WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:04.320
Welcome to The Quietly Ambitious Analyst, a podcast about data,
2
00:00:04.360 --> 00:00:08.119
communication and business. I'm Seth Forbes, and in each episode
3
00:00:08.240 --> 00:00:12.400
will unpack what it really takes to influence decisions with data,
4
00:00:12.439 --> 00:00:17.160
from framing business problems to communicating insights with confidence. Because
5
00:00:17.239 --> 00:00:27.839
data alone doesn't drive change, people do. Welcome back everyone
6
00:00:27.920 --> 00:00:32.479
to another episode of The Quietly Ambitious Analyst podcast. Today
7
00:00:32.600 --> 00:00:35.920
we have Aaron Wilkerson who has over eighteen years of
8
00:00:35.960 --> 00:00:40.280
experience in data and analytics. He specializes in building and
9
00:00:40.359 --> 00:00:44.320
driving data strategies that help companies leverage their data assets.
10
00:00:44.840 --> 00:00:48.240
Aaron lives in Livonia, Michigan, with his wife and their
11
00:00:48.280 --> 00:00:51.479
five children. So Erin, thank you so much for joining
12
00:00:51.520 --> 00:00:53.560
the podcast. It's a pleasure to have you here today.
13
00:00:54.000 --> 00:00:55.719
Absolutely, thank you, Seth for having me.
14
00:00:56.240 --> 00:00:59.320
I would love to kind of get into your own,
15
00:00:59.520 --> 00:01:02.560
I guess career journey and kind of reflecting on what
16
00:01:02.600 --> 00:01:06.239
you've learned over the years. What is the driving force
17
00:01:06.359 --> 00:01:08.519
for you as a data professional.
18
00:01:09.359 --> 00:01:13.680
I think it's just a natural curiosity, always looking to
19
00:01:14.280 --> 00:01:17.000
problem solve and figure things out. And so that's what
20
00:01:17.239 --> 00:01:19.040
things I do like about our field is we do
21
00:01:19.519 --> 00:01:23.079
work across many different business functions. There's also interesting problems
22
00:01:23.079 --> 00:01:27.079
because new technology stacks, you have, different stakeholders come in
23
00:01:27.079 --> 00:01:32.120
into play. There's always new and latest tools. So at
24
00:01:32.120 --> 00:01:34.079
one point cloud was a big thing, you know, almost
25
00:01:34.120 --> 00:01:37.439
twenty years ago, and then you got data minorization with
26
00:01:37.519 --> 00:01:39.359
lake House and data bricks and all that, and now
27
00:01:39.400 --> 00:01:39.959
you have AI.
28
00:01:40.760 --> 00:01:42.599
So I'll say there's.
29
00:01:42.439 --> 00:01:44.959
Never a dull moment, and everything changes, but it's always
30
00:01:45.000 --> 00:01:48.920
interesting problems to solve and service to the business, you know,
31
00:01:49.079 --> 00:01:52.680
just always trying to give them interesting, interesting things that
32
00:01:52.680 --> 00:01:56.519
they need to make decisions and figure out the best
33
00:01:56.519 --> 00:01:57.760
course of action for the business.
34
00:01:57.799 --> 00:02:00.719
So I love that you're saying curiosity is driving factor.
35
00:02:00.879 --> 00:02:03.599
I am also curious when you were a kid, were
36
00:02:03.640 --> 00:02:07.280
there any traits that you kind of look back now
37
00:02:07.359 --> 00:02:09.439
and you're like, oh, that makes sense now that I'm
38
00:02:09.479 --> 00:02:09.840
in data.
39
00:02:11.639 --> 00:02:15.479
Yeah, probably analytical thinking, you know, like taking things apart.
40
00:02:15.800 --> 00:02:20.159
We're curious about curiosity about how things work, and you know,
41
00:02:20.159 --> 00:02:23.159
trying to figure out things, you know, taking taking apart
42
00:02:23.439 --> 00:02:27.199
toys and remote controls and things like that, just natural curiosity.
43
00:02:27.199 --> 00:02:29.400
Because I do think that this is a field.
44
00:02:29.120 --> 00:02:33.879
Where there are no kind of right answers, is very
45
00:02:33.919 --> 00:02:37.120
kind of solution driven. Analytical there's no set step of
46
00:02:37.159 --> 00:02:39.080
go like from step as that B. There are some
47
00:02:39.520 --> 00:02:41.280
things you need to figure out, especially with leadership, like
48
00:02:41.319 --> 00:02:43.960
as I've taken on leadership the past ten years. That's
49
00:02:44.080 --> 00:02:47.599
it's a whole entirely different new challenge. But I think
50
00:02:47.680 --> 00:02:53.400
kind of kind of that like curiosity, ethical thinking, problem solving.
51
00:02:54.639 --> 00:02:57.000
You know, I really like math. I was good at math.
52
00:02:57.039 --> 00:02:59.599
You know, math has kind of natural stepping points around
53
00:02:59.639 --> 00:03:02.000
how to use all problems on how do you figure
54
00:03:02.039 --> 00:03:06.000
things out? Yes, I mean like data was kind of
55
00:03:06.039 --> 00:03:07.479
a career I just kind of fell upon. It wasn't
56
00:03:07.479 --> 00:03:09.879
like a childhood dream of you know, becoming you know,
57
00:03:10.080 --> 00:03:11.520
a data leader, like I think at that point I
58
00:03:11.520 --> 00:03:13.719
didn't even know what data was, whereas most people didn't
59
00:03:13.759 --> 00:03:15.800
know what that was. So I think it just kind
60
00:03:15.800 --> 00:03:18.879
of just curiosity and just gotten lucky getting into this
61
00:03:18.919 --> 00:03:20.560
field of being they able to stay for so long.
62
00:03:21.360 --> 00:03:23.919
You were saying that in data, there's really no such
63
00:03:24.000 --> 00:03:25.280
thing as a right answer.
64
00:03:25.400 --> 00:03:27.479
Can would you mind expanding on that a little bit more?
65
00:03:29.599 --> 00:03:30.360
Yeah, it's.
66
00:03:31.919 --> 00:03:35.120
Because it kind of all depends on the context of.
67
00:03:36.759 --> 00:03:39.759
What you're trying to do. So if someone says to.
68
00:03:39.719 --> 00:03:42.400
You, you know, I'm like we were inundated with tools
69
00:03:42.840 --> 00:03:45.280
and that you know in our in the work that
70
00:03:45.280 --> 00:03:47.560
we do. So it's kind of like these things could work.
71
00:03:47.599 --> 00:03:49.240
So it's kind of like does it work for your business?
72
00:03:49.240 --> 00:03:52.240
You know, you always have budget constraints, you know, a leader,
73
00:03:52.280 --> 00:03:55.159
you have team composition, like if you have an account,
74
00:03:55.199 --> 00:03:56.639
what do you do with that? From a team, like
75
00:03:56.639 --> 00:03:59.319
what's the best use of resources for the company. So
76
00:03:59.400 --> 00:04:02.120
it's it's like trying to figure out approach and selling
77
00:04:02.120 --> 00:04:04.319
people on that approach of Hey, this is what we built.
78
00:04:04.360 --> 00:04:07.360
And you know, there's different data models, like there's a
79
00:04:07.439 --> 00:04:10.000
data you can do, a relational data model, there's dimensional
80
00:04:10.080 --> 00:04:12.560
data models. There's graphs that we have too, So how
81
00:04:12.560 --> 00:04:15.080
do you and choose that? So there's there's a lot
82
00:04:15.080 --> 00:04:17.680
of different choices. There's no set like this is the
83
00:04:17.720 --> 00:04:21.040
one way to do it. There's variability and different different
84
00:04:21.079 --> 00:04:24.160
ways to come to a solution and having to stand
85
00:04:24.160 --> 00:04:25.600
by that and say I think this is the best
86
00:04:25.680 --> 00:04:26.240
course of action.
87
00:04:27.000 --> 00:04:28.920
You know, that makes a lot of sense and I
88
00:04:28.959 --> 00:04:30.279
have experienced that as well.
89
00:04:30.480 --> 00:04:31.759
Just being a data analyst.
90
00:04:31.839 --> 00:04:34.839
One analyst could find an insight that is slightly different
91
00:04:34.959 --> 00:04:37.600
from an insight that another data analyst may find if
92
00:04:37.600 --> 00:04:40.800
they're looking at the same data set, or what stands
93
00:04:40.800 --> 00:04:43.480
out to one person may look different for another. And
94
00:04:43.519 --> 00:04:45.920
then on top of that, like structuring the story and
95
00:04:45.920 --> 00:04:48.399
the way that you present it to stakeholders, you know,
96
00:04:48.560 --> 00:04:51.720
could be variable depending on who it is that you're
97
00:04:51.720 --> 00:04:53.399
working with and what they care about.
98
00:04:54.680 --> 00:05:00.680
Yes, exactly, especially open into questions like you know, what's
99
00:05:00.720 --> 00:05:03.399
the reason this happened or why did this happen? Or
100
00:05:03.439 --> 00:05:07.160
what do we think's going to happen? Or what would
101
00:05:07.240 --> 00:05:12.160
you recommend? Like those are all those open ended questions
102
00:05:12.199 --> 00:05:14.839
that make you challenge. Especially when you're young your career,
103
00:05:14.839 --> 00:05:18.720
you kind of you challenge yourself like okay, well what's
104
00:05:18.720 --> 00:05:21.439
the best I don't know? Or who can I ask?
105
00:05:21.560 --> 00:05:23.600
Or who's the best person to check with? Or if
106
00:05:23.639 --> 00:05:25.439
you're a team on one person, like you really are
107
00:05:25.680 --> 00:05:27.360
kind of thinking like okay, who I need who do
108
00:05:27.360 --> 00:05:30.160
I need to validate this with? But definitely, you know,
109
00:05:30.199 --> 00:05:33.360
it's the way you go to school. There's straight answers, right,
110
00:05:33.360 --> 00:05:37.240
it's fine, solve for X equels to you're trying to
111
00:05:37.240 --> 00:05:40.360
solve for that, or you're a science class you're trying
112
00:05:40.399 --> 00:05:43.000
to do some chemistry problems. So there's very straight forward
113
00:05:43.040 --> 00:05:46.160
answers when you're in school, but as you evolved, you
114
00:05:46.199 --> 00:05:50.000
realize that it always is, it depends, it depends, it depends.
115
00:05:50.079 --> 00:05:52.560
So definitely it's a you know, a difference in like
116
00:05:52.600 --> 00:05:54.839
formal education versus once you get into the real world.
117
00:05:55.639 --> 00:05:58.319
Tell us about kind of where you're at in your
118
00:05:58.319 --> 00:06:01.360
career right now, because you've been in this field for
119
00:06:01.399 --> 00:06:01.879
some time.
120
00:06:02.439 --> 00:06:05.199
Yes, yeah, it's kind of a it's a it's a
121
00:06:05.240 --> 00:06:08.600
mixed bag. I don't want to have started my career
122
00:06:08.639 --> 00:06:13.360
as more individual contributor, kind of back in business intelligence
123
00:06:13.399 --> 00:06:18.879
reporting administrators, so more technical platform base, and then I
124
00:06:18.879 --> 00:06:23.160
got some opportunities to work in ETL so database development,
125
00:06:23.560 --> 00:06:26.279
and then I got into leadership. So I've been in
126
00:06:26.399 --> 00:06:29.680
leadership for about going on twelve years now, so it
127
00:06:29.720 --> 00:06:33.360
is in the twenty fourteen different levels leadership, so kind
128
00:06:33.360 --> 00:06:36.560
of a manager, senior manager, now in a.
129
00:06:36.800 --> 00:06:37.680
In a director role.
130
00:06:37.800 --> 00:06:41.360
So now in kind of the senior leadership realm of
131
00:06:41.399 --> 00:06:44.560
how do you create like sense, we take a team,
132
00:06:44.680 --> 00:06:48.160
create a strategy, leverage that strategy to benefit the business.
133
00:06:48.199 --> 00:06:50.240
Get to sell ideas. You have to sell strategy.
134
00:06:50.759 --> 00:06:53.160
You have to connect the business to your team to
135
00:06:53.160 --> 00:06:55.120
figure out Okay, the business is struggling with this, how
136
00:06:55.160 --> 00:06:57.879
does our team best help with that? So I'll say
137
00:06:57.920 --> 00:06:59.399
that's a day to day But also on the side,
138
00:06:59.480 --> 00:07:02.879
I do lot of networking. So I co founded a
139
00:07:02.959 --> 00:07:06.120
local data networking group called Data and the D. The
140
00:07:06.160 --> 00:07:08.199
industry keeps changing. Now we're talking about this thing called
141
00:07:08.199 --> 00:07:09.759
AI and a lot of us are figuring that out.
142
00:07:09.800 --> 00:07:11.800
So I think that's the new part of my career
143
00:07:11.879 --> 00:07:14.920
is kind of the networking part of being interesting people learning,
144
00:07:15.040 --> 00:07:19.560
asking questions and just trying to vet things out and
145
00:07:19.639 --> 00:07:22.920
kind of even course correct and challenge myself on things
146
00:07:23.199 --> 00:07:26.639
because I realized is now, once you work in a
147
00:07:26.680 --> 00:07:28.959
company for a long time, you have a set way
148
00:07:28.959 --> 00:07:31.160
of thinking about things, but kind of talking to other
149
00:07:31.199 --> 00:07:34.600
people and writing things on LinkedIn and having DM conversations
150
00:07:34.680 --> 00:07:37.279
or things like this or conferences, those really do challenge
151
00:07:37.319 --> 00:07:39.759
you're thinking, help you think about there may be different
152
00:07:39.800 --> 00:07:40.600
ways to do things.
153
00:07:40.600 --> 00:07:42.240
How can we do this at our company?
154
00:07:42.439 --> 00:07:46.199
So yeah, say kind of leadership and thought leadership and
155
00:07:46.240 --> 00:07:48.839
networking are kind of the current phase of my career.
156
00:07:49.839 --> 00:07:53.399
You've really built up an incredible career for yourself. You're
157
00:07:53.439 --> 00:07:56.199
a director. Now, how long have you been at Carhart.
158
00:07:57.279 --> 00:07:57.839
Three and a half.
159
00:07:57.839 --> 00:08:02.800
Years, so number of twenty twenty two, so it's in
160
00:08:02.839 --> 00:08:05.560
about three and a half years, which is time flies
161
00:08:05.600 --> 00:08:06.040
for sure.
162
00:08:06.800 --> 00:08:08.920
I think it's amazing that you also built up this
163
00:08:08.959 --> 00:08:13.439
community for yourself. And I also read an article about
164
00:08:13.439 --> 00:08:15.040
this the other day. I wish I could figure out
165
00:08:15.079 --> 00:08:17.560
where it was, but they were saying that once you're
166
00:08:17.560 --> 00:08:20.240
in a role for a certain number of years, eventually
167
00:08:20.279 --> 00:08:22.920
you kind of stop learning new things and then you
168
00:08:23.680 --> 00:08:27.079
become as knowledgeable as a new person who is entering
169
00:08:27.879 --> 00:08:29.920
the role. And that just kind of blew my mind
170
00:08:29.959 --> 00:08:32.879
of just how important it is to be continuing to
171
00:08:32.879 --> 00:08:35.679
put yourself out there, speak with people, get new ideas,
172
00:08:35.919 --> 00:08:36.679
and that kind of thing.
173
00:08:37.360 --> 00:08:39.480
Yeah, because a lot of that is, you know, we're human,
174
00:08:39.600 --> 00:08:42.639
so I may have a skill set, so I go
175
00:08:42.679 --> 00:08:46.080
into a company, I have ideas, and because also companies
176
00:08:46.120 --> 00:08:47.960
will only let you allow you to do certain things,
177
00:08:47.960 --> 00:08:49.720
so I may have a way I want to do things,
178
00:08:49.720 --> 00:08:52.679
but you're also kind of limited to either a tech
179
00:08:52.679 --> 00:08:55.960
stack or change management can be tough with the company,
180
00:08:56.000 --> 00:08:58.039
depending what business you work with. So you kind of
181
00:08:58.039 --> 00:09:00.279
get to that comfortable phase where you feel very comfortable. Right, Hey,
182
00:09:00.320 --> 00:09:01.960
I know that I know my daily job is going
183
00:09:02.000 --> 00:09:04.240
to be I know the kind of the things I
184
00:09:04.279 --> 00:09:06.639
want to work on that may change a little bit,
185
00:09:06.639 --> 00:09:08.120
but you do kind of get a little bit comfortable
186
00:09:08.120 --> 00:09:10.320
after a couple of years, and then that's where I
187
00:09:10.320 --> 00:09:12.799
think you need to you need those outside forces to
188
00:09:12.919 --> 00:09:15.600
challenge you because I found out you get too complacent
189
00:09:15.720 --> 00:09:17.559
because I think about the company has always changed, the
190
00:09:17.559 --> 00:09:20.759
company and the business always moving. So if you become stagnant,
191
00:09:20.759 --> 00:09:22.960
then you become a liability or bottleneck for the company.
