इस एपिसोड के बारे में

अंग्रेज़ी
संयुक्त राज्य अमरीका

अनुलिपि 🔗

पिछले एपिसोड्स खोजें

Data Science in the Wild के पिछले एपिसोड खोजें।

इस पॉडकास्ट के अन्य एपिसोड

A deep dive into how to spend a fixed token budget when evaluating an agentic RAG system. Using generalizability theory on HotpotQA and MuSiQue, the authors split evaluation variance into question, trajectory and read components, and find that at roughly 34 million tokens broader question coverage …
Platforms often can't randomize individual users, so they switch whole regions or markets between treatment and control over time — but few units, heterogeneity, non-stationarity and carryover make those tests noisy. This episode walks through Sequentially-Rerandomized Switchback (SRSB): treatment …
Token budgets for RAG: which questions deserve extra retrieval? On FinanceBench, the cost of an extra call is easy to predict (R² 0.93) but its benefit isn't (AUROC 0.60). Gain-per-token escalation still uses 46.6% fewer tokens than top-5 everywhere. Key takeaways: Escalate selectively. Every ques…
A deep dive into a method for speeding up A/B tests of recommender, retrieval and LLM-interface policies. Olivier Jeunen observes that when the treatment and control policies choose the same action, the outcome adds noise but no information about the treatment effect. Treating randomisation as a me…
Pinterest's fine-tuned XLM-RoBERTa relevance judge made stratified sampling affordable, cutting search A/B-test MDE from 1.3–1.5% to ≤0.25%. Key takeaways: A small, fast judge. An XLM-RoBERTa-large cross-encoder fine-tuned on ~2.6M human-labeled query–Pin pairs labels 150,000 rows in 30 minutes on…
अस्वीकरण: इस पृष्ठ पर एम्बेडेड पॉडकास्ट और कलाकृति Peter Liu से हैं, जो इसके मालिक की संपत्ति है और Listen Notes, Inc. से संबद्ध या समर्थित नहीं है।