INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO EPISODIO
Marco Möller is a computer scientist, physicist, and serial entrepreneur. He’s passionate about electrical transportation and recently turned his attention to open sourcing the world of EV charging.
In this episode we talked about:
🔋 The company Marco sold to Intel and its impact on climate change through drone technology
🚗 The current state of the EV market in Europe, including growth and price trends
🔌 Common concerns about switching to electric cars and how to address them
⚙️ Marco's new company Pionix and its open-source EV-charger operating system, Base Camp
💼 The stakeholders involved in the EV charging space and the role of collaboration
🕵️♂️ Resistance to open-sourcing EV charging and the industries' changing perspectives on open source
#climatetech #EVcharging #opensource
👨💻 Hiring developers? You need to look at Ukraine, where I've been hiring exclusively since 2018. Set up a no-stress needs assessment at wild.codes/climate. Podcast listeners get $1k off their first hire.
📈 B2B content to create and capture leads: book 30 minutes with Tom for free at grizzle.io/climate
🧑💼 Growing your team across Europe? Grab a free consultation and hire without hassle: parakar.eu/climate
IN QUESTO EPISODIO
MOSTRA NOTE 🔗
TRASCRIZIONE 🔗
00:00:54.969 --> 00:00:59.756
Welcome to another Climate Tech Podcast interviews with the people trying to save us from ourselves.
00:00:59.756 --> 00:01:04.891
Marco Moeller is a serial entrepreneur with a red thread that runs through electrical transportation.
00:01:04.891 --> 00:01:08.689
Today he's focused on open sourcing the world of EV charging.
00:01:08.689 --> 00:01:12.450
I reached Marco at home between Karlsruhe and Heidelberg in Germany.
00:01:12.450 --> 00:01:13.843
I'm Ryan Grant.
00:01:13.843 --> 00:01:19.507
Little Thanks for being here, marco, welcome to the podcast.
00:01:20.000 --> 00:01:22.408
Thanks, ryan, for having me Really really looking forward to this.
00:01:23.319 --> 00:01:30.014
You're a computer scientist and physicist by background, as well as a serial entrepreneur who sold a company to Intel.
00:01:30.014 --> 00:01:32.908
So, first of all, not bad, you're doing pretty well.
00:01:32.908 --> 00:01:35.014
It looks like the company to Intel.
00:01:35.014 --> 00:01:37.340
So, first of all, not bad, you're doing pretty well, it looks like.
00:01:37.340 --> 00:01:41.430
When did you know that you wanted to combine your passion for technology with entrepreneurship?
00:01:41.430 --> 00:01:42.075
You're still quite a young guy.
00:01:42.094 --> 00:01:42.960
Yeah, maybe I look like that, I don't know.
00:01:42.960 --> 00:01:46.890
At least, when I was 20, I always had to show my passport and clubs.
00:01:46.890 --> 00:01:47.731
That was annoying.
00:01:47.731 --> 00:01:49.741
Yes, how did I get there?
00:01:49.741 --> 00:02:02.911
My dad was a farmer and then he transitioned to becoming a trader for beekeeping equipment and that was when I was five and then I started helping in the shop selling stuff to people.
00:02:02.911 --> 00:02:13.308
At the same time, I was super interested in tech and, yeah, really early on I had the idea like, no, no, I want to build something myself and I just I don't know continuing the shop of my dad.
00:02:18.379 --> 00:02:19.383
So in a way, I guess it started really early.
00:02:19.383 --> 00:02:20.669
Okay, so you're a computer scientist, physicist and beekeeper.
00:02:20.689 --> 00:02:22.777
I should add to it yes, you're running that as a teenager then, or what?
00:02:22.777 --> 00:02:24.423
Yeah, I at least.
00:02:24.423 --> 00:02:28.093
I was running a beekeeping shop as a teenager, but I also still have some beehives.
00:02:28.114 --> 00:02:32.927
Yeah very cool, okay, and I mean, what was the?
00:02:32.927 --> 00:02:36.193
How did you shift from that and getting involved in technology?
00:02:36.193 --> 00:02:38.427
What was your first technology play?
00:02:39.340 --> 00:02:40.042
In, I don't know.
00:02:40.042 --> 00:02:45.091
In school, seventh, eighth grade I was always doing coding in my free time.
00:02:45.091 --> 00:02:46.713
I even started earlier.
00:02:46.713 --> 00:02:50.811
And then after 10th grade, I had to decide what kind of job I learned.
00:02:50.811 --> 00:02:52.948
Do I go the high school university route or not?
00:02:52.948 --> 00:02:54.092
And I had really really bad grades in languages, so almost had to decide what kind of job I learned.
00:02:54.092 --> 00:02:54.477
Do I go the high school university route or not?
