INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO EPISODIO
Cognitive Bias in Forensic Pathology Decisions. Itiel Dror from University College London shows that medical examiner decisions can be influenced by the non-medical information to which the experts are exposed, and argues for restrictions on the ways in which medical examiners use such information.
Inglese
Stati Uniti
TRASCRIZIONE 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
CERCA TRA GLI EPISODI PASSATI
Cerca gli episodi passati di Excited Utterance.
ALTRI EPISODI IN QUESTO PODCAST
Strategy for Strategy's Sake. Edith Beerdsen from Temple University asks whether strategic or "sporting" behavior has any place in a system of legal proof, and when being clever goes too far.
Children and the Making of Modern Evidence Law. Laura Savarese from Michigan State University discusses the role of children’s testimony and nineteenth-century child protection laws in the development of the law of evidence.
The Evidentiary Use and Misuse of Forensic Musicology in Copyright Litigation. Fred Yen from Boston College discusses the use of musicology experts in copyright litigation and what they should and should not be permitted to testify about.
Antiracist Expert Evidence. Asess Bhasin from the University of Maryland and Jasmine Gonzales Rose from Boston University discuss the ways in which expert evidence can address racism and racial discrimination in our system of evidence and proof.
Defending Due Process. Brandon Garrett from Duke University discusses his new book, Defending Due Process: Why Fairness Matters in a Polarized World.
Dichiarazione di non responsabilità: Il podcast e la grafica incorporati in questa pagina provengono da Ed Cheng / Alex Nunn, che è di proprietà del suo proprietario e non è affiliato o approvato da Listen Notes, Inc.
MODIFICA
Grazie, ci hai aiutato a mantenere aggiornato il database dei podcast.
