درباره این اپیزود
In this conversation, Jason Gorman and Adarsh Lathika explore what happens to human capability when AI starts doing more of the thinking. Adarsh, a strategy and learning systems practitioner, introduces concepts like the shadow curriculum, cognitive debt, and the Anatomy of Work framework to explain how learners and employees are increasingly bypassing formal learning systems and building their own AI-powered solutions. They discuss why institutions and employers are losing relevance as learning providers, how prioritizing speed and output over depth is eroding foundational skills, and why human biology, judgment, and context are becoming the true competitive advantages in an AI-first world. Adarsh also unpacks three major shifts reshaping the field: from institutions to individuals, from courses to systems, and from knowledge to judgment.
Takeaways- Learners are building their own AI-powered learning tools outside formal systems.
- Knowledge is now abundant and instant; judgment is the real differentiator.
- AI is shortcutting the repetitive work that historically built domain expertise.
- Junior professionals are losing the chance to develop intuition through experience.
- Prioritizing speed and output creates only superficial skill development.
- Employees no longer trust that organizations are invested in their growth.
- L&D must shift from curating courses to building self-sustaining learning systems.
- Human biology, discipline, and habits outside work directly affect workplace performance.
- Transparency between employers and employees is essential to navigating this transition.
- Institutions must become places where cognitive and behavioral skills are built, not just credentials earned.
یادداشت ها را نشان دهید 🔗
رونوشت 🔗
00:00:05,000 --> 00:00:10,574
Welcome to the Learning Experience Ops Show, where we talk about making learning better
that's future ready.
2
00:00:10,575 --> 00:00:11,446
I'm Jason Gorman.
3
00:00:11,446 --> 00:00:14,518
I'm the founder and CEO of Jackrabbit Learning Experience.
4
00:00:15,499 --> 00:00:23,325
We spend a lot of time as learning professionals designing courses, building programs, and
refining content, which we should.
5
00:00:23,386 --> 00:00:24,707
That's the work.
6
00:00:25,028 --> 00:00:32,854
But I keep running into a question out in the world and in my own head that I can't quite
shake, which is,
7
00:00:33,462 --> 00:00:39,505
As we are doing the work of building courses, are people waiting for us to actually finish
the work that we're doing?
8
00:00:39,505 --> 00:00:42,922
Because I think increasingly they may not be.
9
00:00:42,922 --> 00:00:53,032
I think learners, employees, and students are more and more going out and just grabbing AI
tools that they need and building their own solutions to help them learn.
10
00:00:53,173 --> 00:00:59,797
They are figuring out how to learn what they need when they need it, maybe without us more
increasingly.
11
00:00:59,797 --> 00:01:02,210
And I don't know that we have
12
00:01:02,210 --> 00:01:11,716
fully reckoned with what that means for the systems we build and the roles that we have
played as learning professionals and will play into the future.
13
00:01:11,716 --> 00:01:15,298
And my guest today has been studying exactly this.
14
00:01:15,298 --> 00:01:24,323
He calls it the shadow curriculum, and his research is surfacing patterns that I think all
of us, every learning professional needs to understand.
15
00:01:25,124 --> 00:01:29,606
He's asking about what happens to human cognition when AI
16
00:01:29,774 --> 00:01:36,351
there's more of the thinking for us and what institutions need to become if they want to
stay relevant.
17
00:01:36,351 --> 00:01:44,207
Adarsh Lathika is a strategy and learning systems practitioner working at the intersection
of AI human behavior and the future of work.
18
00:01:44,268 --> 00:01:55,837
He has spent over 15 years across higher education, executive learning and consulting, and
is currently building frameworks like Anatomy of Work to understand how learning work and
19
00:01:55,837 --> 00:02:01,161
performance are being reshaped in an AI first world.
20
00:02:01,302 --> 00:02:06,005
His work focuses on helping institutions and organizations rethink
21
00:02:06,123 --> 00:02:14,586
not just what people learn, but how, why, and whether learning translates into real-world
capability.
22
00:02:14,586 --> 00:02:17,279
Welcome so much to the show, Adarsh.
23
00:02:17,899 --> 00:02:18,864
Thank so much, Jason.
24
00:02:18,864 --> 00:02:21,304
Quite excited to be part of this podcast.
25
00:02:21,427 --> 00:02:23,111
Awesome, so glad to have you here.
26
00:02:23,111 --> 00:02:25,287
All right, let's jump in with some lightning round questions.
27
00:02:25,287 --> 00:02:29,556
What is just a 30 second elevator pitch about what you do in your
28
00:02:30,378 --> 00:02:36,354
So I try to study the misalignment or the growing misalignment between work and human
cognition.
29
00:02:36,354 --> 00:02:38,036
That's what my focus is.
30
00:02:38,036 --> 00:02:42,111
So the eventual objective is how do you drive performance and productivity.
31
00:02:42,111 --> 00:02:43,834
What do love the most about your work?
32
00:02:43,834 --> 00:02:49,419
think the more I delve deep into it, the more I realize that I don't know much.
33
00:02:49,419 --> 00:02:50,800
It's a very open canvas.
