WEBVTT
00:00.251 --> 00:05.154
[SPEAKER_01]: This episode of Writing Excuses has been brought to you by our listeners, patrons and friends.
00:05.774 --> 00:13.698
[SPEAKER_01]: If you would like to learn how to support this podcast, visit www.patrion.com slash writing excuses.
00:15.219 --> 00:17.480
[SPEAKER_01]: Season 21, episode 38.
00:17.700 --> 00:21.202
[SPEAKER_01]: This is Writing Excuses.
00:31.428 --> 00:33.269
[SPEAKER_02]: I'm Mary, Robinette and Erin.
00:33.589 --> 00:34.089
[SPEAKER_02]: I'm dumb on.
00:34.849 --> 00:37.430
[SPEAKER_02]: I'm confused and also Howard.
00:38.511 --> 00:41.792
[SPEAKER_00]: This cursed episode is for my birthday.
00:42.252 --> 00:43.933
[SPEAKER_00]: Happy birthday to me, everyone.
00:45.193 --> 00:49.115
[SPEAKER_00]: I spend a lot of time usually the opening, saying tools not rules.
00:49.735 --> 00:57.398
[SPEAKER_00]: So for my birthday, I thought I would try to flip it on its head and think about rules that we can use to develop tools.
00:58.499 --> 01:10.709
[SPEAKER_00]: And I was kind of curious about rules from the past, rules, writing rules that existed that people have passed down and whether or not we still find using them and whether or not we're like these ones need to go away.
01:11.690 --> 01:13.972
[SPEAKER_00]: Because history makes rules of us all.
01:14.852 --> 01:17.474
[SPEAKER_00]: And so in order to do this, we're going to take a look back.
01:18.275 --> 01:31.548
[SPEAKER_00]: at the Turkey City, Lexicon, a thing that I think not a lot of people maybe know about, but was passed around a lot as a large piece of writing advice in the early OTS and late 90s.
01:31.568 --> 01:37.654
[SPEAKER_00]: So 20 years ago, a whole generation ago, and it came out of a writer's workshop that, yeah,
01:37.974 --> 01:46.219
[SPEAKER_00]: Think was called Turkey City and people would use all these terms over and over again, and so it is a bunch of rules It is written somewhat snarkly.
01:46.259 --> 02:00.647
[SPEAKER_00]: We will link to it in the description because it's I think of a group who all knew each other And my point in bringing it today is not to necessarily like say how we feel about it But I'm curious like what of the moment in which this thing took place?
02:01.027 --> 02:02.668
[SPEAKER_00]: is actually still helpful today.
02:03.108 --> 02:19.377
[SPEAKER_00]: What are things that we think like the field that the genre that writing has sort of maybe moved on from a little bit, the way that we don't all write in a top-down third person anymore, and then I'm kind of curious what we would do if we had to make our own writing excuses, Alexa Con.
02:19.397 --> 02:20.217
[SPEAKER_02]: Oh boy.
02:21.678 --> 02:36.481
[SPEAKER_02]: After having read Turkey City, Lexicon, I realized that every one of those line items was built on a truth, but the entire document was pro-scription.
02:36.841 --> 02:45.142
[SPEAKER_02]: It was all don't do this, don't do this, don't do this, and I came away feeling like, man, if this was the extent of the
02:51.065 --> 02:56.627
[SPEAKER_03]: I mean, I think the tongue and chickeness of this document saves it in a lot of ways, right?
02:57.007 --> 03:09.052
[SPEAKER_03]: I think everything in here is meant seriously, but is kind of framed in a very snarky confrontational way, which I can see a lot of young writers taking it too literally and too seriously.
03:09.072 --> 03:13.193
[SPEAKER_03]: I'm giving a little bit of generosity to the creators of this.
03:14.694 --> 03:17.695
[SPEAKER_03]: As there is probably a little tongue and chickeness implied here.
03:19.475 --> 03:25.479
[SPEAKER_03]: What I found interesting was each of the items on here, I could find use in and exceptions too.
03:25.959 --> 03:41.549
[SPEAKER_03]: And I think this really goes to the core of our tools, not rules, is all of these are things that I could see applying, and if you're overdoing it, or if you're leaning into it too much, or if you're applying it, and some of them were like, yeah, never do this, I think there was one about,
03:43.390 --> 03:43.991
[SPEAKER_03]: You can't fire me.
03:44.031 --> 03:44.431
[SPEAKER_03]: I quit.
03:44.451 --> 03:45.572
[SPEAKER_03]: Was it was the name of it?
03:45.692 --> 03:58.141
[SPEAKER_03]: And it's like diffusing the readers and crudelity with the preemptive strike is the way they phrase it Which is like a character being like I never would have believed it if I hadn't seen it myself and it's sort of like yeah Don't do that.
03:58.181 --> 04:03.845
[SPEAKER_03]: That's just kind of annoying and it's just kind of you apologizing for your story before writing in And then I say it though.
04:03.885 --> 04:05.166
[SPEAKER_03]: Maybe there are cases that I can work.
04:05.487 --> 04:12.552
[SPEAKER_03]: I think almost in any of these you can make them work But as a rule of thumb, I see the utility in most of these
04:13.420 --> 04:18.745
[SPEAKER_01]: So I was definitely handed the turkey city last time when I started writing.
04:18.765 --> 04:22.008
[SPEAKER_01]: So I started writing seriously in 2005.
04:22.849 --> 04:25.151
[SPEAKER_01]: And this was floating around already at that point.
04:26.333 --> 04:30.336
[SPEAKER_01]: And it was a thing.
04:30.517 --> 04:31.758
[SPEAKER_01]: It was a thing that we were using.
04:31.778 --> 04:33.480
[SPEAKER_01]: And what drove me,
04:35.162 --> 04:52.184
[SPEAKER_01]: What frustrated me was that the way it was being used by early career writers in critique groups is that if they identified something from the Turkey city lexicon, they thought it was a flaw whether or not it worked in this context.
04:53.557 --> 05:08.167
[SPEAKER_01]: So there are situations where people, like, as you know Bob, this is a phrase that exists where it's two characters who are explaining something to each other that they both know.
05:08.867 --> 05:15.828
[SPEAKER_01]: you know, as you know, Bob, we are recording the episode of writing excuses, writing excuses.
05:15.848 --> 05:16.888
[SPEAKER_01]: This is a podcast.
05:18.029 --> 05:21.169
[SPEAKER_01]: So it's like, I don't need to explain any of that to you.
05:21.509 --> 05:26.530
[SPEAKER_01]: But there are situations where it does make sense to have characters do that.
05:26.550 --> 05:29.070
[SPEAKER_01]: It's often like emotionally driven.
05:29.771 --> 05:35.651
[SPEAKER_01]: But you'll see people say, oh, no, you did, you did that or showed on tell you're showing,
05:39.253 --> 05:54.013
[SPEAKER_01]: And I find that the focus on the jargon of it causes us to stop thinking critically about how it actually functions in this particular story.
05:54.972 --> 06:09.438
[SPEAKER_02]: I think the current implementation of this, of the Turkey city thing that's more useful and yet far more in cities and dangerous is TV tropes.
06:10.579 --> 06:21.204
[SPEAKER_02]: Because you've got bazillion names for bazillion things you might do, the thing that I like about TV tropes is that they're not saying that these things are bad.
06:21.744 --> 06:27.127
[SPEAKER_02]: They're saying that these things are things, and they happen often enough that we've given them names.
06:27.727 --> 06:36.711
[SPEAKER_02]: And it's helpful to know the name for it, so that you know when you're doing it, so you don't necessarily do it the same way it's been done a thousand times before.
06:37.488 --> 06:38.949
[SPEAKER_00]: Well, I think that's true, but not true.
