درباره این اپیزود
Ever feel like grammar turns a lively class silent? We dig into a brighter way forward with literacy consultant and author Patty McGee, exploring how short, focused routines transform grammar from rote correction into a set of powerful choices that make writing clearer, bolder, and more authentic. Instead of chasing perfection on worksheets, we show how to build sentence craft in tiny, joyful steps that actually transfer to real writing.
We start by naming the problem: isolated drills don’t move the needle on student prose. From there, Patty lays out a practical grammar study approach—ten-minute mini lessons, three to five times a week over several weeks—that begins with curiosity, moves to explicit modeling, and leans on low-stakes play. Think manipulatives for language: sentence strips, coordinating conjunctions, and structured challenges that help students feel how ideas combine and meaning shifts. The result is confidence, not compliance.
We also put culture to work. Lyrics function like compressed poetry, perfect for analyzing syntax, figurative language, and voice. Students compare fragments with full sentences, expand lines while preserving tone, and reflect on author intent. Then we make the learning stick with co-authored reference tools that students actually use: clear guides to simple, compound, and complex sentences, when to choose each, and how to build them inside drafts they’ve already written. It’s visible progress without the fear of a blank page.
Transfer matters across the day. Science benefits from precise simple sentences and selective compounding; social studies often calls for complex structures that signal cause and nuance. We touch on AI as well—how students can compare their drafts with AI feedback, accept what serves their audience, and reject what doesn’t, because they now understand the grammar choices behind strong writing. Ready to retire the grammar police mindset and bring back joy and clarity? Follow the show, share it with a colleague, and leave a review to help more educators find these ideas.
Not Your Granny's Grammar, link here!
💡 This episode is CPD accredited! Educators can now earn Continuing Professional Development (CPD) minutes by listening. To claim your certificate:
- Listen to the full episode
- Visit https://thecpd.group/podcast
- Enter code 800160 to check in and download your certificate
Listen. Learn. Earn.
Great News! The Brighter Side of Education is now CPD Accredited!
Sponsored by Dr. Gregg Hassler Jr., DMD
Trusted dental care for healthy smiles and stronger communities—building brighter futures daily.
Head to the show notes to find if this episode is CPD eligible and details on how to claim your CPD certification!
Sponsored by Dr. Gregg Hassler Jr., DMD
Trusted dental care for healthy smiles and stronger communities—building brighter futures daily.
If you have a story about what's working in your schools that you'd like to share, email me at lisa@drlisahassler.com or visit www.drlisahassler.com. Subscribe, tell a friend, and consider becoming a supporter by clicking the link: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2048018/support.
The music in this podcast was written and performed by Brandon Picciolini of the Lonesome Family Band. Visit and follow him on Instagram.
یادداشت ها را نشان دهید 🔗
رونوشت 🔗
00:00:19.059 --> 00:00:24.339
Writing is one of the most cognitively demanding tasks that we ask our students to do.
00:00:24.500 --> 00:00:31.299
Pair that with grammar instruction that hasn't changed much since your grandparents were in the classroom, and you get a recipe for avoidance.
00:00:31.460 --> 00:00:43.219
Today we're exploring engaging approaches to grammar and writing instruction that remove the shame and stigma often attached to the grammar police mindset and instead bring joy, clarity, and confidence back.
00:00:51.859 --> 00:00:57.060
Welcome to the brighter side of education, research, innovation, and resources.
00:00:57.219 --> 00:00:58.019
I'm your host, Dr.
00:00:58.099 --> 00:01:05.700
Lisa Hassler, here to enlighten and brighten the classrooms in America through focused conversation on important topics in education.
00:01:05.939 --> 00:01:12.420
In each episode, I discuss problems we as teachers and parents are facing and what people are doing in their communities to fix it.
00:01:12.579 --> 00:01:13.859
What are the variables?
00:01:13.939 --> 00:01:17.379
And how can we duplicate it to maximize student outcomes?
00:01:17.780 --> 00:01:28.100
For decades, research has shown that isolated grammar instruction in the form of worksheets, memorization, and correcting errors out of context does not improve student writing.
00:01:28.340 --> 00:01:34.420
Students may perform well on grammar exercises, but those skills rarely transfer into authentic writing.
