इस एपिसोड के बारे में
We’re shifting from capturing attention to governing it, a move Aurélie Radom argues is necessary now that AI has made machine focus cheap and human attention the true scarce resource. This governance challenge extends to our tools and processes, from Will Schiavone’s findings on AI’s nuanced but fragmented coding of user responses to the practical headache of retiring static design assets that live on in local libraries. We explore how these shifts force us to rethink everything from organizational headcount to the statistical foundations of our research, asking whether we are truly building systems or just filling templates.
From The Feed- Guppy Ahluwalia – Token times: Organizational practices in a resource-constrained environment. (Chicago Camps) — Teams must abandon headcount-heavy structures to build scalable, strategic processes in resource-constrained environments.
- ChatGPT vs Humans for Coding Open-Ended Responses, Three Years Later (Will Schiavone, PhD • Eva Sundberg, MPH • Jeff Sauro, PhD) — Newer AI models generate finer subcategories for coding responses, requiring new alignment methods to prevent data fragmentation.
- The economics of attention in the age of AI (Aurélie Radom) — AI makes machine attention cheap, forcing human attention to become the scarce resource that design must govern rather than capture.
- Fong test? (r/UXResearch) — The Fong test for Kano questionnaires is mathematically shaky because it assumes independent samples from the same people.
- How are UX teams using AI for stakeholder presentations? (r/UserExperience) — disconnect insights from their source by prioritizing speed over data integrity.
- Why do people say to get experience before applying to a masters program? (r/hci) — The requirement for experience before a degree creates a catch-22 that raises questions about industry hiring barriers.
- How do you retire an icon once people have already downloaded the SVG? (r/DesignSystems) — Design systems face a governance gap where static copies of assets persist in local libraries even after source code is updated.
- How to de-slopify your designs — Maya Brennan
- My Glamorous Life: in Which I am a Target — L. Jeffrey Zeldman
- I Tested Claude Sonnet 5.5 for Web Design — Nick Babich
- Giving away UX books — r/UXResearch
- Are there people in Alabama who I can't talk to about UX/UI Research? — r/UXResearch
- "Why do people ignore new feedback or notifications when they're already overloaded with work". — r/UXResearch
About The Feed & The Thread
The Feed & The Thread is a daily summary of UX articles found in the industry and some light-touch updates from the UX Community found in online forums. It’s brief, and meant as a light-touch overview of what’s happening across UX.
अंग्रेज़ी
संयुक्त राज्य अमरीका
इस एपिसोड में
अनुलिपि 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
पिछले एपिसोड्स खोजें
The Feed & The Thread के पिछले एपिसोड खोजें।
इस पॉडकास्ट के अन्य एपिसोड
We’re past asking if AI is fast enough; now we have to ask if it’s honest, especially when tools like Strava start defining who we are more than our own intuition does. We unpack the danger of "cargo cult" design and the rise of the Homo Metricus, where data overrides bodily sensation, wh…
We ask whether AI’s speed is actually improving our work or just shifting complexity to users who must now manage the "evaluation plumbing," as Patrick Neeman argues. Sophie Shrimpton warns that we’re risking a digital landfill of disposable interfaces by confusing fast design with true U…
We explore the dangerous illusion of synthetic research, where Kyle Soucy argues that LLM-generated users create a false confidence that masks bad decisions, while Emily Haines Lloyd warns that the influx of low-quality machine text is squeezing out the nuanced human work that actually resonates. T…
We’re facing a quiet shift where the bottleneck in design has moved from generation to curation, as Tanner Kohler argues that we’re losing value by manually managing stale context libraries while Hiroshi Sato urges us to design for ideas that don’t yet exist. This tension between managing chaos and…
We examine the growing gap between AI’s expanding capabilities and our ability to control them, starting with Patrizia Bertini’s argument that recent safety incidents are inevitable results of prioritizing speed over structural integrity. This tension is mirrored in the community, where senior desi…
अस्वीकरण: इस पृष्ठ पर एम्बेडेड पॉडकास्ट और कलाकृति Chicago Camps से हैं, जो इसके मालिक की संपत्ति है और Listen Notes, Inc. से संबद्ध या समर्थित नहीं है।
संपादित करें
पॉडकास्ट डेटाबेस को अपडेटेड रखने में मदद के लिए धन्यवाद।
