Adapting to Change: Transforming Workplace Culture with Rich Alderton | Episode 13

WEBVTT
00:00:01.784 --> 00:00:02.525
Welcome everyone.
00:00:02.525 --> 00:00:05.091
We have Rich Alderton today.
00:00:05.091 --> 00:00:13.827
We're going to explore how understanding change, psychology and immediate recognition can transform workplace behavior.
00:00:13.827 --> 00:00:17.373
And so Rich comes from.
00:00:17.373 --> 00:00:31.461
He's taken a journey from the shop floor to the boardroom, developing expertise in helping people raise their what he calls adaptability intelligence, and so he's got over 25 years experience leading change in innovative organizations.
00:00:31.461 --> 00:00:41.713
And so we come from slightly different well, not even slightly from quite fundamentally different areas in terms of affecting behavior and change and that sort of thing.
00:00:41.713 --> 00:00:46.948
And when we had a little chat last week it was I knew this would be an interesting discussion.
00:00:46.948 --> 00:00:53.186
So, rich, with that intro, I'm really happy to welcome you to this podcast.
00:00:54.249 --> 00:00:55.511
It's great to be here, james.
00:00:55.511 --> 00:00:57.640
I'm really looking forward to this.
00:00:57.640 --> 00:01:06.159
This is not a typical conversation that I have and, yeah, meeting you has fired a few neurons for me.
00:01:06.159 --> 00:01:08.543
So, yeah, looking forward to it, lovely.
00:01:09.305 --> 00:01:18.453
So can we start by you telling us a little bit of your background, your journey from the shop floor to the boardroom, and just your story, essentially.
00:01:19.219 --> 00:01:20.201
Okay, well, very quickly.
00:01:20.201 --> 00:01:28.668
Yes, I fell straight out of university onto the shop floor working the night shift on the Strepsils packing line.
00:01:28.668 --> 00:01:38.730
I wanted leadership experience as soon as I could, and working in factories seemed to be the fastest and least glamorous way to get that.
00:01:38.730 --> 00:01:43.579
So, yeah, I've spent most of my life in supply chain.
00:01:43.579 --> 00:01:44.903
I was very lucky.
00:01:45.825 --> 00:02:08.539
Having run a global supply chain in Sweden, I got the opportunity to reinvent myself into running a sales and marketing division for the company Down Under, so I was kind of next door to you in New Zealand for what ended up being nine years, which is where I set up this business.
00:02:08.920 --> 00:02:18.485
So, having made it to being a kind of middle order batsman CEO, I thought I realized actually what my purpose was.
00:02:19.881 --> 00:02:41.425
I saw around me on my journey that, whatever your background, whatever your job title, however many stars you've got on your lapel, most people seem to resist most change most of the time, and that's what makes you and I in the same business Although, yes, I think we're going to talk about how we come from that from different angles.
00:02:41.625 --> 00:02:55.765
So I decided to dedicate my entire career to helping people endure, enjoy rather than endure um, a life of change that surely lies ahead for all of us, rather than just making rich owners even richer.
00:02:55.765 --> 00:03:09.171
I I thought I could, I could be more useful than that um, and so, while I was still based in new zealand, I I up High Performance Change back in well, 10 years ago now, 2014.
00:03:09.171 --> 00:03:31.612
Got it, and so I do a bit of coaching, a bit of training, and I've developed this model around adaptability, intelligence not a phrase I invented to help people deal with and not just deal with, but actually, you know, thrive on even negative change.
00:03:31.612 --> 00:03:49.689
Because from I believe and I think what I've distilled is that if you can see even negative change as the opportunity to make a positive difference, then you're probably going to have a more productive, more engaging life, and that's kind of where I come from.
00:03:50.771 --> 00:03:51.052
Okay.
00:03:51.052 --> 00:03:59.871
So what is it about change management that the traditional change management approaches that fail?
00:03:59.871 --> 00:04:01.152
What is it?
00:04:01.152 --> 00:04:03.323
Where's its weakness.
00:04:03.463 --> 00:04:04.466
Oh yeah, good question.
00:04:04.466 --> 00:04:07.992
Okay, so I've seen change from most angles.
00:04:07.992 --> 00:04:18.550
Actually, I don't know if any of your viewers are watching this, but I've got a lot of gray hair and I've seen change from most angles.
00:04:18.550 --> 00:04:20.387
I've been a pawn in the game.
00:04:20.387 --> 00:04:21.766
I've been a change manager.
00:04:21.766 --> 00:04:23.720
I've been a project manager.
00:04:23.720 --> 00:04:24.704
I've been a change manager.
00:04:24.704 --> 00:04:25.387
I've been a project manager.
00:04:25.387 --> 00:04:28.319
I've been a sponsor of change.
00:04:28.942 --> 00:04:43.891
When I ask organizations, how do you prepare your people for change which I think is a reasonable question the default answer always comes back, nearly always comes back as we use change management.
00:04:43.891 --> 00:04:56.946
So change management is well proven over the last 30 years to increase the success of projects, because change management focuses on the most difficult bit of projects, which is the people.
00:04:56.946 --> 00:05:06.992
Tickety-tick, all good, except that what you're actually doing is you are treating your most strategic assets tactically.
00:05:06.992 --> 00:05:10.307
You are only preparing them for change when change is needed.
00:05:10.307 --> 00:05:14.947
Wouldn't it be a brilliant idea to prepare them for change before change is needed?
00:05:15.971 --> 00:05:25.853
And that's where developing a more adaptable mindset and disassociating people's personal development around change with a specific change.
00:05:25.853 --> 00:05:51.357
Let's get them open to the idea of change and then, when you throw them into a project, all you've got to convince them of is that this new IT system or product launch or restructuring is actually a good idea, because what people have is a whole load of innate, negative, primal reaction to change which we've evolved over 50,000 years to have as a protection mechanism.
00:05:51.357 --> 00:05:59.112
Let's deal with that separately and it takes time to do that, time that projects never have.
00:05:59.112 --> 00:06:01.406
So projects only skim over.
00:06:01.406 --> 00:06:03.588
They don't change people's attitude to change.
00:06:03.588 --> 00:06:05.548
They're really good at changing what people do.
00:06:05.548 --> 00:06:10.391
They're really not so good at changing people's attitude to change.
00:06:11.180 --> 00:06:48.329
So yeah, I'm all about the long-term and culture change and embedding change in people's thinking and having that kind of adaptable mindset so you're ready for whatever happens next, on the basis that we haven't got a clue what's happening next and can you think of any stories, any illustrations, any kind of real world examples of you know how sort of of the two types really, the um, that obvious reticence to change and then, once the team is kind of prepped for change, and how that changes things?
00:06:49.319 --> 00:06:50.425
Yeah, I can.
00:06:50.961 --> 00:06:53.529
I worked on two very large projects.
00:06:53.680 --> 00:07:18.995
I worked for one of the what was at the time the world's largest pharmaceutical company here in the UK back at the turn of the millennium in the UK back at the turn of the millennium, and we had back then we were trying to hit this thing called Y2K the most immovable, biggest hoax of a deadline that existed, but we didn't know that at the time.
00:07:24.040 --> 00:07:34.091
So we were putting in a new IT system and we basically had to herd people from the old IT system into this new one that was going to be Y2K friendly and it was pretty brutal.
00:07:34.091 --> 00:07:48.615
We tried as hard as we could with the time that we had to help people and coax them, but in the end you end up, as all projects do, they all run out of time and you end up pushing people through that change.
00:07:48.615 --> 00:07:54.351
And that was really my first experience of what got me thinking that perhaps we're not doing this right.
00:07:54.351 --> 00:08:14.870
And then I went on to another massive, even bigger project where we restructured the manufacturing footprint and we took 104 factories down to 72 around the world, and again that was a pretty brutal exercise as well.
00:08:14.870 --> 00:08:17.107
Same for this pharmaceutical company.
00:08:18.244 --> 00:08:23.670
Yeah and that reinforced again what I'd already kind of learned in the previous one.
00:08:23.670 --> 00:08:27.903
So now I understand that it works.
00:08:27.903 --> 00:08:29.464
You can make it happen.