192
00:09:23.039 --> 00:09:25.960
And as you're seeing through like LinkedIn and different things
193
00:09:25.960 --> 00:09:28.840
out there, like people are losing their jobs because the company.
194
00:09:28.840 --> 00:09:30.759
You're like, what do we doing my AI, how are
195
00:09:30.759 --> 00:09:31.600
we moving our company for?
196
00:09:31.679 --> 00:09:33.120
But if you're saying, well, we're doing the exact same
197
00:09:33.159 --> 00:09:35.759
thing we did years ago, I think it's not like
198
00:09:36.000 --> 00:09:38.960
those things don't fly. Companies are looking to improve. You
199
00:09:39.000 --> 00:09:40.960
have new leadership that comes in all the time and
200
00:09:41.000 --> 00:09:44.000
they want new ideas. So making sure they have new
201
00:09:44.000 --> 00:09:47.720
ideas and not saying stagnant I think is a huge career.
202
00:09:49.240 --> 00:09:50.399
Lesson. I would get it to people.
203
00:09:50.480 --> 00:09:52.480
Just making sure that you're saying on top of things
204
00:09:52.480 --> 00:09:54.559
because you're if you're leader comes to you and say
205
00:09:54.559 --> 00:09:55.799
well this AI thing you said, well, I don't know,
206
00:09:55.799 --> 00:09:58.200
I've never heard of it. Like, that's not a good answer. You,
207
00:09:58.240 --> 00:10:00.240
like all of us, need to be prepared to talk
208
00:10:00.279 --> 00:10:02.600
about what's going on and why. You may think that
209
00:10:02.639 --> 00:10:05.559
it's not the best suitable plan for the company right now.
210
00:10:05.919 --> 00:10:07.559
You need to defend that and say, well, based off
211
00:10:07.600 --> 00:10:10.279
these things, I don't think that we should go this route. However,
212
00:10:11.000 --> 00:10:13.320
to make improvements, we should go this route instead. But
213
00:10:13.440 --> 00:10:15.320
just saying well I'm not hired to do that or
214
00:10:15.360 --> 00:10:18.080
I just do this, it's not going to serve you
215
00:10:18.080 --> 00:10:19.279
well long term.
216
00:10:19.759 --> 00:10:25.000
Do you feel like companies are like creating space for innovation?
217
00:10:25.360 --> 00:10:25.600
Yeah.
218
00:10:25.799 --> 00:10:27.519
I think part of that is figuring out the DNA
219
00:10:27.840 --> 00:10:30.240
right for Carhart, I think we stick true to our
220
00:10:30.240 --> 00:10:33.080
mission statement, but there's ways to be innovative around that,
221
00:10:33.519 --> 00:10:35.440
And a lot of the innovation is is from the
222
00:10:35.480 --> 00:10:37.840
team members. It's bringing ideas to your leader. I think
223
00:10:37.879 --> 00:10:41.559
there's a cultural aspect of it, but I think it's hard.
224
00:10:41.799 --> 00:10:44.240
People don't really say no, it's really just no one
225
00:10:44.240 --> 00:10:46.279
has brought up the idea for us. So I would
226
00:10:46.320 --> 00:10:48.559
say to the listeners it's you know, if you have ideas,
227
00:10:48.919 --> 00:10:50.799
bring them to your leader, but not just an idea,
228
00:10:50.840 --> 00:10:53.080
but it's a full Okay, I think we should do
229
00:10:53.120 --> 00:10:54.759
this for these reasons.
230
00:10:54.879 --> 00:10:55.840
Here should be involved that.
231
00:10:55.919 --> 00:10:57.559
So I think it's a hey, I think we should
232
00:10:57.559 --> 00:10:59.919
move to this platform for these reasons. It'll cost this,
233
00:11:00.039 --> 00:11:03.240
but I think having ideas because sometimes innovation people think
234
00:11:03.279 --> 00:11:04.679
is just like I just the ideas at the wall.
235
00:11:04.759 --> 00:11:07.399
But I think it's fully like, what is the idea,
236
00:11:07.440 --> 00:11:09.600
Why is it beneficial? Why should we go this route
237
00:11:09.679 --> 00:11:12.120
has a couple of benefit from it. I think innovation
238
00:11:12.240 --> 00:11:15.399
is there, but it's you have to be the champion
239
00:11:15.399 --> 00:11:17.559
of that. If you're just waiting for your leader to
240
00:11:17.600 --> 00:11:19.759
spark innovation, I think that's not I mean, sure your
241
00:11:19.799 --> 00:11:22.320
leaders should be doing that, but in the event they're not,
242
00:11:22.399 --> 00:11:24.799
then you should be the person that just brings ideas
243
00:11:24.840 --> 00:11:28.159
and kind of identify different opportunities. I mean, it's also
244
00:11:28.159 --> 00:11:30.559
a way to advance your career. Is kind of helping to.
245
00:11:32.759 --> 00:11:35.080
Occurs change and kind of be a change agent.
246
00:11:36.559 --> 00:11:38.159
Makes it a lot easier for someone to make a
247
00:11:38.240 --> 00:11:39.799
choice when they've got more context.
248
00:11:40.080 --> 00:11:41.559
Yeah, I mean I think about in your friend group.
249
00:11:41.559 --> 00:11:44.440
I using an analogy of imagining your friend chat. Someone
250
00:11:44.519 --> 00:11:46.440
just says Hey, guys, we should we should go out
251
00:11:46.480 --> 00:11:49.240
to dinner, and everyone says we should, but what does
252
00:11:49.279 --> 00:11:52.360
that mean? What you really want to see someone say
253
00:11:52.440 --> 00:11:55.480
is hey, we should go out to you know, Narrobread
254
00:11:55.879 --> 00:11:58.120
on Friday at six o'clock.
255
00:11:58.279 --> 00:12:00.840
For like, it's the.
256
00:12:00.120 --> 00:12:02.399
Actual laying out the idea versuses we should out to dinner,
257
00:12:02.440 --> 00:12:03.720
or we should go see a concert, or to go
258
00:12:03.720 --> 00:12:04.200
see a movie.
259
00:12:04.279 --> 00:12:06.519
Okay, which movie? What night? Like?
260
00:12:06.600 --> 00:12:09.360
So I think that's the difference between just throwing out
261
00:12:09.440 --> 00:12:11.639
ideas versus truly let being like, hey, let's actually do
262
00:12:11.720 --> 00:12:14.559
something new that we haven't done in a while, or
263
00:12:14.879 --> 00:12:18.320
trying to encourage interactions. It's a full idea versus just
264
00:12:18.639 --> 00:12:21.639
an abstract concept of this thing. You're like, Okay, that's
265
00:12:21.639 --> 00:12:25.799
not gonna happen, even for us. I mean for my
266
00:12:26.200 --> 00:12:28.960
networking group. We had a conference. So we did our
267
00:12:29.000 --> 00:12:32.000
first ever conference last year November. That start off as
268
00:12:32.080 --> 00:12:34.720
just an idea in March of we should do a conference,
269
00:12:34.720 --> 00:12:36.720
and then it was a Okay, people thought it was
270
00:12:36.720 --> 00:12:38.919
a good idea. So let's get an event planner, let's
271
00:12:38.960 --> 00:12:42.000
figure out speakers, we need to put together a sponsor package,
272
00:12:42.320 --> 00:12:44.440
we need to secure a venue, we need to open
273
00:12:44.519 --> 00:12:45.360
up a bank account.
274
00:12:45.360 --> 00:12:47.039
So I think I think it's good.
275
00:12:47.159 --> 00:12:49.159
It's good to have ideas, but then it's say, Okay,
276
00:12:49.200 --> 00:12:51.919
who's taking the next steps to move this forward and
277
00:12:52.000 --> 00:12:54.200
kind of make it something. So I think it's part
278
00:12:54.200 --> 00:12:56.320
of innovation that I think people lose sight on is
279
00:12:56.360 --> 00:12:58.200
just you have to continue to make steps on the
280
00:12:58.279 --> 00:13:00.799
day by day basis, is not to starting an idea
281
00:13:00.799 --> 00:13:02.879
and just hoping that you know something's going to work out.
282
00:13:03.919 --> 00:13:06.080
I have felt it before where it's like you've got
283
00:13:06.080 --> 00:13:08.799
really smart people with great ideas and they want to
284
00:13:08.799 --> 00:13:11.440
implement something, but they just they don't really know how
285
00:13:11.440 --> 00:13:12.840
to take that across the finish line.
286
00:13:12.879 --> 00:13:16.240
The tricky part is about to share those stories. So
287
00:13:16.440 --> 00:13:18.159
in many cases, I think people are doing things, but
288
00:13:18.200 --> 00:13:20.679
it's kind of hidden behind closed doors. They don't hear
289
00:13:20.720 --> 00:13:23.200
about it. So I think I'm definitely a current people
290
00:13:23.200 --> 00:13:25.080
to kind of share what they're doing. But I'll say,
291
00:13:25.080 --> 00:13:30.039
you know, platforms, architecture, you know, AI is really changing
292
00:13:30.080 --> 00:13:31.799
a lot of things in terms of you hearing about
293
00:13:31.840 --> 00:13:34.639
pair programming, So I'm I don't think AI is going
294
00:13:34.720 --> 00:13:38.720
to replace programmers, but I have heard things about AI
295
00:13:39.120 --> 00:13:41.240
being able to help out with that. You know eighty
296
00:13:41.279 --> 00:13:43.759
twenty rule where they can do eighty percent. You can
297
00:13:43.799 --> 00:13:46.120
do the tweaking of it, but then you use your
298
00:13:46.320 --> 00:13:48.840
industry knowledge and your specific knowledge actually fill in the
299
00:13:48.879 --> 00:13:51.039
gaps to kind of say, Okay, for card, this is
300
00:13:51.039 --> 00:13:53.159
what that looks like, and or it could do the
301
00:13:53.159 --> 00:13:55.440
twenty percent you do at eighty percent. But I think
302
00:13:55.519 --> 00:13:58.960
that in this new world of AI, there there's definitely
303
00:13:59.000 --> 00:14:02.440
going to be a sense of of expectation of getting
304
00:14:02.480 --> 00:14:05.840
ideas or new concepts or different ways of doing things
305
00:14:06.279 --> 00:14:08.399
versus just this is how we did this before, because
306
00:14:08.399 --> 00:14:10.080
our businesses are starting to ask for it.
307
00:14:11.000 --> 00:14:13.399
With the emergence of AI and all of these different
308
00:14:13.399 --> 00:14:18.559
opportunities that are available. How do you feel like that's changed.
309
00:14:19.240 --> 00:14:21.240
I guess the way that we define what it means
310
00:14:21.279 --> 00:14:22.159
to be data driven.
311
00:14:22.240 --> 00:14:25.320
Think about even with me, I write, I write a
312
00:14:25.519 --> 00:14:28.320
LinkedIn quite a bit. So typically when I post something,
313
00:14:28.360 --> 00:14:30.919
i'll write something I use this tool call it Grammarly.
314
00:14:30.960 --> 00:14:32.679
I'll put it into grammarly to kind of fix all
315
00:14:32.679 --> 00:14:34.759
the grammar changes and things like that, then.
316
00:14:34.679 --> 00:14:36.279
I'll post it. So that's part of my workflow.
317
00:14:36.639 --> 00:14:39.480
So I think we have this new normal where it's
318
00:14:39.960 --> 00:14:41.679
going to be in our workflow to kind of make
319
00:14:41.759 --> 00:14:44.759
us either more efficient we can do things faster or
320
00:14:44.799 --> 00:14:46.480
at a layer quality on top of it where we
321
00:14:46.559 --> 00:14:49.840
didn't have that before. I think it's gonna become the default,
322
00:14:49.919 --> 00:14:51.799
and our businesses are trying to say that too. Okay,
323
00:14:51.840 --> 00:14:53.960
where we use an AI, put some AI and this,
324
00:14:54.039 --> 00:14:56.399
So I think that's where we're it's become the default
325
00:14:56.440 --> 00:14:59.320
of I have a process, but I think about how
326
00:14:59.320 --> 00:15:01.559
do I use it AI to take it to the
327
00:15:01.559 --> 00:15:05.120
next level or amplify that because what I'm doing now
328
00:15:05.360 --> 00:15:07.399
is fine, but I can be better.
329
00:15:07.559 --> 00:15:11.559
Have you seen cases where you're able to identify, like
330
00:15:12.559 --> 00:15:15.080
I don't know whether or not a particular use case
331
00:15:15.080 --> 00:15:18.480
for AI is actually going to be beneficial for the company,
332
00:15:18.559 --> 00:15:22.399
because one of the challenges I've seen is like this
333
00:15:22.559 --> 00:15:27.399
differentiation between we want to implement AI, so let's just
334
00:15:27.639 --> 00:15:30.639
find new solutions to problems that we may not quite
335
00:15:30.720 --> 00:15:33.519
have yet. We're just excited to implement it, versus something
336
00:15:33.519 --> 00:15:35.360
that's actually solving a business problem.
337
00:15:36.320 --> 00:15:40.600
Yes, I think the challenge is that AI is probabilistic,
338
00:15:40.639 --> 00:15:44.360
where especially JENAI, it's using math and science to kind
339
00:15:44.360 --> 00:15:47.320
of think about what's the best sequence of words and
340
00:15:47.360 --> 00:15:49.720
texts and things like that. So in many cases, if
341
00:15:49.720 --> 00:15:51.600
you have a very determined this system where it's a
342
00:15:51.679 --> 00:15:54.840
very straightforward rule set of if this then that, if
343
00:15:54.879 --> 00:15:57.480
that then that, then it's not the best, Like it's
344
00:15:57.519 --> 00:15:59.879
kind of overkill. And I think that's what I always
345
00:16:00.240 --> 00:16:03.759
myself of is sometimes you can use tried and true
346
00:16:03.759 --> 00:16:06.639
methods because they're cheaper, they're world established, more people know
347
00:16:06.679 --> 00:16:08.879
how to use this stuff. So I think, you know,
348
00:16:08.919 --> 00:16:12.799
trying to use AI for everything is a challenge. I think,
349
00:16:12.840 --> 00:16:15.279
you know, you have to look at you have to
350
00:16:15.360 --> 00:16:17.399
justify why you instead of defaulting. Yeah, I think the
351
00:16:17.679 --> 00:16:20.240
better questions, Hey, why do I need AI to do that?
352
00:16:20.480 --> 00:16:22.720
When I can use all these other methods. So maybe
353
00:16:22.720 --> 00:16:25.279
we've been doing workflow, We've been doing business process automation
354
00:16:25.320 --> 00:16:28.480
and workflow rules for you know, for decades now. So
355
00:16:28.879 --> 00:16:32.240
I think people struggle with the best way to use
356
00:16:32.279 --> 00:16:35.240
it because I think it's a difference between like very
357
00:16:35.320 --> 00:16:38.679
rules driven. Like when something's rules driven, AI is not
358
00:16:38.759 --> 00:16:41.519
the best use case for that because you already know,
359
00:16:41.559 --> 00:16:43.919
like you already can put in very simple checks around
360
00:16:43.960 --> 00:16:46.519
what it is. But if like when we talk about
361
00:16:46.519 --> 00:16:49.360
things like marketing copy where it's the language could be different.
362
00:16:49.360 --> 00:16:51.159
It really depends.
363
00:16:52.120 --> 00:16:54.279
Or you're doing kind of process documentation where you're trying
364
00:16:54.320 --> 00:16:56.399
to use language to translate that to that where it
365
00:16:56.399 --> 00:16:58.799
could be you can make those tweaks. So I think
366
00:16:58.799 --> 00:17:00.759
there's many use cases out there. You may have an idea,
367
00:17:00.799 --> 00:17:02.639
but you realize, yeah, AI is not good for that.
368
00:17:02.720 --> 00:17:05.839
It's it's too it's it's it's too simple. It's like
369
00:17:05.880 --> 00:17:07.640
what we're trying to do is is too simple for
370
00:17:07.720 --> 00:17:11.000
air or also, if you think about it, you have
371
00:17:11.039 --> 00:17:13.079
to support this. So all these use cases, if you
372
00:17:13.119 --> 00:17:15.759
implement something, you have to have people involved to keep
373
00:17:15.799 --> 00:17:18.200
it going. What happens when it breaks, Like someone has
374
00:17:18.279 --> 00:17:20.240
to go and figure out what happened. So if you
375
00:17:20.359 --> 00:17:22.839
if you're doing all these all these brand new things,
376
00:17:23.200 --> 00:17:26.519
you need to have a either contractors, consultants or team
377
00:17:26.599 --> 00:17:28.559
that supports that. You can't just implement this and they
378
00:17:28.599 --> 00:17:32.279
run away. Because everything breaks. Everything in your house, everything breaks,
379
00:17:33.000 --> 00:17:34.799
everything breaks, so someone asks to come in here and
380
00:17:34.799 --> 00:17:36.599
fix that. So if you're doing the latest and greatest,
381
00:17:37.079 --> 00:17:38.680
the people that can go in there and like solve
382
00:17:38.720 --> 00:17:40.559
that for you or fix it is very limited. So
383
00:17:41.480 --> 00:17:44.480
definitely a lot of vetting out of use cases. But
384
00:17:44.480 --> 00:17:46.680
it's fair. I would say it's challenging to find true
385
00:17:46.720 --> 00:17:50.960
AI use cases just because you it's not the default.
