इस एपिसोड के बारे में
UVA Law professors John Duffy and Dan Ortiz discuss whether the Supreme Court will or should overturn one of its most famous decisions, Chevron, which gave administrative agencies deference in interpreting statutes.
अंग्रेज़ी
संयुक्त राज्य अमरीका
अनुलिपि 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
इस पॉडकास्ट के अन्य एपिसोड
What makes people and organizations obey — or resist — the law? Social scientist Susan S. Silbey, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, discusses her life’s work on the subject.
Congressional conflicts with the executive branch often set off legal battles in the courts, and cases can drag on until the point is moot. UVA Law professor Payvand Ahdout digs into why this is happening and what impact it has on the balance of power.
Facial recognition technology is used for everything from unlocking your phone to locking up criminals. UVA Law professor Elizabeth Rowe makes the case that biometric data like your face and fingerprints should have trade secret-level protections.
The federal process for reviewing proposed interstate natural gas pipelines was highly contentious several decades ago and is now more of a rubber stamp. UVA Law professor Alison Gocke looks at what changed.
Political scientist James L. Gibson discusses his survey data suggesting the U.S. Supreme Court lost some legitimacy in the eyes of the public after overturning Roe v. Wade.
अस्वीकरण: इस पृष्ठ पर एम्बेडेड पॉडकास्ट और कलाकृति Common Law से हैं, जो इसके मालिक की संपत्ति है और Listen Notes, Inc. से संबद्ध या समर्थित नहीं है।
संपादित करें
पॉडकास्ट डेटाबेस को अपडेटेड रखने में मदद के लिए धन्यवाद।
