26. COMPARATIVE LEARNING THROUGH COMMUNITY EXCHANGE: A conversation with Jack Makau and Temilade Sesan

WEBVTT
00:00:10.880 --> 00:00:20.239
Hello, and on this month's Urban Radar special feature, we ask, how can community-led data collection and analysis help to shift the levers of urban power?
00:00:20.480 --> 00:00:25.600
What role can action research play in changing the attitudes of governments towards the urban poor?
00:00:25.839 --> 00:00:31.359
And how can we move from individual to collective solutions through community action and transnational learning?
00:00:31.600 --> 00:00:35.119
Welcome to Urban Radar, the podcast that takes an urban lens on current affairs.
00:00:35.200 --> 00:00:40.399
I'm Tom Goodfellow, Professor of Urban Development at the Global Development Institute, University of Manchester.
00:00:40.560 --> 00:00:45.840
And I'm Beth Perry, Director of the Urban Institute and Professor of Urban Epistemics at the University of Sheffield.
00:00:46.000 --> 00:00:49.359
So, Tom, you've had a really exciting week last week, haven't you?
00:00:49.520 --> 00:00:55.119
Because you uh were in Kampala um as part of the African Cities Research Consortium uh visit.
00:00:55.200 --> 00:00:55.359
Yeah.
00:00:55.759 --> 00:00:57.119
Yeah, yeah, we were in Kampala.
00:00:57.280 --> 00:00:59.520
It was very intense, um, very interesting.
00:00:59.679 --> 00:01:01.679
It was uh for me, it was a return to an old haunt.
00:01:01.759 --> 00:01:06.719
It's where I started my academic career, did a lot of my PhD research in Kampala, so it feels a bit like a second home.
00:01:06.799 --> 00:01:07.760
It was great to be back.
00:01:07.920 --> 00:01:16.400
But of course, we were mostly in conference rooms having a lot of detailed discussions about this research program that I'm going to be uh leading from the summer onwards.
00:01:16.719 --> 00:01:17.200
Very exciting.
00:01:17.439 --> 00:01:18.560
Do you want to tell us a bit about it?
00:01:18.640 --> 00:01:21.680
Because it's going to form the backbone of our feature.
00:01:22.159 --> 00:01:22.799
Yes, absolutely.
00:01:22.959 --> 00:01:25.200
So some listeners might know this, others might not.
00:01:25.280 --> 00:01:43.840
But of course, we're talking here about the African Cities Research Consortium, which is a large program funded by the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Development Office to explore basically urban challenges in cities across Africa and particular issues identified by communities that they can then try to address through their own solutions.
00:01:43.920 --> 00:01:52.239
And so the research network is set up to support basically community-led solutions in cities, particularly in informal settlements within cities.
00:01:52.400 --> 00:01:58.000
And we work primarily in five countries across Africa, which we'll say a bit more about in the discussion.
00:01:58.480 --> 00:02:05.439
I have to ask though, how did it feel going back, knowing that you're going to be like leading this consortium on African cities research?
00:02:05.599 --> 00:02:07.840
But then also you were there as a PhD student.
00:02:08.240 --> 00:02:11.360
Yeah, I mean that was quite strange in some ways.
00:02:11.520 --> 00:02:15.360
I mean, the thing is with ACRC, it's very much collectively led.
00:02:15.439 --> 00:02:20.400
There's a large senior management team all with distinct roles, and it's a program I've been involved in in the past.
00:02:20.560 --> 00:02:25.759
So this has been a gradual process of becoming involved with this program, taking on different roles within this program.
00:02:26.159 --> 00:02:31.840
But it it is quite a striking contrast to being this lone researcher as a PhD student, traveling about.
00:02:32.080 --> 00:02:52.319
I mean, the main difference I notice is that in those days I would always get on the motorcycle taxis, regardless of the safety concerns at any time of day, uh, and be very much kind of zooming about on my own, setting up meetings, you know, traveling throughout the city as this individual, um, and learning more and more about the local communities and the politics there.
00:02:52.479 --> 00:03:03.599
Whereas now I'm embedded within this real structure of organizations and agencies and people who are deeply steeped in the local politics and the local organizational sort of networks.
00:03:03.759 --> 00:03:06.240
Um, and we're moving around together and talking together.
00:03:06.319 --> 00:03:07.919
So the whole thing is obviously much more collective.
00:03:08.240 --> 00:03:23.919
Yeah, and I think we'll come to that in the discussion as well that you have um with your colleagues, because um, of course, that movement from an individual loan researcher towards a centre that's trying to really build capacity and act as a facilitator to use Jack's words, um, is really important, isn't it?
00:03:24.319 --> 00:03:25.120
Yes, absolutely.
00:03:25.599 --> 00:03:27.840
Do you want to say anything about our guests?
00:03:28.319 --> 00:03:29.520
Yeah, so I'll say a little bit.
00:03:29.599 --> 00:03:36.240
So I'll I'll say briefly, if and apologies to people who know this, but just to make clear what this discussion is about and the and what it's predicated to.
00:03:36.479 --> 00:03:37.280
And of course, I wasn't there.
00:03:37.520 --> 00:03:39.120
And you weren't there, Beth, which was a great shame.
00:03:39.199 --> 00:03:41.360
I'm hoping we hope to get you there next time somehow.
00:03:41.599 --> 00:03:50.879
Um But we were we are now in a phase of the African Cities Research Consortium's work, which is known as the implementation phase, following an earlier foundation phase.
00:03:51.039 --> 00:03:55.599
In that earlier phase, there was a lot of research to understand the nature of urban challenges in different domains.
00:03:55.759 --> 00:04:02.719
So we did research on housing, on land, on basic infrastructure, on youth capabilities, on safety and security, for example.
00:04:02.879 --> 00:04:05.199
And those were kind of background scoping reports.
00:04:05.439 --> 00:04:08.800
Where we are now is implementing action research projects.
00:04:09.039 --> 00:04:11.039
And for those It's the most exciting bit, isn't it?
00:04:11.280 --> 00:04:20.560
In many ways, it's the most, yeah, the most exciting bit, and and that's what has brought a lot of people to this project in this phase is the excitement about having action and research together.
00:04:20.720 --> 00:04:23.519
And a lot of new people have joined in this phase.
00:04:23.759 --> 00:04:32.959
And without going into detail, and you've obviously worked extensively in action research, but for any listeners who don't know, what we mean by action research in this context is essentially two things.
00:04:33.120 --> 00:04:41.920
One is that researchers are working very closely with communities to co-produce potential ideas for solutions in the communities where they work.
00:04:42.160 --> 00:04:52.800
So the interventions that we're seeking to make in cities to address problems are developed collaboratively with groups in informal settlements.
00:04:52.959 --> 00:05:04.720
So there are these co-produced potential solutions to problems implemented sometimes by an NGO or a private company or even by researchers, and we do research on how that goes.
00:05:04.879 --> 00:05:11.920
So it might be that the community decides we need a new drain, we need some streetlighting, we need they're often these quite basic things.
00:05:12.079 --> 00:05:17.279
Or we need a new approach to how we catalogue our own land ownership structures.
00:05:17.439 --> 00:05:21.759
And they implement that solution, and then we have research going on around that.
00:05:22.079 --> 00:05:25.759
So we have action research projects in five cities across Africa.
00:05:26.000 --> 00:05:29.199
In total, there's over 20 action research projects happening.
00:05:29.360 --> 00:05:40.160
And in each city, there is a person with the name of city manager who oversees those action research projects and tries to draw together the learning as well as just making sure everything progresses.
00:05:40.480 --> 00:05:49.040
So in this discussion, we have two of the city managers: the city manager for Lagos, who's Temilar Deshachan, and the city manager for Nairobi, Jack Macau.
00:05:49.439 --> 00:05:51.680
And those are the people I was talking to for this discussion.
00:05:52.079 --> 00:06:01.279
And what's so important also, I think, about this is that you were there on the ground as part of this workshop, but also uh Jack and Temi are our first guests from Africa.
00:06:01.439 --> 00:06:05.199
So that feels really important, and I'd like to see that happening more through an urban reading.
00:06:05.600 --> 00:06:16.480
I guess with the exception of Tanya Zak from South Africa, they're our first African uh guests, and the first time we've had a kind of conversational discussion in on site in another country, actually.
00:06:16.639 --> 00:06:18.079
I think it's the first time we've done that.
00:06:18.480 --> 00:06:18.959
Yeah, I think so.
00:06:19.199 --> 00:06:20.399
We've we've had people zooming in.
00:06:20.480 --> 00:06:24.800
But we were there on the I tend to only go to Arbathorn, as anybody who listens to the podcast knows.
