אודות פרק זה
Marcus Daniell is an Olympic Bronze Medalist and former top 35 ATP doubles player who reached the quarterfinals of Wimbledon and the Australian Open. He also founded High Impact Athletes, a company that connects professional athletes with high-impact charities.
Gaby Dabrowski recently launched a fundraising campaign with HIA called Gaby's Games for Good to help protect women and girls from violence.
👉 DONATE TO GABY'S CAMPAIGN HERE
This episode digs into charities, giving, and, of course, doubles!
- How Gaby’s Games for Good works and how the 1 in 3 Fund makes a huge difference in protecting women and girls
- Why Marcus shifted from singles to doubles and what he would change about that timeline
- The “Chapel of Bull$&*t” lesson from coach David Sammel
- How to train full mental presence in short bursts
- What Marcus’s doubles style looks like and how to beat him
- The Tokyo Olympic bronze story with Michael Venus and what he did when he felt burnt out
- A practical three-step approach to handling nerves in tiebreakers and closing moments
- Net positioning tips for the server’s partner and the returner’s partner
- What could make pro doubles more popular, including stable teams and better storytelling
- Why High Impact Athletes exists and how effective giving can multiply the impact of each dollar
I learned a ton in this one, especially as Marcus described his Olympic story. I also hope you'll join me in donating below.
HIA Links:
Learn more about Marcus & follow:
-----
**Join the #1 Doubles Strategy Newsletter for Club Tennis Players**
**Become a Tennis Tribe Member**
Tennis Tribe Members get access to premium video lessons, a monthly member-only webinar, doubles strategy Ebooks & Courses, exclusive discounts on tennis gear, and more.
**Other Free Doubles Content**
בפרק זה
הראה הערות 🔗
תעתיק 🔗
00:01:16.020 --> 00:01:17.859
This conversation is a little bit different.
00:01:18.100 --> 00:01:27.380
You're going to hear a chat about doubles sandwiched in between two smaller conversations around giving and charity.
00:01:27.620 --> 00:01:30.820
My guest, Marcus Daniel, is from New Zealand.
00:01:30.980 --> 00:01:34.820
He's a former top 35 doubles player in the world.
00:01:34.900 --> 00:01:38.420
He's made the quarterfinals of a couple of grand slams.
00:01:39.140 --> 00:01:53.140
And possibly more impressively, he started high impact athletes about five years ago and has grown it into a charity organization with over 200 athletes around the world.
00:01:53.380 --> 00:02:04.820
He reached out to me to talk about Gabby Dobrowski's recent charity campaign called Gabby's Games for Good, which we start this conversation discussing.
00:02:05.219 --> 00:02:11.620
Ted Tribe decided to donate$2 for every game that Gabby wins throughout the 2026 season.
00:02:11.699 --> 00:02:19.219
And I'm going to link in the show notes where you can learn more about that and also donate to Gabby's charity of choice as well.
00:02:19.379 --> 00:02:22.100
So check that out and donate if you can.
00:02:22.500 --> 00:02:25.460
After that, we discussed Marcus's story.
00:02:25.540 --> 00:02:26.980
He grew up in New Zealand.
00:02:27.540 --> 00:02:38.500
He had the kind of classic viewer debate that a lot of tennis players or doubles players have with themselves on when to give up singles and when to focus on doubles.
00:02:38.580 --> 00:02:45.860
And he shares his story from the Auckland tournament in 2010, where he got a wild card and won the tournament.
00:02:46.500 --> 00:02:55.300
He suffered through some injuries and eventually decided to focus on doubles, which ended up being a very successful choice.
00:02:55.620 --> 00:02:57.460
I also asked him a lot of strategy questions.
00:02:57.540 --> 00:03:04.660
So I asked him just to describe his game style and then how he would coach someone to beat his game style.
00:03:05.220 --> 00:03:12.100
He really opens up about his Olympic bronze medal experience in Tokyo, where he won with Michael Venus.
00:03:12.580 --> 00:03:22.580
He talked about a lot of the struggles he had leading up to those Olympics and how he dealt with that and what he did and did not share with his doubles partner Michael Venus during that.
00:03:22.660 --> 00:03:26.579
And then of course his reaction after they won the bronze medal.
00:03:26.900 --> 00:03:32.100
So that was a really heartfelt, great story that was really kind of him to share.
00:03:32.420 --> 00:03:40.420
After that, we talked about what advice he would give himself back when he started if he had any regrets during his career.
00:03:40.579 --> 00:03:49.620
And then we dove into strategy, how to deal with pressure, strategy advice for the server's partner, for the returner's partner, and then of course how to make doubles more popular.
00:03:49.780 --> 00:03:54.259
And at the end, he shares the story of how he started high-impact athletes.
00:03:54.340 --> 00:04:02.180
It's a really impressive story, and it's really an amazing accomplishment where he's been able to take it.
00:04:02.500 --> 00:04:14.819
You're going to learn why all charities are not created equal and why you need to be really diligent about where you spend your money and how it can be much more effective to give to certain charities over another.
00:04:15.060 --> 00:04:17.060
So this is a wide-ranging conversation.
00:04:17.139 --> 00:04:25.540
You'll get lots of doubles, also some uh really great opportunities to give back and to understand um what it means to give effectively.
00:04:25.699 --> 00:04:30.900
So without further delay, enjoy this conversation with Marcus Daniel.
00:04:31.220 --> 00:04:32.900
Hey everybody, welcome to the show.
00:04:32.980 --> 00:04:35.060
Today we have Marcus Daniel on.
00:04:35.220 --> 00:04:36.100
Marcus, welcome.
00:04:36.420 --> 00:04:37.300
Thanks for having me.
00:04:37.540 --> 00:04:38.420
Pleasure to chat.
00:04:38.740 --> 00:04:39.139
Awesome.
00:04:39.220 --> 00:04:40.740
I'm glad uh glad you're here.
00:04:40.900 --> 00:04:41.860
Glad you reached out.
00:04:41.939 --> 00:04:45.139
Um, I want to talk about your doubles career.
00:04:45.220 --> 00:04:51.860
Uh, I want to talk about doubles strategy, I want to talk about high impact athletes, which you started uh as well.
00:04:52.019 --> 00:05:06.259
But before we get to all that, uh I want to start with the reason you reached out to me, um, to talk a little bit about Gabby's Games for Good, um, which you started with uh Gabby Dobrowski, who's been on the podcast a number of times in the past.
00:05:06.500 --> 00:05:10.819
So tell people what is Gabby's Game Games for Good.
00:05:12.660 --> 00:05:17.620
Yeah, so I definitely wouldn't have reached out for something for myself.
00:05:17.699 --> 00:05:25.540
Um, but good friend of mine, Gabby Dobrowski, one of the best women's doubles players in the world, I think she's ranked number two as we record right now.
00:05:25.780 --> 00:05:40.020
Uh, amazing person, and she's doing a fundraising campaign where for every game that she wins this year, and that's game, not match, um, she's giving$20 to something called the One and Three Fund.
00:05:40.180 --> 00:05:52.180
And the One and Three Fund is a collection of organizations that have a proven track record of doing really, really good work at preventing gender-based violence, so preventing violence against women and girls.
00:05:52.420 --> 00:06:01.700
The reason it's called the One and Three Fund is because globally, one in three women will experience sexual or physical abuse in their lifetime.
00:06:02.020 --> 00:06:06.580
When I first heard that stat, I was pretty blown away.
00:06:06.660 --> 00:06:10.660
Like it's it's a very shocking stat when you sit down and think about it.
00:06:10.900 --> 00:06:27.379
And, you know, as a recent father and you you're a soon-to-be father, thinking about, you know, if if you had a daughter and the chances globally are one in three, you know, 30-ish percent, um, that they're going to experience physical or sexual abuse, you'd want to do something about it.
00:06:27.540 --> 00:06:30.260
Um so that's what that's what this is.
00:06:30.340 --> 00:06:39.060
This is Gabby using her platform and using her own resources to uh to try to do something about uh this issue that she feels really strongly about.
00:06:39.300 --> 00:06:41.700
Um and I think what she's doing is amazing.
