WEBVTT
00:00:10.960 --> 00:00:18.079
Hi comrades, and welcome to CLASS, the podcast of Democratic Socialists of America's National Political Education Committee, or NPEC.
00:00:18.480 --> 00:00:23.199
My name is Michaela, and I'm the current chair of NPEC and a member of North New Jersey DSA.
00:00:23.679 --> 00:00:28.559
Before we dive in, a reminder that CLASS is available on all major podcast platforms.
00:00:28.800 --> 00:00:33.039
Please consider becoming a DSA member by following the link in the podcast description.
00:00:33.280 --> 00:00:40.159
You can also send us a message about the episode and sign up for Red Letter, NPEC's monthly newsletter using the provided links.
00:00:40.399 --> 00:00:56.880
And we want to call all DSA members' attention to the opening of applications to the National Political Education Commission, which is now an open body for any and all socialist educators, writers, researchers, and trainers to join us in shaping political education for the future.
00:00:57.119 --> 00:01:04.560
We're aiming for a big, diverse body, so we want to especially encourage non-men and comrades of color to join NPEC now to start in the fall.
00:01:04.799 --> 00:01:09.359
The application, with more details and contact info, is linked in the show notes.
00:01:10.480 --> 00:01:20.959
Something I noticed when I started to teach college in the 2010s was the use of the term classism or describing specific actions, events, books, or people as classist.
00:01:21.760 --> 00:01:34.959
For example, a course I commonly teach on science fiction and the good society that's popular the first years, we would be discussing a near future system of production where all human workers are minutely controlled by robots.
00:01:35.120 --> 00:01:41.120
And a student, often one really concerned with social justice, would call what was happening classist.
00:01:41.519 --> 00:01:50.000
Because it had to do with work and workers, the identification of the oppressed as classed was a discrete category like sexism or racism.
00:01:50.319 --> 00:02:14.319
To be fair, I think the use of the word was meant to express an injustice of a serious and fundamental kind, but I was surprised at how readily the phrase came to their tongues and was agreed to, that class antagonism was akin to the immoral mistreatment or discrimination of individuals or groups by others, not really about the necessary exploitation of a capitalist system, much less historical struggle or social transformation.
00:02:15.039 --> 00:02:28.000
I admit I'd only heard the word classist as invective hurled by social justice people on the internet before that, so I lazily assumed the word emerged from social media until I read the article we're discussing today by our three guests.
00:02:28.240 --> 00:02:48.000
It taught me that social justice concepts employed across civic education in middle and high school systematically de-emphasizes critical thinking about social relations, class in particular, and dehistoricizes them in favor of choice discourse, individual activism, and surface-level democratic rhetoric.
00:02:48.240 --> 00:02:53.120
The authors call this pedagogical project social justice nationalism.
00:02:53.680 --> 00:02:59.039
Kevin is an associate professor of black studies and education at Rutgers University, New Brunswick.
00:02:59.360 --> 00:03:07.280
Mia is an assistant professor of politics at Bard College, and Sudeep is a doctoral candidate in political science at Rutgers.
00:03:07.520 --> 00:03:20.319
And their article is called Making the Case for Political Education: a Critical Discourse of Undergraduate Civic Education in Social Studies Education and Political Science Readers, published in March in New Political Science.
00:03:20.560 --> 00:03:22.719
Welcome, Kevin, Mia, and Sudeep.
00:03:24.319 --> 00:03:25.439
Thank you for having us.
00:03:25.759 --> 00:03:26.800
Hi, thanks for having us.
00:03:26.960 --> 00:03:27.759
Happy to be here.
00:03:28.159 --> 00:03:30.159
Hi, thanks again for having us too.
00:03:30.479 --> 00:03:31.840
Yeah, well, thank you so much.
00:03:32.000 --> 00:03:36.319
I really appreciated um getting a chance to read this article and discuss it with you.
00:03:36.479 --> 00:04:06.000
Um, as I mentioned in my introduction, I'm also an educator and I have received students who have been um immersed really in like, you know, this sort of social studies or civic education uh curriculum from various, you know, places in all over the country and have noticed some patterns that I I found to be pretty interesting, but I didn't kind of put it together that this is all from this particular site or not all from, but like primarily like around this.
00:04:06.080 --> 00:04:08.240
And I found it to be incredibly enlightening.
00:04:08.319 --> 00:04:10.159
So really excited to talk to you.
00:04:10.240 --> 00:04:14.159
Um, but the first question is for uh first guests on the show.
00:04:14.240 --> 00:04:17.920
And we always ask, how and why did you become a socialist?
00:04:18.160 --> 00:04:22.720
And if you are part of DSA, how did you decide to join?
00:04:23.519 --> 00:04:23.920
Sure.
00:04:24.079 --> 00:04:33.839
Uh, so I grew up a liberal, although I didn't have the language of liberalism really to describe my own ideology.
00:04:34.480 --> 00:04:45.839
And I didn't become a socialist until pretty late in life when I was um in a PhD program at Yale University, and I got involved in unionizing my workplace.
00:04:46.240 --> 00:05:04.639
That experience um really helped me to develop a political analysis uh that centered the way that capitalism shapes the political economy of our society and of the university and the possibilities for democracy uh within the academy.
00:05:05.360 --> 00:05:13.920
My exposure to organizing through that experience also was really important for my development as a socialist.
00:05:14.240 --> 00:05:29.600
I had previously actually interned for Organizing for America, which was the Obama administration's attempt to develop a community organizing project, and I found it to be a very confusing and kind of disillusioning experience.
00:05:29.759 --> 00:05:44.000
And so then when I was exposed to a left-wing tradition of labor organizing, my theory of social change changed in a way that um that predisposed me to socialism.
00:05:44.399 --> 00:06:00.160
And then I joined DSA around the same time in 2016 with the big, you know, wave of millennials who joined DSA in response to the first Trump administration and also the Bernie campaign.
00:06:00.319 --> 00:06:05.279
Uh, and I um joined what was then the Central Connecticut chapter of DSA.
00:06:06.079 --> 00:06:18.000
And currently I live and work in the Hudson Valley in New York, and I am a member of the Mid-Hudson Valley chapter of DSA and a co-chair of our Palestine Liberation Working Group.
00:06:18.399 --> 00:06:18.800
Great.
00:06:19.040 --> 00:06:25.759
And also notably a former member and hopefully maybe future member of National Political Education Committee.
00:06:25.839 --> 00:06:28.639
Um, you know, one of the OGs, in fact.
00:06:28.800 --> 00:06:30.560
I think I I recruited you.
00:06:30.639 --> 00:06:32.720
Um I don't think I'm an OG, but you do.
00:06:33.040 --> 00:06:38.160
Well, you're not you're not from the first the first wave, but you're from like the first couple of terms.
00:06:38.319 --> 00:06:42.000
Um left your imprint for sure.
00:06:42.160 --> 00:06:43.439
People miss you there.
00:06:43.680 --> 00:06:49.439
Um, Sideep, you wanna uh give your round?
00:06:49.920 --> 00:06:50.319
Sure.
00:06:50.480 --> 00:06:59.680
Um I had uh a similar sort of trajectory in terms of Obama, well, in terms of the Obama years being very disappointing.
00:06:59.759 --> 00:07:04.399
So that sort of accelerated my need for an alternative.
00:07:04.560 --> 00:07:08.480
But I did grow up in a peak Leninist family, actually.
00:07:08.639 --> 00:07:12.079
So my family comes from uh West Bengal, India.
00:07:12.240 --> 00:07:23.360
They've had, at least at that point when they arrived in the United States, they were still uh rule ruling sounds really weird, but they had been winning elections consecutively for some decades.
00:07:23.439 --> 00:07:26.000
It's the CPIM, the Communist Party of India, Marxists.
00:07:26.079 --> 00:07:32.399
There's a there's a Communist Party of India uh that was uh older, but this one split off uh in the 50s.
00:07:32.480 --> 00:07:34.720
So that became the ruling party.
00:07:34.879 --> 00:07:44.399
Uh it still exists in West Bengal, it's been very suppressed, actually, um, and had been also ruling Kerala, India, which is in the South.
00:07:44.480 --> 00:07:46.000
But my family comes from that background.
00:07:46.160 --> 00:07:51.040
So growing up, I always had some uh funny interactions with my parents about that stuff.
00:07:51.199 --> 00:08:02.079
So for instance, if my dad got, I don't I think like instances where I'd bring home homework about uh League of Nations or self-determination, he would look at it and say, uh Lenin said that or something.
00:08:02.240 --> 00:08:04.240
So I had some of that in my background.
00:08:04.399 --> 00:08:07.600
Um but they're also very liberal to Mier's point.
00:08:07.680 --> 00:08:11.759
I grew up technically between the two of those kind of worlds, it's kind of blurred the lines.
00:08:11.920 --> 00:08:16.160
Um, but I had that understanding, so I didn't fear communism.
00:08:16.319 --> 00:08:22.959
Um, but what really got me into DSA was not just 2016, but 2018 when AOC ran.
00:08:23.360 --> 00:08:26.079
Um, because I was a little bit hesitant at first.
00:08:26.240 --> 00:08:36.799
Uh I didn't know a lot about DSA, and obviously at that time DSA had finally grown from a lot of you know smaller chapters to now what it is now with tens of thousands of members.
00:08:37.200 --> 00:08:40.080
107,000, I think, is the last account.
00:08:40.399 --> 00:08:49.519
Yeah, so it's grown really exponentially, which brings a lot of like good things and also some issues that we have to sort of deal with, but that also is part of like how fast it's grown, which is a good thing.
00:08:49.679 --> 00:08:54.240
Um, but uh I joined in 2018 around that time because of AOC.
00:08:54.399 --> 00:08:56.559
Obviously, now I have a lot of issues with her.
00:08:56.720 --> 00:08:58.879
Um, but I've still remained a DSA member.
00:08:58.960 --> 00:09:02.240
I was co-chair of the Central Jersey chapter for a few years.
00:09:02.399 --> 00:09:04.879
Uh I was running the poly ed at that same time.
00:09:05.120 --> 00:09:06.480
I was co-chair of that.
00:09:07.039 --> 00:09:08.799
I was the leader of that actually.
00:09:08.960 --> 00:09:11.279
Uh a lot of people dripped in and out.
00:09:11.440 --> 00:09:14.399
Um, and then I'm currently a Philly DSA member.
00:09:14.480 --> 00:09:18.639
I'm part of the Red Star caucus, and I don't know why my Jersey accent came out for that.
00:09:18.720 --> 00:09:24.879
And also I'm also uh I'm also um part of the DSA editorial board.
00:09:25.039 --> 00:09:27.759
So I'm the managing editor of Socialist Forum right now.
00:09:27.840 --> 00:09:31.679
It's been great, it's been fun, and I'm still happy to be part of this org.
00:09:32.000 --> 00:09:32.720
That's awesome.
00:09:32.879 --> 00:09:33.279
Yeah.
00:09:33.440 --> 00:09:34.639
Um, Kevin.
00:09:35.120 --> 00:09:37.120
Hey, so I'm the outlier here.
00:09:37.279 --> 00:09:39.440
Uh I am not a DSA member.
00:09:39.759 --> 00:09:43.840
You are a fellow traveler, and we love our fellow travelers, don't we, folks?
00:09:45.200 --> 00:09:47.200
Um, thank you.
00:09:47.440 --> 00:09:54.000
Uh so uh I I grew up uh similarly like in a in a household that was liberal.
00:09:54.080 --> 00:10:01.200
I wouldn't have used that word either to describe like my parents' uh kind of like political orientation.
00:10:01.440 --> 00:10:13.919
Uh though my parents were very critical of white folks and like you know, experienced all kinds of like problems on on the job and you know, last uh people hired, first fired.
00:10:14.080 --> 00:10:20.639
Uh, you know, there was a a a kind of like a discourse that was like in my house.
00:10:20.720 --> 00:10:30.399
It was very clearly like pointing out like how uh how precarious uh work uh would be for my uh for uh black folks.
00:10:30.480 --> 00:10:51.440
And my my parents wanted to instill in us in a lot of ways uh like the values of like uh hard work and like you know uh you know being twice working twice as hard uh to be you know a couple of steps behind just because we knew uh or they knew that you know racism would ultimately meet us uh when we got to the labor market.
00:10:52.240 --> 00:11:06.399
Um and so that was that was kind of like a a part of like how I grew up that like I guess like uh provided an entryway uh for me to move beyond like a liberal sort of understanding of politics.
00:11:06.639 --> 00:11:10.320
It wasn't really until I got to my PhD program.
00:11:10.480 --> 00:11:11.919
Um it's really interesting, Mia.
00:11:12.240 --> 00:11:14.240
You said that too, that my PhD program.
00:11:14.480 --> 00:11:18.399
And it's unfortunate, like when you're to like I mean, I'm I was trained in a PhD program.
00:11:18.559 --> 00:11:24.000
I'm actually a faculty in the same program that I got uh my PhD in.
00:11:24.240 --> 00:11:49.039
Um and uh, you know, there is uh absolutely um in education and as a field, um an embrace of critical politics, there's a lot of uh uh discourse around social change and education as a vehicle for social change, but a lot of it is rooted in uh kind of like postmodern um framework.
00:11:49.279 --> 00:11:51.440
Um, and I wasn't aware of that.
00:11:51.519 --> 00:12:08.639
And so, like, as I'm like quote unquote, you know, becoming more radical, uh there are people who were actual Marxists who were uh like kind of like criticizing my framework, like who were like really like pushing back on like the way I was uh talking about issues.
00:12:08.799 --> 00:12:22.480
Um I had a really good friend in uh not in my program, but was but they were also getting a PhD at the time who was organizing with the union and who um you know just had like a stronger uh foundation um in her politics.
00:12:22.639 --> 00:12:32.960
Uh she really became like instrumental in helping me to see past like some of the postmodern ways in which like I was thinking about the world.
00:12:33.200 --> 00:12:43.759
Um and uh it set me uh on a course to reading and you know, uh want to say it was probably like the most like radicalizing thing I read at that point.
00:12:44.000 --> 00:12:48.399
Um uh Black Awakening in Capitalist America by Robert Allen.
00:12:48.639 --> 00:13:07.759
Um and that was uh a pivotal turning point for me, like helped really expose liberalism for what it is, um, the limitations of nationalism, uh nationalism that doesn't include uh uh a sort of uh critical um framework uh for getting at capitalism.
00:13:07.919 --> 00:13:12.000
And then I'm also uh kind of like started studying the Panthers, right?
00:13:12.080 --> 00:13:19.120
And I think that that you know gave me like I guess kind of like a basic framework for moving beyond liberalism at that point.
00:13:19.679 --> 00:13:20.000
Yeah.
00:13:20.240 --> 00:13:31.039
So that's how you kind of became aware, like it was kind of like a a class consciousness explosion in a way, of like just being like, this is how everything came together.
00:13:31.279 --> 00:13:34.240
So you come by you come by this article really honestly then.
00:13:34.960 --> 00:13:36.399
Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
00:13:36.559 --> 00:13:37.279
Yeah, absolutely.
00:13:37.360 --> 00:13:39.440
And I and I'm not even sure if I would say an explosion.
00:13:39.519 --> 00:13:43.440
I kind of it was kind of like a steady creep toward like radicalism.
00:13:43.600 --> 00:14:07.840
Um, and I mean, even you know, even like when once you've been like so deeply uh like trained and socialized in like liberal postmodern like uh frameworks, it's hard to uh sort of catch your set, like to catch, you know, where like certain um ideas are coming from uh when you uh sort of embrace uh like a particular view of the world.
00:14:07.919 --> 00:14:10.720
And so like, you know, I guess maybe that's not even the way to put it.
00:14:10.799 --> 00:14:25.759
Like I think you I started to realize that some of the ideas that I uh was holding about my my own um life in politics were were really inadequate for explaining like what was happening um um to me.
00:14:26.000 --> 00:14:32.399
Um and there was a you know a way that like as a graduate student, like many of us are like really poor.
00:14:32.559 --> 00:14:49.440
Um and that wasn't, you know, and if you just have a race framework, right, to to think about like being, you know, like your feelings of alienation as a grad student, it it often it it misses uh what's really fundamentally a sort of class exploitation experience.
00:14:49.759 --> 00:15:07.600
Um and I think we we were able to uh some of us I think who were um being moved toward the left were able to uh kind of reach for Marxism and and find some um find some clarity in it to help understand our experience.
00:15:07.759 --> 00:15:08.000
Yeah.
00:15:08.320 --> 00:15:08.559
Yeah.
00:15:08.639 --> 00:15:13.679
I mean the records has also like a well-established uh graduate student union.
00:15:13.840 --> 00:15:26.240
And um, like Mia, I also became socialist or an organized socialist through union organizing when I was organizing at Cornell um and like put together that exploitation piece.
00:15:26.399 --> 00:15:35.759
Um, you know, while the university was trying to tell us that we were privileged, you know, we, you know, had this up these opportunities to learn, blah, blah, blah.
00:15:36.080 --> 00:15:39.919
We realized that our labor was actually what was keeping the university going.
00:15:40.080 --> 00:15:46.399
And if we were to stop, then it would all be game over for, you know, what they were trying to do.
00:15:46.559 --> 00:16:04.080
It really um helped me put together the theory and the practice praxis, as they say, but also helped me realize kind of my own missteps before with the theory that I had just been, you know, sort of given as true.
00:16:04.240 --> 00:16:08.559
For example, Foucault, you can't get outside of power, it's all diffuse, blah, blah, blah.
00:16:08.879 --> 00:16:11.919
It helps, you know, it's like, you know, losing yourself in that.
00:16:12.080 --> 00:16:20.240
To be honest with you, there's still some things about Foucault we can use, but you kind of have to, I think, have a political analysis.
00:16:20.480 --> 00:16:34.559
And, you know, we're all Marxists here to realize what it is you can take or leave and not just um, you know, take what your advisor tells you as sacrosanct or something, um, or what your favorite teacher tells you.
00:16:34.720 --> 00:16:46.240
And I think that's really kind of maybe a meta-level of this article because we're talking specifically about how people are educated in their formative years, but we're lifelong learners, right?
00:16:46.399 --> 00:17:13.680
Like, you know, we're always learning and developing our political analyses and how we kind of receive this um sort of normative framework of, you know, either capitalism is inevitable or, you know, individuals have uh it in their agency specifically to kind of shape social change the way that they feel like without any um, you know, kind of collective action, I think is like really key here.
00:17:13.839 --> 00:17:20.000
But I know that um we want to get into the sort of the method and like the research.
00:17:20.079 --> 00:17:41.440
It sounds like Kevin, you also like as a, you know, I think black studies and education, very sort of like, you know, not narrow, but like a sort of like um heavily uh you know historicized section of you know, sort of this whole endeavor of like pedagogy and and education.
00:17:41.599 --> 00:17:45.200
Can you talk a little bit more about the work that you do in this?
00:17:45.359 --> 00:17:50.400
Like maybe expand a little bit, and then we'll ask Mia and Sudeep as well about their work areas.
00:17:51.200 --> 00:17:53.039
Yeah, you yeah, you mean like my my research?
00:17:53.519 --> 00:17:54.640
Yeah, your research, exactly.
00:17:54.960 --> 00:17:55.279
Yeah.
00:17:55.519 --> 00:17:56.400
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:17:56.559 --> 00:18:05.920
I mean, so uh, you know, this is it's funny because I just had to submit my materials for Tang in and give me a chance to kind of like think about what I have been doing up until this point.
00:18:06.000 --> 00:18:11.839
Um, because I don't think it was absolutely clear to me if I were to say, like, well, you know, this is the kind of you know work that I do.
00:18:12.000 --> 00:18:21.279
Uh, but in in general, like I'm I am studying black education and political ideology uh through the lens of political economy.
00:18:21.440 --> 00:18:52.319
Um, and I am uh uh by and large, like looking at like black schools and communities as places where politics are happening and where there are hidden dimensions of political economy that are sort of shaping um what's happening in those places, um, and uh sort of surfacing the tensions that come up there, uh, even when they oftentimes operate under really opaque frameworks that don't give uh uh don't bring political economy into view, right?
00:18:52.480 --> 00:19:11.279
And so uh that my my work is largely about kind of exposing those hidden dimensions of political economy and then really uh providing an alternative framework to make politics really front and center um in issues that are happening that like appear relatively apolitical in schools and communities.
00:19:12.480 --> 00:19:13.119
Yeah.
00:19:15.680 --> 00:19:33.759
Uh yeah, so in poli sci, most of my focus is on uh seeking out the potentialities and at least growing the the body of research in poli sci having to do with the political alignment or misalignment between people of color.
00:19:34.000 --> 00:19:39.200
So in focal science there is a growing amount of research on this topic, but still not enough.
00:19:39.359 --> 00:19:51.440
So so typically, even to the day, uh and Mie can speak to this a little bit too, because I think she's seen this where um a lot of the research still does this like white or non-white binary when it comes to discussing politics.
00:19:51.519 --> 00:20:02.240
And sometimes white, black, or white, Latino, usually Asian Americans are slumped in as other, uh, along with you know people who are mixed race or biracial, which doesn't make sense because it's very different categories.
00:20:02.480 --> 00:20:22.000
But uh so my dissertation, for example, is a qualitative in-depth relies on qualitative in-depth interviews of people in and around Jersey City, because Jersey City is a very quote unquote majority minority area, even though I hate that term, but it's essentially the US is returning to its pre-colonial roots finally.
00:20:22.240 --> 00:20:26.880
Um I live in Union City, which is 80% Latino.
00:20:27.200 --> 00:20:27.519
Right.
00:20:27.680 --> 00:20:28.160
Exactly.
00:20:28.480 --> 00:20:37.440
I live in I live in a uh the house was owned by an Italian American, so we like to say that we're actually doing reverse gentrification by moving into an Italian house.
00:20:38.000 --> 00:20:38.640
That is really fun.
00:20:38.960 --> 00:20:44.079
I mean, yeah, I mean, some of them move into the other suburbs, I guess, but uh that's pretty funny.
00:20:44.160 --> 00:20:48.720
Yeah, Union is also very Cuban American, but yeah, that whole region is very interesting to me.
00:20:48.880 --> 00:20:52.079
I grew up in Jersey, I grew up in Queens, that's where I'm born and raised.
00:20:52.240 --> 00:20:56.640
Uh, but I grew up in central Jersey, so I've always been interested in these questions for a lot of reasons.
00:20:56.799 --> 00:21:01.039
One of which is also how do we create these coalitions we need for power?
00:21:01.200 --> 00:21:04.400
And a lot of those discussions need to happen on the quote unquote non-white side.
00:21:04.480 --> 00:21:10.880
So again, in political science, there's a sort of tendency to think, well, there's racism, so these groups will just manifest.
00:21:11.119 --> 00:21:30.559
But I obviously think there's a lot more nuance there, especially on the ground level, when it comes to places like Jersey City, where you have a multitude of Democrats, and you might have some instances of people of color having a multitude of options to go with their real heart, as opposed to the national question, which is usually like pitting a Democrat who's awful against someone who's a fascist like Trump.
00:21:30.640 --> 00:21:35.920
So therefore you see these kind of like people of color sliding one way versus the other sometimes.
00:21:36.160 --> 00:21:48.480
Um but yeah, the question that we're asking in this uh project that also drew me to this project, and Kevin was the one to reach out to me, and then we also reached out to Mie about it, has a lot to do with, again, my own research.
00:21:48.640 --> 00:21:59.839
Because even though I'm attacking this question of coalition building, it's through the perspective of of course, I'm looking for data, but I'm also through the perspective of someone like Claudia Jones, who was a Marxist Lannist.
00:22:00.720 --> 00:22:07.279
Because again, as you kind of referenced in Foucault, there's also another issue where there's a huge emphasis on difference.
00:22:07.759 --> 00:22:12.319
If there's any difference, it gets emphasized to suggest there's no universal language.
00:22:12.880 --> 00:22:21.920
So my project is not necessarily to be totally against that because it I have to find the data, but I am finding the data with my interviews already being done and I'm writing it.
00:22:22.799 --> 00:22:31.519
That a political economy needs to be part of our reasoning as to like what to expect that African Americans, Asians, and Latinos would talk about.
00:22:31.680 --> 00:22:36.880
Because many of them in my research said housing, even if on other issues they differ, right?
00:22:36.960 --> 00:22:41.839
So again, the political economy stuff, like like Kevin said magnificently, is part of that lens.
00:22:41.920 --> 00:22:48.559
And that was really missing, to be honest with you, in how I was politically taught in academia.
00:22:48.960 --> 00:22:50.400
Not so much with my family.
00:22:50.559 --> 00:22:56.799
My family, my dad would always mention working class stuff, but like Kevin, also racism plays a big role.
00:22:56.880 --> 00:23:00.720
So there's another interesting element of why I was a little bit hesitant with DSA at first.
00:23:01.039 --> 00:23:03.440
But in academia, I was taught opposite.
00:23:03.599 --> 00:23:11.119
I was actually taught to emphasize difference to a to a certain extreme degree and to suggest that there is no universal language.
00:23:15.680 --> 00:23:38.240
So I think listening to everyone talk about their journeys to socialism, I was reflecting on the fact that I think for all of us, um we were all academics, and there was some experience of like a contradiction between the way the academic frameworks that we were given to think about politics and our actual experiences of politics.