00:02:54.477 --> 00:02:57.099
And I had really really bad grades in languages so I almost had to repeat some classes.
00:02:57.501 --> 00:03:03.973
So I decided, okay, let's go a detour on the way to university and go with some technical education first.
00:03:03.973 --> 00:03:10.453
And then it went technical, because it was just way more interesting than just learning how to trade goods.
00:03:10.453 --> 00:03:12.847
That's kind of what I was already doing before.
00:03:12.847 --> 00:03:19.449
So I decided for adding on the tech route and within that I learned how to fix car radius at Bosch Blaupunkt.
00:03:19.449 --> 00:03:27.188
Back then what really really catched me on fire was a teacher coming there and asked like oh interesting, you have all these people learning the job here.
00:03:27.188 --> 00:03:30.229
Do you want to make them participate in some competition?
00:03:30.229 --> 00:03:38.765
So we have this human force in Germany which is all about making your own science or tech project and then presenting it to a jury and that was amazing.
00:03:38.765 --> 00:03:42.246
And this is the kind of folks I'm still working with, literally.
00:03:42.387 --> 00:03:43.108
Okay, very cool.
00:03:43.108 --> 00:03:47.968
And so you with the car radios, you had this kind of hardware drive at the beginning.
00:03:47.968 --> 00:03:50.724
We'll talk about the project you're working on now in just a moment.
00:03:50.724 --> 00:04:01.849
But I want to hear a bit about the company that you sold to Intel, which was a drone software company called Mavinci which is an awesome name, so M-A-V-I-N-C-I and tell us a bit about what it did.
00:04:01.849 --> 00:04:07.920
And I'm curious you know I've over the past couple of years, for a variety of reasons, gotten really interested in drones myself.
00:04:07.920 --> 00:04:14.209
What possibilities do you see for drones today in the fight against climate change, eight years after you sold the company?
00:04:14.209 --> 00:04:15.850
Okay, so many questions at once.
00:04:16.833 --> 00:04:18.775
So how do we get into drones again?
00:04:18.775 --> 00:04:29.487
This young scientist, double a friend of mine from there, was always hobbyist that they remote plane pilot and he wanted to automate that just for a fun project.
00:04:29.487 --> 00:04:34.066
And then he got professor, convinced that this is his uh, deeply promo thesis.
00:04:34.066 --> 00:04:37.442
And then afterwards it was done and it was too sad to throw it away.
00:04:37.442 --> 00:04:40.711
So he asked some friends if we should make a company out of it and we did.
00:04:40.711 --> 00:04:42.788
That turned out into Mavinci.
00:04:43.151 --> 00:04:47.995
Back then drones have been called micro air vehicles, so MAV, that's where the name was coming from.
00:04:47.995 --> 00:04:53.667
Naming is so hard, believe me, and also everyone thinks you're an Italian company if you call yourself Mavinci.
00:04:53.667 --> 00:04:55.850
Anyway, so fast forward.
00:04:55.850 --> 00:04:59.155
We mainly worked in mapping and construction.
00:04:59.155 --> 00:05:08.269
So a lot of, let's say, big road sites, big civil engineering things, bridges and a lot of that, a lot of mining.
00:05:08.269 --> 00:05:18.009
So I think our first customers have been all from Australia, this big coal mines making 3D mapping so they know where to dig next and how to dig there.
00:05:18.009 --> 00:05:21.790
So in a way it was bad for climate change, I would say.
00:05:21.790 --> 00:05:29.887
Then we sold the company 26 into Intel, had an interesting ride with another drone company there, acquired to try to scale this.
00:05:29.887 --> 00:05:33.048
Then our entire industry got disrupted by open source.
00:05:33.048 --> 00:05:35.683
So that's a bridge to my next topic, what I'm doing in the future.
00:05:35.683 --> 00:05:38.611
But also, in a way, we got sick of drones.
00:05:38.611 --> 00:05:40.343
We want to do the next tiny thing.
00:05:40.824 --> 00:05:46.144
Drones turned out to be so complicated If you want to go out of a niche because of all of that regulation.
00:05:46.144 --> 00:06:08.115
I think, in a way, the war is now accelerating this entire drone stuff quite a bit because I think I would say, near to front lines on military use, no one cares about certification or you have different processes at least, and money also is, let's say, more flexible, and I hope this will, let's say, shine back to the civil side and do some improvements there.
00:06:08.115 --> 00:06:10.622
And fighting climate change hard to tell.
00:06:10.622 --> 00:06:13.267
I think drones are, in a way, a bit overinflated.
00:06:13.267 --> 00:06:16.533
But what I'm really looking forward is electric aviation in general.
00:06:16.533 --> 00:06:19.122
So let's say bigger drones, not about so much.