00:06:41.860 --> 00:06:47.460
Uh, I think she speaks about it really well, and she's already raised something like 10 grand so far.
00:06:47.780 --> 00:06:55.140
Um and yeah, I guess my my ask of everyone listening is to go and go and check it out.
00:06:55.300 --> 00:07:03.060
Um it's in the link of in her Instagram bio, or it's gamesforgood.1and3.org.
00:07:03.300 --> 00:07:08.180
Um, and yeah, throw in a donation or or make a smaller pledge alongside her.
00:07:08.340 --> 00:07:14.580
Um every$12.50 that's raised will provide one month free from violence for a woman or a girl.
00:07:14.740 --> 00:07:18.500
Uh that's that's a very conservative estimate based on very deep research.
00:07:18.660 --> 00:07:26.340
So, you know, a small amount of money, a couple of copies, goes a really long way, can be literally life-changing for a woman or a girl.
00:07:26.420 --> 00:07:34.100
And yeah, so I'll I'll stop ranting there, but I just think it's a beautiful thing that she's doing, and I I would love for more people to know about it.
00:07:34.420 --> 00:07:35.540
Yeah, that's amazing.
00:07:35.700 --> 00:07:41.620
Yeah, I want to um it's been a while since Gabby's been on, so I'll try to have her on and she can talk more about it.
00:07:41.780 --> 00:07:45.780
But we'll so we'll link to it in the show notes for people listening, so y'all can click on that.
00:07:45.939 --> 00:07:54.900
There's um a lot of information about how it works, and it um it's super easy to uh start donating.
00:07:55.140 --> 00:07:59.140
Um and then uh yeah, so I'll link to that.
00:07:59.220 --> 00:08:02.020
Everybody can click on it, donate if you can.
00:08:02.260 --> 00:08:07.460
Um you've got different options here: 10 cents, 25 cents,$1 per game.
00:08:07.540 --> 00:08:10.740
Um, tenants tribe, we're gonna do$2 per game.
00:08:10.980 --> 00:08:17.220
Um so hopefully, uh hopefully people can um match that or maybe even exceed it.
00:08:17.300 --> 00:08:21.540
And uh yeah, it looks like almost 10,000 so far, but the goal is a hundred thousand.
00:08:21.620 --> 00:08:22.819
So we've got a ways to go.
00:08:23.060 --> 00:08:24.500
So hopefully a lot of listeners.
00:08:24.740 --> 00:08:29.939
We've got a way to hopefully a lot of listeners are able to uh check it out and and donate some.
00:08:30.100 --> 00:08:32.100
Um but uh that's a really really cool story.
00:08:32.179 --> 00:08:41.939
And I want to get into high impact athletes and kind of one of the keys that you said is a proven track record for um this sort of work, right?
00:08:42.019 --> 00:08:46.419
Um so I want to talk about that a little bit later, but let's dive into doubles uh for a moment.
00:08:46.500 --> 00:08:47.939
So a little bit of a transition.
00:08:48.100 --> 00:08:50.899
Talk start uh to start, talk about your story.
00:08:50.980 --> 00:08:57.379
How did you get started in doubles to uh a pretty successful pro career um as well?
00:08:58.179 --> 00:09:05.700
Yeah, I I think I should have been born 50 years earlier, and then I might have had a good singles career.
00:09:05.860 --> 00:09:12.500
Um I was always a lot more comfortable coming forward, like attacking, coming to the net, trying to finish off points at the net.
00:09:12.580 --> 00:09:19.139
Uh the only singles professional titles I won were on grass where that sort of play is is more rewarded.
00:09:19.379 --> 00:09:33.139
Um so I played both uh through my younger years and until I was, I think, about 24, 25, was playing both singles and doubles at all of the tournaments I'd play.
00:09:33.620 --> 00:09:36.819
Um and I got to about 500 in singles.
00:09:36.899 --> 00:09:39.139
Uh my doubles was slightly ahead.
00:09:39.220 --> 00:09:41.939
I think I was maybe in the 200s or something like that.
00:09:42.179 --> 00:09:51.299
Um and I reached a stage where uh I'd actually just won my second singles title on the grass in Ilkley.
00:09:51.699 --> 00:10:01.059
Uh and I had got into one of the very few challenger main draws I'd I'd been sneaking into in Canada.
00:10:01.219 --> 00:10:08.099
So played the final on the Sunday, had to leave straight afterwards, arrive and basically get off the plane and play my first match.
00:10:08.259 --> 00:10:15.379
I remember I got a beating from James McGee, could hardly see the ball, so I was out of singles, but I was still in doubles.
00:10:15.860 --> 00:10:19.939
And I was playing with Art and CTEC, and we won that week.
00:10:20.099 --> 00:10:24.500
Uh and it was the first, this was in Granby Canada.
00:10:24.579 --> 00:10:28.659
This was the first of four weeks in a row of challenges that I'd that I'd scheduled to play.
00:10:28.819 --> 00:10:33.779
Uh, and I was in the main draw of the singles in the first week, qualifying of the three afterwards.
00:10:34.019 --> 00:10:39.219
But I won the doubles in the first week, which meant that I missed qualifying of singles for the second week.
00:10:39.459 --> 00:10:50.019
And then again, I think I went like finals or win of the second challenger, and the same thing just happened for four weeks in a row, where I went deep in doubles, which meant that I missed qualifying of singles.
00:10:50.339 --> 00:11:02.019
And by the end of that four week stretch, I was I think slightly outside top 100 doubles, and my singles had slid a bit because I'd lost some points, so I hadn't defended some points.
00:11:02.339 --> 00:11:08.659
So then it became you know quite quite a heavy decision.
00:11:08.740 --> 00:11:25.620
It was like, okay, do I go and play challenger main draws and doubles, maybe try and sneak into some tour events and just bargain on qualifying in singles, or do I, you know, keep pursuing the singles career and um Artem really wanted to keep playing together, uh, so convinced me to play some more challenges for the rest of the year.
00:11:25.699 --> 00:11:26.980
And the same thing kept happening.
00:11:27.059 --> 00:11:34.899
I wouldn't go deep enough in singles, but I'd like make semi-finals or win of the doubles and miss qualifying for the following following event for singles.
00:11:35.059 --> 00:11:45.939
So end of the year, it actually had become a pretty simple decision that okay, my my two rankings had split so far apart that I may as well try and play big tournaments and doubles.
00:11:46.099 --> 00:11:51.779
Um and that was I think that was the that was 2014 that that happened.
00:11:52.019 --> 00:12:06.179
And so decided in 2015 to focus on doubles, and it actually it turned out to be a good decision pretty quickly because February of that following year we won Montpelier, which was a 250.
00:12:06.579 --> 00:12:15.139
Um, and then that kicked me into the ranking where I was, you know, that year I started playing the slams and and sort of from there was locked into the tour level.
00:12:15.219 --> 00:12:22.980
So yeah, it was it was an organic process, and you know, I'm I missed playing singles, but my game was definitely better suited to doubles.
00:12:23.059 --> 00:12:35.860
And I also like I grew up playing a lot of football and team sports, and I love it's almost a perfect balance for me of like there's enough individuality in doubles that if if you play badly, your team's probably gonna lose.
00:12:36.099 --> 00:12:42.259
But there's enough team energy that chemistry is really important, and you have to be thinking about the the team aspect.
00:12:42.500 --> 00:12:50.019
So yeah, I'm probably biased given that I had most of my success in doubles, but I I'm glad I made the decision when I did.
00:12:51.059 --> 00:12:57.620
Do you think about I feel like I hear that story almost every time I have somebody on the podcast, right?
00:12:57.699 --> 00:13:00.179
They're like trying to balance the singles and doubles ranking.
00:13:00.259 --> 00:13:04.740
And a lot of players I talk to are still trying to make that decision, right?
00:13:04.899 --> 00:13:13.139
Are still trying to um raise their singles ranking, which makes sense to me because it's you know, the the prize money is like 10x.
00:13:13.219 --> 00:13:19.219
So if you can somehow, you know, make it through in singles, like you've got to take the chance at it.
