how, how things, how a system that's whole and um, and responsive and sensing can, can transform a system much more broadly.
00:07:50.670 --> 00:07:52.990
So I'm starting to think more like this.
00:07:53.269 --> 00:08:03.899
And, and, uh, have, have all these decades built my technical skills and now I'm turning a little bit inward to be sure that I'm showing up and serving my clients.
00:08:03.901 --> 00:08:11.550
So I've been doing some work around like embodied leadership and sort of sensing my, my own system and saying, hey, what's going on here?
00:08:11.550 --> 00:08:24.089
I said something and then being able to notice it, bring it into the space, um, you know, uh, and, and work better together with partners and with systems of all kinds.
00:08:24.120 --> 00:08:27.089
So that's kind of my, my edge of practice.
00:08:27.120 --> 00:08:44.470
And um, and I think that this gets really important too when we're dealing with systems and their complexity and we build these maps and I would say the map is not the territory.
00:08:44.471 --> 00:08:44.889
Very.
00:08:45.759 --> 00:08:49.870
A very famous philosopher said that.
00:08:50.409 --> 00:08:59.309
And basically the idea is that, you know, it's sort of all our beliefs and understanding about what something is.
00:08:59.370 --> 00:09:04.049
It's a um, it's not a model of reality.
00:09:04.051 --> 00:09:10.529
It's our beliefs about reality or some part of or some lens on reality.
00:09:10.530 --> 00:09:15.419
And so the importance that these mats are not perfect, they're wrong, right from.
00:09:15.570 --> 00:09:19.950
And everybody knows the George Box, all models are wrong, some are useful.
00:09:20.690 --> 00:09:41.340
Um, and so I think the thing about that that becomes super important is just, you know, that doing this work and having and fostering these kinds of conversations in the system itself is a system intervention and it brings insight and change.
00:09:41.341 --> 00:09:52.529
So the ability of a system to begin to see itself and see parts of the system, but it also challenges our ways of working and their structural systems that push back.
00:09:52.530 --> 00:09:52.799
Right?
00:09:52.801 --> 00:10:04.379
So most of our organizations, mostly organizations I've worked with still have oversight of some kind, whether it be at the State Department or USAID where I've done projects.
00:10:04.769 --> 00:10:24.450
They still have to do paperwork that flies up the flag pole or you know, my foundation, I'll have boards and um, and there's the sense of, and especially with foundations now and the amazing philanthropists who are really trying to move the needle and hoping of course to see things in their lifetime.
00:10:24.451 --> 00:10:26.549
I think often the question is, well have we had impact?
00:10:28.649 --> 00:10:31.860
And so I think that that becomes a stressor.
00:10:32.169 --> 00:10:45.750
Um, and it really takes a commitment to, to working and practicing together in new ways to be able to begin to start to reframe what that really looks like.
00:10:46.200 --> 00:11:03.990
So, um, and I see that needing to happen, you know, right now a lot of times the, um, the real pain point is in talking about impact and measuring impact in a system where things are really interconnected and complex and you maybe can't attribute change that you might be seeing specifically to your intervention.
00:11:03.990 --> 00:11:21.299
It may be a whole, you know, uh, it may be a whole compilation of things that are helping to shift some but, but at the heart of this impact to me impact and how we feed our sense of impact back into, um, our beliefs about what we're doing and the value we're bringing.
00:11:21.330 --> 00:11:22.679
It all has to do with strategy.
00:11:22.681 --> 00:11:25.980
So like where I really love to camp out, is in the strategy conversation.
00:11:26.549 --> 00:11:36.779
Um, and I kinda like to say that, that we're always either creating, executing or adapting strategy at some level.
00:11:36.779 --> 00:11:44.190
And we're kind of always in that, um, you know, in that process when we're doing this kind of systems type work, right?
00:11:44.191 --> 00:11:52.470
Because we're deep in the work we're zooming in doing and hopefully we're sensing and responding in those very tactical moments.
00:11:52.471 --> 00:11:56.669
But then we zoom out and we try to observe patterns, right?
00:11:56.730 --> 00:12:17.029
All of this is part of strategic practice and, and, um, again, you know, some of these things are hard and, and people we start, we try to have these conversations and um, it can hit touch nerves with different stakeholders and difficult conversations.
00:12:17.030 --> 00:12:18.870
We need a lot of skills.
00:12:19.110 --> 00:12:26.940
So, um, so yeah, I don't want to get too abstract, but those are the places that I'm finding in a super practical way.