00:06:19.161 --> 00:06:24.132
Let's say, replacing every public omnibus or tube with drones.
00:06:24.132 --> 00:06:25.584
That's crazy ideas.
00:06:25.584 --> 00:06:37.747
This will not fly, but regional aircrafts, all this especially in these low-density countries, northern Europe, there's a lot of regional flights and I know people try to fight them.
00:06:37.747 --> 00:06:44.870
But if you do them electric, actually I think it's even better than building additional roads, additional rails, because you need way less infrastructure.
00:06:44.870 --> 00:06:47.728
We have to put way less CO2 in concrete and things like that.
00:06:47.728 --> 00:06:59.651
So I think electric aviation if you scale it up and use it properly and replacing things which are nasty, that can be a big thing, and I think the drones can be a forefront of that.
00:06:59.651 --> 00:07:00.819
So I have seen that in my career.
00:07:01.161 --> 00:07:14.139
I had Maxime Meyers, the CEO and founder of S2 Air, on the podcast recently and he has founded this new platform for reducing especially contrails and reducing kind of the climate impacts of aviation currently.
00:07:14.139 --> 00:07:30.872
But he spent most of his career at Airbus working on the vertical takeoff and landing electrical kind of vehicles and it sounds like there's a lot of interest there industry wide and we'll see these especially for trips to the airport, funnily enough.
00:07:31.319 --> 00:07:34.971
So I think in general this is a bit overinflated, the drone story.
00:07:34.971 --> 00:07:38.605
But there are exciting things Commutes maybe.
00:07:38.605 --> 00:07:44.586
I think I would personally more bet on the regional transportation instead of, I don't know, taking 1% of the cars off the road.
00:07:44.586 --> 00:07:49.622
If you have the road already there, just stick with cars or buses or tubes or whatever.
00:07:49.622 --> 00:07:51.500
That's just way more scalable.
00:07:51.500 --> 00:07:58.129
I think this drone thing and this urban transportation in air is not as scalable as people hope it will be.
00:07:58.129 --> 00:08:01.469
But regional flights replacing that I'm totally all in.
00:08:01.469 --> 00:08:16.632
And there's another interesting side effect Now that the founder I learned on my way also sold his company to Intel, is now building electric boats and with foiling and you can remove 90% of the drag, make it way more fuel efficient.
00:08:16.632 --> 00:08:22.885
But it's a complex, let's say regulation or let's say steering problem how to control the flaps and the foils.
00:08:22.885 --> 00:08:26.399
And this seems to be similar to what he's done in drones before.
00:08:26.399 --> 00:08:31.173
So in a way you can make transvelocity transfer also to, let's say, non-air parts.
00:08:31.935 --> 00:08:37.187
Okay, so let's get to the heart of the matter, what you're working on right now, which is electric vehicle charging.
00:08:37.187 --> 00:08:43.207
Before we talk too much about the project itself, what do people need to know about the EV market in Europe?
00:08:43.207 --> 00:08:44.677
So is it still growing?
00:08:44.677 --> 00:08:47.245
Is the price dropping relative to traditional vehicles?
00:08:47.835 --> 00:08:54.129
So it's growing, but there are some countries where it's doing less well and some countries where it's doing amazing.
00:08:54.129 --> 00:08:56.221
So I think growth has a bit slowed down.
00:08:56.221 --> 00:08:57.706
In general there's a robust growth.
00:08:57.706 --> 00:08:59.399
Germany has a bit of decline.
00:08:59.399 --> 00:09:03.426
I think Italy has a lot of decline and I think everyone else is doing quite well.
00:09:04.096 --> 00:09:05.702
I think Germany has a mood problem.
00:09:05.702 --> 00:09:13.594
So they abruptly had to cancel all subsidies because of some highest court ruling regarding governmental spending.
00:09:13.594 --> 00:09:16.144
They had to cut somewhere in panic mode.
00:09:16.144 --> 00:09:17.759
But interestingly, what happened?
00:09:17.759 --> 00:09:29.426
At the same time, I think within a couple of months, electric vehicles have been at the price point without subsidies, as they've been with subsidies before, so the price dropping is fast now.
00:09:29.426 --> 00:09:34.999
So the really thing, what's holding us back is a mood and perception in Germany and, I think, in Italy.
00:09:34.999 --> 00:10:28.947
So from what I read, this is kind of orchestrated by the government that tried to keep it as small as possible, and everyone else who has not so much vested interest in vehicles is doing actually better than us.
00:10:28.947 --> 00:10:34.507
And I think in the US I heard similar things that it's growing but, let's say, slower than expected.
00:10:34.507 --> 00:10:37.199
But I think globally it's doing amazing If you look on.
00:10:37.199 --> 00:10:43.269
What surprises me quite a bit is that this global south is really really catching up way faster than expected.