06:39.049 --> 06:45.094
[SPEAKER_00]: Because I think people will often call other people's works tropey, like they're like, oh, this feels predictable.
06:45.134 --> 06:45.995
[SPEAKER_00]: I think what they're saying.
06:46.515 --> 06:51.879
[SPEAKER_00]: I knew where it was going already because it followed this set pattern that TV tropes has told me exists.
06:52.780 --> 07:05.528
[SPEAKER_00]: Which is interesting because they literally document anything that could exist from the thing that only happens in three random anime to like, you know, using capital letters at the beginning of sentences is probably a trope in there.
07:06.028 --> 07:16.475
[SPEAKER_00]: And so it's like, it has a wide range and so I think it is, it is a lot about how we do sometimes grasp for rules like we want to know if what we're doing is right or wrong.
07:22.318 --> 07:22.698
[SPEAKER_00]: Why?
07:23.159 --> 07:40.451
[SPEAKER_00]: Sometimes we'll look for, okay, like if I can pinpoint, oh, you're doing X, then I can say number one that like I am right about my feelings in the story and like that it gives me some backup other people have also this is obviously a problem in a specific way even if that doesn't turn out to be the issue at all.
07:42.665 --> 07:59.315
[SPEAKER_03]: It's easy to look at this document and be like, oh, what a crazy thing that happened in 1986, but one thing I want to emphasize is that we see these patterns reemerging over again people love to come up with writing advice and I want to be careful and say this in a way that isn't like kids these days kind of vibe, but
07:59.895 --> 08:10.464
[SPEAKER_03]: There's a lot of writing advice and I see kicking around on the book talk that people like to cherry pick and respond to because sometimes to me it will sound completely crazy, right?
08:10.564 --> 08:15.188
[SPEAKER_03]: There's a lot of talk out there about whether or not you should write in first person, because
08:16.009 --> 08:18.070
[SPEAKER_03]: The reader is not actually doing these things.
08:18.090 --> 08:19.831
[SPEAKER_03]: So how could you ever write in first person?
08:19.851 --> 08:21.732
[SPEAKER_03]: How could that throws them out of the experience?
08:22.512 --> 08:24.773
[SPEAKER_03]: I've also seen the advice of never write in third person.
08:24.813 --> 08:29.435
[SPEAKER_03]: And it just like gets, there's a lot of conflict happening right now around these conversations.
08:29.475 --> 08:39.659
[SPEAKER_03]: And I see them flare up consistently on threads and on TikTok that are around a specific desire to conform to certain types of reading that a certain audience wants.
08:39.819 --> 08:42.020
[SPEAKER_03]: And then that gets generalized out, right?
08:42.380 --> 08:42.981
[SPEAKER_03]: And I see this.
08:43.681 --> 09:03.321
[SPEAKER_03]: this truck you see to lexicon as having emerged from one of those moments and this is a pattern that repeats itself over and over and over again throughout history as people are looking for what's the easy solve I mean it you know what's the advice that somebody can give me that'll fix my writing and let me write a bestseller and access whatever promise land there is.
09:03.830 --> 09:07.373
[SPEAKER_01]: So I have also run into this as well.
09:07.993 --> 09:14.918
[SPEAKER_01]: And there was also a period when people were saying, oh, if you're writing first person, then it must be in past tense.
09:15.478 --> 09:20.742
[SPEAKER_01]: And it refuses the entire thing because we know that they survived.
09:20.802 --> 09:21.643
[SPEAKER_01]: And it's like, oh my god.
09:22.463 --> 09:25.926
[SPEAKER_01]: Um, if you're writing in present tense, are they sitting there and scribbling it?
09:25.966 --> 09:37.417
[SPEAKER_01]: It's like, no, it's okay, but for me, one of the things about a document like this, I tend to think about criticism as coming in three layers.
09:37.997 --> 09:42.361
[SPEAKER_01]: There's symptoms, there's diagnosis and there's prescription.
09:43.602 --> 09:58.792
[SPEAKER_01]: Often, when you have something like a Turkish city lexicon or a new thing that is being developed, what happens is it's like people who've injured themselves and then Google for medical terms to describe what they're happening.
09:59.792 --> 10:09.178
[SPEAKER_01]: And it is often coming from a place where they are not actually subject matter experts, but having terms makes it feel like they are.
10:09.719 --> 10:10.279
[SPEAKER_01]: And so they
10:12.480 --> 10:16.403
[SPEAKER_01]: see things that just aren't acknowledging what the actual reader experiences.
10:16.744 --> 10:34.138
[SPEAKER_01]: Like the, you know, one of the problems with the white room syndrome, which is listed here as a clear and common sign of the failure of the author's imagination, most often seen in the beginning of a story, she awoke in a white room.
10:34.698 --> 10:37.839
[SPEAKER_01]: the right room is a featureless set for details which have yet to be invented.
10:38.039 --> 10:43.160
[SPEAKER_01]: Okay, so this is a thing that does happen that sometimes you don't give the reader grounding details.
10:43.721 --> 10:51.983
[SPEAKER_01]: But there's this story in Asimovs where the character literally wakes up in a white room and they've got amnesia and I'm like, oh my goodness.
10:52.523 --> 10:55.585
[SPEAKER_01]: I have read about this problem and it is a it is a thing.
10:56.066 --> 11:06.794
[SPEAKER_01]: This this author and how did it get an azimovs and as the story unfolds it becomes extremely clear that why this was so important because it was a clone that was waking up.
11:07.634 --> 11:12.778
[SPEAKER_01]: And the reason they didn't have memories before that moment was because they were a clone waking up.
11:13.198 --> 11:17.321
[SPEAKER_01]: And it's like, this was being used to too such good effect.
11:18.101 --> 11:31.331
[SPEAKER_01]: And was completely appropriate, but I as a young writer would have tossed that story if it had come to me in a slush pile because I had read the turkey city, Lexicon, and it learned that the white room syndrome was a flaw.
11:32.290 --> 11:47.025
[SPEAKER_03]: it's the John Wick thing right you can never kill a dog in a movie so John Wick said we're going to do it in the opening right and build an entire movie around it but you can do these things if you hang a lantern on it right it was so clear in that movie that they knew exactly what they were doing
11:47.325 --> 11:51.968
[SPEAKER_03]: and that they were breaking a rule and by breaking the rule they were like we're doing something fresh and new.
11:52.328 --> 11:54.209
[SPEAKER_03]: You've never seen an action movie like this.
11:54.249 --> 11:55.690
[SPEAKER_03]: You've never seen a story like this.
11:56.050 --> 11:58.391
[SPEAKER_03]: We're going to show you something new and they did a lot.
11:58.872 --> 12:01.173
[SPEAKER_03]: There's a lot of like edgy elements to that movie.
12:01.213 --> 12:04.595
[SPEAKER_03]: There's like the way they do like typography on the screen and things like that.
12:04.655 --> 12:09.478
[SPEAKER_03]: Some of it works, some of it doesn't, but what's very clear is they're signaling to the audience.
12:09.498 --> 12:12.339
[SPEAKER_03]: They're signaling to the producers who backed them movie.
12:12.740 --> 12:13.760
[SPEAKER_03]: We're doing something different.
12:13.820 --> 12:16.602
[SPEAKER_03]: We're fresh and new and you can use some of these techniques
12:17.122 --> 12:20.285
[SPEAKER_03]: in a very deliberate way to push that forward.
12:21.366 --> 12:24.950
[SPEAKER_00]: Well, this is so helpful, but not chaotic enough for my birthday.
12:25.351 --> 12:29.935
[SPEAKER_00]: So when we get back from the break, I'm going to push us to go even further.
12:29.955 --> 12:31.557
[SPEAKER_00]: Boom, boom, boom, boom.
12:35.048 --> 12:38.231
[SPEAKER_00]: Okay, we're back, and I'm older, um, and in this.
