درباره این اپیزود
Welcome back to "Writing While Distracted" with your NeuroSpicy writing coach, Brenda Murphy. In this episode, we dive deep into the revision process, exploring how to effectively collaborate with beta readers, developmental editors, and copy editors to refine your manuscript.
We begin by addressing Rejection Sensitivity Dysphoria (RSD), a common challenge for neurodivergent writers, and discuss strategies to manage these intense feelings during the revision process. Brenda shares personal insights and practical advice on how to maintain healthy professional relationships while navigating RSD.
Next, we break down the distinct roles of beta readers, developmental editors, and copy editors. Learn how each contributes to the manuscript's development, from providing reader-centric feedback to strategic big-picture edits and meticulous language polishing.
Brenda also offers best practices for working with your revision team, including how to find the right beta readers, the importance of clear communication, and the value of respecting their time and input. For those working with sensitivity readers, she emphasizes the importance of compensating them and valuing their unique perspectives.
Whether you're a seasoned writer or just starting out, this episode is packed with tips to help you create the best possible version of your manuscript. Subscribe, leave a review, and join us next time as we continue to explore the writer's journey.
Until then, keep writing, keep revising, and take care of yourself.
Plays Well With Others Show notes
Sign up for my newsletter for free resources for Writers:
https://brendalmurphy.com/resources-for-writers/
Follow me on my socials for quick tips and updates: https://www.instagram.com/writinghwhiledistracted/
Struggling with character development? Check out my free character building workbook: https://BookHip.com/HDPNDMX
Here is the free resource 60 Ways to Show Character Arc: https://dl.bookfunnel.com/xjcaam4085
This podcast is all about structure: https://www.podbean.com/eas/pb-ckhgh-167fd45
Eileen Cook’s Build Better Characters: https://eileencook.com/non-fiction/
Debra Dixon Goal Motivation and Conflict: http://www.debradixon.com/index.html
Save the Cat: https://savethecat.com/books
Writing While Distracted Blog on Story Structure/Story ARC https://blog.writingwhiledistracted.com/?p=2295
My podcast about revisions and editing: Mastering Revisions: Turning Rough Drafts into Polished Gems https://www.podbean.com/eas/pb-xhk2p-167fa2b
Sandra Gerth’s fantastic book Show Don’t Tell: https://www.amazon.com/Show-Dont-Tell-descriptions-characters-ebook/dp/B01LXFJ0AC/
MIlianote
Scrivener
https://www.literatureandlatte.com
Revisions and Editing Steps
To recap the process, I use to get my rough as hell draft to a finished product to send to an editor, publisher, or out on submission is:
- Round1: Revisions: structure, pacing, character arcs, genre conventions, continuity, and attending to items that require research.
- Round 2: Language: word choice, refining prose, pacing, dialogue, scene descriptions, character descriptions, continuity. *At this point I send it to my beta readers.
- Round 3: Proofing: Suggestions from Beta readers, grammar, spelling, punctuation, copy edits, line edits formatting for submission or publication. Copy edits, line edits.
- Round 4: Final proofing read through before submission or publishing.
در این اپیزود
یادداشت ها را نشان دهید 🔗
رونوشت 🔗
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:11.120
Music.
00:00:10.967 --> 00:00:13.967
Welcome back to Writing While Distracted. I'm Brenda Murphy,
00:00:14.127 --> 00:00:18.247
your NeuroSpicy writing coach, and today we're going to dive into working with
00:00:18.247 --> 00:00:20.227
beta readers, developmental editors,
00:00:20.567 --> 00:00:24.967
and copy editors during the revision process, or as I like to call it,
00:00:25.007 --> 00:00:26.987
learning how to play well with others.
00:00:27.447 --> 00:00:33.727
Stay tuned while we talk about best practices while working with others to make your manuscript shine.
00:00:44.907 --> 00:00:48.327
Before we get into the tips for working with beta readers, copy editors,
00:00:48.467 --> 00:00:52.787
and developmental editors, I want to discuss an issue that many neurodivergent
00:00:52.787 --> 00:00:57.047
folks struggle with, and that's called rejection sensitivity dysphoria.
00:00:57.567 --> 00:01:00.047
Also, you'll see it labeled as RSD.
00:01:00.887 --> 00:01:07.927
RSD manifests as an extreme response to perceived or actual rejection, criticism, or failure.
00:01:08.107 --> 00:01:12.707
It can can lead to significant feelings of sadness, worthlessness, and anxiety.
00:01:13.647 --> 00:01:18.827
RSD can make it hard to maintain relationships and to stick with projects and pursue goals.
00:01:19.967 --> 00:01:24.887
Rejection, sensitivity, dysphoria can very much affect your relationships with
00:01:24.887 --> 00:01:28.727
folks you ask to review your work, like beta readers, copy editors,
00:01:28.867 --> 00:01:33.987
and developmental editors, or agents if you're submitting your manuscript for representation.
00:01:34.767 --> 00:01:40.567
If you are aware that RSD is an issue for you, You need to take some time to
00:01:40.567 --> 00:01:43.067
work out a plan to deal with those intense feelings.
00:01:43.727 --> 00:01:46.767
I'm not going to tell you to not have those feelings because you're going to
00:01:46.767 --> 00:01:52.627
have them, but having a plan in place to deal with them will do a lot to head
00:01:52.627 --> 00:01:54.027
off potential problems.
00:01:54.727 --> 00:01:59.147
I'm not a mental health professional, but I have benefited greatly from working
00:01:59.147 --> 00:02:02.727
with some to come up with strategies to cope with RSD.
00:02:03.387 --> 00:02:06.647
So do yourself a favor if you have that opportunity or
00:02:06.647 --> 00:02:09.467
if you know this is an issue or maybe you
00:02:09.467 --> 00:02:13.167
don't know that's an issue but maybe it comes up with you while
00:02:13.167 --> 00:02:16.047
you're working with your beta readers your
00:02:16.047 --> 00:02:20.567
copy editors your developmental editors or your potential agents if it does
00:02:20.567 --> 00:02:27.447
step back assess what you're worrying about assess what you're reacting to and
00:02:27.447 --> 00:02:32.407
get some help with dealing with those feelings find someone to talk to work
00:02:32.407 --> 00:02:35.347
out a plan Because they may not go away,
00:02:35.507 --> 00:02:37.787
but in order for you to be successful,
00:02:38.027 --> 00:02:41.467
you're going to have to develop a plan to deal with those feelings.
00:02:41.707 --> 00:02:46.467
And that goes for your personal relationships, too, as well as professional relationships.
00:02:46.887 --> 00:02:50.527
So get ahead of the curve. If you know it's an issue for you,
00:02:50.687 --> 00:02:55.747
work to sort those things out before you start working with your beta readers,
00:02:55.947 --> 00:03:00.867
your developmental editors, your potential agents, your.
00:03:01.560 --> 00:03:06.340
Now on to discussing how to work with those people you've asked to review your manuscript.
00:03:06.820 --> 00:03:10.280
Each of those people plays a different role in the revision process.
00:03:10.900 --> 00:03:15.880
So beta readers are like your early test audience. They're the people that are
00:03:15.880 --> 00:03:18.520
going to give you feedback on the story from a reader's perspective.
00:03:19.060 --> 00:03:23.640
They'll note any confusion they have during the reading, whether or not they're
00:03:23.640 --> 00:03:28.220
emotionally engaged, and they may point out some continuity errors.
00:03:28.220 --> 00:03:31.960
Not all beta readers pick up on those, but if they do, be very grateful.
00:03:32.180 --> 00:03:33.880
They'll address pacing issues.
00:03:34.240 --> 00:03:39.660
They basically can answer questions that you have as a writer about how your
00:03:39.660 --> 00:03:44.940
work reads to a reader, which is a very different thing. Writers read differently than readers.
00:03:45.780 --> 00:03:49.040
Readers usually are reading for pleasure and enjoyment. Writers,
00:03:49.040 --> 00:03:52.020
sometimes we read for pleasure, but a lot of times we're reading books to see
00:03:52.020 --> 00:03:55.240
how they're put together so we can figure out how to do that ourselves.