00:08:29.464 --> 00:08:38.528
You can get people from A to B, but they don't then want to go from B to C any more than they wanted to go from A to B.
00:08:39.089 --> 00:08:45.530
So getting people through change doesn't make people love change and it doesn't engage them.
00:08:45.530 --> 00:08:48.544
And what does that do to your productivity, right?
00:08:48.544 --> 00:09:03.423
So clients of mine who've been through the Adaptability Intelligence program, what we do is we talk about things like fear and anxiety, stuff we don't talk about nearly enough at work.
00:09:03.423 --> 00:09:24.159
Well, I think we are doing a lot better as a Western society talking about anxiety these days, which is great, but still we could talk about it more and we really I don't think leaders really understand how much it nobbles your productivity by having people in a state of anxiety.
00:09:24.159 --> 00:09:54.643
By having people in a state of anxiety and I've got data to show that when you do raise people's adaptability intelligence, it increases their levels of innovation, it increases their levels of collaboration, it decreases their fear and anxiety and frees them up so that they are more open to the idea of change and it means that projects happen more quickly and more completely and we've got and we've got some data on that.
00:09:54.643 --> 00:10:00.273
But the most sorry, yeah, no, no, it's well okay.
00:10:00.312 --> 00:10:02.663
I was going to say one.
00:10:02.663 --> 00:10:12.269
You know, there's a couple of ways that I would be anxious if I was an employee of one of these big companies, and one of the principal ones is am I going to have a job?
00:10:12.269 --> 00:10:17.812
Am I going to get fired?
00:10:17.812 --> 00:10:24.052
I don't know how I could prepare for that.
00:10:24.052 --> 00:10:32.746
Don't know if I don't know how I could prepare for that, and is my power structure going to change so that I come off second best?
00:10:32.746 --> 00:10:40.289
Either my boss, who I like, goes away and someone who I don't like comes in, or I lose my power in the organization, like that.
00:10:40.289 --> 00:10:43.662
Those are the things that I, I imagine I would be worried about.
00:10:43.662 --> 00:10:46.009
I've never worked in a large organisation.
00:10:46.009 --> 00:10:49.926
Okay, you know how am I going?
00:10:49.926 --> 00:10:53.307
Are they sort of some of the common fears and anxieties that people have?
00:10:54.711 --> 00:10:55.352
Losing your job.
00:10:55.352 --> 00:11:02.774
So the two extreme examples I always go to is that inside work it's losing your job.
00:11:02.774 --> 00:11:07.003
Outside of work it's losing a loved one to is that inside work it's losing your job.
00:11:07.003 --> 00:11:08.284
Outside of work it's losing a loved one.
00:11:08.284 --> 00:11:14.501
These are two of the biggest, most negative, unwanted, unplanned and unavoidable changes that we all probably go through.
00:11:14.501 --> 00:11:20.832
Um, so if you take that, okay, so what I say to people?
00:11:20.832 --> 00:11:21.955
I can't you know, I'm not.
00:11:21.955 --> 00:11:24.567
I'm, I don't wear a fairy dress.
00:11:24.609 --> 00:11:29.010
Very well, I can't wave my magic wand and keep you in your job.
00:11:29.010 --> 00:11:33.751
What I can do is I can help you deal with the fallout right.
00:11:33.751 --> 00:11:44.726
So it goes something like this when you're sitting in front of your boss and she tells you that you've just lost your job, your primal response your fight and flight.
00:11:44.726 --> 00:11:54.321
You want to punch her on the nose or run screaming from the room right, screaming from the building Back in the day, out in the savannah.
00:11:54.321 --> 00:12:04.486
Those were both very good protective things to do, but if you look in your HR manual, you'll find that they're both disciplinary offenses these days.
00:12:04.486 --> 00:12:17.133
So what you've got to do is learn to control your fear right, and one of the ways that you can learn to control your fear is something we call discovery, which is don't run away from the source of your fear.
00:12:17.133 --> 00:12:18.322
Run towards it.
00:12:18.442 --> 00:12:29.403
Metaphorically, if you're actually down a dark alley, obviously don't take this advice, but what you've got to do is find out everything you can about that situation.
00:12:29.403 --> 00:12:33.331
So, are there any more jobs going in this company?
00:12:33.331 --> 00:12:35.942
If there are, would I be suitable?
00:12:35.942 --> 00:12:39.328
If I'm not, could I be trained?
00:12:39.328 --> 00:12:43.625
And would you wait for me, and would you maybe even pay for that training?
00:12:43.625 --> 00:12:50.087
And if none of those are yes, then would you use your own personal network to help me on my way?
00:12:50.087 --> 00:12:56.851
If you're all these nice placatory words that you're giving me, if you actually mean half of them, would you help me?
00:12:56.851 --> 00:13:05.788
Right, the answer to all of those questions might be no, and you're in no better place than you were when you walked into that, when you were first given that news.
00:13:06.490 --> 00:13:11.111
Right, but what that does is it gives you back your feeling of control.
00:13:11.111 --> 00:13:28.216
What you're afraid of is actually the loss of control, so that you feel persecuted, that you are not now able to protect those who rely on you for protection, to put a roof over their heads, or that your reputation has been damaged.
00:13:28.216 --> 00:13:36.788
You're standing in the community or at work or whatever it is in the modern world that we are afraid of since the saber-toothed tiger disappeared.
00:13:36.788 --> 00:13:49.903
Asking questions and finding out gives you back that sense of control, and you will then know that whatever move you make is likely to be the best move that you can make.
00:13:50.283 --> 00:14:14.827
The problem is that the neuroscience of fear is that your brain actually shuts itself down from thinking, from operating, because all of this big brain that we have here, the neocortex at the front, it comes up with some fantastic ideas and solutions, but they all take too long when you're facing a saber tooth tiger, and it can be the difference between life and lunch.
00:14:14.827 --> 00:14:26.436
So what your amygdala does in your brain the fear center, possibly of your brain is it shuts your brain down and just says, right, let's go straight to action.
00:14:26.436 --> 00:14:39.770
And what discovery does is it fires your brain back up and allows you to get back in control, and that feeling allows you to think clearly and your next move is.
00:14:39.770 --> 00:14:42.020
So I can't stop you being made redundant.
00:14:42.020 --> 00:14:45.668
What I can help you do is make sure that your next move is a good one.
00:14:47.032 --> 00:14:47.734
Got it Okay.
00:14:47.734 --> 00:14:55.932
So that's a nice honest way to look at it, and it reminds me a little bit of the whole kind of the Buddhist mindset.
00:14:55.932 --> 00:15:01.201
Well, I mean, pick any kind of well-established religion, not the.
00:15:01.201 --> 00:15:03.480
You could argue Buddhism is a religion.
00:15:03.480 --> 00:15:12.432
But the whole thing of acceptance basically is to say look, accept the real life as it is and then move forward.
00:15:12.432 --> 00:15:22.094
You know so, uh, and then, like you say, lean into it as opposed to sort of shying away I, I think that's yeah I I.
00:15:22.279 --> 00:15:23.404
You said that about 20 times quicker than I did.
00:15:23.404 --> 00:15:24.529
I wish I'd said I mean that's, that's it, that's.
00:15:24.529 --> 00:15:26.217
Yeah, you said that about 20 times quicker than I did.
00:15:26.217 --> 00:15:26.639
I wish I'd said that.
00:15:26.639 --> 00:15:27.964
I mean, that's it.
00:15:27.964 --> 00:15:29.149
That's it in a nutshell.
00:15:29.149 --> 00:15:29.902
It's about.
00:15:29.902 --> 00:15:33.908
You know, there's a great book it sounds a bit harsh.
00:15:33.908 --> 00:15:36.048
It's called Sumo Shut Up and Move On.
00:15:36.048 --> 00:15:41.687
And what he says in that book is that.
00:15:41.687 --> 00:15:50.940
One of the things that stuck him for me was he says give yourself some hippo time so you're allowed to wallow, so you're not expected to move on immediately.
00:15:50.940 --> 00:15:54.490
Give yourself some wallowing time but then move on.
