درباره این اپیزود
It’s been a blur.
The last couple of weeks I’ve been busier than a one-legged man in a butt-kicking contest. But, as promised, I’ve continued to dig into the complexities of weather modification. There is a long and documented history of government research and funding of weather modification techniques that dates back to at least the 1940s.
To provide just one of many tangible examples, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation took an explicit interest in weather modification back in 1947. Shortly thereafter, the Bureau funded Project Skywater in order to develop “large field experiments and programs to test the practical application of seeding technology.”
From their own archives:
“Project Skywater complemented the general research program already initiated by the National Science Foundation as well as the specific weather programs studying hurricanes at the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration and fog dispersal at the departments of Defense and Transportation.”
I’m dropping that link straight out of the gate to negate any accusations that government weather modification is some sort of crackpot conspiracy.
Clearly that’s not the case.
It is a 100% proven and irrefutable fact that cloud seeding and other weather modification programs have been being deployed for decades, and we’d all be wise to wrestle with the implications. To drive home the legitimacy of this issue before moving forward, please consider these additional sources, which further substantiate just how mainstream and extensive weather modification programs have become:
* American Meteorological Society’s Early History of Weather Modification (1968)
* NOAA National Weather Modification Policies and Programs (1979)
* NRC Status of US Weather Modification Research and Operations (2003)
* CIA Survey of Weather Modification (Released 2013)
* U.S. Government Accountability Office Report on Cloud Seeding (2024)
Again, we must confront the fact that the science of “cloud seeding” is legit, and that this technology has been being used for much longer than people realize.
But does that mean that conspiracies about “chemtrails” are real?
We’re not there yet.
Setting aside the fact that the government is trying to play God, many useful idiots will make the case that all of this weather modification is entirely benign. You see, the government is just trying to help the farmers and all of this spraying stuff into the atmosphere to change weather patterns is really for the greater good—honest.
It’s always for the greater good, isn’t it?
That said, given the cold, hard fact that weather modification is a thing, I’d like to turn our attention to the fanatical environmentalists who are trying to block out the sun—but first, let’s connect a few rudimentary dots to prime the logical mind:
* Cloud seeding forms clouds, duh.
* Clouds block out the sun by reflecting sunlight.
* Some people are trying to block out the sun to “save the planet.”
With that in mind, it’s not that much of a stretch to think that the radical environmental cult of today might be using these tried and true techniques of weather modification to advance their own insane Net Zero agenda, is it?
Quick story.
I’m outside every day. I live out in the country with a panoramic view. I look at the sky a lot. Sometime last summer, I started noticing a lot of strange lines in the sky, and these strange lines were definitely NOT some new flight pattern.
The lines were so strange, I started taking pictures of them:
As I started paying attention, I noticed there were often two planes flying a pattern making parallel lines, then they circle back and make a big crisscross in the sky. Strange indeed. Stranger still, the lines seemed to disperse in a weird sort of way.
These certainly did not look like normal clouds, and they seemed much lower and lingered much longer than the typical contrails left by commercial flights:
Now then, I have to tell you, I’ve met a lot of people who have been all over the “chemtrails” issue for a long time. I’ve always taken it with a grain of salt—not dismissing the possibility of someone spraying chemicals in the sky, but not really knowing what to do with it.
While talking about chemtrails is a hip and important topic in some circles, it’s a subject that gets zero traction and plenty of ridicule in others.
Regardless, I was definitely watching planes flying in repetitive patterns, making strange lines in the sky. What’s more, there was quite often—but not always—about a two-day delay before the weather would change. The temperature would drop, the clouds would roll in, the wind would pick up, and many times it would rain.
I mentioned this pattern to a close friend, and he made the same observations.
So, the question became inevitable: what the hell is going on up there?
As alluded to in several recent reports, I believe these strange lines in the sky are most likely related to experiments that are currently being conducted to block out the sun in my local area—and believe me, I know just how ridiculous that sounds!
That’s why this report has been slow in the making. In order to do it right, I had to spend the time digging in and not just chasing rabbits down the rabbit hole.
IF these experiments are happening, there HAS to be proof.
It’s not enough that social media is all-a-twitter about #LOOKUP.
It’s not enough that people across the country are posting pictures like this:
And it’s also not enough that people all around the world have been documenting these abnormal flight patterns in flight tracker apps like this:
The fact is, there is a preponderance of evidence documenting such occurrences.
Research indicates there are a bunch of radical environmentalists who are attempting to block out the sun by spraying chemicals into the atmosphere.
FACT.
In reality, this has been happening for much longer than most people realize. Many useful idiots want to casually dismiss these unnatural lines in the sky as nothing more than contrails—condensation trails—but the wise can see through the lies.
Again, this is not speculation or conspiracy.
This disturbing reality is very well documented.
On that note, if you’ve been with me, you know I’ve called out the government’s weather modification programs before. Again, they’ve been around for decades, as spelled out in the following reports:
* TR 399 - Government Seeks to Block Out Sun
* TR 584 - Globalist Gaslighting Lights Up the Night Sky
* TR 634 - On the Weaponization of Weather and Geoengineering Elections
For today, I want to provide some more specific examples to emphasize that this is not a joke. This is not a test. This is a very serious issue that needs to be addressed head on, immediately. We cannot sit idly by while a bunch of environmental wackos obsessively try to block out the sun.
That is entirely unacceptable — and yet, in certain circles, the proposition of blocking out the sun to save the planet is accepted as gospel.
As a case in point, consider the Marine Cloud Brightening Program and “small-scale field studies” (in eastern Washington?) being conducted by Washington State University. One look at the lady running the show, and you can tell that she’s a radical fruitcake who’s just giddy about the idea of blocking out the sun:
“Sustained small changes in cloud cover or in the amount of sunlight reflected by clouds have the potential to change climate both locally and globally.”