00:03:55.960 --> 00:04:02.480
We also, as neurodiverse people, are really great at filling in the blanks in our own head.
00:04:02.580 --> 00:04:06.460
However, those things that are in our head don't always make it to the page.
00:04:06.620 --> 00:04:10.580
And while something may make perfect sense to you as a writer,
00:04:10.660 --> 00:04:14.400
because you know the backstory and you know all the ins and outs and details,
00:04:14.720 --> 00:04:17.060
it may not make sense to your reader.
00:04:17.240 --> 00:04:21.780
Beta readers are going going to help you help your story make sense to someone
00:04:21.780 --> 00:04:23.520
who doesn't know all of those things.
00:04:24.360 --> 00:04:27.060
Now, what does a developmental editor do and how are they different?
00:04:27.620 --> 00:04:29.360
Developmental editors are professionals.
00:04:29.800 --> 00:04:35.020
They are people that you hire to focus on your manuscript from a big picture
00:04:35.020 --> 00:04:36.840
aspect, like a helicopter view.
00:04:37.240 --> 00:04:42.200
They're going to look at structure, plot holes, character development, and pacing.
00:04:42.580 --> 00:04:48.000
Their feedback should be strategic and guide you on how to make those manuscripts,
00:04:48.714 --> 00:04:52.094
corrections. Now, I didn't say that they would fix your manuscript.
00:04:52.314 --> 00:04:57.694
That's up to you. But their suggestions should be concrete enough that you're
00:04:57.694 --> 00:05:02.534
able to take those and interpret them and fix things in your manuscript.
00:05:02.734 --> 00:05:08.874
Say you've got a big plot hole and they feel like you need to address the gap.
00:05:09.194 --> 00:05:13.934
Say that you don't have enough clues sprinkled in the beginning of your novel
00:05:13.934 --> 00:05:18.034
if if you're writing a murder mystery, for anyone to solve it if they're not you.
00:05:18.474 --> 00:05:22.534
Those are the kinds of things that a developmental editor will address.
00:05:23.374 --> 00:05:28.234
Now, what is a copy editor? A copy editor is going to zero in on your language,
00:05:28.974 --> 00:05:31.834
your grammar, style consistency, and your mechanics.
00:05:32.734 --> 00:05:37.454
Sometimes you will find copy editors that also do the work of developmental
00:05:37.454 --> 00:05:40.974
editors, and this is very, very common in small presses.
00:05:41.194 --> 00:05:43.794
They don't have two separate editors to work with you.
00:05:44.114 --> 00:05:48.074
Your copy editor may be your acquiring editor in that they're an editor that
00:05:48.074 --> 00:05:51.394
you send a manuscript to in hopes of having it published.
00:05:51.734 --> 00:05:55.674
They may function as a developmental editor in that they're going to work with
00:05:55.674 --> 00:06:01.914
you on your manuscript to get it more polished and have any of the big items
00:06:01.914 --> 00:06:04.454
fixed, structure, details, plot holes.
00:06:04.614 --> 00:06:08.354
And then they're also going to address your language. They wear many hats.
00:06:08.354 --> 00:06:13.494
It's going to depend on what your particular publishing house,
00:06:13.534 --> 00:06:17.294
if you're working with one, has as their business model.
00:06:17.554 --> 00:06:22.814
Now, if you hire an editor, if you are an indie person, indie publishing person,
00:06:22.854 --> 00:06:27.214
and you want to hire an editor, you need to be very clear on what skills they
00:06:27.214 --> 00:06:31.494
bring to the table and what you're asking them to do with your manuscripts.
00:06:32.384 --> 00:06:35.964
That will solve 90% of the issues that come from confusion.
00:06:36.444 --> 00:06:39.504
Ask them if they also are functioning as a developmental editor.
00:06:39.844 --> 00:06:43.984
Also be clear about what it is you want. If you feel confident in your story,
00:06:44.084 --> 00:06:47.784
if you feel like you and your beta readers have worked out all of those structural
00:06:47.784 --> 00:06:51.664
issues and that it reads pretty well and you feel confident in that and you
00:06:51.664 --> 00:06:54.184
only want someone to look at it from a language perspective,
00:06:54.604 --> 00:06:56.964
that's where you can go with just a copy editor.
00:06:56.964 --> 00:07:02.044
But if you feel like you may need a professional to help you address some of those issues,
00:07:02.324 --> 00:07:06.764
if you don't have a writer friend that you can work with and you feel like or
00:07:06.764 --> 00:07:10.724
maybe you don't want to burden them or maybe you wouldn't feel comfortable or
00:07:10.724 --> 00:07:15.484
you want someone who doesn't have any kind of an emotional investment in your work,
00:07:15.624 --> 00:07:19.064
that's one of the best reasons to hire professional people.
00:07:19.064 --> 00:07:22.484
People they don't have an emotional investment
00:07:22.484 --> 00:07:25.404
in your work it remains your work they remain
00:07:25.404 --> 00:07:28.724
professional you remain professional and you sort out
00:07:28.724 --> 00:07:33.944
the things we can be sensitive as neurodiverse people we can be sensitive as
00:07:33.944 --> 00:07:39.764
as authors and creators we're sensitive about what we do we care about it some
00:07:39.764 --> 00:07:47.624
people refer to their books as their babies i don't in particular but i am invested in my work.
00:07:47.844 --> 00:07:51.064
Learning to take critique. Notice I did not say criticism.
00:07:51.884 --> 00:07:53.544
Critique is something that will
00:07:53.544 --> 00:08:01.204
help you improve. Something that is a concrete action you can work on.
00:08:01.384 --> 00:08:07.864
Say, for instance, you repeatedly use the same word in your manuscript.
00:08:08.004 --> 00:08:13.824
Say that you have 400 instances sentences of just, or that, or so,
00:08:13.924 --> 00:08:18.524
your editor will point that out to you and say, that's too many,
00:08:18.624 --> 00:08:20.484
and you need to fix your sentences.
00:08:21.004 --> 00:08:23.784
I have a really bad habit of using the word that.
00:08:24.886 --> 00:08:30.946
In fact, it's so bad, usually at the end of my manuscript, I do a global delete
00:08:30.946 --> 00:08:36.986
of the word that because it's easier for me to go back and put them in where they belong.
00:08:37.046 --> 00:08:42.106
It'll become painfully evident in a sentence if you need the word that versus
00:08:42.106 --> 00:08:45.326
you have that in there and you didn't need it in the first place that the sentence
00:08:45.326 --> 00:08:46.786
reads perfectly okay without it.
00:08:47.526 --> 00:08:51.206
So those are the kinds of things you want to keep in mind when you're choosing
00:08:51.206 --> 00:08:53.226
who to work with at what point.
00:08:53.346 --> 00:09:00.846
I work with beta readers before I send my manuscript off to be either gone over
00:09:00.846 --> 00:09:03.146
by a copy editor or to an acquiring editor.
00:09:03.586 --> 00:09:08.546
That is where I use my beta readers. Some people use beta readers in the very
00:09:08.546 --> 00:09:10.226
early stages of their manuscript.
00:09:10.346 --> 00:09:14.146
Some people send their beta readers one chapter at a time. I don't.
00:09:14.206 --> 00:09:18.246
It's going to depend on what works for you and what works for your beta reader.
00:09:18.586 --> 00:09:23.306
Now let's talk about some best practices when working with beta readers,
00:09:23.386 --> 00:09:24.706
and I've touched on a few of those.
00:09:25.186 --> 00:09:27.826
Think of them as your first line of defense.
00:09:28.646 --> 00:09:32.486
Hopefully they're the people that are going to pick up on those big mistakes
00:09:32.486 --> 00:09:35.286
that will totally throw your novel off.
00:09:35.746 --> 00:09:39.666
Pacing issues, plot holes, whether or not your characters are engaging.
00:09:40.166 --> 00:09:43.586
Do they like your characters? Do they hate your characters? Do they wish your
00:09:43.586 --> 00:09:46.386
characters were a little different or they wish something else would happen.
00:09:46.966 --> 00:09:51.906
Those are the kinds of things that you want your beta readers to bring to the table.