00:15:54.490 --> 00:15:59.248
And if you keep looking backwards, you know you'll go backwards.
00:16:00.250 --> 00:16:01.552
It's so true and I've done this.
00:16:01.552 --> 00:16:11.091
I'm not sure if you've heard of Vipassana, but it's a 10-day silent retreat and it's related to Buddhism, but it's a technique.
00:16:11.091 --> 00:16:13.645
It's not any kind of belief system or anything like that.
00:16:13.645 --> 00:16:15.791
It's a technique and you go there.
00:16:15.791 --> 00:16:28.143
It's all over the world and I think the Buddha rediscovered it 2,500 years ago, so it's quite an old method and what it involves is body scans.
00:16:28.163 --> 00:16:31.552
So you sit in this for one hour, each meditation is one hour and you're scanning your body.
00:16:31.692 --> 00:16:33.624
So you're reconnecting to your body.
00:16:33.823 --> 00:16:43.610
Essentially, because we spend so much time here up with so much time, you know in our brains, right, and there's a lot of wisdom in our bodies and so right.
00:16:47.100 --> 00:16:50.809
So what this does is reconnect and there's so many things that come out of that.
00:16:50.809 --> 00:17:00.471
But one of the things is to observe, like you were saying, observe feelings and thoughts and sensations in your body and not judge them.
00:17:00.471 --> 00:17:12.490
So if you're feeling anger, you're more inclined to step outside of it and observe yourself being angry, not change it, like, continue to be angry, but just observe that you're being angry.
00:17:12.490 --> 00:17:31.788
Or if you're feeling your gut knotted up because you're anxious about something, it's like let it be knotted up, don't try and change anything, but just observe that, and then also observe that it gently kind of unwinds, because typically when you look at it, when you observe it, typically it starts to behave itself a bit more, you know.
00:17:31.788 --> 00:17:49.634
So that's very interesting how what you've described, that kind of observation of the self, is really really connected to very, very old techniques of some of the wisest people, kind of, in history.
00:17:50.454 --> 00:18:04.980
Yeah, yeah, interesting that research has just come out of Harvard in the last 12 months about fear and our response.
00:18:04.980 --> 00:18:05.542
That basically that they've.
00:18:05.542 --> 00:18:14.650
They've established that the first 90 seconds of you feeling threatened, so fear is your response to a clear and present danger.
00:18:14.650 --> 00:18:29.660
The first 90 seconds you, you, you may not be in control, you know, I, I would say I can help shorten that um, but the first 90 seconds you are running on adrenaline, you, it's a knee-jerk response.
00:18:29.660 --> 00:18:34.006
You're being um managed by your hormones.
00:18:34.045 --> 00:18:47.990
You know adrenaline and cortisol, but beyond 90 seconds, if you so, if you've got rage, if you've got road rage, um, beyond 90 seconds, that is your conscious decision to to carry on.
00:18:47.990 --> 00:18:59.788
You you were talking there about, you know it subsides, there is medical evidence that that is in fact exactly what happens and you, you can learn to control your fear.
00:18:59.788 --> 00:19:06.029
You may not be able to stop feeling the fear, but you can learn to control it, and certainly beyond 90 seconds.
00:19:06.029 --> 00:19:15.664
It's your fault, it's all down to you, that's your decision, so own it, look ownership of these sorts of things is key, isn't it?
00:19:16.807 --> 00:19:21.334
And sort of it sounds like it's a uh, it's a contradiction.
00:19:21.334 --> 00:19:24.323
But ownership, but also lack of judgment.
00:19:24.323 --> 00:19:25.885
So not to judge it.
00:19:25.885 --> 00:19:29.313
Observe it, own it, but don't necessarily judge it.
00:19:29.313 --> 00:19:32.832
I'm feeling the anger or I'm feeling whatever it is.
00:19:32.832 --> 00:19:33.776
Oh, that's interesting.
00:19:33.776 --> 00:19:35.602
It looks like a scientist with a notepad.
00:19:35.602 --> 00:19:38.968
Oh, look at that anger, that Anger Interesting, nodded stomach.
00:19:38.968 --> 00:19:39.970
Oh, that's fascinating.
00:19:39.970 --> 00:19:47.092
You know, and it's mine, it's me, but it's okay, you know, yeah, yeah, no, spot on.
00:19:47.619 --> 00:19:49.326
Well, this is not going well, james.
00:19:49.326 --> 00:19:51.846
We're violently agreeing with each other.
00:19:51.846 --> 00:19:52.807
So far, that's right.
00:19:52.807 --> 00:19:53.830
That wasn't the plan.
00:19:53.830 --> 00:19:54.531
That wasn't the plan.
00:19:55.941 --> 00:19:57.125
No, no, no.
00:19:57.125 --> 00:20:07.368
Well, let's actually change tack to rewards and recognition, because we might find some juicy disagreement there or at least some sparring.
00:20:07.368 --> 00:20:35.148
In our earlier discussion, when you were describing change and that sort of thing, it sounded to me like it was enlisting people to be okay with change and new situations and that sort of stuff to get people to buy into a narrative you know of where the company is headed and that sort of thing.
00:20:35.148 --> 00:20:40.192
Is that roughly where you're coming from with this change management?
00:20:43.324 --> 00:20:45.190
So what I do is not change management.
00:20:45.190 --> 00:20:52.209
Okay, here's what change management does Change management I'm a management consultant, so let's go straight to the iceberg analogy.
00:20:52.209 --> 00:20:55.107
It's written in my contract, right?
00:20:55.107 --> 00:21:03.914
So the tip of the iceberg is all the project managers and change managers have the time and the scope to deal with.
00:21:03.914 --> 00:21:05.707
If they do anything more, it's scope creep.
00:21:06.059 --> 00:21:07.747
You're never going to change people's psyche.
00:21:07.747 --> 00:21:13.131
You're never going to change people, the organizational culture within one project.
00:21:13.131 --> 00:21:14.653
There isn't time, there isn't money.
00:21:14.653 --> 00:21:23.574
All you can do is convince people to be herded from this, this it system to that it system.
00:21:23.574 --> 00:21:25.306
You were doing it this way yesterday.
00:21:25.306 --> 00:21:29.864
Tomorrow you're going to do it that way, um, and if I can get you to do that, I've done my job.
00:21:29.864 --> 00:21:30.505
I'm.
00:21:30.505 --> 00:21:36.407
My job is to get in, change you and get out so I can get onto the next uh project as quickly as possible.
00:21:36.407 --> 00:21:38.213
It's all about efficiency.
00:21:38.213 --> 00:21:41.122
You know the gantt chart, the critical path analysis.
00:21:41.122 --> 00:21:42.724
Let's get through that and out.
00:21:42.766 --> 00:21:46.601
So it's kind of transactional, very, very transactional, right.
00:21:46.601 --> 00:21:54.260
What lies beneath the surface is all of this primal, innate fear and anxiety that we feel about change.
00:21:54.260 --> 00:21:58.753
When we hear the word change, what, how does that make us feel that?
00:21:58.753 --> 00:21:59.015
That?
00:21:59.015 --> 00:22:01.121
That's how you know how adaptable you are.
00:22:01.121 --> 00:22:06.813
When your knee-jerk response to to the word change is oh look, I'm a rock.
00:22:06.813 --> 00:22:08.541
I hear this rich, I'm a rock.
00:22:08.541 --> 00:22:11.346
You've got no chance of ever changing me or.
00:22:11.346 --> 00:22:21.252
I love it, I live for it, I, I I'm bored if I'm doing the same thing more than three seconds in a row, right and all stations in between.
00:22:23.221 --> 00:22:59.938
So what I do is I try and change people's attitude, to change right, so that when… Okay, got it so you go deeper than… yeah, so if people have the confidence, if they have the self-control to deal with their fear, if they have the self-assurance to deal with their anxiety, if they have the self-esteem to know that even negative change is the opportunity to make a positive difference, and if they have the self-actualization to realize that even negative change is a chance for personal growth.
00:22:59.938 --> 00:23:07.782
Sometimes, when the chips are the lowest is when we can bounce the highest and find out not just who we are, but who we could be.