00:23:38.319 --> 00:23:51.920
Um that was that very much that contradiction is really at the heart of my research because that experience of trying to unionize my workplace in grad school completely changed my research trajectory.
00:23:52.079 --> 00:24:10.640
I I totally rewrote my perspective, my dissertation perspective in my third year to a, to a, from like a history of political thought project to a project that's really about, I would say I'm new to this language, I'm trying it out, but kind of like the phenomenology of political of left political organizing.
00:24:10.880 --> 00:24:34.880
Um, and I think part of what I experienced as a grad student was that um many of I was organizing democratic theorists, like people who professionally think about democracy, and many of them felt that the practices of organizing that we were engaged with in our union were intrinsically undemocratic because they involved trying to change people, right?
00:24:35.039 --> 00:24:40.319
Like trying to change people's minds and doing so by trying to engage them in kind of a collective.
00:24:40.480 --> 00:24:45.279
Um, and there were certainly undemocratic aspects of the union that I was a part of.
00:24:45.440 --> 00:24:53.680
Um, but that that that kind of experience really led me to think about like, well, what is the concept of democracy that my field is premised on?
00:24:53.759 --> 00:25:00.480
And why is there actually like nothing about organizing in this whole um in this whole discipline?
00:25:00.640 --> 00:25:12.240
Um, and so then I wrote a dissertation that is about, well, now it's become a book that's really about um the relationship between self-emancipation and organizing.
00:25:12.720 --> 00:25:35.519
Um and, you know, often we think about we use words like self-emancipation or self-self-organization, self-activity to invoke a kind of like um spontaneous process of like unleashing an oppressed self that is that is like sort of bounded and stable and um and um not in flux.
00:25:35.759 --> 00:25:51.119
Um but in fact, the process of organizing, if we take seriously the idea that we are shaped as political subjects by our circumstances, right, including our participation in oppressive institutions, um, has to involve changing ourselves, right?
00:25:51.279 --> 00:25:56.720
We have to change as, you know, into new political subjects from within oppressive conditions.
00:25:56.880 --> 00:26:26.880
Um, and so I'm kind of trying to think of that as like a fundamental antinomy or kind of paradox of organizing, and then um, and then try to, I try to argue that actually many of the most intractable and kind of explosive controversies in left political organizing, including debates about leadership, like whether the organizer is a leader or a facilitator, debates about like manipulation, what distinguishes organizing from manipulation.
00:26:27.039 --> 00:26:32.160
Um, these are these kind of stem from this underlying antinomy of self-emancipation.
00:26:32.319 --> 00:26:36.559
Um, and I and I think about organizers as political theorists.
00:26:36.799 --> 00:26:57.039
And then my book really tries to engage the way that canonical um American 20th and 21st century organizers have encountered um these problems and controversies and the resolutions that they've um articulated through their practice.
00:26:57.839 --> 00:27:00.559
Well, I would like to talk more about that for sure.
00:27:00.720 --> 00:27:17.920
Because it sounds um, it sounds like, I mean, we already know that we've been through, you know, maybe a little bit of a similar journey, having gone through that thing that we went through, which was, you know, trying to organize our colleagues, many of whom um didn't want to have their minds changed, in fact.
00:27:18.000 --> 00:27:20.079
Um, but we were trying to win a union.
00:27:20.319 --> 00:27:33.359
I guess um, you know, what I'm hearing also in common, and and Mia, you sort of touched on this, I think, a little at the beginning of what you were saying, is that everyone is engaging in a critique of their fields, um, you know, throughout like your research.
00:27:33.680 --> 00:27:49.519
And what this article does is take that critique of the field, both education and political science, and kind of um create a sort of, I would call it a hermeneutic, um, because you're using like sort of this keyword conception.
00:27:49.599 --> 00:27:55.279
I don't know if your fields have a different term for that, but that's the the word that kind of came to mind.
00:27:55.440 --> 00:27:59.279
But it also is a a collective project you guys wrote together.
00:27:59.440 --> 00:28:02.559
So um maybe you could talk a little bit.
00:28:02.640 --> 00:28:07.279
Um you talked about it a second ago, Sudeep, about how you sort of got interested in it.
00:28:07.359 --> 00:28:11.359
It was kind of a hook with like very related to like what you were already looking at.
00:28:11.680 --> 00:28:15.200
But how did the article start and how did you decide to write it together?
00:28:15.359 --> 00:28:19.440
Like what were your experiences as well with your own teaching?
00:28:19.599 --> 00:28:25.839
Maybe if you've taught, I mean, I know Mia, you teach because you teach at BARD, and there's a lot of teaching going on at BARD.
00:28:26.000 --> 00:28:27.920
Um, and then you know, Kevin, you're a professor.
00:28:28.000 --> 00:28:35.200
I don't know, Sue Deep, if you've um had a chance to teach undergraduates and if there's any resonance there, but also want to talk about your methods.
00:28:35.279 --> 00:28:41.759
So maybe first short, like just how did you how did you all meet each other and how did you decide to write this?
00:28:41.920 --> 00:28:53.519
And then maybe like what were any experiences you've had that made you think, oh, this needs to be like I've noticed this, or maybe if you didn't notice it, you like heard anecdotally or something.
00:28:53.839 --> 00:28:54.640
Mia, go ahead.
00:28:54.720 --> 00:28:55.920
You can start this one.
00:28:56.960 --> 00:28:57.279
Sure.
00:28:57.359 --> 00:29:06.240
Well, Kevin and I met through the podcast the dig during the pandemic, um, because Dan Denver, the host of the podcast.
00:29:06.480 --> 00:29:14.799
Um and a friend, um, friend and comrade uh of mine um uh mentioned in the past.
00:29:15.119 --> 00:29:20.000
I think he mentioned something I had said actually, I think, about this like paradoxical connectivity.
00:29:20.480 --> 00:29:26.400
Um and um on an episode, and then Kevin, I think, wrote again with like connecting the end.
00:29:26.559 --> 00:29:31.200
And then we had some great conversations, we assume, during the pandemic about our research.
00:29:31.279 --> 00:29:35.680
And then I think Kevin and Sudeep really developed the idea for this article.
00:29:35.839 --> 00:30:09.440
Um, and then Rob invited me in, and I was really excited to participate in research with both of them, first of all, because I really admired their work, um, and also because um my own experience in political sciences that they alluded to had really led me to a critique of specifically the concept of democracy that I think is really hegemonic, both in uh democratic theory scholarship, but also in the teaching of political science and of civic education in particular.
00:30:10.799 --> 00:30:14.160
Yeah, anything to add to that for either of you guys?
00:30:15.279 --> 00:30:26.799
Yeah, I'll just say quickly because I it meeting Mia was was absolutely the way she described that was uh really important for me at that moment because I was working on my book.
00:30:26.960 --> 00:30:32.319
Well, I was working on an edited volume and working on my sole author book at that time.
00:30:32.480 --> 00:30:39.359
Um, and both of them sort of raised questions that align with the like kind of like fundamental premise of this article.
00:30:39.519 --> 00:30:47.519
Um, but uh Mia had uh this really dope article in um uh what is what is the uh journal, Mia?
00:30:48.160 --> 00:30:49.440
The Ella Baker one.
00:30:49.759 --> 00:30:50.240
Yeah, yeah.
00:30:50.480 --> 00:30:51.680
Um American Political Science.
00:30:52.160 --> 00:31:00.720
American Political Science, yeah, which has actually become like a really um anchoring piece in um my book in its uh second chapter.
00:31:00.960 --> 00:31:14.559
But uh I think I had for a while been disillusioned with like the frameworks uh that I was trained, like I mentioned before, that I was trained uh with and I was trained by folks who were social studies educators.
00:31:14.720 --> 00:31:23.440
Um and so there was a part of me, especially like during the years while I was in grad school, Michael Brown, you know, murder.
00:31:23.599 --> 00:31:53.680
There's you know, uh all kinds of like discourse happening um around Black Lives Matter, uh had encounters with um, you know, several texts, uh Keonga Taylor's uh Black Lives Matter, the Black Liberation, uh, that were really helping me to develop a critique of, I think, some of the most common and um accessible um ways of sort of understanding that moment um and uh the kind of like liberal nationalist politics that were developing.
00:31:53.839 --> 00:32:04.319
Uh and you know, it's also the like very uh, you know, classic big big L liberal stuff that was coming up in MP on on NPR that was uh, you know, critiquing rioting, right?
00:32:04.400 --> 00:32:08.319
Like as a uh, you know, black folks rioting in in Ferguson and things like that.
00:32:08.480 --> 00:32:29.440
Um and so those things have sort of been the impetus for my book, uh the uh edited uh collection, uh The Promise of Youth, Youth Anti-Citizenship, you know, kind of like you know, social studies uh has uh given us, or education rather has given us some ways to think about citizenship and good citizenship that fundamentally misalign with some of the things that I'm seeing in the street right now.
00:32:29.599 --> 00:32:32.640
Um and people are actually, you know, destroying property.
00:32:32.799 --> 00:32:45.599
Uh and that's a and and and you know the things that I'm hearing on the radio and I'm and I'm in the ways that people are talking about it in the uh halls of academia um are saying, like, well, this is backwards and this doesn't make any sense, this is ridiculous.
00:32:46.400 --> 00:32:48.000
But I have a different perspective.
00:32:48.160 --> 00:32:58.160
Um and then I was also participating in um, so my dissertation project uh was uh something called youth participatory.
00:32:58.319 --> 00:33:01.039
I was doing something called youth participatory action research.
00:33:01.599 --> 00:33:06.079
Uh and par is I'm sure you're familiar with participatory action research.
00:33:06.160 --> 00:33:16.559
Uh PAR with youth is sort of grounded in uh understanding of frere that prioritizes uh student-centered learning.
00:33:17.039 --> 00:33:27.680
Um and uh what is often missed, however, is uh the uh the importance of political education um in that work.
00:33:28.000 --> 00:33:42.160
Um and what what becomes sort of central is the teacher's posture of like, you know, stepping to the back, being a peer uh in the classroom, and like uh sort of kind of like dis dismantling the hierarchy in the classroom.
00:33:42.319 --> 00:34:01.440
And Mia and I had kind of bonded over this uh, you know, some of the challenges I was having with this framework and like talking about like, you know, the the kind of like uh the kind of like uh fear of indoctrination that I think undergirds like the issue, like excuse me, the way that they frame um my part.
00:34:02.079 --> 00:34:27.119
Um and so like all at the confluence of all of these like projects and sort of like the ways I'm thinking, I'm sort of like understanding like what's happening in the world and like you know, the the the limitations of the frameworks that I had been given, all of that is like really producing like in me like the need for more like uh I I wanted like a a conceptual boost and an empirical boost to kind of support the argument that I was making.
00:34:27.360 --> 00:34:34.000
Um and uh you know that this this project became a vehicle to do that.
00:34:34.159 --> 00:34:54.480
And so my my uh you know, my friend, uh my good friend Martina uh introduced me to Sudeep, um, who was uh already like someone who I had uh been aware of uh reading some of his work in press, uh, but uh had not been connected to him formally.
00:34:54.719 --> 00:35:24.639
And uh Sudeep and I just hit it off and we started thinking about like the thing that I was raising um that I you know just mentioned, and uh started to get we started to get the work on like what was like the the I kind of like the the sort of basic framework for this uh for this project and uh reached a point in uh in the writing and thought like, hey, like this, you know, I I was thinking, you know, Mia, uh who you know, I was building this relationship with would be a great addition to this.
00:35:24.800 --> 00:35:34.079
Um and so she uh you know we reached out to her and she was super amenable and like we just really became like really cl we we got really close really quick.
00:35:34.239 --> 00:35:39.360
Uh we we ended up uh you know just really uh loving doing this work.
00:35:39.519 --> 00:35:42.559
Um but yeah, I think I think that's that's my version of the story.
00:35:42.719 --> 00:35:43.360
I don't know if I have to do that.
00:35:43.519 --> 00:35:48.400
CDP, you've been interpolated, so why don't you go ahead and uh finish us out here and then we'll talk.
00:35:48.480 --> 00:36:06.239
I'd love to hear also more about your thoughts about the method you used, um, you know, because it was explained in the article as a kind of compilation, but you also met each other via like sort of these like more social and organizing, you know, circles, even though, you know, are podcasts organizing?
00:36:06.400 --> 00:36:07.920
I don't know, maybe the jury's out on that.
00:36:08.079 --> 00:36:10.239
But nonetheless, um, yeah, but Sudeep, go ahead.
00:36:10.320 --> 00:36:12.960
And then if you want to talk about method, I'd love to hear about that.
00:36:13.280 --> 00:36:13.519
Yeah.
00:36:13.679 --> 00:36:16.800
So um, so I've I've written, so I do teach.
00:36:16.880 --> 00:36:19.360
I've been teaching, like I'm wrapping up my disc dissertations.
00:36:19.519 --> 00:36:28.559
I've been teaching a lot of classes around uh US Empire, uh Marxist uh theory, race and ethnicity, and Asian American history and politics.
00:36:28.719 --> 00:36:37.119
So, and those are important to me because the way I would teach it has changed a little bit in terms of how to formulate what I think students are missing from other classes around these subjects.
00:36:37.360 --> 00:36:45.440
Uh, there is sometimes a tendency or a conversation around race, gender, sexuality, however meaningful, that is still quite restrictive.
00:36:45.599 --> 00:36:58.639
Um, for instance, you're not going to hear a lot about people like Claudia Jones, who are quite instructive in terms of our history as people of color, who are quite radical, and she was a Marxist-Leninist from the 40s and 50s, and then she was deported to the UK.
00:36:59.119 --> 00:37:13.760
Uh, fun fact, she was not deported back to the Caribbean because they feared if she returned to uh, I think Trinidad, even though she was there as a little girl, she would actually be very, very she would crew she would be amazing at organizing people against the British.
00:37:13.840 --> 00:37:15.360
So they actually feared her that much.
00:37:15.440 --> 00:37:22.480
So they took her to uh the UK, where the British Communist Party was was really uh racist and sexist towards her.
00:37:22.559 --> 00:37:29.599
Um and she made uh Carnival, which is the biggest, second biggest carnival in the entire world, second to what happens in the Caribbean.
00:37:29.679 --> 00:37:30.719
So she's really dope.
00:37:30.960 --> 00:37:42.079
But um, but yeah, just really quickly, uh, I do a lot of also um public-facing work, which also does not get as this is also interesting, it doesn't get as respected in the fields, to be honest.
00:37:42.239 --> 00:37:49.199
Uh uh being able to write public-facing work is usually not seen as work, I have to be honest with you.
00:37:49.280 --> 00:37:51.760
So when Kevin reached out to me, it was quite validating.
00:37:51.920 --> 00:37:53.840
Um, so I really appreciate him doing that.
00:37:54.000 --> 00:37:56.559
Uh he just said, uh, dude, I like your work.
00:37:56.639 --> 00:37:58.159
Uh it was more formal than that.
00:37:58.239 --> 00:38:00.400
Uh but uh and I was like, oh shit.
00:38:00.480 --> 00:38:02.400
Like we already knew each other on Facebook.
00:38:02.559 --> 00:38:06.719
I knew of him through Ulsa Martina, and uh it was great.
00:38:06.880 --> 00:38:07.760
We just vibed.
00:38:07.840 --> 00:38:12.400
And when Mier came on the project, it was uh it was very interesting.
00:38:12.559 --> 00:38:14.639
Like all of our chemistry is just sort of worked.
00:38:14.800 --> 00:38:30.400
We I think we are all coming from a similar level of frustration on several levels, having to do with again, we're all interested in revolutionary thought, but what's positive as revolutionary is quite demeaning to that tradition, in my experience.
00:38:30.559 --> 00:38:34.719
And to your Foucault comment, and Kevin might laugh at this, I I hate Foucault.
00:38:34.880 --> 00:38:48.079
Um, I think he is a horrible person and a horrible theorist, and I think you can get a lot from other people because he was also terribly wrong on so many things, even in discipline and punishment.
00:38:48.239 --> 00:38:51.760
I know his whole evolution on prisons was quite inaccurate.
00:38:52.000 --> 00:39:06.079
Um, so I kind of hate his guts because in all the freaking classes I took, and I know this is PG PG 13, there would be so much critique about Marx, you know, as a man or as a white guy or something.
00:39:06.239 --> 00:39:16.400
But then there'd be like Foucault, who was this like white French guy who was like, power is everywhere, power is in your pinky, power is in your mind.
00:39:16.639 --> 00:39:19.840
A working class person is as powerful as a what is power?
00:39:20.000 --> 00:39:21.760
It's like, bro, we don't have power.
00:39:22.000 --> 00:39:24.239
And that's the that's the breaking point for me, was Foucault.
00:39:24.320 --> 00:39:28.480
So thank you, Foucault, for both not being around and also for pushing me in that direction.
00:39:28.639 --> 00:39:30.480
So I just wanted to add that really quickly.
00:39:30.639 --> 00:39:34.320
I can't stand that man's controversy abounds.
00:39:34.559 --> 00:39:35.440
Incredible.
00:39:35.679 --> 00:39:49.199
Yeah, I think it's it's funny because I remember when I, you know, we're sort of compelled to read Foucault if you're in any kind of humanities, any kind of soft science, quote unquote soft science, social science, or whatever.
00:39:49.360 --> 00:40:00.400
And I remember uh seeing some statistic that said Foucault was the most cited uh scholar in all social science research or or whatever.
00:40:00.639 --> 00:40:07.920
And that kind of blew my mind because I thought this is not accessible, you know, this is this is not clear.
00:40:08.079 --> 00:40:15.519
But then I realized as I developed politically, part of what this is is also obfuscating, right?
00:40:15.599 --> 00:40:40.320
This is also about, and I I do think, you know, I know Sudeep, you hate the guy, whatever, but I do think that what Foucault, he was an anti-Marxist, but he was also writing from a position of the Cold War, um, you know, and also this there were some people who were Marxists who were actually trying to hide it.
00:40:40.559 --> 00:40:54.239
What he did was also, I think, to go a little conspiracy brain here, capitalizing on the fact that there was an anti-Marx, there's an anti-communist current, you know, like sort of emanating everywhere, you know, sort of post-68, right?
00:40:54.320 --> 00:41:00.960
Like this was like a symptom of a kind of um failure, but also a symptom of academic fear.
00:41:01.119 --> 00:41:14.960
And actually, what you said, Kevin, about how teachers kind of digging into this fray method and standing back, fearing indoctrination, I think part of that is also fearing that you will be called an indoctrinator, right?
00:41:15.039 --> 00:41:21.360
That like educators themselves are considered to be a kind of enemy unless proven otherwise.
00:41:21.519 --> 00:41:26.480
And like all of these different kinds of coded ways that people talk about this stuff.
00:41:26.639 --> 00:41:34.400
I mean, I'm from, you know, an English, I double-majored in English and political science and undergrad, but then, you know, did my PhD in English.
00:41:34.559 --> 00:41:40.639
And it was about like sort of like interdisciplinary like law and society sort of stuff.
00:41:40.960 --> 00:41:45.119
Foucault is everywhere in that, and so is Derrida, and so is all of that.
00:41:45.360 --> 00:41:52.400
Um, only recently has Marxism been even allowed to really be given anything other than like a dismissal.
00:41:52.559 --> 00:41:59.360
I remember one time I in grad school I said, you know, this needs a Marxist framework to my advisor.
00:41:59.440 --> 00:42:00.400
She laughed at me.
00:42:00.639 --> 00:42:02.559
We were clearly not well matched.
00:42:02.880 --> 00:42:08.320
Like, no, I didn't like really read that until like pretty, pretty late, you know, and I was just like, well, I guess I'm stuck.
00:42:08.480 --> 00:42:15.199
But like she laughed as though it were like, I can't believe you would ever even like deign to say something like that.
00:42:15.280 --> 00:42:18.000
Like it was automatically um dismissed.
00:42:18.079 --> 00:42:25.280
And that was before I even like became kind of a hardcore, you know, like died in the wool Marxist, you know.
00:42:25.360 --> 00:42:42.480
It was just like this could benefit from this, and it was considered to be off the table genuinely from some who sank themselves deeply into the kind of Yale School of Theory, um, you know, hermeneutic method that was kind of more on the pomo side, as you, you know, kind of brought up.
00:42:42.639 --> 00:42:55.840
But then Foucault just being this like central figure of anything goes so long as you are, you know, acknowledge that you can't get outside of power or what have you.
00:42:57.360 --> 00:42:58.159
Absolutely.
00:42:58.320 --> 00:43:01.519
No, I just really briefly, I was just gonna say, like, I think I think that's absolutely right.
00:43:01.679 --> 00:43:07.840
I was gonna say that you can imprint on Foucault so many things because the other because of lack of clarity.
00:43:08.000 --> 00:43:14.320
And so it becomes a useful tool for graduate students who are sort of navigating their way through trying to understand theory.
00:43:14.559 --> 00:43:24.320
Foucault provides like a wide berth for you to uh sort of like attach your own sort of political theory to it, uh, and then you know, say that's Foucault, right?
00:43:24.400 --> 00:43:36.719
Um, and so that's the you know, there's a there's it's a way that like it lends itself to sophistry, and I and I and I appreciate you naming that because uh graduate students are actually absolutely pulled toward Foucault and away from Marxism.
00:43:36.880 --> 00:43:44.079
And I teach uh uh our PhD students um an introduction course on um critical social theory in ed.
00:43:44.639 --> 00:43:50.320
And I I am actively trying to get them away from Foucault, even as they're like, but we love him.
00:43:51.440 --> 00:43:55.039
I guess this I guess we know what our next article is about.
00:43:55.599 --> 00:44:01.360
Yeah, next several articles, because you mentioned in here you're gonna write a second article, and now they're Maybe a third in the works.
00:44:01.679 --> 00:44:08.880
I just add really quick, just about I know I'm kind of joking, but I'm not because I just wrote down Heidegger.
00:44:08.960 --> 00:44:15.280
Like there is something going on in our in our field that has a lot to do with what's mentioned in the piece.
00:44:15.360 --> 00:44:19.280
Because we're still what our research project is literally methodology.
00:44:19.440 --> 00:44:25.920
We look over several readers that are meant to teach us how to teach the students, usually undergrads.
00:44:26.000 --> 00:44:28.559
That's the main focus of our civic education.
00:44:28.880 --> 00:44:37.840
Exactly, civic education, and that's why we and we were interested in the subject from what we're all explaining because we saw little seeds of it, little nuggets here and there.
00:44:37.920 --> 00:44:40.800
So we ourselves wanted to see if that's really consistent.
00:44:41.039 --> 00:44:43.199
And it kind of was, which we'll get into, I'm sure.
00:44:43.280 --> 00:44:50.239
But I just want to add there is more room for Heidegger, more room for fascist aligned thinkers, too.
00:44:50.320 --> 00:44:55.519
So this project is not really just about taking on uh it's true pronged.
00:44:55.599 --> 00:44:59.280
Our project is really trying to take on uh two sides of the coin.
00:44:59.440 --> 00:45:04.880
One is the liberal side that is quite anti-Marxist and also yearning for an alternative speech.
00:45:04.960 --> 00:45:07.840
So that's why also in the readers, you'll see they mention Marx.
00:45:07.920 --> 00:45:16.800
So they're kind of like in their own contradiction, because they realize, I guess, mentally uh that they're reaching a wall and how liberalism can be sort of salvaged.
00:45:16.880 --> 00:45:37.280
But then the other side is this other element of you can mention Heidegger, you can mention Nietzsche, but if you mention Marx or you take Marx seriously, and not just Marx, but the Marxist tradition Claudio Jones, Lenin, uh various other thinkers, George Jackson, Asada Shakur, if you mention these people, you are definitely touching a Ron Herb.
00:45:37.360 --> 00:45:42.000
And then the third category, which we talk about at the end of the piece, which we'll get into, is US Empire.
00:45:42.400 --> 00:45:44.880
There is no conversation about US Empire.
00:45:45.039 --> 00:45:45.440
None.
00:45:45.679 --> 00:45:51.199
It's it's I think it's completely missing from any social justice analysis.
00:45:51.280 --> 00:46:06.960
And that's kind of uh one of the some of the reasons we wanted to do the project to whether or not test for if this is something that we're just seeing individually, or is this something really seen in some of the readers are actually organizing or encouraging educators to teach civic education in this way?
00:46:07.280 --> 00:46:07.519
Yeah.
00:46:07.760 --> 00:46:50.079
Teaching teachers how to um, you know, if you're not explicitly doing Foucault, you're kind of um, and I I think what you said, imprinting uh the normative framework into these, like, oh, well, this is interesting, like encouraging people to ask these questions, but always leading kind of back to individual choices, these kinds of um very state and like you know, stagnant forms of um democracy within the institutions that are considered to be, you know, relevant or or proper, um, and not, you know, really developing people's conceptions of change collectively, right?
00:46:50.159 --> 00:46:53.519
Or change like in these other avenues besides like the ballot box.
00:46:53.599 --> 00:47:21.280
And I wanna, I I do want to get into um the content here because one of the things that really drew me in um was the it's a it's a history I've heard before, but like the sort of anti-communist and cold war history of the social studies movement, because that's complicated by what had been um the progressive fight and the civil civil rights movement fight for high quality public education preparing students for democratic participation.
00:47:21.440 --> 00:47:27.119
For example, that's what the landmark case, Brown versus Board of Education, is supposedly kind of pointing towards, right?