34
00:02:50,800 --> 00:03:01,426
In fact, when I started on this journey, I went back to my 10th standard biology text to
understand brain and really go back to the basic concepts to get a sense of what the
35
00:03:01,426 --> 00:03:08,040
neurotransmitters does, what each part of segments of brain does to human behavior and how
they are related.
36
00:03:08,099 --> 00:03:22,859
So it's been therefore an exciting part to really relearn a lot of things that I left
behind some 20 years ago and then repurpose to what we are experiencing today so that we
37
00:03:22,859 --> 00:03:27,010
are a bit more doing better for ourselves in coming future.
38
00:03:27,010 --> 00:03:36,416
And just to get you know a little bit better just in your day-to-day work, if you are
really in the flow state and you're just kind of time is passing quickly and you're
39
00:03:36,416 --> 00:03:38,840
totally immersed, what are you most likely to be doing?
40
00:03:38,840 --> 00:03:39,981
building something.
41
00:03:39,981 --> 00:03:45,102
So I do have some background of uh programming.
42
00:03:45,102 --> 00:03:49,283
So I leverage my coding a bit to build.
43
00:03:49,283 --> 00:03:55,695
So I started building productivity tools for myself so that I can do things oh much
faster.
44
00:03:55,695 --> 00:03:57,767
I don't really need a team to do it for me.
45
00:03:57,767 --> 00:04:04,819
From that I started then once I started getting hang of that I started building slightly
more complicated tools as well.
46
00:04:05,298 --> 00:04:07,956
something that helps me both personally and professionally.
47
00:04:07,956 --> 00:04:09,491
So that's what I do most.
48
00:04:09,491 --> 00:04:11,947
That what I do enjoy doing most.
49
00:04:12,789 --> 00:04:13,791
That's wonderful.
50
00:04:13,791 --> 00:04:17,757
And I just described a little bit about what you do.
51
00:04:17,757 --> 00:04:19,941
You just gave your 30 second elevator pitch.
52
00:04:19,941 --> 00:04:24,038
I'm curious, what was it that inspired you to do what you do?
53
00:04:24,038 --> 00:04:33,698
So, I mean, a few things that are elicited over a period of time is that, one, humans are
important.
54
00:04:34,138 --> 00:04:44,669
I think as a species in this planet, we have lot of responsibility to what we do, why we
do, and equally important why we don't do something.
55
00:04:44,669 --> 00:04:48,714
So a couple of years ago, I decided to take a career break and
56
00:04:48,714 --> 00:04:53,615
That was the time where AI was coming, this whole charge GPT moment happened.
57
00:04:53,795 --> 00:04:59,677
And the first thing that came to my mind was the 1984 from George Orwell.
58
00:04:59,677 --> 00:05:10,443
And the more I was understanding what charge GPT was promising, more I was fearing maybe
to some extent that that obedient world may happen in my lifetime.
59
00:05:10,443 --> 00:05:12,675
And I was not very happy about it.
60
00:05:12,675 --> 00:05:17,558
So question was that, how do you then give the power back to the humans?
61
00:05:17,558 --> 00:05:18,986
So I started thinking about it.
62
00:05:18,986 --> 00:05:20,349
I had the time to do it.
63
00:05:20,349 --> 00:05:23,061
I started listening to lot of podcasts around the world.
64
00:05:23,061 --> 00:05:26,742
I think that's something that internet just allows you to do.
65
00:05:26,742 --> 00:05:28,613
So I started reading a lot as well.
66
00:05:28,613 --> 00:05:37,267
And then once I started reflecting back on that or injecting that on top of my
professional experience,
67
00:05:37,479 --> 00:05:40,171
I felt that maybe oh we need to go back.
68
00:05:40,171 --> 00:05:44,726
So what could be the gaps that can develop over the next three, four years?
69
00:05:44,726 --> 00:05:49,051
So my understanding was that knowledge is becoming abundant and instantaneous.
70
00:05:49,051 --> 00:05:55,556
So when that is happening, what is the role that as a human we will play at workplace?
71
00:05:55,556 --> 00:06:00,603
So then that's when the whole idea about judgment and context came to my mind.
72
00:06:00,603 --> 00:06:01,915
since then, I've been focusing on
73
00:06:01,915 --> 00:06:07,366
You kind of touched on this a little bit already, but what are you the most anxious about
for the future?
74
00:06:07,366 --> 00:06:10,846
Personally, I don't like somebody else taking decisions for me.
75
00:06:10,846 --> 00:06:12,767
I'm not a big fan of that.
76
00:06:12,827 --> 00:06:27,267
So, and I think when it is AI to make that happen at a large population scale, then I
think we, especially as a, at the context of India, we take a lot of pride of being the
77
00:06:27,267 --> 00:06:31,007
youngest nation or youngest nation for the next say 20 years.
78
00:06:31,032 --> 00:06:39,497
But imagine a case where in which we have a huge population of youthful, high energetic
population, but nothing to do.
79
00:06:39,658 --> 00:06:44,663
And I think that can become very negative, very fast that we can't really control.
80
00:06:44,663 --> 00:06:54,363
So that is what I'm a bit worried about because there's a journey that as a country we are
going through since independence and we had the time.
81
00:06:54,561 --> 00:06:58,502
to course correct because time allowed us to do it.
82
00:06:58,502 --> 00:07:01,224
But now AI is making everything redundant.