386
00:17:51.000 --> 00:17:53.440
It's kind of the let's justify why we would use
387
00:17:53.480 --> 00:17:55.079
AD in this case because nothing else works.
388
00:17:55.920 --> 00:17:58.799
When you were mentioning like rules based, I think you
389
00:17:58.839 --> 00:18:01.599
were saying, like AI is not the best for rules.
390
00:18:01.680 --> 00:18:03.000
Can you give a couple examples?
391
00:18:03.960 --> 00:18:06.400
So if I'm doing a workflow, if I'm doing a
392
00:18:06.440 --> 00:18:11.799
process workflow of let's say AP where I get an invoice,
393
00:18:12.319 --> 00:18:15.599
I want to double check, I want to tell I
394
00:18:15.599 --> 00:18:17.400
get an invoice, I have a feel where it has
395
00:18:17.440 --> 00:18:20.680
the vendor, I verify the spending limits, I set up
396
00:18:20.680 --> 00:18:22.640
an approver, and I pay the invoice.
397
00:18:22.799 --> 00:18:23.960
Like, that's a very specific rules.
398
00:18:24.160 --> 00:18:26.720
I know that when this happens, do this, check this
399
00:18:26.920 --> 00:18:29.000
value with that, and it goes to the next step
400
00:18:29.000 --> 00:18:31.000
and the next step. So in that situation, if you
401
00:18:31.039 --> 00:18:33.640
have very specific steps that you do the exact same
402
00:18:33.640 --> 00:18:35.720
steps every time, there's no variability.
403
00:18:35.720 --> 00:18:36.799
You're following the same steps.
404
00:18:37.200 --> 00:18:39.599
There's no point of using AI versus just using tried
405
00:18:39.640 --> 00:18:42.680
and true workflows of just a bunch of different boxes
406
00:18:42.680 --> 00:18:45.799
connected in cereal. And then they just kind of go
407
00:18:46.000 --> 00:18:48.839
and they implement the process, So are they putting an
408
00:18:48.880 --> 00:18:50.720
a solution on that? You have to ask the question
409
00:18:50.799 --> 00:18:54.400
of well, what's the value proposite with you know, why
410
00:18:54.400 --> 00:18:56.519
would you use an LM in the situation if it's
411
00:18:56.599 --> 00:18:58.839
just a very simple I don't se sequence stuff.
412
00:18:58.839 --> 00:19:00.000
So that's a lot of the question wrong. Eight.
413
00:19:00.240 --> 00:19:02.759
So a lot of people talking about AI agents, but
414
00:19:02.799 --> 00:19:04.759
you have to think a lot of people think about
415
00:19:04.759 --> 00:19:07.680
walking use agent for that when you realize it's just
416
00:19:07.680 --> 00:19:10.400
a straightforward set of steps really an agent, it's not
417
00:19:10.440 --> 00:19:12.279
going to be very helpful in that scenario.
418
00:19:13.119 --> 00:19:14.839
No, that makes a lot of sense because it's like
419
00:19:14.920 --> 00:19:17.880
what you're describing would be the difference between automation.
420
00:19:17.680 --> 00:19:20.759
Versus craig and like, we've been doing that for a
421
00:19:20.799 --> 00:19:23.079
long time. That's not really AI use case. So I
422
00:19:23.119 --> 00:19:25.319
think a lot of us in the past, probably a
423
00:19:25.319 --> 00:19:27.079
couple of years, are all dealing with that same thing
424
00:19:27.119 --> 00:19:29.279
where we're kind of trying to vet out all these
425
00:19:29.359 --> 00:19:31.720
use cases and people bring things to you, but you're saying,
426
00:19:31.720 --> 00:19:36.279
well that's automation bucket, that's or eliminate that process altogether,
427
00:19:36.640 --> 00:19:40.680
or sometimes it's completely overhauling a process. Let's not even
428
00:19:40.720 --> 00:19:42.640
talk about automation AIA, how about we just get rid
429
00:19:42.640 --> 00:19:44.559
of that, or we need to simplify that in a
430
00:19:44.640 --> 00:19:47.680
much different way. So the good news is that we're
431
00:19:47.680 --> 00:19:50.559
all trying different things, and like we brought up innovation,
432
00:19:50.680 --> 00:19:54.279
it's the The good thing is that the businesses are
433
00:19:54.319 --> 00:19:56.559
thinking about how do we do things differently, how we
434
00:19:56.640 --> 00:20:00.319
use our existing workforce more efficiently, how do we scale
435
00:20:00.400 --> 00:20:02.759
our operations, how do we get the most out of this?
436
00:20:02.920 --> 00:20:05.839
So I think that there's an inspiration or light bulb blup, Hey,
437
00:20:05.880 --> 00:20:08.440
there's better ways to do things. And even if AI
438
00:20:08.559 --> 00:20:10.880
is not the right solution, it's still someone thought to
439
00:20:11.799 --> 00:20:14.000
try something different or they're trying to figure out ways
440
00:20:14.279 --> 00:20:17.119
to make improvements. So I think at least AI has
441
00:20:17.240 --> 00:20:19.640
provided that too. Ethinic society is in terms of a
442
00:20:20.160 --> 00:20:21.920
you know, there may be better ways to do this
443
00:20:22.880 --> 00:20:26.079
or more efficient So and now I'll one more point there.
444
00:20:26.160 --> 00:20:30.319
So I've used AI and for somebody. I have many children.
445
00:20:30.400 --> 00:20:32.759
They all have different school lists. So in August I
446
00:20:32.839 --> 00:20:35.079
get I get the school list from the teachers, but
447
00:20:35.119 --> 00:20:37.599
I have five children, so I get five different school lists,
448
00:20:38.000 --> 00:20:39.240
so I have to put them on, especially cause I'm
449
00:20:39.279 --> 00:20:41.119
only going to shop one time. Not shopping fight different times,
450
00:20:41.160 --> 00:20:43.079
So I think I put in groc where I'd said
451
00:20:43.359 --> 00:20:45.359
I'd say groc or whatever I use at the time.
452
00:20:45.400 --> 00:20:48.720
I said, take these, take these lists, upload.
453
00:20:48.359 --> 00:20:51.559
These, figure out, combine all this list together to make
454
00:20:51.599 --> 00:20:54.440
more big spreadsheet around. They need to buy twenty crayons,
455
00:20:54.480 --> 00:20:57.079
they'd buy ten pencils. So that was a use case
456
00:20:57.119 --> 00:20:59.240
because it would spend me hours trying to look at
457
00:20:59.240 --> 00:21:01.839
every single thing, trying to collapse them all and say,
458
00:21:01.839 --> 00:21:05.680
crayon's there, crayons there. So that was a situation where
459
00:21:06.240 --> 00:21:07.839
it wasn't like a I can't that's not really a
460
00:21:07.880 --> 00:21:09.680
rules strip. It's more like a hey, take this, like
461
00:21:09.720 --> 00:21:14.559
take this, take these different pdf there are different structures,
462
00:21:14.880 --> 00:21:17.000
and try to figure out the language, try to translate
463
00:21:17.039 --> 00:21:20.119
this together to hammondize that. So you know it definitely
464
00:21:20.160 --> 00:21:22.160
that saved me a ton of time, like hours try
465
00:21:22.200 --> 00:21:25.119
to collapse all these school lists. It's a one straightforward
466
00:21:25.119 --> 00:21:28.079
school supply list that I can then go ordering and
467
00:21:28.160 --> 00:21:29.279
get a bunch of school supplies.
468
00:21:29.359 --> 00:21:31.960
It's got such a huge potential to save a lot
469
00:21:32.000 --> 00:21:34.720
of time. The use cases are very interesting. Would you
470
00:21:34.759 --> 00:21:37.440
mind sharing a little bit about the kinds of problems
471
00:21:37.480 --> 00:21:40.920
that you're working dissolve as a director at Carhart.
472
00:21:41.680 --> 00:21:43.519
A lot of it is a lot of his cross
473
00:21:43.519 --> 00:21:47.680
functional nature, just different business units asking for things, but
474
00:21:47.759 --> 00:21:50.720
trying to cut across to figure out how all these
475
00:21:50.720 --> 00:21:53.960
things impact each other and they work together. So supply
476
00:21:54.079 --> 00:21:56.960
chain may get this metric, our customer care teammate get
477
00:21:56.960 --> 00:22:00.240
that metric, and our other teammate it another metric. So
478
00:22:00.240 --> 00:22:03.440
how do I bring all that together to tell the
479
00:22:03.440 --> 00:22:06.359
story about how it impacts the business and overall what
480
00:22:06.400 --> 00:22:07.839
we're trying to do with that. So I don't have
481
00:22:07.960 --> 00:22:09.799
data engineering, I don't have data science, but kind of
482
00:22:09.839 --> 00:22:12.559
everything else falls on me in terms of kind of
483
00:22:12.599 --> 00:22:15.880
your BI and analytics. We have a center of excellence
484
00:22:15.880 --> 00:22:18.000
as well, so sharing with people like you know, we
485
00:22:18.039 --> 00:22:20.279
can't build everything, but also sharing the knowledge of this
486
00:22:20.359 --> 00:22:25.039
is how you would build this into HARBI yourself, because
487
00:22:25.160 --> 00:22:27.119
you know, we can't do everything ourselves, so we do
488
00:22:27.200 --> 00:22:28.759
try to get that out to different users so they
489
00:22:28.759 --> 00:22:31.119
can you know, this is the models we have, This
490
00:22:31.200 --> 00:22:33.720
is how you use that in your own in.
491
00:22:33.680 --> 00:22:34.440
Your own day to day.
492
00:22:34.920 --> 00:22:37.720
How do you work with your analysts to kind of
493
00:22:37.759 --> 00:22:39.440
find the signal amongst the noise.
494
00:22:40.799 --> 00:22:43.240
I mean, prioritization is pretty key.
495
00:22:43.279 --> 00:22:45.759
So we work with our stakeholders pretty closely to figure
496
00:22:45.759 --> 00:22:49.039
out the what's the high priority work for them, because
497
00:22:49.039 --> 00:22:51.119
everyone's going to tell you different stories, like different groups
498
00:22:51.119 --> 00:22:52.400
are going to say this is more important to me,
499
00:22:52.440 --> 00:22:54.519
this is more important to me. So part of it
500
00:22:54.559 --> 00:22:58.160
is just understanding from our stakeholders just what's their top
501
00:22:58.200 --> 00:23:00.119
three or top five. Then try because you know, we
502
00:23:00.160 --> 00:23:03.240
have limited resources, even we can't do everything, so a
503
00:23:03.279 --> 00:23:05.480
lot of that is just trying to a lot of
504
00:23:05.519 --> 00:23:08.519
the relationship building. So working with our stakeholders ask them
505
00:23:08.599 --> 00:23:10.319
just you know, what's the priority is, what we should
506
00:23:10.319 --> 00:23:13.559
be working on, what maketures are important, what questions are
507
00:23:13.559 --> 00:23:15.920
they trying to answer, what decisions they're trying to make.
508
00:23:16.880 --> 00:23:18.440
And then based off that, then I think is when
509
00:23:18.440 --> 00:23:19.960
we can kind of start to build out and say
510
00:23:19.960 --> 00:23:22.519
what we have that we can build this out for you,
511
00:23:22.599 --> 00:23:23.759
and then we can give that to you or we
512
00:23:23.799 --> 00:23:25.319
can show you that, hey, this is how you would
513
00:23:25.359 --> 00:23:27.279
use that, or this is how you can leverage that.
514
00:23:28.799 --> 00:23:31.200
I think the tricky part that I've seen, and we're
515
00:23:31.240 --> 00:23:35.200
on a loan where you know, companies don't have large
516
00:23:35.319 --> 00:23:39.519
analyst teams like a couple, a couple functions may have
517
00:23:39.599 --> 00:23:42.319
like a data analyst or a business and that does
518
00:23:42.359 --> 00:23:45.240
some data work. So you know there's some data work
519
00:23:45.240 --> 00:23:47.039
that's done out in the business units, but a lot
520
00:23:47.039 --> 00:23:48.960
of that does fall onto the data team to kind
521
00:23:48.960 --> 00:23:50.960
of help fill in the gaps in terms of Okay,
522
00:23:51.039 --> 00:23:53.200
we've here's some data we can pull for you, or
523
00:23:53.319 --> 00:23:54.920
based off what you're saying, here's what we think you
524
00:23:54.920 --> 00:23:58.039
can use. So I think that's where I'm also kind
525
00:23:58.039 --> 00:24:00.839
of focused on too, is like how do you scale that?
526
00:24:01.119 --> 00:24:04.839
Just because every group doesn't have a dedicated analyst, so
527
00:24:04.880 --> 00:24:07.279
how do we automate, like either through AI or something
528
00:24:07.279 --> 00:24:09.480
like that, Like how do you how do you scale
529
00:24:09.680 --> 00:24:13.079
that analytical nature of like okay, the data change, what happened,
530
00:24:13.079 --> 00:24:14.880
why did it happen, What's going to happen next?
531
00:24:15.200 --> 00:24:17.079
So I think that's kind of the next frontier line.
532
00:24:17.119 --> 00:24:19.200
The data work is going past so you have bi
533
00:24:19.400 --> 00:24:22.039
of course, but it's also going past how to say, okay,
534
00:24:22.279 --> 00:24:25.079
BAEd off the metrics we capture, What does this mean?
535
00:24:25.240 --> 00:24:27.240
Why is it interesting? Like what is this going to
536
00:24:27.319 --> 00:24:30.359
tell the company? So I think that's where because we
537
00:24:30.359 --> 00:24:31.880
don't have enough people, we do not have enough bodies
538
00:24:31.880 --> 00:24:34.519
to do that, So that's goes to the efficiency and
539
00:24:34.559 --> 00:24:37.039
how do you use different methods to tell that story.
540
00:24:37.759 --> 00:24:40.519
It's an interesting problem but makes me think about just
541
00:24:40.799 --> 00:24:43.720
self service dashboards obviously. I mean a lot of teams
542
00:24:43.759 --> 00:24:46.079
are working to get more people in the company access
543
00:24:46.160 --> 00:24:48.839
to the right data, but then ensuring that they know
544
00:24:48.960 --> 00:24:51.200
like how to use it, how to filter it, and
545
00:24:51.279 --> 00:24:53.000
how to also make sense of what it is that
546
00:24:53.000 --> 00:24:55.839
they're saying so they don't make a decision based off
547
00:24:55.880 --> 00:24:59.240
of something that's like out of context. Aaron, I would
548
00:24:59.240 --> 00:25:01.599
love to talk with you a little bit about like
549
00:25:01.680 --> 00:25:05.680
your leadership, if that's okay. When you're leading these teams,
550
00:25:05.720 --> 00:25:08.359
you're working with people, what are the values that kind
551
00:25:08.400 --> 00:25:09.799
of drive the way that you lead.
552
00:25:09.920 --> 00:25:12.839
Yeah, I'm still learning, but I would say clarity. I mean,
553
00:25:13.480 --> 00:25:16.559
I'll say being in the weeds as much as you can.
554
00:25:16.680 --> 00:25:18.519
So I try to have one on ones with each
555
00:25:18.519 --> 00:25:21.200
of my direct reports every single week just to keep
556
00:25:21.240 --> 00:25:23.039
on track of like what's going on with the projects
557
00:25:23.039 --> 00:25:24.599
they're working on, just to make sure I have an
558
00:25:24.640 --> 00:25:25.759
idea of just what's going on.
559
00:25:26.240 --> 00:25:27.200
So I think that's that one.
560
00:25:28.079 --> 00:25:30.200
I'm clarity, Like I mentioned in the beginning of it,
561
00:25:30.240 --> 00:25:34.720
just being very clear about roles and responsibilities of like
562
00:25:34.839 --> 00:25:37.839
this happened? Is this team ever evolved? Like are you
563
00:25:37.880 --> 00:25:39.680
involved in this? Are you not involved in this? What's
564
00:25:39.720 --> 00:25:41.240
your role in this? What are you supposed to be doing?
565
00:25:41.279 --> 00:25:43.599
With expectations of you? I think a lot of people
566
00:25:43.799 --> 00:25:46.519
know this frustration that can happen because you think someone
567
00:25:46.519 --> 00:25:49.200
should be involved, but they never, like you never told
568
00:25:49.240 --> 00:25:50.880
them that they should be involved.