00:09:52.146 --> 00:09:56.866
I usually, if I have doubts about a story, sometimes I'll just take a couple
00:09:56.866 --> 00:10:01.026
of pages and I may send them off to my beta reader and say, I'm not sure about this.
00:10:01.486 --> 00:10:06.906
What do you think? And then use that information to go forward to figure out
00:10:06.906 --> 00:10:10.206
whether or not that's where I want to go with that story.
00:10:10.666 --> 00:10:13.966
It's going to depend on how closely you work with people. it's going to depend
00:10:13.966 --> 00:10:17.246
on if you have one beta reader or if you have multiple beta readers.
00:10:17.446 --> 00:10:20.806
You can have different beta readers for different things. I write romance,
00:10:21.046 --> 00:10:22.606
paranormal, and horror.
00:10:23.186 --> 00:10:28.846
Not everybody likes to read those things. So I have separate people I work with
00:10:28.846 --> 00:10:30.226
for separate books I write.
00:10:30.246 --> 00:10:33.466
I write high fantasy too. I have a different beta reader for that.
00:10:33.666 --> 00:10:37.566
If you can find people that read in your genre, want to read for you,
00:10:37.746 --> 00:10:44.026
like your style, and are willing to put the work in and actually address questions
00:10:44.026 --> 00:10:46.986
that you send to them, treasure those people.
00:10:47.886 --> 00:10:50.866
Compensate them for their time in some way if you can, you know,
00:10:50.866 --> 00:10:52.646
give them a signed copy of the book.
00:10:52.746 --> 00:10:56.906
If you happen to be able to go meet them someplace, take them to dinner,
00:10:57.086 --> 00:10:59.406
whatever, be appreciative.
00:10:59.586 --> 00:11:03.566
They're doing this as a volunteer to help you make your work better.
00:11:03.566 --> 00:11:09.046
And that kind of service is so remarkable and so wonderful.
00:11:10.239 --> 00:11:14.519
I would not publish half the books I've published if it were not for the amazing
00:11:14.519 --> 00:11:15.959
beta readers that I work with.
00:11:16.299 --> 00:11:19.239
When I was talking about finding beta readers that read specific things,
00:11:19.359 --> 00:11:23.779
so one of the first things you want to do is make sure you find a beta reader in your genre, okay?
00:11:23.839 --> 00:11:27.679
Make sure they're familiar with the expectations so they can give you relevant feedback.
00:11:28.199 --> 00:11:32.119
You're going to want to limit the number of beta readers. Some people use between,
00:11:32.419 --> 00:11:35.519
you know, some people use five, some people use one.
00:11:35.939 --> 00:11:42.299
I have found that one to three is a good number for me, typically only two per manuscript.
00:11:42.419 --> 00:11:46.299
Otherwise, I get too much feedback and I have no idea what the heck I'm going to do with all of it.
00:11:46.379 --> 00:11:49.519
But if you get the same feedback from two different beta readers,
00:11:49.759 --> 00:11:53.199
pay attention to that because that's probably something you really do need to
00:11:53.199 --> 00:11:55.359
fix if more than one person notices it.
00:11:55.859 --> 00:11:58.959
Again, it's up to you. It's your manuscript, but pay attention.
00:11:59.219 --> 00:12:02.719
These people are being very gracious and offering you their opinions.
00:12:03.159 --> 00:12:07.959
Most Most of them read volumes of books. They're readers.
00:12:08.379 --> 00:12:12.959
They like reading. They don't want to write themselves, although some of my
00:12:12.959 --> 00:12:14.659
beta readers are also writers.
00:12:14.859 --> 00:12:18.079
Sometimes I trade beta reading with other writers.
00:12:18.259 --> 00:12:22.539
Typically, it's not people who write in my genre, although I'll read their genre.
00:12:22.659 --> 00:12:24.559
So I do a lot of nonfiction beta reading.
00:12:24.759 --> 00:12:29.279
I will do horror beta reading. Even though I write horror, I've read enough
00:12:29.279 --> 00:12:34.259
to know whether or not I like this book and And I feel like I can offer constructive
00:12:34.259 --> 00:12:36.299
criticism around horror novels.
00:12:36.599 --> 00:12:41.699
So work that out. It's a really amazing system when it works.
00:12:42.119 --> 00:12:45.259
As I said, when you're working with beta readers, be clear about what you want.
00:12:45.699 --> 00:12:49.159
Don't just send it to them and say, hey, what do you think? If you have questions
00:12:49.159 --> 00:12:53.839
like, is this character's behavior reasonable or unrealistic?
00:12:54.679 --> 00:12:57.899
You know, those are the kinds of questions. What did you think of this?
00:12:57.999 --> 00:13:01.739
What did you think of that? Does this make sense to you? those kinds of things
00:13:01.739 --> 00:13:04.579
that you personally have questions about your manuscript, you're just a little
00:13:04.579 --> 00:13:09.119
unsure or you're not confident in, make sure that you send them those questions.
00:13:09.319 --> 00:13:15.139
If you have specific questions, also do your best to send as clean a copy as
00:13:15.139 --> 00:13:16.199
you can to your beta readers.
00:13:16.339 --> 00:13:20.439
They shouldn't have to slug through your very, very, very messy first draft.
00:13:20.959 --> 00:13:22.339
That's not what they're there for.
00:13:22.879 --> 00:13:29.019
They should be able to sit down and read it as close to book form as you can
00:13:29.019 --> 00:13:32.819
make it, because that's where you want them to help you.
00:13:32.839 --> 00:13:36.079
Now, if it's you're working with beta readers in the beginning part of your
00:13:36.079 --> 00:13:41.419
story, even if you're sending them a chapter to look at, do at least a basic
00:13:41.419 --> 00:13:43.039
edit before you send that to them.
00:13:43.737 --> 00:13:46.457
Most beta readers, again, work out of the goodness of their heart.
00:13:47.097 --> 00:13:51.917
So respect their time, respect their input, respect them as human beings.
00:13:52.317 --> 00:13:57.657
If you're angry over something they write back to you, don't respond in the moment.
00:13:58.297 --> 00:14:05.597
If it becomes apparent that you are not working well with your beta reader, don't be ugly about it.
00:14:06.137 --> 00:14:10.097
The writing community can be a very small community at times.
00:14:10.477 --> 00:14:13.177
And don't be ugly to anyone.
00:14:13.737 --> 00:14:19.517
Don't write a rude response. Don't. Don't. Now, if you get a beta reader that
00:14:19.517 --> 00:14:25.797
responds to you in a very cruel, unkind, unnecessarily rude way,
00:14:26.017 --> 00:14:28.277
you don't have to keep working with them.
00:14:28.657 --> 00:14:31.557
Run that through your RSD filter.
00:14:32.197 --> 00:14:37.857
Are you overreacting? It is perfectly acceptable to have a neutral party read
00:14:37.857 --> 00:14:41.597
if you've gotten an email that you think is really rude and you've gotten feedback
00:14:41.597 --> 00:14:44.557
that you don't like or you think is harsh,
00:14:44.777 --> 00:14:50.557
it is perfectly acceptable to have someone else read that, you know,
00:14:50.557 --> 00:14:52.177
redact the beta reader's name.
00:14:53.077 --> 00:14:57.557
Don't post it in a social media forum, but contact a close friend and say,
00:14:57.637 --> 00:14:58.597
hey, I got this feedback.
00:14:58.737 --> 00:15:01.237
Do you think it's out of line? Or do you think it's harsh?
00:15:01.557 --> 00:15:05.177
Or what do you think about the tone? That kind of thing.
00:15:05.977 --> 00:15:11.217
Having someone else's eyes on things that come to you if you know you struggle
00:15:11.217 --> 00:15:14.237
with RSD is super helpful.
00:15:15.097 --> 00:15:19.557
I want you to stay open-minded about your beta reader's feedback. You ask them for help.
00:15:20.340 --> 00:15:23.200
You are not a perfect, none of us are a perfect writer.
00:15:23.320 --> 00:15:29.020
We all require a lot of help and a lot of input from other people to make our
00:15:29.020 --> 00:15:30.500
books be the best that they can be.