83
00:07:01,224 --> 00:07:10,587
I'm not so sure whether we are responding correctly to what AI is today and what AI
promises to be tomorrow.
84
00:07:10,587 --> 00:07:13,208
So that is something that makes me anxious.
85
00:07:13,208 --> 00:07:19,212
But at the same time, it also is a great opportunity that can unlock if you're using it
the
86
00:07:19,212 --> 00:07:20,047
right way.
87
00:07:20,047 --> 00:07:23,432
So I am trying to focus more on the latter.
88
00:07:23,796 --> 00:07:24,108
Good.
89
00:07:24,108 --> 00:07:26,284
And last lightning round question.
90
00:07:26,284 --> 00:07:27,816
What is a skill?
91
00:07:28,239 --> 00:07:32,440
Can be related to your work, not related to your work, but what's a skill you're trying to
learn right now?
92
00:07:32,440 --> 00:07:39,808
So, one thing which I am trying to learn is how do I sell better because I am a
solopreneur.
93
00:07:39,808 --> 00:07:46,353
So, I love building and I could afford to be a builder maybe 10-15 years ago.
94
00:07:46,353 --> 00:07:47,914
Not so much in AI first world.
95
00:07:47,914 --> 00:07:49,685
I can't afford to do it.
96
00:07:49,685 --> 00:07:57,922
So, I believe that everything and anything related to selling as a skill, right from
public speaking to story, narrating a story.
97
00:07:57,922 --> 00:08:05,003
to being in front of a crowd and speaking those, these are the skills that I'm working on
and I use AI for that as well.
98
00:08:05,455 --> 00:08:10,095
Good, yeah, wherever we can get that advantage, let's get that advantage.
99
00:08:11,595 --> 00:08:14,895
All right, well, we'll move to the kind of longer form questions here.
100
00:08:14,895 --> 00:08:26,475
I mentioned that you came into this field of learning through operations, things like
building and scaling systems across university campuses, online initiative, executive
101
00:08:26,475 --> 00:08:28,835
education, corporate settings.
102
00:08:29,655 --> 00:08:34,335
And you have said elsewhere that the pattern you have seen
103
00:08:34,434 --> 00:08:43,114
is that we typically optimize for delivering learning, but not translating it into human
capability.
104
00:08:43,456 --> 00:08:52,718
And so I'm curious if you can give me just a specific moment or project that you were on
where you really saw that gap clearly, just to illustrate.
105
00:08:52,718 --> 00:09:01,638
So the background to that is that I have a habit of going through P &S.
106
00:09:02,218 --> 00:09:15,798
And something that was very stark and became very strongly apparent to me was that human
resources are always on the expense side of the balance sheet.
107
00:09:16,518 --> 00:09:18,698
And it's just OK.
108
00:09:18,718 --> 00:09:19,938
Maybe in early.
109
00:09:20,310 --> 00:09:34,336
2010s it was okay, but with automation data science now AI coming to picture I think We
need to start valuing human for the Contextual understanding Yoshi has and that is with
110
00:09:34,336 --> 00:09:40,273
the current gap that AI has because Like if you had to come compare US and India and I
want to start
111
00:09:40,273 --> 00:09:46,133
I want to open a restaurant say in San Francisco and I want to start a restaurant in
Bangalore.
112
00:09:46,133 --> 00:09:50,993
Now I will give the same prompt for both cases.
113
00:09:50,993 --> 00:10:03,733
I am more likely to rely on the response that AI gives me for opening a restaurant in San
Francisco because India as a country we contribute to less than 5 % of internet data.
114
00:10:03,733 --> 00:10:10,093
So that means AI doesn't have the context in which a city like Bangalore operates.
115
00:10:10,291 --> 00:10:20,727
Of course, there might be some aspects that we can definitely apply, but the finer things
will still be amiss.
116
00:10:20,727 --> 00:10:23,612
So that can only be brought in by a human.
117
00:10:23,612 --> 00:10:25,476
So therefore, human is valuable.
118
00:10:25,476 --> 00:10:29,761
So where I realized this was when data science started becoming very popular.
119
00:10:29,761 --> 00:10:34,147
We started a data science school way back in 2014-15.
120
00:10:34,147 --> 00:10:43,196
Now, so I think at that time, we were probably the second most prominent education
provider in the country to launch a data science course.
121
00:10:43,334 --> 00:10:54,739
And what I felt was that I asked the best question, why is a learner who's done a bachelor
or a master's going to again come to my campus to sit through a 9 month course, a diploma
122
00:10:54,739 --> 00:11:00,171
course, what is that he or she is going to achieve or what is the aspiring to achieve?
123
00:11:00,171 --> 00:11:06,874
We might think that it is the skill of neuroscience, but the fact is that he or she wants
a job.
124
00:11:06,874 --> 00:11:10,868
So what I did at that point of time is that even when we had
125
00:11:10,868 --> 00:11:14,168
Launching the pilot batch I created a system.
126
00:11:14,288 --> 00:11:23,668
So we partnered with IBM big data at that point of time We partnered with a couple of
there is this company so that they can not only bring in their own faculty for doing guest
127
00:11:23,668 --> 00:11:30,648
lectures, but also Give them internship and then final placement jobs as well.