00:23:07.782 --> 00:23:10.789
This is the magic of what change actually is.
00:23:10.789 --> 00:23:21.208
When you can see change in those terms, all of a sudden it becomes much easier to deal with some bloody IT system, However bad it is.
00:23:21.208 --> 00:23:28.787
I know I'm going to be able to not just cope, but come out of this making a difference, being a better person and learning something from it.
00:23:28.787 --> 00:23:31.768
And actually you know I could get.
00:23:32.048 --> 00:23:34.747
You went into Buddhism, so I'm going to get existential.
00:23:34.747 --> 00:23:44.673
Why are we here if not to make a difference on the planet, rather than sit on our hands for as long as we can, avoiding change as much as we can until our pension kicks in?
00:23:44.673 --> 00:23:48.926
If that's the life you lead, you shouldn't be listening to this podcast.
00:23:48.926 --> 00:23:49.949
I don't think Right.
00:23:50.349 --> 00:23:52.673
Yeah, yeah, okay, yeah, yeah.
00:24:01.500 --> 00:24:58.510
Previous discussion we spoke, um, about the kind of the archetypes, different archetypes of people, some of them, some of whom would respond really well to, um, the well, change management at a superficial level and the kind of the attitudinal drivers of that and the behavioral drivers of change management, that sort of thing, right, yep and Yep, and whereas other people they might, and we call them to sort of, maybe to oversimplify this and it might be a bit reductionist, but hear me out, if you wear a hard hat or a hairnet and so if you're sort of working on the coalface and you have these people try and recruit you to a dogma, to a belief system, to some sort of change, and you say I just don't care, it's not up, you know, and what you're really in a psychological sense, you're saying I'm not the archetype that responds well to what you're trying to deliver to me.
00:24:59.240 --> 00:25:01.872
And that's where we had our discussion last time.
00:25:01.872 --> 00:25:02.714
Well, last week, wasn't it?
00:25:02.714 --> 00:25:04.000
Yeah, yeah, absolutely when?
00:25:04.000 --> 00:25:06.809
How do you approach those people?
00:25:06.809 --> 00:25:27.945
And that's what we've been concentrating on, because we're saying, and there's some classic stories I think I forget if I shared this one with you, but of the team that wasn't working well on one job and came across to another job that had this safety incentive program, and did I tell you that story?
00:25:28.640 --> 00:25:29.903
Yeah, but that's right, so it did.
00:25:30.807 --> 00:25:31.430
Well, yeah, okay.
00:25:31.430 --> 00:25:33.748
So there was exactly that.
00:25:33.748 --> 00:25:43.353
In the centre of Sydney, in a construction setting, there was a team that wasn't working well, was notorious, but they were what's called a nominated subcontractor.
00:25:43.353 --> 00:25:53.510
So the client had told the general contractor, the builder, that he had to work with this team and they were notorious.
00:25:55.160 --> 00:26:10.949
Anyway, this general contractor was running this safety incentive program, our safety incentive program called Scratchy, where if somebody does the right thing, they get an instant on-the-spot categorized reward, typically $10, $20, $50 reward.
00:26:10.949 --> 00:26:24.423
And so this team came and the site manager said you don't have to agree to any sort of anything, really, but what I'm saying, you've got to do the right thing.
00:26:24.423 --> 00:26:27.582
And if you don't do the right thing, you know what the consequences are.
00:26:27.582 --> 00:26:44.272
But, on this job, if you do these things, if you keep your area tidy, if I keep seeing you with your hard hats and your personal protective equipment and all that sort of thing, if you do all those things, well then we can give you on the spot, instant cash rewards.
00:26:44.272 --> 00:26:46.559
And this team changed instantly.
00:26:46.921 --> 00:26:58.769
It was the first time that they well, you know, according to DC and Ryan, they were given autonomy to make their own decision.
00:26:58.769 --> 00:27:04.167
And so well, they said actually we like the sound of cash awards.
00:27:04.167 --> 00:27:05.349
We'll do what is it.
00:27:05.349 --> 00:27:08.174
You want those things, we'll do that, no problem.
00:27:08.174 --> 00:27:10.207
And turned them around within hours.
00:27:10.207 --> 00:27:12.301
It wasn't even in days or weeks, it was within hours.
00:27:12.301 --> 00:27:31.711
They were doing as the site manager wanted, and so you know, that's an example of change in inverted commas, or at least behavioural change, right in a very different way, because it's almost.
00:27:31.711 --> 00:27:38.027
It's not expecting them to buy into any of your ideas or your dogma or anything like that.
00:27:38.027 --> 00:27:40.808
It's just saying do these things, you'll get this.
00:27:40.808 --> 00:27:43.105
And they responded really well.
00:27:43.105 --> 00:27:51.355
So I'd love to hear your thoughts on that and how that could be woven into, you know, with a week or so of having, you know, considered it.
00:27:51.915 --> 00:27:52.858
Yeah yeah, how that could be.
00:27:52.858 --> 00:27:58.847
Yeah, yeah, I can see me rocking up with my PowerPoint presentation saying there are four levels of adaptability intelligence.
00:27:59.240 --> 00:28:01.669
Right intelligence, and I'd really like you to Exactly.
00:28:03.421 --> 00:28:05.086
I'm imagining the response I would get.
00:28:05.086 --> 00:28:07.423
Now we did, we did talk.
00:28:07.423 --> 00:28:15.291
My my my go-to motivational thought leader is is Dan Pink.
00:28:15.291 --> 00:28:19.166
You know the guy who wrote Drive the surprising truth about what motivates us.
00:28:19.166 --> 00:28:23.625
And actually you know what guy who wrote Drive the surprising truth about what motivates us.
00:28:23.625 --> 00:28:27.753
And actually you know what Dan said was that incentives do work.
00:28:27.753 --> 00:28:35.933
You know it's about 1% of his entire book because he's saying incentives only work when.
00:28:38.121 --> 00:28:42.991
But that's exactly the situation I think that you're in.
00:28:42.991 --> 00:28:53.214
So what Dan says is that incentives only work when the work is transactional.
00:28:53.214 --> 00:28:56.549
I don't know that he even talks about a type of person.
00:28:56.549 --> 00:29:01.330
My interpretation I could be wrong is that he's really talking about the type of work.
00:29:01.330 --> 00:29:09.131
So, where it is transactional, you wear your hard hat and we will give you this reward.
00:29:10.621 --> 00:29:31.753
What Dan says is that that extrinsic motivation that comes from outside from you, james, actually works, and you didn't need to read his book, although I know you have to know that that works because you see it every time you hand out a card.
00:29:31.753 --> 00:29:46.508
So I think, in terms of for the specific type of work where it is very clear that you have to follow these rules and guidelines on how to be safe on a construction site.
00:29:46.508 --> 00:29:50.737
I think from memory.
00:29:50.737 --> 00:30:07.192
What Pink talks about is that if there is any element of creativity or choice within whatever decisions you get to make on the work that you're doing, incentives in his research tends to fall down.
00:30:07.192 --> 00:30:10.701
But what you're saying is it's pretty black and white.
00:30:10.701 --> 00:30:12.065
You know you've got to.
00:30:12.065 --> 00:30:14.068
Yeah, this is the safe way to operate.
00:30:14.068 --> 00:30:16.862
Yeah, there's really no discussion about it.
00:30:16.862 --> 00:30:19.607
You either do it or you don't, and if you don't, you're out.
00:30:19.607 --> 00:30:22.493
And if you do, then there's a reward in it for you.
00:30:22.493 --> 00:30:32.015
And no surprise then, dan would say, is that your system works gangbusters.
00:30:33.244 --> 00:30:34.200
Yeah, it's interesting.
00:30:34.200 --> 00:30:45.015
So Dan Pink, he popularized a biblical book I think I mentioned last week by DC and Ryan called SDT Self-Determination Theory.
00:30:45.015 --> 00:30:52.747
Yeah, and SDT is based on three needs psychological needs and this is telling you stuff you already know.
00:30:52.747 --> 00:31:01.299
But for the audience, there's the need for autonomy, the need for competence and the need for relatedness the need for autonomy, the need for competence and the need for relatedness.