00:47:27.199 --> 00:47:36.880
That you need to have um non-discrimination and um total integration of schools no more separate but equal because these are all democratic participants.
00:47:36.960 --> 00:47:38.320
So there's a lot of contradiction there.
00:47:38.400 --> 00:48:01.280
And I did notice that Derek Bell is cited in the work, and it's you know, Derek Bell is a huge person for me when I was doing my own research, in part because um his field critique of law um was also about this idea of um really only the benefits flowing from, you know, sort of the white side of the equation.
00:48:01.360 --> 00:48:04.719
How does this benefit, you know, sort of like white hegemony?
00:48:04.880 --> 00:48:08.800
I always like to say that Bell was probably a crypto-Marxist.
00:48:08.960 --> 00:48:23.519
Um people get shocked by that, but but a big part of what he talks about, right, is the faces at the bottom of the well and the way in which race is used to um, you know, essentially split the working class, which you mention in your own article here.
00:48:23.599 --> 00:48:26.960
I'm sure it's a very big part of all of your all's research.
00:48:27.039 --> 00:48:28.639
Um, it can't really be avoided.
00:48:28.800 --> 00:48:48.880
But I would like to talk about this the politics of this contradiction and like kind of what you see, because in a lot of ways, what we're talking about when we're criticizing sort of social studies or civic education is criticizing something that comes out of a progressive kind of impetus, right?
00:48:49.039 --> 00:49:07.920
Like, and also this is in the context of heavy critique and an attack on public education and um especially things that are considered quote unquote woke, or they mislabel it, they call it Marxist because you're saying this is not Marxist at all.
00:49:08.000 --> 00:49:14.000
This is in fact anti-Marxist, but it's it's kind of like uh a political quandary here.
00:49:14.159 --> 00:49:30.800
Like to the extent that we're we're actually all educators and interested in kind of getting at least some progressive or socialist thinking into the the minds of students to allow them to be able to become, you know, true political agents, right?
00:49:31.119 --> 00:49:33.360
Like, how do we how do we deal with that?
00:49:33.519 --> 00:49:35.199
I mean, I would like to hear what you think.
00:49:35.360 --> 00:50:05.440
This is not really a worked-out theory, it's just kind of more what comes out of your article because the study you guys do with the, you know, kind of six readers, you point out there are these patterns of pointing everyone back towards kind of the idea of good citizenship, democracy as um not collective, but rather, you know, kind of limited to individual choice and avoiding some topics altogether, or couching them in the past, right?
00:50:05.599 --> 00:50:18.559
Like couching any kind of like movement activism as like the past, as though, and and maybe you could speak about that too, um, and and kind of foreclosing the idea that this could be the future, right?
00:50:18.719 --> 00:50:30.559
That instead what we have is a liberal democracy and everyone should participate in it in their participatory way, which whatever that that happens to be, mostly just voting, right?
00:50:30.639 --> 00:50:33.199
Or like maybe making a good consumer choice.
00:50:33.440 --> 00:50:39.920
So altogether, like, you know, what's what were your you know, sort of thought processes about this?
00:50:40.159 --> 00:50:41.599
Because what are we gonna do?
00:50:41.760 --> 00:50:43.679
Throw away social studies, you know?
00:50:43.920 --> 00:50:48.000
Instead, you say political education, but how is that going to be received?
00:50:48.079 --> 00:50:52.559
You know, like how tell me about how is this gonna happen?
00:50:54.159 --> 00:50:56.880
I I can start uh unless either of you wanna talk.
00:50:57.039 --> 00:50:57.760
Uh yeah, sure.
00:50:57.840 --> 00:50:58.800
I'll start then.
00:50:59.199 --> 00:51:01.760
Um, yeah, I mean, uh, you know, here's what I'll say.
00:51:01.920 --> 00:51:06.239
Like, I I think literature in social studies ed is actually like quite expansive.
00:51:06.480 --> 00:51:30.960
Um and and even before I get there, like I'll say, like, I I'm under no illusions about like, you know, the institutions that we that we work for, uh, these like capitalist like uh sort of uh universities are gonna be interested in replacing uh this kind of hegemonic civic education framework with something that interrogates capitalism.
00:51:31.039 --> 00:51:33.840
But I do think it's important to raise the contradiction.
00:51:33.920 --> 00:51:56.800
Um and I think expose like what we've we expose in the text is that like what has been sort of operating clandestinely as like uh a neutral, politically neutral uh sort of framework for teaching about society and uh and and and political issues is actually not at all um neutral in it in it and it uh orients us toward a particular kind of like domesticated action.
00:51:56.960 --> 00:52:18.400
But what I'll say is I think uh, you know, people in social studies, and I and this is I'm gonna give some credit, people study how teachers teach, how they conceptualize issues, how you know they teach about issues, um and are usually reflecting on learning outcomes with students that like point to like the civic and political implications, right?
00:52:18.480 --> 00:52:25.360
And so social studies hasn't been avoiding this, uh, but like I said before, there's a there's a quite heavy like postmodern influence.
00:52:25.599 --> 00:52:42.559
Um, and you know, it's even like this sort of deeply theoretical work uh that raises ontological questions uh about issues in social studies ed uh and uh how we train uh folks uh is really couched in this framework around like that like embraces civic education.
00:52:42.800 --> 00:52:50.639
Um and so what we're doing in this this work is actually not super far removed from the kinds of work that folks have been doing in the field for a while.
00:52:50.880 --> 00:52:57.199
Um, you know, in the field we've been interrogating epistemology, uh practice of social studies, teacher ed.
00:52:57.599 --> 00:53:08.400
Um, and to the field's credit, it's really like pushed civic education to be more justice-oriented, you know, more intersectional, uh, you know, critical of white supremacy and patriarchy.
00:53:08.639 --> 00:53:18.400
Um but you know, what we do here that I think stands in like sharp contrast, uh, is that we read civic education specifically through the lens of Marxism.
00:53:19.360 --> 00:53:25.119
And so we're we're asking, even uh when it's at its most critical edge of conceptualization, what does it miss?
00:53:25.599 --> 00:53:27.440
What is it what is it obscure?
00:53:27.679 --> 00:53:33.840
Uh, you know, what what does it misrepresent about politics, particularly within the heart of global capital?
00:53:34.000 --> 00:53:46.079
Um and so it's civic education in some ways has evolved past the politically neutral neutrality uh, you know, on some issues and embraces like calls to racial justice reform and women's rights and immigrant rights or whatever.
00:53:46.239 --> 00:53:55.679
Um, it even sometimes embraces protest politics as a viable tactic to respond to inequalities.
00:53:55.920 --> 00:54:03.840
Uh but conceptually, civic education is never open to seriously critiquing capitalism or the contradiction of capitalist democracy.
00:54:04.000 --> 00:54:11.599
Uh it's not it's not seriously open to like radically restoring like sovereignty to indigenous people or building power for the working class.
00:54:11.840 --> 00:54:27.440
Um, understanding that even at its most critical edge, the project of civic education is engineering a commitment to progressive reform that's divorced from a critique of capitalism and the veneer of capitalist democracy as a vehicle for racial progress.
00:54:27.599 --> 00:54:32.400
And so it's a it's ultimately, you know, a tool for white supremacy and capitalism in that respect.
00:54:33.599 --> 00:54:36.320
Um I agree with all of that.
00:54:36.559 --> 00:54:44.639
Uh Michaela, I think your question is really good about the kind of contradiction or potential contradiction that the article points to.
00:54:45.119 --> 00:54:58.880
Um, we started working on this article and really like I think finished the article before the escalation of the current like right-wing fascist movement against DEI and everything it's associated with.
00:54:59.280 --> 00:55:08.079
Um, and when this all sort of blew up, I was kind of thinking, like, hmm, is now the moment for a critique of us.
00:55:09.679 --> 00:55:19.599
But I actually think it is um it because I think that the article provides a way of understanding how we got to this situation, right?
00:55:20.000 --> 00:55:27.760
Um if if I like I'm against the attack on DEI, as I assume we probably all are, right?
00:55:27.840 --> 00:55:36.400
Like it's important diversity, equity, and inclusion are important values to try to uphold in um in education.
00:55:36.719 --> 00:55:48.719
Um, we should teach about race, we should teach about um disability, we should teach about, you know, feminism and um gender equality, et cetera.
00:55:48.960 --> 00:55:54.800
But I think that DEI as a framework really bears the seeds of its own undoing.
00:55:55.119 --> 00:56:18.320
Um, if all we are if our analysis of racism and inequality is basically limited to the interpersonal and to also kind of essentialist assumptions about identity, then I think we're not equipped to actually redress racism and other forms of inequality in the academy or in society.
00:56:18.400 --> 00:56:30.960
Um and also we're then very susceptible to to kind of right-wing attacks on hip ho of like hypocrisy and insincerity um in the in the academy.
00:56:31.199 --> 00:56:44.880
Um and so, you know, you mentioned Michaela, the fact that that um, you know, Trump uh and his um supporters will sort of equate Marxism with liberal identity politics.
00:56:45.039 --> 00:56:48.320
And I think that's really interesting and instructive for the left, right?
00:56:48.480 --> 00:57:07.599
The fact that they can do that, that they can collapse Marxism and identity liberal identity politics, um, I think suggests that the that that socialists and the left have not done a great job of articulating the difference and offering an alternative to liberal identity politics.
00:57:07.840 --> 00:57:18.400
Um and um so you know, in terms of like what we should do, what can be done, um I think that students, you know, I think that we should have DEI initiatives.
00:57:18.480 --> 00:57:21.039
I think that's or maybe we, you know, reframed.
00:57:21.119 --> 00:57:25.840
And I think that students should also learn about the legal framework of the United States.
00:57:26.000 --> 00:57:28.880
Like I think students should know what the Constitution says, right?
00:57:28.960 --> 00:57:34.960
You should learn about um, you know, the the history of its of its formation and amendments, et cetera.
00:57:35.199 --> 00:57:42.960
But also as part of that education, students should be thinking about who the constitution was designed to serve, right?
00:57:43.039 --> 00:57:46.400
Like what interests is it fundamentally organized around?
00:57:46.559 --> 00:57:52.000
Um, what are the limitations of the our of the legal framework of this society?
00:57:52.159 --> 00:57:58.639
Um, why do we have the oldest constitution in the world that seems to be um kind of impossible to change?
00:57:58.880 --> 00:58:04.239
And what kind of power do um our students actually have access to, right?
00:58:04.320 --> 00:58:11.199
What kind of power in pursuing social change do working class people actually have access to, right?
00:58:11.280 --> 00:58:23.440
I think if we teach them that their power is principally or exclusively in within the political system and through the vote, uh like I think that that is doing them a great disservice.
00:58:23.519 --> 00:58:25.760
And I also think that it's disillusioning to students.
00:58:25.920 --> 00:58:28.719
I think they understand that that's not real power.
00:58:28.880 --> 00:58:44.159
Um, and I think they um understand that a kind of like nostalgic framework for thinking about civic education, the constitution, American politics is completely inadequate to making sense of the current moment.
00:58:48.320 --> 00:58:48.800
Yeah.
00:58:48.960 --> 00:58:57.280
Um I just want to so in the paper we did something that was quite simple but ended up with actually rather complex results.
00:58:57.519 --> 00:59:13.679
So for example, what we did was we go we went through six readers and we looked at key terms, um, including terms are usually like racism, white supremacy, uh sexism, and then we also added terms about labor unions and capitalism.
00:59:13.840 --> 00:59:24.960
And that's how we configured our results because what we found was there has been, rightfully so, an increase of focus on racism, uh sexism.
00:59:25.119 --> 00:59:30.559
Interesting enough, just want to add this really there, but but there wasn't any specifics also there.
00:59:30.719 --> 00:59:32.880
Like there wasn't a discussion about white supremacy.
00:59:33.039 --> 00:59:40.880
I think that terminology was almost missing from all the readers, except for one time when it was referring to Jewish folks.
00:59:41.119 --> 00:59:50.239
So it seemingly kind of gave the impression that the only group who are impacted by white supremacy are people who are Jewish, which was also quite odd.
00:59:50.480 --> 00:59:56.400
Um, but then on the political economy side, we found just a mishmash of things.
00:59:56.480 --> 01:00:12.320
So we did find uh, at least in the political science side, a discussion of global economy, but there was few discussions about global economy, and I'm doing um uh quotes here, uh, in relation to capitalism, which is part of the global economy.
01:00:12.480 --> 01:00:14.880
So this is where the results we found were quite complex.
01:00:15.039 --> 01:00:27.840
So, like what Kevin said, civic education in this day is not being taught as neutral, but it is being taught in a way that's still quite counter-insurgent or counter-revolutionary.
01:00:28.159 --> 01:00:38.559
And I think to what Nie is saying, and also part of what I'm thinking too, and all of us are thinking, is that in this project, what we're showing is you have two sides again of the same coin.
01:00:38.719 --> 01:00:51.840
You have a more conservative, right, right leaning, is putting it lightly, right, very right-wing version of civic education that hopes to say things like hierarchies, like uh racial and sexual hierarchy is good, it's natural.
01:00:52.079 --> 01:00:58.000
Um, you know, should you don't mention black or brown or Asian or woman in your research projects?
01:00:58.239 --> 01:01:07.039
Um, but then what we are also seeing is the other side of that coin, which is you can mention some of that, but there is a tipping point to how you want to describe these movements.
01:01:07.119 --> 01:01:15.519
Because what's interesting, we also saw uh terms like settler colonialism being mentioned, but they were also in reference to places abroad.
01:01:15.760 --> 01:01:20.159
So there was one part of some one of the readers that said New Zealand is settler colonial.
01:01:20.719 --> 01:01:25.599
So there was no mention of that to the United States, but it was to New Zealand.
01:01:25.679 --> 01:01:29.360
And interestingly enough, it was reduced to what Mia say to an interpersonal dynamic.
01:01:29.519 --> 01:01:38.880
So settler colonialism is now referred in these some of these readers, uh, but they still were saying to the educator, see it as discrimination.
01:01:39.280 --> 01:01:45.039
That's interesting because New Zealand also has some of the best rights for Native people.
01:01:45.119 --> 01:01:45.280
Right.
01:01:45.440 --> 01:01:52.960
Like it's yeah, so it's it's both like so far removed from the United States, but also just like historically so distinct.
01:01:53.360 --> 01:01:53.760
Exactly.
01:01:53.840 --> 01:02:06.639
And yeah, with the Maori people, and also it was just interesting exactly how they picked that place because there might be some more like students who are Maori in these classes because it's all about how the teachers should investigate these things in the classroom as well.
01:02:06.800 --> 01:02:08.079
But again, it was interpersonal.
01:02:08.159 --> 01:02:18.719
Like settler colonialism, you can address it not through land, not through anything material, but through maybe people getting to know each other, which is part of a step, but it's not the totality.
01:02:18.880 --> 01:02:20.880
So those are some of the complexities.
01:02:21.039 --> 01:02:25.360
So we're not saying that there isn't politics behind civic education anymore.
01:02:25.519 --> 01:02:30.719
It's just a certain kind of politics that's quite uh anti-material.
01:02:31.599 --> 01:02:54.800
Well, something really interesting that's coming to mind here too is that like the collapse of um the framework of race conscious admissions and affirmative action um the last couple of years, like I teach those cases, those um, you know, from Baki through like, you know, the Texas cases through the most recent ones with the SFFA.
01:02:55.199 --> 01:03:05.440
And one thing that needs to be kind of noted is that diversity became in some way more materialized with the Baki case.
01:03:05.519 --> 01:03:19.760
Um, this is from 1977, when they decided actually this will be good for people going into the job market to have diversity in education because they'll have encountered all these people from different places.
01:03:20.000 --> 01:03:27.760
And since colleges were, you know, now it's much more common for people to go to college, but in the 70s it was, you know, quarter of the population or so.
01:03:27.920 --> 01:03:37.119
These are going to be the managers, they're gonna be the leaders in the military, they're gonna be all of these different leaders in and captains of industry, supposedly.
01:03:37.360 --> 01:03:58.079
So therefore, to have diversity also means that they'll be better at this, they'll be better at managing people or commanding people, because that's what you know, people were thought of like, you know, if you're a college graduate, then you're going to be going into something that where you're going to be in charge of workers or, you know, some some uh version of worker.
01:03:58.320 --> 01:04:31.920
Um, and what's interesting to me about the you know contradictions and the things that you guys are sort of teasing out is that the education that people get is kind of like very much in in a training almost of like how you get along with other people, like in a what we would call a multiracial democracy, but for them it's more kind of like the field of humanity, kind of like, you know, like these encounters that you might end up finding uh applicable to your own like sort of self-development.
01:04:32.719 --> 01:04:33.039
Right.
01:04:33.280 --> 01:04:40.719
Yeah, etiquette or like a kind of like, oh, well, you know, if someone disagrees with you, like how do you know, how would you deal with it?
01:04:40.880 --> 01:04:44.800
You know, do you wouldn't want to like know how to like question or debate.
01:04:44.880 --> 01:04:54.960
Instead, you would just want to be tolerant or accepting on the basis of kind of these um, you know, watch words of don't be racist, don't be sexist or what have you.
01:04:55.119 --> 01:04:59.119
And I'm, you know, we're we're at an hour here.
01:04:59.280 --> 01:05:06.079
I think we could like probably talk about that entire thing like all together for another hour if we wanted to.
01:05:06.239 --> 01:05:12.960
Um, but I do think that in the the realm of what's possible, right?
01:05:13.119 --> 01:05:31.599
Like what is possible, what this application of political education could be, um, a power analysis of like how people really do relate to each other, it was broken open by the ease by which um DEI was able to be dismantled, right?
01:05:31.760 --> 01:05:50.400
And also the fact that you didn't see any corporations that supposedly were getting the benefits of all of this diversity being kind of like filtered up through the education system, fighting back um very hard on you know the fact that this was supposedly to the benefit of greater society.
01:05:50.719 --> 01:05:59.760
I I could I should just say that for a while I've been thinking, and I presented at a Lawn Society conference a a few years ago about writing a longer article about decommodifying.
01:06:00.239 --> 01:06:01.039
diversity.
01:06:01.199 --> 01:06:12.639
You know, that that is like a like so a socialist view of diversity should be about, you know, this is about like human flourishing and the human experience.
01:06:13.039 --> 01:06:24.480
And please go ahead and diversity, democracy, like they're all socialism because they've been so associated with capitalist imperialism.
01:06:25.280 --> 01:06:26.639
And that's a huge problem.
01:06:26.960 --> 01:06:34.159
Like what it would have like to have an active divide meaning activity and program.
01:06:34.639 --> 01:06:35.039
Yeah.
01:06:35.280 --> 01:06:45.199
Something you said at the socialism conference, um, which was I thought really great because we, you know, it was kind of under this idea of like, is there a socialist humanism that we can like retrieve?
01:06:45.280 --> 01:07:02.320
And you're like, humanism is actually kind of like a problematic word in you know politics, you know, like anthropocentrism or like this kind of like human-centered thing, obviously then there's this automatic or at least we're used to an automatic kind of exclusion, like who gets counted or something like that.
01:07:02.480 --> 01:07:13.280
But I think that this what you're just saying goes right along with that, which is what would it mean to have socialist diversity that isn't just a rehash of the stuff that has been taken away from us?
01:07:13.440 --> 01:07:31.280
What would it mean to actually transform this concept or to look back to some of our, you know, our socialist um you know forefathers, for example, uh Dewey wrote about diversity in education a long time ago, but he's been completely like washed out.
01:07:31.440 --> 01:07:41.840
And it's um you know I'm I'm excited to think about that stuff, but it does kind of like hit on like the what is to be done question, I think, pretty hard.
01:07:42.000 --> 01:08:12.400
So to say like the so this is the thing like for us for me at least for this project it's it is about questioning that approach but it's also about exposing how these institutions and how some people who teach in these institutions have not saying they weren't sincere but in some instances like at least with the administrations right at various universities how quickly they've given up on these fights to Trump just exposing they never cared.
01:08:12.639 --> 01:08:24.479
Because I'll say personally as a person of color following the George Floyd death and then the protest there was a little bit of a moment in political science of diversity and pushing for that even more.
01:08:24.720 --> 01:08:32.479
But even then it was quite calculating in my view and also very precarious to use a Kevin's term for something else.
01:08:32.560 --> 01:08:41.760
Like it was very obvious to me that some of it was just about like there were there were terms like I support but for instance I just want to say like the framing would be like this.
01:08:41.920 --> 01:08:54.399
So instead of I mean you can still say decolonize the syllabus which is important but something I kept bringing up to a lot of my peers many of them white was what we're doing is not just decolonizing.
01:08:54.560 --> 01:09:30.399
What we're doing is actually providing real history like for instance like how do you talk about the expansion of the Supreme Court without talking about the expansion of stealing of land because a lot of the Supreme Court cases had a lot to in the early decades having to do with justifying these weird uh uh uh you know relationships and contradictions between the US proper and these so-called independent nations which then were also meant to be dependent basically colonized so that was a big part of the Supreme Court so for those people liberals or conservatives who teach law in that way they're not teaching law they're teaching lies.
01:09:30.800 --> 01:09:41.680
What what we're trying to suggest and what we're trying to say that what we would like to see is a real history which is tending towards materialism and socialism but nonetheless is a reality.
01:09:41.920 --> 01:09:46.159
So those are those are the type of examples I would see in terms of framing and reframing.
01:09:46.239 --> 01:10:02.640
And then about what to do um I personally don't think this article really contends with that because that would be a whole other article what it what I would suggest to anyone is a still join an org to talk about this with more people if you're an educator.
01:10:02.720 --> 01:10:05.920
So be part of your union grad or late your faculty.
01:10:06.159 --> 01:10:12.159
But also just be the be one of those people just aware of what's what your students are bringing into the classroom.
01:10:12.319 --> 01:10:23.359
That's the other thing like if someone was to read this and they're like a colleague of mine, I would just like for them to just know and be like, oh interesting I didn't realize this is some of what they might bring into the classroom with me.
01:10:23.520 --> 01:10:28.319
And I think that's just the small end version of what a person can quote unquote do.
01:10:28.479 --> 01:11:28.720
But until we have like a revolutionary party and until we have organic intellectuals mixing it up relationally with these parties I think it's still going to be a tough swap for any one individual to sort of contend with what does it do what does it do question um of like revolutionizing the academy um we we are all teachers you know and hopefully every a lot of people who are hopefully a lot of uh teachers will read our article and um and it is you know I'm thinking about these pedagogical choices all the time right like how am I how am I positioning myself um in the classroom?
01:11:28.880 --> 01:11:37.840
Like am I actually um you know kind of centering power and power analysis in the way that I teach about politics, you know?
01:11:38.560 --> 01:11:52.479
And I think that you know pedagogically like we're all you know able to make choices about um about you know what what kind of history we teach to Sadi's point, what conceptions of democracy we offer students, right?
01:11:52.560 --> 01:12:08.079
Like do we present or do we just you know we can very easily um it's almost very difficult not to default to an understanding of democracy as synonymous with the American political system and America as synonymous with democracy.
01:12:08.239 --> 01:12:14.720
And I think that's that that concept of democracy does so much ideological work that is rarely interrogated.
01:12:14.880 --> 01:12:22.239
So even just like framing to students like what is meant by democracy in this context and what do you think of that?
01:12:22.399 --> 01:13:10.880
Like that's I've done that and it's been like very illuminating and interesting um I think we have a responsibility as educators not to set our students up for political disillusionment and apathy because if we lie to them or if we you know if we give them these kind of like nostalgic and dishonest you know representations of our history and of you know the kind of um foundations of the American political system, they will understand that that is you know I think it's to the point about DEI, it's like very disillusioning I think to a lot of our students to see the way that the universities and other institutions have completely backed off of those commitments.
01:13:11.279 --> 01:13:22.960
And I think it makes them feel like disillusioned with themselves as well and with the kind of you know commitments and that they espoused you know in 2020 or 2021.
01:13:23.439 --> 01:13:33.119
And something I've found myself saying to students is like well it's very painful to believe something and not to be able to enact it right in the world.
01:13:33.199 --> 01:13:39.439
And that can lead us to the can to just abandon the belief or the commitment right or the analysis.
01:13:39.920 --> 01:13:49.680
But that's not that's not you know that's not the only way to go right um but then they need tools for actually understanding how could we change society?
01:13:49.840 --> 01:14:03.199
Like how could we actually redress structural racism um and inequality um in order for them not to just become politically apathetic.
01:14:03.920 --> 01:14:04.319
Yeah.