128
00:11:30,648 --> 00:11:35,346
So because I was able to create the ecosystem that program
129
00:11:35,346 --> 00:11:42,161
became successful and this is time when I was monitoring it, it was one of the largest, oh
most successful program within the company.
130
00:11:42,161 --> 00:11:46,385
I think in a three year period, it graduated close to 670 people.
131
00:11:46,385 --> 00:11:49,427
So it was, so that really worked for me.
132
00:11:49,427 --> 00:11:58,673
So what I'm trying to say is that I put the learner as the focus and I put all the
business metrics around it.
133
00:11:58,714 --> 00:12:00,762
Because I was able to do that,
134
00:12:00,762 --> 00:12:03,754
we were able to create a business which was sustainable.
135
00:12:03,814 --> 00:12:05,535
Sustainable because learners wanted it.
136
00:12:05,535 --> 00:12:08,237
We were not trying to push a product.
137
00:12:08,237 --> 00:12:11,159
It was actually pulling learners to our product.
138
00:12:11,159 --> 00:12:15,183
So if you have to now put in the context of what AI is doing.
139
00:12:15,183 --> 00:12:19,806
As I said earlier, I'm trying to learn public speaking, improve my public speaking skills.
140
00:12:19,806 --> 00:12:20,827
How am I doing it?
141
00:12:20,827 --> 00:12:22,288
I record one.
142
00:12:22,288 --> 00:12:26,340
I raise my hand for every opportunity that I can get.
143
00:12:26,438 --> 00:12:29,958
Second, when I do land up that opportunity, I record the conversation.
144
00:12:29,958 --> 00:12:32,138
Then I have a custom GPT created.
145
00:12:32,138 --> 00:12:34,878
I feed that according to the custom GPT.
146
00:12:34,878 --> 00:12:44,358
Then there is a rubric that I created based on my secondary research that I've done on how
a public speaking should be done.
147
00:12:44,498 --> 00:12:48,558
The intonation, the vocabulary, the fillers that you use.
148
00:12:48,558 --> 00:12:50,038
There are eight, nine parameters that are there.
149
00:12:50,038 --> 00:12:56,538
So I keep, I have created a feedback structure wherein I get a report saying, you are
done.
150
00:12:56,615 --> 00:13:04,300
good in these five things, you are okay in other two things and these are definitely two
things that you need to improve upon.
151
00:13:04,900 --> 00:13:14,008
that becomes very important because as I said earlier, the employees are learning and
everything is still an expensive item for an organization.
152
00:13:14,349 --> 00:13:18,032
They are seeing a world where in which more and more people are getting laid off.
153
00:13:18,032 --> 00:13:23,555
So employees today are not seeing that commitment from the organization for their career
path.
154
00:13:23,797 --> 00:13:34,083
So the question comes back from an employee perspective is that if the employer is not
promising me a five years or 10 years with them, why should I then commit another five
155
00:13:34,083 --> 00:13:34,383
years?
156
00:13:34,383 --> 00:13:39,035
So my company may want to learn, say for example, Python.
157
00:13:39,035 --> 00:13:48,420
But I as an individual may feel, okay, I don't want to learn Python because now coding is
as easy as just picking two system and generating code.
158
00:13:48,420 --> 00:13:49,731
Then why should I bother about it?
159
00:13:49,731 --> 00:13:51,402
Let me learn storytelling.
160
00:13:51,402 --> 00:13:53,792
So the company may be investing a lot on
161
00:13:53,792 --> 00:13:55,413
getting the person to learn coding.
162
00:13:55,413 --> 00:14:02,319
But I may use in ChatGP to your Gemini or some other coding instance to improve my public
skills or storyboarding skills.
163
00:14:02,499 --> 00:14:08,474
So that is going to be dichotomy, which will the gap is going to continue to widen, widen
and widen.
164
00:14:08,802 --> 00:14:09,912
Mm-hmm.
165
00:14:10,753 --> 00:14:14,234
You have described what you call a shadow learning system.
166
00:14:14,334 --> 00:14:17,935
And you've kind of just went into that a little bit just now.
167
00:14:18,232 --> 00:14:29,000
But the idea, basically, as I understand it, is that learners are using AI to build their
own tools in parallel to any kind of formal education that they're getting.
168
00:14:29,231 --> 00:14:38,129
And they're doing this in part because institutions, employers or universities aren't
actually keeping up with what's possible.
169
00:14:38,270 --> 00:14:47,338
And so I'm curious, can you walk me through how you think this is happening now, how this
shadow learning is happening?
170
00:14:47,338 --> 00:14:50,891
Just what does that look like for a student or an employee?
171
00:14:51,221 --> 00:14:54,921
So the scenarios are different for both parties.
172
00:14:54,921 --> 00:15:01,901
For the student, institution is still important because you still need a degree to get a
job.
173
00:15:01,901 --> 00:15:11,461
At least from where I come from, that's a basic qualification that it does not matter what
degree it is, but you need to have a graduate degree to get your first job.
174
00:15:11,461 --> 00:15:13,292
Therefore, institution is still important.
175
00:15:13,292 --> 00:15:18,972
That scenario is slightly different for somebody who is a working professional.