00:10:43.269 --> 00:10:46.745
Like Brazil, 1,100% annual growth rate.
00:10:46.745 --> 00:10:49.793
So they will be faster than Germany in a year.
00:10:49.793 --> 00:10:50.596
That's my prediction.
00:10:50.677 --> 00:10:55.258
So I'm thinking of a cartoon that was on your LinkedIn profile that illustrates this point pretty well.
00:10:55.258 --> 00:11:09.048
But if there's a listener who's thinking about switching from a traditional car to an electric car and is worried about the things we're used to hearing about, like range charging time, these other hesitations, what would you say to them now, in 2024?
00:11:10.256 --> 00:11:20.220
I'm driving electric for I don't know five years now and a lot of my friends and there's like a few simple rules like don't charge at really really old fast chargers because they're typically broken.
00:11:20.220 --> 00:11:25.096
It's part of the problem we try to fix and you typically can see it at the power rating 50 kilowatts.
00:11:25.096 --> 00:11:25.879
Don't go there.
00:11:25.879 --> 00:11:26.984
That's the old ones.
00:11:26.984 --> 00:11:30.485
But this is only a very few percentage, like two or three.
00:11:30.485 --> 00:11:39.750
The majority of the infrastructure is new and well working or way better working, so you have to get used to it a bit.
00:11:39.673 --> 00:11:44.216
In the beginning, like in the first I don't know, road trip might be an extension, like first time driving cross nations, but from the second time it gets boring.
00:11:45.100 --> 00:12:04.516
And the total cost of ownership, especially if you're living not in a city but in the suburbs where you can park at home, it's so much lower with electricity cost and especially if you charge at home or at work, this is really going well and if you look on the electricity prices there are some numbers out in the media oh how expensive it can be.
00:12:04.877 --> 00:12:06.382
But it can also be really, really cheap.
00:12:06.382 --> 00:12:25.384
If you just going once on the comparison side and picking a cheap contract, I think it's cheaper to drive electric, I think the range of anxiety is totally not there, not justified, if a car was just 400 kilometer range and this is, I would say, the lower end of what I would recommend and typically the car holds longer than me or my family.
00:12:25.384 --> 00:12:32.128
So typically we're not charging because we had to charge, but because someone had to go to the toilet, need some food, need some fresh air.
00:12:32.128 --> 00:12:38.822
Yeah, I think that's reasonable where the cars are and it's evolving quickly.
00:12:38.822 --> 00:12:49.182
Price-wise, there's some incredible price drops ahead from, we hear, from China, from the battery market, which will then penetrate over, I would say, next year or so, into the car market.
00:12:49.182 --> 00:12:51.322
This is really kicking off in the next years.
00:12:51.774 --> 00:12:55.495
So the charging infrastructure is getting better, but it still remains quite proprietary.
00:12:55.495 --> 00:12:58.822
And that's kind of where you're stepping in to open source the space.
00:12:58.822 --> 00:13:07.487
So your company, pionix, you've created a software platform called Basecamp that you call an open source EV charging OS or operating system.
00:13:07.487 --> 00:13:19.666
So maybe talk for those of us who don't yet haven't experienced this at the charging pump or the charging stations along the way what does the infrastructure look like and why is it not open source yet?
00:13:20.175 --> 00:13:24.105
So, first of all, charging is quite different than fueling.
00:13:24.105 --> 00:13:27.966
I mean charging you're basically putting a pipe into another pipe and mechanically had to fit.
00:13:27.966 --> 00:13:30.523
Then you can press a button and some liquid flows through.
00:13:30.523 --> 00:13:35.177
So there's no, let's say, advanced digital things going on For charging.
00:13:35.177 --> 00:13:48.365
Basically, your car and the charging station are connecting over, let's say, a data link and exchanging data, and then the charging station is connecting to the internet and exchanging data for payment and for authorization and whatnot.
00:13:48.365 --> 00:13:51.139
And this makes it technically a bit more challenging.
00:13:51.139 --> 00:14:06.105
But from the user experience, typically you just have a payment card, go to the charging station, swipe it, press a button which cable you want to use and plug it in and then it starts charging, except the cases where it fails for whatever reason.
00:14:06.105 --> 00:14:08.583
Yeah, so it could be quite unspectaculous.
00:14:08.583 --> 00:14:10.261
Why is it not open source yet?
00:14:10.261 --> 00:14:11.196
Maybe?
00:14:11.216 --> 00:14:15.243
Coming back to my drone history, so I also did my research.
00:14:15.243 --> 00:14:16.940
You can see this pattern all over the place.
00:14:16.940 --> 00:14:24.584
Whenever something new emerged, like a computer or a phone or whatever, the company invests quite some money to make it work.
00:14:24.584 --> 00:14:27.283
So they want to sell it, including the software.