01:14:04.560 --> 01:17:17.920
I what I just want to say something because I I'm and I'm uh at the risk of like bringing us back to something we've already covered in the uh some of what uh I think and actually think this is important so I'll just say it I I don't think that the civic education that readers at least in the social studies field uh is engaged in or at least trying to socialize students uh pre-service students to embrace is is actually like the kind of like banal like stuff that like some of the some of the older like uh readers might have uh embraced it's not like just saying like hey go vote and be a good person I think it's actually doing something a bit more insidious and I think what that that thing is is uh something that like all of us have spoken to at this point is doing this really uh interesting sometimes partial sometimes you know uh uh some sometimes critical uh uh a sort of conceptualization of like problems in the society so for instance you might see um you know uh a uh a reader discuss something like undocumented citizen uh undocumented folks' rights and and injustices they experience right and I think that's like that that's an interesting thing right in it in it and it positions the reader to be uh uh uh the the reader as in the the text uh to be like uh sort of embraced as like a sort of progressive text the the sleight of hand though is that what it what it often does encourages you to do like and so it embraces like a sort of critical take on these things but the sleight of hand is that it encourages you to think about these issues as disconnected from um political economy and to understand not just uh in and even if it like so yes it it it does ask folks to sort of think about like what their own sort of individual level of participation will be uh you know around uh these issues but it but it also it also you know the one reader uh I think the 2021 social studies reader uh which I think had an sort of uh an explicitly um you know uh critical framing I can't remember the title of that one um but it it was it was like you know uh it it it you know was encouraging about like protest politics right and so like there there are these like really interesting ways that like these readers are asking people to do more than the banal like sort of civic participation stuff but it's but it's always disconnect it's it is never for asking them to question the uh structural the structures and relationships to uh our our relationship to to uh labor our relationship to capital our relationship to uh capitalist democracy all of those things are off the table for for question and critique and so you the the the most you can do is think about like you know why these things are problems and to get together with some people and like express your grievance about these issues and then that is and that's that's it right and that's that's sort of like where we're that's those are the tools we're sort of left with to sort of think about like our way out of these things.
01:17:18.720 --> 01:18:10.079
So it's it's it it it does this really good job of like and I think I see this with my students um and I teach mostly like PhD and EDD students there is they they are really bereft of of of an of an analysis of social change that doesn't include like that that that isn't like super individualist um you know like teachers who are like you know I'm just gonna go in a classroom and I'm gonna teach these issues uh that we're talking about in class and I'm like yeah that's great and I think I think that that's actually wonderful but like what what does it look like for you to organize with your your teacher peers to do so like to to sort of make a structural intervention or what does it look like for you to organize with the community and the students to sort of impose like you know to build power to impose uh a curriculum and impose like a mandate around teaching some of these things like that's that's what I'm what I'm trying to get you to do.
01:18:10.159 --> 01:18:23.439
And I think civic education does not offer young people uh a framework to think about things in that way because it's it's it's always asking them to participate in the in the in the sort of given democratic process uh as it exists.
01:18:23.840 --> 01:18:33.439
Yeah and I think the issue thing you're saying just reminds me of the sort of Solinsky method of community organizing where everything is around like people's one issue.
01:18:33.600 --> 01:18:42.720
Like what is the issue that you care about and are going to invest yourself in rather than making these issues actionable and organizing around them.
01:18:42.880 --> 01:18:47.439
Instead it's about advocacy right like or like the most you can do is advocacy.
01:18:47.520 --> 01:19:05.600
And I was just going to say Kevin that it's interesting you mentioned 2021 reader having this part where it says protest is good because they would have been missing completely if they had not put that in there because the George Floyd protests and Black Lives Matter happened the year before.
01:19:05.680 --> 01:19:33.920
And I remember when that happened and it was you know during the pandemic everyone was like what can we teach in order to address this right and I actually started teaching a course that I'd already had been thinking about called police power that sort of related both to COVID as well as you know the protests that were happening and it was you know through a Marxist critique of power but also kind of like a survey course about the concept of police power in the United States.
01:19:34.079 --> 01:19:36.960
But everyone was like looking to be like, oh this will be popular.
01:19:37.119 --> 01:19:39.439
This will be the thing that like hooks the students.
01:19:39.680 --> 01:20:03.039
And I think that for political education what we want to do is um give people the tools to be able to essentially create participation within their own development and education and consciousness rather than just being like entertained or otherwise you know kind of like ah yes I have just inculcated some knowledge into myself and now I have built myself, right?
01:20:03.119 --> 01:20:18.159
It's more kind of like what does it do to actually give people the ability to um participate deeply in their own education and part of this is about asking questions that then get people in connection with each other, right?
01:20:18.319 --> 01:20:31.760
To um think about like who could I talk to about this who'd be who want to make this issue actionable with me and actually like work on it together and like make it into something more to try to change things, right?
01:20:32.000 --> 01:20:37.359
Because I think that what you say in your article is about like social change, but there's no content given, right?
01:20:37.439 --> 01:20:43.279
It's like the individual it's up to the individual to like figure out like what their limit is for social change.
01:20:43.359 --> 01:20:56.159
And usually it's like voting maybe going to a protest um you know maybe getting an internship at like you know uh some like washperger or like you know one of the perks or something like that.
01:20:56.479 --> 01:21:04.079
What it I do think they give some actionable items but it's very messy and muddled.
01:21:04.319 --> 01:21:14.000
So like the disconnect part that Kevin talked about is the is really very intentional right so you kind of have to piece things together a lot.
01:21:14.159 --> 01:21:26.720
And obviously the main thing is to say to student because they do mention right wing populism in the other reader as being the problem then it sort of disappears from the rest of the text so they are they're trying to touch things to make them seem relevant.
01:21:27.039 --> 01:22:01.199
So I think these readers also reflect a lot of the contradictions of our fields and the contradictions are emerging from class contradictions racial but also empire I I keep relating because for for instance um and actually going because I want to say something about Palestine but before that political education's purpose is about yes um getting people actionable but it's also like I kind of mentioned before it's about teaching clarity like actual stuff like I want all of us to position ourselves as the real people who know what people need to know.
01:22:01.439 --> 01:22:31.439
Because even if like at the end of our article we talked about briefly what a political education program would look like and we do say that even if you're a student who's not a Marxist, this is not just meant for everyone who's a Marxist obviously we'd prefer if everyone was but let's say you are a student involved in just getting your rent reduced the way that civic education would position that in the American context is to lobby your politician your city council to go to New Brunswick City Council.
01:22:31.600 --> 01:22:34.640
What we are saying is that that's not objectively true.
01:22:34.960 --> 01:23:07.840
Objectively you would need to go to or you need to know who your enemy is and your enemy is not just the politician it's the developers behind them who may have other sessions during the week that you're not part of so even if your if your mindset's not revolutionary you still need to know thy enemy right you need to know the the the the actual political landscape and civic education however meaningful the people are because I'm not arguing again that they're insincere it's not it's not giving the right clarity to students to really activate even on the liberal end what they need to do.
01:23:07.920 --> 01:23:16.159
So advocacy to your point they're actually teaching their students to advocate for sure but even on the smaller things they need to advocate for they're giving them the wrong analysis.
01:23:16.399 --> 01:23:28.880
Like even if you care about racial discrimination which I do you're not going to get far just by lobbying the administration of a university without realizing that administration is also beholden to other interests.
01:23:29.039 --> 01:23:36.640
So that's kind of what I think political education should be doing which is clarifying the actual political landscape that people are in.
01:23:37.359 --> 01:23:37.920
Yeah.
01:23:38.319 --> 01:23:44.159
And I just I think it's a form of in in it it's a form of diseducation or miseducation.
01:23:45.359 --> 01:27:20.079
I think what we're talking about with political education is actually the kind of work that we need to do to overcome the propagandized forms of education about our society that civic education inheres uh most of the time young people who are talking about like uh how to change things in it in at least in my our uh in my classes uh are like have a really limited framework for thinking about change and and it's not at all a an accident or a coincidence right I mean you know every every semester everyone has this dramatic awakening they had no idea there were banana wars they have no idea that that you know United Fruit Company existed uh and it still exists as Chiquita Banana and you know is uh responsible for some of like the the most horrific uh uh um you know uh uh crimes against humanity in uh Latin America and these are and and these are people who have been in the field teaching as social studies educators or it's teaching uh um elementary school students uh for for decades right and so and so there is there is also an a an a a matter that like naming accurately like what we're up against not just uh like a like a sort of uh a banal or uh uh uh toothless form of uh of education about society it's actually one that is depoliticizes and is asking people to be more domesticated in their in their um engagement with like the the the you know horrific things that like happen under capitalism colon colonialism yeah I think domesticated is a an a great word because part of this is also turning students into obedient participants in capitalism um since we're all college level educators you know what we see often are students who have aspirations to you know not be part of the quote unquote middle class which we know doesn't exist right but also to not be you know somebody who who's who's precarious right like who who who wants to like have a life and and everything and I think that what what you were saying um about the insidiousness of of this and and and it's also like let's be let's be frank they're struggling to get it past the censors you know it's not like these books can just like be put out and you know with uh with the message when they're being put through you know it's a it's a whole industry you know textbooks are a whole industry and um they're responsive right to like the market and they're trying to sell to as many uh schools as they can and all and all of that but as educators you know when we're thinking about what could we do to also um supplement these things with some you know some synthesis right like what what are the kinds of things that we can kind of pull out because you know one of my um adjectives I describe myself as I'm an eclectic Marxist you know like I don't just deny the worth of like you know lots of theory um because it doesn't happen to be Marxist or maybe it's an anti-Marxist but part of the skill one of the key skills I would say maybe the the ultimate skill is teaching students how to do synthesis without then becoming relativist right like without then becoming you know kind of what you said Mia is disillusioned but I would say even like disillusionment can sometimes lead to radicalism, right?
01:27:20.159 --> 01:27:29.439
If you're like if you really hit rock bottom but disillusionment can also just get to like oh well I guess I can't do anything and like I'm just gonna follow along now.
01:27:30.159 --> 01:27:30.399
Yeah.
01:27:30.560 --> 01:27:51.760
Anyway it was an excellent article and um I just wanted to ask before we wrap up is there anything that you can suggest on um what you'd recommend to people listening if they'd like to learn more that's not about the article or something that is more accessible if you're not part of an um an academic community that you would say like you know kind of hits on some of these ideas?
01:27:52.720 --> 01:27:55.119
I would say read's new book.
01:27:55.520 --> 01:28:02.720
I was gonna say just out with with um uh university University of what's it called, Kevin?
01:28:04.000 --> 01:28:05.039
Oh yeah, go for it, Kevin.
01:28:05.119 --> 01:28:06.159
You entered me.
01:28:09.840 --> 01:28:16.239
Yeah, this is this is not a video podcast, but uh I guess this is activism, youth political education, and free market common sets.
01:28:16.640 --> 01:28:17.279
Excellent, excellent.
01:28:17.439 --> 01:28:19.520
We'll put a link to that in the the show notes.
01:28:19.600 --> 01:28:23.199
Um, but anything else um that folks should read?
01:28:23.520 --> 01:28:37.359
You could also read Sudeep's or listen all read and listen to Sudeep's um public-facing work, but lots of really excellent podcast interviews that touch on a lot of the themes of the article.
01:28:39.760 --> 01:28:41.359
Sudeep has too many to list.
01:28:42.079 --> 01:28:43.279
Yeah, I guess.
01:28:43.520 --> 01:28:45.039
Um I'm trying to think.
01:28:45.199 --> 01:28:48.800
Well, I'm also I just wanted to bring up one last thing to be annoying, which is related to the book.
01:28:48.880 --> 01:28:58.239
I know this is not a video podcast, but uh I would recommend, because this is also free, Ghassan Khanafani's uh The Revolution of 36 to 39 in Palestine.
01:28:58.479 --> 01:29:08.079
Um the I just want to add the thing about this article that's important is because we were correct on this one very fundamental thing, which was kind of wave through.
01:29:08.319 --> 01:29:15.199
Uh regardless of the era, whether it's been pre or post-Trump, there isn't any discussion about a US empire.
01:29:15.680 --> 01:29:16.960
I I keep repeating that.
01:29:17.119 --> 01:29:20.880
And the main contradiction I've seen with my students is Palestine.
01:29:21.119 --> 01:29:38.079
So a lot of my students are coming to class feeling a little bit confused because they're seeing all the images of people being burnt alive, killed by the Israelis and the Zionists, but then no one brings it up, which is its own form of weird gaslighting and psychosis that's created for them.
01:29:38.319 --> 01:29:49.439
And they tell me that because I asked, I have I have been taking more of a insistent approach, let's say, on really naming the names, meaning like this is wrong, this is a genocide, blah, blah, blah.
01:29:49.520 --> 01:29:50.399
There's no two sides to it.
01:29:50.479 --> 01:29:52.640
Like to your point, there's no relativism.
01:29:52.960 --> 01:29:57.199
But I do often offer them articles about how to get how we got here.
01:29:57.359 --> 01:30:00.159
I go through the UN website, things are seen as objective.
01:30:00.239 --> 01:30:06.800
But I just want to say, in our in our article, we mentioned how US empire is not named ever.
01:30:07.199 --> 01:30:12.399
The only time there's any discussion about empire, it's always like China, bizarrely, which is bullshit.
01:30:12.720 --> 01:30:22.239
And then when it comes to Palestine, you can find exactly what we're describing in this article with us today, which is progressive or liberal, except for Palestine.
01:30:22.560 --> 01:30:31.600
We have a genocide going on, but I have all my students keep saying there's no one else in a lot of the departments having to do with social science, bringing up anything.
01:30:31.760 --> 01:30:39.279
And when Ukraine was invaded, I remember distinctly political scientists rushing to now name the name of colonialism.
01:30:39.520 --> 01:30:43.920
And so I want to refer to Ghassan Khanafani because he was a co-founder of PFLP.
01:30:44.079 --> 01:30:51.279
He was assassinated by the Israelis along with his niece, who I think was 17 years old, and he has a lot of amazing work, which is actually quite accessible.
01:30:51.439 --> 01:30:54.640
Um, so one of it is the revolution of 36 to 39.
01:30:54.800 --> 01:30:57.840
And I just wanted to mention that because I still feel suffocated.
01:30:58.000 --> 01:31:06.800
Like I am always paranoid teaching about Palestine because I feel like that's the that's the other red line that's kind of intimated in art.
01:31:07.119 --> 01:31:11.760
It's dangerous, and it's dangerous for those of us of color, all of whom are here talking about it.
01:31:11.920 --> 01:31:23.840
Mia, Kevin, and I like we do feel a sense of like people will also assume things about us off rip, which kind of weirdly pushes us to that decision-making part.
01:31:24.159 --> 01:31:28.079
But there's a lot of people of color, white and people of color, who've not broached this issue.
01:31:28.319 --> 01:31:32.479
And I think it's uh it also tells you again how civic education is a lie.
01:31:32.720 --> 01:31:45.520
If you don't talk about Palestine, you are lying to your students and you're preparing them for a future in which they're just gonna be, to Nier's point, quite confused and dispassionate because internally they know something is going on, but they're being told to not care.
01:31:45.600 --> 01:31:47.680
And then finally, one of my students did bring up Epstein.
01:31:47.760 --> 01:31:49.760
A lot of my students did bring up Epstein a lot.
01:31:50.319 --> 01:31:52.880
And again, I asked them, do people bring it up?
01:31:52.960 --> 01:31:55.920
And they say no, and then they tell me like it just feels weird.
01:31:56.079 --> 01:31:58.239
Yeah, so reality is sorted.
01:31:58.319 --> 01:31:59.520
I mean, that's part of it too.
01:31:59.680 --> 01:32:20.560
It's like it's like a really gross and sorted thing to talk about, and students also um might not know how to talk about it in terms of uh political ruling class connected to capital because it is like obviously very creepy, conspira like conspiracy laden and all of this stuff.
01:32:20.720 --> 01:32:35.119
And I would say if I were a teenager who has not been prepared well to kind of like interrogate these things, I would feel embarrassed and like un and and like feel like I'm like, how do I talk about this without sounding like some kind of pervert?
01:32:35.600 --> 01:32:36.319
You know, yeah.
01:32:36.560 --> 01:32:53.279
I bring it up because one of my students, I was asking them something to do with just general politics, and one of them brought it up and said, she said, how it just reinforced what she was thinking and how it just made her mind basically melt because it was just so, like you said, sorted.
01:32:53.520 --> 01:32:57.279
But also the language of power in politics, it's there, attempted.
01:32:57.359 --> 01:32:58.880
Like I'm talking about social science.
01:32:58.960 --> 01:33:01.039
If you're in STEM, you know, whatever.
01:33:01.119 --> 01:33:03.279
Do I this is also just my take on STEM.
01:33:03.520 --> 01:33:05.199
God, you know, God bless you.
01:33:05.359 --> 01:33:05.840
You're great.
01:33:06.000 --> 01:33:06.880
STEM is amazing.
01:33:06.960 --> 01:33:09.039
They're they're the only field that matters, apparently.
01:33:09.279 --> 01:33:11.199
So anyway, so just whatever.
01:33:11.279 --> 01:33:13.359
Just like, you know, God bless, not a chef's kiss.
01:33:13.520 --> 01:33:21.359
But all I'm saying is that they bring it up because there's a tension between the reality of what they're living and a tension between what they're supposed to be thinking.
01:33:21.439 --> 01:33:22.239
And one last thing.
01:33:22.399 --> 01:33:29.439
We're also pushing against the idea of lived experience to Kevin and Nia's earlier point of view about Freire, F that.
01:33:29.760 --> 01:33:32.239
There's always been revolutionaries who said you need to read.
01:33:32.560 --> 01:33:36.560
I'm sorry, as a person of color, there is a ceiling to what I knew.
01:33:36.880 --> 01:33:45.600
I I was an Obama person because I was saying, okay, I elect somebody, he's gonna do the thing, and he also knows about Hindus and Muslim folks, which I'm growing up.
01:33:45.840 --> 01:33:53.279
I learned through reading, this is an recycled process of trying to get us away from other alternatives.
01:33:53.359 --> 01:34:00.399
So reading is important, lived experience, Kukodian logic is limited on purpose.
01:34:00.720 --> 01:34:04.880
Not everything you learn is gonna come from your personal conviction.
01:34:04.960 --> 01:34:14.720
You're gonna have to read and learn collectively and go to amazing professors like Kevin and Mie, who are going to, you know, give you stuff that's difficult, and that's okay.
01:34:14.880 --> 01:34:20.079
Yeah, and me, which I'm just gonna be ranting about Foucault every single class, like Foucault, whatever, or Heidegger.
01:34:20.239 --> 01:34:23.520
But I'm just saying, me, Kevin and Mie are amazing scholars, and that's the other thing.
01:34:23.600 --> 01:34:28.800
Like, this is about scholarship, and we're losing that with these sort of civic education trainings as well.
01:34:28.960 --> 01:34:30.720
Sorry, I just couldn't help myself with that.
01:34:31.039 --> 01:34:32.079
I just want to add one thing.
01:34:32.159 --> 01:34:33.680
I am Sudeep.
01:34:33.840 --> 01:34:35.840
Um reading is fundamental.
01:34:36.000 --> 01:34:37.439
Let's be let's be totally clear.
01:34:37.600 --> 01:34:39.920
This is a reading yes podcast.
01:34:40.159 --> 01:34:56.720
Yeah, we have to we have to learn and we have to change um in order to have um, you know, have have uh be equipped to, you know, to actually try to um make this society less depraved.
01:34:57.039 --> 01:35:11.039
Um but I wanted to just also add as a recommendation, yeah, to Sidip's point about Palestine and its the effect on students of the silence, silence and silencing around Palestine and the academy, um, to democra to the point concept of democracy.
01:35:11.119 --> 01:35:19.279
I mean, I've been I've been teaching this like um required class at BARD that's all about like American democracy, which is why I'm talking so much about American democracy.
01:35:19.439 --> 01:35:22.640
But what a contradiction that they're living through, right?
01:35:22.880 --> 01:35:33.760
There's like over there has been for a very long time overwhelming, you know, public support for a ceasefire, and yet the genocide continues with our tax dollars, right?
01:35:34.079 --> 01:35:41.520
Um, the war in on Iran is compl is not popular at all with any part of the American public, and yet it continues unabated.
01:35:41.760 --> 01:35:46.880
And so, you know, if we we have it's just like you said about like being speaking the truth, right?
01:35:46.960 --> 01:35:48.960
Like speaking to reality, right?
01:35:49.119 --> 01:35:56.479
Like that in what what concept of democracy do you need to have to call this society a democracy while those things are happening, right?
01:35:56.640 --> 01:36:05.520
There is no alignment between there's a this is like a 2014 study that I keep citing, but I wish they would do it again so it could be more um more credible.
01:36:05.680 --> 01:36:19.439
But there was this study by two um in Perspectives on Politics by two uh like Princeton political scientists about the relationship between people's policy preferences and policy outcomes in the United States.
01:36:19.600 --> 01:36:30.880
And they found that there's no correlation between ordinary people's policy preferences and policy outcomes from Congress, but there is a positive correlation between elite policy preferences and policy outcomes, right?
01:36:31.039 --> 01:36:34.880
So it's just like, you know, when we're talking about democracy, like let's start there, right?
01:36:35.119 --> 01:36:44.159
Um, and on that point, one reading suggestion, Jodie Dean's like pretty old book, um, Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies.
01:36:44.560 --> 01:36:45.920
Um, it's very provocative.
01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:48.800
I'm trying to, you know, I'm trying to figure out what I think about democracy.
01:36:49.039 --> 01:36:49.920
Well, it's Jody Dean.
01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:50.560
She's provocative.
01:36:51.600 --> 01:36:52.239
And I love that.
01:36:52.399 --> 01:36:53.199
I love that about her.
01:36:53.359 --> 01:37:11.600
But the chapter on democracy, I think, is like the best thing I've read, really kind of um um interrogating the meaning of democracy and posing the question of like, is this a recoverable concept, given the ends to which it's been put specifically by US imperialism?
01:37:11.760 --> 01:37:21.520
So I think that that's just a great um place to start in thinking um critically about the discourse of uh political science and civic education.
01:37:21.920 --> 01:37:44.479
Yeah, on that, and just to sort of wrap things up, I also think the point you made about the fact that policy outcomes and policy preferences are so far apart, this should actually be very encouraging for socialists because while we're constantly being told people will not accept socialism, people won't no, that's actually not true because working class people have an interest, right?
01:37:44.640 --> 01:38:07.439
Like they have a very a set of very um clear common interests and um you know political priorities that are uh denied to them, um, both through the education that they they are are served up, right, through through the schools, as you guys like it sort of um pull out, and also through these kinds of you know, uh media machinations.
01:38:07.520 --> 01:38:21.119
And and the thing is, is that a lot of us, you know, who are both organizers and educators, I find that my organizing and my educating go hand in hand and they kind of like play off of each other and learn from each other, right?
01:38:21.279 --> 01:38:26.640
I've become a better organizer because of my uh the fact that I'm an educator and vice versa.
01:38:26.880 --> 01:38:39.840
And so much of this is also about pulling people closer to the truth, even if it takes longer than one conversation, and it certainly isn't necessarily the case that you can just tell somebody something and they believe it.
01:38:40.000 --> 01:39:05.039
But part of this is also about giving people the agency or showing people how they can, how they can gain the agency to question the world that they live in and direct it towards their interests and those of other people and finding commonality in others, which is, I think, part of this diversity, you know, like what it could mean to have a sort of socialist reclamation of diversity.
01:39:05.199 --> 01:39:09.840
It's like, what is the difference between diversity and just celebrating difference?
01:39:10.000 --> 01:39:13.840
Well, diversity is also about the world we actually live in.
01:39:14.079 --> 01:39:16.640
The fact that this is the world we really live in.
01:39:16.800 --> 01:39:19.279
Not, you know, people are not uniform, right?
01:39:19.439 --> 01:39:26.319
People do not have, you know, are not monoliths, uh, racial groups are not monoliths, women are not monoliths, these people, you know, we're not monoliths.
01:39:26.399 --> 01:39:30.560
What we are, though, are people who have the power of language.
01:39:30.800 --> 01:39:36.800
We have the power of communication, we have the power of of being part of a society, right?
01:39:36.960 --> 01:39:39.119
And how do we, how do we shape that?
01:39:39.439 --> 01:39:42.079
Um, being honest with each other, really.
01:39:42.239 --> 01:39:53.199
Like I found that in organizing and in in education, students and people who are just on the doors appreciate it when you are direct with them and you're not trying to manipulate them, right?
01:39:53.279 --> 01:39:55.920
And they're you're not trying to politics them, right?
01:39:56.079 --> 01:39:57.600
And you're speaking to their interests.
01:39:57.760 --> 01:40:18.000
And I think that this is, you know, this has been a great conversation just about like what that looks like from uh an education point of view, from like what it really means to provide a comprehensive and and uh grounded civic education that directs people towards like what do you really think about this, right?
01:40:18.079 --> 01:40:22.159
Like what like what and what are the ways that you feel empowered and not disillusioned?
01:40:22.399 --> 01:40:23.600
So we'll end it there.
01:40:23.680 --> 01:40:28.399
And I just want to thank all of you, Mia, Sudeep, and Kevin, for joining us today.
01:40:28.720 --> 01:40:29.359
Thank you.
01:40:29.680 --> 01:40:31.119
Thank you so much for having us.
01:40:31.279 --> 01:40:36.399
This was really um interesting and yeah, um a useful conversation for me.
01:40:37.359 --> 01:40:42.479
Thanks as always to our guests and our production crew, Emma, Michael, and Tim, who put this all together.
01:40:42.800 --> 01:40:54.560
Class is a podcast of DSA's National Political Education Committee, or NPEC, which works to expand the knowledge of DSA members and non-members in the service of winning the struggle for socialism and democracy.
01:40:54.960 --> 01:40:59.520
You can find out more about NPEC by searching for us online or following us on social media.
01:40:59.680 --> 01:41:05.199
But the best way to find out what our committee is up to is by signing up for Red Letter, NPEC's monthly newsletter.
01:41:05.359 --> 01:41:10.239
And if you aren't already, you can become a DSA member by following the link in the podcast description.
01:41:10.800 --> 01:41:13.039
Okay, until next time, solidarity.