176
00:15:19,276 --> 00:15:30,718
largely because one, you keep hearing this news about people getting laid off almost on a
every third day you get a news assembly or there's a mass layoff happening in a globally
177
00:15:30,718 --> 00:15:41,769
repeated company and you don't know whether it's going to be you next or when is your turn
and historically what I experienced is that the while we talk about it in the vision
178
00:15:41,769 --> 00:15:42,861
mission or the
179
00:15:42,861 --> 00:15:48,001
company statements, we are not really very transparent when it comes to employee
communication.
180
00:15:48,161 --> 00:15:54,601
So that gap also adds to this anxiety that the employees can have.
181
00:15:55,241 --> 00:15:58,912
So that means it's a dogged out world.
182
00:15:58,912 --> 00:16:03,132
I feel that the employer is not committed to my career growth, my professional growth.
183
00:16:03,132 --> 00:16:05,112
Therefore, I do what I believe is the right thing.
184
00:16:05,112 --> 00:16:08,371
So if somebody comes to you today and tell me you learn
185
00:16:08,371 --> 00:16:13,994
Google AI Studio because that is the most important tool today, I go and learn that.
186
00:16:14,134 --> 00:16:18,147
Tomorrow, Anthropic might launch a better coding agent than that.
187
00:16:18,147 --> 00:16:19,958
So I learned that tomorrow.
188
00:16:19,958 --> 00:16:30,583
what internally it indirectly does is that it just, gives me as an employee, it gives me a
sense that I'm actually learning and doing the right thing.
189
00:16:30,583 --> 00:16:37,655
But what it internally does is it's creating a lot of anxiety inside my subconscious mind.
190
00:16:37,655 --> 00:16:48,121
that I am always hyper which means that I not focused at work I am not giving 100 % at
work so the company starts suffering and over a period of time I also start suffering so
191
00:16:48,121 --> 00:17:00,071
it's a loss loss game that both of us are playing so in that way what I feel is that even
if it hurts be transparent with the employees say be very clear that these are the five
192
00:17:00,071 --> 00:17:02,208
things which is going to happen in the next one month
193
00:17:02,208 --> 00:17:04,431
because it's difficult to predict what's going to happen after that.
194
00:17:04,431 --> 00:17:08,509
therefore, explain your decision very detailed to the employees.
195
00:17:08,509 --> 00:17:14,699
I think employees today are very smart to understand when somebody's been genuine and
being honest in their communication.
196
00:17:14,699 --> 00:17:17,461
And I'm sure that people will rally behind that.
197
00:17:17,461 --> 00:17:23,927
And even if they end up being laid off, they have a very better understanding of why that
happened and why they don't really fit into that plan.
198
00:17:23,927 --> 00:17:26,980
I think that becomes very important.
199
00:17:26,980 --> 00:17:33,369
It seems like there's this kind of necessary degree of trust here between the employee and
the institution.
200
00:17:33,369 --> 00:17:41,823
And it seems like with this shadow learning system, if an employee or a student is using
tools to...
201
00:17:41,823 --> 00:17:46,003
to do their own learning, why do they need the institution for that?
202
00:17:46,003 --> 00:17:50,034
Yeah, why would they depend on the institution at all?
203
00:17:50,586 --> 00:17:57,463
So if you look at student as a cert, you still need a degree, therefore institution
becomes important.
204
00:17:57,463 --> 00:18:07,554
looking ahead, I think institution can actually transform into a place where students
build their cognitive and behavioral skills, which I believe are two important segments of
205
00:18:07,554 --> 00:18:12,040
skills which are going to keep them employable in the next 5, 10, 15 years.
206
00:18:12,040 --> 00:18:14,301
So that transition needs to happen.
207
00:18:14,305 --> 00:18:19,566
But from an employee perspective, that's a very pertinent question and it's not very easy
one to answer.
208
00:18:19,566 --> 00:18:29,981
Largely because I'll again go back to the fact that uh all the employees and employer
related investments are still expense in the balance sheet and not really a detailed
209
00:18:29,981 --> 00:18:31,011
investment.
210
00:18:31,011 --> 00:18:38,174
So historically, what has happened is learning and development teams tried to optimize the
training intervention.
211
00:18:38,174 --> 00:18:40,445
So as long as you are the
212
00:18:41,105 --> 00:18:51,402
either the in-house team or the external vendors are able to meet a minimum level of
quality they always go for the cheaper option because at some point of time the EBITDA or
213
00:18:51,402 --> 00:19:03,103
the PAT is going to come into picture and they try to always protect that so when you
start doing it, it becomes very difficult to make the transition to something because you
214
00:19:03,103 --> 00:19:08,596
are trying to meet a short-term objective but not really building a company for
215
00:19:08,631 --> 00:19:10,511
next 5-10 years.
216
00:19:10,711 --> 00:19:14,511
So that becomes very challenging for the L &D team.
217
00:19:14,791 --> 00:19:25,211
And that means that they need to work very closely with finance and the purchase for most
part to ensure that to convince them that why this investment at this rate is important.
218
00:19:25,211 --> 00:19:32,951
Because even when for example, I have seen cases where in which you are trying to deliver
an AI training to a set of people.
219
00:19:33,011 --> 00:19:36,118
So the CHRO may approve it, the L &D head may approve it.