00:13:19.379 --> 00:13:39.539
Um do you like looking back, which you had made the decision earlier, or do you feel like it kind of happened at the right time uh looking back, I think it would have been smart, both from an injury perspective and from a like opportunities perspective, to have made the decision a lot earlier.
00:13:39.860 --> 00:13:51.939
I when I was 20, I think, um I randomly got a last-minute wild card into the Auckland ATP in 2010.
00:13:52.099 --> 00:13:59.299
Um and got paired up with Horia Takao, who had had never won a tour event at that stage either.
00:13:59.379 --> 00:14:09.299
So he was like the highest doubles player who hadn't got into the tournament, and I was the highest ranked Kiwi who hadn't got in, and the tournament director just thought give them both an opportunity.
00:14:09.539 --> 00:14:19.779
And we ended up yeah, we ended up just going on a dream run and winning winning the tournament out of nowhere, um beating beating some pretty hefty teams on on the way.
00:14:20.179 --> 00:14:28.419
Um and after that tournament, I was way too kiwi about it.
00:14:28.579 --> 00:14:35.779
Like my my response to winning it was okay, don't get a big head, you're still playing futures, like just keep grinding.
00:14:36.099 --> 00:14:41.539
What I should have done was go and play challenges in doubles and qualifying in singles.
00:14:41.779 --> 00:15:00.019
And if the same thing happens just four years earlier, where okay, my singles wasn't up to scratch to go deep into challenger events, but my doubles was good enough, then that organic process might have happened four years earlier, and I would have had four extra years of probably better health to um to make an impact.
00:15:00.339 --> 00:15:08.659
Because I think pretty soon after that I got a bad injury in my back and was out for a year, and then that yeah, just had a lot of injuries afterwards.
00:15:08.819 --> 00:15:11.219
So hindsight's always 2020.
00:15:11.299 --> 00:15:13.620
You know, there are a couple of big decisions that I wish I'd made differently.
00:15:13.779 --> 00:15:19.620
One of them was that was um not focusing on doubles earlier, and the other was not going to college in the States.
00:15:19.699 --> 00:15:21.860
I decided to turn pro instead.
00:15:22.019 --> 00:15:25.539
So those two things I'd do differently if I could have it all over again.
00:15:26.579 --> 00:15:36.179
Who had the biggest impact on your doubles game, or maybe who taught you the most for that that impacted your doubles game?
00:15:38.579 --> 00:15:41.379
Doubles specifically, I would say Louis Caillet.
00:15:41.939 --> 00:15:49.459
Um, but I I attribute most of my professional success to the guy I worked with for over a decade called David Sammel.
00:15:49.860 --> 00:15:55.379
Um he's a South African-born guy who's lived in the UK for 30 plus years.
00:15:55.620 --> 00:16:02.980
Uh he ran Bath Academy and I was based there for five, six years and kept working with him after after I moved.
00:16:03.379 --> 00:16:08.579
Um so he had a massive impact on me just in every aspect of the game.
00:16:08.819 --> 00:16:24.899
But then specifically for doubles, Louis Caillet uh he's known across the doubles world as being a bit of a genius with strategy, with positioning, with almost a formulaic approach to doubles, which can be quite boring, but man, it works.
00:16:25.059 --> 00:16:33.539
Um and it takes something pretty special and and talented to break the formula if you're playing against it.
00:16:33.779 --> 00:16:42.819
Um so yeah, I I was lucky enough to have a stretch with Dominic Englot uh I think in sort of 2017 or so.
00:16:43.059 --> 00:16:51.379
We we had some good results together, played together for six months before I got injured again, and then um I was out for a bit and he he found another partner.
00:16:51.459 --> 00:17:11.299
But in those six months, having little stretches with Louis and understanding the way they approach doubles, and also looking at video with him uh and and trying to understand what he saw, that was a step change in my understanding of what good doubles looks like.
00:17:12.339 --> 00:17:14.259
Well, what's a key lesson?
00:17:14.500 --> 00:17:19.220
It could be related to singles or doubles, just just a tennis lesson that you learned from David.
00:17:21.539 --> 00:17:29.220
There's there's one massive one that sticks in my mind, and it's not it's not uh technique or anything like that.
00:17:29.460 --> 00:17:33.779
Um people swear on your shot.
00:17:35.140 --> 00:17:36.019
I'm not sure.
00:17:36.180 --> 00:17:37.299
We can try.
00:17:38.660 --> 00:17:45.380
So um it's gone down in history in Bath as the Chapel of Bullshit sermon.
00:17:45.620 --> 00:17:45.779
Okay.
00:17:46.099 --> 00:17:57.059
Um and in a nutshell, it is d just stop making excuses, I guess is the simplest way to sum it up.
00:17:57.299 --> 00:18:07.779
But the the slightly longer story behind it is I'd just been playing a challenger qualifying in Nottingham, lost a really close match and two tiebreakers and singles to a guy who was much higher ranked than me.
00:18:08.019 --> 00:18:30.099
I thought I'd tried pretty hard, like put a good effort in, came off court, did all my warm downs, shower blah blah blah, met Dave and another coach from Bath for a little debrief, and Dave essentially just laid into me and you know called me a tourist, and that I I hadn't been present in the game, that I was worshipping at the chapel of bullshit.
00:18:30.339 --> 00:18:34.339
Um, and I was quite taken aback to begin with.
00:18:34.420 --> 00:18:54.740
Uh, and he he centered it around this one thing that had happened in the game, which was I think it was like 3-2 in the first set tiebreaker, or some like very close score on the first set tiebreaker, and my opponent had got a net chord winner, and I looked at Dave and said, Oh man, it's not my day.
00:18:55.220 --> 00:19:11.779
And that sounds like a small thing, but if you think about it, it was a ridiculous thing to say, and it reflected a mindset that was I have a built-in excuse to not win this match.
00:19:12.500 --> 00:19:18.579
Opponent got one point from a net cord, and because of that, it's not my day, and it's not my day to win this match.
00:19:18.819 --> 00:19:20.420
And that was the thing that he pointed out.
00:19:20.500 --> 00:19:24.180
That's that's his sort of framing of worshiping at the chapel of bullshit.
00:19:24.339 --> 00:19:30.819
Like, there is no reason that that thing should mean that you shouldn't win this match or that it's not your day.
00:19:31.139 --> 00:19:49.779
And so just a small example, but what it led to was an agreement between me and Dave where in practice and in matches, there was a an absolute commitment to being 100% mentally present for every shot.
00:19:50.420 --> 00:20:01.460
And in practice, if there were three shots in a row that weren't 100% mentally present and we held each other accountable to this, then the training would finish.
00:20:01.940 --> 00:20:09.460
Um and for the first week I couldn't make it past about 40 minutes of of that level of intensity.
00:20:09.940 --> 00:20:14.819
Um, and I feel like I'm talking about a couple of different things here, but let me try and pull it together.
00:20:15.059 --> 00:20:32.420
So all of these excuses that your mind makes up and that you lean into because that's what we do as humans, we try to find the outs, think like tennis is hard, competing against people is hard, so we try and find these little outs for ourselves.
00:20:33.139 --> 00:20:46.019
If you remove all of that and and truly are 100% present in the moment and 100% focused, firstly, there's no room for excuses because you're just there and all of your focus is on the present.
00:20:46.180 --> 00:20:48.339
And secondly, it's exhausting.
00:20:48.819 --> 00:20:52.019
And that's why I couldn't keep it going for more than sort of 40 minutes.
00:20:52.099 --> 00:20:55.859
Because if you're that present for every single shot, you are just wrecked.
00:20:55.940 --> 00:21:02.339
And it takes time to build up the stamina to maintain that focus, not only mentally, but also physically.
00:21:02.500 --> 00:21:08.579
Because if you're that focused, then you don't shortcut on all of the little adjustment steps or being in the perfect position for a shot.
00:21:08.899 --> 00:21:18.819
So that conversation, the chapel of bullshit conversation, led to an understanding of what full mental intensity looked and felt like.