00:15:30.880 --> 00:15:32.880
We need that input.
00:15:33.760 --> 00:15:38.680
No one writes in isolation. And all of those people that you see that you think are amazing writers,
00:15:39.380 --> 00:15:44.480
have oftentimes a huge group of people behind them helping them turn out really
00:15:44.480 --> 00:15:49.600
amazing books and take advantage of those extra people's.
00:15:50.740 --> 00:15:53.060
Opinions, their suggestions,
00:15:53.720 --> 00:15:58.640
their observations to make your book shine, to make it be the best it can be
00:15:58.640 --> 00:16:00.000
for the most amount of people.
00:16:00.480 --> 00:16:04.000
Because that's what you want. You want it to appeal to a broad range of readers.
00:16:04.740 --> 00:16:09.080
Don't argue with your beta readers' feedback. You can offer an explanation if
00:16:09.080 --> 00:16:13.720
they ask a question, or if something's unclear, you can say,
00:16:13.860 --> 00:16:17.380
did you see this part here? Because sometimes beta readers are reading in a hurry.
00:16:17.500 --> 00:16:21.800
They may have missed the first part of an explanation, and they have questions later.
00:16:21.920 --> 00:16:26.000
But that can be a signal to you that maybe you need to bring those things closer
00:16:26.000 --> 00:16:30.360
together so someone doesn't forget from one page to the next what's happening.
00:16:30.680 --> 00:16:35.700
But don't argue with them. There's no point in it. They have their opinion,
00:16:35.940 --> 00:16:38.620
and an opinion is something you are allowed to have.
00:16:38.860 --> 00:16:43.440
You don't have to justify it unless you're getting paid to offer a professional
00:16:43.440 --> 00:16:46.560
opinion, and most beta readers are not paid.
00:16:46.960 --> 00:16:52.700
So if that's the case, don't argue. They don't have to justify to you their opinions.
00:16:53.220 --> 00:16:57.320
You ask them for it. Listen to it. Take what works for you.
00:16:57.720 --> 00:17:01.960
If it doesn't apply or you don't agree with it, you don't have to follow it.
00:17:02.020 --> 00:17:06.220
There's nothing that says you have to follow it, but at least look at it and consider it.
00:17:06.280 --> 00:17:12.200
Don't reject it outright unless it's something that would massively change your
00:17:12.200 --> 00:17:15.220
entire story and you're not ready to do a complete rewrite.
00:17:15.760 --> 00:17:20.360
If it's not working with you and your beta reader, it's okay to move on to another beta reader.
00:17:21.214 --> 00:17:27.294
Now, a word about sensitivity readers. Sensitivity readers fall somewhere between
00:17:27.294 --> 00:17:30.934
a beta reader and a developmental editor.
00:17:32.054 --> 00:17:37.754
Beta readers are not typically paid for their work.
00:17:38.154 --> 00:17:43.614
Sensitivity readers should be compensated in some way for their time.
00:17:43.714 --> 00:17:49.054
And you employ sensitivity readers when you're writing outside your lived experience,
00:17:49.054 --> 00:17:53.834
and you want to ensure that your manuscript, to the best of your ability,
00:17:54.074 --> 00:18:01.214
is reasonable in your writing about those experiences outside your own.
00:18:01.394 --> 00:18:03.354
And this can be for anything.
00:18:03.594 --> 00:18:08.794
I have done beta reading for people who are neuroatypical.
00:18:08.954 --> 00:18:13.414
I have done beta reading for people who suffer from PTSD.
00:18:14.074 --> 00:18:19.834
I have done beta reading for people who have been, other writers writing people
00:18:19.834 --> 00:18:21.574
who've dealt with anorexia.
00:18:21.774 --> 00:18:26.034
It doesn't have to be about race, although if you are writing about someone
00:18:26.034 --> 00:18:31.134
who is outside of your community and outside of your race,
00:18:31.254 --> 00:18:36.974
it is a very good idea to have someone read over your manuscript that is part of that community.
00:18:37.934 --> 00:18:40.694
That's my suggestion. you don't have to take it,
00:18:40.754 --> 00:18:48.014
but don't be a lazy writer and rely upon stereotypes or what you've seen on
00:18:48.014 --> 00:18:53.754
television movies to give you an idea of what any marginalized group is like.
00:18:53.994 --> 00:18:57.934
This goes for language, this goes for appearance, this goes for interpersonal
00:18:57.934 --> 00:18:59.874
relationships within that group.
00:19:00.214 --> 00:19:08.334
It's a very easy thing to make an error in writing about groups that are outside your own experience.
00:19:09.294 --> 00:19:14.374
Now, if you hire a sensitivity reader and they give you feedback on your manuscript
00:19:14.374 --> 00:19:18.534
and suggest you make changes, please listen to them.
00:19:18.574 --> 00:19:21.374
You are paying them or compensating them for their service.
00:19:21.974 --> 00:19:26.474
They also have a different experience than you do. And listen to their experience.
00:19:27.074 --> 00:19:32.854
The flip side of that is one sensitivity reader does not represent an entire group.
00:19:33.014 --> 00:19:37.354
If someone has hired me as a sensitivity reader to read their book that deals
00:19:37.354 --> 00:19:41.414
with a woman who has post-traumatic stress disorder,
00:19:41.594 --> 00:19:47.414
and they want to know if they've written about this in what is a way that truly
00:19:47.414 --> 00:19:48.914
represents the experience,
00:19:49.254 --> 00:19:54.334
and I give my opinions about how they've written it, that's based on my experience
00:19:54.334 --> 00:19:56.094
as a person dealing with that.
00:19:57.007 --> 00:20:01.827
And what problems that I have and have faced with that issue.
00:20:02.587 --> 00:20:08.347
And so that's all I can offer. I can't tell you what someone who has PTSD from
00:20:08.347 --> 00:20:13.947
a different experience, what their reactions might be. I can't give you that.
00:20:14.107 --> 00:20:16.247
I can't speak for everybody with PTSD.
00:20:16.507 --> 00:20:20.507
I only know how it applies to me. And every sensitivity reader that comes to
00:20:20.507 --> 00:20:25.307
your book can only bring their own knowledge and personal experience.
00:20:26.267 --> 00:20:32.527
So remember that. And remember, if you are later criticized for something in
00:20:32.527 --> 00:20:38.167
your novel that someone else in a marginalized group thought that you didn't do a good job with,
00:20:38.707 --> 00:20:42.507
even if you had a sensitivity reader, you don't throw that up as an excuse.
00:20:42.787 --> 00:20:46.407
The best way to handle it, I've found over the years, is to say,
00:20:46.447 --> 00:20:49.087
thank you so much for taking the time to give me your feedback.
00:20:49.927 --> 00:20:52.987
That's all you have to say. You don't have to say anything else.
00:20:53.467 --> 00:20:56.907
And let it go and move on. If you've done your due diligence,
00:20:57.087 --> 00:21:01.307
if you have done the best that you've done, accept the criticism,
00:21:01.547 --> 00:21:04.867
accept the critique, move on.
00:21:05.007 --> 00:21:12.067
Because you can't account for everyone, although you can do your best to try
00:21:12.067 --> 00:21:18.227
and write the best book, especially when writing about marginalized groups, that represents them.
00:21:18.807 --> 00:21:22.187
So that's all I'm going to say about sensitivity It is a deep subject.
00:21:22.307 --> 00:21:25.087
I may end up doing an entire podcast on that.
00:21:25.247 --> 00:21:29.827
I have some friends that work as sensitivity readers and I may do like a roundtable
00:21:29.827 --> 00:21:32.647
discussion or bring them on one at a time to talk about that in the future.
00:21:32.747 --> 00:21:37.947
If that's something you'd like to hear or like to have happen on the podcast,
00:21:38.147 --> 00:21:42.347
please leave me a comment down below and let me know if you'd like a special
00:21:42.347 --> 00:21:45.567
podcast just about working with sensitivity readers. Thanks.
00:21:46.387 --> 00:21:50.747
So we've gone over, I think we've exhausted the subject for beta readers.
00:21:50.887 --> 00:21:52.847
So let's move on to developmental editors.