00:31:01.299 --> 00:31:06.531
And it's funny because I came about, dc and Ryan, after establishing Scratchy in the field.
00:31:07.101 --> 00:31:11.632
So you know, 15 years ago we wanted to win Apple Store.
00:31:11.632 --> 00:31:15.770
Did the Apple Store build in Australia, starting with Sydney?
00:31:15.770 --> 00:31:21.234
I was running a construction company and Apple said show me some safety innovation.
00:31:21.234 --> 00:31:27.541
Starting with Sydney, I was running a construction company and Apple said show me some safety innovation.
00:31:27.541 --> 00:31:30.808
So we rolled this idea out and it was very half-baked and we won the project and we were like, oh no, now we have to actually do it.
00:31:30.808 --> 00:31:32.512
And so we tried it out right.
00:31:32.512 --> 00:31:40.249
So we printed off scratch cards and we gave them to our supervisors and the supervisors would give them to workers when they were doing the right thing.
00:31:40.249 --> 00:31:53.259
So because we had this hunch that we needed to invert the paradigm of safety, which was inherently punitive and it needed to be inverted so that it was inherently encouraging, like the rest of the mammalian kingdom.
00:31:53.381 --> 00:32:00.008
If you want to train any mammal or encourage any mammal to do something, then it's usually better with a carrot than with a stick.
00:32:00.008 --> 00:32:07.729
Try training a child or a dog or a seal or a horse or a dolphin with slaps and see how well you go.
00:32:07.729 --> 00:32:16.373
You know, you train them with treats and encouragement until it becomes intrinsically either habitual or you know whatever.
00:32:16.373 --> 00:32:18.943
And so what?
00:32:18.943 --> 00:32:25.285
Dc and Ryan talk about where there is autonomy, competence and relatedness.
00:32:25.285 --> 00:32:33.368
So if you give someone an award, it's not so much the $10 or the $20 that matters, it's the fact that the supervisor has gone.
00:32:33.368 --> 00:32:37.391
I'm calling you competent in this, that's good.
00:32:38.141 --> 00:32:41.758
And the person has had the autonomy to do this.
00:32:41.758 --> 00:32:43.864
He hasn't been forced, he hasn't been forced down his throat.
00:32:43.864 --> 00:32:45.548
So autonomy gets a tick.
00:32:45.548 --> 00:32:54.842
Competence gets a tick because my supervisor just told me I'm good because of the above definition of giving a reward and then relatedness.
00:32:54.842 --> 00:32:57.144
Well, you know my supervisor.
00:32:57.144 --> 00:33:05.935
I never wanted to look him in the eye because I was always afraid of getting you know, of getting some kind of critical feedback.
00:33:05.935 --> 00:33:12.693
But now, with this encouragement, all of a sudden there's this reconnection between management and worker.
00:33:12.693 --> 00:33:17.207
So it hit me really hard when I read DC and Ryan.
00:33:17.207 --> 00:33:20.993
It was like wait, autonomy, competence, relatedness, all three of them.
00:33:20.993 --> 00:33:30.035
All you need to do is actively encourage the worker and reward them for specific work that gets done.
00:33:30.035 --> 00:33:37.644
And then the question so that was good, that was all great, and you might want to say something to that.
00:33:37.644 --> 00:33:38.346
But I could go on.
00:33:40.855 --> 00:34:02.828
I'd like to ask you a question, which is and I buy into all of that, and who would argue with them and with Pink, yeah, is there a limit to where you can take scratches and this philosophy?
00:34:03.028 --> 00:34:04.131
That's a great question.
00:34:04.315 --> 00:34:07.786
Does it extend beyond transactional work?
00:34:07.786 --> 00:34:16.583
Do you think that you can incentivize everybody with everything for this, or does it have a niche?
00:34:17.514 --> 00:34:19.844
Well, I'll answer that with a question.
00:34:22.295 --> 00:34:23.298
You're a management consultant.
00:34:23.298 --> 00:34:24.844
Right, that's right.
00:34:27.179 --> 00:34:28.463
No, in fact I think it was.
00:34:28.463 --> 00:34:34.887
Kissinger was asked why is it that Jewish men always answer a question with a question?
00:34:34.887 --> 00:34:45.617
And he said what do you mean by that yeah question?
00:34:45.617 --> 00:34:47.242
And you said what do you mean by that?
00:34:47.242 --> 00:34:47.402
Um, yeah.
00:34:47.402 --> 00:34:48.746
So, um, my question to you is you the last time you're in the us?
00:34:48.746 --> 00:34:49.289
Uh, I'm assuming you you've.
00:34:49.289 --> 00:34:51.155
You've traveled, you've well traveled, yeah I was in.
00:34:51.335 --> 00:34:53.099
I was in upstate new york this summer.
00:34:53.119 --> 00:35:01.014
Yes, okay, and you go to a restaurant and, generally speaking, how is the service in restaurants in the US?
00:35:01.014 --> 00:35:02.461
Oh, unbelievably brilliant.
00:35:02.461 --> 00:35:04.501
It's amazing, isn't it?
00:35:04.501 --> 00:35:10.148
And why, would you say, is the big reason?
00:35:10.148 --> 00:35:23.159
Especially if you're someone like Charlie Munger, you would find no surprise, because Charlie Munger has said every time I have guessed the power of an incentive, I've always underestimated its power.
00:35:23.159 --> 00:35:24.161
Right.
00:35:24.161 --> 00:35:31.777
So the power of tipping is magnificent for restaurant culture.
00:35:31.777 --> 00:35:41.757
So it's really proven in a day-to-day example across all restaurants in the US.
00:35:41.757 --> 00:35:43.925
You go there, you're going to get great service.
00:35:43.925 --> 00:35:49.663
You go to some of these other countries with no tipping and you know if they're friendly, then it's hit and miss.
00:35:49.663 --> 00:35:56.268
You can get lucky or not, but it's very rare to find a restaurant with bad service in the States.
00:35:57.916 --> 00:36:06.331
So I would say, to answer your question, what's its limit and at what point is it a sugar high and when you know?
00:36:06.331 --> 00:36:12.903
Because people automatically think, yeah, but I want to do it until I get the outcome and then I want to stop doing it.
00:36:12.903 --> 00:36:14.920
It's like, why stop doing it?
00:36:14.920 --> 00:36:17.965
It's like saying with stop tipping.
00:36:17.965 --> 00:36:24.804
It's like I'm going to tip and to get this change and then I just want to not tip anymore because I want to pocket the money.
00:36:24.804 --> 00:36:26.036
It's like doesn't work like that.
00:36:26.036 --> 00:36:36.278
It's like you will get, um, a magnificent change through this, on the spot, instant rewards, and don't stop doing it and it's fine and that's okay.
00:36:36.278 --> 00:36:36.679
It's not.
00:36:36.679 --> 00:36:38.001
It's not a bug in the system.
00:36:38.001 --> 00:36:38.641
It's fine and that's okay.
00:36:38.641 --> 00:36:39.684
It's not a bug in the system, it's a feature.
00:36:39.684 --> 00:36:42.027
That's what I would say as an answer to that question.
00:36:42.027 --> 00:36:43.469
Right, okay?
00:36:44.490 --> 00:36:44.650
Yeah.
00:36:44.650 --> 00:36:57.023
Do you find that if you stop giving those incentives, does the behaviour go back to what it was?
00:36:57.023 --> 00:37:03.838
Or does it say you said earlier that that you know it becomes intrinsic, it becomes, yeah, habit.
00:37:03.838 --> 00:37:07.005
So at that point do you stop giving the incentives?
00:37:07.005 --> 00:37:18.742
Or do you find that if you, if any of your clients have, have stopped the program, does the thing go into reverse, or is this permanent behavior change?
00:37:19.423 --> 00:37:45.204
yeah, I I really think that people saying what happens when I remove it are thinking the wrong way about this, because what we've proven is that and I'm not accusing you of anything you're throwing questions around and you're putting that as a very commonly put question to us, whether it might be someone asking you or whatever it might be.
00:37:45.204 --> 00:38:00.989
And the reason why I say it's not thinking about the right way is if something is proven to be highly effective, why would you want to not do it anymore?