220
00:19:36,118 --> 00:19:45,178
but then again it goes to the purchase and the finance what they do is that they just look
at the proposal as excel items they just do a comparison with what is available in the
221
00:19:45,178 --> 00:19:57,298
market and they look at high level keywords say you know I can get you 10 % cheaper, 20 %
cheaper and then the question becomes what is cheaper to be delivered and I don't think HR
222
00:19:57,298 --> 00:20:05,514
or L &D fights beyond a point and then you always end up extending or giving a substandard
training program to the employees
223
00:20:05,514 --> 00:20:07,257
which means that employees are not happy.
224
00:20:07,257 --> 00:20:08,821
Again, the loop just continues.
225
00:20:08,821 --> 00:20:13,681
So we need a very confident and assertive NND team to actually make this work.
226
00:20:13,681 --> 00:20:26,521
You've also written about this notion of cognitive debt, which is that AI is reducing
engagement and pushing people away from thinking and more towards just verifying the
227
00:20:26,521 --> 00:20:29,832
output that the AI produces.
228
00:20:30,473 --> 00:20:35,695
And so if you're a person who is responsible for making courses,
229
00:20:36,223 --> 00:20:42,630
a learning designer, instructional designer, how do we address this?
230
00:20:42,630 --> 00:20:52,240
How do we address this pattern to help people engage more deeply, not just verify, to stay
kind of in the moment with the things they're engaged with?
231
00:20:52,770 --> 00:20:57,413
So I'm not an ID person, so I don't know how the courses eventually get built.
232
00:20:57,413 --> 00:20:59,635
But I will explain my thought process here.
233
00:20:59,635 --> 00:21:11,481
If you are somebody who has been working in a specific field with significant experience,
then it is OK that you get AI to do the work and you play the role of a verifier.
234
00:21:11,481 --> 00:21:16,103
That means that you are doing your work much more faster and much more efficient manner.
235
00:21:16,624 --> 00:21:18,674
You are not sure you are playing
236
00:21:18,674 --> 00:21:24,474
the role of a team lead to say 15 team members or 15 AI agents, which is alright.
237
00:21:24,514 --> 00:21:36,534
But if the objective of the training department is also to create a funnel of leaders who
are going to take up the mantle say in next 2-3 years and currently you are given a team
238
00:21:36,534 --> 00:21:47,430
of say junior resources or people with say less than 2 years of work experience, how do
they build the domain understanding or enough of
239
00:21:47,430 --> 00:21:57,014
domain understanding that they are building their expertise, they are building that level
of intuition so that they can then therefore review the output given by AI.
240
00:21:57,014 --> 00:21:58,635
That is the challenge.
241
00:21:58,956 --> 00:22:09,874
so what historically used to happen is that you join a company as a junior resource and
you had the sufficient amount of time where in which you start by doing the repetitive
242
00:22:09,874 --> 00:22:16,297
task for say six months, one year, and then you start doing more of a repetitive task.
243
00:22:16,297 --> 00:22:21,551
And at the end of a 12 month, 15 month period, you get to understand why that repetitive
task makes sense.
244
00:22:21,551 --> 00:22:30,477
And therefore, what that task contributes to the business objective of the company or the
segment that you are part of.
245
00:22:30,477 --> 00:22:39,757
But what AI does today is that because AI can do or shortchange that 12 month of learning
into a few seconds or a few prompts, right?
246
00:22:39,757 --> 00:22:47,517
Junior resource then becomes just copy pasting the AI response and feeding into the next
step or next stage.
247
00:22:47,537 --> 00:22:58,197
So he or she is not really developing an intuition and therefore not building on the
ability to judge AI output on a long-term basis.
248
00:22:58,197 --> 00:23:09,484
So if as an L &D professional or as a CXO who is looking to build a culture, we build a
long-term business which is going to sustain for the next 10, 15, 20 years.
249
00:23:09,484 --> 00:23:21,270
You are not really doing good by having the same old approach what you followed say 10-15
years ago for learners who are coming in system today.
250
00:23:21,510 --> 00:23:23,331
What is the right solution towards it?
251
00:23:23,331 --> 00:23:30,455
Now I can only hypothesize, like for example you can probably give more projects to them
so that they understand the why behind what they are doing.
252
00:23:30,455 --> 00:23:31,187
But I think
253
00:23:31,187 --> 00:23:34,767
You need to experiment a lot at this point of time to figure it out for you.
254
00:23:34,767 --> 00:23:43,707
Because I think the answer depends on a lot of things, including what part of the world
you're coming from, what industry you are in, what is the business objective of the
255
00:23:43,707 --> 00:23:44,627
organization.
256
00:23:44,627 --> 00:23:52,174
So probably you can factor in all those things and then find the answer that works for you
at that particular stage of the company or the face of the company.
257
00:23:52,174 --> 00:23:53,114
That's great.
258
00:23:53,555 --> 00:24:02,335
you have asked the question, what gets lost for us when speed and output become the
primary measure of success?
259
00:24:03,147 --> 00:24:04,308
So I'm going ask you that question.
260
00:24:04,308 --> 00:24:05,820
What's your answer to that question?
261
00:24:05,820 --> 00:24:10,074
What does get lost when speed and output become the primary measure of success?
262
00:24:10,074 --> 00:24:17,110
So when speed and output becomes primary measure, I think you lose out on people who are
foundationally strong.