12:38.251 --> 12:39.432
[SPEAKER_00]: And what's the question?
12:39.472 --> 12:40.113
[SPEAKER_03]: Where are we going?
12:40.193 --> 12:49.382
[SPEAKER_00]: Yes, so what I want to have at is, I want to talk a little bit more about what you would do if you were forced to write one of these.
12:50.063 --> 12:51.204
[SPEAKER_00]: for writing excuses.
12:51.745 --> 12:54.547
[SPEAKER_00]: And you can't say, oh no, like sometimes it will work.
12:54.627 --> 13:11.122
[SPEAKER_00]: No, I want like what is your intrusive turkey city style rule that is something that's like a pet peeve of yours, something that never works, something that you would put in yourself for better or worse, if you had to snorkely inform people of things that they had to do, what is your rule not a tool?
13:11.462 --> 13:14.024
[SPEAKER_03]: I didn't realize this episode was get canceled with Aaron Roberts.
13:18.393 --> 13:19.874
[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, see, that's the thing.
13:19.934 --> 13:31.039
[SPEAKER_02]: I've reached a point in my life where even just speculating about what sort of bad advice would I give?
13:32.599 --> 13:34.060
[SPEAKER_02]: No, but this has to be good advice.
13:34.080 --> 13:34.861
[SPEAKER_02]: Good advice.
13:34.901 --> 13:37.342
[SPEAKER_03]: What advice you give that you believe you're right about?
13:38.122 --> 13:42.044
[SPEAKER_03]: That is universally or very close universally applicable.
13:42.704 --> 13:45.345
[SPEAKER_01]: punctuation captures breath.
13:45.465 --> 13:46.706
[SPEAKER_01]: It is not about grammar.
13:48.450 --> 13:48.630
[SPEAKER_03]: 100%.
13:48.650 --> 13:48.750
[SPEAKER_03]: Woo!
13:48.770 --> 13:50.872
[SPEAKER_03]: 100% not that bad.
13:50.892 --> 13:51.593
[SPEAKER_01]: Same more.
13:52.534 --> 13:57.558
[SPEAKER_01]: So, I... like, where you place commas.
13:57.879 --> 14:00.581
[SPEAKER_01]: Commas, those are about where you're gonna breathe, and where you're gonna pause.
14:00.621 --> 14:01.502
[SPEAKER_01]: It's capturing thoughts.
14:02.043 --> 14:05.666
[SPEAKER_01]: I had to narrate a book that I affectionately call the god damn Ukrainian novel.
14:07.267 --> 14:11.848
[SPEAKER_01]: And this author decided that what they were going to do.
14:11.888 --> 14:14.229
[SPEAKER_01]: So first of all, it is a book in translation.
14:14.249 --> 14:15.889
[SPEAKER_01]: So we're going to grant them that.
14:16.949 --> 14:24.431
[SPEAKER_01]: But there was a chapter with no paragraph breaks at all.
14:25.271 --> 14:29.052
[SPEAKER_01]: And also, sentences that were three quarters of a page long.
14:29.952 --> 14:32.813
[SPEAKER_01]: So this author had made very clear choices.
14:37.274 --> 14:39.156
[SPEAKER_01]: Not only was there visually nothing on the page.
14:39.176 --> 14:41.417
[SPEAKER_01]: There was no breathing room in the text.
14:42.398 --> 14:45.821
[SPEAKER_01]: And it wasn't, it was, she had done it because it was edgy.
14:45.901 --> 14:48.723
[SPEAKER_01]: Each chapter was trying a different edgy thing.
14:50.464 --> 15:02.873
[SPEAKER_01]: And so it frustrates me when I see people get uptight about how they should use punctuation without thinking about, and they're thinking about chromatic rules without thinking about,
15:05.495 --> 15:13.905
[SPEAKER_01]: a rose in order to capture this thing that we do naturally, which is pausing when we talk and breathing, and that's why we have in-dashes.
15:14.206 --> 15:15.667
[SPEAKER_01]: That's why we have ellipses.
15:15.707 --> 15:18.831
[SPEAKER_01]: That's why commas are there to indicate these pauses.
15:18.871 --> 15:19.792
[SPEAKER_01]: So that would be mine.
15:21.414 --> 15:22.015
[SPEAKER_00]: Beautiful.
15:22.936 --> 15:23.537
[SPEAKER_00]: Other victims.
15:23.577 --> 15:24.818
[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, other volunteers?
15:25.965 --> 15:33.317
[SPEAKER_03]: I'm like circling the shape of one that I can't, I don't have a pitty way to put it yet because this was sprung on us and an act of cruelty.
15:33.337 --> 15:34.399
[SPEAKER_03]: Yes.
15:35.841 --> 15:38.766
[SPEAKER_03]: But for me, I think my core one is
15:40.533 --> 15:43.194
[SPEAKER_03]: readers care about relationships.
15:44.034 --> 15:53.356
[SPEAKER_03]: You have to have a character in relationship to another character and I'm going to put a caveat here that can be in relationship to themselves.
15:53.636 --> 15:56.216
[SPEAKER_03]: That can be a division within themselves that they're trying to resolve.
15:56.837 --> 16:03.298
[SPEAKER_03]: And the emotional interiority of a relationship is literally the only thing readers care about.
16:03.838 --> 16:11.763
[SPEAKER_03]: Everything else that's happening around that is applying external threat to melodramatically demonstrate the nature of a relationship under threat.
16:12.063 --> 16:19.968
[SPEAKER_03]: So if you have an action novel, somebody is trying to save somebody else, kill somebody else, whatever it is, it is about how they feel about another person.
16:20.389 --> 16:30.375
[SPEAKER_03]: A revenge story works not because of you want to see that person get killed somebody, but because of the sense of betrayal at the core of the revenge story.
16:30.495 --> 16:34.836
[SPEAKER_03]: somebody cared about somebody that was violated and now we're invested.
16:35.296 --> 16:38.957
[SPEAKER_03]: You can't have a revenge story if you don't show me who the person loved to begin with.
16:39.918 --> 16:41.078
[SPEAKER_03]: There will come soft rains.
16:42.398 --> 16:43.218
[SPEAKER_03]: Where's the character?
16:43.779 --> 16:44.579
[SPEAKER_03]: The character's the house.
16:44.859 --> 16:51.741
[SPEAKER_03]: The house is in relationship to an often off-screen person that it cared about.
16:52.281 --> 16:57.062
[SPEAKER_03]: The house is the reason we feel tenderness towards the house is because it is
17:00.003 --> 17:04.007
[SPEAKER_03]: It is activating our desire to anthropomorphize action.
17:04.548 --> 17:10.354
[SPEAKER_03]: And in the house's actions, we are reading care for the humans that were no longer there.
17:10.654 --> 17:15.039
[SPEAKER_03]: The heartbreak of the story is that we are projecting emotions onto a thing that is gone.
17:15.679 --> 17:15.779
[SPEAKER_03]: And
17:16.920 --> 17:45.725
[SPEAKER_03]: And the thing that doesn't exist anymore is the fact that that is an automated house that has no emotions but we are feeling the relationship that it represents because it's doing the things that humans should do to care for each other so that love and the care in the connection between the family that lived in that house and the dog that comes in and dies in the house because it is so irradiated in poison all of those are the heartbreaking things the heartbreaking thing is the love of domesticity that is represented by the house.
17:46.693 --> 18:11.326
[SPEAKER_02]: I don't know that I could argue with, you know, four or against, uh, Don Juan's original point, but the, uh, facility with which you responded to Mary Rubinett's question leads me to believe that at least in your own mind, you are 100% right, and I'm willing to be convinced.
18:12.140 --> 18:14.642
[SPEAKER_02]: Like I'm willing to fight anyone on it.