00:06:26.240 --> 00:06:30.720
So when we had this conversation, we were sitting in a hotel room where we just had this big workshop event.
00:06:30.879 --> 00:06:38.720
Um it was the end of the day on the first day, uh, and we were very removed from the action of the city, right on the edges of Lake Victoria in a big conference hotel that was convenient.
00:06:38.879 --> 00:06:44.160
But we the following day we got out into the city, into the action, and this conversation took place just before that.
00:06:44.240 --> 00:06:45.759
And for me, it was a great scene center.
00:06:46.160 --> 00:06:47.199
And that's so important, isn't it?
00:06:47.360 --> 00:06:56.319
Because I mean, this is an exemplification of the methodology of exchanges and why they matter so much to enable people to learn from each other within a city, but also across cities.
00:06:56.399 --> 00:07:00.480
And I mean, as you say, that resonates a lot with some of the themes that have come out of my work over time.
00:07:00.879 --> 00:07:04.480
Yes, and with our discussion with Diana Mitlin and Melanie Lombard on exchanges.
00:07:04.560 --> 00:07:18.399
But what we did here is we really, and the bit that I think is most interesting when we get into it is the specifics of this exchange between Lagos and Nairobi and what each site learned about their own city, about the politics of change and making change happen in their own city through that exchange process.
00:07:18.720 --> 00:07:19.040
Absolutely.
00:07:19.199 --> 00:07:20.319
Let's have a listen.
00:07:30.160 --> 00:07:39.519
Okay, so I'm very pleased to be joined in a discussion, a conversation today with two of the city managers from the African Cities Research Consortium.
00:07:39.759 --> 00:07:53.920
We're here in Kampala, um, where we're having a workshop all week of city managers from across the five cities that the consortium works in, those five cities being Kampala, Nairobi, Lagos, Harari, and Accra.
00:07:54.240 --> 00:08:04.240
And I'm joined today by the city managers for Lagos, uh, the city manager for Lagos, Temelade Shichon, and the city manager for Nairobi, Jack Macau.
00:08:04.720 --> 00:08:21.600
Um, perhaps we could begin with you just introducing yourselves, um, how you became involved in ACRC and uh saying a little bit about the projects happening, the action research projects which are happening in your cities through the African Cities Research Consortium.
00:08:21.759 --> 00:08:25.120
So I'll begin with you, Jack, because I think you were involved at an earlier stage.
00:08:25.600 --> 00:08:26.480
Thank you, Tom.
00:08:26.879 --> 00:08:29.519
And it's it's great to join you.
00:08:29.680 --> 00:08:31.920
Uh as I said, I'm I'm from Nairobi.
00:08:32.720 --> 00:08:43.600
I got involved with ACSC at the conceptual stage, and then I carried on and have come in into the implementation stage.
00:08:43.919 --> 00:08:51.120
So in Nairobi, uh we currently have a portfolio of six projects.
00:08:52.159 --> 00:08:55.519
Uh and what we did, they're very diverse.
00:08:56.080 --> 00:09:03.360
What we did is that we looked for projects that um provided an opportunity for change.
00:09:04.320 --> 00:09:20.480
Uh we had uh a school feeding program just because Nairobi has been having a discussion about whether school feeding should be provided only in public schools or it should be universal.
00:09:20.799 --> 00:09:32.799
So we have another project uh that is looking at understanding the complexity of land ownership in informal settlements, and we have realized that it's very layered.
00:09:33.679 --> 00:09:42.799
Uh so this project is looking both at official data and informal arrangements, and there are plenty of informal arrangements.
00:09:43.039 --> 00:09:58.399
And then there's uh the age-old question, which is a third project of how do you provide sewa and water in informal settlements, uh, given the densities, given the lack of planning, and so on.
00:09:58.720 --> 00:10:23.679
Uh, then we have a fourth project um that is looking at waste management, sanitation, and then uh we have a fifth project uh that aligns with Nairobi's uh uh attempt to regenerate its rivers and trying to say how does this look in informal settlements.
00:10:23.759 --> 00:10:26.240
It's very different from the rest of the city.
00:10:26.480 --> 00:10:39.360
There are people occupying those lands, uh, they have different needs, so it's trying to plan out and propose uh how a river looks when it passes through an informal settlement.
00:10:39.840 --> 00:10:53.759
And lastly, uh the Nairobi County becomes the first city government in Africa to have a mandate for displaced populations, refugees, economic migrants, and so on.
00:10:54.000 --> 00:11:00.320
And we are trying to research and action how integration happens.
00:11:00.639 --> 00:11:04.480
We think it's a lesson for Africa, but beyond Africa.
00:11:04.639 --> 00:11:08.639
I think uh migration is a big global challenge.
00:11:09.440 --> 00:11:10.240
Thank you so much, Jack.
00:11:10.399 --> 00:11:14.720
That really gives a sense, I think, of the breadth and diversity of the projects in ACRC.
00:11:14.799 --> 00:11:20.559
Obviously, Nairobi was one of the first cities to get moving, so you have quite an advanced portfolio of projects.
00:11:20.720 --> 00:11:25.200
Let's turn now to you, Temi, to tell us a bit about your background and the projects in Lagos.
00:11:25.519 --> 00:11:28.879
Yes, thank you very much, and thanks for having me on this conversation.
00:11:29.120 --> 00:11:44.960
Um, so in Lagos, we're working um with colleagues at the Center for Housing and Sustainable Development at the University of Lagos, but um also with um communities to advance ACRC um goals.
00:11:45.200 --> 00:11:55.120
So we've been working, uh, we'd been like a loose network almost of um urban researchers, urban practitioners, urban sort of reformists, even though we didn't necessarily use that term.
00:11:55.200 --> 00:12:03.279
Um but ACRC was a chance to sort of um coalesze around um the issues that we'd always been um working on separately.
00:12:03.440 --> 00:12:14.159
Um and so at the moment we have three projects, three AR projects running, um, inspired by the Litania of projects uh in Nairobi.
00:12:14.879 --> 00:12:27.039
Um we have one on wash, that's water and sanitation, um, in an informal settlement um in the heart of the city.
00:12:27.440 --> 00:12:40.159
And what we're looking to do there is um combined like toilet and um borehole facilities, but beyond the infrastructure, it's the governance and the management of that.
00:12:40.320 --> 00:12:47.519
Um, in a context where there is very little um public water or sewerage connections.
00:12:47.679 --> 00:12:53.200
Um so we're trying to do that at the community level and trying to get the local government to come alongside that.
00:12:53.519 --> 00:13:12.720
Um the second project is um a climate resilience project um in another community in the city where um flooding happens um regularly and quite predictably due to a confluence of just several systemic but also local factors.
00:13:12.879 --> 00:13:22.240
Um and so we're working, first of all, to understand the drivers behind the flooding, but also community perceptions of the risk and the management of that risk.
00:13:22.399 --> 00:13:38.639
Um and so that has just concluded its um sort of feasibility sort of exploratory phase, and we're hoping to move to an implementation of the um sort of community um derived solutions that you know that that project uncovered.
00:13:38.799 --> 00:13:51.919
And then thirdly, uh most recently we have this add-on to the um Climate Resilience Project, which is a waste management project in the same community where we have the Climate Resilience Project.
00:13:52.000 --> 00:14:06.240
And these are linked, you know, the more that we can manage um drainage in the community, the more that um um flooding is um is mitigated because we have waste management practices that affect drainage systems.
00:14:06.320 --> 00:14:11.600
So I think it all links into this idea of interconnected systems within communities and at the city level.
00:14:12.000 --> 00:14:13.519
So, yeah, that's what we're doing.
00:14:13.840 --> 00:14:14.240
Excellent.
00:14:14.320 --> 00:14:17.279
So hopefully we can we can explore some of those interconnections.
00:14:17.360 --> 00:14:26.960
And I think, I mean, what's clear, you know, we have this range of projects from things like land, uh, rivers, refugee integration to sewerage, climate resilience.
00:14:27.120 --> 00:14:37.840
But what unifies these in a way is an approach that's part of the ACRC approach, and much of that is about um action research and bringing together evidence and action in a particular way.
00:14:38.000 --> 00:14:52.399
And we've really heard in our workshop already today how one unifying factor of the whole network in ACRC is this belief that we need to think about action and research, evidence together to really produce sustainable change.
00:14:52.639 --> 00:14:58.399
And and this is something that the that SDI, Slum Chapdwellers International, has been doing for a very long time.
00:14:58.559 --> 00:15:00.639
Uh, and ACRC builds on that work.