263
00:24:17,110 --> 00:24:27,037
And that foundational skills are important on a long-term basis, especially because unless
your foundational knowledge, foundational understanding of your business, your industry,
264
00:24:27,037 --> 00:24:30,250
your segment that you're part of, you are never able to...
265
00:24:30,250 --> 00:24:37,726
catch the problems in the air response or the variations in air response.
266
00:24:37,726 --> 00:24:46,293
But habitually, over a period of last many years, we are used to rewarding people for
speed and agility in the way they work.
267
00:24:46,293 --> 00:24:52,041
But what we should also realize is that, is it really creating a learning beyond what is
supervision?
268
00:24:52,041 --> 00:24:53,915
And I believe in most of the cases,
269
00:24:53,915 --> 00:25:01,560
It might be just building skills at a superficial level and not allowing for the skills to
have the depth that it requires.
270
00:25:01,560 --> 00:25:05,923
So I think that is going to be the fundamental challenge going forward.
271
00:25:05,923 --> 00:25:15,987
it also becomes that you are not only redesigning and relooking your L &D plan, but you
are also relooking your performance metrics and your reward system so that you are
272
00:25:15,987 --> 00:25:19,202
enabling the right learning culture and therefore the overall
273
00:25:19,202 --> 00:25:20,644
the public culture.
274
00:25:20,644 --> 00:25:30,680
This takes us a little bit back to what you something you said before about human biology,
that you went back, you studied some things that maybe you had looked at years ago, but
275
00:25:30,680 --> 00:25:35,803
you looped back to it because you felt it was so relevant to where we are right now.
276
00:25:35,803 --> 00:25:39,745
um This intersection of, yeah.
277
00:25:39,745 --> 00:25:41,710
um
278
00:25:41,710 --> 00:25:44,950
was COVID, the first phase of COVID.
279
00:25:45,570 --> 00:25:50,430
So at that point of time, I was in Bangalore, my wife was in Perth in UK.
280
00:25:50,550 --> 00:26:00,430
And she was telling us that there was this young chap in her team who was probably one of
the best developer that she has seen.
281
00:26:00,650 --> 00:26:06,262
And he had one of the first casualty in the first phase of COVID.
282
00:26:06,527 --> 00:26:15,867
Now one interesting point that she told us while she said he was brilliant in coding, he
did not actually pass away because of COVID.
283
00:26:15,867 --> 00:26:20,387
He actually passed away because he had not eaten for many days.
284
00:26:21,107 --> 00:26:27,527
This is despite the fact that there were couple of ready to eat meals packets available in
his house.
285
00:26:27,527 --> 00:26:31,467
So what happened was that he was staying in apartment with his colleagues.
286
00:26:31,467 --> 00:26:35,804
So before the COVID lockdown happened, his colleagues moved to the hometown and he was
left alone.
287
00:26:35,804 --> 00:26:36,697
He did not know how to.
288
00:26:36,697 --> 00:26:41,828
because he did not know how to cook, he had the raw materials but he starved himself to
death.
289
00:26:41,828 --> 00:26:45,419
I think he also had some health conditions which complicated things for him.
290
00:26:45,419 --> 00:26:47,461
Also that actually got me thinking.
291
00:26:47,461 --> 00:26:55,485
even if I am the best at what I do, if I don't have the supporting competencies, am I
going to be productive at a long-term basis?
292
00:26:55,485 --> 00:27:00,106
And I think we can see good enough analogies in sports.
293
00:27:00,106 --> 00:27:02,468
Now I don't know enough personalities in...
294
00:27:02,468 --> 00:27:14,639
basketball or soccer that you may relate to but from a cricket there are characters,
individuals who have come shown so much of promise but they just fizzled out because they
295
00:27:14,639 --> 00:27:25,398
did not have the right character, they did not show the right attitude, they did not show
the right discipline for them to be selected after the first few matches or first few
296
00:27:25,398 --> 00:27:27,109
series to represent the country.
297
00:27:27,109 --> 00:27:28,402
So now if you have to
298
00:27:28,402 --> 00:27:32,582
consider that in an employment scenario.
299
00:27:33,202 --> 00:27:46,442
Earlier you are probably the best salesperson in your company but you were rude with your
colleagues, you would not cooperate with anybody else, were more like a bully to your team
300
00:27:46,442 --> 00:27:47,282
members.
301
00:27:47,302 --> 00:27:51,762
And the company probably would close its to because you were bringing in the revenue.
302
00:27:52,082 --> 00:27:56,458
But now what AI has done is that AI can do a lot of things that you are doing.
303
00:27:56,627 --> 00:28:04,369
The question is that what is that you need to be doing to ensure that you are still
relevant in the overall scope of things.
304
00:28:04,369 --> 00:28:14,551
That means that you are not only a good person or at least good working professional but
the collateral aspects of who you are.
305
00:28:14,551 --> 00:28:16,313
That means you need to have a good health.
306
00:28:16,313 --> 00:28:19,214
We are picking up, you need to have good discipline.
307
00:28:19,214 --> 00:28:24,115
We are picking up lot of the bad habits of
308
00:28:24,613 --> 00:28:27,094
workplace which have impact on workplace.
309
00:28:27,094 --> 00:28:30,369
For example, the amount of screen time that you all have.