00:01:34.579 --> 00:01:37.939
Organizations like the Writing Revolution have emphasized this for years.
00:01:38.100 --> 00:01:46.340
Their approach centers on explicit instruction in sentence structure, embedded directly into content learning, not as a separate grammar program.
00:01:46.579 --> 00:01:56.500
The book, The Writing Revolution, written by Judith Hotchman and Natalie Wexler, expanded these principles into a structured framework that helps teachers apply these strategies across grade levels.
00:01:56.659 --> 00:02:00.579
And that's exactly what our guest Patty McGee helps teachers achieve.
00:02:00.820 --> 00:02:07.939
As an educator and literacy consultant, Patty's work focuses on simplifying and energizing writing and grammar instruction.
00:02:08.099 --> 00:02:18.019
Her books, feedback that moves writers forward, and writers workshop made simple offer practical, research-aligned ways to strengthen student writing without overwhelming them.
00:02:18.259 --> 00:02:29.379
Her newest book, Not Your Granny's Grammar, reimagines grammar as something powerful, joyful, and fully connected to writing, building student confidence through small, meaningful shifts.
00:02:29.539 --> 00:02:31.620
Patty, welcome to the brighter side of education.
00:02:31.860 --> 00:02:32.819
Thank you for having me.
00:02:33.060 --> 00:02:41.300
So, how did you start to get into grammar instruction and to reimagine how it can be designed?
00:02:41.539 --> 00:02:57.379
Well, this is a decades-long creation of when I was a first-year, second-year teacher, and I was doing a lot to grow my literacy block and my instruction in the literacy block and opportunities for students.
00:02:57.460 --> 00:03:03.860
And I was starting to see growth from my perspective, both in my instruction and in students.
00:03:04.020 --> 00:03:12.659
And then when we got to the obligatory grammar instruction, it was just a black hole within my literacy block.
00:03:12.819 --> 00:03:19.219
It just sucked all the life and interest and engagement out of both me and the students.
00:03:19.379 --> 00:03:21.379
And I was like, there has to be a better way.
00:03:21.539 --> 00:03:36.180
And it's 31 years later, and I finally have like something where I feel really confident that it's cohesive and simple, and that the engagement that I've seen with students with this approach has been really quite remarkable.
00:03:36.500 --> 00:03:40.500
Your book, Not Your Granny's Grammar, I absolutely love the title.
00:03:40.659 --> 00:03:48.420
You have an outline that helps teachers move beyond just drills and memorization towards a more meaningful grammar study approach.
00:03:48.500 --> 00:04:00.020
And I truly appreciate that because I taught the younger ones in definitely drills and memorization, which is never applicable in reality when they go to transfer that knowledge.
00:04:00.259 --> 00:04:06.340
So, what should teachers keep from traditional grammar instruction and what should they let go of?
00:04:06.659 --> 00:04:11.300
And what kind of new additions make grammar instruction more relevant and effective today?
00:04:11.620 --> 00:04:17.060
So, number one, I we want to have as educators a mindset shift.
00:04:17.219 --> 00:04:30.259
In the days of Granny's grammar, there were experiences like identification, memorization, filling out worksheets, and then there was immediate expectation of perfect usage.
00:04:30.420 --> 00:04:38.740
And when it wasn't perfectly used, there was no time to learn, like there is in many other areas of that we can be learning in.
00:04:38.980 --> 00:04:39.939
It was corrected.
00:04:40.100 --> 00:04:41.220
Everything was corrected.
00:04:41.379 --> 00:04:52.500
And that type of approach to grammar instruction, that like fill out a worksheet, immediate expectation, and then correcting it just isn't how most people learn.
00:04:52.740 --> 00:04:54.259
So many did.
00:04:54.420 --> 00:05:02.259
I mean, there was there are a fraction of teachers who feel really strong in terms of their grammar know-how.
00:05:02.500 --> 00:05:15.860
But I have found in my experiences and some informal research that I've been doing that the majority of teachers do not feel comfortable with grammar and therefore makes it very hard to teach.
00:05:16.019 --> 00:05:37.220
And so if we shift our mindset to we don't have to know everything about grammar, and that students having multiple entry points to learning grammar and practicing and playing with grammar, that through that over time, multiple entry points, we see that kind of growth happening.