00:38:00.989 --> 00:38:15.487
So right, so, and that's what we've found is that every time someone starts to again with a Charlie Munger kind of attitude, you know, okay, let's go the other way around.
00:38:15.487 --> 00:38:20.523
Senior management in Glaxo, or you know one of these big pharmaceutical companies.
00:38:20.563 --> 00:38:20.744
Yep.
00:38:22.315 --> 00:38:24.063
They are incentivised.
00:38:24.063 --> 00:38:29.007
They receive bonuses on a strategic level because they do a strategic job.
00:38:29.007 --> 00:38:37.945
So if your firm meets these strategic goals, then you will get a big fat bonus.
00:38:37.945 --> 00:38:42.356
And guess who's incentivized to make those things happen?
00:38:42.356 --> 00:38:53.106
And so you know that's very common across all of the capitalist world is that if the senior leaders achieve goals, then they get a bonus.
00:38:53.106 --> 00:39:02.447
Now the question that the shareholders don't ask is okay, but next year I want to not do a bonus, but I still want to get that outcome.
00:39:02.447 --> 00:39:04.322
It just doesn't work like that, right.
00:39:04.322 --> 00:39:07.702
And so what I'm suggesting?
00:39:07.702 --> 00:39:17.516
With something like Scratchy or any kind of I just don't know of any instant categorised rewards for the people wearing hard hats and hairnets.
00:39:17.516 --> 00:39:20.043
So I'll just call it scratchy, because there's nothing else that.
00:39:20.063 --> 00:39:24.603
I've seen Right Is what's that doing?
00:39:24.603 --> 00:39:26.842
What that does is exactly the same.
00:39:26.842 --> 00:39:27.605
It's a fractal.
00:39:27.605 --> 00:39:34.324
What it does is exactly the same, but on a micro level for a highly tactical job.
00:39:34.324 --> 00:39:36.980
So you do this task well.
00:39:36.980 --> 00:39:39.726
That actually lines up with our strategy down.
00:39:39.726 --> 00:39:49.025
But you don't need to know that you do these behaviors, these tasks well and you'll get a reward and they go cool, okay, excellent, because I'm not here.
00:39:49.025 --> 00:39:53.226
I mean, I might be here for love, but I'm also here for money, you know.
00:39:53.226 --> 00:39:57.557
So yeah, yeah, so that's.
00:39:59.900 --> 00:40:00.724
I absolutely get it.
00:40:00.724 --> 00:40:07.340
I've been on the shop floor, you know, back in the 90s when suggestion schemes were.
00:40:07.340 --> 00:40:15.427
They were maybe a bit, you know, more flavor of the day than they are these days.
00:40:15.427 --> 00:40:36.914
But actually I've got a story when I was working one of my first jobs and I was working in a on a shampoo bottle bottling line, um, and the the incentive scheme was if you get, if you come up with a uh, an idea, um, then you'll get 20 of the first year savings.
00:40:36.914 --> 00:40:38.980
I mean, this was this.
00:40:39.541 --> 00:40:44.304
I'm kind of arguing with myself now because this is going into having a creative thought.
00:40:44.304 --> 00:40:48.065
This isn't just a transactional thing.
00:40:48.065 --> 00:41:09.887
And this lady on the line who could have come in and turned her brain off for eight hours a day, she figured out that rather than having a vacuum-formed tray to stand all these very tall, high center of gravity bottles that kept falling over on the line, so they put them in a vacuum-formed tray before they went into the shrink wrapper.
00:41:09.887 --> 00:41:13.865
She said, well, why don't we replace that with an elastic band?
00:41:13.865 --> 00:41:18.244
And she got a check with a whole bunch of zeros on the end.
00:41:18.934 --> 00:41:20.422
What a brilliant story.
00:41:20.715 --> 00:41:24.538
That's exactly it's such a good story and why wouldn't?
00:41:24.538 --> 00:41:29.965
As a leader you know, sitting on your big fat strategic bonus every year.
00:41:29.965 --> 00:41:32.222
Why would you ever want to stop that?
00:41:33.135 --> 00:41:34.581
Oh mate, what a story.
00:41:34.581 --> 00:41:47.847
That's what I'm talking about, because this woman is seeing these bottles go past 500 times an hour or whatever it is, and, like you say, her brain, she can be thinking about whatever she likes.
00:41:47.847 --> 00:41:49.782
She's got the autonomy to do that.
00:41:49.782 --> 00:41:56.340
And someone said to her apply your brain to this line and you'll get something from it.
00:41:56.340 --> 00:41:57.103
Well, guess what?
00:41:57.103 --> 00:41:59.222
It's amazing, yeah, yeah.
00:42:00.237 --> 00:42:04.347
And of course, the other thing was from a manual handling point of view.
00:42:04.347 --> 00:42:08.425
She's got to lift those bottles into the vacuum form tray.
00:42:08.425 --> 00:42:15.284
So over the course of an eight-hour shift, you know, she's probably lifting what the world's strongest man has to deal with.
00:42:15.284 --> 00:42:22.344
Yeah, and now, all of a sudden, all she has to do is gather them together on the belt and put a band around them.
00:42:22.344 --> 00:42:24.838
So good.
00:42:25.219 --> 00:42:25.960
So good.
00:42:26.802 --> 00:42:33.621
Yeah, okay, what I'm still thinking, though.
00:42:33.621 --> 00:42:44.947
So hopefully that proves to you that I absolutely get what you do and I back you 100%, and I'm sure Dan Pink and Desi and Ryan would as well.
00:42:44.947 --> 00:42:49.184
How do you think this could be applied?
00:42:49.184 --> 00:42:53.786
Do you think this could be applied to we're going to put in a new IT system?
00:42:53.786 --> 00:43:02.226
That's always my go-to example because it's the one that upsets people the most, because for most people, including myself, I can't even spell IT.
00:43:02.226 --> 00:43:06.324
For most people, it is kind of here be dragons.
00:43:06.324 --> 00:43:12.684
We don't really know what goes on with IT and it's a big unknown and it causes a lot of fear and anxiety.
00:43:12.684 --> 00:43:21.168
Could you apply Scratchies to help motivate people to adopt a new IT system?
00:43:22.009 --> 00:43:22.550
Interesting.
00:43:22.550 --> 00:43:25.905
You beat me to the question, oh, brilliant.
00:43:25.905 --> 00:43:28.280
Because I'm not sure I could answer it.
00:43:28.280 --> 00:43:29.519
That's why I'm asking it.
00:43:30.121 --> 00:43:30.402
Yeah.
00:43:31.195 --> 00:43:38.268
Well, I guess again I'll sort of answer the question with a question.
00:43:38.268 --> 00:43:42.554
Mike, again I'll sort of answer the question with a question.
00:43:42.554 --> 00:43:47.775
Are there specific behaviours that are important to the success of that project?
00:43:47.775 --> 00:43:51.702
And the example I have is in.
00:43:51.702 --> 00:43:54.547
So let's say, mcdonald's is a client of ours.
00:43:54.547 --> 00:43:59.927
What's important to McDonald's is clean as you go.
00:43:59.927 --> 00:44:16.985
So clean as you go is a concept that they keep encouraging and they keep reminding, and it's sort of like it borders on nagging, because they're always telling these 16-year-olds to clean as you go and so you can keep telling them that and that's fine.
00:44:16.985 --> 00:44:25.565
But every now and then, if you see one of your crew cleaning as they go, you say Joe, that's exactly what I'm talking about.
00:44:25.565 --> 00:44:27.139
Come over here, you legend.
00:44:27.139 --> 00:44:29.903
Or Joe's not allowed to have his phone on our shift.
00:44:29.903 --> 00:44:33.105
So, joe, what I'm giving you is a remote award.
00:44:33.105 --> 00:44:37.476
By the end of your shift, you go to your phone, you're going to have a scratch, you're going to have a reward.
00:44:37.476 --> 00:44:38.838
Joe goes, awesome.
00:44:38.838 --> 00:44:46.686
And the other crew say I want some of that, I want to do that Now.
00:44:46.686 --> 00:44:49.509
So that's clean as you go.