00:21:19.139 --> 00:21:31.619
And then that over time, I built stamina in that, and and there was like a very sharp inflection point in my ranking from that conversation to getting better and better and better and better results.
00:21:31.940 --> 00:21:37.379
Um and it's yeah, it's it's sort of hard to explain.
00:21:38.339 --> 00:21:47.059
But I think if people try it, just say like I'm going to be absolutely a hundred percent locked in for the next five minutes of training.
00:21:47.299 --> 00:21:58.659
If people try that, I think people will feel the difference between what that feels like and what a normal training session or normal hits on a tennis court looks like.
00:21:59.139 --> 00:22:27.379
And last thing I'll say on this is that this thing is why I have just huge respect for people like Djokovic and Nadal and the big four who could bring that level of intensity day in, day out, week in, week out for years and years and years and years while they had a big bullseye painted on their back, and they still managed to just hold on to that intense um focus because it's bloody exhausting.
00:22:28.420 --> 00:22:29.139
That's really good.
00:22:29.220 --> 00:22:30.819
I think you described that really well.
00:22:30.980 --> 00:22:40.259
Um I help coach a high school team here uh in my hometown, and we our practices are two hours.
00:22:40.500 --> 00:22:49.379
And one thing I tell them is look, I know you'll have school, I know y'all are trying to get into colleges, you have applications, all this stuff going on.
00:22:50.180 --> 00:22:52.899
And you can't give me 100% for two hours.
00:22:53.220 --> 00:23:02.659
But if you can give me 10 minutes or 30 minutes, just give me what you have today and go hard for those 10 or 20 or 30 or 40 minutes.
00:23:03.379 --> 00:23:07.779
And I'm gonna be happy with that, and we're going to get better.
00:23:08.500 --> 00:23:15.299
Um how would you advise someone listening to implement this who doesn't?
00:23:15.779 --> 00:23:19.299
Necessarily have David sitting there to yell at them.
00:23:19.619 --> 00:23:21.940
How can they they implement it for themselves?
00:23:22.339 --> 00:23:25.619
Somebody who doesn't necessarily hold them accountable.
00:23:29.460 --> 00:23:34.579
I think most of this, and especially if you're on the match court, it's you've got to keep yourself accountable.
00:23:34.659 --> 00:23:39.539
That's one of the beautiful things about tennis, is you like no one can do it for you.
00:23:39.859 --> 00:23:49.299
So the majority of tennis is being accountable to yourself, and good coaches help, but they they also can't do that when you're on the court playing a match.
00:23:49.539 --> 00:24:06.579
Um yeah, I I really like the the way you've communicated that to your high school team because I think I think putting a time period on it also gives you the difference between what 100% focus looks like and what normal looks like.
00:24:06.899 --> 00:24:22.899
And so as a piece of advice for for listeners, it would be for this game or for the next five minutes, I'm gonna absolutely lock in and nothing else distracts me, regardless of what happens.
00:24:23.139 --> 00:24:27.460
And then when that finishes, you think about it, you look at it, you think about it, how did that feel?
00:24:27.619 --> 00:24:30.659
What was different about that compared to what's normal for me?
00:24:30.899 --> 00:24:35.859
And part of the value of this is we're all human.
00:24:36.180 --> 00:24:42.980
No one can have a hundred percent perfect focus all the time for a five-set match.
00:24:43.220 --> 00:24:53.059
But where the best players in the world are better than everyone else is they'll notice when they slip out of that state and are much quicker at getting back in.
00:24:53.379 --> 00:25:00.659
So, you know, Nadal might have like one or two shots that look a bit weird because they're just unusual for him.
00:25:00.740 --> 00:25:05.700
And then he'll acknowledge it, he'll recognize where he slipped, and then he's straight back in.
00:25:05.859 --> 00:25:23.859
Whereas as you go down the rankings list, I think this is actually the biggest difference between the top players in the world and lower ranked players is both in training and especially in matches, they're much quicker to recognize when they've when they've fallen out of like the ideal mental focus and then getting themselves back into it.
00:25:24.099 --> 00:25:29.940
Um and to be able to to be able to identify that, you have to sort of be honest with yourself.
00:25:30.099 --> 00:25:38.099
And so, yeah, five minutes lock in, then have a think about it and be like, okay, how can I extend that to six minutes next time?
00:25:38.339 --> 00:25:46.019
How can I, if I fall out of it in that five minutes, how can I get back into that state as quickly as possible and not make three unforced errors in a row?
00:25:46.180 --> 00:25:49.940
If I can make two unforced errors and then back in, that's still a massive improvement.
00:25:51.059 --> 00:25:51.619
I like that.
00:25:51.779 --> 00:25:52.659
I like that a lot.
00:25:52.819 --> 00:25:56.420
I think people listening are going to be able to implement this like in a practical way.
00:25:56.579 --> 00:25:58.259
So I think that was really helpful.
00:25:59.220 --> 00:26:09.220
Um describe uh you've already done this a little bit, but describe your game style on the double court and then how you would coach someone to beat you.
00:26:09.460 --> 00:26:12.259
I can ask you this now that you're retired.
00:26:14.500 --> 00:26:31.940
Uh I was I would say creative and deft, and also a very good mover and anticipator and finisher at around the net.
00:26:32.579 --> 00:26:43.299
Um so yeah, I think my my biggest weapons were my volleys, my net play, and my returns actually became quite a weapon towards the end.
00:26:44.099 --> 00:26:48.019
Uh in terms of in terms of how to beat me.
00:26:52.819 --> 00:26:54.099
Play on clay.
00:26:55.139 --> 00:26:58.579
Yeah, that's probably the best thing that you can do.
00:26:58.819 --> 00:27:00.579
Play all the matches on clay.
00:27:00.740 --> 00:27:07.460
Um and neutralize me when I'm at the net, so quite a lot of lobs.
00:27:07.619 --> 00:27:23.619
I I really struggled against um people like Murray and Suarez because Murray was really good at lobbing, and that neutralizes you if you if someone lobs well, that sort of neutralizes the net player a bit.
00:27:23.700 --> 00:27:39.940
And then Bruno was just consistently one of the best returners on tour and could hold his returns, somehow could hold his returns for like half a second longer than other people and be able to see where you were going to try to poach and go the other way.
00:27:40.099 --> 00:27:49.379
So I just felt like when I was playing against them, I got on serve, we got so many less easy points finishing at the net.
00:27:49.539 --> 00:27:53.379
So that yeah, that's I found that really difficult.
00:27:53.539 --> 00:28:01.940
And the other, especially on clay, if you're playing against two big hitters, two like Kashinov Rublev, perfect example.
00:28:02.180 --> 00:28:11.859
Yeah, sometimes if you're not feeling on your game, they can just make you feel like a crappy tennis player because you know I can't match Rublev for pace.
00:28:12.019 --> 00:28:19.299
And if you're not serving well and they're just like running around and cracking forehands as hard as they want down the middle of the court, it's yeah.
00:28:19.539 --> 00:28:20.819
Yeah, they kind of take it.
00:28:20.980 --> 00:28:22.259
There aren't too many players in the world.
00:28:22.420 --> 00:28:22.899
Yeah, exactly.
00:28:23.059 --> 00:28:27.940
There aren't too many players who can hit that big, but the ones who can sometimes make you feel pretty stupid.
00:28:28.259 --> 00:28:28.899
Yeah.
00:28:29.460 --> 00:28:36.019
Um, describe the uh Olympic bronze medal uh you won with Michael Venus in in Tokyo.
00:28:37.220 --> 00:28:39.299
Best moment of my career, hands down.
00:28:39.460 --> 00:28:43.299
Like um New Zealand's a very Olympic-centric country.
00:28:43.379 --> 00:28:51.619
We've I've been mad about the Olympics since I was a kid, and we always outperform uh the size of our country in terms of how many medals we get.
00:28:51.700 --> 00:28:54.180
So that yeah, the Olympics is always a big deal in New Zealand.
00:28:54.259 --> 00:29:05.220
And Mike and I actually we went to the Rio Olympics and we had match points in the third set tiebreaker against Nesta and uh Poshpassou in the first round and lost.