18:14.702 --> 18:26.649
[SPEAKER_03]: I guess what the hell you'll die on the sort of and like I will die on this And I'm willing to give you that hill that's yeah, yeah, like I fundamentally believe that readers need a reason to care
18:27.709 --> 18:35.215
[SPEAKER_01]: I have read stories where there is not an individual character in the way that we think about.
18:36.476 --> 18:40.078
[SPEAKER_01]: I do think that relationships are often the driver there.
18:40.539 --> 18:41.859
[SPEAKER_01]: There's a great story called
18:47.223 --> 19:10.504
[SPEAKER_01]: David Cheryl, I think, we will correct that in the line or notes if I'm wrong listeners, in which it is entirely omniscient broad upper view of a traffic jam in LA and the way it fundamentally changes the city because it is a traffic jam that can't be undone.
19:11.585 --> 19:20.490
[SPEAKER_01]: And there are no individual characters, but it's incredibly compelling, but it is because I think of this big overview of all of these relationships.
19:20.810 --> 19:22.311
[SPEAKER_03]: Yeah, you can attenuate it, right?
19:22.331 --> 19:26.713
[SPEAKER_03]: You can take that concept and attenuate it and extract it to a certain amount.
19:26.893 --> 19:36.758
[SPEAKER_03]: But when that abstraction breaks down, it usually could be saved by having more clarity about what is the emotional core, what are the people who care about other people.
19:37.158 --> 19:41.723
[SPEAKER_03]: even if it is our idea of L.A. as a city or our imagination of the people in the cars.
19:41.743 --> 19:42.784
[SPEAKER_02]: All right.
19:42.844 --> 19:50.412
[SPEAKER_02]: I think I've got my I think I've got my writing advice rule now and I'm going to put a I'm going to pretty put a pretty big stake in the ground.
19:51.653 --> 19:57.520
[SPEAKER_02]: Your first book right the book that you want to read.
19:58.435 --> 20:01.598
[SPEAKER_02]: Forget the rest of the audiences, forget the market, forget everything else.
20:01.918 --> 20:05.781
[SPEAKER_02]: Your first book, you write the book that you want to read.
20:05.821 --> 20:07.903
[SPEAKER_02]: If you don't do that, you're breaking the rule in your bed.
20:09.344 --> 20:16.070
[SPEAKER_02]: You're fifth book, and I'm not picking five, just because that's how many fingers I have on this hand if you count the thumb.
20:16.451 --> 20:23.657
[SPEAKER_02]: I'm picking five because physics, your fifth book writes something that isn't for you.
20:25.954 --> 20:32.208
[SPEAKER_02]: because that's the point in your career where you are ready to reach beyond.
20:33.294 --> 20:35.515
[SPEAKER_01]: Now, I think the books should always be for you.
20:36.015 --> 20:36.635
[SPEAKER_03]: I think so too.
20:37.196 --> 20:45.219
[SPEAKER_02]: I think that you can, right, books that are- Oh, I'm not saying the fifth one's gonna sell, but I'm saying that's the point of which.
20:45.379 --> 20:48.260
[SPEAKER_03]: I do agree that you should push yourself the deeper you get to create.
20:48.340 --> 20:51.381
[SPEAKER_03]: And you should ask yourself what is it that I really want to be reading?
20:51.781 --> 20:54.522
[SPEAKER_03]: And you should be expanding your horizons as much as possible.
20:54.542 --> 21:01.385
[SPEAKER_03]: So I agree with you, I think, in the subtext of what you're saying, but I also think you should always write for yourself first.
21:01.505 --> 21:01.725
[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah.
21:02.545 --> 21:03.865
[SPEAKER_01]: Yes, I would agree with that, Erin.
21:04.205 --> 21:04.946
[SPEAKER_01]: What is yours?
21:05.866 --> 21:06.566
[SPEAKER_01]: First day girl.
21:06.866 --> 21:07.186
[SPEAKER_00]: Yes.
21:07.906 --> 21:09.047
[SPEAKER_00]: You have to write it.
21:09.427 --> 21:11.607
[SPEAKER_00]: And by that I mean, AI bad.
21:11.787 --> 21:14.648
[SPEAKER_03]: Yes.
21:14.668 --> 21:16.128
[SPEAKER_03]: That was a cheap cop.
21:16.528 --> 21:18.209
[SPEAKER_03]: You're all agree with that.
21:18.529 --> 21:19.869
[SPEAKER_03]: That's not a country.
21:19.949 --> 21:21.269
[SPEAKER_00]: I didn't have to be controversial.
21:21.469 --> 21:24.490
[SPEAKER_00]: I just said I had to do something that you 100% believe.
21:24.690 --> 21:27.591
[SPEAKER_00]: Plus, I'm sure there's like three people right now canceling me in their head.
21:32.372 --> 21:33.153
[SPEAKER_03]: I'm going to go over it.
21:33.433 --> 21:38.478
[SPEAKER_03]: If you're canceling me because you think that AI should write books, then hate me.
21:38.558 --> 21:39.258
[SPEAKER_03]: I'm good with that.
21:39.879 --> 21:41.881
[SPEAKER_03]: Have fun selling your shoulder the robot.
21:43.242 --> 21:53.212
[SPEAKER_00]: But that is the thing that I really, because I think like ultimately what is all of these pieces of advice ultimately are about writing and ultimately if you want to write, you got to write.
21:54.352 --> 21:58.955
[SPEAKER_00]: And you don't, you know, that is the thing you have to do the writing at some point.
21:58.995 --> 22:02.737
[SPEAKER_00]: You can have friends, you can outsource parts of it, you can have a whole cheering section.
22:02.777 --> 22:06.079
[SPEAKER_00]: But really what we want is we want your words.
22:06.119 --> 22:08.280
[SPEAKER_00]: We want the ideas that you have.
22:08.600 --> 22:12.822
[SPEAKER_00]: And that is the birthday present that I want is your words and what you have.
22:13.242 --> 22:23.268
[SPEAKER_00]: And so, I'm going to end us a little early with homework for you, listener, which is to make yourself a little time capsule of who you are right now as a writer.
22:23.628 --> 22:43.002
[SPEAKER_00]: right so you're gonna pick one a thing a piece of advice something that's really kind of working for you right now something you do not agree with like something maybe we said that somebody else has said that you're like leave that in the past and then what is the writing hill you will die on what is the thing that you believe it doesn't matter if it's right it doesn't matter if it's true
22:43.642 --> 22:49.405
[SPEAKER_00]: I don't know, put those in a little envelope digitally or otherwise, and then it'll give you a sense of who you are right now.
22:49.745 --> 22:59.471
[SPEAKER_00]: But also, I want you to challenge yourself to open it at a date later that feels significant to you and see how many of those three things still are true for you.
22:59.791 --> 23:00.051
[SPEAKER_00]: That.
23:00.071 --> 23:01.472
[SPEAKER_00]: So that's it.
23:02.373 --> 23:03.914
[SPEAKER_01]: This has been Writing Excuses.
23:04.314 --> 23:05.254
[SPEAKER_01]: You're out of excuses.
23:05.655 --> 23:06.275
[SPEAKER_01]: Now go right.
23:08.960 --> 23:12.622
[SPEAKER_01]: Writing excuses has been brought to you by our listeners, patrons and friends.
23:13.182 --> 23:18.924
[SPEAKER_01]: For this episode, your hosts were Mary Robinette Koal, Dong Wan Song, Erin Roberts and Howard Taylor.
23:19.465 --> 23:25.467
[SPEAKER_01]: This episode was engineered by Marshall Card Jr., mastered by Alex Jackson, and produced by Emma Reynolds.
23:26.088 --> 23:28.269
[SPEAKER_01]: For more information, visit writing excuses.com.