00:05:37.459 --> 00:05:44.660
If we think of the like a painter's paintbrush, that is similar to what grammar is for a writer.
00:05:44.899 --> 00:05:57.379
And when you think about it, that painter really never stops experimenting and learning about different brush sizes and strokes and different ways of creating on the page.
00:05:57.620 --> 00:05:58.980
Same goes for grammar.
00:05:59.139 --> 00:06:09.780
It's not something that we're going to learn perfectly forever unless perhaps we're a copywriter and we have a set of rules that we're following from a certain organization.
00:06:10.100 --> 00:06:12.500
But really, grammar is style.
00:06:12.660 --> 00:06:15.300
Grammar is making meaning on the page.
00:06:15.620 --> 00:06:21.459
And we use grammar differently depending on our audience, depending on what we're writing.
00:06:21.620 --> 00:06:28.500
And so those are some big shifts in thinking, but also shifts in experience for students.
00:06:28.660 --> 00:06:29.699
That is very helpful.
00:06:29.860 --> 00:06:38.420
So what I did was I started to think what is missing from grammar instruction that other learning experiences include.
00:06:38.660 --> 00:06:44.100
Oftentimes I think about what am I doing to learn something, but not in school?
00:06:44.259 --> 00:06:46.899
Like what are the natural things that I do as a learner?
00:06:47.060 --> 00:06:52.660
One of the things I love to do is refinish furniture with chalk paint and waxes.
00:06:52.819 --> 00:07:10.420
And I started by just getting curious about these paints and these waxes and then reaching out to experts that have stores that teach this, or I would look at videos, I would look for feedback, like I did this little bit, what do you think?
00:07:10.660 --> 00:07:16.740
And then I would experiment a lot before I actually put paint to furniture.
00:07:16.980 --> 00:07:20.339
And I often would pause and reflect like, how did that work?
00:07:20.500 --> 00:07:22.740
What is it that I still want to learn?
00:07:23.139 --> 00:07:24.660
What is it that I know for sure?
00:07:24.819 --> 00:07:36.180
And yes, I memorize, I memorize different combinations of colors and ways of applying the waxes and all of that, but it's only one part of my learning process.
00:07:36.420 --> 00:07:48.339
So another shift for us as educators is thinking about how many entry points are we giving into grammatical concepts for students to grow that grammar know-how.
00:07:48.579 --> 00:07:53.620
And so one of those entry points is the 10-minute mini lesson, mighty.
00:07:53.780 --> 00:07:55.860
So simple, clear, and powerful.
00:07:56.100 --> 00:07:58.500
Those really give us a nice little entry point.
00:07:58.579 --> 00:08:01.139
You're coming in, you're coming out, you're making it fun.
00:08:01.540 --> 00:08:09.300
How can teachers use a short 10-minute grammar study routine to make grammar instruction both manageable and meaningful?
00:08:09.540 --> 00:08:15.459
Well, first of all, we want this to happen in tiny snippets across time.
00:08:15.780 --> 00:08:24.579
So we call our approach grammar study because the same way I study these paints and waxes, I want the same entry points for students.
00:08:24.819 --> 00:08:32.500
And so we can have 10 minutes three to five times a week over, say, six weeks with a few related concepts.
00:08:32.659 --> 00:08:50.659
I recommend starting this approach, and it doesn't have to start at the beginning of the year, it can start whenever we choose, but we start with sentences, simple, compound, and complex sentences and compare them, learn how to build them, learn how to combine and expand.
00:08:50.899 --> 00:09:02.579
And through different experiences, one of them is the explicit mini lesson where I'll teach you how to and say turning two simple sentences into a compound sentence.
00:09:02.819 --> 00:09:05.779
But before that, kids are already getting curious.
00:09:05.939 --> 00:09:07.699
I give them, I identify.
00:09:07.859 --> 00:09:11.219
Here are simple sentences, here are compound sentences.
00:09:11.379 --> 00:09:14.500
What do you see are the same and different about them?
00:09:14.739 --> 00:09:23.219
I just did this yesterday in a classroom and I heard lots of different things, lots of theories, and what is the same, what's different.