00:00:10.960 --> 00:00:18.079
Hi comrades, and welcome to CLASS, the podcast of Democratic Socialists of America's National Political Education Committee, or NPEC.
00:00:18.480 --> 00:00:23.199
My name is Michaela, and I'm the current chair of NPEC and a member of North New Jersey DSA.
00:00:23.679 --> 00:00:28.559
Before we dive in, a reminder that CLASS is available on all major podcast platforms.
00:00:28.800 --> 00:00:33.039
Please consider becoming a DSA member by following the link in the podcast description.
00:00:33.280 --> 00:00:40.159
You can also send us a message about the episode and sign up for Red Letter, NPEC's monthly newsletter using the provided links.
00:00:40.399 --> 00:00:56.880
And we want to call all DSA members' attention to the opening of applications to the National Political Education Commission, which is now an open body for any and all socialist educators, writers, researchers, and trainers to join us in shaping political education for the future.
00:00:57.119 --> 00:01:04.560
We're aiming for a big, diverse body, so we want to especially encourage non-men and comrades of color to join NPEC now to start in the fall.
00:01:04.799 --> 00:01:09.359
The application, with more details and contact info, is linked in the show notes.
00:01:10.480 --> 00:01:20.959
Something I noticed when I started to teach college in the 2010s was the use of the term classism or describing specific actions, events, books, or people as classist.
00:01:21.760 --> 00:01:34.959
For example, a course I commonly teach on science fiction and the good society that's popular the first years, we would be discussing a near future system of production where all human workers are minutely controlled by robots.
00:01:35.120 --> 00:01:41.120
And a student, often one really concerned with social justice, would call what was happening classist.
00:01:41.519 --> 00:01:50.000
Because it had to do with work and workers, the identification of the oppressed as classed was a discrete category like sexism or racism.
00:01:50.319 --> 00:02:14.319
To be fair, I think the use of the word was meant to express an injustice of a serious and fundamental kind, but I was surprised at how readily the phrase came to their tongues and was agreed to, that class antagonism was akin to the immoral mistreatment or discrimination of individuals or groups by others, not really about the necessary exploitation of a capitalist system, much less historical struggle or social transformation.
00:02:15.039 --> 00:02:28.000
I admit I'd only heard the word classist as invective hurled by social justice people on the internet before that, so I lazily assumed the word emerged from social media until I read the article we're discussing today by our three guests.
00:02:28.240 --> 00:02:48.000
It taught me that social justice concepts employed across civic education in middle and high school systematically de-emphasizes critical thinking about social relations, class in particular, and dehistoricizes them in favor of choice discourse, individual activism, and surface-level democratic rhetoric.
00:02:48.240 --> 00:02:53.120
The authors call this pedagogical project social justice nationalism.
00:02:53.680 --> 00:02:59.039
Kevin is an associate professor of black studies and education at Rutgers University, New Brunswick.
00:02:59.360 --> 00:03:07.280
Mia is an assistant professor of politics at Bard College, and Sudeep is a doctoral candidate in political science at Rutgers.
00:03:07.520 --> 00:03:20.319
And their article is called Making the Case for Political Education: a Critical Discourse of Undergraduate Civic Education in Social Studies Education and Political Science Readers, published in March in New Political Science.
00:03:20.560 --> 00:03:22.719
Welcome, Kevin, Mia, and Sudeep.
00:03:24.319 --> 00:03:25.439
Thank you for having us.
00:03:25.759 --> 00:03:26.800
Hi, thanks for having us.
00:03:26.960 --> 00:03:27.759
Happy to be here.
00:03:28.159 --> 00:03:30.159
Hi, thanks again for having us too.
00:03:30.479 --> 00:03:31.840
Yeah, well, thank you so much.
00:03:32.000 --> 00:03:36.319
I really appreciated um getting a chance to read this article and discuss it with you.
00:03:36.479 --> 00:04:06.000
Um, as I mentioned in my introduction, I'm also an educator and I have received students who have been um immersed really in like, you know, this sort of social studies or civic education uh curriculum from various, you know, places in all over the country and have noticed some patterns that I I found to be pretty interesting, but I didn't kind of put it together that this is all from this particular site or not all from, but like primarily like around this.
00:04:06.080 --> 00:04:08.240
And I found it to be incredibly enlightening.
00:04:08.319 --> 00:04:10.159
So really excited to talk to you.
00:04:10.240 --> 00:04:14.159
Um, but the first question is for uh first guests on the show.
00:04:14.240 --> 00:04:17.920
And we always ask, how and why did you become a socialist?
00:04:18.160 --> 00:04:22.720
And if you are part of DSA, how did you decide to join?
00:04:23.519 --> 00:04:23.920
Sure.
00:04:24.079 --> 00:04:33.839
Uh, so I grew up a liberal, although I didn't have the language of liberalism really to describe my own ideology.
00:04:34.480 --> 00:04:45.839
And I didn't become a socialist until pretty late in life when I was um in a PhD program at Yale University, and I got involved in unionizing my workplace.
00:04:46.240 --> 00:05:04.639
That experience um really helped me to develop a political analysis uh that centered the way that capitalism shapes the political economy of our society and of the university and the possibilities for democracy uh within the academy.
00:05:05.360 --> 00:05:13.920
My exposure to organizing through that experience also was really important for my development as a socialist.
00:05:14.240 --> 00:05:29.600
I had previously actually interned for Organizing for America, which was the Obama administration's attempt to develop a community organizing project, and I found it to be a very confusing and kind of disillusioning experience.
00:05:29.759 --> 00:05:44.000
And so then when I was exposed to a left-wing tradition of labor organizing, my theory of social change changed in a way that um that predisposed me to socialism.
00:05:44.399 --> 00:06:00.160
And then I joined DSA around the same time in 2016 with the big, you know, wave of millennials who joined DSA in response to the first Trump administration and also the Bernie campaign.
00:06:00.319 --> 00:06:05.279
Uh, and I um joined what was then the Central Connecticut chapter of DSA.
00:06:06.079 --> 00:06:18.000
And currently I live and work in the Hudson Valley in New York, and I am a member of the Mid-Hudson Valley chapter of DSA and a co-chair of our Palestine Liberation Working Group.
00:06:18.399 --> 00:06:18.800
Great.
00:06:19.040 --> 00:06:25.759
And also notably a former member and hopefully maybe future member of National Political Education Committee.
00:06:25.839 --> 00:06:28.639
Um, you know, one of the OGs, in fact.
00:06:28.800 --> 00:06:30.560
I think I I recruited you.
00:06:30.639 --> 00:06:32.720
Um I don't think I'm an OG, but you do.
00:06:33.040 --> 00:06:38.160
Well, you're not you're not from the first the first wave, but you're from like the first couple of terms.
00:06:38.319 --> 00:06:42.000
Um left your imprint for sure.
00:06:42.160 --> 00:06:43.439
People miss you there.
00:06:43.680 --> 00:06:49.439
Um, Sideep, you wanna uh give your round?
00:06:49.920 --> 00:06:50.319
Sure.
00:06:50.480 --> 00:06:59.680
Um I had uh a similar sort of trajectory in terms of Obama, well, in terms of the Obama years being very disappointing.
00:06:59.759 --> 00:07:04.399
So that sort of accelerated my need for an alternative.
00:07:04.560 --> 00:07:08.480
But I did grow up in a peak Leninist family, actually.
00:07:08.639 --> 00:07:12.079
So my family comes from uh West Bengal, India.
00:07:12.240 --> 00:07:23.360
They've had, at least at that point when they arrived in the United States, they were still uh rule ruling sounds really weird, but they had been winning elections consecutively for some decades.
00:07:23.439 --> 00:07:26.000
It's the CPIM, the Communist Party of India, Marxists.
00:07:26.079 --> 00:07:32.399
There's a there's a Communist Party of India uh that was uh older, but this one split off uh in the 50s.
00:07:32.480 --> 00:07:34.720
So that became the ruling party.
00:07:34.879 --> 00:07:44.399
Uh it still exists in West Bengal, it's been very suppressed, actually, um, and had been also ruling Kerala, India, which is in the South.
00:07:44.480 --> 00:07:46.000
But my family comes from that background.
00:07:46.160 --> 00:07:51.040
So growing up, I always had some uh funny interactions with my parents about that stuff.
00:07:51.199 --> 00:08:02.079
So for instance, if my dad got, I don't I think like instances where I'd bring home homework about uh League of Nations or self-determination, he would look at it and say, uh Lenin said that or something.
00:08:02.240 --> 00:08:04.240
So I had some of that in my background.
00:08:04.399 --> 00:08:07.600
Um but they're also very liberal to Mier's point.
00:08:07.680 --> 00:08:11.759
I grew up technically between the two of those kind of worlds, it's kind of blurred the lines.
00:08:11.920 --> 00:08:16.160
Um, but I had that understanding, so I didn't fear communism.
00:08:16.319 --> 00:08:22.959
Um, but what really got me into DSA was not just 2016, but 2018 when AOC ran.
00:08:23.360 --> 00:08:26.079
Um, because I was a little bit hesitant at first.
00:08:26.240 --> 00:08:36.799
Uh I didn't know a lot about DSA, and obviously at that time DSA had finally grown from a lot of you know smaller chapters to now what it is now with tens of thousands of members.
00:08:37.200 --> 00:08:40.080
107,000, I think, is the last account.
00:08:40.399 --> 00:08:49.519
Yeah, so it's grown really exponentially, which brings a lot of like good things and also some issues that we have to sort of deal with, but that also is part of like how fast it's grown, which is a good thing.
00:08:49.679 --> 00:08:54.240
Um, but uh I joined in 2018 around that time because of AOC.
00:08:54.399 --> 00:08:56.559
Obviously, now I have a lot of issues with her.
00:08:56.720 --> 00:08:58.879
Um, but I've still remained a DSA member.
00:08:58.960 --> 00:09:02.240
I was co-chair of the Central Jersey chapter for a few years.
00:09:02.399 --> 00:09:04.879
Uh I was running the poly ed at that same time.
00:09:05.120 --> 00:09:06.480
I was co-chair of that.
00:09:07.039 --> 00:09:08.799
I was the leader of that actually.
00:09:08.960 --> 00:09:11.279
Uh a lot of people dripped in and out.
00:09:11.440 --> 00:09:14.399
Um, and then I'm currently a Philly DSA member.
00:09:14.480 --> 00:09:18.639
I'm part of the Red Star caucus, and I don't know why my Jersey accent came out for that.
00:09:18.720 --> 00:09:24.879
And also I'm also uh I'm also um part of the DSA editorial board.
00:09:25.039 --> 00:09:27.759
So I'm the managing editor of Socialist Forum right now.
00:09:27.840 --> 00:09:31.679
It's been great, it's been fun, and I'm still happy to be part of this org.
00:09:32.000 --> 00:09:32.720
That's awesome.
00:09:32.879 --> 00:09:33.279
Yeah.
00:09:33.440 --> 00:09:34.639
Um, Kevin.
00:09:35.120 --> 00:09:37.120
Hey, so I'm the outlier here.
00:09:37.279 --> 00:09:39.440
Uh I am not a DSA member.
00:09:39.759 --> 00:09:43.840
You are a fellow traveler, and we love our fellow travelers, don't we, folks?
00:09:45.200 --> 00:09:47.200
Um, thank you.
00:09:47.440 --> 00:09:54.000
Uh so uh I I grew up uh similarly like in a in a household that was liberal.
00:09:54.080 --> 00:10:01.200
I wouldn't have used that word either to describe like my parents' uh kind of like political orientation.
00:10:01.440 --> 00:10:13.919
Uh though my parents were very critical of white folks and like you know, experienced all kinds of like problems on on the job and you know, last uh people hired, first fired.
00:10:14.080 --> 00:10:20.639
Uh, you know, there was a a a kind of like a discourse that was like in my house.
00:10:20.720 --> 00:10:30.399
It was very clearly like pointing out like how uh how precarious uh work uh would be for my uh for uh black folks.
00:10:30.480 --> 00:10:51.440
And my my parents wanted to instill in us in a lot of ways uh like the values of like uh hard work and like you know uh you know being twice working twice as hard uh to be you know a couple of steps behind just because we knew uh or they knew that you know racism would ultimately meet us uh when we got to the labor market.
00:10:52.240 --> 00:11:06.399
Um and so that was that was kind of like a a part of like how I grew up that like I guess like uh provided an entryway uh for me to move beyond like a liberal sort of understanding of politics.
00:11:06.639 --> 00:11:10.320
It wasn't really until I got to my PhD program.
00:11:10.480 --> 00:11:11.919
Um it's really interesting, Mia.
00:11:12.240 --> 00:11:14.240
You said that too, that my PhD program.
00:11:14.480 --> 00:11:18.399
And it's unfortunate, like when you're to like I mean, I'm I was trained in a PhD program.
00:11:18.559 --> 00:11:24.000
I'm actually a faculty in the same program that I got uh my PhD in.
00:11:24.240 --> 00:11:49.039
Um and uh, you know, there is uh absolutely um in education and as a field, um an embrace of critical politics, there's a lot of uh uh discourse around social change and education as a vehicle for social change, but a lot of it is rooted in uh kind of like postmodern um framework.
00:11:49.279 --> 00:11:51.440
Um, and I wasn't aware of that.
00:11:51.519 --> 00:12:08.639
And so, like, as I'm like quote unquote, you know, becoming more radical, uh there are people who were actual Marxists who were uh like kind of like criticizing my framework, like who were like really like pushing back on like the way I was uh talking about issues.
00:12:08.799 --> 00:12:22.480
Um I had a really good friend in uh not in my program, but was but they were also getting a PhD at the time who was organizing with the union and who um you know just had like a stronger uh foundation um in her politics.
00:12:22.639 --> 00:12:32.960
Uh she really became like instrumental in helping me to see past like some of the postmodern ways in which like I was thinking about the world.
00:12:33.200 --> 00:12:43.759
Um and uh it set me uh on a course to reading and you know, uh want to say it was probably like the most like radicalizing thing I read at that point.
00:12:44.000 --> 00:12:48.399
Um uh Black Awakening in Capitalist America by Robert Allen.
00:12:48.639 --> 00:13:07.759
Um and that was uh a pivotal turning point for me, like helped really expose liberalism for what it is, um, the limitations of nationalism, uh nationalism that doesn't include uh uh a sort of uh critical um framework uh for getting at capitalism.
00:13:07.919 --> 00:13:12.000
And then I'm also uh kind of like started studying the Panthers, right?
00:13:12.080 --> 00:13:19.120
And I think that that you know gave me like I guess kind of like a basic framework for moving beyond liberalism at that point.
00:13:19.679 --> 00:13:20.000
Yeah.
00:13:20.240 --> 00:13:31.039
So that's how you kind of became aware, like it was kind of like a a class consciousness explosion in a way, of like just being like, this is how everything came together.
00:13:31.279 --> 00:13:34.240
So you come by you come by this article really honestly then.
00:13:34.960 --> 00:13:36.399
Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
00:13:36.559 --> 00:13:37.279
Yeah, absolutely.
00:13:37.360 --> 00:13:39.440
And I and I'm not even sure if I would say an explosion.
00:13:39.519 --> 00:13:43.440
I kind of it was kind of like a steady creep toward like radicalism.
00:13:43.600 --> 00:14:07.840
Um, and I mean, even you know, even like when once you've been like so deeply uh like trained and socialized in like liberal postmodern like uh frameworks, it's hard to uh sort of catch your set, like to catch, you know, where like certain um ideas are coming from uh when you uh sort of embrace uh like a particular view of the world.
00:14:07.919 --> 00:14:10.720
And so like, you know, I guess maybe that's not even the way to put it.
00:14:10.799 --> 00:14:25.759
Like I think you I started to realize that some of the ideas that I uh was holding about my my own um life in politics were were really inadequate for explaining like what was happening um um to me.
00:14:26.000 --> 00:14:32.399
Um and there was a you know a way that like as a graduate student, like many of us are like really poor.
00:14:32.559 --> 00:14:49.440
Um and that wasn't, you know, and if you just have a race framework, right, to to think about like being, you know, like your feelings of alienation as a grad student, it it often it it misses uh what's really fundamentally a sort of class exploitation experience.
00:14:49.759 --> 00:15:07.600
Um and I think we we were able to uh some of us I think who were um being moved toward the left were able to uh kind of reach for Marxism and and find some um find some clarity in it to help understand our experience.
00:15:07.759 --> 00:15:08.000
Yeah.
00:15:08.320 --> 00:15:08.559
Yeah.
00:15:08.639 --> 00:15:13.679
I mean the records has also like a well-established uh graduate student union.
00:15:13.840 --> 00:15:26.240
And um, like Mia, I also became socialist or an organized socialist through union organizing when I was organizing at Cornell um and like put together that exploitation piece.
00:15:26.399 --> 00:15:35.759
Um, you know, while the university was trying to tell us that we were privileged, you know, we, you know, had this up these opportunities to learn, blah, blah, blah.
00:15:36.080 --> 00:15:39.919
We realized that our labor was actually what was keeping the university going.
00:15:40.080 --> 00:15:46.399
And if we were to stop, then it would all be game over for, you know, what they were trying to do.
00:15:46.559 --> 00:16:04.080
It really um helped me put together the theory and the practice praxis, as they say, but also helped me realize kind of my own missteps before with the theory that I had just been, you know, sort of given as true.
00:16:04.240 --> 00:16:08.559
For example, Foucault, you can't get outside of power, it's all diffuse, blah, blah, blah.
00:16:08.879 --> 00:16:11.919
It helps, you know, it's like, you know, losing yourself in that.
00:16:12.080 --> 00:16:20.240
To be honest with you, there's still some things about Foucault we can use, but you kind of have to, I think, have a political analysis.
00:16:20.480 --> 00:16:34.559
And, you know, we're all Marxists here to realize what it is you can take or leave and not just um, you know, take what your advisor tells you as sacrosanct or something, um, or what your favorite teacher tells you.
00:16:34.720 --> 00:16:46.240
And I think that's really kind of maybe a meta-level of this article because we're talking specifically about how people are educated in their formative years, but we're lifelong learners, right?
00:16:46.399 --> 00:17:13.680
Like, you know, we're always learning and developing our political analyses and how we kind of receive this um sort of normative framework of, you know, either capitalism is inevitable or, you know, individuals have uh it in their agency specifically to kind of shape social change the way that they feel like without any um, you know, kind of collective action, I think is like really key here.
00:17:13.839 --> 00:17:20.000
But I know that um we want to get into the sort of the method and like the research.
00:17:20.079 --> 00:17:41.440
It sounds like Kevin, you also like as a, you know, I think black studies and education, very sort of like, you know, not narrow, but like a sort of like um heavily uh you know historicized section of you know, sort of this whole endeavor of like pedagogy and and education.
00:17:41.599 --> 00:17:45.200
Can you talk a little bit more about the work that you do in this?
00:17:45.359 --> 00:17:50.400
Like maybe expand a little bit, and then we'll ask Mia and Sudeep as well about their work areas.
00:17:51.200 --> 00:17:53.039
Yeah, you yeah, you mean like my my research?
00:17:53.519 --> 00:17:54.640
Yeah, your research, exactly.
00:17:54.960 --> 00:17:55.279
Yeah.
00:17:55.519 --> 00:17:56.400
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:17:56.559 --> 00:18:05.920
I mean, so uh, you know, this is it's funny because I just had to submit my materials for Tang in and give me a chance to kind of like think about what I have been doing up until this point.
00:18:06.000 --> 00:18:11.839
Um, because I don't think it was absolutely clear to me if I were to say, like, well, you know, this is the kind of you know work that I do.
00:18:12.000 --> 00:18:21.279
Uh, but in in general, like I'm I am studying black education and political ideology uh through the lens of political economy.
00:18:21.440 --> 00:18:52.319
Um, and I am uh uh by and large, like looking at like black schools and communities as places where politics are happening and where there are hidden dimensions of political economy that are sort of shaping um what's happening in those places, um, and uh sort of surfacing the tensions that come up there, uh, even when they oftentimes operate under really opaque frameworks that don't give uh uh don't bring political economy into view, right?
00:18:52.480 --> 00:19:11.279
And so uh that my my work is largely about kind of exposing those hidden dimensions of political economy and then really uh providing an alternative framework to make politics really front and center um in issues that are happening that like appear relatively apolitical in schools and communities.
00:19:12.480 --> 00:19:13.119
Yeah.
00:19:15.680 --> 00:19:33.759
Uh yeah, so in poli sci, most of my focus is on uh seeking out the potentialities and at least growing the the body of research in poli sci having to do with the political alignment or misalignment between people of color.
00:19:34.000 --> 00:19:39.200
So in focal science there is a growing amount of research on this topic, but still not enough.
00:19:39.359 --> 00:19:51.440
So so typically, even to the day, uh and Mie can speak to this a little bit too, because I think she's seen this where um a lot of the research still does this like white or non-white binary when it comes to discussing politics.
00:19:51.519 --> 00:20:02.240
And sometimes white, black, or white, Latino, usually Asian Americans are slumped in as other, uh, along with you know people who are mixed race or biracial, which doesn't make sense because it's very different categories.
00:20:02.480 --> 00:20:22.000
But uh so my dissertation, for example, is a qualitative in-depth relies on qualitative in-depth interviews of people in and around Jersey City, because Jersey City is a very quote unquote majority minority area, even though I hate that term, but it's essentially the US is returning to its pre-colonial roots finally.
00:20:22.240 --> 00:20:26.880
Um I live in Union City, which is 80% Latino.
00:20:27.200 --> 00:20:27.519
Right.
00:20:27.680 --> 00:20:28.160
Exactly.
00:20:28.480 --> 00:20:37.440
I live in I live in a uh the house was owned by an Italian American, so we like to say that we're actually doing reverse gentrification by moving into an Italian house.
00:20:38.000 --> 00:20:38.640
That is really fun.
00:20:38.960 --> 00:20:44.079
I mean, yeah, I mean, some of them move into the other suburbs, I guess, but uh that's pretty funny.
00:20:44.160 --> 00:20:48.720
Yeah, Union is also very Cuban American, but yeah, that whole region is very interesting to me.
00:20:48.880 --> 00:20:52.079
I grew up in Jersey, I grew up in Queens, that's where I'm born and raised.
00:20:52.240 --> 00:20:56.640
Uh, but I grew up in central Jersey, so I've always been interested in these questions for a lot of reasons.
00:20:56.799 --> 00:21:01.039
One of which is also how do we create these coalitions we need for power?
00:21:01.200 --> 00:21:04.400
And a lot of those discussions need to happen on the quote unquote non-white side.
00:21:04.480 --> 00:21:10.880
So again, in political science, there's a sort of tendency to think, well, there's racism, so these groups will just manifest.
00:21:11.119 --> 00:21:30.559
But I obviously think there's a lot more nuance there, especially on the ground level, when it comes to places like Jersey City, where you have a multitude of Democrats, and you might have some instances of people of color having a multitude of options to go with their real heart, as opposed to the national question, which is usually like pitting a Democrat who's awful against someone who's a fascist like Trump.
00:21:30.640 --> 00:21:35.920
So therefore you see these kind of like people of color sliding one way versus the other sometimes.
00:21:36.160 --> 00:21:48.480
Um but yeah, the question that we're asking in this uh project that also drew me to this project, and Kevin was the one to reach out to me, and then we also reached out to Mie about it, has a lot to do with, again, my own research.
00:21:48.640 --> 00:21:59.839
Because even though I'm attacking this question of coalition building, it's through the perspective of of course, I'm looking for data, but I'm also through the perspective of someone like Claudia Jones, who was a Marxist Lannist.
00:22:00.720 --> 00:22:07.279
Because again, as you kind of referenced in Foucault, there's also another issue where there's a huge emphasis on difference.
00:22:07.759 --> 00:22:12.319
If there's any difference, it gets emphasized to suggest there's no universal language.
00:22:12.880 --> 00:22:21.920
So my project is not necessarily to be totally against that because it I have to find the data, but I am finding the data with my interviews already being done and I'm writing it.
00:22:22.799 --> 00:22:31.519
That a political economy needs to be part of our reasoning as to like what to expect that African Americans, Asians, and Latinos would talk about.
00:22:31.680 --> 00:22:36.880
Because many of them in my research said housing, even if on other issues they differ, right?
00:22:36.960 --> 00:22:41.839
So again, the political economy stuff, like like Kevin said magnificently, is part of that lens.
00:22:41.920 --> 00:22:48.559
And that was really missing, to be honest with you, in how I was politically taught in academia.
00:22:48.960 --> 00:22:50.400
Not so much with my family.
00:22:50.559 --> 00:22:56.799
My family, my dad would always mention working class stuff, but like Kevin, also racism plays a big role.
00:22:56.880 --> 00:23:00.720
So there's another interesting element of why I was a little bit hesitant with DSA at first.
00:23:01.039 --> 00:23:03.440
But in academia, I was taught opposite.
00:23:03.599 --> 00:23:11.119
I was actually taught to emphasize difference to a to a certain extreme degree and to suggest that there is no universal language.
00:23:15.680 --> 00:23:38.240
So I think listening to everyone talk about their journeys to socialism, I was reflecting on the fact that I think for all of us, um we were all academics, and there was some experience of like a contradiction between the way the academic frameworks that we were given to think about politics and our actual experiences of politics.
00:23:38.319 --> 00:23:51.920
Um that was that very much that contradiction is really at the heart of my research because that experience of trying to unionize my workplace in grad school completely changed my research trajectory.