00:00.251 --> 00:05.154
[SPEAKER_01]: This episode of Writing Excuses has been brought to you by our listeners, patrons and friends.
00:05.774 --> 00:13.698
[SPEAKER_01]: If you would like to learn how to support this podcast, visit www.patrion.com slash writing excuses.
00:15.219 --> 00:17.480
[SPEAKER_01]: Season 21, episode 38.
00:17.700 --> 00:21.202
[SPEAKER_01]: This is Writing Excuses.
00:31.428 --> 00:33.269
[SPEAKER_02]: I'm Mary, Robinette and Erin.
00:33.589 --> 00:34.089
[SPEAKER_02]: I'm dumb on.
00:34.849 --> 00:37.430
[SPEAKER_02]: I'm confused and also Howard.
00:38.511 --> 00:41.792
[SPEAKER_00]: This cursed episode is for my birthday.
00:42.252 --> 00:43.933
[SPEAKER_00]: Happy birthday to me, everyone.
00:45.193 --> 00:49.115
[SPEAKER_00]: I spend a lot of time usually the opening, saying tools not rules.
00:49.735 --> 00:57.398
[SPEAKER_00]: So for my birthday, I thought I would try to flip it on its head and think about rules that we can use to develop tools.
00:58.499 --> 01:10.709
[SPEAKER_00]: And I was kind of curious about rules from the past, rules, writing rules that existed that people have passed down and whether or not we still find using them and whether or not we're like these ones need to go away.
01:11.690 --> 01:13.972
[SPEAKER_00]: Because history makes rules of us all.
01:14.852 --> 01:17.474
[SPEAKER_00]: And so in order to do this, we're going to take a look back.
01:18.275 --> 01:31.548
[SPEAKER_00]: at the Turkey City, Lexicon, a thing that I think not a lot of people maybe know about, but was passed around a lot as a large piece of writing advice in the early OTS and late 90s.
01:31.568 --> 01:37.654
[SPEAKER_00]: So 20 years ago, a whole generation ago, and it came out of a writer's workshop that, yeah,
01:37.974 --> 01:46.219
[SPEAKER_00]: Think was called Turkey City and people would use all these terms over and over again, and so it is a bunch of rules It is written somewhat snarkly.
01:46.259 --> 02:00.647
[SPEAKER_00]: We will link to it in the description because it's I think of a group who all knew each other And my point in bringing it today is not to necessarily like say how we feel about it But I'm curious like what of the moment in which this thing took place?
02:01.027 --> 02:02.668
[SPEAKER_00]: is actually still helpful today.
02:03.108 --> 02:19.377
[SPEAKER_00]: What are things that we think like the field that the genre that writing has sort of maybe moved on from a little bit, the way that we don't all write in a top-down third person anymore, and then I'm kind of curious what we would do if we had to make our own writing excuses, Alexa Con.
02:19.397 --> 02:20.217
[SPEAKER_02]: Oh boy.
02:21.678 --> 02:36.481
[SPEAKER_02]: After having read Turkey City, Lexicon, I realized that every one of those line items was built on a truth, but the entire document was pro-scription.
02:36.841 --> 02:45.142
[SPEAKER_02]: It was all don't do this, don't do this, don't do this, and I came away feeling like, man, if this was the extent of the
02:51.065 --> 02:56.627
[SPEAKER_03]: I mean, I think the tongue and chickeness of this document saves it in a lot of ways, right?
02:57.007 --> 03:09.052
[SPEAKER_03]: I think everything in here is meant seriously, but is kind of framed in a very snarky confrontational way, which I can see a lot of young writers taking it too literally and too seriously.
03:09.072 --> 03:13.193
[SPEAKER_03]: I'm giving a little bit of generosity to the creators of this.
03:14.694 --> 03:17.695
[SPEAKER_03]: As there is probably a little tongue and chickeness implied here.
03:19.475 --> 03:25.479
[SPEAKER_03]: What I found interesting was each of the items on here, I could find use in and exceptions too.
03:25.959 --> 03:41.549
[SPEAKER_03]: And I think this really goes to the core of our tools, not rules, is all of these are things that I could see applying, and if you're overdoing it, or if you're leaning into it too much, or if you're applying it, and some of them were like, yeah, never do this, I think there was one about,
03:43.390 --> 03:43.991
[SPEAKER_03]: You can't fire me.
03:44.031 --> 03:44.431
[SPEAKER_03]: I quit.
03:44.451 --> 03:45.572
[SPEAKER_03]: Was it was the name of it?
03:45.692 --> 03:58.141
[SPEAKER_03]: And it's like diffusing the readers and crudelity with the preemptive strike is the way they phrase it Which is like a character being like I never would have believed it if I hadn't seen it myself and it's sort of like yeah Don't do that.
03:58.181 --> 04:03.845
[SPEAKER_03]: That's just kind of annoying and it's just kind of you apologizing for your story before writing in And then I say it though.
04:03.885 --> 04:05.166
[SPEAKER_03]: Maybe there are cases that I can work.
04:05.487 --> 04:12.552
[SPEAKER_03]: I think almost in any of these you can make them work But as a rule of thumb, I see the utility in most of these
04:13.420 --> 04:18.745
[SPEAKER_01]: So I was definitely handed the turkey city last time when I started writing.
04:18.765 --> 04:22.008
[SPEAKER_01]: So I started writing seriously in 2005.
04:22.849 --> 04:25.151
[SPEAKER_01]: And this was floating around already at that point.
04:26.333 --> 04:30.336
[SPEAKER_01]: And it was a thing.
04:30.517 --> 04:31.758
[SPEAKER_01]: It was a thing that we were using.
04:31.778 --> 04:33.480
[SPEAKER_01]: And what drove me,
04:35.162 --> 04:52.184
[SPEAKER_01]: What frustrated me was that the way it was being used by early career writers in critique groups is that if they identified something from the Turkey city lexicon, they thought it was a flaw whether or not it worked in this context.
04:53.557 --> 05:08.167
[SPEAKER_01]: So there are situations where people, like, as you know Bob, this is a phrase that exists where it's two characters who are explaining something to each other that they both know.
05:08.867 --> 05:15.828
[SPEAKER_01]: you know, as you know, Bob, we are recording the episode of writing excuses, writing excuses.
05:15.848 --> 05:16.888
[SPEAKER_01]: This is a podcast.
05:18.029 --> 05:21.169
[SPEAKER_01]: So it's like, I don't need to explain any of that to you.
05:21.509 --> 05:26.530
[SPEAKER_01]: But there are situations where it does make sense to have characters do that.
05:26.550 --> 05:29.070
[SPEAKER_01]: It's often like emotionally driven.
05:29.771 --> 05:35.651
[SPEAKER_01]: But you'll see people say, oh, no, you did, you did that or showed on tell you're showing,
05:39.253 --> 05:54.013
[SPEAKER_01]: And I find that the focus on the jargon of it causes us to stop thinking critically about how it actually functions in this particular story.
05:54.972 --> 06:09.438
[SPEAKER_02]: I think the current implementation of this, of the Turkey city thing that's more useful and yet far more in cities and dangerous is TV tropes.
06:10.579 --> 06:21.204
[SPEAKER_02]: Because you've got bazillion names for bazillion things you might do, the thing that I like about TV tropes is that they're not saying that these things are bad.
06:21.744 --> 06:27.127
[SPEAKER_02]: They're saying that these things are things, and they happen often enough that we've given them names.
06:27.727 --> 06:36.711
[SPEAKER_02]: And it's helpful to know the name for it, so that you know when you're doing it, so you don't necessarily do it the same way it's been done a thousand times before.
06:37.488 --> 06:38.949
[SPEAKER_00]: Well, I think that's true, but not true.