569
00:25:50.480 --> 00:25:52.440
And they never confirmed or deny it.
570
00:25:52.480 --> 00:25:55.759
So I think really being clear about expectations of this
571
00:25:55.799 --> 00:25:57.279
is where I need you this week. This is what
572
00:25:57.319 --> 00:26:02.559
I need from you. There's also vision which I'm working
573
00:26:02.599 --> 00:26:05.880
on too, like trying to share a vision of like
574
00:26:05.960 --> 00:26:07.720
this is where I think we need to be going,
575
00:26:07.759 --> 00:26:09.319
and that's why I think we need to be This
576
00:26:09.359 --> 00:26:11.960
is what I think we need to be doing. This
577
00:26:12.039 --> 00:26:13.960
is what I think the team should be aligned to.
578
00:26:14.240 --> 00:26:17.319
I think being repetitive around just like consistently saying the
579
00:26:17.319 --> 00:26:19.799
same things over and over again, just make sure that
580
00:26:19.799 --> 00:26:22.319
people get the message. So a lot of it is
581
00:26:22.359 --> 00:26:24.440
not even like the technical side. I think as you
582
00:26:24.440 --> 00:26:27.680
pull out into the leadership round, like the technical side
583
00:26:27.720 --> 00:26:32.519
isn't as strong, like it's more the change management, sharing strategy,
584
00:26:32.720 --> 00:26:36.599
executing a strategy. So I think that's the tricky part
585
00:26:36.599 --> 00:26:38.559
about a lot of the work that we do is
586
00:26:39.480 --> 00:26:41.240
you're not the reason that you might do like as
587
00:26:41.240 --> 00:26:43.200
you used to be, but you still have to have
588
00:26:43.319 --> 00:26:44.119
to lead the team.
589
00:26:43.960 --> 00:26:44.640
And lead the function.
590
00:26:45.200 --> 00:26:47.440
This is why I like having these kinds of conversations
591
00:26:47.519 --> 00:26:50.079
because you know, for me as a data analyst, I'm
592
00:26:50.079 --> 00:26:52.359
sure for other people who are analysts, it's like you
593
00:26:52.359 --> 00:26:55.519
don't always get the opportunity to speak with a manager
594
00:26:55.640 --> 00:26:58.359
or a director to find out what their perspective is, like,
595
00:26:58.440 --> 00:27:01.519
what they're looking for, what challenge is they experience. I
596
00:27:01.519 --> 00:27:05.440
feel like having that human awareness, you know, this is
597
00:27:05.440 --> 00:27:08.400
somebody on the other side who's got an entirely different
598
00:27:08.440 --> 00:27:11.200
world of their own that they're dealing with that as
599
00:27:11.200 --> 00:27:13.680
an analyst you just don't always get to peek into
600
00:27:13.880 --> 00:27:15.079
is very interesting to me.
601
00:27:16.359 --> 00:27:18.720
Yeah, I think you know, leaders are also figuring these
602
00:27:18.720 --> 00:27:21.079
things out. Like as a leader, when it comes to
603
00:27:21.200 --> 00:27:23.200
a question, we also like none of us know and
604
00:27:23.240 --> 00:27:25.000
we talk to our peers and they don't know either.
605
00:27:25.039 --> 00:27:27.079
So I think that's the that's the secret no one
606
00:27:27.119 --> 00:27:30.559
talks about is when it comes to AI strategy monetization,
607
00:27:30.759 --> 00:27:33.400
ROI like we're all trying to figure this out, like
608
00:27:33.440 --> 00:27:36.359
everyone's trying to We're trying things, we're testing things out.
609
00:27:36.960 --> 00:27:39.440
The question, just as leader, are you, are you showing
610
00:27:39.440 --> 00:27:41.079
your hands to your team and saying, hey, guys, like
611
00:27:41.079 --> 00:27:43.279
I need help with this, like I need input, I
612
00:27:43.279 --> 00:27:45.960
need feedback, I need to I need some responses. So
613
00:27:46.319 --> 00:27:49.359
I think there is some vulnerability too about being open
614
00:27:49.400 --> 00:27:52.480
and sharing you know, these things your team and say hey,
615
00:27:52.519 --> 00:27:55.319
I'm being pressed to figure these things out. I don't
616
00:27:55.359 --> 00:27:57.599
know what's going on. I need your help with this.
617
00:27:58.960 --> 00:28:01.680
But to your point, I mean, I think it's it's
618
00:28:01.799 --> 00:28:05.119
very tough to like we have one on ones, but
619
00:28:05.200 --> 00:28:07.480
it's you need like a separate one on just talking
620
00:28:07.519 --> 00:28:09.240
about these things separate because you want one You usually
621
00:28:09.279 --> 00:28:11.880
talking about like projects, you have half hour project updates,
622
00:28:12.119 --> 00:28:14.079
how's everything going, how's the family? But to your point
623
00:28:14.160 --> 00:28:16.720
is these are deeper discussions that you probably don't have
624
00:28:16.759 --> 00:28:18.920
time to talk with your leader about unless you sped
625
00:28:18.960 --> 00:28:21.200
the umber time and say like, can I just ask you,
626
00:28:21.279 --> 00:28:22.839
like how ask you about this?
627
00:28:23.079 --> 00:28:24.359
Ask you about this topic? So was it?
628
00:28:24.680 --> 00:28:27.920
Yes, it's definitely a different topic, which I think a
629
00:28:27.960 --> 00:28:30.559
lot of these podcasts are very very helpful, just talk
630
00:28:30.599 --> 00:28:33.599
to different leaders and executive leaders, to the c suite,
631
00:28:33.640 --> 00:28:37.200
senior leaders, you know, managers. I think that's why these
632
00:28:37.200 --> 00:28:39.440
are helpful, just to hear from the people in the weed,
633
00:28:39.519 --> 00:28:41.319
to hear from the little leaders about how they think.
634
00:28:41.160 --> 00:28:42.119
About these things.
635
00:28:42.759 --> 00:28:44.920
I think so too, because it helps build empathy.
636
00:28:44.960 --> 00:28:47.279
Because an analyst, when you're when you've got like this
637
00:28:47.359 --> 00:28:49.759
big black box, you just can't see what's happening on
638
00:28:49.759 --> 00:28:53.200
the other side, it's so easy to fill in those gaps.
639
00:28:52.880 --> 00:28:53.799
With your own narrative.
640
00:28:54.119 --> 00:28:56.359
Yeah, and it feels it feels so right, but it's
641
00:28:56.400 --> 00:28:59.240
not because you're just you're actually missing quite a bit
642
00:28:59.319 --> 00:29:01.920
that's happening. And even if you know, let's say you
643
00:29:01.960 --> 00:29:04.119
have an idea and you present it to your manager
644
00:29:04.240 --> 00:29:06.599
or with the director, and you know they're saying, this
645
00:29:06.640 --> 00:29:08.720
is a good idea, but not right now. You could
646
00:29:08.759 --> 00:29:11.079
fill that in with your own story or they may
647
00:29:11.160 --> 00:29:14.720
genuinely like it. There's just not enough resources, the timing's
648
00:29:14.799 --> 00:29:17.119
not right, it doesn't align with the goals, whatever that
649
00:29:17.200 --> 00:29:17.480
may be.
650
00:29:18.680 --> 00:29:23.480
Yeah, and I think that's the clarity question of like
651
00:29:23.559 --> 00:29:25.839
just confirm it, because I think to your point, in
652
00:29:25.920 --> 00:29:28.000
the void, we make up around narratives, around what we
653
00:29:28.039 --> 00:29:30.599
think happened and why it happened. But I think that's
654
00:29:30.599 --> 00:29:31.839
where you have to ask the question. And I think
655
00:29:31.839 --> 00:29:33.880
those are those hard discussions, but I think they're helpful
656
00:29:33.920 --> 00:29:36.079
just to kind of clear it up the narrative because
657
00:29:36.079 --> 00:29:37.759
someone say, hey, I was having a bad day or
658
00:29:38.119 --> 00:29:40.119
I thought we were going this way, they completely changed
659
00:29:40.119 --> 00:29:42.759
the story right before the meetings. I think getting things
660
00:29:42.799 --> 00:29:45.319
documented because the problem I have is sometimes people say, well,
661
00:29:45.359 --> 00:29:47.880
they said this and they said that, and I always say.
662
00:29:47.359 --> 00:29:48.759
Is this documented? Is there an email?
663
00:29:48.839 --> 00:29:50.559
But they're like no, Well, first of all, let's get
664
00:29:50.559 --> 00:29:53.400
this on paper or digital paper, like an email something,
665
00:29:53.759 --> 00:29:55.119
just the way we can share and say I have
666
00:29:55.200 --> 00:29:57.000
it here where you said this, or this happen, or
667
00:29:57.000 --> 00:29:58.079
this project thing you happen.
668
00:29:58.440 --> 00:30:00.519
Let's talk through that. Yeah.
669
00:30:00.519 --> 00:30:03.039
But I think it's just clarity and having just a
670
00:30:03.039 --> 00:30:07.240
lot of discussions. And that's just as much as the
671
00:30:07.279 --> 00:30:10.160
technical work like the coding and building the things are helpful,
672
00:30:10.599 --> 00:30:12.240
you still have to deal with the people themselves to
673
00:30:12.279 --> 00:30:13.799
make sure that you're going on the right path.
674
00:30:14.200 --> 00:30:14.400
Right.
675
00:30:14.559 --> 00:30:17.839
There was another podcast that you had spoken on and
676
00:30:17.880 --> 00:30:20.759
you mentioned the player coach model. Would you mind sharing
677
00:30:20.759 --> 00:30:23.119
a little bit more about what that What that means.
678
00:30:23.480 --> 00:30:25.440
I've seen that a lot where you have people that
679
00:30:25.480 --> 00:30:28.200
were promoted to like a manager position, but when they
680
00:30:28.240 --> 00:30:31.839
were promoted, they didn't they didn't give their work to
681
00:30:31.839 --> 00:30:34.000
anyone else. They're still doing the work they did before,
682
00:30:34.000 --> 00:30:37.000
but now they're a manager. But that's very difficult because
683
00:30:37.160 --> 00:30:39.039
I normally have to be in the ways doing this stuff.
684
00:30:39.079 --> 00:30:41.440
I have to also lead the team, but it's very
685
00:30:41.440 --> 00:30:45.319
difficult to like lead the team. You don't really have
686
00:30:45.400 --> 00:30:48.079
much time to think about strategy or resourcing because you're
687
00:30:48.119 --> 00:30:50.400
so busy. So I know a lot of people do
688
00:30:50.480 --> 00:30:52.599
that because it seems like a cheaper out just because
689
00:30:52.599 --> 00:30:53.960
oh I can, like I can pay them to be
690
00:30:54.000 --> 00:30:55.839
a manager, but I can also do that stuff too.
691
00:30:55.920 --> 00:30:58.960
But it's very difficult to kind of do both very
692
00:30:59.000 --> 00:31:03.079
well because then you're your haphazard coder or haphazard analytic,
693
00:31:03.079 --> 00:31:04.960
but you're also a haphazard manager. So you're kind of
694
00:31:05.000 --> 00:31:07.359
like part time, Like you're doing like part time with
695
00:31:07.440 --> 00:31:10.200
each of them. But then it feels like if you
696
00:31:10.200 --> 00:31:11.799
pay people, if you do things part time, you get
697
00:31:11.799 --> 00:31:15.839
part time results. So it's a difficult model to be
698
00:31:15.960 --> 00:31:16.920
very successful at.
699
00:31:17.720 --> 00:31:19.519
It sounds kind of like You've got one foot in,
700
00:31:19.640 --> 00:31:22.480
one foot out, Aaron. You've shared so much about like
701
00:31:22.519 --> 00:31:25.680
your work experience. Before we wrap up this conversation, I
702
00:31:25.720 --> 00:31:27.799
was hoping to learn a little bit more about the
703
00:31:27.920 --> 00:31:29.759
data and the d community that you created.
704
00:31:30.119 --> 00:31:32.039
Every single month, we kind of have these happy hour
705
00:31:32.079 --> 00:31:34.519
and we just have one last night, which is why
706
00:31:34.559 --> 00:31:36.920
I came home late. My daughter drew a picture. So
707
00:31:37.079 --> 00:31:39.039
every single month we go to a different bar and
708
00:31:39.079 --> 00:31:41.240
restaurant in the area. So very simple. So we don't
709
00:31:41.279 --> 00:31:43.359
charge anything, so it was a free event. We don't
710
00:31:43.400 --> 00:31:46.640
have any speakers, no sponsors, and no sales, so you
711
00:31:46.720 --> 00:31:49.240
just show up, you talk shop with some people that
712
00:31:49.319 --> 00:31:52.920
they're in the same industry, then you go home. So
713
00:31:52.920 --> 00:31:54.720
you do them every single month. We started this in
714
00:31:54.799 --> 00:31:57.039
June twenty twenty four. We've been doing it for the
715
00:31:57.079 --> 00:32:00.440
past year and a half. Been very successful. We realize
716
00:32:00.480 --> 00:32:03.039
a lot of our people, of our community members wanted more,
717
00:32:03.119 --> 00:32:06.480
so we did a conference. We actually ended up selling out.
718
00:32:06.559 --> 00:32:08.599
So it's one of the things where we're like, we're
719
00:32:08.599 --> 00:32:10.799
all volunteers. We don't do it full time. It's a
720
00:32:10.799 --> 00:32:13.519
part time gig. After work. I talked with my peers
721
00:32:13.559 --> 00:32:15.519
to figure out what they're working on. So it's been
722
00:32:16.000 --> 00:32:18.200
growing very organic that like people tell each other about
723
00:32:18.200 --> 00:32:20.400
it to hear about it. So it's just been a
724
00:32:20.400 --> 00:32:23.799
great experience, just because Detroit has a very vast and
725
00:32:23.920 --> 00:32:28.240
diverse businesses, so it's good for people with like people
726
00:32:28.240 --> 00:32:30.039
in the food inutry. You can talk to automotive, they
727
00:32:30.079 --> 00:32:32.279
can talk to healthcare, they can talk to financial services.
728
00:32:32.319 --> 00:32:34.480
So it's just been a great way for the local
729
00:32:34.559 --> 00:32:38.200
data community to get together and just have good discussions,
730
00:32:38.240 --> 00:32:42.319
meet people connect because I think after COVID, everyone's working
731
00:32:42.359 --> 00:32:43.960
remote now, so people want to meet people in the
732
00:32:44.000 --> 00:32:44.440
real world.
733
00:32:44.559 --> 00:32:47.559
Well, I'm sure it's incredibly valuable for the community, so
734
00:32:47.839 --> 00:32:50.559
I'm really thrilled that it exists out in the world
735
00:32:50.559 --> 00:32:53.559
and that people are attending. Erin, thank you again so
736
00:32:53.680 --> 00:32:56.319
much for joining this podcast. It really was a pleasure
737
00:32:56.759 --> 00:32:59.559
getting to know you and your leadership and your story.
738
00:33:00.200 --> 00:33:03.720
For anyone who's listening, I will also be posting Aaron's
739
00:33:03.759 --> 00:33:06.359
link to his LinkedIn in the description so that you
740
00:33:06.400 --> 00:33:10.079
can follow him and learn more about what he's up to.
741
00:33:10.400 --> 00:33:12.640
So thank you again, Erin. It really was such a
742
00:33:12.640 --> 00:33:13.799
pleasure having you on the show.
743
00:33:14.200 --> 00:33:16.519
Yes, thanks for having me time flew by quickly, so
744
00:33:16.519 --> 00:33:18.640
these are all fun discussion. Like you mentioned, get I
745
00:33:18.680 --> 00:33:20.680
don't get to talk about a lot of these things
746
00:33:20.720 --> 00:33:22.279
in just the day to day because you so focus
747
00:33:22.440 --> 00:33:26.400
on like the projects and the company. So these are good, fun,
748
00:33:26.680 --> 00:33:29.359
free willing kind of discussions to have. It is how
749
00:33:29.400 --> 00:33:31.039
you learn, is how you continue to grow as having
750
00:33:31.119 --> 00:33:31.839
dialog like this.
751
00:33:32.200 --> 00:33:35.960
So thank you, Thank you for listening to the quietly
752
00:33:36.039 --> 00:33:40.160
ambitious Analyst. If today's episode helped you see data in
753
00:33:40.200 --> 00:33:43.319
a new way, share it with someone who'd appreciate it too,
754
00:33:43.799 --> 00:33:47.279
and follow the show for more lessons on business communication
755
00:33:47.599 --> 00:33:51.119
and driving impact with data. And if you found it helpful,
756
00:33:51.319 --> 00:33:54.599
leaving a quick review really helps this podcast reach more
757
00:33:54.680 --> 00:33:57.079
people who want to grow in the same way. Until
758
00:33:57.160 --> 00:33:59.759
next time, focus only on what you can control and
759
00:33:59.759 --> 00:34:01.920
star drive to be one percent better each day.
