Big Five Personality Test: Why Knowing Your Results Won't Change You (S3E15)

You take a personality assessment, read the results, and think yes, that's me. Six months later you land in the exact situation it warned you about and respond exactly the way it predicted, having changed nothing. Phil and Cole unpack the neuroscience behind that gap, and why a description of what you're like is a fundamentally different measurement from a map of what your brain is most alert to.

Visit https://brainwiseenterprises.com to learn more, get certified, take your Personal Threat Profile, and book personalized 1:1 coaching.

What you get in this conversation:

• The lexical hypothesis and the 1936 dictionary study that produced the Big Five
• Costa and McCrae's NEO Personality Inventory and the 60-item NEO-FFI
• What a personality trait actually measures, and why traits hold steady across situations
• Big Five predictive validity, from conscientiousness and job performance to neuroticism and stress
• Why a neurological sensitivity is a different kind of measurement from a trait
• The Personal Threat and Reward Profile's five drivers: protection, participation, prediction, purpose, and pleasure
• Four coaching cases where the Big Five alone misreads the client, including the introvert with a high participation driver and the low-agreeableness client with a hidden belonging need
• Why two people with identical neuroticism scores need completely different coaching conversations
• The double edge principle and the developmental calibration of threat sensitivity

Rate and review the show wherever you listen, then follow @mybrainwisecoach on every platform.

CHAPTERS

00:00 Why Personality Assessments Don't Change Behavior

01:21 Welcome To My BrainWise Coach

02:28 Lexical Hypothesis And Big Five Origins

04:33 What Personality Traits Actually Measure

06:15 Traits Versus Neurological Threat Sensitivity

07:45 The Personal Threat And Reward Profile

09:48 Four Cases Where Frameworks Diverge

15:16 What Each Framework Uniquely Gives You

17:48 Field Guide Summary And Close

REFERENCES

Allport, G. W., and Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-Names: A Psycho-Lexical Study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093360

Costa, P. T., Jr., and McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.

Barrick, M. R., and Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x

McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., and 78 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project (2005). Personality Profiles of Cultures: Aggregate Personality Traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 407-425. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.407

CONNECT

Website and Personal Threat Profile: https://brainwiseenterprises.com

Podcast: https://brainwiseenterprises.com/podcast

Everywhere else: @mybrainwisecoach

#Neuroscience #BigFive #PersonalityTest #Leadership #ExecutiveCoaching #MyBrainWiseCoach