00:15:00.799 --> 00:15:06.799
But I wonder if you could tell us a bit more about this approach to that relationship between evidence and action.
00:15:07.120 --> 00:15:17.600
So I think Beth Chutequebiti, the community knowledge lead for ACRC, was talking about the idea of actionable knowledge, and that's in a sense what we seek to generate here.
00:15:17.919 --> 00:15:19.600
So, can you tell us a bit more?
00:15:19.679 --> 00:15:32.480
And perhaps again starting with you, Jack, given your history with SDI, about what are the kinds of evidence, the kinds of data that you think are most important to really generate change in your cities and to make change happen?
00:15:32.720 --> 00:15:41.519
And why is it that community um community actors themselves are so central in generating that data, which is key to your approach?
00:15:42.159 --> 00:15:42.879
Thank you, Tom.
00:15:43.440 --> 00:15:49.679
So so for many, many years, uh communities have been drawn into data collection.
00:15:50.879 --> 00:16:00.080
We we have done it and it has become a conventional way in which research is done, not only with ACRC or SDI, just generally.
00:16:00.799 --> 00:16:21.279
Now the departure, and we think this is the big difference, is that we are now involving communities not only in the collection, but in the analysis of the data, and then in the production of messages coming out of that data.
00:16:21.600 --> 00:16:25.360
And and the results are fascinating.
00:16:25.919 --> 00:16:38.000
Uh they actually have greater insight into their circumstances and actually add on to the analysis and the crafting of their priorities.
00:16:38.159 --> 00:16:42.159
And we think that's that's the that's the silver bullet.
00:16:42.240 --> 00:16:51.519
That's that's the magic that happens when you get communities involved in the entire uh data process, not only in collection.
00:16:52.159 --> 00:16:53.919
Can you uh just to pick up a bit on that?
00:16:54.159 --> 00:17:02.960
What is it that's led to that shift between communities collecting data, which has been happening for a long time, to communities becoming involved in their analysis, which is more recent?
00:17:03.120 --> 00:17:05.279
How and why has that shift occurred?
00:17:05.359 --> 00:17:07.359
Because it seems like quite a fundamental one.
00:17:07.759 --> 00:17:08.319
Yes.
00:17:08.720 --> 00:17:20.720
I think the there's been greater realization um that when data is taken away and analyzed, it's looked at at a different lens.
00:17:21.039 --> 00:17:38.160
And and then when you have when you put communities uh in public-facing um fora, they do not articulate as well as their development partners.
00:17:39.440 --> 00:17:52.000
And and we realize when they articulate from a place of understanding, uh, it is far, far more effective than if if I do it as a development practitioner.
00:17:52.319 --> 00:17:52.400
Yeah.
00:17:52.720 --> 00:17:53.839
I can see you nodding here, Temi.
00:17:54.000 --> 00:17:56.559
So maybe give us some of your perspective on this from Lagos.
00:17:57.119 --> 00:17:58.960
No, so I agree absolutely.
00:17:59.119 --> 00:18:10.720
I would say that the sorts of data that the government is likely to respond to in academia where I come from, we call it um like quantitative data.
00:18:10.880 --> 00:18:25.759
Um, in sort of more regular terms, I would say maybe pointed data in terms of um it gives you a sense of like when you measure something, like you put numbers to, I don't know, 30% of households in Kibera do not have this.
00:18:25.920 --> 00:18:28.079
Um it feels concrete, right?
00:18:28.400 --> 00:18:37.839
Um and so we find that in the Lagos context, at least, um policymakers are more likely to engage with that kind of um um just concrete um data.
00:18:38.000 --> 00:18:50.640
Um but just going back a few paces is that question of um, yeah, why is it important to get the communities um involved or at the center of it is you know, who defines what's important to measure?
00:18:50.720 --> 00:18:52.640
I think that's that's so critical.
00:18:52.880 --> 00:19:01.279
Um you have people coming in with instruments, um, surveys from you know, generated somewhere, I don't know, yeah, randomly.
00:19:01.440 --> 00:19:08.559
Um, but no one is better placed to determine and define what's important to measure um than communities themselves.
00:19:08.640 --> 00:19:13.119
So it's integrating um even um just supporting.
00:19:13.200 --> 00:19:34.000
So our our role as academia, we're seeing it more and more in ACRC used to just facilitate the the um the design of instruments um yeah in in those communities, and then everything from like um implementing them to deploying them rather to um collecting the data to interpreting the results.
00:19:34.079 --> 00:19:40.640
Yes, indeed, they do need to be central to that because that fundamentally changes the it flips the script.
00:19:41.599 --> 00:19:46.240
Um the the the questions that have been asked are are are really important.
00:19:46.559 --> 00:19:50.799
That they're as important as that's what would determine the answers that come out, right?
00:19:51.039 --> 00:19:53.519
So um, and yeah, who's asking?
00:19:53.599 --> 00:19:56.960
So that and that viewpoint is always different when it's from the communities.
00:19:57.200 --> 00:20:09.680
So maybe you can because you you mentioned about your role as academics, and I'm I'm guessing I may be wrong that this this kind of approach is newer to you, perhaps, than Jack, because obviously he's he's been working with SDI for a long time in this kind of methodology.
00:20:09.920 --> 00:20:17.119
But so I wanted to talk briefly about your two different positions uh before we get into the city context and your learning from each other in that way.
00:20:17.279 --> 00:20:26.640
But how is it for you, being based in a university, you know, what what has this opened up for you that you couldn't have done or you weren't be you wouldn't have been doing in previous research?
00:20:26.880 --> 00:20:27.279
Yeah.
00:20:27.839 --> 00:20:34.079
And what have been the challenges as well of working on this in this way out of an academic institution as opposed to a community organization?
00:20:34.720 --> 00:20:34.880
Yeah.
00:20:35.039 --> 00:20:48.079
So just to say, uh my colleagues and I, I think we've struggled a bit to um sort of change um ways of working within because again, they're just different incentives that we respond to in academia.
00:20:48.319 --> 00:20:58.480
Um even when we have been working with communities for forever, seemingly, um, I think what ACRC has allowed us to do is to walk the talk, I would say.
00:20:58.640 --> 00:21:03.759
So it's kind of easy to write papers that say communities should be at the center of processes.
00:21:04.000 --> 00:21:17.680
What's um less easy is how do you operationalize that and how do you relinquish power really, uh, you know, to make that happen on an um equitable level.
00:21:17.920 --> 00:21:26.720
Um so we've had um a steep learning curve, um, but we are the better for it.
00:21:27.119 --> 00:21:33.440
Um we are we've been able to just come up with just richer, richer insights, right?
00:21:33.839 --> 00:21:40.160
Um and co-production is not just a term from a textbook um any anymore.
00:21:40.400 --> 00:21:46.079
Um it's been really revealing working, especially with SDI um groups.
00:21:46.400 --> 00:21:55.200
Um at some points early in the process, you know, there's a bit of tension just from either from both sides at the at the city level.
00:21:55.519 --> 00:22:04.880
Um, but again, just walking through those has also contributed to uh Trust building very essential for any kind of change to happen.
00:22:05.759 --> 00:22:10.079
And yeah, that has really impacted results on the cloud.
00:22:10.400 --> 00:22:19.920
I wonder, I'm interested, but picking up on this point you made about what questions are being asked and working through communities, you're finding different kinds of questions, different priorities.
00:22:20.160 --> 00:22:28.079
I wonder if you could give an example of how the questions you ask or think about as a researcher have changed as a result of working with SDI.
00:22:28.480 --> 00:22:42.880
Yeah, I would say with the climate resilience project that's been led by a researcher within the University of Lagos, coming in, you know, there's this approach of what kind of infrastructure is needed.
00:22:43.440 --> 00:22:49.440
By the way, I should say that even developing that proposal, it took, it was the longest proposal.
00:22:49.519 --> 00:22:53.119
I think it took almost two years to get to the point of yes, acceptance.
00:22:53.279 --> 00:22:59.759
I think we learned much more as a team in the development process than we did going forward.
00:23:01.039 --> 00:23:08.559
Because the initial iteration was just like standard academic proposal that you'd submit to a grant maker.
00:23:10.559 --> 00:23:14.240
And it read looking back now, it reads like something out of a textbook, really.
00:23:15.200 --> 00:23:20.400
But then we were forced to especially going through the approval process and all of it.
00:23:20.559 --> 00:23:22.480
But then this is within the within ACRC.
00:23:22.960 --> 00:23:32.799
Exactly, exactly, and forcing us to rethink uh many of the assumptions around almost like standard, okay, this is what we will, again, this is what we'll measure.