1
00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:04.320
Welcome to The Quietly Ambitious Analyst, a podcast about data,
2
00:00:04.360 --> 00:00:08.119
communication and business. I'm Seth Forbes, and in each episode
3
00:00:08.240 --> 00:00:12.400
will unpack what it really takes to influence decisions with data,
4
00:00:12.439 --> 00:00:17.160
from framing business problems to communicating insights with confidence. Because
5
00:00:17.239 --> 00:00:27.839
data alone doesn't drive change, people do. Welcome back everyone
6
00:00:27.920 --> 00:00:32.479
to another episode of The Quietly Ambitious Analyst podcast. Today
7
00:00:32.600 --> 00:00:35.920
we have Aaron Wilkerson who has over eighteen years of
8
00:00:35.960 --> 00:00:40.280
experience in data and analytics. He specializes in building and
9
00:00:40.359 --> 00:00:44.320
driving data strategies that help companies leverage their data assets.
10
00:00:44.840 --> 00:00:48.240
Aaron lives in Livonia, Michigan, with his wife and their
11
00:00:48.280 --> 00:00:51.479
five children. So Erin, thank you so much for joining
12
00:00:51.520 --> 00:00:53.560
the podcast. It's a pleasure to have you here today.
13
00:00:54.000 --> 00:00:55.719
Absolutely, thank you, Seth for having me.
14
00:00:56.240 --> 00:00:59.320
I would love to kind of get into your own,
15
00:00:59.520 --> 00:01:02.560
I guess career journey and kind of reflecting on what
16
00:01:02.600 --> 00:01:06.239
you've learned over the years. What is the driving force
17
00:01:06.359 --> 00:01:08.519
for you as a data professional.
18
00:01:09.359 --> 00:01:13.680
I think it's just a natural curiosity, always looking to
19
00:01:14.280 --> 00:01:17.000
problem solve and figure things out. And so that's what
20
00:01:17.239 --> 00:01:19.040
things I do like about our field is we do
21
00:01:19.519 --> 00:01:23.079
work across many different business functions. There's also interesting problems
22
00:01:23.079 --> 00:01:27.079
because new technology stacks, you have, different stakeholders come in
23
00:01:27.079 --> 00:01:32.120
into play. There's always new and latest tools. So at
24
00:01:32.120 --> 00:01:34.079
one point cloud was a big thing, you know, almost
25
00:01:34.120 --> 00:01:37.439
twenty years ago, and then you got data minorization with
26
00:01:37.519 --> 00:01:39.359
lake House and data bricks and all that, and now
27
00:01:39.400 --> 00:01:39.959
you have AI.
28
00:01:40.760 --> 00:01:42.599
So I'll say there's.
29
00:01:42.439 --> 00:01:44.959
Never a dull moment, and everything changes, but it's always
30
00:01:45.000 --> 00:01:48.920
interesting problems to solve and service to the business, you know,
31
00:01:49.079 --> 00:01:52.680
just always trying to give them interesting, interesting things that
32
00:01:52.680 --> 00:01:56.519
they need to make decisions and figure out the best
33
00:01:56.519 --> 00:01:57.760
course of action for the business.
34
00:01:57.799 --> 00:02:00.719
So I love that you're saying curiosity is driving factor.
35
00:02:00.879 --> 00:02:03.599
I am also curious when you were a kid, were
36
00:02:03.640 --> 00:02:07.280
there any traits that you kind of look back now
37
00:02:07.359 --> 00:02:09.439
and you're like, oh, that makes sense now that I'm
38
00:02:09.479 --> 00:02:09.840
in data.
39
00:02:11.639 --> 00:02:15.479
Yeah, probably analytical thinking, you know, like taking things apart.
40
00:02:15.800 --> 00:02:20.159
We're curious about curiosity about how things work, and you know,
41
00:02:20.159 --> 00:02:23.159
trying to figure out things, you know, taking taking apart
42
00:02:23.439 --> 00:02:27.199
toys and remote controls and things like that, just natural curiosity.
43
00:02:27.199 --> 00:02:29.400
Because I do think that this is a field.
44
00:02:29.120 --> 00:02:33.879
Where there are no kind of right answers, is very
45
00:02:33.919 --> 00:02:37.120
kind of solution driven. Analytical there's no set step of
46
00:02:37.159 --> 00:02:39.080
go like from step as that B. There are some
47
00:02:39.520 --> 00:02:41.280
things you need to figure out, especially with leadership, like
48
00:02:41.319 --> 00:02:43.960
as I've taken on leadership the past ten years. That's
49
00:02:44.080 --> 00:02:47.599
it's a whole entirely different new challenge. But I think
50
00:02:47.680 --> 00:02:53.400
kind of kind of that like curiosity, ethical thinking, problem solving.
51
00:02:54.639 --> 00:02:57.000
You know, I really like math. I was good at math.
52
00:02:57.039 --> 00:02:59.599
You know, math has kind of natural stepping points around
53
00:02:59.639 --> 00:03:02.000
how to use all problems on how do you figure
54
00:03:02.039 --> 00:03:06.000
things out? Yes, I mean like data was kind of
55
00:03:06.039 --> 00:03:07.479
a career I just kind of fell upon. It wasn't
56
00:03:07.479 --> 00:03:09.879
like a childhood dream of you know, becoming you know,
57
00:03:10.080 --> 00:03:11.520
a data leader, like I think at that point I
58
00:03:11.520 --> 00:03:13.719
didn't even know what data was, whereas most people didn't
59
00:03:13.759 --> 00:03:15.800
know what that was. So I think it just kind
60
00:03:15.800 --> 00:03:18.879
of just curiosity and just gotten lucky getting into this
61
00:03:18.919 --> 00:03:20.560
field of being they able to stay for so long.
62
00:03:21.360 --> 00:03:23.919
You were saying that in data, there's really no such
63
00:03:24.000 --> 00:03:25.280
thing as a right answer.
64
00:03:25.400 --> 00:03:27.479
Can would you mind expanding on that a little bit more?
65
00:03:29.599 --> 00:03:30.360
Yeah, it's.
66
00:03:31.919 --> 00:03:35.120
Because it kind of all depends on the context of.
67
00:03:36.759 --> 00:03:39.759
What you're trying to do. So if someone says to.
68
00:03:39.719 --> 00:03:42.400
You, you know, I'm like we were inundated with tools
69
00:03:42.840 --> 00:03:45.280
and that you know in our in the work that
70
00:03:45.280 --> 00:03:47.560
we do. So it's kind of like these things could work.
71
00:03:47.599 --> 00:03:49.240
So it's kind of like does it work for your business?
72
00:03:49.240 --> 00:03:52.240
You know, you always have budget constraints, you know, a leader,
73
00:03:52.280 --> 00:03:55.159
you have team composition, like if you have an account,
74
00:03:55.199 --> 00:03:56.639
what do you do with that? From a team, like
75
00:03:56.639 --> 00:03:59.319
what's the best use of resources for the company. So
76
00:03:59.400 --> 00:04:02.120
it's it's like trying to figure out approach and selling
77
00:04:02.120 --> 00:04:04.319
people on that approach of Hey, this is what we built.
78
00:04:04.360 --> 00:04:07.360
And you know, there's different data models, like there's a
79
00:04:07.439 --> 00:04:10.000
data you can do, a relational data model, there's dimensional
80
00:04:10.080 --> 00:04:12.560
data models. There's graphs that we have too, So how
81
00:04:12.560 --> 00:04:15.080
do you and choose that? So there's there's a lot
82
00:04:15.080 --> 00:04:17.680
of different choices. There's no set like this is the
83
00:04:17.720 --> 00:04:21.040
one way to do it. There's variability and different different
84
00:04:21.079 --> 00:04:24.160
ways to come to a solution and having to stand
85
00:04:24.160 --> 00:04:25.600
by that and say I think this is the best
86
00:04:25.680 --> 00:04:26.240
course of action.
87
00:04:27.000 --> 00:04:28.920
You know, that makes a lot of sense and I
88
00:04:28.959 --> 00:04:30.279
have experienced that as well.
89
00:04:30.480 --> 00:04:31.759
Just being a data analyst.
90
00:04:31.839 --> 00:04:34.839
One analyst could find an insight that is slightly different
91
00:04:34.959 --> 00:04:37.600
from an insight that another data analyst may find if
92
00:04:37.600 --> 00:04:40.800
they're looking at the same data set, or what stands
93
00:04:40.800 --> 00:04:43.480
out to one person may look different for another. And
94
00:04:43.519 --> 00:04:45.920
then on top of that, like structuring the story and
95
00:04:45.920 --> 00:04:48.399
the way that you present it to stakeholders, you know,
96
00:04:48.560 --> 00:04:51.720
could be variable depending on who it is that you're
97
00:04:51.720 --> 00:04:53.399
working with and what they care about.
98
00:04:54.680 --> 00:05:00.680
Yes, exactly, especially open into questions like you know, what's
99
00:05:00.720 --> 00:05:03.399
the reason this happened or why did this happen? Or
100
00:05:03.439 --> 00:05:07.160
what do we think's going to happen? Or what would
101
00:05:07.240 --> 00:05:12.160
you recommend? Like those are all those open ended questions
102
00:05:12.199 --> 00:05:14.839
that make you challenge. Especially when you're young your career,
103
00:05:14.839 --> 00:05:18.720
you kind of you challenge yourself like okay, well what's
104
00:05:18.720 --> 00:05:21.439
the best I don't know? Or who can I ask?
105
00:05:21.560 --> 00:05:23.600
Or who's the best person to check with? Or if
106
00:05:23.639 --> 00:05:25.439
you're a team on one person, like you really are
107
00:05:25.680 --> 00:05:27.360
kind of thinking like okay, who I need who do
108
00:05:27.360 --> 00:05:30.160
I need to validate this with? But definitely, you know,
109
00:05:30.199 --> 00:05:33.360
it's the way you go to school. There's straight answers, right,
110
00:05:33.360 --> 00:05:37.240
it's fine, solve for X equels to you're trying to
111
00:05:37.240 --> 00:05:40.360
solve for that, or you're a science class you're trying
112
00:05:40.399 --> 00:05:43.000
to do some chemistry problems. So there's very straight forward
113
00:05:43.040 --> 00:05:46.160
answers when you're in school, but as you evolved, you
114
00:05:46.199 --> 00:05:50.000
realize that it always is, it depends, it depends, it depends.
115
00:05:50.079 --> 00:05:52.560
So definitely it's a you know, a difference in like
116
00:05:52.600 --> 00:05:54.839
formal education versus once you get into the real world.
117
00:05:55.639 --> 00:05:58.319
Tell us about kind of where you're at in your
118
00:05:58.319 --> 00:06:01.360
career right now, because you've been in this field for
119
00:06:01.399 --> 00:06:01.879
some time.
120
00:06:02.439 --> 00:06:05.199
Yes, yeah, it's kind of a it's a it's a
121
00:06:05.240 --> 00:06:08.600
mixed bag. I don't want to have started my career
122
00:06:08.639 --> 00:06:13.360
as more individual contributor, kind of back in business intelligence
123
00:06:13.399 --> 00:06:18.879
reporting administrators, so more technical platform base, and then I
124
00:06:18.879 --> 00:06:23.160
got some opportunities to work in ETL so database development,
125
00:06:23.560 --> 00:06:26.279
and then I got into leadership. So I've been in
126
00:06:26.399 --> 00:06:29.680
leadership for about going on twelve years now, so it
127
00:06:29.720 --> 00:06:33.360
is in the twenty fourteen different levels leadership, so kind
128
00:06:33.360 --> 00:06:36.560
of a manager, senior manager, now in a.
129
00:06:36.800 --> 00:06:37.680
In a director role.
130
00:06:37.800 --> 00:06:41.360
So now in kind of the senior leadership realm of
131
00:06:41.399 --> 00:06:44.560
how do you create like sense, we take a team,
132
00:06:44.680 --> 00:06:48.160
create a strategy, leverage that strategy to benefit the business.
133
00:06:48.199 --> 00:06:50.240
Get to sell ideas. You have to sell strategy.
134
00:06:50.759 --> 00:06:53.160
You have to connect the business to your team to
135
00:06:53.160 --> 00:06:55.120
figure out Okay, the business is struggling with this, how
136
00:06:55.160 --> 00:06:57.879
does our team best help with that? So I'll say
137
00:06:57.920 --> 00:06:59.399
that's a day to day But also on the side,
138
00:06:59.480 --> 00:07:02.879
I do lot of networking. So I co founded a
139
00:07:02.959 --> 00:07:06.120
local data networking group called Data and the D. The
140
00:07:06.160 --> 00:07:08.199
industry keeps changing. Now we're talking about this thing called
141
00:07:08.199 --> 00:07:09.759
AI and a lot of us are figuring that out.
142
00:07:09.800 --> 00:07:11.800
So I think that's the new part of my career
143
00:07:11.879 --> 00:07:14.920
is kind of the networking part of being interesting people learning,
144
00:07:15.040 --> 00:07:19.560
asking questions and just trying to vet things out and
145
00:07:19.639 --> 00:07:22.920
kind of even course correct and challenge myself on things
146
00:07:23.199 --> 00:07:26.639
because I realized is now, once you work in a
147
00:07:26.680 --> 00:07:28.959
company for a long time, you have a set way
148
00:07:28.959 --> 00:07:31.160
of thinking about things, but kind of talking to other
149
00:07:31.199 --> 00:07:34.600
people and writing things on LinkedIn and having DM conversations
150
00:07:34.680 --> 00:07:37.279
or things like this or conferences, those really do challenge
151
00:07:37.319 --> 00:07:39.759
you're thinking, help you think about there may be different
152
00:07:39.800 --> 00:07:40.600
ways to do things.
153
00:07:40.600 --> 00:07:42.240
How can we do this at our company?
154
00:07:42.439 --> 00:07:46.199
So yeah, say kind of leadership and thought leadership and
155
00:07:46.240 --> 00:07:48.839
networking are kind of the current phase of my career.
156
00:07:49.839 --> 00:07:53.399
You've really built up an incredible career for yourself. You're
157
00:07:53.439 --> 00:07:56.199
a director. Now, how long have you been at Carhart.
158
00:07:57.279 --> 00:07:57.839
Three and a half.
159
00:07:57.839 --> 00:08:02.800
Years, so number of twenty twenty two, so it's in
160
00:08:02.839 --> 00:08:05.560
about three and a half years, which is time flies
161
00:08:05.600 --> 00:08:06.040
for sure.
162
00:08:06.800 --> 00:08:08.920
I think it's amazing that you also built up this
163
00:08:08.959 --> 00:08:13.439
community for yourself. And I also read an article about
164
00:08:13.439 --> 00:08:15.040
this the other day. I wish I could figure out
165
00:08:15.079 --> 00:08:17.560
where it was, but they were saying that once you're
166
00:08:17.560 --> 00:08:20.240
in a role for a certain number of years, eventually
167
00:08:20.279 --> 00:08:22.920
you kind of stop learning new things and then you
168
00:08:23.680 --> 00:08:27.079
become as knowledgeable as a new person who is entering
169
00:08:27.879 --> 00:08:29.920
the role. And that just kind of blew my mind
170
00:08:29.959 --> 00:08:32.879
of just how important it is to be continuing to
171
00:08:32.879 --> 00:08:35.679
put yourself out there, speak with people, get new ideas,
172
00:08:35.919 --> 00:08:36.679
and that kind of thing.
173
00:08:37.360 --> 00:08:39.480
Yeah, because a lot of that is, you know, we're human,
174
00:08:39.600 --> 00:08:42.639
so I may have a skill set, so I go
175
00:08:42.679 --> 00:08:46.080
into a company, I have ideas, and because also companies
176
00:08:46.120 --> 00:08:47.960
will only let you allow you to do certain things,
177
00:08:47.960 --> 00:08:49.720
so I may have a way I want to do things,
178
00:08:49.720 --> 00:08:52.679
but you're also kind of limited to either a tech
179
00:08:52.679 --> 00:08:55.960
stack or change management can be tough with the company,
180
00:08:56.000 --> 00:08:58.039
depending what business you work with. So you kind of
181
00:08:58.039 --> 00:09:00.279
get to that comfortable phase where you feel very comfortable. Right, Hey,
182
00:09:00.320 --> 00:09:01.960
I know that I know my daily job is going
183
00:09:02.000 --> 00:09:04.240
to be I know the kind of the things I
184
00:09:04.279 --> 00:09:06.639
want to work on that may change a little bit,
185
00:09:06.639 --> 00:09:08.120
but you do kind of get a little bit comfortable
186
00:09:08.120 --> 00:09:10.320
after a couple of years, and then that's where I
187
00:09:10.320 --> 00:09:12.799
think you need to you need those outside forces to
188
00:09:12.919 --> 00:09:15.600
challenge you because I found out you get too complacent
189
00:09:15.720 --> 00:09:17.559
because I think about the company has always changed, the
190
00:09:17.559 --> 00:09:20.759
company and the business always moving. So if you become stagnant,
191
00:09:20.759 --> 00:09:22.960
then you become a liability or bottleneck for the company.