00:23:52.079 --> 00:24:10.640
I I totally rewrote my perspective, my dissertation perspective in my third year to a, to a, from like a history of political thought project to a project that's really about, I would say I'm new to this language, I'm trying it out, but kind of like the phenomenology of political of left political organizing.
00:24:10.880 --> 00:24:34.880
Um, and I think part of what I experienced as a grad student was that um many of I was organizing democratic theorists, like people who professionally think about democracy, and many of them felt that the practices of organizing that we were engaged with in our union were intrinsically undemocratic because they involved trying to change people, right?
00:24:35.039 --> 00:24:40.319
Like trying to change people's minds and doing so by trying to engage them in kind of a collective.
00:24:40.480 --> 00:24:45.279
Um, and there were certainly undemocratic aspects of the union that I was a part of.
00:24:45.440 --> 00:24:53.680
Um, but that that that kind of experience really led me to think about like, well, what is the concept of democracy that my field is premised on?
00:24:53.759 --> 00:25:00.480
And why is there actually like nothing about organizing in this whole um in this whole discipline?
00:25:00.640 --> 00:25:12.240
Um, and so then I wrote a dissertation that is about, well, now it's become a book that's really about um the relationship between self-emancipation and organizing.
00:25:12.720 --> 00:25:35.519
Um and, you know, often we think about we use words like self-emancipation or self-self-organization, self-activity to invoke a kind of like um spontaneous process of like unleashing an oppressed self that is that is like sort of bounded and stable and um and um not in flux.
00:25:35.759 --> 00:25:51.119
Um but in fact, the process of organizing, if we take seriously the idea that we are shaped as political subjects by our circumstances, right, including our participation in oppressive institutions, um, has to involve changing ourselves, right?
00:25:51.279 --> 00:25:56.720
We have to change as, you know, into new political subjects from within oppressive conditions.
00:25:56.880 --> 00:26:26.880
Um, and so I'm kind of trying to think of that as like a fundamental antinomy or kind of paradox of organizing, and then um, and then try to, I try to argue that actually many of the most intractable and kind of explosive controversies in left political organizing, including debates about leadership, like whether the organizer is a leader or a facilitator, debates about like manipulation, what distinguishes organizing from manipulation.
00:26:27.039 --> 00:26:32.160
Um, these are these kind of stem from this underlying antinomy of self-emancipation.
00:26:32.319 --> 00:26:36.559
Um, and I and I think about organizers as political theorists.
00:26:36.799 --> 00:26:57.039
And then my book really tries to engage the way that canonical um American 20th and 21st century organizers have encountered um these problems and controversies and the resolutions that they've um articulated through their practice.
00:26:57.839 --> 00:27:00.559
Well, I would like to talk more about that for sure.
00:27:00.720 --> 00:27:17.920
Because it sounds um, it sounds like, I mean, we already know that we've been through, you know, maybe a little bit of a similar journey, having gone through that thing that we went through, which was, you know, trying to organize our colleagues, many of whom um didn't want to have their minds changed, in fact.
00:27:18.000 --> 00:27:20.079
Um, but we were trying to win a union.
00:27:20.319 --> 00:27:33.359
I guess um, you know, what I'm hearing also in common, and and Mia, you sort of touched on this, I think, a little at the beginning of what you were saying, is that everyone is engaging in a critique of their fields, um, you know, throughout like your research.
00:27:33.680 --> 00:27:49.519
And what this article does is take that critique of the field, both education and political science, and kind of um create a sort of, I would call it a hermeneutic, um, because you're using like sort of this keyword conception.
00:27:49.599 --> 00:27:55.279
I don't know if your fields have a different term for that, but that's the the word that kind of came to mind.
00:27:55.440 --> 00:27:59.279
But it also is a a collective project you guys wrote together.
00:27:59.440 --> 00:28:02.559
So um maybe you could talk a little bit.
00:28:02.640 --> 00:28:07.279
Um you talked about it a second ago, Sudeep, about how you sort of got interested in it.
00:28:07.359 --> 00:28:11.359
It was kind of a hook with like very related to like what you were already looking at.
00:28:11.680 --> 00:28:15.200
But how did the article start and how did you decide to write it together?
00:28:15.359 --> 00:28:19.440
Like what were your experiences as well with your own teaching?
00:28:19.599 --> 00:28:25.839
Maybe if you've taught, I mean, I know Mia, you teach because you teach at BARD, and there's a lot of teaching going on at BARD.
00:28:26.000 --> 00:28:27.920
Um, and then you know, Kevin, you're a professor.
00:28:28.000 --> 00:28:35.200
I don't know, Sue Deep, if you've um had a chance to teach undergraduates and if there's any resonance there, but also want to talk about your methods.
00:28:35.279 --> 00:28:41.759
So maybe first short, like just how did you how did you all meet each other and how did you decide to write this?
00:28:41.920 --> 00:28:53.519
And then maybe like what were any experiences you've had that made you think, oh, this needs to be like I've noticed this, or maybe if you didn't notice it, you like heard anecdotally or something.
00:28:53.839 --> 00:28:54.640
Mia, go ahead.
00:28:54.720 --> 00:28:55.920
You can start this one.
00:28:56.960 --> 00:28:57.279
Sure.
00:28:57.359 --> 00:29:06.240
Well, Kevin and I met through the podcast the dig during the pandemic, um, because Dan Denver, the host of the podcast.
00:29:06.480 --> 00:29:14.799
Um and a friend, um, friend and comrade uh of mine um uh mentioned in the past.
00:29:15.119 --> 00:29:20.000
I think he mentioned something I had said actually, I think, about this like paradoxical connectivity.
00:29:20.480 --> 00:29:26.400
Um and um on an episode, and then Kevin, I think, wrote again with like connecting the end.
00:29:26.559 --> 00:29:31.200
And then we had some great conversations, we assume, during the pandemic about our research.
00:29:31.279 --> 00:29:35.680
And then I think Kevin and Sudeep really developed the idea for this article.
00:29:35.839 --> 00:30:09.440
Um, and then Rob invited me in, and I was really excited to participate in research with both of them, first of all, because I really admired their work, um, and also because um my own experience in political sciences that they alluded to had really led me to a critique of specifically the concept of democracy that I think is really hegemonic, both in uh democratic theory scholarship, but also in the teaching of political science and of civic education in particular.
00:30:10.799 --> 00:30:14.160
Yeah, anything to add to that for either of you guys?
00:30:15.279 --> 00:30:26.799
Yeah, I'll just say quickly because I it meeting Mia was was absolutely the way she described that was uh really important for me at that moment because I was working on my book.
00:30:26.960 --> 00:30:32.319
Well, I was working on an edited volume and working on my sole author book at that time.
00:30:32.480 --> 00:30:39.359
Um, and both of them sort of raised questions that align with the like kind of like fundamental premise of this article.
00:30:39.519 --> 00:30:47.519
Um, but uh Mia had uh this really dope article in um uh what is what is the uh journal, Mia?
00:30:48.160 --> 00:30:49.440
The Ella Baker one.
00:30:49.759 --> 00:30:50.240
Yeah, yeah.
00:30:50.480 --> 00:30:51.680
Um American Political Science.
00:30:52.160 --> 00:31:00.720
American Political Science, yeah, which has actually become like a really um anchoring piece in um my book in its uh second chapter.
00:31:00.960 --> 00:31:14.559
But uh I think I had for a while been disillusioned with like the frameworks uh that I was trained, like I mentioned before, that I was trained uh with and I was trained by folks who were social studies educators.
00:31:14.720 --> 00:31:23.440
Um and so there was a part of me, especially like during the years while I was in grad school, Michael Brown, you know, murder.
00:31:23.599 --> 00:31:53.680
There's you know, uh all kinds of like discourse happening um around Black Lives Matter, uh had encounters with um, you know, several texts, uh Keonga Taylor's uh Black Lives Matter, the Black Liberation, uh, that were really helping me to develop a critique of, I think, some of the most common and um accessible um ways of sort of understanding that moment um and uh the kind of like liberal nationalist politics that were developing.
00:31:53.839 --> 00:32:04.319
Uh and you know, it's also the like very uh, you know, classic big big L liberal stuff that was coming up in MP on on NPR that was uh, you know, critiquing rioting, right?
00:32:04.400 --> 00:32:08.319
Like as a uh, you know, black folks rioting in in Ferguson and things like that.
00:32:08.480 --> 00:32:29.440
Um and so those things have sort of been the impetus for my book, uh the uh edited uh collection, uh The Promise of Youth, Youth Anti-Citizenship, you know, kind of like you know, social studies uh has uh given us, or education rather has given us some ways to think about citizenship and good citizenship that fundamentally misalign with some of the things that I'm seeing in the street right now.
00:32:29.599 --> 00:32:32.640
Um and people are actually, you know, destroying property.
00:32:32.799 --> 00:32:45.599
Uh and that's a and and and you know the things that I'm hearing on the radio and I'm and I'm in the ways that people are talking about it in the uh halls of academia um are saying, like, well, this is backwards and this doesn't make any sense, this is ridiculous.
00:32:46.400 --> 00:32:48.000
But I have a different perspective.
00:32:48.160 --> 00:32:58.160
Um and then I was also participating in um, so my dissertation project uh was uh something called youth participatory.
00:32:58.319 --> 00:33:01.039
I was doing something called youth participatory action research.
00:33:01.599 --> 00:33:06.079
Uh and par is I'm sure you're familiar with participatory action research.
00:33:06.160 --> 00:33:16.559
Uh PAR with youth is sort of grounded in uh understanding of frere that prioritizes uh student-centered learning.
00:33:17.039 --> 00:33:27.680
Um and uh what is often missed, however, is uh the uh the importance of political education um in that work.
00:33:28.000 --> 00:33:42.160
Um and what what becomes sort of central is the teacher's posture of like, you know, stepping to the back, being a peer uh in the classroom, and like uh sort of kind of like dis dismantling the hierarchy in the classroom.
00:33:42.319 --> 00:34:01.440
And Mia and I had kind of bonded over this uh, you know, some of the challenges I was having with this framework and like talking about like, you know, the the kind of like uh the kind of like uh fear of indoctrination that I think undergirds like the issue, like excuse me, the way that they frame um my part.
00:34:02.079 --> 00:34:27.119
Um and so like all at the confluence of all of these like projects and sort of like the ways I'm thinking, I'm sort of like understanding like what's happening in the world and like you know, the the the limitations of the frameworks that I had been given, all of that is like really producing like in me like the need for more like uh I I wanted like a a conceptual boost and an empirical boost to kind of support the argument that I was making.
00:34:27.360 --> 00:34:34.000
Um and uh you know that this this project became a vehicle to do that.
00:34:34.159 --> 00:34:54.480
And so my my uh you know, my friend, uh my good friend Martina uh introduced me to Sudeep, um, who was uh already like someone who I had uh been aware of uh reading some of his work in press, uh, but uh had not been connected to him formally.
00:34:54.719 --> 00:35:24.639
And uh Sudeep and I just hit it off and we started thinking about like the thing that I was raising um that I you know just mentioned, and uh started to get we started to get the work on like what was like the the I kind of like the the sort of basic framework for this uh for this project and uh reached a point in uh in the writing and thought like, hey, like this, you know, I I was thinking, you know, Mia, uh who you know, I was building this relationship with would be a great addition to this.
00:35:24.800 --> 00:35:34.079
Um and so she uh you know we reached out to her and she was super amenable and like we just really became like really cl we we got really close really quick.
00:35:34.239 --> 00:35:39.360
Uh we we ended up uh you know just really uh loving doing this work.
00:35:39.519 --> 00:35:42.559
Um but yeah, I think I think that's that's my version of the story.
00:35:42.719 --> 00:35:43.360
I don't know if I have to do that.
00:35:43.519 --> 00:35:48.400
CDP, you've been interpolated, so why don't you go ahead and uh finish us out here and then we'll talk.
00:35:48.480 --> 00:36:06.239
I'd love to hear also more about your thoughts about the method you used, um, you know, because it was explained in the article as a kind of compilation, but you also met each other via like sort of these like more social and organizing, you know, circles, even though, you know, are podcasts organizing?
00:36:06.400 --> 00:36:07.920
I don't know, maybe the jury's out on that.
00:36:08.079 --> 00:36:10.239
But nonetheless, um, yeah, but Sudeep, go ahead.
00:36:10.320 --> 00:36:12.960
And then if you want to talk about method, I'd love to hear about that.
00:36:13.280 --> 00:36:13.519
Yeah.
00:36:13.679 --> 00:36:16.800
So um, so I've I've written, so I do teach.
00:36:16.880 --> 00:36:19.360
I've been teaching, like I'm wrapping up my disc dissertations.
00:36:19.519 --> 00:36:28.559
I've been teaching a lot of classes around uh US Empire, uh Marxist uh theory, race and ethnicity, and Asian American history and politics.
00:36:28.719 --> 00:36:37.119
So, and those are important to me because the way I would teach it has changed a little bit in terms of how to formulate what I think students are missing from other classes around these subjects.
00:36:37.360 --> 00:36:45.440
Uh, there is sometimes a tendency or a conversation around race, gender, sexuality, however meaningful, that is still quite restrictive.
00:36:45.599 --> 00:36:58.639
Um, for instance, you're not going to hear a lot about people like Claudia Jones, who are quite instructive in terms of our history as people of color, who are quite radical, and she was a Marxist-Leninist from the 40s and 50s, and then she was deported to the UK.
00:36:59.119 --> 00:37:13.760
Uh, fun fact, she was not deported back to the Caribbean because they feared if she returned to uh, I think Trinidad, even though she was there as a little girl, she would actually be very, very she would crew she would be amazing at organizing people against the British.
00:37:13.840 --> 00:37:15.360
So they actually feared her that much.
00:37:15.440 --> 00:37:22.480
So they took her to uh the UK, where the British Communist Party was was really uh racist and sexist towards her.
00:37:22.559 --> 00:37:29.599
Um and she made uh Carnival, which is the biggest, second biggest carnival in the entire world, second to what happens in the Caribbean.
00:37:29.679 --> 00:37:30.719
So she's really dope.
00:37:30.960 --> 00:37:42.079
But um, but yeah, just really quickly, uh, I do a lot of also um public-facing work, which also does not get as this is also interesting, it doesn't get as respected in the fields, to be honest.
00:37:42.239 --> 00:37:49.199
Uh uh being able to write public-facing work is usually not seen as work, I have to be honest with you.
00:37:49.280 --> 00:37:51.760
So when Kevin reached out to me, it was quite validating.
00:37:51.920 --> 00:37:53.840
Um, so I really appreciate him doing that.
00:37:54.000 --> 00:37:56.559
Uh he just said, uh, dude, I like your work.
00:37:56.639 --> 00:37:58.159
Uh it was more formal than that.
00:37:58.239 --> 00:38:00.400
Uh but uh and I was like, oh shit.
00:38:00.480 --> 00:38:02.400
Like we already knew each other on Facebook.
00:38:02.559 --> 00:38:06.719
I knew of him through Ulsa Martina, and uh it was great.
00:38:06.880 --> 00:38:07.760
We just vibed.
00:38:07.840 --> 00:38:12.400
And when Mier came on the project, it was uh it was very interesting.
00:38:12.559 --> 00:38:14.639
Like all of our chemistry is just sort of worked.
00:38:14.800 --> 00:38:30.400
We I think we are all coming from a similar level of frustration on several levels, having to do with again, we're all interested in revolutionary thought, but what's positive as revolutionary is quite demeaning to that tradition, in my experience.
00:38:30.559 --> 00:38:34.719
And to your Foucault comment, and Kevin might laugh at this, I I hate Foucault.
00:38:34.880 --> 00:38:48.079
Um, I think he is a horrible person and a horrible theorist, and I think you can get a lot from other people because he was also terribly wrong on so many things, even in discipline and punishment.
00:38:48.239 --> 00:38:51.760
I know his whole evolution on prisons was quite inaccurate.
00:38:52.000 --> 00:39:06.079
Um, so I kind of hate his guts because in all the freaking classes I took, and I know this is PG PG 13, there would be so much critique about Marx, you know, as a man or as a white guy or something.
00:39:06.239 --> 00:39:16.400
But then there'd be like Foucault, who was this like white French guy who was like, power is everywhere, power is in your pinky, power is in your mind.
00:39:16.639 --> 00:39:19.840
A working class person is as powerful as a what is power?
00:39:20.000 --> 00:39:21.760
It's like, bro, we don't have power.
00:39:22.000 --> 00:39:24.239
And that's the that's the breaking point for me, was Foucault.
00:39:24.320 --> 00:39:28.480
So thank you, Foucault, for both not being around and also for pushing me in that direction.
00:39:28.639 --> 00:39:30.480
So I just wanted to add that really quickly.
00:39:30.639 --> 00:39:34.320
I can't stand that man's controversy abounds.
00:39:34.559 --> 00:39:35.440
Incredible.
00:39:35.679 --> 00:39:49.199
Yeah, I think it's it's funny because I remember when I, you know, we're sort of compelled to read Foucault if you're in any kind of humanities, any kind of soft science, quote unquote soft science, social science, or whatever.
00:39:49.360 --> 00:40:00.400
And I remember uh seeing some statistic that said Foucault was the most cited uh scholar in all social science research or or whatever.
00:40:00.639 --> 00:40:07.920
And that kind of blew my mind because I thought this is not accessible, you know, this is this is not clear.
00:40:08.079 --> 00:40:15.519
But then I realized as I developed politically, part of what this is is also obfuscating, right?
00:40:15.599 --> 00:40:40.320
This is also about, and I I do think, you know, I know Sudeep, you hate the guy, whatever, but I do think that what Foucault, he was an anti-Marxist, but he was also writing from a position of the Cold War, um, you know, and also this there were some people who were Marxists who were actually trying to hide it.
00:40:40.559 --> 00:40:54.239
What he did was also, I think, to go a little conspiracy brain here, capitalizing on the fact that there was an anti-Marx, there's an anti-communist current, you know, like sort of emanating everywhere, you know, sort of post-68, right?
00:40:54.320 --> 00:41:00.960
Like this was like a symptom of a kind of um failure, but also a symptom of academic fear.
00:41:01.119 --> 00:41:14.960
And actually, what you said, Kevin, about how teachers kind of digging into this fray method and standing back, fearing indoctrination, I think part of that is also fearing that you will be called an indoctrinator, right?
00:41:15.039 --> 00:41:21.360
That like educators themselves are considered to be a kind of enemy unless proven otherwise.
00:41:21.519 --> 00:41:26.480
And like all of these different kinds of coded ways that people talk about this stuff.
00:41:26.639 --> 00:41:34.400
I mean, I'm from, you know, an English, I double-majored in English and political science and undergrad, but then, you know, did my PhD in English.
00:41:34.559 --> 00:41:40.639
And it was about like sort of like interdisciplinary like law and society sort of stuff.
00:41:40.960 --> 00:41:45.119
Foucault is everywhere in that, and so is Derrida, and so is all of that.
00:41:45.360 --> 00:41:52.400
Um, only recently has Marxism been even allowed to really be given anything other than like a dismissal.
00:41:52.559 --> 00:41:59.360
I remember one time I in grad school I said, you know, this needs a Marxist framework to my advisor.
00:41:59.440 --> 00:42:00.400
She laughed at me.
00:42:00.639 --> 00:42:02.559
We were clearly not well matched.
00:42:02.880 --> 00:42:08.320
Like, no, I didn't like really read that until like pretty, pretty late, you know, and I was just like, well, I guess I'm stuck.
00:42:08.480 --> 00:42:15.199
But like she laughed as though it were like, I can't believe you would ever even like deign to say something like that.
00:42:15.280 --> 00:42:18.000
Like it was automatically um dismissed.
00:42:18.079 --> 00:42:25.280
And that was before I even like became kind of a hardcore, you know, like died in the wool Marxist, you know.
00:42:25.360 --> 00:42:42.480
It was just like this could benefit from this, and it was considered to be off the table genuinely from some who sank themselves deeply into the kind of Yale School of Theory, um, you know, hermeneutic method that was kind of more on the pomo side, as you, you know, kind of brought up.
00:42:42.639 --> 00:42:55.840
But then Foucault just being this like central figure of anything goes so long as you are, you know, acknowledge that you can't get outside of power or what have you.
00:42:57.360 --> 00:42:58.159
Absolutely.
00:42:58.320 --> 00:43:01.519
No, I just really briefly, I was just gonna say, like, I think I think that's absolutely right.
00:43:01.679 --> 00:43:07.840
I was gonna say that you can imprint on Foucault so many things because the other because of lack of clarity.
00:43:08.000 --> 00:43:14.320
And so it becomes a useful tool for graduate students who are sort of navigating their way through trying to understand theory.
00:43:14.559 --> 00:43:24.320
Foucault provides like a wide berth for you to uh sort of like attach your own sort of political theory to it, uh, and then you know, say that's Foucault, right?
00:43:24.400 --> 00:43:36.719
Um, and so that's the you know, there's a there's it's a way that like it lends itself to sophistry, and I and I and I appreciate you naming that because uh graduate students are actually absolutely pulled toward Foucault and away from Marxism.
00:43:36.880 --> 00:43:44.079
And I teach uh uh our PhD students um an introduction course on um critical social theory in ed.
00:43:44.639 --> 00:43:50.320
And I I am actively trying to get them away from Foucault, even as they're like, but we love him.
00:43:51.440 --> 00:43:55.039
I guess this I guess we know what our next article is about.
00:43:55.599 --> 00:44:01.360
Yeah, next several articles, because you mentioned in here you're gonna write a second article, and now they're Maybe a third in the works.
00:44:01.679 --> 00:44:08.880
I just add really quick, just about I know I'm kind of joking, but I'm not because I just wrote down Heidegger.
00:44:08.960 --> 00:44:15.280
Like there is something going on in our in our field that has a lot to do with what's mentioned in the piece.
00:44:15.360 --> 00:44:19.280
Because we're still what our research project is literally methodology.
00:44:19.440 --> 00:44:25.920
We look over several readers that are meant to teach us how to teach the students, usually undergrads.
00:44:26.000 --> 00:44:28.559
That's the main focus of our civic education.
00:44:28.880 --> 00:44:37.840
Exactly, civic education, and that's why we and we were interested in the subject from what we're all explaining because we saw little seeds of it, little nuggets here and there.
00:44:37.920 --> 00:44:40.800
So we ourselves wanted to see if that's really consistent.
00:44:41.039 --> 00:44:43.199
And it kind of was, which we'll get into, I'm sure.
00:44:43.280 --> 00:44:50.239
But I just want to add there is more room for Heidegger, more room for fascist aligned thinkers, too.
00:44:50.320 --> 00:44:55.519
So this project is not really just about taking on uh it's true pronged.
00:44:55.599 --> 00:44:59.280
Our project is really trying to take on uh two sides of the coin.
00:44:59.440 --> 00:45:04.880
One is the liberal side that is quite anti-Marxist and also yearning for an alternative speech.
00:45:04.960 --> 00:45:07.840
So that's why also in the readers, you'll see they mention Marx.
00:45:07.920 --> 00:45:16.800
So they're kind of like in their own contradiction, because they realize, I guess, mentally uh that they're reaching a wall and how liberalism can be sort of salvaged.
00:45:16.880 --> 00:45:37.280
But then the other side is this other element of you can mention Heidegger, you can mention Nietzsche, but if you mention Marx or you take Marx seriously, and not just Marx, but the Marxist tradition Claudio Jones, Lenin, uh various other thinkers, George Jackson, Asada Shakur, if you mention these people, you are definitely touching a Ron Herb.
00:45:37.360 --> 00:45:42.000
And then the third category, which we talk about at the end of the piece, which we'll get into, is US Empire.
00:45:42.400 --> 00:45:44.880
There is no conversation about US Empire.
00:45:45.039 --> 00:45:45.440
None.
00:45:45.679 --> 00:45:51.199
It's it's I think it's completely missing from any social justice analysis.
00:45:51.280 --> 00:46:06.960
And that's kind of uh one of the some of the reasons we wanted to do the project to whether or not test for if this is something that we're just seeing individually, or is this something really seen in some of the readers are actually organizing or encouraging educators to teach civic education in this way?
00:46:07.280 --> 00:46:07.519
Yeah.
00:46:07.760 --> 00:46:50.079
Teaching teachers how to um, you know, if you're not explicitly doing Foucault, you're kind of um, and I I think what you said, imprinting uh the normative framework into these, like, oh, well, this is interesting, like encouraging people to ask these questions, but always leading kind of back to individual choices, these kinds of um very state and like you know, stagnant forms of um democracy within the institutions that are considered to be, you know, relevant or or proper, um, and not, you know, really developing people's conceptions of change collectively, right?
00:46:50.159 --> 00:46:53.519
Or change like in these other avenues besides like the ballot box.
00:46:53.599 --> 00:47:21.280
And I wanna, I I do want to get into um the content here because one of the things that really drew me in um was the it's a it's a history I've heard before, but like the sort of anti-communist and cold war history of the social studies movement, because that's complicated by what had been um the progressive fight and the civil civil rights movement fight for high quality public education preparing students for democratic participation.
00:47:21.440 --> 00:47:27.119
For example, that's what the landmark case, Brown versus Board of Education, is supposedly kind of pointing towards, right?