00:23:32.960 --> 00:23:47.119
We'll measure um how many home-based enterprises there are and what sorts of reinforcements they need to their um uh I don't know, to their places of business um to be able to mitigate flooding impact and things like that.
00:23:47.279 --> 00:23:55.839
Um but by the time we whittled down this proposal, it then just became okay, what do people, what does the community really want?
00:23:56.960 --> 00:24:02.559
They just want to stop their homes and surroundings flooding.
00:24:02.880 --> 00:24:13.279
Um so we went from a four-part sort of proposal from um things like I don't know, microfinance provision, for example, um strengthening home-based enterprise.
00:24:13.359 --> 00:24:14.720
That was a huge one.
00:24:14.880 --> 00:24:18.480
So actually, what is the basic, what do the community really want?
00:24:18.559 --> 00:24:23.200
And it was really, we want to stop flooding.
00:24:23.680 --> 00:24:34.480
It was it so we had added initially the empowerment components, what we thought would make a community like thrive, but at the end of the day, it was just what does the community really want?
00:24:34.720 --> 00:24:36.880
Like, do that and like they'll figure out the rest.
00:24:37.119 --> 00:24:38.799
So almost it really helps you crystallize.
00:24:38.880 --> 00:24:42.160
I think also coming out with full confidence that this is a project that matters to people.
00:24:42.480 --> 00:24:42.720
Exactly.
00:24:42.880 --> 00:24:46.559
You don't need to think, well, this question sounds interesting in theory, but does it matter?
00:24:46.799 --> 00:24:50.079
I mean, for you, Jack, you've in a sense come from the other side.
00:24:50.240 --> 00:24:56.720
And I wonder as well, um, I you've always worked with academics for a long time, I guess, including, of course, Diana Nittling.
00:24:56.880 --> 00:25:09.680
But how has ACRC and that kind of much more structured engagement with academic researchers changed the kinds of questions that you're asking, or changed perhaps the way you think about knowledge generation in your work?
00:25:10.559 --> 00:25:19.119
So this is something that we have reflected a lot about with my colleagues at SDN coming into ACRC.
00:25:19.759 --> 00:25:31.440
And the conclusion that we've arrived at is that the critical discussion that happens in development is between communities or citizens and their government.
00:25:31.680 --> 00:25:34.640
And then we've asked ourselves where do we come in?
00:25:34.799 --> 00:25:47.519
And when I say we, it includes community-based organizations, slum develop movements like SDI, are we a sufficient proxy for communities?
00:25:47.839 --> 00:25:54.400
And therefore, then our reflection has been no, no, we need to position ourselves correctly.
00:25:55.359 --> 00:26:01.200
That we are facilitators of the discussion between government and community.
00:26:01.359 --> 00:26:02.640
We are not a proxy.
00:26:03.519 --> 00:26:18.000
And therefore, just create opportunity uh for communities as termic to help us think through what we are asking, what are the nuances of what we are asking?
00:26:18.240 --> 00:26:27.920
People understand flooding differently from the way we may see it from the outside, or the ways that even a community-based organization may represent.
00:26:28.880 --> 00:26:36.720
So we we are very much seeing ourselves as facilitators and and and not representatives of communities.
00:26:37.200 --> 00:26:37.359
Yeah.
00:26:37.680 --> 00:26:50.720
But so that's interesting because if you are seeing yourself as facilitators between communities and the government rather than proxies for the community, yeah, where would you then put the university and the kind of academic researchers which you're working with closely in that mix?
00:26:50.799 --> 00:26:54.799
Are they in the same position as you or somewhere else in that relationship?
00:26:55.599 --> 00:26:57.920
We think they're they're critical partners.
00:26:58.960 --> 00:27:20.559
Uh I think uh academia serves to help us um structure, uh formulate uh concepts, uh and also a little bit legitimize what communities uh produce, the knowledge that communities uh produce.
00:27:21.039 --> 00:27:25.119
So they're critical, they're very critical to uh to the whole equation.
00:27:25.440 --> 00:27:30.960
So building on that, like the question I put to Tammy, which was in a way like how are the questions that you've asked different?
00:27:31.200 --> 00:27:46.240
In your case as well, working with whether it's with academia more or with ACRC specifically, and the conceptual framing and the whole sort of uh aim of the program, is there something now where you're asking questions a bit differently than you would have before?
00:27:48.079 --> 00:27:48.720
Yes.
00:27:49.039 --> 00:28:02.559
Um, because we are involving communities both in the research design and all the way through uh through analysis and communities.
00:28:02.799 --> 00:28:05.599
Um I'll give you an example.
00:28:06.319 --> 00:28:11.759
Uh we have a question that asks, are you a tenant or are you a landlord?
00:28:12.880 --> 00:28:18.240
And then communities say, Do you know not all tenants are equal?
00:28:18.319 --> 00:28:20.480
And and we say, What do you mean not all tenants?
00:28:20.640 --> 00:28:21.519
Do they pay rent?
00:28:21.680 --> 00:28:23.279
And they say, Yes, they pay rent.
00:28:24.000 --> 00:28:40.079
Uh but they say in a particular geography, uh your rights as a tenant, even as a landlord, uh vary, one based on your ethnicity and the prevailing ethnicity, how long you have been there.
00:28:40.640 --> 00:28:46.799
Um you have varying levels of vulnerability.
00:28:47.119 --> 00:28:54.079
Uh so we look at that and we say, we thought it was a very simple question, landlord or tenant.
00:28:54.240 --> 00:28:57.200
And then they say, no, no, no, let's look at it differently.
00:28:57.440 --> 00:29:07.839
So that helps sort of inform um how we structure um and and and how we present ideas.
00:29:08.319 --> 00:29:18.160
Then of course, academia helps us sort of shape that into into some coherent uh narrative.
00:29:18.720 --> 00:29:28.400
And I think, I mean, with ACRC, obviously there's also this whole structure of people who focus on uptake and uh you know engaging different stakeholders and, of course, building these coalitions, right?
00:29:28.480 --> 00:29:29.440
These coalitions of reform.
00:29:29.599 --> 00:29:42.720
So thinking about the levers of change in cities, which I think for me is one of the things that's quite special about ACRC is how the whole collectivity of actors can work together to think about what are those levers of change in a specific city.
00:29:42.880 --> 00:29:58.400
Um, so maybe building on that, I want to turn to this question of the context in which you work and particularly how you you learn through exchanges between cities, um, where actually the levers for change in Nairobi may be very different from those in Lagos.
00:29:58.480 --> 00:30:04.079
So you may want to achieve the same ultimate aim, and the communities may want the same thing, but how you get there could be different.
00:30:04.400 --> 00:30:08.400
You've recently had this very exciting exchanges between Lagos and Nairobi.
00:30:08.640 --> 00:30:10.079
I want to ask you a bit more about those.
00:30:10.160 --> 00:30:22.960
But first, starting with you, Jack, maybe about this um this methodology of exchange, of learning through exchanges in itself is something SDI has been doing between cities, but also between communities, which may be in the same city.
00:30:23.119 --> 00:30:29.599
So, how does the exchange, the learning between different places, uh feature as a part of the SDI approach?
00:30:30.319 --> 00:30:30.640
Okay.
00:30:31.599 --> 00:30:32.720
So very important.
00:30:33.680 --> 00:30:47.440
Uh, when we talk about exchanges, we are not saying one city go to another city to learn, it is one city going to another city to participate in something that is happening there.
00:30:47.759 --> 00:30:52.640
So there's no workshop style um learning.
00:30:53.039 --> 00:31:08.720
It is just common experience with us, and it provides you opportunity to to reflect on your own scenario, um, maybe adopt it or find reasons why it doesn't work for you.
00:31:09.440 --> 00:31:11.440
So that's one important aspect.
00:31:11.680 --> 00:31:36.880
And then the second important aspect is that and and and we try to do peer-to-peer, which is not only community to community, we try and develop a team that is both city government, community, maybe some other partners, it could be academia, and we try and organize that their peers.
00:31:37.039 --> 00:31:44.640
So city government to city government and community to community have some um interaction.
00:31:45.359 --> 00:31:49.680
What we find, uh, and and this has been an interesting lesson.
00:31:49.759 --> 00:31:51.759
I don't know the science behind it.
00:31:52.160 --> 00:32:03.759
Uh when people go on exchange and see their peers do something, uh they are inspired, which is more than the knowledge.
00:32:04.400 --> 00:32:12.400
I think all their instincts are affirmed that it's okay to deal with communities in this way.
00:32:12.720 --> 00:32:25.119
Uh, so we think that um aspect of um affirming what a government may do or what a community can do is very critical to their methodology.