192
00:09:23.039 --> 00:09:25.960
And as you're seeing through like LinkedIn and different things
193
00:09:25.960 --> 00:09:28.840
out there, like people are losing their jobs because the company.
194
00:09:28.840 --> 00:09:30.759
You're like, what do we doing my AI, how are
195
00:09:30.759 --> 00:09:31.600
we moving our company for?
196
00:09:31.679 --> 00:09:33.120
But if you're saying, well, we're doing the exact same
197
00:09:33.159 --> 00:09:35.759
thing we did years ago, I think it's not like
198
00:09:36.000 --> 00:09:38.960
those things don't fly. Companies are looking to improve. You
199
00:09:39.000 --> 00:09:40.960
have new leadership that comes in all the time and
200
00:09:41.000 --> 00:09:44.000
they want new ideas. So making sure they have new
201
00:09:44.000 --> 00:09:47.720
ideas and not saying stagnant I think is a huge career.
202
00:09:49.240 --> 00:09:50.399
Lesson. I would get it to people.
203
00:09:50.480 --> 00:09:52.480
Just making sure that you're saying on top of things
204
00:09:52.480 --> 00:09:54.559
because you're if you're leader comes to you and say
205
00:09:54.559 --> 00:09:55.799
well this AI thing you said, well, I don't know,
206
00:09:55.799 --> 00:09:58.200
I've never heard of it. Like, that's not a good answer. You,
207
00:09:58.240 --> 00:10:00.240
like all of us, need to be prepared to talk
208
00:10:00.279 --> 00:10:02.600
about what's going on and why. You may think that
209
00:10:02.639 --> 00:10:05.559
it's not the best suitable plan for the company right now.
210
00:10:05.919 --> 00:10:07.559
You need to defend that and say, well, based off
211
00:10:07.600 --> 00:10:10.279
these things, I don't think that we should go this route. However,
212
00:10:11.000 --> 00:10:13.320
to make improvements, we should go this route instead. But
213
00:10:13.440 --> 00:10:15.320
just saying well I'm not hired to do that or
214
00:10:15.360 --> 00:10:18.080
I just do this, it's not going to serve you
215
00:10:18.080 --> 00:10:19.279
well long term.
216
00:10:19.759 --> 00:10:25.000
Do you feel like companies are like creating space for innovation?
217
00:10:25.360 --> 00:10:25.600
Yeah.
218
00:10:25.799 --> 00:10:27.519
I think part of that is figuring out the DNA
219
00:10:27.840 --> 00:10:30.240
right for Carhart, I think we stick true to our
220
00:10:30.240 --> 00:10:33.080
mission statement, but there's ways to be innovative around that,
221
00:10:33.519 --> 00:10:35.440
And a lot of the innovation is is from the
222
00:10:35.480 --> 00:10:37.840
team members. It's bringing ideas to your leader. I think
223
00:10:37.879 --> 00:10:41.559
there's a cultural aspect of it, but I think it's hard.
224
00:10:41.799 --> 00:10:44.240
People don't really say no, it's really just no one
225
00:10:44.240 --> 00:10:46.279
has brought up the idea for us. So I would
226
00:10:46.320 --> 00:10:48.559
say to the listeners it's you know, if you have ideas,
227
00:10:48.919 --> 00:10:50.799
bring them to your leader, but not just an idea,
228
00:10:50.840 --> 00:10:53.080
but it's a full Okay, I think we should do
229
00:10:53.120 --> 00:10:54.759
this for these reasons.
230
00:10:54.879 --> 00:10:55.840
Here should be involved that.
231
00:10:55.919 --> 00:10:57.559
So I think it's a hey, I think we should
232
00:10:57.559 --> 00:10:59.919
move to this platform for these reasons. It'll cost this,
233
00:11:00.039 --> 00:11:03.240
but I think having ideas because sometimes innovation people think
234
00:11:03.279 --> 00:11:04.679
is just like I just the ideas at the wall.
235
00:11:04.759 --> 00:11:07.399
But I think it's fully like, what is the idea,
236
00:11:07.440 --> 00:11:09.600
Why is it beneficial? Why should we go this route
237
00:11:09.679 --> 00:11:12.120
has a couple of benefit from it. I think innovation
238
00:11:12.240 --> 00:11:15.399
is there, but it's you have to be the champion
239
00:11:15.399 --> 00:11:17.559
of that. If you're just waiting for your leader to
240
00:11:17.600 --> 00:11:19.759
spark innovation, I think that's not I mean, sure your
241
00:11:19.799 --> 00:11:22.320
leaders should be doing that, but in the event they're not,
242
00:11:22.399 --> 00:11:24.799
then you should be the person that just brings ideas
243
00:11:24.840 --> 00:11:28.159
and kind of identify different opportunities. I mean, it's also
244
00:11:28.159 --> 00:11:30.559
a way to advance your career. Is kind of helping to.
245
00:11:32.759 --> 00:11:35.080
Occurs change and kind of be a change agent.
246
00:11:36.559 --> 00:11:38.159
Makes it a lot easier for someone to make a
247
00:11:38.240 --> 00:11:39.799
choice when they've got more context.
248
00:11:40.080 --> 00:11:41.559
Yeah, I mean I think about in your friend group.
249
00:11:41.559 --> 00:11:44.440
I using an analogy of imagining your friend chat. Someone
250
00:11:44.519 --> 00:11:46.440
just says Hey, guys, we should we should go out
251
00:11:46.480 --> 00:11:49.240
to dinner, and everyone says we should, but what does
252
00:11:49.279 --> 00:11:52.360
that mean? What you really want to see someone say
253
00:11:52.440 --> 00:11:55.480
is hey, we should go out to you know, Narrobread
254
00:11:55.879 --> 00:11:58.120
on Friday at six o'clock.
255
00:11:58.279 --> 00:12:00.840
For like, it's the.
256
00:12:00.120 --> 00:12:02.399
Actual laying out the idea versuses we should out to dinner,
257
00:12:02.440 --> 00:12:03.720
or we should go see a concert, or to go
258
00:12:03.720 --> 00:12:04.200
see a movie.
259
00:12:04.279 --> 00:12:06.519
Okay, which movie? What night? Like?
260
00:12:06.600 --> 00:12:09.360
So I think that's the difference between just throwing out
261
00:12:09.440 --> 00:12:11.639
ideas versus truly let being like, hey, let's actually do
262
00:12:11.720 --> 00:12:14.559
something new that we haven't done in a while, or
263
00:12:14.879 --> 00:12:18.320
trying to encourage interactions. It's a full idea versus just
264
00:12:18.639 --> 00:12:21.639
an abstract concept of this thing. You're like, Okay, that's
265
00:12:21.639 --> 00:12:25.799
not gonna happen, even for us. I mean for my
266
00:12:26.200 --> 00:12:28.960
networking group. We had a conference. So we did our
267
00:12:29.000 --> 00:12:32.000
first ever conference last year November. That start off as
268
00:12:32.080 --> 00:12:34.720
just an idea in March of we should do a conference,
269
00:12:34.720 --> 00:12:36.720
and then it was a Okay, people thought it was
270
00:12:36.720 --> 00:12:38.919
a good idea. So let's get an event planner, let's
271
00:12:38.960 --> 00:12:42.000
figure out speakers, we need to put together a sponsor package,
272
00:12:42.320 --> 00:12:44.440
we need to secure a venue, we need to open
273
00:12:44.519 --> 00:12:45.360
up a bank account.
274
00:12:45.360 --> 00:12:47.039
So I think I think it's good.
275
00:12:47.159 --> 00:12:49.159
It's good to have ideas, but then it's say, Okay,
276
00:12:49.200 --> 00:12:51.919
who's taking the next steps to move this forward and
277
00:12:52.000 --> 00:12:54.200
kind of make it something. So I think it's part
278
00:12:54.200 --> 00:12:56.320
of innovation that I think people lose sight on is
279
00:12:56.360 --> 00:12:58.200
just you have to continue to make steps on the
280
00:12:58.279 --> 00:13:00.799
day by day basis, is not to starting an idea
281
00:13:00.799 --> 00:13:02.879
and just hoping that you know something's going to work out.
282
00:13:03.919 --> 00:13:06.080
I have felt it before where it's like you've got
283
00:13:06.080 --> 00:13:08.799
really smart people with great ideas and they want to
284
00:13:08.799 --> 00:13:11.440
implement something, but they just they don't really know how
285
00:13:11.440 --> 00:13:12.840
to take that across the finish line.
286
00:13:12.879 --> 00:13:16.240
The tricky part is about to share those stories. So
287
00:13:16.440 --> 00:13:18.159
in many cases, I think people are doing things, but
288
00:13:18.200 --> 00:13:20.679
it's kind of hidden behind closed doors. They don't hear
289
00:13:20.720 --> 00:13:23.200
about it. So I think I'm definitely a current people
290
00:13:23.200 --> 00:13:25.080
to kind of share what they're doing. But I'll say,
291
00:13:25.080 --> 00:13:30.039
you know, platforms, architecture, you know, AI is really changing
292
00:13:30.080 --> 00:13:31.799
a lot of things in terms of you hearing about
293
00:13:31.840 --> 00:13:34.639
pair programming, So I'm I don't think AI is going
294
00:13:34.720 --> 00:13:38.720
to replace programmers, but I have heard things about AI
295
00:13:39.120 --> 00:13:41.240
being able to help out with that. You know eighty
296
00:13:41.279 --> 00:13:43.759
twenty rule where they can do eighty percent. You can
297
00:13:43.799 --> 00:13:46.120
do the tweaking of it, but then you use your
298
00:13:46.320 --> 00:13:48.840
industry knowledge and your specific knowledge actually fill in the
299
00:13:48.879 --> 00:13:51.039
gaps to kind of say, Okay, for card, this is
300
00:13:51.039 --> 00:13:53.159
what that looks like, and or it could do the
301
00:13:53.159 --> 00:13:55.440
twenty percent you do at eighty percent. But I think
302
00:13:55.519 --> 00:13:58.960
that in this new world of AI, there there's definitely
303
00:13:59.000 --> 00:14:02.440
going to be a sense of of expectation of getting
304
00:14:02.480 --> 00:14:05.840
ideas or new concepts or different ways of doing things
305
00:14:06.279 --> 00:14:08.399
versus just this is how we did this before, because
306
00:14:08.399 --> 00:14:10.080
our businesses are starting to ask for it.
307
00:14:11.000 --> 00:14:13.399
With the emergence of AI and all of these different
308
00:14:13.399 --> 00:14:18.559
opportunities that are available. How do you feel like that's changed.
309
00:14:19.240 --> 00:14:21.240
I guess the way that we define what it means
310
00:14:21.279 --> 00:14:22.159
to be data driven.
311
00:14:22.240 --> 00:14:25.320
Think about even with me, I write, I write a
312
00:14:25.519 --> 00:14:28.320
LinkedIn quite a bit. So typically when I post something,
313
00:14:28.360 --> 00:14:30.919
i'll write something I use this tool call it Grammarly.
314
00:14:30.960 --> 00:14:32.679
I'll put it into grammarly to kind of fix all
315
00:14:32.679 --> 00:14:34.759
the grammar changes and things like that, then.
316
00:14:34.679 --> 00:14:36.279
I'll post it. So that's part of my workflow.
317
00:14:36.639 --> 00:14:39.480
So I think we have this new normal where it's
318
00:14:39.960 --> 00:14:41.679
going to be in our workflow to kind of make
319
00:14:41.759 --> 00:14:44.759
us either more efficient we can do things faster or
320
00:14:44.799 --> 00:14:46.480
at a layer quality on top of it where we
321
00:14:46.559 --> 00:14:49.840
didn't have that before. I think it's gonna become the default,
322
00:14:49.919 --> 00:14:51.799
and our businesses are trying to say that too. Okay,
323
00:14:51.840 --> 00:14:53.960
where we use an AI, put some AI and this,
324
00:14:54.039 --> 00:14:56.399
So I think that's where we're it's become the default
325
00:14:56.440 --> 00:14:59.320
of I have a process, but I think about how
326
00:14:59.320 --> 00:15:01.559
do I use it AI to take it to the
327
00:15:01.559 --> 00:15:05.120
next level or amplify that because what I'm doing now
328
00:15:05.360 --> 00:15:07.399
is fine, but I can be better.
329
00:15:07.559 --> 00:15:11.559
Have you seen cases where you're able to identify, like
330
00:15:12.559 --> 00:15:15.080
I don't know whether or not a particular use case
331
00:15:15.080 --> 00:15:18.480
for AI is actually going to be beneficial for the company,
332
00:15:18.559 --> 00:15:22.399
because one of the challenges I've seen is like this
333
00:15:22.559 --> 00:15:27.399
differentiation between we want to implement AI, so let's just
334
00:15:27.639 --> 00:15:30.639
find new solutions to problems that we may not quite
335
00:15:30.720 --> 00:15:33.519
have yet. We're just excited to implement it, versus something
336
00:15:33.519 --> 00:15:35.360
that's actually solving a business problem.
337
00:15:36.320 --> 00:15:40.600
Yes, I think the challenge is that AI is probabilistic,
338
00:15:40.639 --> 00:15:44.360
where especially JENAI, it's using math and science to kind
339
00:15:44.360 --> 00:15:47.320
of think about what's the best sequence of words and
340
00:15:47.360 --> 00:15:49.720
texts and things like that. So in many cases, if
341
00:15:49.720 --> 00:15:51.600
you have a very determined this system where it's a
342
00:15:51.679 --> 00:15:54.840
very straightforward rule set of if this then that, if
343
00:15:54.879 --> 00:15:57.480
that then that, then it's not the best, Like it's
344
00:15:57.519 --> 00:15:59.879
kind of overkill. And I think that's what I always
345
00:16:00.240 --> 00:16:03.759
myself of is sometimes you can use tried and true
346
00:16:03.759 --> 00:16:06.639
methods because they're cheaper, they're world established, more people know
347
00:16:06.679 --> 00:16:08.879
how to use this stuff. So I think, you know,
348
00:16:08.919 --> 00:16:12.799
trying to use AI for everything is a challenge. I think,
349
00:16:12.840 --> 00:16:15.279
you know, you have to look at you have to
350
00:16:15.360 --> 00:16:17.399
justify why you instead of defaulting. Yeah, I think the
351
00:16:17.679 --> 00:16:20.240
better questions, Hey, why do I need AI to do that?
352
00:16:20.480 --> 00:16:22.720
When I can use all these other methods. So maybe
353
00:16:22.720 --> 00:16:25.279
we've been doing workflow, We've been doing business process automation
354
00:16:25.320 --> 00:16:28.480
and workflow rules for you know, for decades now. So
355
00:16:28.879 --> 00:16:32.240
I think people struggle with the best way to use
356
00:16:32.279 --> 00:16:35.240
it because I think it's a difference between like very
357
00:16:35.320 --> 00:16:38.679
rules driven. Like when something's rules driven, AI is not
358
00:16:38.759 --> 00:16:41.519
the best use case for that because you already know,
359
00:16:41.559 --> 00:16:43.919
like you already can put in very simple checks around
360
00:16:43.960 --> 00:16:46.519
what it is. But if like when we talk about
361
00:16:46.519 --> 00:16:49.360
things like marketing copy where it's the language could be different.
362
00:16:49.360 --> 00:16:51.159
It really depends.
363
00:16:52.120 --> 00:16:54.279
Or you're doing kind of process documentation where you're trying
364
00:16:54.320 --> 00:16:56.399
to use language to translate that to that where it
365
00:16:56.399 --> 00:16:58.799
could be you can make those tweaks. So I think
366
00:16:58.799 --> 00:17:00.759
there's many use cases out there. You may have an idea,
367
00:17:00.799 --> 00:17:02.639
but you realize, yeah, AI is not good for that.
368
00:17:02.720 --> 00:17:05.839
It's it's too it's it's it's too simple. It's like
369
00:17:05.880 --> 00:17:07.640
what we're trying to do is is too simple for
370
00:17:07.720 --> 00:17:11.000
air or also, if you think about it, you have
371
00:17:11.039 --> 00:17:13.079
to support this. So all these use cases, if you
372
00:17:13.119 --> 00:17:15.759
implement something, you have to have people involved to keep
373
00:17:15.799 --> 00:17:18.200
it going. What happens when it breaks, Like someone has
374
00:17:18.279 --> 00:17:20.240
to go and figure out what happened. So if you
375
00:17:20.359 --> 00:17:22.839
if you're doing all these all these brand new things,
376
00:17:23.200 --> 00:17:26.519
you need to have a either contractors, consultants or team
377
00:17:26.599 --> 00:17:28.559
that supports that. You can't just implement this and they
378
00:17:28.599 --> 00:17:32.279
run away. Because everything breaks. Everything in your house, everything breaks,
379
00:17:33.000 --> 00:17:34.799
everything breaks, so someone asks to come in here and
380
00:17:34.799 --> 00:17:36.599
fix that. So if you're doing the latest and greatest,
381
00:17:37.079 --> 00:17:38.680
the people that can go in there and like solve
382
00:17:38.720 --> 00:17:40.559
that for you or fix it is very limited. So
383
00:17:41.480 --> 00:17:44.480
definitely a lot of vetting out of use cases. But
384
00:17:44.480 --> 00:17:46.680
it's fair. I would say it's challenging to find true
385
00:17:46.720 --> 00:17:50.960
AI use cases just because you it's not the default.