00:09:23.459 --> 00:09:33.539
And some of them were spot on, some of them were gesturing toward it, some of them were way off, but that doesn't matter because that wasn't a mastery moment.
00:09:33.859 --> 00:09:40.979
That was piquing our curiosity, just the same way that many science teachers begin a unit with phenomena.
00:09:41.139 --> 00:09:48.659
So we look, we get curious, and then we're ready for that explicit teaching of okay, here's what makes a simple sentence.
00:09:48.819 --> 00:09:51.379
And you need two of them to make a compound sentence.
00:09:51.459 --> 00:09:52.579
And I'm going to show you how.
00:09:52.739 --> 00:09:54.819
After that, we have time to play.
00:09:54.979 --> 00:09:57.779
And this might be my favorite part of this approach.
00:09:57.939 --> 00:10:04.979
It's not games where there's a winner or loser, it's grammar manipulatives, like the same concept we use in math.
00:10:05.139 --> 00:10:11.379
But this time we're using it in with grammar instruction where kids in partnerships play with certain concepts.
00:10:11.619 --> 00:10:14.979
The one that I taught with yesterday, I call Presto Chango.
00:10:15.219 --> 00:10:17.939
And that's where we started with simple sentences.
00:10:18.099 --> 00:10:23.059
And I gave students the fanboys or the coordinating conjunctions and a comma.
00:10:23.219 --> 00:10:30.099
And they had these sentence strips and they made multiple compound sentences using those manipulatives.
00:10:30.179 --> 00:10:32.739
So they weren't jumping right into their writing.
00:10:32.899 --> 00:10:34.899
There was that scaffold there for them.
00:10:35.219 --> 00:10:38.500
Yeah, I used to love doing centers with grammar.
00:10:38.739 --> 00:10:42.659
They've really gotten wonderful in the self-correcting puzzle pieces.
00:10:42.819 --> 00:10:46.819
There's a lot of ways to get kids excited about playing with it.
00:10:47.059 --> 00:10:52.339
So the things that you're doing, I just am so excited about because I just love to see joy and grammar.
00:10:52.579 --> 00:10:54.500
For instance, an article on Taylor Swift.
00:10:54.659 --> 00:10:56.419
I love this article.
00:10:56.739 --> 00:10:56.979
Okay.
00:10:57.139 --> 00:11:00.979
And you were talking about her lyrics, a Swifty, or what did you call it?
00:11:01.059 --> 00:11:02.659
A Faye of Tay or something.
00:11:03.299 --> 00:11:05.379
I think I had a bunch of different nicknames.
00:11:06.500 --> 00:11:07.059
Yeah.
00:11:07.379 --> 00:11:15.059
So you were talking about lyrics and how they can help students think more deeply about characters and author's intent and even their own writing.
00:11:15.299 --> 00:11:23.139
So, how can teachers use song lyrics like Taylor Swift's to help students analyze language and strengthen their understanding of grammar and craft?
00:11:23.379 --> 00:11:29.699
I really believe that one of the things that helps us learn grammar well is comparison.
00:11:30.019 --> 00:11:52.899
Taking song lyrics is like looking at poetry and thinking about the author's intent and their use of different types of elaboration, you know, the whole bucket of figurative language and how that can be pulled into our writing more conventionally and how they kind of complement each other.
00:11:53.219 --> 00:12:06.259
But I also like to take poems and add to them to see if we can turn the lyrics into full sentences that make sense and still have the integrity of the song.
00:12:06.419 --> 00:12:10.179
So it's a little brain teaser, but students do it together.
00:12:10.339 --> 00:12:14.659
What they come up with is entirely different from each other, but really fun.
00:12:14.979 --> 00:12:18.579
Many teachers have students who avoid writing or they shut down completely.
00:12:18.739 --> 00:12:28.899
And so, what advice do you have for re-engaging struggling or dormant writings as you refer to them and help them rebuild their confidence, especially when grammar feels overwhelming?
00:12:29.139 --> 00:12:29.459
Yes.
00:12:29.619 --> 00:12:42.339
Well, first following the grammar study approach, the last part of grammar study is co-creating reference tools that when we're writing, we can refer back to.
00:12:42.579 --> 00:12:46.739
So let's say we have simple, compound, and complex sentences.
