درباره این اپیزود
In the season finale of UnCommon Law, we explore the power of AI to transform legal practice. Featuring insights from top law professors, a federal judge, and industry leaders like John Quinn, founder of Quinn Emanuel, we ask: Can AI’s promise of efficiency overcome its risks—and redefine the future of law?
Guests:
- John Quinn, founder of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
- Daniel Ho, professor of law and computer science at Stanford University
- David Hoffman, professor of law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School
- Isabel Gottlieb, reporter for Bloomberg Law covering AI and issues impacting corporate legal departments
***
Host/Producer: Matthew S. Schwartz
Editor/Executive Producer: Josh Block
Additional Editing: Andrew Satter
Cover Art: Jonathan Hurtarte
انگلیسی
ایالات متحده آمریکا
رونوشت 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
جستجوی اپیزودهای گذشته
اپیزودهای قبلی UnCommon Law را جستجو کن.
قسمت های دیگر در این پادکست
Wayne Reichle – who’s been in the fishing business his whole life – had never heard of the Chevron doctrine. That's the two-step legal test that courts used for the past 40 years to decide whether a federal agency had the authority to make a regulation.
"No idea," said Reichle, president of New Je…
Generative AI has promised to reshape the practice of law ever since ChatGPT emerged. However, it's been unclear just how large law firms are using AI. Has it changed how practitioners do their jobs on a daily basis? Are we witnessing the emergence of a revolution in how lawyers do their work?
Unco…
Congress often passes major legislation setting out broad principles, and then lets the federal agencies sort out the details. But what should an agency do if Congress’s instructions are ambiguous or silent?
That was the question facing the Supreme Court 40 years ago, when the Reagan administration…
This season on UnCommon Law, join us as we explore the rise and fall of agency power, and what that could mean for the future of regulation in America.
Federal agencies expanding their power beyond congressional intent? Unelected bureaucrats making policy decisions? Regulatory whiplash?! According to the litigants urging the Supreme Court to strike down the Chevron doctrine in the Loper Bright case, those were the harms Americans would continue to…
سلب مسئولیت: پادکست و آثار هنری تعبیه شده در این صفحه متعلق به Bloomberg Industry Group است که متعلق به صاحب آن است و به Listen Notes، Inc وابسته یا تایید نشده است.
ویرایش
از کمک شما برای بروز نگهداشتن پایگاهدادههای پادکست سپاسگزاریم