00:12:27.210 --> 00:12:42.929
This is really the edge of practice, is being able to, um, both do and be super active, but also noticing and sensing as you, as you're doing so that the system at every level is getting stronger.
00:12:42.990 --> 00:12:49.679
Both of us as individuals and how we show up and how we engage and teams and, and down the line.
00:12:51.000 --> 00:13:12.820
Do you want to give us a bit of a flavor of how, I know this is something that people are struggling with and you're clearly working at the intersection of, almost like a flavor of the practicalities of going from a systems map where, you know, you've really looked at a system and built that systems sight, to strategy or to action.
00:13:12.821 --> 00:13:18.009
What does that look like in a, in your practice and the projects you've been working with recently?
00:13:19.240 --> 00:13:27.100
What I've started to work with this kind of a format that I, it's really simple and it's kind of a type of evaluative inquiry and it's just: what, so what now what?
00:13:28.830 --> 00:13:51.600
And I've adapted it a little bit because I have a what, so what, what if, so that's where I want to get into making hypotheses and then uh, uh, now what, or you know, or how might we, um, so one of the things I really find that's challenging, you know, you get teams really focusing on this first system map is our theory of contexts.
00:13:51.600 --> 00:13:52.980
And it's all about the what?
00:13:53.120 --> 00:13:55.019
Like it's just what's happening here.
00:13:55.020 --> 00:13:55.860
What do we see?
00:13:55.860 --> 00:13:56.669
What do we sense?
00:13:56.671 --> 00:13:59.039
What do we believe about what's happening here?
00:13:59.041 --> 00:14:01.980
What are the voices saying and how do those come together?
00:14:02.309 --> 00:14:06.100
So that's the what we usually do a really good job of getting that first systems map.
00:14:06.899 --> 00:14:19.740
Then the next system map, then on top of that, we want to build another layer of context, which is so, so now we found the underlying patterns where, what's happening, what are the, where's the dynamism happening?
00:14:19.740 --> 00:14:22.759
So that's where we ask people to think about where are the bright spots.
00:14:22.760 --> 00:14:29.549
So maybe it's a little, um, it's, Oh, you know, this community has started holding these spontaneous meetings.
00:14:29.551 --> 00:14:38.009
It started off with a small group and now, you know, there's 25 people that are leaders that are getting together every week to talk about these issues.
00:14:38.010 --> 00:14:42.929
And so that, that would be like a bright spot and sort of what it's doing in the system.
00:14:42.931 --> 00:14:53.090
And we find where there's energy, we find where there's things are frozen or blocked and we do this whole other layer of, of, um, context on top of the map.
00:14:53.091 --> 00:15:01.370
And then you start to play with, you know, the, the, so what, which is what have we already learned from these things.
00:15:01.370 --> 00:15:15.350
So then people will say, well, we learned that you always want to consult this person because if you don't, everything goes, you know, they block everything, so you start to get really concrete about, it's more like what have we already learned.
00:15:15.350 --> 00:15:35.509
And then you start to then I start to get teams to think about, you know, one of the things I love about the idea of leverage and my passion for sort of a, you know, sort of asset based thinking in a community or in a system, you know, my belief is that systems always have everything they need to be healthy and make the change that they need.
00:15:35.510 --> 00:15:37.909
It's a very appreciative approach.
00:15:38.279 --> 00:15:56.779
Um, so you start to have the conversation as, you know, what do we need to amplify or bolster or, or, um, or bring out in, you know, in foster in this community and what, what simultaneously we want to disrupt or mitigate or do we want to bridge a new type of connection or.
00:15:57.049 --> 00:16:02.629
So I think this part really excites me from the sort of appreciative and asset based side of it.
00:16:04.279 --> 00:16:09.350
Get teams starting to think about, you know, what it would mean and use the map.
00:16:09.350 --> 00:16:17.210
We use Kumu so I try to keep, I try to keep my teams looking at the map as long as possible before they go off on their own designs.
00:16:17.820 --> 00:16:18.049
Right.
00:16:18.070 --> 00:16:21.740
Because one thing that's really easy to do, they get the map and then it's like, oh great.
00:16:21.919 --> 00:16:25.509
That strategy that I always knew I was going to do is exactly right.
00:16:26.470 --> 00:16:32.809
So we really get them to stick for a long time in the map.
00:16:32.820 --> 00:16:45.259
And I know one thing you talked about earlier is like, you know, interested in how I use the map and so trying to get teams to understand a lot more about the usefulness and the utility of the artifact itself for storytelling.
00:16:45.260 --> 00:16:56.269
And I always tell teams the use of Kumu rises, at least for the dynamic mapping, rises and falls on your ability to tell a really great story and invite participation.