00:32:25.359 --> 00:32:25.440
Yeah.
00:32:25.759 --> 00:32:28.000
And it's about it's about being face to face, obviously.
00:32:28.079 --> 00:32:36.319
And but it's also about being in something quite visceral and embodied about being in the space, participating, very true, not just sitting in an air-conditioned hotel room like we're in now.
00:32:37.440 --> 00:32:41.599
Um but so tell me for you, because you the initial trip was Lagos to Nairobi.
00:32:41.920 --> 00:32:42.160
Yes.
00:32:42.319 --> 00:32:45.119
So there was a sense in which there was learning from Nairobi.
00:32:45.440 --> 00:32:47.920
I mean, I know the learning will will come both ways, we'll get to that.
00:32:48.079 --> 00:32:49.519
But can you tell us what motivated that?
00:32:49.599 --> 00:32:52.000
Was there a particular project you wanted to know more about?
00:32:52.480 --> 00:32:53.039
Yes.
00:32:53.279 --> 00:32:59.119
So it was the Wash project, the water and sanitation one in Okeru in and Lagos.
00:32:59.279 --> 00:33:12.160
And so we've had this um STI affiliate um that is supporting um the Federation in Nigeria, and they are the implementing agency for the Wash Projects.
00:33:12.240 --> 00:33:14.960
They're the ones implementing the projects in the community.
00:33:15.200 --> 00:33:34.400
Um and it's a very young organization, um, young and promising, and basically just trying to take a shortcut to the top, um, just uh recognizing that you know there are there are people who have been in the trenches, as we say, um, for years.
00:33:34.640 --> 00:33:43.759
And um AMT, that's um Akiba Machinani Trust, um, who's been they've been within the SDI network um as well um for for years.
00:33:44.160 --> 00:34:01.839
Um and so in Nairobi, they'd uh been doing this fantastic work around water and sanitation um in Mukuru, um densely populated informal settlement there, and they managed to make progress despite great odds.
00:34:02.079 --> 00:34:08.320
That in itself, like that, the way that they had overcome um great odds was it.
00:34:08.559 --> 00:34:20.480
I mean, the odds were not nearly um the odds that we were facing in in that Lagos community were not nearly as great as the ones that had been overcome or surmounted in in Mukuru.
00:34:20.880 --> 00:34:34.159
Um and so we're like, okay, um, yeah, we're trying to do this project that you know has been done in a different, yes, different context, but um the challenges were greater if if if if anything, um and they've managed to do this.
00:34:34.239 --> 00:34:37.679
Let's go and experience what they have um done.
00:34:37.920 --> 00:34:41.119
And it was um it was a truly inspiring experience.
00:34:41.760 --> 00:34:50.960
Can you tell us a bit more about why you say, just for those who don't know the context, why you say the odds were even greater in Nairobi than than you faced in the Lagos community or Caribbean?
00:34:52.079 --> 00:34:52.719
Yes.
00:34:53.440 --> 00:35:39.039
So I'm chuckling because uh Nairobi colleagues, when they then came to Lagos, I'm sort of fast-wording now, they got to the community and said, This is this is not an informal like you you you actually have uh roads that you can see, maybe not necessarily paved, but you have a layout, you have um brick and mortar houses, you have so in terms of just the socioeconomic sort of levels um there and the level of um seeming I don't know, organization of the community, just on the uh physical, special level, it was highly um shall we say semi-formal um in the Lagos case.
00:35:39.199 --> 00:35:44.480
In the Lagos case versus the informal set in in um in Nairobi.
00:35:45.119 --> 00:35:56.159
Um and so just from a special physical planning perspective, um, it was so much harder to get things done, um specially in Nairobi than it would be here.
00:35:56.320 --> 00:36:05.440
Um however, and maybe I'm sort of jumping ahead of your question now, um Nairobi also had um things going for it that Lagos didn't have.
00:36:05.599 --> 00:36:20.559
Um and I think a major thing is the work that had been done, groundwork that had been led by STI, SDI affiliates, um, AMT-led coalition on getting Makuru Dick led an SP, a special planning area.
00:36:20.880 --> 00:36:26.159
Um and that had involved a lot of resistance and struggle and all of that.
00:36:26.320 --> 00:36:45.360
So there'd been a lot of um um work that then allowed for, okay, when the opportunity then came to then begin to do this um this actual work delivering um infrastructure, like all of a sudden, like those odds didn't seem as as great anymore because they've done this years of the yeah.
00:36:45.519 --> 00:36:48.400
So that social and community infrastructure in already was quite strong.
00:36:48.480 --> 00:36:49.840
There'd been a long history, yeah.
00:36:50.000 --> 00:37:07.519
And that was key to so for people who aren't familiar with the project, the Mukuru Wash Project was really about providing new forms of infrastructure of water and sanitation, last mile sewerage and sanitation, toilets on individual plots to allow people to access toilets who who couldn't previously.
00:37:07.760 --> 00:37:08.639
But can you tell us?
00:37:08.719 --> 00:37:27.679
So you've mentioned some of the things that are different, but as you went with the team to Mukuru for the first time to do this exchange, to participate in a community, what were some of the things that most surprised you, impressed you, shocked you, other than some of those things you mentioned about the strength of community organization?
00:37:28.079 --> 00:37:29.280
Was that the main thing?
00:37:29.840 --> 00:37:37.280
Yeah, the strength of the of the reform coalition um I think really did surprise us.
00:37:37.440 --> 00:37:46.320
Um and the Lagos team spent a lot of time just talking about that and how can we galvanize more sort of support and solidarity in the Lagos context?
00:37:46.400 --> 00:37:47.920
How did it happen?
00:37:48.159 --> 00:37:55.280
Um seems like it takes some doing, but what was the doing that happened in Nairobi that maybe we can transfer to Lagos?
00:37:55.440 --> 00:37:58.559
So that was um uh pleasantly surprising.
00:37:58.719 --> 00:38:10.559
But I think also the um, so that's on the one hand, but I think also the sort of sense of accountability, shall I say, on the part of the Nairobi um county government.
00:38:11.519 --> 00:38:33.039
Um where, yes, I mean this push and pull, but as at the time that we went, I think the county government had come to this place where they they had finally sort of um just agreed or acquiesced to the fact that um they are responsible for providing these citizens in this informal settlement with this service.
00:38:33.280 --> 00:38:37.280
Um and sort of feeling a sense of responsibility to do that.
00:38:37.440 --> 00:38:51.679
Um that was some that's something that um was not in our experience in Lagos where we're still in the position coming from uh well on the back foot, trying to persuade the government that these communities are worth serving in this way or worth including in this way.
00:38:51.760 --> 00:39:00.000
Um so sort of the greater um recep receptiveness of of the county government in in Nairobi was actually quite surprising.
00:39:00.159 --> 00:39:06.559
Again, that that's building on layers and layers of years and years of work by the coalitions to get to that point.
00:39:06.639 --> 00:39:09.599
But the fact that we had gotten to that point with the government was really good.
00:39:10.000 --> 00:39:14.800
I mean, this attitude change of the government is obviously really quite central to the and and it builds on a lot, as you've said.
00:39:14.880 --> 00:39:23.679
But Jack, perhaps you can give us some reflections on on how that happened and how transferable you think that might be as a as a process.
00:39:24.400 --> 00:39:24.719
Okay.
00:39:25.519 --> 00:39:31.119
So I appreciate everything that Jimmy says, and I totally agree with her.
00:39:31.840 --> 00:39:40.480
And I think um one thing that we appreciate is the different scales in which we are working.
00:39:41.679 --> 00:39:49.280
Lagos is dealing with 24 million uh residents, Nairobi is dealing with 5 million residents.
00:39:49.920 --> 00:40:01.280
I think their scale is uh it's a multiplier, and therefore their their politics and uh and uh is a bit more complicated than uh our politics.
00:40:01.920 --> 00:40:17.599
But having said that, um Nairobi has got the benefit of community organizing as an approach, not in only within SDI, with other civil society actors.
00:40:17.840 --> 00:40:30.800
I think for 30, 40 years now, I think that some critical mass has been arrived at so that the city has learned how to partner with communities.
00:40:32.239 --> 00:40:35.440
I think Lagos is in that process.
00:40:36.320 --> 00:40:44.400
And and I trust Lagos will get there, and when it does, it it'll be a superpower in in urban change.
00:40:44.719 --> 00:40:52.079
I think they're still in that process of build investing in communities to be actors.
00:40:53.119 --> 00:40:53.760
Yeah.
00:40:54.159 --> 00:40:54.559
Thank you.