00:14:27.283 --> 00:14:35.364
Over time it gets boring because a thousand companies have done it, and then there's standards in place, so every car and every charging station are compatible.
00:14:35.815 --> 00:14:37.161
So you can't do whatever you want.
00:14:37.161 --> 00:14:46.320
You're anyway restricted by the technology effects out there, like when you're programming a new web browser, you still have to be compatible with every fucking website out there.
00:14:46.320 --> 00:14:48.018
So you can't do whatever you want.
00:14:48.018 --> 00:14:58.719
You have to work with the environment and when you're in such, let's say, a grown-up market, a lot of this work and software development is actually in a way wasted because it's commoditized.
00:14:58.719 --> 00:15:00.301
So everyone can do it.
00:15:00.301 --> 00:15:01.402
You're not special.
00:15:01.402 --> 00:15:03.545
Yeah, I can charge a car, guess what?
00:15:03.545 --> 00:15:05.826
You're one of a thousand charging station providers.
00:15:05.826 --> 00:15:07.950
This is the one job you had to do.
00:15:07.950 --> 00:15:09.471
So you can't win with that argument.
00:15:09.471 --> 00:15:11.777
I have software to charge a car.
00:15:11.777 --> 00:15:27.223
So when it's not worth it in commodity but at the same time super hard and complicated to solve and fast evolving, then you need collaborative approaches and you can just share that work among the companies and can accelerate the entire industry and you're not losing anything, you're just winning.
00:15:27.223 --> 00:15:32.362
And I think in my opinion, it's a natural evolution you see in a lot of industries when they mature.
00:15:32.743 --> 00:15:34.636
And so nobody wants to be the beta.
00:15:34.636 --> 00:15:43.469
Everyone wants to be the VHS and make sure that they're sticking around and not having this very expensive proprietary thing that's going to fail because it's not compatible with everything else.
00:15:43.830 --> 00:15:43.970
Yeah.
00:15:43.970 --> 00:15:47.826
So I think from the user perspective, end of the day, you should just not care.
00:15:47.826 --> 00:15:55.408
You're just plugging in your cable that charges and our promise would be yeah, it recharges every single time.
00:15:55.408 --> 00:15:57.363
It's not fading with any weird car.
00:15:57.363 --> 00:16:15.302
And just because you buy the early bird customers for this new Chinese BYD car should not mean you're suffering out there charging and or you just approach on this new charge pool from this new company entering the market had little experience how to do that.
00:16:15.302 --> 00:16:17.341
That should not giving a downside to you.
00:16:17.341 --> 00:16:18.941
So what our approach?
00:16:18.982 --> 00:16:30.706
At the moment we are going to all the charging station vendors and helping them to do the software and, let's say, the base layer for software, so they, on top of that, do all the juicy custom stuff.
00:16:30.706 --> 00:16:33.464
Let's make some special and we take care of the boring things.
00:16:33.464 --> 00:16:35.161
And you mentioned open source.
00:16:35.161 --> 00:16:43.836
We're not doing that alone, because what we're ultimately doing here is having one piece of software and it should in a way become a monopole so everyone is using it.
00:16:43.836 --> 00:16:50.180
But we don't want to go the Windows route, where everyone hates you at the end but just can't go away because it's the standard.
00:16:50.180 --> 00:16:56.317
We want to go the, let's say, linux route where this has the I don't know 90% penetration on servers.
00:16:57.232 --> 00:17:04.921
And then there's an incredible large ecosystem of players out there who whenever something is missing or is wrong there, he just change it.
00:17:04.921 --> 00:17:13.977
And sure there's commercial companies out there who can help you with keeping it stable, like Red Hat or Zuse or Ubuntu, canonical and all of those companies.
00:17:13.977 --> 00:17:17.500
They don't want to be one of those but just specialize on charging.
00:17:17.500 --> 00:17:23.235
People can go with us, but they can also go with a pure open source track which is also not only by us.
00:17:23.235 --> 00:17:29.432
But I think meanwhile more than 300 engineers actively contributed and it's maybe 15 from my folks.
00:17:29.432 --> 00:17:32.638
It's, I think, more than 50 organizations contributed.
00:17:32.638 --> 00:17:34.596
So this is not hobbyist stuff.
00:17:34.596 --> 00:17:41.776
This is people doing that for a living because their employee is paying them to contribute at Everest, at the open source project we do.
00:17:42.430 --> 00:17:45.794
So the charging station companies are your customer and you're selling to them.
00:17:45.794 --> 00:17:46.857
You're selling software to them.
00:17:46.857 --> 00:17:55.889
Did they have they already made the purchase decision that they want to be open source and compatible with everything else, or do you have to convince them to do that rather than sort of their own proprietary protocol?