00:21:53.787 --> 00:21:57.747
Now, developmental editors are professionals. They are typically people who
00:21:57.747 --> 00:21:59.167
have been trained as editors.
00:21:59.447 --> 00:22:09.347
They have behind them an education and experience that you can hopefully rely
00:22:09.347 --> 00:22:13.287
on to help you get your novel where it needs to be.
00:22:13.847 --> 00:22:18.207
With developmental edits, oftentimes you should be ready for big changes.
00:22:18.247 --> 00:22:20.627
I know people that have worked with editors before.
00:22:21.592 --> 00:22:26.512
I know people that have worked with developmental editors that will get a 20-page
00:22:26.512 --> 00:22:35.812
or 30-page document of notes and changes that need to be made in their novel to move it forward.
00:22:36.052 --> 00:22:40.892
And that's more common if you work with an agent. You will oftentimes get 30
00:22:40.892 --> 00:22:43.272
or 40 pages or if you work with one of the big publishing houses.
00:22:43.512 --> 00:22:46.792
I personally have never gotten that many pages back.
00:22:46.792 --> 00:22:49.612
I the publishing houses that
00:22:49.612 --> 00:22:53.152
I work with tend to make their notes within the document
00:22:53.152 --> 00:22:56.152
I don't get a formal huge letter that
00:22:56.152 --> 00:22:59.772
says these are the things you need to do to fix your book so we can publish it I
00:22:59.772 --> 00:23:02.472
kind of like it that it's built into the document because it
00:23:02.472 --> 00:23:06.712
lets me address them one at a time however if I've gotten notes from my editor
00:23:06.712 --> 00:23:12.092
that says I need to fix some big thing I go back and fix that big thing and
00:23:12.092 --> 00:23:17.732
I don't I don't argue about it with with my editor because Because I've worked
00:23:17.732 --> 00:23:20.452
with my one editor I have worked with for 12 years.
00:23:20.652 --> 00:23:25.072
I understand her. I trust her. She understands me. We work really well together.
00:23:25.352 --> 00:23:29.952
And so that works. If I was working with a new editor and they gave me a huge
00:23:29.952 --> 00:23:36.972
list of suggestions, again, depending on what my goals were and what I felt like was reasonable.
00:23:37.452 --> 00:23:41.612
I might question some of those at this point in my career.
00:23:41.692 --> 00:23:46.512
As a new writer, I might not question them. It just depends on where you are.
00:23:46.832 --> 00:23:50.252
And you're going to have to read through the notes, keep an open mind,
00:23:50.372 --> 00:23:56.012
and see if it becomes, see if the changes are going to drastically change your novel.
00:23:56.332 --> 00:23:59.152
Will it still be the story that you wanted to tell?
00:23:59.792 --> 00:24:03.872
Or if you can take those suggestions and still tell the story that you want to tell.
00:24:03.952 --> 00:24:06.492
And that's only something that you're going to be able to do once you get those
00:24:06.492 --> 00:24:10.752
edits. But you need to, before you start, clarify your vision,
00:24:10.852 --> 00:24:14.432
at least to yourself, of what story it is that you want to tell.
00:24:15.052 --> 00:24:19.292
And make sure that your editor understands that, particularly if you are hiring
00:24:19.292 --> 00:24:20.392
the developmental editor.
00:24:20.572 --> 00:24:24.432
Now, a lot of this is going to be out of your control if you work with a publishing house.
00:24:24.952 --> 00:24:28.472
They're going to set you up with whatever editor they feel is best for you or
00:24:28.472 --> 00:24:29.632
whoever has an open slot.
00:24:29.832 --> 00:24:32.712
And that's how it's going to roll. So you're going to have to figure out and
00:24:32.712 --> 00:24:36.792
be clear in your own mind, what kinds of things do you want in this book?
00:24:36.872 --> 00:24:39.792
What story are you telling before you start working with that editor?
00:24:40.432 --> 00:24:44.892
And you can ask for a letter. A lot of times they'll just send it to you as a letter.
00:24:44.972 --> 00:24:50.472
I like the notes in the document itself because sometimes I have moved on to the next book.
00:24:50.512 --> 00:24:53.272
I'm in the middle of writing the next book and I may not remember all the details
00:24:53.272 --> 00:24:54.752
for the books that they're editing.
00:24:55.012 --> 00:25:01.292
So for me, notes within the text or next to it, like if you have Word and you
00:25:01.292 --> 00:25:03.032
have tracks changes down the side.
00:25:03.152 --> 00:25:07.292
I prefer comments and notes in the text directly so I can respond to them.
00:25:08.161 --> 00:25:12.621
Every editor will have a way that they like to work. And if you've hired them,
00:25:12.801 --> 00:25:14.941
they're going to already have their way.
00:25:15.081 --> 00:25:17.921
You can request that they work differently. But again, you hired them knowing
00:25:17.921 --> 00:25:22.301
what they were doing. You can ask for a sample edit from a developmental editor.
00:25:22.421 --> 00:25:24.961
If you're hiring someone independently, ask for a sample edit.
00:25:25.061 --> 00:25:26.981
Ask for a sample of how they work.
00:25:27.721 --> 00:25:32.081
You're paying them money to help you fix your book. And as a consumer,
00:25:32.241 --> 00:25:36.481
you have every right to ask, what does this entail? What am I getting for the money?
00:25:37.101 --> 00:25:40.401
What are the deadlines? You know, are you going to stick to deadline?
00:25:40.541 --> 00:25:42.101
How long is this going to take you?
00:25:42.721 --> 00:25:46.121
When can I expect to get my manuscript back?
00:25:46.921 --> 00:25:51.901
And those kinds of things, working out payment, whether you are paying everything
00:25:51.901 --> 00:25:56.241
up front, which I don't recommend, whether you pay at halfway points,
00:25:56.361 --> 00:25:59.261
like if they've done half the manuscript, if you break the payments up,
00:25:59.681 --> 00:26:02.801
you know, you're going to have to figure out what works for you and what you
00:26:02.801 --> 00:26:05.041
feel secure with in hiring people.
00:26:05.581 --> 00:26:13.001
It's best to, once you get those edits back, to ask questions about anything you don't understand.
00:26:13.181 --> 00:26:16.861
If you have a question about any of the edits or suggestions, ask them.
00:26:17.241 --> 00:26:22.101
Be clear about what they want before you do a whole bunch of work that didn't
00:26:22.101 --> 00:26:24.301
meet the criteria of what they wanted anyway.
00:26:25.101 --> 00:26:29.461
That's just a waste of everyone's time. When you get those edits back,
00:26:29.681 --> 00:26:32.141
work in stages to address them.
00:26:32.701 --> 00:26:36.081
Especially if you've gotten a long letter, if you've gotten a 30-page letter,
00:26:36.881 --> 00:26:41.761
don't try to address all those changes all at once. It will exhaust you.
00:26:41.941 --> 00:26:46.881
Be mindful of your spoon level. If you're one of those people that works with
00:26:46.881 --> 00:26:49.981
spoons, how many spoons do you have?
00:26:50.121 --> 00:26:52.801
And if you're not familiar with spoon theory, go look it up.
00:26:52.861 --> 00:26:54.341
I'm sure you'll figure it out from there.
00:26:54.661 --> 00:26:57.821
It's such a common term. I'm fairly certain everybody knows what I'm talking about.
00:26:57.881 --> 00:27:03.661
If you You have to guard your energy if you're working with a long-term disability
00:27:03.661 --> 00:27:06.481
in some fashion. You know, break these up.
00:27:06.901 --> 00:27:11.681
Or your mental health, break these edits up. It's overwhelming to get a 30-page
00:27:11.681 --> 00:27:14.561
document back that says these are all the things you need to fix in your manuscript
00:27:14.561 --> 00:27:17.621
that you've already worked so hard on.
00:27:18.061 --> 00:27:23.741
So again, RSD rearing its ugly head along with a healthy dose of imposter syndrome
00:27:23.741 --> 00:27:26.001
can pop up like I'm never going to be a writer.