386
00:17:51.000 --> 00:17:53.440
It's kind of the let's justify why we would use
387
00:17:53.480 --> 00:17:55.079
AD in this case because nothing else works.
388
00:17:55.920 --> 00:17:58.799
When you were mentioning like rules based, I think you
389
00:17:58.839 --> 00:18:01.599
were saying, like AI is not the best for rules.
390
00:18:01.680 --> 00:18:03.000
Can you give a couple examples?
391
00:18:03.960 --> 00:18:06.400
So if I'm doing a workflow, if I'm doing a
392
00:18:06.440 --> 00:18:11.799
process workflow of let's say AP where I get an invoice,
393
00:18:12.319 --> 00:18:15.599
I want to double check, I want to tell I
394
00:18:15.599 --> 00:18:17.400
get an invoice, I have a feel where it has
395
00:18:17.440 --> 00:18:20.680
the vendor, I verify the spending limits, I set up
396
00:18:20.680 --> 00:18:22.640
an approver, and I pay the invoice.
397
00:18:22.799 --> 00:18:23.960
Like, that's a very specific rules.
398
00:18:24.160 --> 00:18:26.720
I know that when this happens, do this, check this
399
00:18:26.920 --> 00:18:29.000
value with that, and it goes to the next step
400
00:18:29.000 --> 00:18:31.000
and the next step. So in that situation, if you
401
00:18:31.039 --> 00:18:33.640
have very specific steps that you do the exact same
402
00:18:33.640 --> 00:18:35.720
steps every time, there's no variability.
403
00:18:35.720 --> 00:18:36.799
You're following the same steps.
404
00:18:37.200 --> 00:18:39.599
There's no point of using AI versus just using tried
405
00:18:39.640 --> 00:18:42.680
and true workflows of just a bunch of different boxes
406
00:18:42.680 --> 00:18:45.799
connected in cereal. And then they just kind of go
407
00:18:46.000 --> 00:18:48.839
and they implement the process, So are they putting an
408
00:18:48.880 --> 00:18:50.720
a solution on that? You have to ask the question
409
00:18:50.799 --> 00:18:54.400
of well, what's the value proposite with you know, why
410
00:18:54.400 --> 00:18:56.519
would you use an LM in the situation if it's
411
00:18:56.599 --> 00:18:58.839
just a very simple I don't se sequence stuff.
412
00:18:58.839 --> 00:19:00.000
So that's a lot of the question wrong. Eight.
413
00:19:00.240 --> 00:19:02.759
So a lot of people talking about AI agents, but
414
00:19:02.799 --> 00:19:04.759
you have to think a lot of people think about
415
00:19:04.759 --> 00:19:07.680
walking use agent for that when you realize it's just
416
00:19:07.680 --> 00:19:10.400
a straightforward set of steps really an agent, it's not
417
00:19:10.440 --> 00:19:12.279
going to be very helpful in that scenario.
418
00:19:13.119 --> 00:19:14.839
No, that makes a lot of sense because it's like
419
00:19:14.920 --> 00:19:17.880
what you're describing would be the difference between automation.
420
00:19:17.680 --> 00:19:20.759
Versus craig and like, we've been doing that for a
421
00:19:20.799 --> 00:19:23.079
long time. That's not really AI use case. So I
422
00:19:23.119 --> 00:19:25.319
think a lot of us in the past, probably a
423
00:19:25.319 --> 00:19:27.079
couple of years, are all dealing with that same thing
424
00:19:27.119 --> 00:19:29.279
where we're kind of trying to vet out all these
425
00:19:29.359 --> 00:19:31.720
use cases and people bring things to you, but you're saying,
426
00:19:31.720 --> 00:19:36.279
well that's automation bucket, that's or eliminate that process altogether,
427
00:19:36.640 --> 00:19:40.680
or sometimes it's completely overhauling a process. Let's not even
428
00:19:40.720 --> 00:19:42.640
talk about automation AIA, how about we just get rid
429
00:19:42.640 --> 00:19:44.559
of that, or we need to simplify that in a
430
00:19:44.640 --> 00:19:47.680
much different way. So the good news is that we're
431
00:19:47.680 --> 00:19:50.559
all trying different things, and like we brought up innovation,
432
00:19:50.680 --> 00:19:54.279
it's the The good thing is that the businesses are
433
00:19:54.319 --> 00:19:56.559
thinking about how do we do things differently, how we
434
00:19:56.640 --> 00:20:00.319
use our existing workforce more efficiently, how do we scale
435
00:20:00.400 --> 00:20:02.759
our operations, how do we get the most out of this?
436
00:20:02.920 --> 00:20:05.839
So I think that there's an inspiration or light bulb blup, Hey,
437
00:20:05.880 --> 00:20:08.440
there's better ways to do things. And even if AI
438
00:20:08.559 --> 00:20:10.880
is not the right solution, it's still someone thought to
439
00:20:11.799 --> 00:20:14.000
try something different or they're trying to figure out ways
440
00:20:14.279 --> 00:20:17.119
to make improvements. So I think at least AI has
441
00:20:17.240 --> 00:20:19.640
provided that too. Ethinic society is in terms of a
442
00:20:20.160 --> 00:20:21.920
you know, there may be better ways to do this
443
00:20:22.880 --> 00:20:26.079
or more efficient So and now I'll one more point there.
444
00:20:26.160 --> 00:20:30.319
So I've used AI and for somebody. I have many children.
445
00:20:30.400 --> 00:20:32.759
They all have different school lists. So in August I
446
00:20:32.839 --> 00:20:35.079
get I get the school list from the teachers, but
447
00:20:35.119 --> 00:20:37.599
I have five children, so I get five different school lists,
448
00:20:38.000 --> 00:20:39.240
so I have to put them on, especially cause I'm
449
00:20:39.279 --> 00:20:41.119
only going to shop one time. Not shopping fight different times,
450
00:20:41.160 --> 00:20:43.079
So I think I put in groc where I'd said
451
00:20:43.359 --> 00:20:45.359
I'd say groc or whatever I use at the time.
452
00:20:45.400 --> 00:20:48.720
I said, take these, take these lists, upload.
453
00:20:48.359 --> 00:20:51.559
These, figure out, combine all this list together to make
454
00:20:51.599 --> 00:20:54.440
more big spreadsheet around. They need to buy twenty crayons,
455
00:20:54.480 --> 00:20:57.079
they'd buy ten pencils. So that was a use case
456
00:20:57.119 --> 00:20:59.240
because it would spend me hours trying to look at
457
00:20:59.240 --> 00:21:01.839
every single thing, trying to collapse them all and say,
458
00:21:01.839 --> 00:21:05.680
crayon's there, crayons there. So that was a situation where
459
00:21:06.240 --> 00:21:07.839
it wasn't like a I can't that's not really a
460
00:21:07.880 --> 00:21:09.680
rules strip. It's more like a hey, take this, like
461
00:21:09.720 --> 00:21:14.559
take this, take these different pdf there are different structures,
462
00:21:14.880 --> 00:21:17.000
and try to figure out the language, try to translate
463
00:21:17.039 --> 00:21:20.119
this together to hammondize that. So you know it definitely
464
00:21:20.160 --> 00:21:22.160
that saved me a ton of time, like hours try
465
00:21:22.200 --> 00:21:25.119
to collapse all these school lists. It's a one straightforward
466
00:21:25.119 --> 00:21:28.079
school supply list that I can then go ordering and
467
00:21:28.160 --> 00:21:29.279
get a bunch of school supplies.
468
00:21:29.359 --> 00:21:31.960
It's got such a huge potential to save a lot
469
00:21:32.000 --> 00:21:34.720
of time. The use cases are very interesting. Would you
470
00:21:34.759 --> 00:21:37.440
mind sharing a little bit about the kinds of problems
471
00:21:37.480 --> 00:21:40.920
that you're working dissolve as a director at Carhart.
472
00:21:41.680 --> 00:21:43.519
A lot of it is a lot of his cross
473
00:21:43.519 --> 00:21:47.680
functional nature, just different business units asking for things, but
474
00:21:47.759 --> 00:21:50.720
trying to cut across to figure out how all these
475
00:21:50.720 --> 00:21:53.960
things impact each other and they work together. So supply
476
00:21:54.079 --> 00:21:56.960
chain may get this metric, our customer care teammate get
477
00:21:56.960 --> 00:22:00.240
that metric, and our other teammate it another metric. So
478
00:22:00.240 --> 00:22:03.440
how do I bring all that together to tell the
479
00:22:03.440 --> 00:22:06.359
story about how it impacts the business and overall what
480
00:22:06.400 --> 00:22:07.839
we're trying to do with that. So I don't have
481
00:22:07.960 --> 00:22:09.799
data engineering, I don't have data science, but kind of
482
00:22:09.839 --> 00:22:12.559
everything else falls on me in terms of kind of
483
00:22:12.599 --> 00:22:15.880
your BI and analytics. We have a center of excellence
484
00:22:15.880 --> 00:22:18.000
as well, so sharing with people like you know, we
485
00:22:18.039 --> 00:22:20.279
can't build everything, but also sharing the knowledge of this
486
00:22:20.359 --> 00:22:25.039
is how you would build this into HARBI yourself, because
487
00:22:25.160 --> 00:22:27.119
you know, we can't do everything ourselves, so we do
488
00:22:27.200 --> 00:22:28.759
try to get that out to different users so they
489
00:22:28.759 --> 00:22:31.119
can you know, this is the models we have, This
490
00:22:31.200 --> 00:22:33.720
is how you use that in your own in.
491
00:22:33.680 --> 00:22:34.440
Your own day to day.
492
00:22:34.920 --> 00:22:37.720
How do you work with your analysts to kind of
493
00:22:37.759 --> 00:22:39.440
find the signal amongst the noise.
494
00:22:40.799 --> 00:22:43.240
I mean, prioritization is pretty key.
495
00:22:43.279 --> 00:22:45.759
So we work with our stakeholders pretty closely to figure
496
00:22:45.759 --> 00:22:49.039
out the what's the high priority work for them, because
497
00:22:49.039 --> 00:22:51.119
everyone's going to tell you different stories, like different groups
498
00:22:51.119 --> 00:22:52.400
are going to say this is more important to me,
499
00:22:52.440 --> 00:22:54.519
this is more important to me. So part of it
500
00:22:54.559 --> 00:22:58.160
is just understanding from our stakeholders just what's their top
501
00:22:58.200 --> 00:23:00.119
three or top five. Then try because you know, we
502
00:23:00.160 --> 00:23:03.240
have limited resources, even we can't do everything, so a
503
00:23:03.279 --> 00:23:05.480
lot of that is just trying to a lot of
504
00:23:05.519 --> 00:23:08.519
the relationship building. So working with our stakeholders ask them
505
00:23:08.599 --> 00:23:10.319
just you know, what's the priority is, what we should
506
00:23:10.319 --> 00:23:13.559
be working on, what maketures are important, what questions are
507
00:23:13.559 --> 00:23:15.920
they trying to answer, what decisions they're trying to make.
508
00:23:16.880 --> 00:23:18.440
And then based off that, then I think is when
509
00:23:18.440 --> 00:23:19.960
we can kind of start to build out and say
510
00:23:19.960 --> 00:23:22.519
what we have that we can build this out for you,
511
00:23:22.599 --> 00:23:23.759
and then we can give that to you or we
512
00:23:23.799 --> 00:23:25.319
can show you that, hey, this is how you would
513
00:23:25.359 --> 00:23:27.279
use that, or this is how you can leverage that.
514
00:23:28.799 --> 00:23:31.200
I think the tricky part that I've seen, and we're
515
00:23:31.240 --> 00:23:35.200
on a loan where you know, companies don't have large
516
00:23:35.319 --> 00:23:39.519
analyst teams like a couple, a couple functions may have
517
00:23:39.599 --> 00:23:42.319
like a data analyst or a business and that does
518
00:23:42.359 --> 00:23:45.240
some data work. So you know there's some data work
519
00:23:45.240 --> 00:23:47.039
that's done out in the business units, but a lot
520
00:23:47.039 --> 00:23:48.960
of that does fall onto the data team to kind
521
00:23:48.960 --> 00:23:50.960
of help fill in the gaps in terms of Okay,
522
00:23:51.039 --> 00:23:53.200
we've here's some data we can pull for you, or
523
00:23:53.319 --> 00:23:54.920
based off what you're saying, here's what we think you
524
00:23:54.920 --> 00:23:58.039
can use. So I think that's where I'm also kind
525
00:23:58.039 --> 00:24:00.839
of focused on too, is like how do you scale that?
526
00:24:01.119 --> 00:24:04.839
Just because every group doesn't have a dedicated analyst, so
527
00:24:04.880 --> 00:24:07.279
how do we automate, like either through AI or something
528
00:24:07.279 --> 00:24:09.480
like that, Like how do you how do you scale
529
00:24:09.680 --> 00:24:13.079
that analytical nature of like okay, the data change, what happened,
530
00:24:13.079 --> 00:24:14.880
why did it happen, What's going to happen next?
531
00:24:15.200 --> 00:24:17.079
So I think that's kind of the next frontier line.
532
00:24:17.119 --> 00:24:19.200
The data work is going past so you have bi
533
00:24:19.400 --> 00:24:22.039
of course, but it's also going past how to say, okay,
534
00:24:22.279 --> 00:24:25.079
BAEd off the metrics we capture, What does this mean?
535
00:24:25.240 --> 00:24:27.240
Why is it interesting? Like what is this going to
536
00:24:27.319 --> 00:24:30.359
tell the company? So I think that's where because we
537
00:24:30.359 --> 00:24:31.880
don't have enough people, we do not have enough bodies
538
00:24:31.880 --> 00:24:34.519
to do that, So that's goes to the efficiency and
539
00:24:34.559 --> 00:24:37.039
how do you use different methods to tell that story.
540
00:24:37.759 --> 00:24:40.519
It's an interesting problem but makes me think about just
541
00:24:40.799 --> 00:24:43.720
self service dashboards obviously. I mean a lot of teams
542
00:24:43.759 --> 00:24:46.079
are working to get more people in the company access
543
00:24:46.160 --> 00:24:48.839
to the right data, but then ensuring that they know
544
00:24:48.960 --> 00:24:51.200
like how to use it, how to filter it, and
545
00:24:51.279 --> 00:24:53.000
how to also make sense of what it is that
546
00:24:53.000 --> 00:24:55.839
they're saying so they don't make a decision based off
547
00:24:55.880 --> 00:24:59.240
of something that's like out of context. Aaron, I would
548
00:24:59.240 --> 00:25:01.599
love to talk with you a little bit about like
549
00:25:01.680 --> 00:25:05.680
your leadership, if that's okay. When you're leading these teams,
550
00:25:05.720 --> 00:25:08.359
you're working with people, what are the values that kind
551
00:25:08.400 --> 00:25:09.799
of drive the way that you lead.
552
00:25:09.920 --> 00:25:12.839
Yeah, I'm still learning, but I would say clarity. I mean,
553
00:25:13.480 --> 00:25:16.559
I'll say being in the weeds as much as you can.
554
00:25:16.680 --> 00:25:18.519
So I try to have one on ones with each
555
00:25:18.519 --> 00:25:21.200
of my direct reports every single week just to keep
556
00:25:21.240 --> 00:25:23.039
on track of like what's going on with the projects
557
00:25:23.039 --> 00:25:24.599
they're working on, just to make sure I have an
558
00:25:24.640 --> 00:25:25.759
idea of just what's going on.
559
00:25:26.240 --> 00:25:27.200
So I think that's that one.
560
00:25:28.079 --> 00:25:30.200
I'm clarity, Like I mentioned in the beginning of it,
561
00:25:30.240 --> 00:25:34.720
just being very clear about roles and responsibilities of like
562
00:25:34.839 --> 00:25:37.839
this happened? Is this team ever evolved? Like are you
563
00:25:37.880 --> 00:25:39.680
involved in this? Are you not involved in this? What's
564
00:25:39.720 --> 00:25:41.240
your role in this? What are you supposed to be doing?
565
00:25:41.279 --> 00:25:43.599
With expectations of you? I think a lot of people
566
00:25:43.799 --> 00:25:46.519
know this frustration that can happen because you think someone
567
00:25:46.519 --> 00:25:49.200
should be involved, but they never, like you never told
568
00:25:49.240 --> 00:25:50.880
them that they should be involved.