00:17:56.250 --> 00:18:01.072
So if the protocols are anyway, in a proprietary, it's just the code which speaks that language.
00:18:01.072 --> 00:18:07.396
So in a way, we're in a situation where everyone agreed to speak English, but you have a lot of weird dialects out there.
00:18:07.396 --> 00:18:11.739
So let's say, the language is standardized, but your interpretation of it?
00:18:11.739 --> 00:18:19.703
I also studied for a while in the UK and really we had issues with understanding the people not from the greater London area.
00:18:19.703 --> 00:18:23.465
So in a way, this is how translation could fail.
00:18:23.465 --> 00:18:27.587
Yeah, everyone should speak the same language, but it's slightly different, so they fail.
00:18:27.587 --> 00:18:35.572
And we just want to harmonize that with not only sharing the documentation how to speak the language but, yeah, with the code doing it.
00:18:36.336 --> 00:18:37.659
And what is about hesitation?
00:18:37.659 --> 00:18:40.243
So this idea is new into this industry.
00:18:40.243 --> 00:18:45.313
It had to be there before for servers, for phones, for phones for databases or for drones.
00:18:45.313 --> 00:18:54.901
So you see it in waves, like first everyone is doing their own thing and then there's a later wave for open source, it's up the market and we created that wave here for charging.
00:18:54.901 --> 00:19:18.124
So before everyone just hadn't the idea that this could be a thing, but we really really pushed hard to make it happen and now you can see this avalanche or tsunami of change evolving, which we try to right, and we have a lot of, let's say, government support, like the US government, or the Joint Office of Energy and Transportation has some engineers working with us.
00:19:18.124 --> 00:19:22.520
We have support from, for example, the Californian government and officials.
00:19:23.089 --> 00:19:29.976
We replicated things something soon, something in a way similar with Azure Can't speak too much about that yet.
00:19:29.976 --> 00:19:33.696
And yeah, and then there's a lot of vendors.
00:19:33.696 --> 00:19:42.778
Many of them are still in stealth mode, just doing their thing with us and silently contributing, but a couple of them are already quite vocal that they think this is the future.
00:19:42.778 --> 00:19:44.776
And then the technology cycles are slow.
00:19:44.776 --> 00:19:54.357
Typically, you start migrating to this new software whenever you anyway do a big change, so launching new product lines, and this is, I would say, done every two years or so.
00:19:54.357 --> 00:19:57.118
So it takes some years to penetrate the markets.
00:19:57.549 --> 00:20:02.375
So some of this stuff you're doing with the company and some you're doing with this association where you're a board member.
00:20:02.375 --> 00:20:03.038
Is that right?
00:20:03.038 --> 00:20:08.442
Is that sort of more of the stakeholder environmental building work that you're doing with them?
00:20:08.929 --> 00:20:10.132
Yeah, in a way.
00:20:10.132 --> 00:20:14.622
So we are a bit way with different animals than a lot of the startups out there.
00:20:14.622 --> 00:20:16.674
Normally, as a startup, you sell your products.
00:20:16.674 --> 00:20:20.352
We first of all give all our products out there for free and try to earn money with that.
00:20:20.352 --> 00:20:21.974
I think that makes us special.
00:20:21.974 --> 00:20:25.981
Then normally you have to build a product, you have to build up a custom base and sell it.
00:20:25.981 --> 00:20:27.744
So we have to do one step further.
00:20:27.744 --> 00:20:33.750
We have to build an open source community and get that running and on top of that we can behave like a normal startup.
00:20:34.090 --> 00:20:48.019
But this extra thing is, I think, where you also meant up to Like, yes, I'm CEO of Pionix and I'm selling things, but then I have a second, third and fourth head where I'm head of the chair of the technical steering committee of the Everest project.
00:20:48.019 --> 00:20:53.122
I just got elected yesterday as one of the board members from the Linux Foundation Energy.
00:20:53.122 --> 00:20:58.106
I'm elected board member for the Open Charge Alliance, so one of those institutions doing those standards.
00:20:58.106 --> 00:21:04.860
So, yes, you have to be quite influential out there and help the industry to evolve and shape itself.
00:21:05.241 --> 00:21:12.379
Yeah, when you're building the market, you have to be bringing your competitors all under one tent as well, and trying to agree on some of the basic rules for the game.
00:21:12.769 --> 00:21:12.971
Yeah.
00:21:12.971 --> 00:21:16.699
So in a way, I think there's very little competition for what we do.
00:21:16.699 --> 00:21:23.538
I think there have been, a year ago, like five-ish competitors who purely made money with something like we do.
00:21:23.538 --> 00:21:30.173
A lot of others, anyway, have been hybrid and for them it was okay to give up on this piece and just join our forces.