00:27:26.121 --> 00:27:29.861
I can't believe all these changes. If you talk to anyone who's a professional
00:27:29.861 --> 00:27:34.401
writer who has worked over any length of time, they will tell you that we've
00:27:34.401 --> 00:27:38.941
all had that time where there were so many things that they had to fix in their manuscript,
00:27:39.121 --> 00:27:43.121
they wondered whether they should just throw it in the trash and start over. Don't do that.
00:27:43.701 --> 00:27:46.801
Work to get the fixes in, but take your time doing it.
00:27:47.520 --> 00:27:51.640
Use track changes, of course, so that you always have a copy.
00:27:51.760 --> 00:27:56.640
Now, what I do when I get my edits back is I make a document,
00:27:56.780 --> 00:28:04.300
a new document, and I label it as the edits from and whoever the edits are from that I'm working on.
00:28:04.500 --> 00:28:07.980
Because that way, I do the same thing with beta readers. Like if I get beta
00:28:07.980 --> 00:28:11.320
reader suggestions back, edits back, and they've made notes,
00:28:11.320 --> 00:28:16.220
we use track changes too, I label that document with that particular beta reader's
00:28:16.220 --> 00:28:18.740
name so that I know who gave me that feedback.
00:28:19.040 --> 00:28:22.940
Do the same with your developmental editor. Put the date on it.
00:28:23.040 --> 00:28:28.180
I save a new copy each time I work on it. So I have a progression of the edits.
00:28:28.740 --> 00:28:33.800
When all the edits are in, I make one final copy, final edits,
00:28:34.100 --> 00:28:36.340
the name of the book and the editor.
00:28:36.480 --> 00:28:39.520
And then I send it back to them because if you're working in a publishing house,
00:28:39.640 --> 00:28:40.880
that's what's going to happen next.
00:28:41.140 --> 00:28:47.180
You may have two or three rounds of edits before it is finalized to go to be published.
00:28:47.900 --> 00:28:52.220
Trust the process. This is going to be the hardest thing to do the very first
00:28:52.220 --> 00:28:58.260
time you work with an editor because, one, you're super excited that your book
00:28:58.260 --> 00:28:59.840
is actually going to be published.
00:29:00.220 --> 00:29:04.520
Now, for indie published folks, it's kind of a different scenario,
00:29:04.600 --> 00:29:09.640
but I imagine there's the same excitement that you're working with a professional
00:29:09.640 --> 00:29:13.220
who's going to make your book better that is going to lead to publication.
00:29:13.760 --> 00:29:19.340
If you're working with a publishing house, it is a huge deal to know that your
00:29:19.340 --> 00:29:23.580
book is finally going to be published because once you start working with an
00:29:23.580 --> 00:29:28.540
editor, once you've signed that contract, there are a lot of things that are out of your control.
00:29:29.542 --> 00:29:33.842
And you're going to be working on their timeline. That's something you really
00:29:33.842 --> 00:29:36.502
need to pay attention to when you're doing your revisions.
00:29:37.282 --> 00:29:40.442
Don't miss deadlines if you can help it.
00:29:40.562 --> 00:29:45.062
Now, if you get something back and the deadline is absolutely unreasonable.
00:29:45.882 --> 00:29:49.282
Write back, explain why the deadline is unreasonable.
00:29:49.522 --> 00:29:54.122
Say they only give you a week to address 30 pages of edits, and you can then
00:29:54.122 --> 00:29:57.722
write back and say, I'm going to need more time and explain why.
00:29:58.222 --> 00:30:03.522
And then this is the good part. You can write back to them and say, this is unreasonable.
00:30:03.922 --> 00:30:10.642
I cannot address these in this amount of time. And then propose a new deadline.
00:30:11.342 --> 00:30:15.222
Don't just leave it open-ended and say, I need more time.
00:30:15.522 --> 00:30:20.662
I need more time to the editor might mean I need another week.
00:30:21.022 --> 00:30:24.122
To you, it might mean I need another month.
00:30:24.442 --> 00:30:29.382
So be clear in exactly how much time you're going to need. If you've had some
00:30:29.382 --> 00:30:31.362
crisis happen in your family, it can happen.
00:30:31.642 --> 00:30:35.782
If you've had some other thing happen that's going to delay you,
00:30:35.902 --> 00:30:40.882
always, always, always communicate with your editor and let them know what's
00:30:40.882 --> 00:30:42.942
going on with the deadline, what's going on with you.
00:30:43.002 --> 00:30:48.242
The worst thing you can do is miss a deadline and make them track you down.
00:30:48.342 --> 00:30:51.542
It will not endear you to any editor you're working with.
00:30:51.982 --> 00:30:56.862
So stay on top of your deadlines, work them as best you can,
00:30:56.982 --> 00:31:01.542
and ask for more time respectfully and politely. Remember, it's a business relationship.
00:31:02.262 --> 00:31:06.822
If you need more time, don't just blow it off and assume you're going to do it.
00:31:06.862 --> 00:31:10.842
So be very, very clear in how much time it's going to take you.
00:31:10.862 --> 00:31:12.702
You may not know how much time it's going to take you.
00:31:13.102 --> 00:31:17.142
Err on the side of asking for more time if you feel like you're going to need it.
00:31:18.002 --> 00:31:23.022
Now, working with copy editors, And a lot of the copy editing stuff sort of
00:31:23.022 --> 00:31:27.162
overlaps with developmental editors was, like I said, in a small publishing house.
00:31:27.422 --> 00:31:31.422
The copy editor, developmental editor are often the same thing.
00:31:31.762 --> 00:31:35.682
Acquiring editor, that means the editor that reads manuscripts as they come
00:31:35.682 --> 00:31:40.922
in and decides after they go through a lengthy process whether or not that this
00:31:40.922 --> 00:31:43.942
is a good fit for the publishing house and whether or not to offer you a contract.
00:31:44.747 --> 00:31:51.707
So those hats are often worn by one person. That's how it works with the publishers that I work with.
00:31:51.807 --> 00:31:55.667
The acquiring editor is the developmental editor is the copy editor.
00:31:55.787 --> 00:31:56.587
They're all the same person.
00:31:57.047 --> 00:32:01.967
So finally, working with a copy editor, if you've hired one individually,
00:32:02.047 --> 00:32:03.847
is working with a specialist.
00:32:04.207 --> 00:32:10.687
You want a copy editor that's familiar with your genre and the style guide that you're following.
00:32:10.827 --> 00:32:14.127
Now, if you are working with a publishing house, they will have their own style guide.
00:32:14.747 --> 00:32:19.607
And whether or not you like it, that is what will happen with your book.
00:32:19.707 --> 00:32:20.287
And I'll give you examples.
00:32:21.047 --> 00:32:27.087
Some houses, when you write the word T-shirt, it is spelled T-shirt.
00:32:27.747 --> 00:32:33.227
Some houses, they want you to write T-e-e-s-h-i-r-t, T-shirt.
00:32:33.567 --> 00:32:37.747
It's going to depend on their choices. It's going to depend on what that house uses.
00:32:37.747 --> 00:32:43.227
Uses some houses want you to write kneeled k-n-e-e-l-e-d
00:32:43.227 --> 00:32:46.007
for knelt because they don't use
00:32:46.007 --> 00:32:48.807
the word knelt it will depend on their
00:32:48.807 --> 00:32:52.987
style guide and if you are published with that house you will fix your manuscript
00:32:52.987 --> 00:32:57.327
your copy editor will make those corrections suggestions out to the side you
00:32:57.327 --> 00:33:02.087
will sign off on them because that's the style guide for the house and that's
00:33:02.087 --> 00:33:06.407
what you if you sign on with a publisher that's what you signed up for so you're
00:33:06.407 --> 00:33:08.167
not going to have a lot of that in your control.
00:33:08.567 --> 00:33:13.307
Now, if you have something that you have a request for, I don't like italics
00:33:13.307 --> 00:33:19.967
used in my documents because I had a reader tell me that italics are really hard for her.
00:33:20.067 --> 00:33:27.167
She uses text-to-speech, and italics are really hard for her text-to-speech program to understand.
00:33:27.907 --> 00:33:33.627
So with that in mind, I have reduced the use. I don't use italics in my books.
