درباره این اپیزود
This episode looks at common misinformation campaigns used to oppose pro-wildlife efforts, including messaging that discourages public involvement and leans heavily on “trust the experts.” Sam and Mark break down how these narratives are constructed and why they are effective. They also examine the role of science versus values in wildlife decisions and what that means for public participation.
Dr. Becky Niemiec's analysis of Prop 127
انگلیسی
ایالات متحده آمریکا
رونوشت 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
جستجوی اپیزودهای گذشته
اپیزودهای قبلی Wildlife Wire را جستجو کن.
قسمت های دیگر در این پادکست
This episode breaks down how wildlife legislation actually moves through the political process. Bills begin with a core concept, but are quickly reshaped by stakeholder input, requiring tradeoffs between policy goals and what is operationally and politically feasible.
Wildlife policy outcomes dep…
Mark and Sam get real on how wildlife "management" decisions are made, discuss science-based management and what it means for Colorado residents and wildlife.
On today's episode Samantha and Mark discuss the interesting wildlife news, including:
8 Everyday Habits You Can Change That Actually Make a Difference for Wildlife
Marshland mashup: Red wolf-coyote hybrids adapt to coastal Louisiana • Louisiana Illuminator
Raccoons are evolving to be as cute …
Join Sam and Mark as they wrap up their first full year hosting the Wildlife Wire! Thank you to all who have listened throughout the year. We look forward to sharing our thoughts and guests with you.
On this episode we have:
Rogan blasts liberal policies for enabling mountain lions to eat pets…
سلب مسئولیت: پادکست و آثار هنری تعبیه شده در این صفحه متعلق به The Wildlife Wire است که متعلق به صاحب آن است و به Listen Notes، Inc وابسته یا تایید نشده است.
ویرایش
از کمک شما برای بروز نگهداشتن پایگاهدادههای پادکست سپاسگزاریم