00:21:30.173 --> 00:21:38.298
A couple of them already did that and from this five-ish we had a year ago, I would say we had now had to cross out two or three which stopped doing that.
00:21:38.298 --> 00:21:41.799
So we anyway see market consolidation Once again.
00:21:41.799 --> 00:21:46.923
We're selling things which have a very special value proposition.
00:21:46.923 --> 00:21:47.903
In a way it's commodity.
00:21:47.903 --> 00:21:55.967
On the other hand, it's super hard to make it right, yeah, and if we now go in there with, let's say, a free approach, it's giving everyone else a hard time.
00:21:55.967 --> 00:22:02.793
But the majority of the community I'm working with are, let's say, from chip makers, charging station makers, sanitization bodies.
00:22:02.793 --> 00:22:12.901
So 99% of the or 99.9% of the community out there doesn't see us as a threat, but see us as something welcoming, helping to get this right.
00:22:13.329 --> 00:22:14.778
What does the company look like right now?
00:22:14.778 --> 00:22:15.824
How many people are you?
00:22:15.824 --> 00:22:17.391
Do you have customers already?
00:22:17.391 --> 00:22:21.261
Maybe just paint a picture of what a day in the life of Pionix looks like.
00:22:21.589 --> 00:22:23.972
We started with this idea like four years ago.
00:22:23.972 --> 00:22:26.175
Three and a bit years ago we created the company.
00:22:26.175 --> 00:22:33.125
We raised so far almost 10 million, and we'll raise further money soon.
00:22:33.125 --> 00:22:39.512
So that's the classical VC case, because you have to be quick, you have to do quite some spending before you see returns.
00:22:39.512 --> 00:22:42.841
So we thought about bootstrapping this as we bootstrapped before.
00:22:42.841 --> 00:22:44.595
That wouldn't work with the strategy.
00:22:44.595 --> 00:22:46.780
We had to invest just too much to get this right.
00:22:47.809 --> 00:22:53.022
And, yeah, we have 34 people, but changing every day literally.
00:22:53.022 --> 00:22:55.956
So I think we have like four more open positions.
00:22:55.956 --> 00:22:57.420
Two-thirds of that is tech.
00:22:57.420 --> 00:23:04.503
I would say half of the tech is then committed to just do open source and get the open source community growing.
00:23:04.503 --> 00:23:08.734
Another third of the company is helping customers to get their product rights.
00:23:08.734 --> 00:23:15.786
I think there's about 10-ish products which are now underway or just recently launched, for example, from UK Podpoint.
00:23:15.786 --> 00:23:17.875
It's one of the bigger charging station manufacturers there.
00:23:17.875 --> 00:23:27.076
They announced last week that they now had to start a production and their product they now started to sell is based on Everest, or based on Pionic's Basecamp, to be precisely.
00:23:27.076 --> 00:23:42.451
Yeah, then even the one-third non-tech people half of them are doing community work, like me sitting committees, organizing conferences, working groups and, yeah, help the basically project management across companies and across continents.
00:23:43.092 --> 00:23:47.837
Is there anyone who's trying to prevent you from doing this kind of work, from doing the open sourcing?
00:23:47.837 --> 00:23:54.879
And I don't know this for a fact, but I'm thinking of an electric car company owned by an entrepreneur who's not extremely well known for collaboration.
00:23:56.370 --> 00:24:00.018
Okay, I couldn't go into that detail so I couldn't reveal our customer names.
00:24:00.018 --> 00:24:06.578
But let me put it this way we see quite the opposite from literally all the car makers out there.
00:24:06.578 --> 00:24:07.211
What we do here.
00:24:07.211 --> 00:24:10.240
With some of them we're working really commercially together.
00:24:10.240 --> 00:24:17.677
With some of them it's just more, let's say, technically collaboration, because they also have quite a bit of things to win At the end of the day.
00:24:17.677 --> 00:24:22.132
They want to have happy customers, so they want to have charging as easy as possible.
00:24:22.132 --> 00:24:45.096
We make it way easier for them to test this and to get this right and, as I said, we work with I think with all international car OEMs, together with engineering teams, on testing prototype cars, either officially on so-called testables, which is kind of a speed dating for cars and charging stations, or also behind the scenes, ongoing whenever there's something new.
00:24:45.096 --> 00:25:00.703
We have also quite cheap charging station emulators or one watt, megawatt charging systems, so hand-carriable charging station where you can try out all the software and see if your, let's say, early prototype car can handle it.
00:25:00.703 --> 00:25:05.320
And then the last piece of the puzzle is they want to shape the future infrastructure out there.
00:25:05.320 --> 00:25:07.437
So it's about, for them, also, innovation.
00:25:07.929 --> 00:25:15.137
How you typically do innovation, either you have a lot of market dominance and try to push something through, but also that is hard and quite money involving.