00:29:05.539 --> 00:29:08.259
Uh, and we were absolutely devastated.
00:29:08.339 --> 00:29:11.220
And I think they went on and played for bronze.
00:29:11.460 --> 00:29:15.539
Uh, and and we felt like if we got past them, we would have had a good chance of going deep.
00:29:15.779 --> 00:29:22.019
So we actually vowed to each other in Rio, we need to come back to an Olympics and do better.
00:29:22.259 --> 00:29:27.619
Um and then Tokyo was very strange with COVID.
00:29:27.859 --> 00:29:31.059
You know, it was delayed for a year and uh no crowds.
00:29:31.220 --> 00:29:35.539
The New Zealand team was being very, very strict about protocols.
00:29:35.619 --> 00:29:38.980
So we were wearing a mask everywhere, indoors, outdoors.
00:29:39.059 --> 00:29:48.500
Um, it was all pretty uncomfortable and not the sort of Olympic atmosphere you'd hoped for, because everyone was just being so careful.
00:29:48.980 --> 00:29:57.299
Um and also um a little extra sort of colour on this.
00:29:57.460 --> 00:30:07.539
Um, the tour had been back on for about a year by then, and I hadn't had a chance to go home for a long, long time.
00:30:07.619 --> 00:30:12.420
Uh, New Zealand, its borders were shut, and I couldn't get into a quarantine hotel.
00:30:12.579 --> 00:30:22.339
So I'd been essentially hotel to hotel on the road for like 12, 13 months by that stage, and I was exhausted and burnt out.
00:30:22.500 --> 00:30:32.500
The guy I'd been playing with for a long time, who I thought we were sort of going to go through to retirement together, had split with me at the start of the grass, which was like a month before the Olympics.
00:30:32.659 --> 00:30:39.940
And so I was just in this like one of the darkest head states I've I'd ever been in uh on tour.
00:30:40.420 --> 00:31:00.659
And actually, the the week before I went to the Olympics, I I knew I was in a really bad mental space, and um I went to my in-laws' house, which is a couple hours north of New York, and just put my tennis bag in the closet and didn't look at it for a week just to try to sort of hit refresh.
00:31:01.619 --> 00:31:16.019
So I got to Tokyo not having hit many balls, but trying to sort of mentally get in the right space and um did some really great work with a mental skills guy from the New Zealand team.
00:31:16.259 --> 00:31:28.500
Uh and I didn't tell Mike, my partner, that I was in this state, but uh he and I also had some really open, honest conversations about our doubles games and where we struggled and what our strengths were.
00:31:28.579 --> 00:31:39.700
And you know, we we play against each other all the time on tour, so I think it was a big step for us that we let our guards down that much to try and sort of do something for New Zealand.
00:31:40.339 --> 00:31:44.980
And then um, yeah, come come the bronze medal match.
00:31:45.059 --> 00:31:56.180
We'd got absolutely trounced in the semis by um Croatia, Shilich and and um Dodig, they just from the first ball were just on and just smashed us.
00:31:56.659 --> 00:32:03.220
Um Silich that day was an example of a serious player who can hit big, who just like hit it through us.
00:32:03.779 --> 00:32:18.899
Um and after that match, we went out and were on the practice court for about two and a half hours until dark, just like we've got one more shot at this, and how can we avoid what happened today?
00:32:19.059 --> 00:32:45.779
And I think the work that we did then and the preparation that we did for pressure moments, and like actually drilling down on very specific plays that we were going to use when pressure points came in and practicing those serves, and then practicing like the net player reacting to those serves based on who we were playing the next day, really put the hours in and the following day played very well, got tight for sure, but like played through the tightness.
00:32:46.500 --> 00:33:02.980
And um Randall ended up running away with it in the in the second set, and someone sent me a video of the last four points where we just both just like on fire, like four amazing finishes in a row against serve.
00:33:03.539 --> 00:33:31.220
Um and when it finished, uh one of the best moments of my life, and the thing that the thing that happened for me was obviously like elation, like euphoria, like holy crap, with we're bringing home a medal for New Zealand, but also just like massive relief because for the two weeks I've been there, I'd been suppressing this um this darkness.
00:33:31.379 --> 00:33:36.819
And it was like I like I want to do everything I possibly can to perform as well as I can during this.
00:33:36.980 --> 00:33:40.019
So I'm just pushing this down, pushing, pushing, pushing down.
00:33:40.180 --> 00:33:44.339
And then when we finished, it was like I didn't have to suppress that anymore.
00:33:44.420 --> 00:33:58.819
And it all just like all came out, and I was just like a sobbing wreck for 20, 30 minutes, and I'll always I'll always hate Mike for the fact that he never shed a single tear after we won that that medal.
00:33:58.899 --> 00:34:02.819
And I I was just an absolute wreck, and he was just like laughing at me.
00:34:03.059 --> 00:34:07.379
Um but uh but yeah, I guess we all handle things differently.
00:34:07.460 --> 00:34:12.019
But yeah, it was um it was it was extremely emotional, and I still get emotional thinking about it.
00:34:12.340 --> 00:34:13.220
That's amazing.
00:34:13.380 --> 00:34:14.099
What a story.
00:34:14.180 --> 00:34:15.220
Thanks for sharing.
00:34:15.380 --> 00:34:29.220
Um, yeah, I talked with uh just as you were going through that, it reminded me of my conversation, I think two years ago with Martillo Rivolo, and he talked about winning Rolling Garros during those two weeks.
00:34:29.300 --> 00:34:38.500
He he was so like locked in and in this like mental state of you know clarity and always turned on.
00:34:38.579 --> 00:34:45.460
And he he actually got physically like sick, like he had a cold a few days after winning um because he like let it down.
00:34:45.539 --> 00:34:48.500
It felt like more of an emotional thing.
00:34:48.740 --> 00:34:55.780
Um but it's it's interesting hearing these stories on of how players like react after the fact, right?
00:34:55.860 --> 00:35:00.980
Um, and what all is going on for them uh mentally and physically.
00:35:01.220 --> 00:35:03.300
Um talked about go ahead.
00:35:03.539 --> 00:35:05.460
Um I'm really not surprised.
00:35:05.780 --> 00:35:13.139
I think it's very common for a lot of athletes, I think tennis players in particular, to get sick in the offseason.
00:35:13.380 --> 00:35:24.259
And I've heard that there's a physiological reason for it where our cortisol levels are spiked for so long because we're just in the stress of tournament after tournament after tournament.
00:35:24.500 --> 00:35:35.860
And then when you give yourself permission to relax in the two weeks of holiday you get at the end of the year, then your cortisol drops massively and your immune system drops with it.
00:35:35.940 --> 00:35:41.460
It's like, oh finally, I don't have to have my guard up, and then then you get sick.
00:35:41.539 --> 00:35:49.539
And so often your the time that you're looking forward to, the two weeks of holiday you get, you're sick most of the time, and then you've got to start preseason again.
00:35:49.699 --> 00:35:52.420
But yeah, part of the grind.
00:35:52.739 --> 00:35:53.300
Yeah.
00:35:53.619 --> 00:35:57.219
Um, you you mentioned the pressure moments a few times.
00:35:57.539 --> 00:36:00.500
What are some keys to performing well under pressure?
00:36:00.659 --> 00:36:11.619
A lot of people ask me, you know, I people I'll get emails or messages on Instagram and they'll say, like, Will, I'm struggling with 10-point tiebreakers or tight matches, and I tend to double fault.
00:36:11.699 --> 00:36:15.539
What are some of the things that you did to help you yourself in those moments?
00:36:16.500 --> 00:36:27.699
Yeah, did quite a lot of work, but especially during the Olympics, before the Olympics on this stuff, because it meant so much to me, I knew I'd get nervous when it came to the pressure moments.
00:36:28.019 --> 00:36:40.579
And the first big thing is I've seen some players, some players I've I've played with as doubles partners, do everything they can not to acknowledge that they're nervous.
00:36:41.139 --> 00:36:43.699
And for me, that's a terrible mistake.
00:36:43.860 --> 00:36:50.259
I think that's probably a terrible, terrible mistake for most people, and I didn't see it work with the partners I played with.