569
00:25:50.480 --> 00:25:52.440
And they never confirmed or deny it.
570
00:25:52.480 --> 00:25:55.759
So I think really being clear about expectations of this
571
00:25:55.799 --> 00:25:57.279
is where I need you this week. This is what
572
00:25:57.319 --> 00:26:02.559
I need from you. There's also vision which I'm working
573
00:26:02.599 --> 00:26:05.880
on too, like trying to share a vision of like
574
00:26:05.960 --> 00:26:07.720
this is where I think we need to be going,
575
00:26:07.759 --> 00:26:09.319
and that's why I think we need to be This
576
00:26:09.359 --> 00:26:11.960
is what I think we need to be doing. This
577
00:26:12.039 --> 00:26:13.960
is what I think the team should be aligned to.
578
00:26:14.240 --> 00:26:17.319
I think being repetitive around just like consistently saying the
579
00:26:17.319 --> 00:26:19.799
same things over and over again, just make sure that
580
00:26:19.799 --> 00:26:22.319
people get the message. So a lot of it is
581
00:26:22.359 --> 00:26:24.440
not even like the technical side. I think as you
582
00:26:24.440 --> 00:26:27.680
pull out into the leadership round, like the technical side
583
00:26:27.720 --> 00:26:32.519
isn't as strong, like it's more the change management, sharing strategy,
584
00:26:32.720 --> 00:26:36.599
executing a strategy. So I think that's the tricky part
585
00:26:36.599 --> 00:26:38.559
about a lot of the work that we do is
586
00:26:39.480 --> 00:26:41.240
you're not the reason that you might do like as
587
00:26:41.240 --> 00:26:43.200
you used to be, but you still have to have
588
00:26:43.319 --> 00:26:44.119
to lead the team.
589
00:26:43.960 --> 00:26:44.640
And lead the function.
590
00:26:45.200 --> 00:26:47.440
This is why I like having these kinds of conversations
591
00:26:47.519 --> 00:26:50.079
because you know, for me as a data analyst, I'm
592
00:26:50.079 --> 00:26:52.359
sure for other people who are analysts, it's like you
593
00:26:52.359 --> 00:26:55.519
don't always get the opportunity to speak with a manager
594
00:26:55.640 --> 00:26:58.359
or a director to find out what their perspective is, like,
595
00:26:58.440 --> 00:27:01.519
what they're looking for, what challenge is they experience. I
596
00:27:01.519 --> 00:27:05.440
feel like having that human awareness, you know, this is
597
00:27:05.440 --> 00:27:08.400
somebody on the other side who's got an entirely different
598
00:27:08.440 --> 00:27:11.200
world of their own that they're dealing with that as
599
00:27:11.200 --> 00:27:13.680
an analyst you just don't always get to peek into
600
00:27:13.880 --> 00:27:15.079
is very interesting to me.
601
00:27:16.359 --> 00:27:18.720
Yeah, I think you know, leaders are also figuring these
602
00:27:18.720 --> 00:27:21.079
things out. Like as a leader, when it comes to
603
00:27:21.200 --> 00:27:23.200
a question, we also like none of us know and
604
00:27:23.240 --> 00:27:25.000
we talk to our peers and they don't know either.
605
00:27:25.039 --> 00:27:27.079
So I think that's the that's the secret no one
606
00:27:27.119 --> 00:27:30.559
talks about is when it comes to AI strategy monetization,
607
00:27:30.759 --> 00:27:33.400
ROI like we're all trying to figure this out, like
608
00:27:33.440 --> 00:27:36.359
everyone's trying to We're trying things, we're testing things out.
609
00:27:36.960 --> 00:27:39.440
The question, just as leader, are you, are you showing
610
00:27:39.440 --> 00:27:41.079
your hands to your team and saying, hey, guys, like
611
00:27:41.079 --> 00:27:43.279
I need help with this, like I need input, I
612
00:27:43.279 --> 00:27:45.960
need feedback, I need to I need some responses. So
613
00:27:46.319 --> 00:27:49.359
I think there is some vulnerability too about being open
614
00:27:49.400 --> 00:27:52.480
and sharing you know, these things your team and say hey,
615
00:27:52.519 --> 00:27:55.319
I'm being pressed to figure these things out. I don't
616
00:27:55.359 --> 00:27:57.599
know what's going on. I need your help with this.
617
00:27:58.960 --> 00:28:01.680
But to your point, I mean, I think it's it's
618
00:28:01.799 --> 00:28:05.119
very tough to like we have one on ones, but
619
00:28:05.200 --> 00:28:07.480
it's you need like a separate one on just talking
620
00:28:07.519 --> 00:28:09.240
about these things separate because you want one You usually
621
00:28:09.279 --> 00:28:11.880
talking about like projects, you have half hour project updates,
622
00:28:12.119 --> 00:28:14.079
how's everything going, how's the family? But to your point
623
00:28:14.160 --> 00:28:16.720
is these are deeper discussions that you probably don't have
624
00:28:16.759 --> 00:28:18.920
time to talk with your leader about unless you sped
625
00:28:18.960 --> 00:28:21.200
the umber time and say like, can I just ask you,
626
00:28:21.279 --> 00:28:22.839
like how ask you about this?
627
00:28:23.079 --> 00:28:24.359
Ask you about this topic? So was it?
628
00:28:24.680 --> 00:28:27.920
Yes, it's definitely a different topic, which I think a
629
00:28:27.960 --> 00:28:30.559
lot of these podcasts are very very helpful, just talk
630
00:28:30.599 --> 00:28:33.599
to different leaders and executive leaders, to the c suite,
631
00:28:33.640 --> 00:28:37.200
senior leaders, you know, managers. I think that's why these
632
00:28:37.200 --> 00:28:39.440
are helpful, just to hear from the people in the weed,
633
00:28:39.519 --> 00:28:41.319
to hear from the little leaders about how they think.
634
00:28:41.160 --> 00:28:42.119
About these things.
635
00:28:42.759 --> 00:28:44.920
I think so too, because it helps build empathy.
636
00:28:44.960 --> 00:28:47.279
Because an analyst, when you're when you've got like this
637
00:28:47.359 --> 00:28:49.759
big black box, you just can't see what's happening on
638
00:28:49.759 --> 00:28:53.200
the other side, it's so easy to fill in those gaps.
639
00:28:52.880 --> 00:28:53.799
With your own narrative.
640
00:28:54.119 --> 00:28:56.359
Yeah, and it feels it feels so right, but it's
641
00:28:56.400 --> 00:28:59.240
not because you're just you're actually missing quite a bit
642
00:28:59.319 --> 00:29:01.920
that's happening. And even if you know, let's say you
643
00:29:01.960 --> 00:29:04.119
have an idea and you present it to your manager
644
00:29:04.240 --> 00:29:06.599
or with the director, and you know they're saying, this
645
00:29:06.640 --> 00:29:08.720
is a good idea, but not right now. You could
646
00:29:08.759 --> 00:29:11.079
fill that in with your own story or they may
647
00:29:11.160 --> 00:29:14.720
genuinely like it. There's just not enough resources, the timing's
648
00:29:14.799 --> 00:29:17.119
not right, it doesn't align with the goals, whatever that
649
00:29:17.200 --> 00:29:17.480
may be.
650
00:29:18.680 --> 00:29:23.480
Yeah, and I think that's the clarity question of like
651
00:29:23.559 --> 00:29:25.839
just confirm it, because I think to your point, in
652
00:29:25.920 --> 00:29:28.000
the void, we make up around narratives, around what we
653
00:29:28.039 --> 00:29:30.599
think happened and why it happened. But I think that's
654
00:29:30.599 --> 00:29:31.839
where you have to ask the question. And I think
655
00:29:31.839 --> 00:29:33.880
those are those hard discussions, but I think they're helpful
656
00:29:33.920 --> 00:29:36.079
just to kind of clear it up the narrative because
657
00:29:36.079 --> 00:29:37.759
someone say, hey, I was having a bad day or
658
00:29:38.119 --> 00:29:40.119
I thought we were going this way, they completely changed
659
00:29:40.119 --> 00:29:42.759
the story right before the meetings. I think getting things
660
00:29:42.799 --> 00:29:45.319
documented because the problem I have is sometimes people say, well,
661
00:29:45.359 --> 00:29:47.880
they said this and they said that, and I always say.
662
00:29:47.359 --> 00:29:48.759
Is this documented? Is there an email?
663
00:29:48.839 --> 00:29:50.559
But they're like no, Well, first of all, let's get
664
00:29:50.559 --> 00:29:53.400
this on paper or digital paper, like an email something,
665
00:29:53.759 --> 00:29:55.119
just the way we can share and say I have
666
00:29:55.200 --> 00:29:57.000
it here where you said this, or this happen, or
667
00:29:57.000 --> 00:29:58.079
this project thing you happen.
668
00:29:58.440 --> 00:30:00.519
Let's talk through that. Yeah.
669
00:30:00.519 --> 00:30:03.039
But I think it's just clarity and having just a
670
00:30:03.039 --> 00:30:07.240
lot of discussions. And that's just as much as the
671
00:30:07.279 --> 00:30:10.160
technical work like the coding and building the things are helpful,
672
00:30:10.599 --> 00:30:12.240
you still have to deal with the people themselves to
673
00:30:12.279 --> 00:30:13.799
make sure that you're going on the right path.
674
00:30:14.200 --> 00:30:14.400
Right.
675
00:30:14.559 --> 00:30:17.839
There was another podcast that you had spoken on and
676
00:30:17.880 --> 00:30:20.759
you mentioned the player coach model. Would you mind sharing
677
00:30:20.759 --> 00:30:23.119
a little bit more about what that What that means.
678
00:30:23.480 --> 00:30:25.440
I've seen that a lot where you have people that
679
00:30:25.480 --> 00:30:28.200
were promoted to like a manager position, but when they
680
00:30:28.240 --> 00:30:31.839
were promoted, they didn't they didn't give their work to
681
00:30:31.839 --> 00:30:34.000
anyone else. They're still doing the work they did before,
682
00:30:34.000 --> 00:30:37.000
but now they're a manager. But that's very difficult because
683
00:30:37.160 --> 00:30:39.039
I normally have to be in the ways doing this stuff.
684
00:30:39.079 --> 00:30:41.440
I have to also lead the team, but it's very
685
00:30:41.440 --> 00:30:45.319
difficult to like lead the team. You don't really have
686
00:30:45.400 --> 00:30:48.079
much time to think about strategy or resourcing because you're
687
00:30:48.119 --> 00:30:50.400
so busy. So I know a lot of people do
688
00:30:50.480 --> 00:30:52.599
that because it seems like a cheaper out just because
689
00:30:52.599 --> 00:30:53.960
oh I can, like I can pay them to be
690
00:30:54.000 --> 00:30:55.839
a manager, but I can also do that stuff too.
691
00:30:55.920 --> 00:30:58.960
But it's very difficult to kind of do both very
692
00:30:59.000 --> 00:31:03.079
well because then you're your haphazard coder or haphazard analytic,
693
00:31:03.079 --> 00:31:04.960
but you're also a haphazard manager. So you're kind of
694
00:31:05.000 --> 00:31:07.359
like part time, Like you're doing like part time with
695
00:31:07.440 --> 00:31:10.200
each of them. But then it feels like if you
696
00:31:10.200 --> 00:31:11.799
pay people, if you do things part time, you get
697
00:31:11.799 --> 00:31:15.839
part time results. So it's a difficult model to be
698
00:31:15.960 --> 00:31:16.920
very successful at.
699
00:31:17.720 --> 00:31:19.519
It sounds kind of like You've got one foot in,
700
00:31:19.640 --> 00:31:22.480
one foot out, Aaron. You've shared so much about like
701
00:31:22.519 --> 00:31:25.680
your work experience. Before we wrap up this conversation, I
702
00:31:25.720 --> 00:31:27.799
was hoping to learn a little bit more about the
703
00:31:27.920 --> 00:31:29.759
data and the d community that you created.
704
00:31:30.119 --> 00:31:32.039
Every single month, we kind of have these happy hour
705
00:31:32.079 --> 00:31:34.519
and we just have one last night, which is why
706
00:31:34.559 --> 00:31:36.920
I came home late. My daughter drew a picture. So
707
00:31:37.079 --> 00:31:39.039
every single month we go to a different bar and
708
00:31:39.079 --> 00:31:41.240
restaurant in the area. So very simple. So we don't
709
00:31:41.279 --> 00:31:43.359
charge anything, so it was a free event. We don't
710
00:31:43.400 --> 00:31:46.640
have any speakers, no sponsors, and no sales, so you
711
00:31:46.720 --> 00:31:49.240
just show up, you talk shop with some people that
712
00:31:49.319 --> 00:31:52.920
they're in the same industry, then you go home. So
713
00:31:52.920 --> 00:31:54.720
you do them every single month. We started this in
714
00:31:54.799 --> 00:31:57.039
June twenty twenty four. We've been doing it for the
715
00:31:57.079 --> 00:32:00.440
past year and a half. Been very successful. We realize
716
00:32:00.480 --> 00:32:03.039
a lot of our people, of our community members wanted more,
717
00:32:03.119 --> 00:32:06.480
so we did a conference. We actually ended up selling out.
718
00:32:06.559 --> 00:32:08.599
So it's one of the things where we're like, we're
719
00:32:08.599 --> 00:32:10.799
all volunteers. We don't do it full time. It's a
720
00:32:10.799 --> 00:32:13.519
part time gig. After work. I talked with my peers
721
00:32:13.559 --> 00:32:15.519
to figure out what they're working on. So it's been
722
00:32:16.000 --> 00:32:18.200
growing very organic that like people tell each other about
723
00:32:18.200 --> 00:32:20.400
it to hear about it. So it's just been a
724
00:32:20.400 --> 00:32:23.799
great experience, just because Detroit has a very vast and
725
00:32:23.920 --> 00:32:28.240
diverse businesses, so it's good for people with like people
726
00:32:28.240 --> 00:32:30.039
in the food inutry. You can talk to automotive, they
727
00:32:30.079 --> 00:32:32.279
can talk to healthcare, they can talk to financial services.
728
00:32:32.319 --> 00:32:34.480
So it's just been a great way for the local
729
00:32:34.559 --> 00:32:38.200
data community to get together and just have good discussions,
730
00:32:38.240 --> 00:32:42.319
meet people connect because I think after COVID, everyone's working
731
00:32:42.359 --> 00:32:43.960
remote now, so people want to meet people in the
732
00:32:44.000 --> 00:32:44.440
real world.
733
00:32:44.559 --> 00:32:47.559
Well, I'm sure it's incredibly valuable for the community, so
734
00:32:47.839 --> 00:32:50.559
I'm really thrilled that it exists out in the world
735
00:32:50.559 --> 00:32:53.559
and that people are attending. Erin, thank you again so
736
00:32:53.680 --> 00:32:56.319
much for joining this podcast. It really was a pleasure
737
00:32:56.759 --> 00:32:59.559
getting to know you and your leadership and your story.
738
00:33:00.200 --> 00:33:03.720
For anyone who's listening, I will also be posting Aaron's
739
00:33:03.759 --> 00:33:06.359
link to his LinkedIn in the description so that you
740
00:33:06.400 --> 00:33:10.079
can follow him and learn more about what he's up to.
741
00:33:10.400 --> 00:33:12.640
So thank you again, Erin. It really was such a
742
00:33:12.640 --> 00:33:13.799
pleasure having you on the show.
743
00:33:14.200 --> 00:33:16.519
Yes, thanks for having me time flew by quickly, so
744
00:33:16.519 --> 00:33:18.640
these are all fun discussion. Like you mentioned, get I
745
00:33:18.680 --> 00:33:20.680
don't get to talk about a lot of these things
746
00:33:20.720 --> 00:33:22.279
in just the day to day because you so focus
747
00:33:22.440 --> 00:33:26.400
on like the projects and the company. So these are good, fun,
748
00:33:26.680 --> 00:33:29.359
free willing kind of discussions to have. It is how
749
00:33:29.400 --> 00:33:31.039
you learn, is how you continue to grow as having
750
00:33:31.119 --> 00:33:31.839
dialog like this.
751
00:33:32.200 --> 00:33:35.960
So thank you, Thank you for listening to the quietly
752
00:33:36.039 --> 00:33:40.160
ambitious Analyst. If today's episode helped you see data in
753
00:33:40.200 --> 00:33:43.319
a new way, share it with someone who'd appreciate it too,
754
00:33:43.799 --> 00:33:47.279
and follow the show for more lessons on business communication
755
00:33:47.599 --> 00:33:51.119
and driving impact with data. And if you found it helpful,
756
00:33:51.319 --> 00:33:54.599
leaving a quick review really helps this podcast reach more
757
00:33:54.680 --> 00:33:57.079
people who want to grow in the same way. Until
758
00:33:57.160 --> 00:33:59.759
next time, focus only on what you can control and
759
00:33:59.759 --> 00:34:01.920
star drive to be one percent better each day.