06:39.049 --> 06:45.094
[SPEAKER_00]: Because I think people will often call other people's works tropey, like they're like, oh, this feels predictable.
06:45.134 --> 06:45.995
[SPEAKER_00]: I think what they're saying.
06:46.515 --> 06:51.879
[SPEAKER_00]: I knew where it was going already because it followed this set pattern that TV tropes has told me exists.
06:52.780 --> 07:05.528
[SPEAKER_00]: Which is interesting because they literally document anything that could exist from the thing that only happens in three random anime to like, you know, using capital letters at the beginning of sentences is probably a trope in there.
07:06.028 --> 07:16.475
[SPEAKER_00]: And so it's like, it has a wide range and so I think it is, it is a lot about how we do sometimes grasp for rules like we want to know if what we're doing is right or wrong.
07:22.318 --> 07:22.698
[SPEAKER_00]: Why?
07:23.159 --> 07:40.451
[SPEAKER_00]: Sometimes we'll look for, okay, like if I can pinpoint, oh, you're doing X, then I can say number one that like I am right about my feelings in the story and like that it gives me some backup other people have also this is obviously a problem in a specific way even if that doesn't turn out to be the issue at all.
07:42.665 --> 07:59.315
[SPEAKER_03]: It's easy to look at this document and be like, oh, what a crazy thing that happened in 1986, but one thing I want to emphasize is that we see these patterns reemerging over again people love to come up with writing advice and I want to be careful and say this in a way that isn't like kids these days kind of vibe, but
07:59.895 --> 08:10.464
[SPEAKER_03]: There's a lot of writing advice and I see kicking around on the book talk that people like to cherry pick and respond to because sometimes to me it will sound completely crazy, right?
08:10.564 --> 08:15.188
[SPEAKER_03]: There's a lot of talk out there about whether or not you should write in first person, because
08:16.009 --> 08:18.070
[SPEAKER_03]: The reader is not actually doing these things.
08:18.090 --> 08:19.831
[SPEAKER_03]: So how could you ever write in first person?
08:19.851 --> 08:21.732
[SPEAKER_03]: How could that throws them out of the experience?
08:22.512 --> 08:24.773
[SPEAKER_03]: I've also seen the advice of never write in third person.
08:24.813 --> 08:29.435
[SPEAKER_03]: And it just like gets, there's a lot of conflict happening right now around these conversations.
08:29.475 --> 08:39.659
[SPEAKER_03]: And I see them flare up consistently on threads and on TikTok that are around a specific desire to conform to certain types of reading that a certain audience wants.
08:39.819 --> 08:42.020
[SPEAKER_03]: And then that gets generalized out, right?
08:42.380 --> 08:42.981
[SPEAKER_03]: And I see this.
08:43.681 --> 09:03.321
[SPEAKER_03]: this truck you see to lexicon as having emerged from one of those moments and this is a pattern that repeats itself over and over and over again throughout history as people are looking for what's the easy solve I mean it you know what's the advice that somebody can give me that'll fix my writing and let me write a bestseller and access whatever promise land there is.
09:03.830 --> 09:07.373
[SPEAKER_01]: So I have also run into this as well.
09:07.993 --> 09:14.918
[SPEAKER_01]: And there was also a period when people were saying, oh, if you're writing first person, then it must be in past tense.
09:15.478 --> 09:20.742
[SPEAKER_01]: And it refuses the entire thing because we know that they survived.
09:20.802 --> 09:21.643
[SPEAKER_01]: And it's like, oh my god.
09:22.463 --> 09:25.926
[SPEAKER_01]: Um, if you're writing in present tense, are they sitting there and scribbling it?
09:25.966 --> 09:37.417
[SPEAKER_01]: It's like, no, it's okay, but for me, one of the things about a document like this, I tend to think about criticism as coming in three layers.
09:37.997 --> 09:42.361
[SPEAKER_01]: There's symptoms, there's diagnosis and there's prescription.
09:43.602 --> 09:58.792
[SPEAKER_01]: Often, when you have something like a Turkish city lexicon or a new thing that is being developed, what happens is it's like people who've injured themselves and then Google for medical terms to describe what they're happening.
09:59.792 --> 10:09.178
[SPEAKER_01]: And it is often coming from a place where they are not actually subject matter experts, but having terms makes it feel like they are.
10:09.719 --> 10:10.279
[SPEAKER_01]: And so they
10:12.480 --> 10:16.403
[SPEAKER_01]: see things that just aren't acknowledging what the actual reader experiences.
10:16.744 --> 10:34.138
[SPEAKER_01]: Like the, you know, one of the problems with the white room syndrome, which is listed here as a clear and common sign of the failure of the author's imagination, most often seen in the beginning of a story, she awoke in a white room.
10:34.698 --> 10:37.839
[SPEAKER_01]: the right room is a featureless set for details which have yet to be invented.
10:38.039 --> 10:43.160
[SPEAKER_01]: Okay, so this is a thing that does happen that sometimes you don't give the reader grounding details.
10:43.721 --> 10:51.983
[SPEAKER_01]: But there's this story in Asimovs where the character literally wakes up in a white room and they've got amnesia and I'm like, oh my goodness.
10:52.523 --> 10:55.585
[SPEAKER_01]: I have read about this problem and it is a it is a thing.
10:56.066 --> 11:06.794
[SPEAKER_01]: This this author and how did it get an azimovs and as the story unfolds it becomes extremely clear that why this was so important because it was a clone that was waking up.
11:07.634 --> 11:12.778
[SPEAKER_01]: And the reason they didn't have memories before that moment was because they were a clone waking up.
11:13.198 --> 11:17.321
[SPEAKER_01]: And it's like, this was being used to too such good effect.
11:18.101 --> 11:31.331
[SPEAKER_01]: And was completely appropriate, but I as a young writer would have tossed that story if it had come to me in a slush pile because I had read the turkey city, Lexicon, and it learned that the white room syndrome was a flaw.
11:32.290 --> 11:47.025
[SPEAKER_03]: it's the John Wick thing right you can never kill a dog in a movie so John Wick said we're going to do it in the opening right and build an entire movie around it but you can do these things if you hang a lantern on it right it was so clear in that movie that they knew exactly what they were doing
11:47.325 --> 11:51.968
[SPEAKER_03]: and that they were breaking a rule and by breaking the rule they were like we're doing something fresh and new.
11:52.328 --> 11:54.209
[SPEAKER_03]: You've never seen an action movie like this.
11:54.249 --> 11:55.690
[SPEAKER_03]: You've never seen a story like this.
11:56.050 --> 11:58.391
[SPEAKER_03]: We're going to show you something new and they did a lot.
11:58.872 --> 12:01.173
[SPEAKER_03]: There's a lot of like edgy elements to that movie.
12:01.213 --> 12:04.595
[SPEAKER_03]: There's like the way they do like typography on the screen and things like that.
12:04.655 --> 12:09.478
[SPEAKER_03]: Some of it works, some of it doesn't, but what's very clear is they're signaling to the audience.
12:09.498 --> 12:12.339
[SPEAKER_03]: They're signaling to the producers who backed them movie.
12:12.740 --> 12:13.760
[SPEAKER_03]: We're doing something different.
12:13.820 --> 12:16.602
[SPEAKER_03]: We're fresh and new and you can use some of these techniques
12:17.122 --> 12:20.285
[SPEAKER_03]: in a very deliberate way to push that forward.
12:21.366 --> 12:24.950
[SPEAKER_00]: Well, this is so helpful, but not chaotic enough for my birthday.
12:25.351 --> 12:29.935
[SPEAKER_00]: So when we get back from the break, I'm going to push us to go even further.
12:29.955 --> 12:31.557
[SPEAKER_00]: Boom, boom, boom, boom.
12:35.048 --> 12:38.231
[SPEAKER_00]: Okay, we're back, and I'm older, um, and in this.