00:44:49.668 --> 00:44:51.771
In construction, obviously it's safety.
00:44:51.771 --> 00:45:00.456
But one example is they were building a data centre, inney, and they needed the contractors to use a particular car park.
00:45:00.456 --> 00:45:14.228
And so the leadership site leadership said all right, guys, um, anyone who uses the car park gets an entry into the scratchy each day and it's a hundred dollars to be won every day.
00:45:14.228 --> 00:45:16.657
So shifted everyone's behavior.
00:45:16.657 --> 00:45:19.202
So everyone, everyone went to use the car park.
00:45:19.202 --> 00:45:24.889
So it was that he used that in kind of a way that we'd never imagined.
00:45:24.889 --> 00:45:40.387
So my question is are there certain behaviors and typically they're kind of mundane but important behaviors that you wish the people doing this project would do more of?
00:45:40.387 --> 00:45:57.626
And if there are, and there always are then there is a room for instant categorised rewards and it will affect the behaviour and the performance of the very people whose performance this success relies upon.
00:45:58.969 --> 00:45:59.230
Okay.
00:45:59.230 --> 00:46:14.905
So I think the positive here is that if you take an IT system right, somebody's doing four transactions within that new IT system that they're booking goods in or something.
00:46:14.905 --> 00:46:29.545
You could say that's a transaction and you were doing it this way on the old system and we're going to train you up in the new standard operating procedure which will be handled by this new IT system.
00:46:29.545 --> 00:46:42.838
So we're going to change the process and then we're going to put a new IT system in that mimics that process system, in that that that copy that mimics that process.
00:46:42.838 --> 00:46:51.757
Um, you could say that that's, that's transactional and that every time you use that transaction uh, you know that then then you'll be entered into the scratchy.
00:46:51.757 --> 00:46:57.697
You don't have the autonomy because it's you know you, you have to use it.
00:46:57.697 --> 00:47:04.583
So people aren't used, people don't have that freedom that you would have in choosing which car park to use.
00:47:04.583 --> 00:47:10.523
So I don't know if it would tick that box, but it is transactional, so it might.
00:47:13.356 --> 00:47:34.804
The problem is you've got to get them open to the idea of learning that new SOP, which they will be resistant to, and then the project will suffer the inertia that all projects suffer, and that's one of the big problems I've got and maybe you can solve it.
00:47:34.804 --> 00:47:39.521
Maybe you can't in total, you certainly can in part.
00:47:39.521 --> 00:47:40.244
I know that.
00:47:40.244 --> 00:47:47.561
But what I found is, however many projects that people go through, everybody seems to have.
00:47:47.561 --> 00:48:03.643
All projects seem to have the same amount of inertia every time, and it's the same people being forced through these projects, which means that people aren't becoming more open to change just because they've been through the experience of going through change.
00:48:03.643 --> 00:48:17.771
In fact, if change is handled badly and a lot of the time it is people become less open to the idea of change than they were before.
00:48:17.771 --> 00:48:19.338
That's getting off the point.
00:48:19.360 --> 00:48:20.764
Open to the idea of change than they were before.
00:48:20.764 --> 00:48:21.447
That's getting off the point.
00:48:21.447 --> 00:48:22.271
Well, you mentioned SOP.
00:48:22.271 --> 00:48:22.994
Can we go to that?
00:48:22.994 --> 00:48:28.907
Yeah sure, is learning new SOPs a big part of an IT process?
00:48:28.907 --> 00:48:30.418
Is that something that?
00:48:30.418 --> 00:48:41.085
That sounds to me something like that is a bit of it's difficult to get people to do, but is very important to the outcome of the process.
00:48:41.637 --> 00:48:44.244
And that's why I bring it up, because it is fairly structured.
00:48:44.244 --> 00:48:46.864
It's very structured and it is transactional.
00:48:46.864 --> 00:48:52.148
So normally two things happen when you go from an old IT system to a new one.
00:48:52.148 --> 00:48:54.824
The first is you actually fix the process.
00:48:54.824 --> 00:49:01.547
They always say don't automate your problems, because then you'll just do them wronger quicker.
00:49:01.927 --> 00:49:06.182
Yeah, right, so whatever's going on, have you seen Elon's steps to that, the five steps?
00:49:06.664 --> 00:49:06.844
No.
00:49:08.235 --> 00:49:09.721
As you're talking, I'll find it.
00:49:09.721 --> 00:49:13.364
It's so good, anyway, carry on, yeah, okay.
00:49:13.474 --> 00:49:19.141
So what you do is you fix the process first of all and you make that right, and then you automate it.
00:49:19.141 --> 00:49:23.860
Yes, the process first of all, and you make that right, and then you automate it, yes, and put it into the news.
00:49:23.860 --> 00:49:24.822
So you might have two, two parts to your sop.
00:49:24.822 --> 00:49:30.722
One is this is how the goods are going to be booked in, and then, yes, on this computer system.
00:49:30.722 --> 00:49:38.043
This is how that transaction actually works, and these are the buttons that you need to press in order to make that transaction happen.
00:49:39.025 --> 00:49:39.327
Okay.
00:49:39.327 --> 00:49:45.072
So for that what you could do is a kind of a duolingo approach to the SOP.
00:49:45.072 --> 00:49:50.047
So let's say there's a dozen SOPs that people need to learn.
00:49:50.047 --> 00:49:53.403
For every SOP that you do, you get points.
00:49:53.403 --> 00:50:00.485
And for every little quiz that you do, at the end of it you get points and you get a randomized award.
00:50:00.875 --> 00:50:03.804
So every third SOP or something you get a scratchy.
00:50:03.804 --> 00:50:08.664
So it's unknown, you're not doing it particularly for the scratchy, because you don't know.
00:50:08.664 --> 00:50:09.847
There's this anticipation.
00:50:09.847 --> 00:50:16.063
You don't know when you're going to get a scratchy, but you know that the more SOPs you do, the bigger chance you have of getting a scratchy.
00:50:16.063 --> 00:50:26.284
And then, once every week, you can say here's the leaderboard of all the SOPs that have been done this week and we're going to draw out of a hat.
00:50:26.284 --> 00:50:32.938
The more SOPs that you've done, the higher your chances of getting the grand prize, which might be $500 or something like that.
00:50:32.938 --> 00:50:35.943
And so, or it could be $200.
00:50:35.943 --> 00:50:37.456
You've got to contextualise it, yep, right.
00:50:37.456 --> 00:50:38.336
Or it could be $200.
00:50:38.336 --> 00:50:39.217
You've got to contextualize it, yep, right.
00:50:39.478 --> 00:50:46.985
And then, so these people that have SOPs were a boring, you know, dragging my heels to do it.
00:50:46.985 --> 00:50:48.086
Now it's a.
00:50:48.086 --> 00:50:49.168
How do I play the game?
00:50:49.168 --> 00:50:50.789
How do I get on top of the leaderboard?
00:50:50.789 --> 00:50:52.592
You know that sort of thing.
00:50:52.592 --> 00:51:06.206
So that's an example of a behavior that's necessary but it's really hard to sell and people have only ever applied the stick to it, but now it's applying the carrot and so people get g'd up.
00:51:06.206 --> 00:51:10.235
They say, of course, I'll give it my attention, I was going to watch tv tonight but I'm going to do a couple of sops.
00:51:10.235 --> 00:51:13.826
It's the same deal um with uh, with duolingo.
00:51:13.826 --> 00:51:19.438
It's why it's the world's biggest uh language trainer is because they've just simply gamified language learning.
00:51:19.438 --> 00:51:26.728
Language learning is really hard, as you know, and they've proven that gamification can really motivate almost anyone to do anything.
00:51:27.630 --> 00:51:28.471
Yes, yeah.
00:51:29.815 --> 00:51:34.646
Now can I give you Elon's five-step process for building great products.
00:51:34.646 --> 00:51:35.347
I love it.
00:51:35.347 --> 00:51:39.184
Number one make your requirements less dumb.
00:51:39.184 --> 00:51:44.786
According to Elon, your requirements are definitely dumb, it doesn't matter who gave them to you.