00:40:54.719 --> 00:41:17.760
Yeah, I mean, one of the things I I did want to ask, I mean, so one thing, and I I will say something about the contrast between Nairobi and Lagos as it perhaps strikes me and uh on a quite uh basic level, uh you've mentioned the scale, and we know the history of organizing in Nairobi is somewhat stronger around this kind of community organization in an uh organization in informal settlement.
00:41:18.079 --> 00:41:22.960
But there's also a level of fragmentation to infrastructure in Lagos that's quite distinctive.
00:41:23.039 --> 00:41:38.000
So even though you've made the point that you it didn't look so much like an informal settlement to the people who came from Kenya, um, beneath the surface, the levels of connection to sewerage water are I think lower, significantly lower in Lagos than they are in Nairobi.
00:41:38.880 --> 00:41:42.159
So overcoming there's an institutional and an infrastructural fragmentation.
00:41:42.400 --> 00:41:56.079
But I've also, in my own, you know, fairly brief experiences in Lagos, been struck by the level of innovation, often among perhaps um people, entrepreneurs, like people, but also communities, in trying to overcome these problems.
00:41:56.239 --> 00:42:02.960
So I feel like that the the the fragmentation of infrastructure and institutions in Lagos drives a certain amount of innovation.
00:42:03.280 --> 00:42:09.920
And I'm wondering whether that the the solutions that they might have to come up with in that context might be a bit different than those in Nairobi.
00:42:10.159 --> 00:42:16.480
So I'm not sure how that factors in your thinking because the political and infrastructure context is very different.
00:42:16.880 --> 00:42:17.519
Yeah.
00:42:18.960 --> 00:42:19.920
That's not really a question.
00:42:20.079 --> 00:42:23.360
No, no, but but but Tom, you're very right.
00:42:23.920 --> 00:42:44.400
Um in the support that we thought we could provide to Lagos is to say, can we work with your communities and then allow your city government and your politicians to guide what solutions emerge.
00:42:44.559 --> 00:42:51.039
And and we are very clear, our solutions are not necessarily transferable to Lagos.
00:42:51.360 --> 00:42:59.440
And and Temi and uh projects there are very accepting of, yeah, let's do data collection.
00:42:59.760 --> 00:43:04.880
Let us talk about how you organize communities and then allow us to have a conversation.
00:43:05.039 --> 00:43:06.320
And Tom, you're very right.
00:43:06.480 --> 00:43:12.400
I think the solutions may be very different or they may be similar, they may learn from each other.
00:43:12.719 --> 00:43:13.280
Thanks, Jack.
00:43:13.440 --> 00:43:14.239
You're very right.
00:43:14.400 --> 00:43:18.960
Um, and I think that really speaks to the value of um exchange programs.
00:43:19.360 --> 00:43:32.719
Um, because like growing up in Lagos, if you've been in Lagos all your life, never gone to, or even if you go to other cities, you don't necessarily engage with what's underneath the surface, what makes those cities run.
00:43:33.039 --> 00:43:42.159
Um you could be forgiven for thinking that every human being in the world um has a borehole in their back backyard.
00:43:42.480 --> 00:43:45.920
And you know, exactly exact exactly.
00:43:46.079 --> 00:43:48.159
So that's the model, that's the mental model.
00:43:48.400 --> 00:43:55.599
Um and so you don't even know as a citizen to ask your government to do better.
00:43:55.920 --> 00:43:56.159
Yeah.
00:43:56.400 --> 00:44:07.840
You know, so yes, I agree that you know, all of the bottom of the Individual community innovation, it's great because we do what we have to do anyway to sort of survive.
00:44:08.000 --> 00:44:23.840
But I think the added value of being able to see how things are done differently elsewhere can then bring people can bring that back home and you know realize there are potentially other ways of you know making this um more inclusive, more equitable.
00:44:24.000 --> 00:44:33.280
Because what the sort of individual model does is it creates, you know, people do um according to their their ability, like their economic ability.
00:44:33.440 --> 00:44:35.360
And that's as we know, there's a lot of inequality.
00:44:35.440 --> 00:44:39.679
So you then still see inequality in the source of individual solutions that are generated.
00:44:40.079 --> 00:44:54.079
Um so especially in that context, you do need a sort of um leveling, if I, you know, if I may, a leveling um force of the state to sort of spread resources uh more um equitably.
00:44:54.559 --> 00:45:01.360
Um and that's what we're hoping will really pick up in Lagos.
00:45:02.000 --> 00:45:03.519
Individual solutions are great.
00:45:03.599 --> 00:45:08.079
Uh you know, Nigerians are among the most innovative people on the planet.
00:45:08.239 --> 00:45:17.840
Um, but you do not want to be exacerbating inequality on the scale of 24 million people in the city or 200 million plus people in the city.
00:45:18.320 --> 00:45:26.079
So I guess that's the in-laid of a lot of that innovation, and people have had to come up with these solutions, but they have often led to quite individualized solutions.
00:45:26.239 --> 00:45:38.000
And that's so it's interesting because in Nairobi, all of that work that has happened to get the government to accept informal settlements more and expand access to systems which are there and can be expanded, even though it's technically hard.
00:45:38.320 --> 00:45:40.320
That political change was so important.
00:45:40.480 --> 00:45:44.960
It's like in Lagos, you need to change the attitude of the government, but that won't be enough in itself.
00:45:45.119 --> 00:45:52.400
You also need to build a well- the infrastructure is is a huge challenge because turning individual infrastructure into collective is hard.
00:45:52.800 --> 00:45:54.880
But also building that collective approach.
00:45:54.960 --> 00:46:02.800
But hopefully collecting the data, doing that community-led work, can both help to change the government's mind and build that sense of a more collective approach.
00:46:02.960 --> 00:46:04.719
I guess that's part of the Hopefully, yes.
00:46:05.440 --> 00:46:13.360
And that just to come back to that data collection, because it's so central both to the change in government attitude and the building of a collective approach.
00:46:13.679 --> 00:46:26.079
Um how because to some people, maybe this enumeration, you know, counting, mapping, which has been really central to the SDI approach, it's not obvious why that would lead to these changes.
00:46:26.559 --> 00:46:32.159
What do you see, Jack, as the link between community-led data collection and political change?
00:46:33.840 --> 00:46:35.039
Very good question.
00:46:36.000 --> 00:46:48.480
I think our understanding is that um politicians do not necessarily read research reports or attend workshops.
00:46:49.440 --> 00:46:59.920
But if the community is at of the same understanding as you, there's so many forums where they interact with their politicians.
00:47:00.880 --> 00:47:17.039
And that is where that transfusion of information happens on weekends, in the evenings, uh, and therefore it is so important that communities have reflected on these things.
00:47:17.679 --> 00:47:23.679
Otherwise, as Temi says, then people will just perpetuate what they already know.
00:47:24.639 --> 00:47:30.880
Uh so you need to change it at a certain level, whether it gets published, it's great for research.
00:47:31.519 --> 00:47:38.480
But the real interaction happens uh outside the development paradigm.
00:47:38.639 --> 00:47:41.679
It happens in very different forums.
00:47:42.320 --> 00:47:42.480
Yeah.
00:47:42.880 --> 00:47:44.719
I think that's another thing about exchanges, isn't it?
00:47:44.880 --> 00:47:50.079
Is it actually puts different people into conversations with each other, not just between cities, but within cities.
00:47:50.159 --> 00:47:57.599
So you might find some political elites are having conversations with people they wouldn't otherwise have because they're hosting visitors or this kind of thing.
00:47:57.840 --> 00:47:58.000
Yeah.
00:47:58.239 --> 00:48:07.119
I wonder as well, we've we've reflected quite a bit on the learning from Nairobi, but I I'm not sure whether you were involved in in the exchange visit to Lagos, Jack.
00:48:07.280 --> 00:48:11.119
But for the Nairobi team, what do you do you think they've learned something from Lagos too?
00:48:11.280 --> 00:48:15.360
Is there something that some learning traveling the other way?
00:48:15.760 --> 00:48:23.599
Even though the primary motive was to perhaps learn more about this success in Makuru, is there also learning from Lagos back to Nairobi?
00:48:24.320 --> 00:48:27.760
Th there definitely uh is learning.
00:48:28.400 --> 00:48:52.800
Uh and and I think uh one of the things that happens in exchanges is that you send people to Lagos, they they have an interaction in in Lagos, they come back and they say it wasn't easy, and they think about their methodology and what they're saying.
00:48:53.280 --> 00:48:59.920
Uh so they can they went to Lagos, they came back, they said we don't think we cracked it.
00:49:01.199 --> 00:49:05.360
We need to understand why we were not getting through.