310
00:28:30,369 --> 00:28:37,643
It's very stupid to expect that just because I'm not using mobile at workplace means that
I'm more attentive at workplace.
311
00:28:37,643 --> 00:28:38,453
No.
312
00:28:38,514 --> 00:28:49,462
You are using a lot of screen time when you're doing commute at home which is already
impact your ability to focus which extends to your performance at work as well.
313
00:28:49,462 --> 00:28:50,374
Or the
314
00:28:50,374 --> 00:28:51,675
there's a mobile app feature, right?
315
00:28:51,675 --> 00:28:58,841
When you make a payment, the message comes to you, the OTP get generated and the app is
automatically reads.
316
00:28:58,901 --> 00:29:06,148
Now from a user point of view, you may think it's faster, it's convenient, but what it
does is that it is impact your short-term memory.
317
00:29:06,148 --> 00:29:14,236
Over a period of say two, three years, your ability to retain facts for a short-term is
get compromised and that also access to your workplace.
318
00:29:14,236 --> 00:29:16,952
So when AI is doing all these things,
319
00:29:16,952 --> 00:29:25,509
What remains with you as the biggest competitive advantage is your ability to review and
judge, judgment, critical thinking.
320
00:29:25,530 --> 00:29:33,277
And that, if you are in a meeting and you need to respond fast, you cannot always then
Google or use AI for the facts.
321
00:29:33,277 --> 00:29:38,703
Then you take your sweet time to apply your mind, your logic to come to a response.
322
00:29:38,703 --> 00:29:42,867
You should be able to give that response at an instant level.
323
00:29:42,867 --> 00:29:43,877
So that...
324
00:29:43,954 --> 00:29:50,756
ability to get again compromised because you are doing so much of other things outside of
work which is impacting your performance at work.
325
00:29:50,756 --> 00:30:00,240
that's the so all these things when I start realizing for myself I of course there were
enough research out in the the public space about this but in some cases I started doing
326
00:30:00,240 --> 00:30:02,048
it experimenting on myself as well.
327
00:30:02,048 --> 00:30:05,632
Okay if I do these things I'm able to see some visible
328
00:30:05,688 --> 00:30:09,608
qualitative in my own way of judging it, I may improving it there.
329
00:30:09,608 --> 00:30:15,048
So once I start seeing some slight positives, I started doing more and more research.
330
00:30:15,048 --> 00:30:21,488
That's how the entire narration of work and life outside work came to picture.
331
00:30:21,708 --> 00:30:28,968
your human biology becomes important, human thinking becomes important, our ability to,
our cognitive thinking becomes important.
332
00:30:28,968 --> 00:30:34,779
So I started to see all this together so that as humans we are more productive.
333
00:30:34,779 --> 00:30:47,619
This actually dovetails perfectly with my last question here, which is you've identified
three big shifts that we're in right now.
334
00:30:47,959 --> 00:30:51,219
I'm kind of curious to hear your take on all three of these.
335
00:30:51,219 --> 00:30:54,279
One is from institutions to individuals.
336
00:30:54,439 --> 00:30:56,979
The second is from courses to systems.
337
00:30:56,979 --> 00:31:01,539
And the third is from knowledge to judgment, which you've just talked about here for a
second.
338
00:31:01,915 --> 00:31:16,794
um Some of these feel difficult for us to redesign our organizations for, to teach people
how to think in terms of systems or to apply judgment over just accessing knowledge.
339
00:31:16,794 --> 00:31:23,938
And from this dependency on institutions to more of a self-reliance, self-reliance as an
individual.
340
00:31:23,938 --> 00:31:29,970
But I'm curious if you could kind of unpack the three of those a little bit more, because
those shifts are interesting.
341
00:31:30,894 --> 00:31:40,517
Okay, I think before I start, I think it's important to understand or question the
definition of organization or company to start with.
342
00:31:40,517 --> 00:31:50,561
The moment you are asked a question of defined organization, it's most likely that at some
point of the definition, we will write that it's a huge company with employing hundreds of
343
00:31:50,561 --> 00:31:58,224
thousands of people, making billion dollars of revenue, working in say, 10 different large
markets of the world.
344
00:31:58,585 --> 00:32:02,726
But that reality is true only for few people.
345
00:32:02,726 --> 00:32:07,637
As organization, I might still be a billion dollar company, but employ only two people.
346
00:32:08,429 --> 00:32:09,714
Now the question of
347
00:32:09,714 --> 00:32:21,798
what is the role of learning and development or skill in that such a company, verse-versus
a traditional company which is running for last 50-60 years, is already a billion dollar
348
00:32:21,798 --> 00:32:26,639
but is it going to be there for the next 5 years, 10 years, 50 years, I don't know.
349
00:32:27,560 --> 00:32:34,022
So we need to ask those questions and contextualize the definition of organization for
yourself and then look at these shifts.
350
00:32:34,022 --> 00:32:35,872
So when I'm looking at moving
351
00:32:36,133 --> 00:32:39,224
from institutions to individuals, the learning.
352
00:32:39,905 --> 00:32:51,411
With this amount of layoffs happening and also the biggest impact I feel that AI is having
on workforce is not the layoffs that is created.
353
00:32:51,411 --> 00:32:52,523
I think that is the...