12:38.251 --> 12:39.432
[SPEAKER_00]: And what's the question?
12:39.472 --> 12:40.113
[SPEAKER_03]: Where are we going?
12:40.193 --> 12:49.382
[SPEAKER_00]: Yes, so what I want to have at is, I want to talk a little bit more about what you would do if you were forced to write one of these.
12:50.063 --> 12:51.204
[SPEAKER_00]: for writing excuses.
12:51.745 --> 12:54.547
[SPEAKER_00]: And you can't say, oh no, like sometimes it will work.
12:54.627 --> 13:11.122
[SPEAKER_00]: No, I want like what is your intrusive turkey city style rule that is something that's like a pet peeve of yours, something that never works, something that you would put in yourself for better or worse, if you had to snorkely inform people of things that they had to do, what is your rule not a tool?
13:11.462 --> 13:14.024
[SPEAKER_03]: I didn't realize this episode was get canceled with Aaron Roberts.
13:18.393 --> 13:19.874
[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, see, that's the thing.
13:19.934 --> 13:31.039
[SPEAKER_02]: I've reached a point in my life where even just speculating about what sort of bad advice would I give?
13:32.599 --> 13:34.060
[SPEAKER_02]: No, but this has to be good advice.
13:34.080 --> 13:34.861
[SPEAKER_02]: Good advice.
13:34.901 --> 13:37.342
[SPEAKER_03]: What advice you give that you believe you're right about?
13:38.122 --> 13:42.044
[SPEAKER_03]: That is universally or very close universally applicable.
13:42.704 --> 13:45.345
[SPEAKER_01]: punctuation captures breath.
13:45.465 --> 13:46.706
[SPEAKER_01]: It is not about grammar.
13:48.450 --> 13:48.630
[SPEAKER_03]: 100%.
13:48.650 --> 13:48.750
[SPEAKER_03]: Woo!
13:48.770 --> 13:50.872
[SPEAKER_03]: 100% not that bad.
13:50.892 --> 13:51.593
[SPEAKER_01]: Same more.
13:52.534 --> 13:57.558
[SPEAKER_01]: So, I... like, where you place commas.
13:57.879 --> 14:00.581
[SPEAKER_01]: Commas, those are about where you're gonna breathe, and where you're gonna pause.
14:00.621 --> 14:01.502
[SPEAKER_01]: It's capturing thoughts.
14:02.043 --> 14:05.666
[SPEAKER_01]: I had to narrate a book that I affectionately call the god damn Ukrainian novel.
14:07.267 --> 14:11.848
[SPEAKER_01]: And this author decided that what they were going to do.
14:11.888 --> 14:14.229
[SPEAKER_01]: So first of all, it is a book in translation.
14:14.249 --> 14:15.889
[SPEAKER_01]: So we're going to grant them that.
14:16.949 --> 14:24.431
[SPEAKER_01]: But there was a chapter with no paragraph breaks at all.
14:25.271 --> 14:29.052
[SPEAKER_01]: And also, sentences that were three quarters of a page long.
14:29.952 --> 14:32.813
[SPEAKER_01]: So this author had made very clear choices.
14:37.274 --> 14:39.156
[SPEAKER_01]: Not only was there visually nothing on the page.
14:39.176 --> 14:41.417
[SPEAKER_01]: There was no breathing room in the text.
14:42.398 --> 14:45.821
[SPEAKER_01]: And it wasn't, it was, she had done it because it was edgy.
14:45.901 --> 14:48.723
[SPEAKER_01]: Each chapter was trying a different edgy thing.
14:50.464 --> 15:02.873
[SPEAKER_01]: And so it frustrates me when I see people get uptight about how they should use punctuation without thinking about, and they're thinking about chromatic rules without thinking about,
15:05.495 --> 15:13.905
[SPEAKER_01]: a rose in order to capture this thing that we do naturally, which is pausing when we talk and breathing, and that's why we have in-dashes.
15:14.206 --> 15:15.667
[SPEAKER_01]: That's why we have ellipses.
15:15.707 --> 15:18.831
[SPEAKER_01]: That's why commas are there to indicate these pauses.
15:18.871 --> 15:19.792
[SPEAKER_01]: So that would be mine.
15:21.414 --> 15:22.015
[SPEAKER_00]: Beautiful.
15:22.936 --> 15:23.537
[SPEAKER_00]: Other victims.
15:23.577 --> 15:24.818
[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, other volunteers?
15:25.965 --> 15:33.317
[SPEAKER_03]: I'm like circling the shape of one that I can't, I don't have a pitty way to put it yet because this was sprung on us and an act of cruelty.
15:33.337 --> 15:34.399
[SPEAKER_03]: Yes.
15:35.841 --> 15:38.766
[SPEAKER_03]: But for me, I think my core one is
15:40.533 --> 15:43.194
[SPEAKER_03]: readers care about relationships.
15:44.034 --> 15:53.356
[SPEAKER_03]: You have to have a character in relationship to another character and I'm going to put a caveat here that can be in relationship to themselves.
15:53.636 --> 15:56.216
[SPEAKER_03]: That can be a division within themselves that they're trying to resolve.
15:56.837 --> 16:03.298
[SPEAKER_03]: And the emotional interiority of a relationship is literally the only thing readers care about.
16:03.838 --> 16:11.763
[SPEAKER_03]: Everything else that's happening around that is applying external threat to melodramatically demonstrate the nature of a relationship under threat.
16:12.063 --> 16:19.968
[SPEAKER_03]: So if you have an action novel, somebody is trying to save somebody else, kill somebody else, whatever it is, it is about how they feel about another person.
16:20.389 --> 16:30.375
[SPEAKER_03]: A revenge story works not because of you want to see that person get killed somebody, but because of the sense of betrayal at the core of the revenge story.
16:30.495 --> 16:34.836
[SPEAKER_03]: somebody cared about somebody that was violated and now we're invested.
16:35.296 --> 16:38.957
[SPEAKER_03]: You can't have a revenge story if you don't show me who the person loved to begin with.
16:39.918 --> 16:41.078
[SPEAKER_03]: There will come soft rains.
16:42.398 --> 16:43.218
[SPEAKER_03]: Where's the character?
16:43.779 --> 16:44.579
[SPEAKER_03]: The character's the house.
16:44.859 --> 16:51.741
[SPEAKER_03]: The house is in relationship to an often off-screen person that it cared about.
16:52.281 --> 16:57.062
[SPEAKER_03]: The house is the reason we feel tenderness towards the house is because it is
17:00.003 --> 17:04.007
[SPEAKER_03]: It is activating our desire to anthropomorphize action.
17:04.548 --> 17:10.354
[SPEAKER_03]: And in the house's actions, we are reading care for the humans that were no longer there.
17:10.654 --> 17:15.039
[SPEAKER_03]: The heartbreak of the story is that we are projecting emotions onto a thing that is gone.
17:15.679 --> 17:15.779
[SPEAKER_03]: And
17:16.920 --> 17:45.725
[SPEAKER_03]: And the thing that doesn't exist anymore is the fact that that is an automated house that has no emotions but we are feeling the relationship that it represents because it's doing the things that humans should do to care for each other so that love and the care in the connection between the family that lived in that house and the dog that comes in and dies in the house because it is so irradiated in poison all of those are the heartbreaking things the heartbreaking thing is the love of domesticity that is represented by the house.
17:46.693 --> 18:11.326
[SPEAKER_02]: I don't know that I could argue with, you know, four or against, uh, Don Juan's original point, but the, uh, facility with which you responded to Mary Rubinett's question leads me to believe that at least in your own mind, you are 100% right, and I'm willing to be convinced.
18:12.140 --> 18:14.642
[SPEAKER_02]: Like I'm willing to fight anyone on it.