00:49:05.920 --> 00:49:08.639
You don't think they they they didn't think they cracked it in Lagos?
00:49:09.119 --> 00:49:26.400
In in Lagos, they said we went, we thought we had something to say, and then we realized uh we need to be able to communicate to Lagos in a way Lagos understands.
00:49:26.639 --> 00:49:32.239
So they're reflecting on their methodology, they're reflecting on their what they went to do.
00:49:33.119 --> 00:49:36.480
So it's it's a mutual learning thing.
00:49:36.719 --> 00:49:46.719
Um it helps them refine, it helps them ask themselves questions about the assumptions that they took to Lagos.
00:49:47.760 --> 00:49:49.360
So I think it builds them, it builds them.
00:49:50.000 --> 00:49:51.920
And it helps to foster learning, right?
00:49:52.000 --> 00:49:56.880
I mean, the fact that it's not easy, it's not easy to just pass on a message and an experience for so many reasons.
00:49:56.960 --> 00:50:00.719
So sharpening the tools with which we do that is important.
00:50:01.519 --> 00:50:19.199
I think I mean we need to move towards wrapping up, but I think maybe we can end by just looking forward a bit and thinking about, I don't know, three years down the line, five years down the line, um where would you like to see things in your two cities, maybe focusing particularly on this water and sanitation interventions?
00:50:20.159 --> 00:50:22.000
What would success look like for you?
00:50:22.239 --> 00:50:27.679
And how would you know, by what measure would you judge that something had shifted and been successful?
00:50:27.840 --> 00:50:29.519
Maybe starting with you, Tammy.
00:50:29.920 --> 00:50:30.880
Yeah, thanks.
00:50:31.119 --> 00:50:42.639
Um so to quote the words of a um a government official spoken in confidence, um saying, you know what, guys, Lagos Water is not coming soon.
00:50:46.239 --> 00:50:53.360
Um that has a way of um just really you know driving the point home.
00:50:53.599 --> 00:51:22.400
Um so no, we're not looking to uh suddenly every household being um connected to pipe water um on a networked scale, but we're hoping for early commitment um in the sort of broader cause and broader vision to give every citizen, every resident uh access to safe water and sanitation, however that looks in their communities.
00:51:22.719 --> 00:51:28.000
And again, it's the communities that are best placed to sort of begin to drive that process.
00:51:28.159 --> 00:52:05.440
Um, so in OK Ruby, what we are hoping to do is demonstrate that with um women-led water committees, um, working in the first instance with the local government, um we can trial this model and then sort of a step two thing, um take that to the state government level, um, and then get that somehow into um state planning and budgeting processes where um there's public money that goes into this community projects.
00:52:05.519 --> 00:52:06.079
That's the dream.
00:52:06.400 --> 00:52:06.960
That's the dream.
00:52:07.760 --> 00:52:08.960
Yeah, that's the dream.
00:52:09.199 --> 00:52:15.039
Um, and again, I again this is why we're saying we're looking to build really strong community governance systems.
00:52:15.280 --> 00:52:30.239
So, again, how those resources flow, there doesn't be a structure um that is um accountable, again, transparent, that will is that has built capacity to manage those resources coming from um the state as well and be accountable for them.
00:52:30.400 --> 00:52:33.440
So, yeah, that that would be um an ideal.
00:52:33.840 --> 00:52:42.960
I don't know, maybe it's short to medium term, hopefully on the way to some longer term um uh citywide solution to do that.
00:52:43.039 --> 00:52:43.280
Yeah.
00:52:43.679 --> 00:52:44.480
Okay, excellent.
00:52:44.639 --> 00:52:48.639
Yeah, and Jack, for you, what does success look like at that kind of time horizon?
00:52:48.960 --> 00:53:02.159
At that so currently there is there's a policy discussion and some of the uh project details are being captured uh in poly in policy formulation.
00:53:03.519 --> 00:53:06.880
We think progressively it will move and it will become policy.
00:53:07.440 --> 00:53:16.800
Um the real proof is when we see significant investment in government budgets.
00:53:17.119 --> 00:53:22.880
Currently there's some investment into these pilots that we're doing.
00:53:23.199 --> 00:53:32.159
I think success is is when government starts to replicate without requiring investments from ACRC and and other donor partners.
00:53:32.800 --> 00:53:35.199
Uh and that that would represent success.
00:53:35.760 --> 00:53:36.000
Okay.
00:53:36.079 --> 00:53:36.239
Yeah.
00:53:36.400 --> 00:53:44.960
So yeah, that gets into questions of uh other questions that were in the back of my mind around fiscal issues, taxing and spending, and that's I think another conversation for another day.
00:53:45.119 --> 00:53:49.199
Yeah, but thank you so much for joining joining me today for this conversation.
00:53:49.360 --> 00:53:51.760
I found it extremely interesting and stimulating.
00:53:52.159 --> 00:53:53.519
Thank you, Tom, for having us.
00:53:54.079 --> 00:53:54.320
Thank you.
00:53:54.800 --> 00:53:56.320
It was it was a great discussion.
00:53:56.559 --> 00:53:57.280
Yes, thank you.
00:53:57.519 --> 00:53:58.239
Thank you.
00:54:22.480 --> 00:54:34.559
Because, you know, we're talking about community-led data and we're talking about co-production and what difference that can make to enable communities to have more power when they're speaking with uh and negotiating with their local governments and others.
00:54:34.719 --> 00:54:43.360
Um I was just wondering how important that question of power is, because in the example Temmie gave, um, when they asked the communities what they wanted, they just wanted to stop the flooding.
00:54:43.440 --> 00:54:46.960
But somehow the questions of community empowerment got pushed to one side a little bit.
00:54:47.119 --> 00:54:48.159
At least that's how I read it.
00:54:48.239 --> 00:54:51.679
I was just wondering if you could reflect a bit on that part of the conversation.
00:54:52.239 --> 00:55:03.519
But I think that comes from they're at a much earlier stage in Lagos, in terms of having the community work collectively together over time, to the point where the city government actually starts listening and engaging with them seriously.
00:55:03.679 --> 00:55:10.079
And I think she gave an example of how listening to communities help to kind of distill the essence of the problem.
00:55:10.320 --> 00:55:12.880
But that's from before they've started to engage with Nairobi.
00:55:13.119 --> 00:55:25.760
And what they're really focusing on now is actually how working to find a solution to that problem, maybe it's flooding or something else, can start to bring the community together in such a way that they have more of a collective voice and can start to become empowered.
00:55:26.000 --> 00:55:26.719
So yeah.
00:55:27.119 --> 00:55:34.320
Actually, that really reminds me of work I've done insofar as to begin with, it is quite often that communities have their own direct needs that they want to be met.
00:55:34.400 --> 00:55:43.360
Um, but it's not until they realise what they have the right to ask for, what they have the right to demand, that it starts to become more political or starts to become more about those forms of empowerment.
00:55:43.519 --> 00:55:48.559
So I mean, I really recognize that journey in context in the UK as well.
00:55:48.880 --> 00:55:53.840
I think it also relates to what Jack was saying about the involvement of the community in analysis as well as data collection.
00:55:53.920 --> 00:56:03.440
So I think the bringing the community into the analysis and the thinking about solutions is part of that journey to realizing why the empowerment and the collective empowerment is so important.
00:56:03.599 --> 00:56:10.239
Because through that you recognise the only way you can do this is to get the city government to really take you seriously, for which you need a collective power.
00:56:10.480 --> 00:56:15.039
So as they analyze the problems and potential solutions, that becomes a bigger part of the picture, I think.
00:56:15.519 --> 00:56:22.159
The other thing that really struck me, I thought this was really fascinating, it takes us onto the question of exchange, was around how your preconceptions get challenged.
00:56:22.320 --> 00:56:37.119
So, like you've got this example of um Lagos apparently not being sufficiently informal, perhaps, because it was semi-formal, but then actually beneath the surface, as you started to tease out through the conversation, there are still infrastructural deficits in those neighbourhoods.
00:56:37.360 --> 00:56:42.239
So they may appear to be one thing, but actually when you understand the way in which the city works, it might be another.
00:56:42.400 --> 00:56:47.440
And so both sides learnt so many interesting things that challenged their kind of ideas about how change works.
00:56:47.920 --> 00:56:48.480
Definitely, yeah.
00:56:48.559 --> 00:56:50.719
And I think that's partly actually about land tenure.
00:56:50.800 --> 00:57:02.800
It reminded me of Lindsay Sawyer's work with her colleagues on plotting urbanism in Lagos, because areas there which are informal or sometimes called semi-formal, um, they the the arrangements for the housing are very much informal.