00:33:34.458 --> 00:33:38.658
If I can help it. But I always have to ask because most style guides want you
00:33:38.658 --> 00:33:42.238
to put internalized dialogue in italics.
00:33:42.478 --> 00:33:46.698
They want you to use words that are outside of the language the book is being
00:33:46.698 --> 00:33:48.838
published in, in italics.
00:33:48.958 --> 00:33:52.998
And usually after I've asked, and I'll say, can you please not do that because
00:33:52.998 --> 00:33:55.778
of these reasons, they usually will agree to that change.
00:33:56.018 --> 00:33:58.178
I've not had anybody refuse me yet.
00:33:58.678 --> 00:34:01.898
So, and again, I don't think it's all speech to text programs,
00:34:02.058 --> 00:34:05.838
but if it's even one and someone took the time to write to me and tell me that,
00:34:05.958 --> 00:34:10.518
I'd like to make my books as accessible as they can be for a wider audience of people.
00:34:10.778 --> 00:34:16.018
So that's what I have asked for. But again, I asked for it. I wasn't demanding
00:34:16.018 --> 00:34:17.318
because you can't demand.
00:34:17.538 --> 00:34:20.758
You've signed a contract with them. They have standards. They want all their
00:34:20.758 --> 00:34:21.998
books to look a certain way.
00:34:22.398 --> 00:34:26.118
So that's how it's going to look. Those things are out of your control.
00:34:26.838 --> 00:34:29.718
You want to polish your first draft.
00:34:30.938 --> 00:34:36.518
Again, copy editors, as acquiring editors, want to know that they're working
00:34:36.518 --> 00:34:43.738
with someone who at least takes the time to make their draft be as correct as it can be.
00:34:43.838 --> 00:34:46.778
Now, they're not expecting something that looks like it's already been to a
00:34:46.778 --> 00:34:49.078
copy editor, although they'd probably be a static.
00:34:49.198 --> 00:34:59.078
They expect it to be at least free of basic errors in spelling and in grammar and in spacing.
00:34:59.078 --> 00:35:07.938
If you look at any house that takes submissions and not requiring agented submissions.
00:35:08.518 --> 00:35:14.818
They will have very clearly stated how they want your manuscript to arrive to
00:35:14.818 --> 00:35:16.798
them. It will have a format.
00:35:16.998 --> 00:35:19.918
They will tell you what type to use a lot of times.
00:35:20.038 --> 00:35:24.098
They will tell you what point, what size type they want you to use.
00:35:24.098 --> 00:35:28.678
They will tell you whether they want the manuscript in the body of the email
00:35:28.678 --> 00:35:31.238
or if they want it as a separate document.
00:35:31.498 --> 00:35:35.518
They will tell you all of those things. They will tell you if they use what
00:35:35.518 --> 00:35:36.978
kind of style guide they use.
00:35:37.078 --> 00:35:42.918
If you are writing a nonfiction article and you're submitting it to a magazine,
00:35:43.118 --> 00:35:46.338
it will tell you what style they want, Chicago manual style,
00:35:46.738 --> 00:35:51.018
APA manual style, whatever. whatever, pay attention.
00:35:51.138 --> 00:35:58.418
The quickest way to hit the rejection pile is to not read the directions that
00:35:58.418 --> 00:36:00.918
are on the submission guidelines.
00:36:01.398 --> 00:36:07.778
And again, remember, most copy editors, most small houses work as acquiring editors.
00:36:07.998 --> 00:36:10.558
So this is your chance to make your first impression.
00:36:11.980 --> 00:36:18.700
If you don't understand something your copy editor has put in the margins of
00:36:18.700 --> 00:36:23.740
your manuscript or suggested that you do, you need to ask for clarification.
00:36:23.960 --> 00:36:26.960
And if you still don't understand, ask them to give you an example.
00:36:27.280 --> 00:36:30.340
Don't ask them to rewrite your text. That's not their job.
00:36:30.520 --> 00:36:35.660
Their job is to make suggestions or to tell you how it would be written correctly, and then you fix it.
00:36:36.100 --> 00:36:39.620
You need to be patient with copy editing. It is a very long,
00:36:39.680 --> 00:36:44.640
tedious process. They are basically looking individually at every single word
00:36:44.640 --> 00:36:49.560
in your manuscript, as well as the manuscript as a whole at its cohesiveness.
00:36:49.860 --> 00:36:57.340
And that takes time. You can also make their job a lot easier after you've signed a contract.
00:36:57.340 --> 00:37:03.740
If you have written a fantasy novel, if you have written any novel where you
00:37:03.740 --> 00:37:06.960
have made up names for people, places, and things,
00:37:07.200 --> 00:37:09.860
you need to have a list that you
00:37:09.860 --> 00:37:12.920
also send your copy editor so that they know if
00:37:12.920 --> 00:37:18.900
you've spelled someone's name in a unique way that that is the spelling and
00:37:18.900 --> 00:37:24.640
not just a typo because that would be really aggravating to go through a manuscript
00:37:24.640 --> 00:37:27.420
and and have them correct something
00:37:27.420 --> 00:37:32.500
that you had spelled a certain way and wanted spelled a certain way.
00:37:32.780 --> 00:37:36.380
And they corrected it because to them it just looked like a typo.
00:37:36.460 --> 00:37:40.600
So keep that list. We talked about having that list, especially if you're writing
00:37:40.600 --> 00:37:44.180
fantasy, science fiction, paranormal, anything that you're making up names for things.
00:37:44.540 --> 00:37:47.760
Have the spelling. If it's not common words, have the spelling.
00:37:47.820 --> 00:37:50.600
Have a list of spelling that you can send to your copy editor.
00:37:50.740 --> 00:37:54.700
They will love you for that because then they don't have to message you back
00:37:54.700 --> 00:37:57.940
and forth and say, well, is it two A's or one A?
00:37:58.300 --> 00:38:03.420
Or where does the Z go? Or I've seen this spelled this way and this many ways
00:38:03.420 --> 00:38:07.120
in the manuscript, three different ways. Which of these do you want?
00:38:07.860 --> 00:38:12.620
So save yourself some time, save them some aggravation, and send that list once
00:38:12.620 --> 00:38:14.380
you've signed your contract with the manuscript.
00:38:15.590 --> 00:38:19.250
Don't argue with your editor, especially not your acquiring editor.
00:38:19.710 --> 00:38:24.630
They chose your book because they liked it and they wanted to publish it.
00:38:24.850 --> 00:38:29.490
So remember that in all your dealings. They saw something in your manuscript
00:38:29.490 --> 00:38:33.230
that they liked and they want to publish.
00:38:33.750 --> 00:38:39.070
So they're not coming at you from a negative place. where they are coming to
00:38:39.070 --> 00:38:43.170
you is from a place of wanting a manuscript
00:38:43.170 --> 00:38:48.430
that is polished and that best represents your publishing house.
00:38:48.750 --> 00:38:52.770
Nobody wants to publish a book that people go, oh my God, the editing in this is horrible.
00:38:53.210 --> 00:38:55.630
Nobody wants to publish that book.
00:38:56.150 --> 00:38:59.110
So remember, they come from that place.
00:38:59.610 --> 00:39:05.910
That said, they are not infallible. You may run into a situation where you've
00:39:05.910 --> 00:39:10.790
been assigned a copy editor who is not doing a particularly good job,
00:39:10.790 --> 00:39:12.790
in your opinion, with your manuscript.
00:39:12.990 --> 00:39:19.170
Some publishing houses have an option for you to contact the publisher directly
00:39:19.170 --> 00:39:22.110
and arbitrate that situation.
00:39:22.890 --> 00:39:26.850
Many do not, so you need to be prepared for that.
00:39:27.815 --> 00:39:32.455
Even if it's the worst experience of your life, you will learn something from
00:39:32.455 --> 00:39:33.895
it. I've not had that situation.
00:39:34.355 --> 00:39:39.715
I have had editors that were easy to work with, that we got along,
00:39:40.095 --> 00:39:43.735
that we understood each other, and I've really been fortunate in that way.
00:39:43.815 --> 00:39:47.155
I know people have had experiences where that's not been the case.
