אודות פרק זה
Epistemic status: I traced one famous anecdote to its printed source and to both coauthors' own accounts of where it came from. Confident it was never a study. No claim either way about whether quantity beats quality in general.
AI use: research (tracing the story to the book, to the coauthors' emails and to earlier LessWrong threads), fact-check of every claim against the sources, footnotes, grammar.
I was reading a book and stumbled onto a claim that there was an experiment. A group of students learning pottery was divided into two groups. One group was told that they would be evaluated based on volume, i.e. the number of pieces they produced. The other group was told that they would be evaluated based on the quality of their best piece. Then both groups were compared based on the quality of the best piece, and the "quantity" group showed better results.
I was extremely intrigued by this experiment and was curious to understand how big the groups were and how they evaluated the quality of a pottery piece (there must be some way to quantify that for the sake of the comparison?).
To my surprise, this wasn't a scientific study, but [...]
The original text contained 4 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
October 12th, 2026
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/LrAqM4bGmAoA79rP3/quantity-vs-quality-in-pottery-is-a-lie
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
AI use: research (tracing the story to the book, to the coauthors' emails and to earlier LessWrong threads), fact-check of every claim against the sources, footnotes, grammar.
I was reading a book and stumbled onto a claim that there was an experiment. A group of students learning pottery was divided into two groups. One group was told that they would be evaluated based on volume, i.e. the number of pieces they produced. The other group was told that they would be evaluated based on the quality of their best piece. Then both groups were compared based on the quality of the best piece, and the "quantity" group showed better results.
I was extremely intrigued by this experiment and was curious to understand how big the groups were and how they evaluated the quality of a pottery piece (there must be some way to quantify that for the sake of the comparison?).
To my surprise, this wasn't a scientific study, but [...]
The original text contained 4 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
October 12th, 2026
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/LrAqM4bGmAoA79rP3/quantity-vs-quality-in-pottery-is-a-lie
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
אנגלית
ארצות הברית
תעתיק 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
פרקים אחרים בפודקאסט הזה
Tl;dr: The frontier AI companies’ implicit alignment plans center on rushing towards RSI with something like current models. This plan is (at best) contentious, and many believe it will have catastrophic consequences. Nonetheless, it is the track we are on. It is therefore important to collect evi…
Good empirical safety research is heavily bottlenecked on thinking more clearly. This post shares a few frames and tips I found useful, illustrated with concrete examples. I spent the better part of 2026 in empirical AI safety research apprenticeships. I was mentored by Alex Turner and Alex Cloud …
David Africa & Nick Levine TLDR We ran several persona experiments on Talkie, a 13B model trained only on English text from before 1931. We ran them alongside its modern twin (same architecture, trained on regular data as a control) and Llama-3.1-8B.
Talkie can generalise maliciously. You ca…
The Piltdown man was the most successful artifactual hoax of all time. The relevant skull was a chimeric melange of orangutan and human bone fragments from several individuals “discovered” in England in 1912, and meant to represent a transitional form between apes and humans. Given the intense int…
הצהרה: הפודקאסט והגרפיקה המוטבעים בדף זה הם מ-LessWrong, שהוא רכושו של בעליו ואינו קשור או מאושר על ידי Listen Notes, Inc.