00:51:44.786 --> 00:51:48.318
So iterate on your project requirements before starting.
00:51:48.318 --> 00:51:50.123
Make them clearer, simpler and more specific.
00:51:50.123 --> 00:51:52.297
So that's number one Make your requirements less dumb.
00:51:52.297 --> 00:51:56.987
Number two try very hard to delete the part or process.
00:51:56.987 --> 00:52:00.976
So if you're not occasionally adding things back in, you're not deleting enough.
00:52:00.976 --> 00:52:08.240
Try everything you can think of to get rid of the part or process before even starting, and you'll end up with a streamlined end product.
00:52:08.240 --> 00:52:11.228
Number three out of five simplify.
00:52:11.228 --> 00:52:15.365
So once you've done steps one and two, you know that you actually need to build the thing.
00:52:15.365 --> 00:52:17.559
So now make it as simple as possible.
00:52:18.943 --> 00:52:22.878
The most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist.
00:52:22.878 --> 00:52:28.528
Number four accelerate cycle time.
00:52:28.528 --> 00:52:31.240
So work with urgency and move fast.
00:52:31.240 --> 00:52:33.706
Design, build, test, iterate, keep moving faster.
00:52:33.706 --> 00:52:38.692
Elon says that no matter how fast you think you're going, you're moving too slowly.
00:52:38.692 --> 00:52:39.355
Move faster.
00:52:39.355 --> 00:52:41.119
Um, elon says that no matter how fast you think you're going, you're moving too slowly.
00:52:41.119 --> 00:52:41.358
Move faster.
00:52:41.358 --> 00:52:43.063
Uh, the the caveat there is if you're digging your grave.
00:52:43.063 --> 00:52:45.356
Don't dig faster, just stop digging your grave.
00:52:45.356 --> 00:52:48.864
And then finally, in the five-step process, is automate.
00:52:48.864 --> 00:52:55.510
So only now that you've built the thing, um, now you can make production repeatable and scalable on that sort of thing, right?
00:52:55.510 --> 00:52:57.920
So I thought that might be worth sharing.
00:52:57.920 --> 00:53:01.836
It's a beautiful five step from the genius of our kind of era.
00:53:02.217 --> 00:53:04.740
So yeah, yeah, that's very good.
00:53:04.740 --> 00:53:09.467
Um, yeah, when it comes to um.
00:53:09.467 --> 00:53:12.137
So, look, I, I buy that, I I buy that.
00:53:12.137 --> 00:53:33.545
And there I think what you've demonstrated is that there is definitely room within something as big and creative as an IT implementation, which maybe a lot of leaders listening to this would be nodding their head saying, yep, this is a problem I've had to deal with and maybe Scratches is part of the answer to that.
00:53:34.034 --> 00:53:38.298
I absolutely buy your argument on that, absolutely buy your argument on that.
00:53:38.298 --> 00:53:47.806
If you look slightly beyond the transactional, you know I've redefined adaptability.
00:53:47.806 --> 00:53:59.434
If you look it up in the dictionary, it says the ability to adjust to new conditions, which is, you know, absolutely right, a little bit dry and almost entirely useless at helping us understand what it is to be adaptable.
00:53:59.434 --> 00:54:22.226
So we've redefined that as having the curiosity to see the need or opportunity for change, to scour your external environment, to see what's coming and what's possible, the courage to actually make change happen, because it's easy to be a spectator and to know what to do, but you need courage to actually make it happen.
00:54:22.875 --> 00:54:30.280
Courage is underrated and something Elon just mentioned there, the velocity to turn quickly in the right direction.
00:54:30.280 --> 00:54:31.264
Yeah, yeah.
00:54:31.264 --> 00:54:49.329
And so those things you know they come from the head and the heart and the hands, and where is the transactional nature of your reward system?
00:54:49.329 --> 00:54:53.284
How is that going to encourage me to be curious?
00:54:53.284 --> 00:55:01.905
And how would you reward curiosity if you think that's, you know, something worth having and exhibiting in your employees?
00:55:01.925 --> 00:55:05.684
Yeah, I would encourage not to call it transactional.
00:55:05.684 --> 00:55:12.509
I would say it's as transactional as getting paid to do work is transactional.
00:55:12.509 --> 00:55:18.972
So, you know, transactional is also giving a service person like a waiter in the New York restaurant a tip is transactional.
00:55:18.972 --> 00:55:24.246
It giving a service person like a waiter in the New York restaurant a tip is transactional, it doesn't matter.
00:55:24.246 --> 00:55:33.445
You know, receiving the CEO receiving a bonus for the strategic win of his company is transactional.
00:55:33.445 --> 00:55:36.114
So I don't think transactional matters.
00:55:36.114 --> 00:55:42.800
It's you know, it's all about we want this particular behaviour to be done.
00:55:43.155 --> 00:55:48.282
We are all working in competing priorities, we've all got different things going on.
00:55:48.282 --> 00:56:00.039
And your example of that woman on the line who found a more efficient way because the reward steered her thinking towards it, to say, okay, I'll give it some thinking time, because that's what now?
00:56:00.039 --> 00:56:02.324
I know they've been clear to me with what they want.
00:56:02.324 --> 00:56:03.768
They've asked me for my input.
00:56:03.768 --> 00:56:04.878
But not only that.
00:56:04.878 --> 00:56:08.306
They said they're going to reward me if I come up with a good idea.
00:56:08.394 --> 00:56:15.599
There's two things there, and that's the same thing with giving instant on the spot rewards for certain kind of mundane tasks.
00:56:15.599 --> 00:56:20.009
They're making it the management making it really clear what they want.
00:56:20.009 --> 00:56:25.320
And then they're saying and if you do it, then you know we'll recognise you for it.
00:56:25.320 --> 00:56:28.525
Our walk is going to meet our talk, you know.
00:56:28.525 --> 00:56:31.264
So what we do is going to meet what we say.
00:56:31.264 --> 00:56:38.418
It's not just going to be posters on the wall, it's going to be no, if you do it, we're going to recognise you and reward you for that.
00:56:38.418 --> 00:56:44.541
So it kind of lines up everyone, yeah, okay, well, rich, we're getting close.
00:56:44.541 --> 00:56:45.463
It's been an hour.
00:56:46.277 --> 00:56:47.079
We've run out of time.
00:56:47.079 --> 00:56:50.494
I know We'll have to have a part two, we will.
00:56:50.775 --> 00:56:53.184
It's been such an interesting discussion.
00:56:53.184 --> 00:56:57.545
I really enjoyed it, me too.
00:56:57.545 --> 00:57:00.340
I'm going to try and uh summarize it.
00:57:00.340 --> 00:57:11.534
Um, we sort of um started with um with what, what, your background, and then we spoke about uh kind of um, well, the iceberg.
00:57:11.534 --> 00:57:13.016
You brought out the iceberg metaphor.
00:57:13.016 --> 00:57:19.646
I think it took uh 17 minutes for that to come out, so yeah proud moment, um.
00:57:20.327 --> 00:57:31.309
So yeah, tip of the iceberg being um being this kind of change management, but underneath it, the really important drives being attitude and behavior and beliefs and all those sorts of things, and that's what you really affect.
00:57:31.309 --> 00:57:43.170
And then we spoke about how um scratchy, or at least how on the spot, instant rewards can affect change, and can affect actually more than change, you know, sort of deeper than that.
00:57:43.170 --> 00:57:46.204
Anyway, it's been a great discussion.
00:57:46.204 --> 00:57:50.422
I really thank you for your time and, like you say, you can always follow it up.
00:57:50.594 --> 00:57:53.280
It has been fantastic, very thought-provoking for me.
00:57:53.280 --> 00:57:54.844
Yeah, great.
00:57:55.414 --> 00:57:57.605
Okay, well, I'll leave it at that and I look forward to meeting you in person at some point.
00:57:57.605 --> 00:58:00.757
Yeah, I'll leave it at that and I look forward to meeting you in person at some point.
00:58:00.757 --> 00:58:05.085
Yeah, that would be great, excellent, okay, thank you, rich.
00:58:05.085 --> 00:58:06.487
Thanks, james.