00:57:02.960 --> 00:57:10.960
But because of the way the land market works, people build more formal-looking permanent structures, but actually they're incredibly fragmented in terms of infrastructure.
00:57:11.199 --> 00:57:16.559
So to the eye, the Kenyans arrived and thought, this doesn't look like shacks, you know, that we're used to in an informal settlement.
00:57:16.719 --> 00:57:17.679
So it looks more formal.
00:57:17.760 --> 00:57:24.639
But actually, beneath the surface, there was much more difficulty in getting connectivity through all kinds of infrastructure in in Lagos.
00:57:25.440 --> 00:57:29.360
And actually, in Lagos, there are different kinds of informal settlements too.
00:57:29.840 --> 00:57:37.039
There are ones that might be seen as auto-constructed, and there are ones that are built by other people through this kind of plotting and subdividing of lands that Lindsay talks about.
00:57:37.280 --> 00:57:40.800
So we also need to bear in mind not informal all informal settlements are the same.
00:57:41.280 --> 00:57:49.679
And I think that really speaks to how it enables these kinds of exchanges enable all parties to know their places in a different or perhaps a better kind of way.
00:57:49.760 --> 00:58:01.599
And so I was also struck by the space that's created through these exchanges for candid conversations and observations when Temmie said that the city uh officials in um Lagos had just said the water's not coming soon.
00:58:01.760 --> 00:58:12.559
You know, that kind of blunt candor is actually really helpful to know, obviously also to challenge perhaps, um, but in order to be able to actually understand the limits of what you're working with as well as the opportunities.
00:58:12.880 --> 00:58:13.280
I think so.
00:58:13.360 --> 00:58:24.559
And even though it's depressing for them to hear, it I think it is a small step on the journey to a more serious exchange with the city government because people are used to often having these broken promises or not being talked to at all.
00:58:24.719 --> 00:58:36.000
And it was, in a way, uh quite depressing to hear that that in Nairobi they've had 30, 40 years of community mobilization that has led towards some of the gains they're now making, and that hasn't been happening in the same way in Lagos.
00:58:36.079 --> 00:58:37.360
Hopefully it won't take so long.
00:58:37.519 --> 00:58:45.199
But I think the government being honest with you about things and talking to you about them is is better, of course, than being lied to or fobbed off with promises that never emerge.
00:58:45.760 --> 00:58:47.679
So, Beth, I I want to ask you a few questions now.
00:58:48.719 --> 00:58:53.519
Because I know that you've been involved in lots of exchanges between cities and communities, primarily in the UK.
00:58:53.760 --> 00:58:54.960
We've talked about some of that work.
00:58:55.119 --> 00:59:04.239
It also connects to the work that ACRC is doing through the work you've been doing with community savers and those learning experiences between African communities and those in Manchester and Sheffield.
00:59:04.719 --> 00:59:15.519
So I wonder what you're you've been learning in your work on exchanges about how people learn from each other, including how they learn about how to bring about change and pull those political levers in their own context.
00:59:15.599 --> 00:59:18.639
Aaron Ross Powell Yeah, so we've been comparing three different kinds of exchanges.
00:59:18.800 --> 00:59:32.320
One that was very much similar to the SDI methodology, where communities are learning from each other, one that was a mixed exchange between city officials, academics, artists, activists, and residents, and others that were more about bilateral exchanges.
00:59:32.559 --> 00:59:37.760
And what's really interesting in all of these exchanges is that the same kind of themes as you've been picking up here come out.
00:59:37.920 --> 00:59:39.920
I mean, one of them is about how long it takes, right?
00:59:40.000 --> 00:59:44.960
You're not going to have an exchange and then just be able to implement something in your own space.
00:59:45.119 --> 00:59:46.800
And Jack was really clear on that actually.
00:59:46.960 --> 00:59:52.159
I think what we found is that these exchanges open up the horizon of possibility for people to think differently.
00:59:52.320 --> 00:59:55.440
And what's happening in that exchange is a moment of comparison.
00:59:55.519 --> 01:00:01.199
So people are able to actually understand their own experiences from the perspective of someone else's.
01:00:01.280 --> 01:00:04.639
It makes you see things differently that could be, as well as how things are.
01:00:04.800 --> 01:00:09.920
And in that moment of comparison, that's what really changes the possibility for social transformation.
01:00:10.079 --> 01:00:13.519
So what we're beginning to understand is what happens in that moment of comparison.
01:00:13.679 --> 01:00:18.000
And I think it's about strengthening self-efficacy, you know, your belief that you can make change.
01:00:18.320 --> 01:00:20.639
It's about strengthening your sense of entitlement.
01:00:20.800 --> 01:00:22.320
Like what are we allowed to ask for?
01:00:22.480 --> 01:00:23.599
What could that look like?
01:00:23.840 --> 01:00:31.119
And also your sort of group solidarity and your sense of being together is also formed by having those kinds of exchanges.
01:00:31.360 --> 01:00:47.760
I think the thing that really struck me out of what Jack and Temmie were discussing was also how the exchange is part of that facilitation mechanism that enables like SDI or enables the academics to somehow step aside to sort of help the relationship between citizens and the state, but then step back.
01:00:47.920 --> 01:00:49.119
And I think that's so important.
01:00:49.199 --> 01:01:07.039
I love the way that Jack talked about that, being able to see how the citizens then actually are able to tell their own stories, to know their own places, and how city officials then recognise that communities have a place at the table because they are fundamentally part of the solutions and the ways in which they need to make decisions.
01:01:07.360 --> 01:01:10.079
Yeah, I think that point he made because it's often a misunderstanding, right?
01:01:10.239 --> 01:01:12.239
Who is saying we are not a proxy for the community.
01:01:12.639 --> 01:01:14.880
And that's kind of misunderstood sometimes on all sides.
01:01:15.039 --> 01:01:16.719
These organizations represent the community.
01:01:16.880 --> 01:01:19.119
So we don't, we facilitate in in between.
01:01:19.280 --> 01:01:20.400
And that was very clear.
01:01:20.639 --> 01:01:25.679
And I think, yeah, just to pick up on your point about comparison, that is really obviously at the heart of what we're talking about.
01:01:25.760 --> 01:01:30.400
And it's for me, it's exciting and new because I've always done comparative work on cities.
01:01:30.480 --> 01:01:35.039
And even when the comparison is implicit, you're looking at one place, but you're implicitly comparing in your mind.
01:01:35.199 --> 01:01:38.400
But but what's newer to me is this co-production of comparison, right?
01:01:38.719 --> 01:01:43.920
Comparing through a community lens rather than just through your own individual mental models.
01:01:44.480 --> 01:01:51.280
On that note, I thought maybe we could end with you saying a little bit more about your wider work on co-production and this co-profutures inquiry you've been leading.
01:01:51.599 --> 01:01:53.119
Well, it's interesting just to pick that point up.
01:01:53.199 --> 01:01:59.679
So obviously there's a big literature in urban studies, just to speak back to our discipline about comparative urbanism and what that actually looks like.
01:01:59.760 --> 01:02:02.000
But I think co-productive urbanism is different.
01:02:02.079 --> 01:02:10.800
And one of the fundamental ways it's different is that it decentres the academic in that process of comparison, where we are enabling and it's shortcuts to social transformation.
01:02:11.119 --> 01:02:11.760
I think so.
01:02:11.840 --> 01:02:26.960
What I'm looking at in the UK is how universities can create better conditions for co-produced and participatory research with our communities here, but also in relation to our international partnerships, doing that with Liz Richardson and Catherine DeRose at Manchester and Liverpool universities.
01:02:27.199 --> 01:02:31.920
And it's really interesting because we often don't see our roles as facilitators.
01:02:32.000 --> 01:02:38.559
And that point that Diana's made so powerfully over the years that Jack was also saying in TEMI is that you have to be prepared to give a bit of your power up.
01:02:38.719 --> 01:02:46.960
It's very difficult to do so when we are in these institutions that judge us and rank our behaviours and our performances in very particular ways.
01:02:47.039 --> 01:03:00.079
So we do need some fundamental shifts in how we think about the structures and cultures of universities in order to make the kind of thing you guys are doing more easy and actually then more effective at producing these things we want increased.
01:03:00.639 --> 01:03:00.880
Great.
01:03:00.960 --> 01:03:03.280
Well it's really wonderful to have had your reflections on this.
01:03:03.519 --> 01:03:08.159
It's a shame you weren't there for the actual discussion, but I found this reflection really valuable.
01:03:08.559 --> 01:03:09.199
Thank you.
01:03:09.440 --> 01:03:10.320
See you all next time.
01:03:10.960 --> 01:03:11.440
Bye.