00:36:50.579 --> 00:37:00.820
Um so for me, the big first step is acknowledging that you're nervous, and the second step is understanding that that's normal.
00:37:01.059 --> 00:37:03.460
Like, of course you're nervous.
00:37:03.699 --> 00:37:15.779
If you're playing in something that feels high stakes to you, that's you're gonna get nervous because the stakes are high, and that's a normal human reaction, and even if you might not see it on the outside, everyone gets nervous.
00:37:15.940 --> 00:37:21.619
Like the best players in the world will still get nervous if they're trying to close out a Grand Slam final or whatever it is.
00:37:21.940 --> 00:37:26.900
So, first is acknowledging it, second is accepting it and understanding that it's normal.
00:37:27.139 --> 00:37:31.619
And then the third step is well, okay, I've still got a job to do.
00:37:31.779 --> 00:37:36.259
Like it's it's fine that I'm nervous, being nervous is normal.
00:37:36.500 --> 00:37:37.779
Now, what do I do about it?
00:37:37.940 --> 00:37:42.420
Well, okay, it's five all in the super tiebreaker, and I'm serving.
00:37:42.980 --> 00:37:52.019
I served 50 times earlier during the match, and regardless of how well or how poorly that went, I know that I can serve and get it in the box, so let's just go and do it.
00:37:52.179 --> 00:38:04.420
So the the first two steps are sort of the um having empathy for yourself steps, and then the third step is just shut up and and do your job.
00:38:04.659 --> 00:38:07.699
Like for me anyway, it was like get a little hard on yourself.
00:38:07.779 --> 00:38:10.259
Like, no, I'm I'm I'm still here to do a job.
00:38:10.420 --> 00:38:13.139
I want to win, I'm gonna go and do my bloody job.
00:38:13.380 --> 00:38:26.500
Um, and I can remember actually specifically in in that bronze medal match, I think I was serving and we were up a break at like 4-2 or 3-2 or something like that, and I got really nervous.
00:38:27.619 --> 00:38:36.900
And people watching thought that I was relaxed and under the surface, like I could hardly move my arm.
00:38:37.380 --> 00:38:51.860
But going through that thing before, literally going through those steps before every serve that I did meant that we got through the game, got through the match, and it looked sort of like a smooth surface at the end of the day.
00:38:52.099 --> 00:38:59.699
But yeah, I guess I guess the biggest takeaway is everyone gets nervous and it's normal, and then just go and do your job anyway.
00:39:00.579 --> 00:39:07.460
Yeah, I think that's a big misconception that like a lot of pro players just don't feel nerved or they somehow block out nerves.
00:39:07.539 --> 00:39:10.900
But I like the way you phrase that to acknowledge it and accept it first.
00:39:11.779 --> 00:39:17.380
Um two more doubles questions, and then we'll move on to um HIA.
00:39:17.940 --> 00:39:20.900
Uh you mentioned that you like to get to the net.
00:39:21.139 --> 00:39:25.219
Uh you it sounds like you're more comfortable up at the net.
00:39:25.539 --> 00:39:33.380
What are some tips you have for people listening to either improve their volleys or be more effective as a net player in doubles?
00:39:37.219 --> 00:39:41.940
Oh, it's gonna be difficult to generalize without showing.
00:39:43.539 --> 00:39:45.300
So we can start with servers partner.
00:39:45.779 --> 00:39:46.500
How about that?
00:39:47.139 --> 00:39:47.380
Okay.
00:39:57.300 --> 00:40:00.900
I think service partners generally are standing too far away from the net.
00:40:01.539 --> 00:40:04.420
If you're a service partner, you're in an aggressive position.
00:40:04.579 --> 00:40:08.900
So even if it's a second serve, you should trust that your partner's gonna hit a decent second serve.
00:40:09.059 --> 00:40:15.699
And particularly for first serve, your job as service partner is to find that return and finish it.
00:40:15.860 --> 00:40:20.579
Like as many points as possible, your job is to just finish the point then and there.
00:40:20.980 --> 00:40:34.500
Um, so I think a general thing that I've seen is you should be close enough to the net that you could essentially touch it with your racket with one diagonal step forward.
00:40:34.739 --> 00:40:45.940
So you want to be able to step forward diagonally to cut off the ball and not hit the net, but be as close as possible to the net that your angles are increased as much as they possibly can be.
00:40:46.019 --> 00:41:00.420
So by angles, I mean you can hit the ball down, you can hit the board ball either way, and if it comes fizzing just over the top of the net, if you sort of like just get your racket in the way and shank it, then it's got the highest chance of going back over the other side.
00:41:00.739 --> 00:41:03.460
Um yeah, that's the biggest one that I've seen.
00:41:03.779 --> 00:41:05.059
Yeah, I like that.
00:41:05.219 --> 00:41:06.980
Um, what what about returner's partner?
00:41:07.219 --> 00:41:08.659
That's a little tougher one.
00:41:10.019 --> 00:41:17.460
Returner's partner is tougher because it requires a lot more um reading of the game in anticipation.
00:41:17.539 --> 00:41:19.539
So, service partner, you should go in with a plan.
00:41:19.699 --> 00:41:23.139
Your partner's going to try to serve to this spot and you're going to move to this spot.
00:41:23.300 --> 00:41:25.300
These are the zones that you have to cover.
00:41:25.380 --> 00:41:29.940
And if they're in your zone, there's no excuse to not get a racket on it and try to finish the point.
00:41:30.179 --> 00:41:33.940
As returner's partner, you're in a reactive position.
00:41:34.099 --> 00:41:40.820
And so you're depending on your partner being able to get a good racket on the ball.
00:41:40.980 --> 00:41:49.219
Uh, some people like signing to know where their partner is going to return, if they're going to try to return down the line or liable cross-court.
00:41:49.699 --> 00:41:56.340
With the better returning partners I played with, we did that because they had a little more control over that, regardless of where the serve was.
00:41:56.579 --> 00:42:08.820
Um, but either way, I guess the generalizable tip would be when you see the quality of return, react accordingly.
00:42:08.900 --> 00:42:17.300
So if you see a good return that gets past the service partner, then your first move should be straightforward to the net.
00:42:17.860 --> 00:42:29.380
So, and and the reason to do that is if you see the return going past the net player, your job is to cut off as many angles as possible for the person who's gonna hit that next shot.
00:42:29.539 --> 00:42:32.259
And the the quickest way to do that is to move forward.
00:42:32.340 --> 00:42:34.019
That's just simple geometry.
00:42:34.179 --> 00:42:36.259
If you move forward, you cut down angles.
00:42:36.500 --> 00:42:51.699
Um, if it's a a poorer quality return, so if you see it sort of popping up for the server, or if you see the server's partner is gonna get a racket on it, then it's holding position and getting ready to try to react and deflect and stay on the point.
00:42:52.019 --> 00:42:57.380
Um yeah, that one's that one's a little more interesting and a little more reactive.
00:42:57.699 --> 00:42:59.300
Yeah, for sure.
00:42:59.699 --> 00:43:11.539
Um so last doubles related question, not a strategy one, but um, this is when I ask all of my guests uh what needs to happen to make Pro Doubles more popular?
00:43:15.219 --> 00:43:16.259
I've got a few ideas.
00:43:16.659 --> 00:43:17.860
Big topic, yeah.
00:43:19.779 --> 00:43:20.659
A few things.
00:43:20.820 --> 00:43:28.659
So the product changes too much, and by that I mean there's too much changing of partners.
00:43:30.420 --> 00:43:36.579
People can support a singles player for uh two decades because they're the same person throughout.
00:43:36.900 --> 00:43:46.659
If you have doubles teams changing three times a year or every year, then you don't have the longevity to build a following over time.
00:43:46.739 --> 00:43:48.420
You you can't accumulate.
00:43:48.659 --> 00:43:57.940
Um, and I think I mean people from certain countries will follow their country men, their country people.
00:43:58.420 --> 00:44:21.219
Um but when you think about guys like the Bryans or like Cabal Farah, you know, the these partnerships that last for a long time that are both from the same country, I think they they have managed to leverage that into much better profiles, better deals, um, and just more interest and hype in general because of that longevity.