00:16:56.690 --> 00:17:07.339
That to me is like the game changing part of Kumu and then also that, um, that it can hold all those stories so people in the tool itself.
00:17:07.340 --> 00:17:26.900
And so more and more on my team, we've developed sort of, um, I don't know if there's lack of better, like a standard of care of teams we work with where, um, we, we really commit with them to filling in a very robust storyline.
00:17:26.900 --> 00:17:42.740
Like you said, some of that, uh, you know, that ethnographic, you know, those deep descriptions of um, you know, the stories that are being told, um, so that, that has become super powerful.
00:17:43.579 --> 00:17:47.349
Um, and the same then when we saw our first map, our theory of context are separate.
00:17:47.351 --> 00:17:57.950
Second map, we call it a systemic theory of change, kind of answers that question of like, you know, uh, where might we engage to move this, this entire system to a greater state of health.
00:17:58.190 --> 00:18:09.529
And then the theory of action being really more on the strategy which is starting to get you to the TAC that the tactics and the approaches, the programmatic approaches that you might use to, um, to engage.
00:18:09.559 --> 00:18:15.380
So that's where you're actually designing against where you're seeing leverage in the map.
00:18:15.381 --> 00:18:19.339
And that's where you might take it into a design lab or an innovation lab.
00:18:22.200 --> 00:18:34.849
And all points of this process, I really more and more the other edge of my practices when I started doing this in the qualitative, you know, getting away from the engineering and the defense department, quantitative stuff.
00:18:34.851 --> 00:18:42.990
I, I, um, I worked primarily within foundations and teams that were maybe preparing to go to a board meeting.
00:18:43.019 --> 00:18:49.710
And so it was just, usually it might be a team say sitting in Washington DC kind of talking to themselves.
00:18:49.890 --> 00:18:57.710
It's still pretty useful because you get out a lot of their assumptions, you realize and say, wow, we have a lot of assumptions in here.
00:18:57.720 --> 00:18:59.069
Maybe we better go talk to some people.
00:19:00.559 --> 00:19:03.809
I'm really loving when uh, and encouraging.
00:19:03.839 --> 00:19:21.170
I'm really encouraging my teams to, um, if I'm sitting in London and I've got a project in Jordan, let's go to Jordan and actually do the not just talk to the Jordanian Syrian refugees in Jordan, let's do mapping with them locally.
00:19:21.170 --> 00:19:23.509
And that has been so rewarding.
00:19:23.539 --> 00:19:26.109
And there's some interesting things that happened.
00:19:26.210 --> 00:19:26.690
So I've done that.
00:19:26.750 --> 00:19:33.289
I did this with a very experienced team where I'm, they had done some mapping in their Home Office.
00:19:33.290 --> 00:19:59.349
It's a foundation and then they decided they wanted to go to Nepal and do it with a group of Nepali people and that map got built in I think it got built in a week and a half and they were just stunned at how beautifully it came together because we had the stories we didn't have, you know, we're not sitting back in DC make, you know, like talking about this place way, way far away.
00:19:59.920 --> 00:20:04.960
We're here listening to stories and I think that was a huge eyeopener for me.
00:20:05.240 --> 00:20:06.730
Um, and that's what I said.
00:20:07.420 --> 00:20:16.529
Yeah, this is a tool to use to bring communities together and it's, it's, it itself is a strategic play in a system.
00:20:17.349 --> 00:20:19.660
So I love Kumu I'm a huge fan.
00:20:22.069 --> 00:20:33.109
Thank you so much for sharing about your practice and as always, I have 100 more questions for you, but we'll end the podcast here.
00:20:33.200 --> 00:20:42.849
And if people want to find you and talk to you more about what's what you do and the like how, where, where would they go?
00:20:44.430 --> 00:20:46.960
Well, we do have a, a web page.
00:20:47.789 --> 00:20:50.920
Our new gal hasn't gotten a chance to get in there and update it.
00:20:50.921 --> 00:20:57.549
So many, many of our projects are not, um, listed there yet, but it's just engaginginquiry.com.
00:20:57.970 --> 00:21:15.789
And you can find me specifically at karen@engaginginquiry.com and I'd love to hear from you and geek out with you and probably seen some of you on our slack group and I'm really proud of that amazing community and uh, yeah, so thanks for.
00:21:15.790 --> 00:21:16.630
Thanks for asking.
00:21:16.631 --> 00:21:31.049
And if you ever want to talk more about a strategy impact learning any of those topics, I'd love to come back and talk to you again.