00:47:27.199 --> 00:47:36.880
That you need to have um non-discrimination and um total integration of schools no more separate but equal because these are all democratic participants.
00:47:36.960 --> 00:47:38.320
So there's a lot of contradiction there.
00:47:38.400 --> 00:48:01.280
And I did notice that Derek Bell is cited in the work, and it's you know, Derek Bell is a huge person for me when I was doing my own research, in part because um his field critique of law um was also about this idea of um really only the benefits flowing from, you know, sort of the white side of the equation.
00:48:01.360 --> 00:48:04.719
How does this benefit, you know, sort of like white hegemony?
00:48:04.880 --> 00:48:08.800
I always like to say that Bell was probably a crypto-Marxist.
00:48:08.960 --> 00:48:23.519
Um people get shocked by that, but but a big part of what he talks about, right, is the faces at the bottom of the well and the way in which race is used to um, you know, essentially split the working class, which you mention in your own article here.
00:48:23.599 --> 00:48:26.960
I'm sure it's a very big part of all of your all's research.
00:48:27.039 --> 00:48:28.639
Um, it can't really be avoided.
00:48:28.800 --> 00:48:48.880
But I would like to talk about this the politics of this contradiction and like kind of what you see, because in a lot of ways, what we're talking about when we're criticizing sort of social studies or civic education is criticizing something that comes out of a progressive kind of impetus, right?
00:48:49.039 --> 00:49:07.920
Like, and also this is in the context of heavy critique and an attack on public education and um especially things that are considered quote unquote woke, or they mislabel it, they call it Marxist because you're saying this is not Marxist at all.
00:49:08.000 --> 00:49:14.000
This is in fact anti-Marxist, but it's it's kind of like uh a political quandary here.
00:49:14.159 --> 00:49:30.800
Like to the extent that we're we're actually all educators and interested in kind of getting at least some progressive or socialist thinking into the the minds of students to allow them to be able to become, you know, true political agents, right?
00:49:31.119 --> 00:49:33.360
Like, how do we how do we deal with that?
00:49:33.519 --> 00:49:35.199
I mean, I would like to hear what you think.
00:49:35.360 --> 00:50:05.440
This is not really a worked-out theory, it's just kind of more what comes out of your article because the study you guys do with the, you know, kind of six readers, you point out there are these patterns of pointing everyone back towards kind of the idea of good citizenship, democracy as um not collective, but rather, you know, kind of limited to individual choice and avoiding some topics altogether, or couching them in the past, right?
00:50:05.599 --> 00:50:18.559
Like couching any kind of like movement activism as like the past, as though, and and maybe you could speak about that too, um, and and kind of foreclosing the idea that this could be the future, right?
00:50:18.719 --> 00:50:30.559
That instead what we have is a liberal democracy and everyone should participate in it in their participatory way, which whatever that that happens to be, mostly just voting, right?
00:50:30.639 --> 00:50:33.199
Or like maybe making a good consumer choice.
00:50:33.440 --> 00:50:39.920
So altogether, like, you know, what's what were your you know, sort of thought processes about this?
00:50:40.159 --> 00:50:41.599
Because what are we gonna do?
00:50:41.760 --> 00:50:43.679
Throw away social studies, you know?
00:50:43.920 --> 00:50:48.000
Instead, you say political education, but how is that going to be received?
00:50:48.079 --> 00:50:52.559
You know, like how tell me about how is this gonna happen?
00:50:54.159 --> 00:50:56.880
I I can start uh unless either of you wanna talk.
00:50:57.039 --> 00:50:57.760
Uh yeah, sure.
00:50:57.840 --> 00:50:58.800
I'll start then.
00:50:59.199 --> 00:51:01.760
Um, yeah, I mean, uh, you know, here's what I'll say.
00:51:01.920 --> 00:51:06.239
Like, I I think literature in social studies ed is actually like quite expansive.
00:51:06.480 --> 00:51:30.960
Um and and even before I get there, like I'll say, like, I I'm under no illusions about like, you know, the institutions that we that we work for, uh, these like capitalist like uh sort of uh universities are gonna be interested in replacing uh this kind of hegemonic civic education framework with something that interrogates capitalism.
00:51:31.039 --> 00:51:33.840
But I do think it's important to raise the contradiction.
00:51:33.920 --> 00:51:56.800
Um and I think expose like what we've we expose in the text is that like what has been sort of operating clandestinely as like uh a neutral, politically neutral uh sort of framework for teaching about society and uh and and and political issues is actually not at all um neutral in it in it and it uh orients us toward a particular kind of like domesticated action.
00:51:56.960 --> 00:52:18.400
But what I'll say is I think uh, you know, people in social studies, and I and this is I'm gonna give some credit, people study how teachers teach, how they conceptualize issues, how you know they teach about issues, um and are usually reflecting on learning outcomes with students that like point to like the civic and political implications, right?
00:52:18.480 --> 00:52:25.360
And so social studies hasn't been avoiding this, uh, but like I said before, there's a there's a quite heavy like postmodern influence.
00:52:25.599 --> 00:52:42.559
Um, and you know, it's even like this sort of deeply theoretical work uh that raises ontological questions uh about issues in social studies ed uh and uh how we train uh folks uh is really couched in this framework around like that like embraces civic education.
00:52:42.800 --> 00:52:50.639
Um and so what we're doing in this this work is actually not super far removed from the kinds of work that folks have been doing in the field for a while.
00:52:50.880 --> 00:52:57.199
Um, you know, in the field we've been interrogating epistemology, uh practice of social studies, teacher ed.
00:52:57.599 --> 00:53:08.400
Um, and to the field's credit, it's really like pushed civic education to be more justice-oriented, you know, more intersectional, uh, you know, critical of white supremacy and patriarchy.
00:53:08.639 --> 00:53:18.400
Um but you know, what we do here that I think stands in like sharp contrast, uh, is that we read civic education specifically through the lens of Marxism.
00:53:19.360 --> 00:53:25.119
And so we're we're asking, even uh when it's at its most critical edge of conceptualization, what does it miss?
00:53:25.599 --> 00:53:27.440
What is it what is it obscure?
00:53:27.679 --> 00:53:33.840
Uh, you know, what what does it misrepresent about politics, particularly within the heart of global capital?
00:53:34.000 --> 00:53:46.079
Um and so it's civic education in some ways has evolved past the politically neutral neutrality uh, you know, on some issues and embraces like calls to racial justice reform and women's rights and immigrant rights or whatever.
00:53:46.239 --> 00:53:55.679
Um, it even sometimes embraces protest politics as a viable tactic to respond to inequalities.
00:53:55.920 --> 00:54:03.840
Uh but conceptually, civic education is never open to seriously critiquing capitalism or the contradiction of capitalist democracy.
00:54:04.000 --> 00:54:11.599
Uh it's not it's not seriously open to like radically restoring like sovereignty to indigenous people or building power for the working class.
00:54:11.840 --> 00:54:27.440
Um, understanding that even at its most critical edge, the project of civic education is engineering a commitment to progressive reform that's divorced from a critique of capitalism and the veneer of capitalist democracy as a vehicle for racial progress.
00:54:27.599 --> 00:54:32.400
And so it's a it's ultimately, you know, a tool for white supremacy and capitalism in that respect.
00:54:33.599 --> 00:54:36.320
Um I agree with all of that.
00:54:36.559 --> 00:54:44.639
Uh Michaela, I think your question is really good about the kind of contradiction or potential contradiction that the article points to.
00:54:45.119 --> 00:54:58.880
Um, we started working on this article and really like I think finished the article before the escalation of the current like right-wing fascist movement against DEI and everything it's associated with.
00:54:59.280 --> 00:55:08.079
Um, and when this all sort of blew up, I was kind of thinking, like, hmm, is now the moment for a critique of us.
00:55:09.679 --> 00:55:19.599
But I actually think it is um it because I think that the article provides a way of understanding how we got to this situation, right?
00:55:20.000 --> 00:55:27.760
Um if if I like I'm against the attack on DEI, as I assume we probably all are, right?
00:55:27.840 --> 00:55:36.400
Like it's important diversity, equity, and inclusion are important values to try to uphold in um in education.
00:55:36.719 --> 00:55:48.719
Um, we should teach about race, we should teach about um disability, we should teach about, you know, feminism and um gender equality, et cetera.
00:55:48.960 --> 00:55:54.800
But I think that DEI as a framework really bears the seeds of its own undoing.
00:55:55.119 --> 00:56:18.320
Um, if all we are if our analysis of racism and inequality is basically limited to the interpersonal and to also kind of essentialist assumptions about identity, then I think we're not equipped to actually redress racism and other forms of inequality in the academy or in society.
00:56:18.400 --> 00:56:30.960
Um and also we're then very susceptible to to kind of right-wing attacks on hip ho of like hypocrisy and insincerity um in the in the academy.
00:56:31.199 --> 00:56:44.880
Um and so, you know, you mentioned Michaela, the fact that that um, you know, Trump uh and his um supporters will sort of equate Marxism with liberal identity politics.
00:56:45.039 --> 00:56:48.320
And I think that's really interesting and instructive for the left, right?
00:56:48.480 --> 00:57:07.599
The fact that they can do that, that they can collapse Marxism and identity liberal identity politics, um, I think suggests that the that that socialists and the left have not done a great job of articulating the difference and offering an alternative to liberal identity politics.
00:57:07.840 --> 00:57:18.400
Um and um so you know, in terms of like what we should do, what can be done, um I think that students, you know, I think that we should have DEI initiatives.
00:57:18.480 --> 00:57:21.039
I think that's or maybe we, you know, reframed.
00:57:21.119 --> 00:57:25.840
And I think that students should also learn about the legal framework of the United States.
00:57:26.000 --> 00:57:28.880
Like I think students should know what the Constitution says, right?
00:57:28.960 --> 00:57:34.960
You should learn about um, you know, the the history of its of its formation and amendments, et cetera.
00:57:35.199 --> 00:57:42.960
But also as part of that education, students should be thinking about who the constitution was designed to serve, right?
00:57:43.039 --> 00:57:46.400
Like what interests is it fundamentally organized around?
00:57:46.559 --> 00:57:52.000
Um, what are the limitations of the our of the legal framework of this society?
00:57:52.159 --> 00:57:58.639
Um, why do we have the oldest constitution in the world that seems to be um kind of impossible to change?
00:57:58.880 --> 00:58:04.239
And what kind of power do um our students actually have access to, right?
00:58:04.320 --> 00:58:11.199
What kind of power in pursuing social change do working class people actually have access to, right?
00:58:11.280 --> 00:58:23.440
I think if we teach them that their power is principally or exclusively in within the political system and through the vote, uh like I think that that is doing them a great disservice.
00:58:23.519 --> 00:58:25.760
And I also think that it's disillusioning to students.
00:58:25.920 --> 00:58:28.719
I think they understand that that's not real power.
00:58:28.880 --> 00:58:44.159
Um, and I think they um understand that a kind of like nostalgic framework for thinking about civic education, the constitution, American politics is completely inadequate to making sense of the current moment.
00:58:48.320 --> 00:58:48.800
Yeah.
00:58:48.960 --> 00:58:57.280
Um I just want to so in the paper we did something that was quite simple but ended up with actually rather complex results.
00:58:57.519 --> 00:59:13.679
So for example, what we did was we go we went through six readers and we looked at key terms, um, including terms are usually like racism, white supremacy, uh sexism, and then we also added terms about labor unions and capitalism.
00:59:13.840 --> 00:59:24.960
And that's how we configured our results because what we found was there has been, rightfully so, an increase of focus on racism, uh sexism.
00:59:25.119 --> 00:59:30.559
Interesting enough, just want to add this really there, but but there wasn't any specifics also there.
00:59:30.719 --> 00:59:32.880
Like there wasn't a discussion about white supremacy.
00:59:33.039 --> 00:59:40.880
I think that terminology was almost missing from all the readers, except for one time when it was referring to Jewish folks.
00:59:41.119 --> 00:59:50.239
So it seemingly kind of gave the impression that the only group who are impacted by white supremacy are people who are Jewish, which was also quite odd.
00:59:50.480 --> 00:59:56.400
Um, but then on the political economy side, we found just a mishmash of things.
00:59:56.480 --> 01:00:12.320
So we did find uh, at least in the political science side, a discussion of global economy, but there was few discussions about global economy, and I'm doing um uh quotes here, uh, in relation to capitalism, which is part of the global economy.
01:00:12.480 --> 01:00:14.880
So this is where the results we found were quite complex.
01:00:15.039 --> 01:00:27.840
So, like what Kevin said, civic education in this day is not being taught as neutral, but it is being taught in a way that's still quite counter-insurgent or counter-revolutionary.
01:00:28.159 --> 01:00:38.559
And I think to what Nie is saying, and also part of what I'm thinking too, and all of us are thinking, is that in this project, what we're showing is you have two sides again of the same coin.
01:00:38.719 --> 01:00:51.840
You have a more conservative, right, right leaning, is putting it lightly, right, very right-wing version of civic education that hopes to say things like hierarchies, like uh racial and sexual hierarchy is good, it's natural.
01:00:52.079 --> 01:00:58.000
Um, you know, should you don't mention black or brown or Asian or woman in your research projects?
01:00:58.239 --> 01:01:07.039
Um, but then what we are also seeing is the other side of that coin, which is you can mention some of that, but there is a tipping point to how you want to describe these movements.
01:01:07.119 --> 01:01:15.519
Because what's interesting, we also saw uh terms like settler colonialism being mentioned, but they were also in reference to places abroad.
01:01:15.760 --> 01:01:20.159
So there was one part of some one of the readers that said New Zealand is settler colonial.
01:01:20.719 --> 01:01:25.599
So there was no mention of that to the United States, but it was to New Zealand.
01:01:25.679 --> 01:01:29.360
And interestingly enough, it was reduced to what Mia say to an interpersonal dynamic.
01:01:29.519 --> 01:01:38.880
So settler colonialism is now referred in these some of these readers, uh, but they still were saying to the educator, see it as discrimination.
01:01:39.280 --> 01:01:45.039
That's interesting because New Zealand also has some of the best rights for Native people.
01:01:45.119 --> 01:01:45.280
Right.
01:01:45.440 --> 01:01:52.960
Like it's yeah, so it's it's both like so far removed from the United States, but also just like historically so distinct.
01:01:53.360 --> 01:01:53.760
Exactly.
01:01:53.840 --> 01:02:06.639
And yeah, with the Maori people, and also it was just interesting exactly how they picked that place because there might be some more like students who are Maori in these classes because it's all about how the teachers should investigate these things in the classroom as well.
01:02:06.800 --> 01:02:08.079
But again, it was interpersonal.
01:02:08.159 --> 01:02:18.719
Like settler colonialism, you can address it not through land, not through anything material, but through maybe people getting to know each other, which is part of a step, but it's not the totality.
01:02:18.880 --> 01:02:20.880
So those are some of the complexities.
01:02:21.039 --> 01:02:25.360
So we're not saying that there isn't politics behind civic education anymore.
01:02:25.519 --> 01:02:30.719
It's just a certain kind of politics that's quite uh anti-material.
01:02:31.599 --> 01:02:54.800
Well, something really interesting that's coming to mind here too is that like the collapse of um the framework of race conscious admissions and affirmative action um the last couple of years, like I teach those cases, those um, you know, from Baki through like, you know, the Texas cases through the most recent ones with the SFFA.
01:02:55.199 --> 01:03:05.440
And one thing that needs to be kind of noted is that diversity became in some way more materialized with the Baki case.
01:03:05.519 --> 01:03:19.760
Um, this is from 1977, when they decided actually this will be good for people going into the job market to have diversity in education because they'll have encountered all these people from different places.
01:03:20.000 --> 01:03:27.760
And since colleges were, you know, now it's much more common for people to go to college, but in the 70s it was, you know, quarter of the population or so.
01:03:27.920 --> 01:03:37.119
These are going to be the managers, they're gonna be the leaders in the military, they're gonna be all of these different leaders in and captains of industry, supposedly.
01:03:37.360 --> 01:03:58.079
So therefore, to have diversity also means that they'll be better at this, they'll be better at managing people or commanding people, because that's what you know, people were thought of like, you know, if you're a college graduate, then you're going to be going into something that where you're going to be in charge of workers or, you know, some some uh version of worker.
01:03:58.320 --> 01:04:31.920
Um, and what's interesting to me about the you know contradictions and the things that you guys are sort of teasing out is that the education that people get is kind of like very much in in a training almost of like how you get along with other people, like in a what we would call a multiracial democracy, but for them it's more kind of like the field of humanity, kind of like, you know, like these encounters that you might end up finding uh applicable to your own like sort of self-development.
01:04:32.719 --> 01:04:33.039
Right.
01:04:33.280 --> 01:04:40.719
Yeah, etiquette or like a kind of like, oh, well, you know, if someone disagrees with you, like how do you know, how would you deal with it?
01:04:40.880 --> 01:04:44.800
You know, do you wouldn't want to like know how to like question or debate.
01:04:44.880 --> 01:04:54.960
Instead, you would just want to be tolerant or accepting on the basis of kind of these um, you know, watch words of don't be racist, don't be sexist or what have you.
01:04:55.119 --> 01:04:59.119
And I'm, you know, we're we're at an hour here.
01:04:59.280 --> 01:05:06.079
I think we could like probably talk about that entire thing like all together for another hour if we wanted to.
01:05:06.239 --> 01:05:12.960
Um, but I do think that in the the realm of what's possible, right?
01:05:13.119 --> 01:05:31.599
Like what is possible, what this application of political education could be, um, a power analysis of like how people really do relate to each other, it was broken open by the ease by which um DEI was able to be dismantled, right?
01:05:31.760 --> 01:05:50.400
And also the fact that you didn't see any corporations that supposedly were getting the benefits of all of this diversity being kind of like filtered up through the education system, fighting back um very hard on you know the fact that this was supposedly to the benefit of greater society.
01:05:50.719 --> 01:05:59.760
I I could I should just say that for a while I've been thinking, and I presented at a Lawn Society conference a a few years ago about writing a longer article about decommodifying.
01:06:00.239 --> 01:06:01.039
diversity.
01:06:01.199 --> 01:06:12.639
You know, that that is like a like so a socialist view of diversity should be about, you know, this is about like human flourishing and the human experience.
01:06:13.039 --> 01:06:24.480
And please go ahead and diversity, democracy, like they're all socialism because they've been so associated with capitalist imperialism.
01:06:25.280 --> 01:06:26.639
And that's a huge problem.
01:06:26.960 --> 01:06:34.159
Like what it would have like to have an active divide meaning activity and program.
01:06:34.639 --> 01:06:35.039
Yeah.
01:06:35.280 --> 01:06:45.199
Something you said at the socialism conference, um, which was I thought really great because we, you know, it was kind of under this idea of like, is there a socialist humanism that we can like retrieve?
01:06:45.280 --> 01:07:02.320
And you're like, humanism is actually kind of like a problematic word in you know politics, you know, like anthropocentrism or like this kind of like human-centered thing, obviously then there's this automatic or at least we're used to an automatic kind of exclusion, like who gets counted or something like that.
01:07:02.480 --> 01:07:13.280
But I think that this what you're just saying goes right along with that, which is what would it mean to have socialist diversity that isn't just a rehash of the stuff that has been taken away from us?
01:07:13.440 --> 01:07:31.280
What would it mean to actually transform this concept or to look back to some of our, you know, our socialist um you know forefathers, for example, uh Dewey wrote about diversity in education a long time ago, but he's been completely like washed out.
01:07:31.440 --> 01:07:41.840
And it's um you know I'm I'm excited to think about that stuff, but it does kind of like hit on like the what is to be done question, I think, pretty hard.
01:07:42.000 --> 01:08:12.400
So to say like the so this is the thing like for us for me at least for this project it's it is about questioning that approach but it's also about exposing how these institutions and how some people who teach in these institutions have not saying they weren't sincere but in some instances like at least with the administrations right at various universities how quickly they've given up on these fights to Trump just exposing they never cared.
01:08:12.639 --> 01:08:24.479
Because I'll say personally as a person of color following the George Floyd death and then the protest there was a little bit of a moment in political science of diversity and pushing for that even more.
01:08:24.720 --> 01:08:32.479
But even then it was quite calculating in my view and also very precarious to use a Kevin's term for something else.
01:08:32.560 --> 01:08:41.760
Like it was very obvious to me that some of it was just about like there were there were terms like I support but for instance I just want to say like the framing would be like this.
01:08:41.920 --> 01:08:54.399
So instead of I mean you can still say decolonize the syllabus which is important but something I kept bringing up to a lot of my peers many of them white was what we're doing is not just decolonizing.
01:08:54.560 --> 01:09:30.399
What we're doing is actually providing real history like for instance like how do you talk about the expansion of the Supreme Court without talking about the expansion of stealing of land because a lot of the Supreme Court cases had a lot to in the early decades having to do with justifying these weird uh uh uh you know relationships and contradictions between the US proper and these so-called independent nations which then were also meant to be dependent basically colonized so that was a big part of the Supreme Court so for those people liberals or conservatives who teach law in that way they're not teaching law they're teaching lies.
01:09:30.800 --> 01:09:41.680
What what we're trying to suggest and what we're trying to say that what we would like to see is a real history which is tending towards materialism and socialism but nonetheless is a reality.
01:09:41.920 --> 01:09:46.159
So those are those are the type of examples I would see in terms of framing and reframing.
01:09:46.239 --> 01:10:02.640
And then about what to do um I personally don't think this article really contends with that because that would be a whole other article what it what I would suggest to anyone is a still join an org to talk about this with more people if you're an educator.
01:10:02.720 --> 01:10:05.920
So be part of your union grad or late your faculty.
01:10:06.159 --> 01:10:12.159
But also just be the be one of those people just aware of what's what your students are bringing into the classroom.
01:10:12.319 --> 01:10:23.359
That's the other thing like if someone was to read this and they're like a colleague of mine, I would just like for them to just know and be like, oh interesting I didn't realize this is some of what they might bring into the classroom with me.
01:10:23.520 --> 01:10:28.319
And I think that's just the small end version of what a person can quote unquote do.
01:10:28.479 --> 01:11:28.720
But until we have like a revolutionary party and until we have organic intellectuals mixing it up relationally with these parties I think it's still going to be a tough swap for any one individual to sort of contend with what does it do what does it do question um of like revolutionizing the academy um we we are all teachers you know and hopefully every a lot of people who are hopefully a lot of uh teachers will read our article and um and it is you know I'm thinking about these pedagogical choices all the time right like how am I how am I positioning myself um in the classroom?
01:11:28.880 --> 01:11:37.840
Like am I actually um you know kind of centering power and power analysis in the way that I teach about politics, you know?
01:11:38.560 --> 01:11:52.479
And I think that you know pedagogically like we're all you know able to make choices about um about you know what what kind of history we teach to Sadi's point, what conceptions of democracy we offer students, right?
01:11:52.560 --> 01:12:08.079
Like do we present or do we just you know we can very easily um it's almost very difficult not to default to an understanding of democracy as synonymous with the American political system and America as synonymous with democracy.
01:12:08.239 --> 01:12:14.720
And I think that's that that concept of democracy does so much ideological work that is rarely interrogated.
01:12:14.880 --> 01:12:22.239
So even just like framing to students like what is meant by democracy in this context and what do you think of that?
01:12:22.399 --> 01:13:10.880
Like that's I've done that and it's been like very illuminating and interesting um I think we have a responsibility as educators not to set our students up for political disillusionment and apathy because if we lie to them or if we you know if we give them these kind of like nostalgic and dishonest you know representations of our history and of you know the kind of um foundations of the American political system, they will understand that that is you know I think it's to the point about DEI, it's like very disillusioning I think to a lot of our students to see the way that the universities and other institutions have completely backed off of those commitments.
01:13:11.279 --> 01:13:22.960
And I think it makes them feel like disillusioned with themselves as well and with the kind of you know commitments and that they espoused you know in 2020 or 2021.
01:13:23.439 --> 01:13:33.119
And something I've found myself saying to students is like well it's very painful to believe something and not to be able to enact it right in the world.
01:13:33.199 --> 01:13:39.439
And that can lead us to the can to just abandon the belief or the commitment right or the analysis.
01:13:39.920 --> 01:13:49.680
But that's not that's not you know that's not the only way to go right um but then they need tools for actually understanding how could we change society?
01:13:49.840 --> 01:14:03.199
Like how could we actually redress structural racism um and inequality um in order for them not to just become politically apathetic.
01:14:03.920 --> 01:14:04.319
Yeah.