00:44:21.380 --> 00:44:35.539
And so I would be a fan of there being rules around, for example, if you partner with someone at the start of the year, you have to finish the year out unless there's injury or something like that.
00:44:35.699 --> 00:44:45.699
Something to make the product of doubles teams more certain and one that you can you know follow throughout an entire season.
00:44:46.340 --> 00:44:51.860
The other, which is a simple one, um, is just colours.
00:44:52.019 --> 00:45:01.139
Like I understand that different clothing sponsors have different things that they require players to wear, but like looking like a team, I think, is a good one, also in terms of product.
00:45:01.380 --> 00:45:14.500
Um, and then there's this huge chicken egg argument that I I am really biased around, but I just don't know how it would be best dealt with is the marketing of it.
00:45:14.739 --> 00:45:19.940
Um Obviously, doubles players get a tiny portion of the attention of singles players.
00:45:20.259 --> 00:45:29.460
I do think it might be anathema to say this on a doubles focused podcast, but like the top singles players in the world are the best tennis players in the world.
00:45:29.619 --> 00:45:34.739
Um, and I think a lot of them, if they focused on doubles, would be amongst the top doubles players in the world.
00:45:34.820 --> 00:45:36.420
It's definitely not one-to-one.
00:45:36.739 --> 00:45:49.139
Like doubles skill set and understanding is it's a separate skill set, but the top singles guys are just such good tennis players that I think they could they could become top doubles players.
00:45:49.460 --> 00:45:57.380
So I I don't believe that it should be absolutely equal, but I think the disparity is way too big at the moment.
00:45:57.619 --> 00:46:02.420
And I think a lot of people really like playing and watching doubles, especially at the club level.
00:46:02.500 --> 00:46:03.699
It's a great game.
00:46:03.940 --> 00:46:16.099
And so how do you give more exposure lights um storytelling to doubles in a way that's going to interest people?
00:46:16.900 --> 00:46:18.900
And that requires investment.
00:46:19.139 --> 00:46:37.139
Um, so you the ATP would have to take a punt on it, and I think they've sort of been leaning further and further the opposite way of like doubles is just sort of a useless appendage, or maybe the only value is in as a scheduling tool so that there's no dead TV time or whatever.
00:46:37.300 --> 00:46:39.300
I think that really undersells doubles.
00:46:39.539 --> 00:46:50.900
And the the two product things that I spoke about, I think would help with uh being able to market doubles and get teams more well known and get more people interested and wanting to come to tournaments to see doubles teams.
00:46:51.059 --> 00:46:56.420
So yeah, it's like it's hard to get the first bit of momentum to build that flywheel.
00:46:56.659 --> 00:47:01.380
But but I think once it's going, like, yeah, people people love playing and watching doubles.
00:47:01.940 --> 00:47:03.380
Yeah, that's what I've found.
00:47:03.539 --> 00:47:13.059
I think a lot of uh a lot of people who listen to this podcast or follow our Instagram channel tend to, you know, uh there's a market out there for it.
00:47:13.139 --> 00:47:16.340
Like they they do like to watch it, and it those are some great ideas.
00:47:17.539 --> 00:47:18.340
Um awesome.
00:47:18.420 --> 00:47:20.259
Well, let's talk about high impact athletes.
00:47:20.500 --> 00:47:29.219
So most tennis players, most doubles players, uh I I guess doubles especially um because the doubles players aren't paid as highly.
00:47:29.460 --> 00:47:39.139
They have another career after they retire from tennis, and most of them work in tennis, but you went kind of a different direction.
00:47:39.940 --> 00:47:42.739
Why did you start HIA?
00:47:44.739 --> 00:48:03.380
Well, initially I started high impact athletes because uh COVID had hit and the tour had stopped, and at the start of 2020, I made a personal commitment to give eight percent of what I earned on tour that year to charity.
00:48:03.699 --> 00:48:08.980
But then the tour stopped, and eight percent of zero dollars is zero.
00:48:09.139 --> 00:48:14.579
Like I, you know, if I wasn't on a tennis court winning tennis matches, then I wasn't earning money.
00:48:14.820 --> 00:48:23.940
And so I thought, well, I I want to figure out how to make an impact in in some way, and if I can't give more to charity, then what else can I do?
00:48:24.179 --> 00:48:42.099
And I realized actually, so going back to what we spoke about earlier, um in 2015 when I when I started focusing on doubles, that's the first year where I actually made made money from tennis, where I covered my expenses and and you know was able to save a little bit.
00:48:42.420 --> 00:48:49.300
And that year I got this really strong urge to give back because tennis is really selfish.
00:48:49.380 --> 00:49:00.900
You take from the world, you take from your coaches, from your parents, from your community, and that's necessary, but I it never sat well with me as the sort of person I wanted to be in the world.
00:49:01.059 --> 00:49:04.340
And so I wanted to give back, but I didn't trust the charities I'd grown up around.
00:49:04.420 --> 00:49:12.420
So I just like went deep into Google and tried to find charities that I trusted to do good things with what I gave them.
00:49:12.579 --> 00:49:24.099
And it led me to the space of effective giving, which in a nutshell is just a deep amount of research, really rigorous research research that identifies the charities that do the most good with each dollar that you give them.
00:49:24.259 --> 00:49:28.340
Uh, that really resonated with me as sort of like a high-performance way to give.
00:49:28.420 --> 00:49:34.420
And so I started giving to some of those charities and like made a percentage pledge and built that up over time.
00:49:34.900 --> 00:49:43.860
And I'd been doing that since 2015 through to 2020, and yeah, had built that percentage pledge up to 8% that year and felt really good about it.
00:49:44.099 --> 00:49:47.940
But the realization I had during COVID was I'd never spoken about it.
00:49:48.179 --> 00:50:00.820
And and it's it feels uncomfortable to speak about this stuff because you don't want people to think that you're just like virtue signaling and trying to make out like you're this great person.
00:50:01.619 --> 00:50:23.219
But the uncomfortable part of the realization was even if I was uncomfortable talking about it, if by talking about it one other person decided to support these incredible charities, then that would be a huge amount of good done in the world and like people's lives being changed just for me getting over my own discomfort.
00:50:23.460 --> 00:50:27.779
And so when I did the equation of like, should I do this, shouldn't I?
00:50:27.860 --> 00:50:30.259
I was like, absolutely, I should start talking about this.
00:50:30.420 --> 00:50:32.420
And that was what led to high impact athletes.
00:50:32.659 --> 00:50:39.059
Was I have a relatively small profile, but you know, I've been lucky enough to get to know some of the biggest tennis players in the world.
00:50:39.300 --> 00:50:46.340
If I resonate with this approach to charity of like doing high performance giving, then maybe other athletes will too.
00:50:46.579 --> 00:50:54.739
Um and so yeah, I just like figured out how to make a really basic website and started speaking to some tennis players about it.
00:50:54.980 --> 00:51:09.059
Um and launched it publicly December 2020, and never can never thought it would be a job or a I thought it was just gonna be me pestering my friends on the tennis tour about these charities.
00:51:09.380 --> 00:51:19.539
And very quickly, by the Aussie Open of the next year, so like two months down the line, it was obvious that there was a real appetite for this approach to charity.
00:51:20.019 --> 00:51:29.219
And so fast forward to today, and we have over 200 athletes in the in the community, and those are the ones we work more closely with.
00:51:29.300 --> 00:51:32.179
We have sort of over 400 athletes in the wider community.
00:51:32.420 --> 00:51:39.139
We've raised something like six to seven million for the charities that that we support.
00:51:39.619 --> 00:51:42.980
Um and it's been just an incredible journey.
00:51:43.300 --> 00:51:53.139
And one other thing I'll say about HIA, because I I guess it's it's different to most charities, and it's important because it's different.
00:51:53.380 --> 00:51:56.099
We never take anything from the athletes.
00:51:56.259 --> 00:52:04.820
So if an athlete decides to give to these charities, or if their fans decide to give to the charities, 100% of that donation goes to where it does the most good.