It’s worth noting that “emergency weather modification” is authorized in the Revised Code of Washington, the experiments are undeniably underway, more are coming, and there has already been pushback in some local communities.
Here’s the proof:
* RCW 70A.10.200 - Program of emergency cloud seeding authorized. (See also Chapter 278, the original Act on Emergency Cloud Seeding from 1981.)
* UW studies a drastic way to cool a warming planet, cloud brightening
* Yakima Basin irrigators explore cloud seeding as a possible option
* UW cloud brightening experiment on hold while Alameda investigates impact
Cloud brightening and cloud seeding are not the same, but they do go hand in hand. Seeding explicitly aims to make it rain (i.e. Project Skywater), while Marine Cloud Brightening aims explicitly to block out the sun and cool the planet. Regardless, both techniques spray chemicals into the sky, both techniques form more clouds, and these geoengineered clouds inevitably block out naturally occurring sunlight.
Let that sink in.
Taking it a step further, the Wilson Center — which claims to be “Congressionally Chartered. Scholarship Driven. Fiercely Nonpartisan.” — discusses WSU’s marine cloud brightening in the broader context of Solar Radiation Management. They highlight other studies being conducted around “stratospheric aerosol injection,” which is just a fancy way of saying, “spraying s**t in the sky” to block out the sun.
According to the Wilson Center:
“…stratospheric aerosol injection, would involve throwing reflective particles into the upper atmosphere. The particle might be sulfur dioxide, or, in some formulations, calcium carbonate or perhaps an engineered nanoparticle, with delivery most likely by a fleet of high-flying aircraft.”
Emphasis added.
Spraying nanoparticles into the sky? Well gosh, that kind of correlates with what all those crackpot conspiracy theorists have been trying to tell us, right?
According to WeatherGeeks.com, the “secret” to effective cloud seeding is using the right chemicals, namely silver iodide, potassium iodide, and sodium chloride. Other sources cite the use of barium and aluminum to achieve the same effect. Still more studies involve injecting “sulfate aerosol precursors and designed nanoparticles” into the atmosphere, in order to save us all from the sun.
* Reflecting Sunlight to Cool the Planet – MIT Investigates Solar Geoengineering Proposals
* Jets to spray Welsbach particles (aluminum oxide) into the atmosphere
That last link indicates that the US has agreed to spend $50 billion to advance some jackass “50-years Shield Project” (presented by Edward Teller, father of the hydrogen bomb) as a proposed solution for so-called global warming.
These people are not stupid, they are insane.
What’s more, these radical environmentalists tout all this weather modification as a “fast, cheap, and imperfect method” of cooling the planet. But unfortunately, even as they try desperately to block out the sun, they’re quick to inform us that global society will still have to get to Net Zero if we REALLY want to save the planet. Geesh.
Nevertheless, they’re rapidly hammering out the details to make it happen.
“…a program that would ramp up to a cooling impact of around 0.3 degrees Celsius could be achieved for about US$2.25 billion per year over an imagined 15 year lifespan. This kind of price tag makes stratospheric aerosol injection look a good bet in brute economic terms.”
What’s $2.25 billion for blocking out the sun, compared to the billions more spent on other absolutely asinine and ridiculous programs funded by our government?
What’s important to grasp, is that there is a lot of money being funneled into this fanatical idea. MIT says they could “start soon if they start small” in deploying this ominous idea of spraying chemicals into the atmosphere to block out the sun.
These geniuses have calculated it would only take about 100 airplanes to pull this off:
“Consequently, full-scale deployment would require a fleet of novel aircraft—a few hundred in order to achieve a 1 °C cooling target.”
While MIT tries to make the argument that such a fleet would take a decade to assemble, I believe this is a foolish assumption and an intentional head fake. How difficult would it be for a bunch of radical environmentalists with deep pockets to retrofit a few hundred airplanes and start spraying today? C’mon man!
As noted above, they are already doing this. Thus, at this point, I believe they are just trying to formalize the process and solidify public support for this outrageous scheme. Quite predictably, there is no shortage of buy-in from the radical Climate Cult.
The good news is, there are now seven states that have banned “chemtrails” and other forms of geoengineering, including “cloud seeding, weather modification, excessive electromagnetic radio frequency, and microwave radiation.” Some conservative states like Tennessee are rocking the boat by tackling this issue head on:
* Tennessee legislature passes bill banning 'chemtrails': What to know
* Tennessee passes 'chemtrail' bill banning airborne chemicals
* Tennessee lawmakers vote to ban geoengineering
That’s outstanding.
These laws formalize opposition to the idiotic fantasy that somehow blocking out the sun is going to save the planet. This legislation also legitimizes all the “conspiracy theories” by legally codifying opposition to this very real, very dark science.
Personally, I’d point to this outstanding effort to defend the very air we breathe as a clarion call to action. They are spraying our skies — there is no doubt about it.
But we CAN fight back, and we CAN win, as demonstrated by these state legislatures.
BUT HERE’S THE THING:
Most people are still completely clueless.
There are not nearly enough people questioning this poisoning of our skies. There is a stigma about chemtrails that desperately needs to be overcome.
As we’ve seen, geoengineering, weather modification, cloud seeding, solar radiation management (including the use of nanoparticles), and spraying chemicals into the sky is all publicly available information. We need to be talking about this stuff, raising awareness in our communities, and making sure our elected representatives are properly informed and willing to take a stand against this insidious scheme.
What are the long term effects of spraying all these chemicals on the unsuspecting masses? What are the long term effects of successfully blocking out the sun?
Questions abound. We should all demand answers.
Please consider this a primer on the subject, share it far and wide, and remember:
RESIST WE MUST!
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.thetorchreport.com/subscribe