01:14:04.560 --> 01:17:17.920
I what I just want to say something because I I'm and I'm uh at the risk of like bringing us back to something we've already covered in the uh some of what uh I think and actually think this is important so I'll just say it I I don't think that the civic education that readers at least in the social studies field uh is engaged in or at least trying to socialize students uh pre-service students to embrace is is actually like the kind of like banal like stuff that like some of the some of the older like uh readers might have uh embraced it's not like just saying like hey go vote and be a good person I think it's actually doing something a bit more insidious and I think what that that thing is is uh something that like all of us have spoken to at this point is doing this really uh interesting sometimes partial sometimes you know uh uh some sometimes critical uh uh a sort of conceptualization of like problems in the society so for instance you might see um you know uh a uh a reader discuss something like undocumented citizen uh undocumented folks' rights and and injustices they experience right and I think that's like that that's an interesting thing right in it in it and it positions the reader to be uh uh uh the the reader as in the the text uh to be like uh sort of embraced as like a sort of progressive text the the sleight of hand though is that what it what it often does encourages you to do like and so it embraces like a sort of critical take on these things but the sleight of hand is that it encourages you to think about these issues as disconnected from um political economy and to understand not just uh in and even if it like so yes it it it does ask folks to sort of think about like what their own sort of individual level of participation will be uh you know around uh these issues but it but it also it also you know the one reader uh I think the 2021 social studies reader uh which I think had an sort of uh an explicitly um you know uh critical framing I can't remember the title of that one um but it it was it was like you know uh it it it you know was encouraging about like protest politics right and so like there there are these like really interesting ways that like these readers are asking people to do more than the banal like sort of civic participation stuff but it's but it's always disconnect it's it is never for asking them to question the uh structural the structures and relationships to uh our our relationship to to uh labor our relationship to capital our relationship to uh capitalist democracy all of those things are off the table for for question and critique and so you the the the most you can do is think about like you know why these things are problems and to get together with some people and like express your grievance about these issues and then that is and that's that's it right and that's that's sort of like where we're that's those are the tools we're sort of left with to sort of think about like our way out of these things.
01:17:18.720 --> 01:18:10.079
So it's it's it it it does this really good job of like and I think I see this with my students um and I teach mostly like PhD and EDD students there is they they are really bereft of of of an of an analysis of social change that doesn't include like that that that isn't like super individualist um you know like teachers who are like you know I'm just gonna go in a classroom and I'm gonna teach these issues uh that we're talking about in class and I'm like yeah that's great and I think I think that that's actually wonderful but like what what does it look like for you to organize with your your teacher peers to do so like to to sort of make a structural intervention or what does it look like for you to organize with the community and the students to sort of impose like you know to build power to impose uh a curriculum and impose like a mandate around teaching some of these things like that's that's what I'm what I'm trying to get you to do.
01:18:10.159 --> 01:18:23.439
And I think civic education does not offer young people uh a framework to think about things in that way because it's it's it's always asking them to participate in the in the in the sort of given democratic process uh as it exists.
01:18:23.840 --> 01:18:33.439
Yeah and I think the issue thing you're saying just reminds me of the sort of Solinsky method of community organizing where everything is around like people's one issue.
01:18:33.600 --> 01:18:42.720
Like what is the issue that you care about and are going to invest yourself in rather than making these issues actionable and organizing around them.
01:18:42.880 --> 01:18:47.439
Instead it's about advocacy right like or like the most you can do is advocacy.
01:18:47.520 --> 01:19:05.600
And I was just going to say Kevin that it's interesting you mentioned 2021 reader having this part where it says protest is good because they would have been missing completely if they had not put that in there because the George Floyd protests and Black Lives Matter happened the year before.
01:19:05.680 --> 01:19:33.920
And I remember when that happened and it was you know during the pandemic everyone was like what can we teach in order to address this right and I actually started teaching a course that I'd already had been thinking about called police power that sort of related both to COVID as well as you know the protests that were happening and it was you know through a Marxist critique of power but also kind of like a survey course about the concept of police power in the United States.
01:19:34.079 --> 01:19:36.960
But everyone was like looking to be like, oh this will be popular.
01:19:37.119 --> 01:19:39.439
This will be the thing that like hooks the students.
01:19:39.680 --> 01:20:03.039
And I think that for political education what we want to do is um give people the tools to be able to essentially create participation within their own development and education and consciousness rather than just being like entertained or otherwise you know kind of like ah yes I have just inculcated some knowledge into myself and now I have built myself, right?
01:20:03.119 --> 01:20:18.159
It's more kind of like what does it do to actually give people the ability to um participate deeply in their own education and part of this is about asking questions that then get people in connection with each other, right?
01:20:18.319 --> 01:20:31.760
To um think about like who could I talk to about this who'd be who want to make this issue actionable with me and actually like work on it together and like make it into something more to try to change things, right?
01:20:32.000 --> 01:20:37.359
Because I think that what you say in your article is about like social change, but there's no content given, right?
01:20:37.439 --> 01:20:43.279
It's like the individual it's up to the individual to like figure out like what their limit is for social change.
01:20:43.359 --> 01:20:56.159
And usually it's like voting maybe going to a protest um you know maybe getting an internship at like you know uh some like washperger or like you know one of the perks or something like that.
01:20:56.479 --> 01:21:04.079
What it I do think they give some actionable items but it's very messy and muddled.
01:21:04.319 --> 01:21:14.000
So like the disconnect part that Kevin talked about is the is really very intentional right so you kind of have to piece things together a lot.
01:21:14.159 --> 01:21:26.720
And obviously the main thing is to say to student because they do mention right wing populism in the other reader as being the problem then it sort of disappears from the rest of the text so they are they're trying to touch things to make them seem relevant.
01:21:27.039 --> 01:22:01.199
So I think these readers also reflect a lot of the contradictions of our fields and the contradictions are emerging from class contradictions racial but also empire I I keep relating because for for instance um and actually going because I want to say something about Palestine but before that political education's purpose is about yes um getting people actionable but it's also like I kind of mentioned before it's about teaching clarity like actual stuff like I want all of us to position ourselves as the real people who know what people need to know.
01:22:01.439 --> 01:22:31.439
Because even if like at the end of our article we talked about briefly what a political education program would look like and we do say that even if you're a student who's not a Marxist, this is not just meant for everyone who's a Marxist obviously we'd prefer if everyone was but let's say you are a student involved in just getting your rent reduced the way that civic education would position that in the American context is to lobby your politician your city council to go to New Brunswick City Council.
01:22:31.600 --> 01:22:34.640
What we are saying is that that's not objectively true.
01:22:34.960 --> 01:23:07.840
Objectively you would need to go to or you need to know who your enemy is and your enemy is not just the politician it's the developers behind them who may have other sessions during the week that you're not part of so even if your if your mindset's not revolutionary you still need to know thy enemy right you need to know the the the the actual political landscape and civic education however meaningful the people are because I'm not arguing again that they're insincere it's not it's not giving the right clarity to students to really activate even on the liberal end what they need to do.
01:23:07.920 --> 01:23:16.159
So advocacy to your point they're actually teaching their students to advocate for sure but even on the smaller things they need to advocate for they're giving them the wrong analysis.
01:23:16.399 --> 01:23:28.880
Like even if you care about racial discrimination which I do you're not going to get far just by lobbying the administration of a university without realizing that administration is also beholden to other interests.
01:23:29.039 --> 01:23:36.640
So that's kind of what I think political education should be doing which is clarifying the actual political landscape that people are in.
01:23:37.359 --> 01:23:37.920
Yeah.
01:23:38.319 --> 01:23:44.159
And I just I think it's a form of in in it it's a form of diseducation or miseducation.
01:23:45.359 --> 01:27:20.079
I think what we're talking about with political education is actually the kind of work that we need to do to overcome the propagandized forms of education about our society that civic education inheres uh most of the time young people who are talking about like uh how to change things in it in at least in my our uh in my classes uh are like have a really limited framework for thinking about change and and it's not at all a an accident or a coincidence right I mean you know every every semester everyone has this dramatic awakening they had no idea there were banana wars they have no idea that that you know United Fruit Company existed uh and it still exists as Chiquita Banana and you know is uh responsible for some of like the the most horrific uh uh um you know uh uh crimes against humanity in uh Latin America and these are and and these are people who have been in the field teaching as social studies educators or it's teaching uh um elementary school students uh for for decades right and so and so there is there is also an a an a a matter that like naming accurately like what we're up against not just uh like a like a sort of uh a banal or uh uh uh toothless form of uh of education about society it's actually one that is depoliticizes and is asking people to be more domesticated in their in their um engagement with like the the the you know horrific things that like happen under capitalism colon colonialism yeah I think domesticated is a an a great word because part of this is also turning students into obedient participants in capitalism um since we're all college level educators you know what we see often are students who have aspirations to you know not be part of the quote unquote middle class which we know doesn't exist right but also to not be you know somebody who who's who's precarious right like who who who wants to like have a life and and everything and I think that what what you were saying um about the insidiousness of of this and and and it's also like let's be let's be frank they're struggling to get it past the censors you know it's not like these books can just like be put out and you know with uh with the message when they're being put through you know it's a it's a whole industry you know textbooks are a whole industry and um they're responsive right to like the market and they're trying to sell to as many uh schools as they can and all and all of that but as educators you know when we're thinking about what could we do to also um supplement these things with some you know some synthesis right like what what are the kinds of things that we can kind of pull out because you know one of my um adjectives I describe myself as I'm an eclectic Marxist you know like I don't just deny the worth of like you know lots of theory um because it doesn't happen to be Marxist or maybe it's an anti-Marxist but part of the skill one of the key skills I would say maybe the the ultimate skill is teaching students how to do synthesis without then becoming relativist right like without then becoming you know kind of what you said Mia is disillusioned but I would say even like disillusionment can sometimes lead to radicalism, right?
01:27:20.159 --> 01:27:29.439
If you're like if you really hit rock bottom but disillusionment can also just get to like oh well I guess I can't do anything and like I'm just gonna follow along now.
01:27:30.159 --> 01:27:30.399
Yeah.
01:27:30.560 --> 01:27:51.760
Anyway it was an excellent article and um I just wanted to ask before we wrap up is there anything that you can suggest on um what you'd recommend to people listening if they'd like to learn more that's not about the article or something that is more accessible if you're not part of an um an academic community that you would say like you know kind of hits on some of these ideas?
01:27:52.720 --> 01:27:55.119
I would say read's new book.
01:27:55.520 --> 01:28:02.720
I was gonna say just out with with um uh university University of what's it called, Kevin?
01:28:04.000 --> 01:28:05.039
Oh yeah, go for it, Kevin.
01:28:05.119 --> 01:28:06.159
You entered me.
01:28:09.840 --> 01:28:16.239
Yeah, this is this is not a video podcast, but uh I guess this is activism, youth political education, and free market common sets.
01:28:16.640 --> 01:28:17.279
Excellent, excellent.
01:28:17.439 --> 01:28:19.520
We'll put a link to that in the the show notes.
01:28:19.600 --> 01:28:23.199
Um, but anything else um that folks should read?
01:28:23.520 --> 01:28:37.359
You could also read Sudeep's or listen all read and listen to Sudeep's um public-facing work, but lots of really excellent podcast interviews that touch on a lot of the themes of the article.
01:28:39.760 --> 01:28:41.359
Sudeep has too many to list.
01:28:42.079 --> 01:28:43.279
Yeah, I guess.
01:28:43.520 --> 01:28:45.039
Um I'm trying to think.
01:28:45.199 --> 01:28:48.800
Well, I'm also I just wanted to bring up one last thing to be annoying, which is related to the book.
01:28:48.880 --> 01:28:58.239
I know this is not a video podcast, but uh I would recommend, because this is also free, Ghassan Khanafani's uh The Revolution of 36 to 39 in Palestine.
01:28:58.479 --> 01:29:08.079
Um the I just want to add the thing about this article that's important is because we were correct on this one very fundamental thing, which was kind of wave through.
01:29:08.319 --> 01:29:15.199
Uh regardless of the era, whether it's been pre or post-Trump, there isn't any discussion about a US empire.
01:29:15.680 --> 01:29:16.960
I I keep repeating that.
01:29:17.119 --> 01:29:20.880
And the main contradiction I've seen with my students is Palestine.
01:29:21.119 --> 01:29:38.079
So a lot of my students are coming to class feeling a little bit confused because they're seeing all the images of people being burnt alive, killed by the Israelis and the Zionists, but then no one brings it up, which is its own form of weird gaslighting and psychosis that's created for them.
01:29:38.319 --> 01:29:49.439
And they tell me that because I asked, I have I have been taking more of a insistent approach, let's say, on really naming the names, meaning like this is wrong, this is a genocide, blah, blah, blah.
01:29:49.520 --> 01:29:50.399
There's no two sides to it.
01:29:50.479 --> 01:29:52.640
Like to your point, there's no relativism.
01:29:52.960 --> 01:29:57.199
But I do often offer them articles about how to get how we got here.
01:29:57.359 --> 01:30:00.159
I go through the UN website, things are seen as objective.
01:30:00.239 --> 01:30:06.800
But I just want to say, in our in our article, we mentioned how US empire is not named ever.
01:30:07.199 --> 01:30:12.399
The only time there's any discussion about empire, it's always like China, bizarrely, which is bullshit.
01:30:12.720 --> 01:30:22.239
And then when it comes to Palestine, you can find exactly what we're describing in this article with us today, which is progressive or liberal, except for Palestine.
01:30:22.560 --> 01:30:31.600
We have a genocide going on, but I have all my students keep saying there's no one else in a lot of the departments having to do with social science, bringing up anything.
01:30:31.760 --> 01:30:39.279
And when Ukraine was invaded, I remember distinctly political scientists rushing to now name the name of colonialism.
01:30:39.520 --> 01:30:43.920
And so I want to refer to Ghassan Khanafani because he was a co-founder of PFLP.
01:30:44.079 --> 01:30:51.279
He was assassinated by the Israelis along with his niece, who I think was 17 years old, and he has a lot of amazing work, which is actually quite accessible.
01:30:51.439 --> 01:30:54.640
Um, so one of it is the revolution of 36 to 39.
01:30:54.800 --> 01:30:57.840
And I just wanted to mention that because I still feel suffocated.
01:30:58.000 --> 01:31:06.800
Like I am always paranoid teaching about Palestine because I feel like that's the that's the other red line that's kind of intimated in art.
01:31:07.119 --> 01:31:11.760
It's dangerous, and it's dangerous for those of us of color, all of whom are here talking about it.
01:31:11.920 --> 01:31:23.840
Mia, Kevin, and I like we do feel a sense of like people will also assume things about us off rip, which kind of weirdly pushes us to that decision-making part.
01:31:24.159 --> 01:31:28.079
But there's a lot of people of color, white and people of color, who've not broached this issue.
01:31:28.319 --> 01:31:32.479
And I think it's uh it also tells you again how civic education is a lie.
01:31:32.720 --> 01:31:45.520
If you don't talk about Palestine, you are lying to your students and you're preparing them for a future in which they're just gonna be, to Nier's point, quite confused and dispassionate because internally they know something is going on, but they're being told to not care.
01:31:45.600 --> 01:31:47.680
And then finally, one of my students did bring up Epstein.
01:31:47.760 --> 01:31:49.760
A lot of my students did bring up Epstein a lot.
01:31:50.319 --> 01:31:52.880
And again, I asked them, do people bring it up?
01:31:52.960 --> 01:31:55.920
And they say no, and then they tell me like it just feels weird.
01:31:56.079 --> 01:31:58.239
Yeah, so reality is sorted.
01:31:58.319 --> 01:31:59.520
I mean, that's part of it too.
01:31:59.680 --> 01:32:20.560
It's like it's like a really gross and sorted thing to talk about, and students also um might not know how to talk about it in terms of uh political ruling class connected to capital because it is like obviously very creepy, conspira like conspiracy laden and all of this stuff.
01:32:20.720 --> 01:32:35.119
And I would say if I were a teenager who has not been prepared well to kind of like interrogate these things, I would feel embarrassed and like un and and like feel like I'm like, how do I talk about this without sounding like some kind of pervert?
01:32:35.600 --> 01:32:36.319
You know, yeah.
01:32:36.560 --> 01:32:53.279
I bring it up because one of my students, I was asking them something to do with just general politics, and one of them brought it up and said, she said, how it just reinforced what she was thinking and how it just made her mind basically melt because it was just so, like you said, sorted.
01:32:53.520 --> 01:32:57.279
But also the language of power in politics, it's there, attempted.
01:32:57.359 --> 01:32:58.880
Like I'm talking about social science.
01:32:58.960 --> 01:33:01.039
If you're in STEM, you know, whatever.
01:33:01.119 --> 01:33:03.279
Do I this is also just my take on STEM.
01:33:03.520 --> 01:33:05.199
God, you know, God bless you.
01:33:05.359 --> 01:33:05.840
You're great.
01:33:06.000 --> 01:33:06.880
STEM is amazing.
01:33:06.960 --> 01:33:09.039
They're they're the only field that matters, apparently.
01:33:09.279 --> 01:33:11.199
So anyway, so just whatever.
01:33:11.279 --> 01:33:13.359
Just like, you know, God bless, not a chef's kiss.
01:33:13.520 --> 01:33:21.359
But all I'm saying is that they bring it up because there's a tension between the reality of what they're living and a tension between what they're supposed to be thinking.
01:33:21.439 --> 01:33:22.239
And one last thing.
01:33:22.399 --> 01:33:29.439
We're also pushing against the idea of lived experience to Kevin and Nia's earlier point of view about Freire, F that.
01:33:29.760 --> 01:33:32.239
There's always been revolutionaries who said you need to read.
01:33:32.560 --> 01:33:36.560
I'm sorry, as a person of color, there is a ceiling to what I knew.
01:33:36.880 --> 01:33:45.600
I I was an Obama person because I was saying, okay, I elect somebody, he's gonna do the thing, and he also knows about Hindus and Muslim folks, which I'm growing up.
01:33:45.840 --> 01:33:53.279
I learned through reading, this is an recycled process of trying to get us away from other alternatives.
01:33:53.359 --> 01:34:00.399
So reading is important, lived experience, Kukodian logic is limited on purpose.
01:34:00.720 --> 01:34:04.880
Not everything you learn is gonna come from your personal conviction.
01:34:04.960 --> 01:34:14.720
You're gonna have to read and learn collectively and go to amazing professors like Kevin and Mie, who are going to, you know, give you stuff that's difficult, and that's okay.
01:34:14.880 --> 01:34:20.079
Yeah, and me, which I'm just gonna be ranting about Foucault every single class, like Foucault, whatever, or Heidegger.
01:34:20.239 --> 01:34:23.520
But I'm just saying, me, Kevin and Mie are amazing scholars, and that's the other thing.
01:34:23.600 --> 01:34:28.800
Like, this is about scholarship, and we're losing that with these sort of civic education trainings as well.
01:34:28.960 --> 01:34:30.720
Sorry, I just couldn't help myself with that.
01:34:31.039 --> 01:34:32.079
I just want to add one thing.
01:34:32.159 --> 01:34:33.680
I am Sudeep.
01:34:33.840 --> 01:34:35.840
Um reading is fundamental.
01:34:36.000 --> 01:34:37.439
Let's be let's be totally clear.
01:34:37.600 --> 01:34:39.920
This is a reading yes podcast.
01:34:40.159 --> 01:34:56.720
Yeah, we have to we have to learn and we have to change um in order to have um, you know, have have uh be equipped to, you know, to actually try to um make this society less depraved.
01:34:57.039 --> 01:35:11.039
Um but I wanted to just also add as a recommendation, yeah, to Sidip's point about Palestine and its the effect on students of the silence, silence and silencing around Palestine and the academy, um, to democra to the point concept of democracy.
01:35:11.119 --> 01:35:19.279
I mean, I've been I've been teaching this like um required class at BARD that's all about like American democracy, which is why I'm talking so much about American democracy.
01:35:19.439 --> 01:35:22.640
But what a contradiction that they're living through, right?
01:35:22.880 --> 01:35:33.760
There's like over there has been for a very long time overwhelming, you know, public support for a ceasefire, and yet the genocide continues with our tax dollars, right?
01:35:34.079 --> 01:35:41.520
Um, the war in on Iran is compl is not popular at all with any part of the American public, and yet it continues unabated.
01:35:41.760 --> 01:35:46.880
And so, you know, if we we have it's just like you said about like being speaking the truth, right?
01:35:46.960 --> 01:35:48.960
Like speaking to reality, right?
01:35:49.119 --> 01:35:56.479
Like that in what what concept of democracy do you need to have to call this society a democracy while those things are happening, right?
01:35:56.640 --> 01:36:05.520
There is no alignment between there's a this is like a 2014 study that I keep citing, but I wish they would do it again so it could be more um more credible.
01:36:05.680 --> 01:36:19.439
But there was this study by two um in Perspectives on Politics by two uh like Princeton political scientists about the relationship between people's policy preferences and policy outcomes in the United States.
01:36:19.600 --> 01:36:30.880
And they found that there's no correlation between ordinary people's policy preferences and policy outcomes from Congress, but there is a positive correlation between elite policy preferences and policy outcomes, right?
01:36:31.039 --> 01:36:34.880
So it's just like, you know, when we're talking about democracy, like let's start there, right?
01:36:35.119 --> 01:36:44.159
Um, and on that point, one reading suggestion, Jodie Dean's like pretty old book, um, Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies.
01:36:44.560 --> 01:36:45.920
Um, it's very provocative.
01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:48.800
I'm trying to, you know, I'm trying to figure out what I think about democracy.
01:36:49.039 --> 01:36:49.920
Well, it's Jody Dean.
01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:50.560
She's provocative.
01:36:51.600 --> 01:36:52.239
And I love that.
01:36:52.399 --> 01:36:53.199
I love that about her.
01:36:53.359 --> 01:37:11.600
But the chapter on democracy, I think, is like the best thing I've read, really kind of um um interrogating the meaning of democracy and posing the question of like, is this a recoverable concept, given the ends to which it's been put specifically by US imperialism?
01:37:11.760 --> 01:37:21.520
So I think that that's just a great um place to start in thinking um critically about the discourse of uh political science and civic education.
01:37:21.920 --> 01:37:44.479
Yeah, on that, and just to sort of wrap things up, I also think the point you made about the fact that policy outcomes and policy preferences are so far apart, this should actually be very encouraging for socialists because while we're constantly being told people will not accept socialism, people won't no, that's actually not true because working class people have an interest, right?
01:37:44.640 --> 01:38:07.439
Like they have a very a set of very um clear common interests and um you know political priorities that are uh denied to them, um, both through the education that they they are are served up, right, through through the schools, as you guys like it sort of um pull out, and also through these kinds of you know, uh media machinations.
01:38:07.520 --> 01:38:21.119
And and the thing is, is that a lot of us, you know, who are both organizers and educators, I find that my organizing and my educating go hand in hand and they kind of like play off of each other and learn from each other, right?
01:38:21.279 --> 01:38:26.640
I've become a better organizer because of my uh the fact that I'm an educator and vice versa.
01:38:26.880 --> 01:38:39.840
And so much of this is also about pulling people closer to the truth, even if it takes longer than one conversation, and it certainly isn't necessarily the case that you can just tell somebody something and they believe it.
01:38:40.000 --> 01:39:05.039
But part of this is also about giving people the agency or showing people how they can, how they can gain the agency to question the world that they live in and direct it towards their interests and those of other people and finding commonality in others, which is, I think, part of this diversity, you know, like what it could mean to have a sort of socialist reclamation of diversity.
01:39:05.199 --> 01:39:09.840
It's like, what is the difference between diversity and just celebrating difference?
01:39:10.000 --> 01:39:13.840
Well, diversity is also about the world we actually live in.
01:39:14.079 --> 01:39:16.640
The fact that this is the world we really live in.
01:39:16.800 --> 01:39:19.279
Not, you know, people are not uniform, right?
01:39:19.439 --> 01:39:26.319
People do not have, you know, are not monoliths, uh, racial groups are not monoliths, women are not monoliths, these people, you know, we're not monoliths.
01:39:26.399 --> 01:39:30.560
What we are, though, are people who have the power of language.
01:39:30.800 --> 01:39:36.800
We have the power of communication, we have the power of of being part of a society, right?
01:39:36.960 --> 01:39:39.119
And how do we, how do we shape that?
01:39:39.439 --> 01:39:42.079
Um, being honest with each other, really.
01:39:42.239 --> 01:39:53.199
Like I found that in organizing and in in education, students and people who are just on the doors appreciate it when you are direct with them and you're not trying to manipulate them, right?
01:39:53.279 --> 01:39:55.920
And they're you're not trying to politics them, right?
01:39:56.079 --> 01:39:57.600
And you're speaking to their interests.
01:39:57.760 --> 01:40:18.000
And I think that this is, you know, this has been a great conversation just about like what that looks like from uh an education point of view, from like what it really means to provide a comprehensive and and uh grounded civic education that directs people towards like what do you really think about this, right?
01:40:18.079 --> 01:40:22.159
Like what like what and what are the ways that you feel empowered and not disillusioned?
01:40:22.399 --> 01:40:23.600
So we'll end it there.
01:40:23.680 --> 01:40:28.399
And I just want to thank all of you, Mia, Sudeep, and Kevin, for joining us today.
01:40:28.720 --> 01:40:29.359
Thank you.
01:40:29.680 --> 01:40:31.119
Thank you so much for having us.
01:40:31.279 --> 01:40:36.399
This was really um interesting and yeah, um a useful conversation for me.
01:40:37.359 --> 01:40:42.479
Thanks as always to our guests and our production crew, Emma, Michael, and Tim, who put this all together.
01:40:42.800 --> 01:40:54.560
Class is a podcast of DSA's National Political Education Committee, or NPEC, which works to expand the knowledge of DSA members and non-members in the service of winning the struggle for socialism and democracy.
01:40:54.960 --> 01:40:59.520
You can find out more about NPEC by searching for us online or following us on social media.
01:40:59.680 --> 01:41:05.199
But the best way to find out what our committee is up to is by signing up for Red Letter, NPEC's monthly newsletter.
01:41:05.359 --> 01:41:10.239
And if you aren't already, you can become a DSA member by following the link in the podcast description.
01:41:10.800 --> 01:41:13.039
Okay, until next time, solidarity.