00:52:04.980 --> 00:52:06.500
That's always been the case.
00:52:06.739 --> 00:52:14.900
Because I never wanted to look at my peers and say, like, hey, you should give to this charity, and I'm gonna take 5% and put it in my back pocket.
00:52:15.219 --> 00:52:20.980
So it's always been pure, we we have no incentive other than to help athletes do a lot of good in the world.
00:52:21.059 --> 00:52:23.940
Like we don't get a kickback from the charities or anything like that.
00:52:24.099 --> 00:52:26.340
Um, it's it's all completely independent.
00:52:26.500 --> 00:52:27.619
So that's really important.
00:52:27.779 --> 00:52:38.019
And what that means is that we've had to fund operations separately through a group of high net worths who believe in what we're building and in and the thing that we're trying to do in the world and some grant funding.
00:52:38.259 --> 00:52:43.699
Um, and it's yeah, it's grown to the stage where um we've had to grow as a team.
00:52:43.860 --> 00:52:52.259
And so it actually became really easy for me when I retired to be like, yeah, I want to spend all of my time doing this.
00:52:52.340 --> 00:52:53.619
I'm really passionate about it.
00:52:53.779 --> 00:52:58.579
I started it with money from my own back pocket trying to make it a real thing.
00:52:58.739 --> 00:53:09.139
Um, and now the fact that you know we've we've got a team of I think it's about eight full-time people now, and we're we're having to grow further because of this huge partnership.
00:53:09.300 --> 00:53:15.619
We last year we became the global charity partner for HIROX, which is like a fitness um fitness race thing.
00:53:15.699 --> 00:53:24.019
So we're gonna have like 50,000 people through this mass participation um project that we're doing alongside the elite athlete stuff.
00:53:24.259 --> 00:53:43.460
So yeah, there's um there's been a lot going on, and we're we're a small team with massive goals, and it's what I've been pouring myself into since since I retired, and I feel very lucky because I've I've not felt a um sort of a void or anything.
00:53:43.619 --> 00:53:47.940
I've just been super busy since um since I stopped playing tennis.
00:53:48.739 --> 00:53:49.539
That's awesome.
00:53:49.699 --> 00:53:51.380
That's a that's a really cool story.
00:53:51.539 --> 00:53:56.019
Um I love this idea of effective charities.
00:53:56.179 --> 00:54:03.300
Uh it's something that I um I I'd never thought about until I think it was like 10 years ago or something.
00:54:03.380 --> 00:54:12.179
I I used to listen to the the Tim Ferris show and they had Will McCatkill on, who I think kind of started a lot of the this concept.
00:54:12.900 --> 00:54:16.659
Um you're shaking your head, so I'm sure you're super familiar with him.
00:54:16.739 --> 00:54:31.779
Uh but I remember listening to that and thinking like, oh, like every time a charity is asking me for money, I have no idea how much of that money is actually going towards the you know, the thing that they say that it's going towards, right?
00:54:32.900 --> 00:54:33.940
Yeah, exactly.
00:54:34.179 --> 00:54:38.420
So I'm I'm really glad that you've uh you came across this on your own.
00:54:38.579 --> 00:54:46.739
It's actually not common, I think, for for people to have had that thought of actually like what does if I give, what does it actually do?
00:54:47.059 --> 00:54:54.420
And the whole the whole approach that we take to charity is let me let me use an analogy.
00:54:54.579 --> 00:55:03.219
If if you were going to invest in a business, you would want to deeply understand every lever that that business uses to create a good outcome.
00:55:03.300 --> 00:55:05.619
And you would want a return on your investment.
00:55:06.019 --> 00:55:08.900
It should be exactly the same in the charity space.
00:55:09.139 --> 00:55:17.059
The difference is in the business world, if you don't do a good job, you go bankrupt and you go out of business, and we don't hear of those businesses ever again.
00:55:17.219 --> 00:55:25.779
In the charity world, it just has to have enough people who don't understand or um you know are giving without really thinking about giving.
00:55:25.860 --> 00:55:31.539
And these these nonprofits can just trundle along year after year after year without really making an impact.
00:55:31.699 --> 00:55:34.579
And there are something like 10 million nonprofits in the world.
00:55:34.659 --> 00:55:37.860
So it's really difficult to find the very, very best ones.
00:55:38.099 --> 00:55:43.539
But the research organizations that we work with spend tens of thousands of hours a year finding the best ones.
00:55:43.779 --> 00:55:54.259
And if you direct your giving to the best ones, it can literally be tens, hundreds of times more impactful than even just the average charity at doing good in the world.
00:55:54.579 --> 00:56:15.059
So I like if I was to think about the larger vision for high-impact athletes, it would be that everyone in the world who has the capacity to give thinks really carefully about what their giving is going to do and where it goes to before they pull the trigger on it.
00:56:15.300 --> 00:56:28.340
Because if you think carefully about it and do a bit of research, then just by directing to the best charities, we can, as a whole, as a world, we can just do multiples more good without even giving more.
00:56:28.500 --> 00:56:34.739
So that alone would just be a massive, massive improvement in the quality of the world.
00:56:34.900 --> 00:56:42.900
And I just think, yeah, like not enough people know that that's a choice that they make, um, or that there are better options available.
00:56:43.380 --> 00:56:44.900
Yeah, yeah, that's amazing.
00:56:45.139 --> 00:56:47.300
It makes so much sense, like once you realize it.
00:56:47.380 --> 00:56:49.860
But a lot of people don't think about it.
00:56:50.739 --> 00:56:54.420
Yeah, a lot of people don't think about it or they they just haven't been educated on it.
00:56:54.579 --> 00:56:58.019
But um anyways, uh uh this was a ton of fun to talk about.
00:56:58.099 --> 00:57:02.900
Um, Marcus, I'm gonna link to Gabby's games for good.
00:57:03.300 --> 00:57:05.619
We're gonna try to get Gabby on here soon.
00:57:05.699 --> 00:57:11.539
I know she's super busy uh over in Europe um trying to win more games so that we can donate more money.
00:57:11.699 --> 00:57:14.500
Uh Tennis Tribe is gonna do$2 per game.
00:57:14.659 --> 00:57:18.099
She said she expects to win 600 games this year.
00:57:18.259 --> 00:57:23.619
Um, so people can check that out and uh yeah, donate there.
00:57:23.699 --> 00:57:26.900
Um any final request to the audience before we hop off here?
00:57:27.539 --> 00:57:34.579
Just a big thank you for um for giving me the time and being able to talk about Gabby's campaign and also for high-end backed athletes.
00:57:34.659 --> 00:57:36.420
And also thank you for the contribution.
00:57:36.500 --> 00:57:37.139
That's really cool.
00:57:37.219 --> 00:57:38.420
You're leading the way.
00:57:38.659 --> 00:57:52.500
Um I think 100,000 is a big goal for Gabby, but we have some activations that are coming uh during, especially during the Toronto tournament, um, which is sort of her her home masters or premiere or whatever they call it.
00:57:52.579 --> 00:57:54.259
Um so that'll be exciting.
00:57:54.500 --> 00:57:58.980
And yeah, just the the ask is just to check out check out her campaign.
00:57:59.059 --> 00:57:59.779
It's beautiful.
00:57:59.940 --> 00:58:02.900
It's you know, every$12.50 is a month of safety.
00:58:02.980 --> 00:58:08.340
And if you think about what that actually means in the real world, that's pretty incredible.
00:58:08.579 --> 00:58:12.900
Um so yeah, check it out if you feel motivated to give.
00:58:13.380 --> 00:58:16.820
We and Gabby and the world would really appreciate it.
00:58:16.900 --> 00:58:20.500
Um, but yeah, just really appreciate the time to talk about this stuff.
00:58:20.659 --> 00:58:24.820
And I forgot how much I miss uh talking and thinking about doubles.
00:58:25.219 --> 00:58:26.579
Yeah, it was a lot of fun.
00:58:26.659 --> 00:58:27.619
Thanks, Marcus.
00:58:27.860 --> 00:58:28.900
Thanks a lot, With.