18:14.702 --> 18:26.649
[SPEAKER_03]: I guess what the hell you'll die on the sort of and like I will die on this And I'm willing to give you that hill that's yeah, yeah, like I fundamentally believe that readers need a reason to care
18:27.709 --> 18:35.215
[SPEAKER_01]: I have read stories where there is not an individual character in the way that we think about.
18:36.476 --> 18:40.078
[SPEAKER_01]: I do think that relationships are often the driver there.
18:40.539 --> 18:41.859
[SPEAKER_01]: There's a great story called
18:47.223 --> 19:10.504
[SPEAKER_01]: David Cheryl, I think, we will correct that in the line or notes if I'm wrong listeners, in which it is entirely omniscient broad upper view of a traffic jam in LA and the way it fundamentally changes the city because it is a traffic jam that can't be undone.
19:11.585 --> 19:20.490
[SPEAKER_01]: And there are no individual characters, but it's incredibly compelling, but it is because I think of this big overview of all of these relationships.
19:20.810 --> 19:22.311
[SPEAKER_03]: Yeah, you can attenuate it, right?
19:22.331 --> 19:26.713
[SPEAKER_03]: You can take that concept and attenuate it and extract it to a certain amount.
19:26.893 --> 19:36.758
[SPEAKER_03]: But when that abstraction breaks down, it usually could be saved by having more clarity about what is the emotional core, what are the people who care about other people.
19:37.158 --> 19:41.723
[SPEAKER_03]: even if it is our idea of L.A. as a city or our imagination of the people in the cars.
19:41.743 --> 19:42.784
[SPEAKER_02]: All right.
19:42.844 --> 19:50.412
[SPEAKER_02]: I think I've got my I think I've got my writing advice rule now and I'm going to put a I'm going to pretty put a pretty big stake in the ground.
19:51.653 --> 19:57.520
[SPEAKER_02]: Your first book right the book that you want to read.
19:58.435 --> 20:01.598
[SPEAKER_02]: Forget the rest of the audiences, forget the market, forget everything else.
20:01.918 --> 20:05.781
[SPEAKER_02]: Your first book, you write the book that you want to read.
20:05.821 --> 20:07.903
[SPEAKER_02]: If you don't do that, you're breaking the rule in your bed.
20:09.344 --> 20:16.070
[SPEAKER_02]: You're fifth book, and I'm not picking five, just because that's how many fingers I have on this hand if you count the thumb.
20:16.451 --> 20:23.657
[SPEAKER_02]: I'm picking five because physics, your fifth book writes something that isn't for you.
20:25.954 --> 20:32.208
[SPEAKER_02]: because that's the point in your career where you are ready to reach beyond.
20:33.294 --> 20:35.515
[SPEAKER_01]: Now, I think the books should always be for you.
20:36.015 --> 20:36.635
[SPEAKER_03]: I think so too.
20:37.196 --> 20:45.219
[SPEAKER_02]: I think that you can, right, books that are- Oh, I'm not saying the fifth one's gonna sell, but I'm saying that's the point of which.
20:45.379 --> 20:48.260
[SPEAKER_03]: I do agree that you should push yourself the deeper you get to create.
20:48.340 --> 20:51.381
[SPEAKER_03]: And you should ask yourself what is it that I really want to be reading?
20:51.781 --> 20:54.522
[SPEAKER_03]: And you should be expanding your horizons as much as possible.
20:54.542 --> 21:01.385
[SPEAKER_03]: So I agree with you, I think, in the subtext of what you're saying, but I also think you should always write for yourself first.
21:01.505 --> 21:01.725
[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah.
21:02.545 --> 21:03.865
[SPEAKER_01]: Yes, I would agree with that, Erin.
21:04.205 --> 21:04.946
[SPEAKER_01]: What is yours?
21:05.866 --> 21:06.566
[SPEAKER_01]: First day girl.
21:06.866 --> 21:07.186
[SPEAKER_00]: Yes.
21:07.906 --> 21:09.047
[SPEAKER_00]: You have to write it.
21:09.427 --> 21:11.607
[SPEAKER_00]: And by that I mean, AI bad.
21:11.787 --> 21:14.648
[SPEAKER_03]: Yes.
21:14.668 --> 21:16.128
[SPEAKER_03]: That was a cheap cop.
21:16.528 --> 21:18.209
[SPEAKER_03]: You're all agree with that.
21:18.529 --> 21:19.869
[SPEAKER_03]: That's not a country.
21:19.949 --> 21:21.269
[SPEAKER_00]: I didn't have to be controversial.
21:21.469 --> 21:24.490
[SPEAKER_00]: I just said I had to do something that you 100% believe.
21:24.690 --> 21:27.591
[SPEAKER_00]: Plus, I'm sure there's like three people right now canceling me in their head.
21:32.372 --> 21:33.153
[SPEAKER_03]: I'm going to go over it.
21:33.433 --> 21:38.478
[SPEAKER_03]: If you're canceling me because you think that AI should write books, then hate me.
21:38.558 --> 21:39.258
[SPEAKER_03]: I'm good with that.
21:39.879 --> 21:41.881
[SPEAKER_03]: Have fun selling your shoulder the robot.
21:43.242 --> 21:53.212
[SPEAKER_00]: But that is the thing that I really, because I think like ultimately what is all of these pieces of advice ultimately are about writing and ultimately if you want to write, you got to write.
21:54.352 --> 21:58.955
[SPEAKER_00]: And you don't, you know, that is the thing you have to do the writing at some point.
21:58.995 --> 22:02.737
[SPEAKER_00]: You can have friends, you can outsource parts of it, you can have a whole cheering section.
22:02.777 --> 22:06.079
[SPEAKER_00]: But really what we want is we want your words.
22:06.119 --> 22:08.280
[SPEAKER_00]: We want the ideas that you have.
22:08.600 --> 22:12.822
[SPEAKER_00]: And that is the birthday present that I want is your words and what you have.
22:13.242 --> 22:23.268
[SPEAKER_00]: And so, I'm going to end us a little early with homework for you, listener, which is to make yourself a little time capsule of who you are right now as a writer.
22:23.628 --> 22:43.002
[SPEAKER_00]: right so you're gonna pick one a thing a piece of advice something that's really kind of working for you right now something you do not agree with like something maybe we said that somebody else has said that you're like leave that in the past and then what is the writing hill you will die on what is the thing that you believe it doesn't matter if it's right it doesn't matter if it's true
22:43.642 --> 22:49.405
[SPEAKER_00]: I don't know, put those in a little envelope digitally or otherwise, and then it'll give you a sense of who you are right now.
22:49.745 --> 22:59.471
[SPEAKER_00]: But also, I want you to challenge yourself to open it at a date later that feels significant to you and see how many of those three things still are true for you.
22:59.791 --> 23:00.051
[SPEAKER_00]: That.
23:00.071 --> 23:01.472
[SPEAKER_00]: So that's it.
23:02.373 --> 23:03.914
[SPEAKER_01]: This has been Writing Excuses.
23:04.314 --> 23:05.254
[SPEAKER_01]: You're out of excuses.
23:05.655 --> 23:06.275
[SPEAKER_01]: Now go right.
23:08.960 --> 23:12.622
[SPEAKER_01]: Writing excuses has been brought to you by our listeners, patrons and friends.
23:13.182 --> 23:18.924
[SPEAKER_01]: For this episode, your hosts were Mary Robinette Koal, Dong Wan Song, Erin Roberts and Howard Taylor.
23:19.465 --> 23:25.467
[SPEAKER_01]: This episode was engineered by Marshall Card Jr., mastered by Alex Jackson, and produced by Emma Reynolds.
23:26.088 --> 23:28.269
[SPEAKER_01]: For more information, visit writing excuses.com.