00:39:47.715 --> 00:39:51.115
Remember, you are in control. This is your manuscript.
00:39:51.275 --> 00:39:56.475
Even after you sign a contract, you are allowed to reject certain things,
00:39:56.555 --> 00:40:01.635
but you need to read your contract carefully because in some situations,
00:40:01.715 --> 00:40:05.135
if there is an impasse between you and the copy editor,
00:40:05.375 --> 00:40:09.135
the publishing house manager, the owner, will be the person who decides.
00:40:09.775 --> 00:40:14.495
They most often, unless you can make a very good argument about why something
00:40:14.495 --> 00:40:19.255
should be different, may side with their copy editor because the copy editor is a professional.
00:40:19.655 --> 00:40:23.135
So that's something you need to be aware of. If you sign with a publishing house,
00:40:23.235 --> 00:40:24.615
you lose a lot of control.
00:40:24.815 --> 00:40:28.515
There are many perks, in my opinion, in that I just want to write books.
00:40:28.615 --> 00:40:34.255
I don't want to have to be responsible for all of the other things that go into self-publishing.
00:40:34.495 --> 00:40:40.895
And I've self-published some of my work so I know what that is, what all those jobs are.
00:40:41.215 --> 00:40:45.695
At the end of the day, I just want to write books. I don't want to worry about the other stuff.
00:40:45.895 --> 00:40:49.995
I like working with editors, particularly because because I struggle a lot with
00:40:49.995 --> 00:40:53.715
structure and grammar beyond basic grammar.
00:40:54.035 --> 00:40:56.175
So I appreciate my editor.
00:40:56.515 --> 00:41:00.735
That may not be the case for you. You may love the control and the work that
00:41:00.735 --> 00:41:02.695
goes into being an indie published author.
00:41:03.015 --> 00:41:06.475
And I have a lot of indie published people that I read that I love their books.
00:41:06.615 --> 00:41:09.955
I am always amazed at how well they do all of those jobs.
00:41:10.195 --> 00:41:14.815
For me, it's not a good fit for a number of reasons. Being NeuroSpicy is one of them.
00:41:15.235 --> 00:41:17.955
It's hard for me to focus sometimes and pay attention to detail,
00:41:18.215 --> 00:41:22.115
and all of those things that I appreciate a good copy editor will do.
00:41:22.815 --> 00:41:28.575
So review the changes that your copy editor sends you very, very carefully.
00:41:29.055 --> 00:41:32.315
If you come to an impasse, remember you can appeal to your publisher,
00:41:32.375 --> 00:41:35.935
but in most cases the publisher will go with what the copy editor suggests and
00:41:35.935 --> 00:41:39.675
what their house style is. So that's a big one right there.
00:41:40.115 --> 00:41:45.915
If you're hiring a copy editor on your own, budget accordingly. They are expensive.
00:41:46.955 --> 00:41:48.995
Don't waste their time by sending
00:41:48.995 --> 00:41:53.335
them a manuscript that is full of crap that you could fix yourself.
00:41:53.815 --> 00:41:59.255
If you don't send them misspellings and basic grammar mistakes,
00:41:59.775 --> 00:42:02.455
you're wasting your money, okay?
00:42:02.795 --> 00:42:05.955
Send them as As clean a copy as you can.
00:42:06.135 --> 00:42:12.115
Do the best you can do with what you have and then trust them with the other part of it.
00:42:12.235 --> 00:42:16.155
And remember, like I said, they're expensive. So budget accordingly for that.
00:42:17.093 --> 00:42:20.173
And the biggest thing when working with any of these people,
00:42:20.273 --> 00:42:26.633
beta readers, developmental editors, and copy editors, keep a backup copy of
00:42:26.633 --> 00:42:30.293
your original manuscript someplace safe.
00:42:31.233 --> 00:42:34.693
Your hard drive and the cloud, somewhere in the cloud.
00:42:34.853 --> 00:42:39.533
I have friends that email themselves a copy of their original manuscripts.
00:42:40.033 --> 00:42:44.033
Because your editor may have a computer disaster.
00:42:44.433 --> 00:42:48.813
Anybody can can have a computer disaster. And if the only copy,
00:42:48.873 --> 00:42:51.573
the only original copy existed with them,
00:42:51.853 --> 00:42:57.113
which would be hard to imagine, but I have seen people where their computers
00:42:57.113 --> 00:43:03.393
had a disaster and they've lost all of their original copies of everything.
00:43:03.813 --> 00:43:07.473
And the only people who had original copies were their editors.
00:43:07.853 --> 00:43:11.713
But it's not the original copy anymore because the copy editor is not necessarily
00:43:11.713 --> 00:43:14.933
going to save it in its original form. They're going to save the final all copy.
00:43:15.293 --> 00:43:20.793
So do yourself a favor, save those original copies in someplace safe.
00:43:20.873 --> 00:43:22.753
Make backups as you work.
00:43:22.973 --> 00:43:26.813
I do, I work in Scrivener, which has a daily backup, which means I can always
00:43:26.813 --> 00:43:29.773
revert to the day before if there's some kind of glitch.
00:43:29.893 --> 00:43:33.733
I backup things to the cloud and I also have, of course, my hard drive backup.
00:43:34.133 --> 00:43:38.013
So that's my last and number one thing to tell you.
00:43:38.033 --> 00:43:40.533
If you don't do anything else, you don't take anything else away from today's
00:43:40.533 --> 00:43:43.273
podcast, backup your original manuscript.
00:43:43.533 --> 00:43:47.793
So that's going to be it for me today for best practices for working with beta
00:43:47.793 --> 00:43:49.933
readers, copy editors, and developmental editors.
00:43:50.233 --> 00:43:53.593
You want to build strong relationships with your revision team.
00:43:53.913 --> 00:43:59.893
It goes a long way to helping you create the best manuscript you can and the
00:43:59.893 --> 00:44:03.773
best possible version that you can imagine.
00:44:04.333 --> 00:44:08.913
So remember, each stage of the editing process, serves a unique purpose,
00:44:09.073 --> 00:44:11.433
and embrace that journey of improvement.
00:44:11.533 --> 00:44:16.193
It can be hard. And like I said, rejection sensitivity dysphoria can really
00:44:16.193 --> 00:44:20.373
kick your butt when it comes to this kind of revision.
00:44:21.532 --> 00:44:27.352
Make a plan to address that. Make a plan for dealing with those feelings.
00:44:27.672 --> 00:44:31.032
Whether you're just starting out or you're an experienced writer,
00:44:31.232 --> 00:44:32.752
there's always room for growth.
00:44:33.652 --> 00:44:39.192
Making your next book better than the last one should be on every writer's to-do list.
00:44:39.592 --> 00:44:42.572
If you found these tips helpful, don't forget to subscribe.
00:44:42.832 --> 00:44:46.192
Please leave me a review. It really helps to get the podcast in front of more
00:44:46.192 --> 00:44:52.752
people. So until next time, keep writing, keep revising, and take care of yourself. so.
00:44:53.072 --> 00:44:56.512
Thanks for tuning in to Writing While Distracted, where we navigate the winding
00:44:56.512 --> 00:44:58.932
roads of creativity amidst the chaos of distraction.
00:44:59.512 --> 00:45:02.872
If you've enjoyed this podcast and found it useful, share it and tag me.
00:45:03.332 --> 00:45:06.352
DM me and let me know what you found to be the most helpful.
00:45:06.652 --> 00:45:10.092
Please leave a review. It really helps get the podcast in front of more folks.
00:45:10.432 --> 00:45:14.192
Remember, in the dance between focus and diversion, every stumble is a step
00:45:14.192 --> 00:45:15.832
closer to mastering the art of writing.
00:45:16.092 --> 00:45:18.512
Join me in the next podcast. Join us next time as we continue to unravel the
00:45:18.512 --> 00:45:19.712
mysteries of the writer's mind.
00:45:19.972 --> 00:45:25.352
Until then, keep writing, keep wandering, and embrace the distractions that fuel your creativity.
00:45:25.752 --> 00:45:27.912
Stay tuned. Stay inspired.
00:45:31.280 --> 00:45:42.726
Music.