00:25:15.137 --> 00:25:27.759
Or you go to committees and convince everyone on the committee to make a change in the standard, then you're debating it for two or three years, then you're publishing it and then you try to hope that everyone implements your standard, and so this is a 10-year journey.
00:25:27.759 --> 00:25:38.174
Alternatively, you can just let a couple of engineers sit down, make a pull request to Everest, put, let's say, an alternative or add-on into it, and it's rolled out into the market in half a year.
00:25:38.174 --> 00:25:44.074
So we can accelerate innovation speed by 20-fold in cutting costs down for this dramatically.
00:25:44.074 --> 00:25:49.964
So also here I have some examples from car makers who are using that to push out innovation.
00:25:49.964 --> 00:25:52.937
And no, there's absolutely no opposition out there.
00:25:53.359 --> 00:25:53.721
I'm sorry.
00:25:53.721 --> 00:25:55.697
I want to hear more about what a testable is.
00:25:56.629 --> 00:25:58.236
There's actually two different testables.
00:25:58.236 --> 00:26:02.280
There's one testable for cars and charging station.
00:26:02.280 --> 00:26:06.477
They're called Charin testable and it's literally like speed dating.
00:26:06.477 --> 00:26:15.135
So every car charging station combination get an hour together to see if they can charge, if there's a spark in a way.
00:26:15.135 --> 00:26:17.522
And then you also have some similar events.
00:26:17.522 --> 00:26:21.653
They're called Plugfest, but charging station and cloud solution also try to make compatibility testing.
00:26:21.653 --> 00:26:23.359
So same approach 20 clouds, 20 charging stations or however many.
00:26:23.359 --> 00:26:24.384
And they also try to make compatibility testing.
00:26:24.384 --> 00:26:31.658
So same approach 20 clouds, 20 charting stations or however many, and they're getting an hour together and see if they can speak to each other and if things work out.
00:26:31.658 --> 00:26:41.163
And there I would say from each type for the like, a total of like 10 of this a year, globally distributed.
00:26:41.163 --> 00:26:44.038
We try to be as many as we can from them.
00:26:44.038 --> 00:26:46.850
We even hosted one of them ourselves in february.
00:26:46.850 --> 00:26:48.053
Sounds very romantic.
00:26:48.313 --> 00:26:50.939
You mentioned you're hiring uh for open positions.
00:26:50.939 --> 00:26:57.413
I'll definitely link to your linkedin and to your website in the show notes, but what else are you looking for to help you further your mission?
00:26:57.752 --> 00:27:09.217
we need more engineers we always need more engineers and spare like yes, we hire globally and we even now relocating someone from Australia over to Germany, but we also have people who are working remote.
00:27:09.217 --> 00:27:24.403
But I think particularly we're now looking for people who want to work hands-on on superchargers, wallboxes and whatever, and therefore also people who are interested to work in the beautiful southwestern area of Germany, next to cities like Heidelberg and Strasbourg.
00:27:24.403 --> 00:27:26.115
So that is one track.
00:27:26.115 --> 00:27:39.230
And then on the other track so far, and actually still going amazing customers are more or less flowing in, but with upcoming Series A and with all the growth we have to structure our sales and marketing.
00:27:39.230 --> 00:27:47.596
So also here we're hiring for some more marketing people, some more salespeople and even the chief revenue officer who orchestrates all of that.
00:27:47.596 --> 00:27:51.499
So, as you mentioned, we are physicists and natural scientists by heart.
00:27:51.499 --> 00:28:00.117
We can do a lot of things and, if I believe to my investors, we're not the sexiest marketeers out there, so maybe it's good to have some more help.
00:28:01.550 --> 00:28:02.816
Marco, it's fascinating stuff.
00:28:02.949 --> 00:28:07.736
Thank you so much for your time, yeah thanks a lot for having me and also please keep up the work.
00:28:07.736 --> 00:28:16.318
I think climate tech needs quite some attention and also, in a way, gets that also gets a lot of money, and I think together can do quite some change for good here.
00:28:16.549 --> 00:28:18.014
Yeah, we need to tell stories like yours.
00:28:18.014 --> 00:28:19.058
Thank you for that.
00:28:19.058 --> 00:28:23.672
Thanks for listening to another Climate Tech podcast.
00:28:23.672 --> 00:28:27.475
It would mean a lot if you would subscribe, rate and share this podcast.
00:28:27.475 --> 00:28:34.641
Get in touch anytime with tips and guest recommendations at hello at climatetechpodcom.
00:28:34.641 --> 00:28:37.984
Find me, ryan Grant Little, on LinkedIn.
00:28:37.984 --> 00:28:40.567
I'll be back with another episode next week.
00:28:40.567 --> 00:28:44.639
Bye for now.