इस एपिसोड के बारे में
We explore how the language we use around AI shifts accountability from code to character, drawing on Slava Polonski’s research and Bob Baxley’s call for design courage. As practitioners debate whether to pivot toward technical skills or defend human-centered insights, we ask who truly gets to define the work when professional boundaries blur.
From The Feed- What nobody tells you about AI ethics (Slava Polonski, PhD) — Framing AI decisions shifts accountability from code to character, requiring designers to own the narrative.
- 7 Critical Mistakes You’re Likely Making with Claude Code (Nick Babich) — Users waste tokens by skipping context exploration before implementation with Claude Code.
- Live event: Design Courage, with Bob Baxley (Scott Berkun) — Designers must become their own advocates and own decisions rather than just advising on them.
- Announcing the Conference Program for Shift UX 2026 (aedwards) — Rosenfeld Media shares updates on the upcoming Shift UX 2026 conference program.
- Deciding between 2 research directions (AI/LLM/HCI) (r/hci) — Choosing between technical and human-centered AI paths determines whether we blame code or character.
- I hate the term “Full-Stack UX Designer” (r/UXResearch) — Merging distinct roles into one hire shifts blame from organizational failure to individual capability.
- Pivoting from UX Research? (r/UXResearch) — Forcing researchers to code dilutes their core value and raises questions about retaining human insight.
- The Most Important Industrial Designer of All Time — L. Jeffrey Zeldman
- AI is lying to us, and nobody seems to care — Dan Maccarone
- Relighting Images with Depth Maps and Three.js — Dominik Fojcik
- CSS Navigation Matching, Early Days — Geoff Graham
- Which market is better right now: UX research or UX design? — r/UXResearch
- Looking for FOSS alternative to Atlas.ti (Uni provides access for it but I run Linux :/) — r/UXResearch
- Should I tell a company I’m interviewing with that I started a new job? — r/UXResearch
- psych grad shifting to UX research - need career advice — r/UXResearch
About The Feed & The Thread
The Feed & The Thread is a daily summary of UX articles found in the industry and some light-touch updates from the UX Community found in online forums. It’s brief, and meant as a light-touch overview of what’s happening across UX.
अंग्रेज़ी
संयुक्त राज्य अमरीका
इस एपिसोड में
अनुलिपि 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
पिछले एपिसोड्स खोजें
The Feed & The Thread के पिछले एपिसोड खोजें।
इस पॉडकास्ट के अन्य एपिसोड
We ask why designers are still essential when AI can generate code in seconds, arguing that the answer lies in judgment rather than execution. Fabricio Teixeira and Nick Babich highlight how taste and decision rights are becoming the primary differentiators against AI’s sameness, even as tools like…
We explore why repetition feels so comfortable, from Luke Wroblewski’s argument that intelligence is built on simple, repeated blocks to Dora Czerna’s warning that professional competence can trap us in stagnant routines. This tension between building a foundation and hitting a ceiling is mirrored …
We’re asking why our organizations are failing at AI adoption despite having the tools, arguing that the real friction lies in a cultural gap where staff see higher expectations rather than better working conditions. Paul Boag and Kate Agena highlight how ignoring personal benefit and treating know…
We’re asking whether the line between designing and building is actually dissolving, or if we’re just shifting the burden of coordination onto product managers who were never hired for it. Nil Thyrion argues that design is becoming the primary differentiator as code generation gets easier, while Je…
We ask whether treating AI as a shortcut for user research trades necessary depth for speed, noting that while synthetic users match broad conclusions, they miss the natural variation that reveals edge cases. Rachel Banawa’s work on homogenized AI responses contrasts with Wira Indra Kusuma’s argume…
अस्वीकरण: इस पृष्ठ पर एम्बेडेड पॉडकास्ट और कलाकृति Chicago Camps से हैं, जो इसके मालिक की संपत्ति है और Listen Notes, Inc. से संबद्ध या समर्थित नहीं है।
संपादित करें
पॉडकास्ट डेटाबेस को अपडेटेड रखने में मदद के लिए धन्यवाद।