00:12:46.979 --> 00:13:04.819
We have the six weeks and we've been following along with those different entry points that I described, including reflection, because that helps us know what uh students are kind of clinging to, that they're understanding, and also what's still a little bit confusing or what they wonder about, which are my favorites.
00:13:04.979 --> 00:13:07.219
And then we get to the point where we know enough.
00:13:07.459 --> 00:13:12.099
We're not going to know it all, but we know enough that we can co-create a tool.
00:13:12.259 --> 00:13:16.019
Maybe it's how to build those sentences or when to use them.
00:13:16.259 --> 00:13:18.659
The one I have in my book is a combination of both.
00:13:18.819 --> 00:13:22.979
And we use that to practice on writing that we've already written.
00:13:23.219 --> 00:13:27.619
Ideally, students would have some written from any subject area.
00:13:27.939 --> 00:13:38.739
And that little scaffold or stepping stone helps kids revise their writing intentionally, but it's also not the same pressure as starting from scratch.
00:13:38.899 --> 00:13:45.379
And so it helps with that application and it feels a little less daunting, a little less vulnerable.
00:13:45.699 --> 00:13:49.219
Can you give an example of that just to help me grasp it?
00:13:49.299 --> 00:13:49.619
Yeah.
00:13:49.939 --> 00:13:50.259
Yes.
00:13:50.579 --> 00:14:00.819
So a fourth grade classroom that was piloting this approach created a tool that said, okay, here's what a compound sentence looks like.
00:14:00.899 --> 00:14:06.019
Here are the times we might use a compound sentence, and here's how you can construct them.
00:14:06.259 --> 00:14:15.539
And then students went back into their writers' notebooks and just found an entry that they had in there, and they used their tool and their writing.
00:14:15.619 --> 00:14:18.579
And some kids even put like a line down the center.
00:14:18.739 --> 00:14:30.899
This is what it said, this is what it says now, or like had a page spread in their notebook, where the entry was, and then how this entry's been revised using the considering compound sentences.
00:14:31.219 --> 00:14:31.539
Nice.
00:14:31.619 --> 00:14:37.459
So now do they come up with what tools they feel that they need, or is there some guidance in that?
00:14:37.699 --> 00:14:39.219
Yeah, there's definitely guidance.
00:14:39.379 --> 00:14:46.579
It's something co-created through a process sometimes called shared writing and sometimes called co-authoring.
00:14:46.659 --> 00:14:48.099
And I like co-authoring.
00:14:48.179 --> 00:14:53.939
It takes a couple of days to finalize the tool, and we can always revise it as the year goes on.
00:14:54.259 --> 00:15:06.179
But having something that we've all had a hand in and knowing it well and not just being handed to them like an editing checklist or something like that, not to say those aren't good.
00:15:06.419 --> 00:15:12.019
It's just to say it may not remind kids how to use what we've learned.
00:15:12.259 --> 00:15:23.779
And so through the co-creation process as a class, in little snippets of time, then they have something that they can look to if it's up or pull out if it's nearby.
00:15:23.939 --> 00:15:35.139
And so that can really help with the grammar and writers who feel that very, very real sense of vulnerability that everyone who writes feels.
00:15:35.379 --> 00:15:36.500
Everybody feels something.
00:15:36.899 --> 00:15:37.139
Yes.
00:15:37.379 --> 00:15:43.299
So, how can those methods be used in different content areas where grammar isn't the main focus of instruction?
00:15:43.539 --> 00:15:52.419
Yeah, so very easily we can share these tools that have been co-created with other content areas.
00:15:52.659 --> 00:16:00.099
And I recommend to content area teachers not to worry about everything grammar, but to focus on one thing that's important to the content.
00:16:00.259 --> 00:16:12.259
And so let's say it's scientific writing and we want to make sure that complex sentences are used sparingly and compound sentences are used a little bit more often.
00:16:12.419 --> 00:16:17.779
And then simple sentences are often the ones that we might find are the most useful.
00:16:18.019 --> 00:16:30.739
And of course, as kids grow, they know and start to learn about different ways of using simple sentences that have length to them that are not compound or complex sentences, but can be chock full of information.
00:16:30.979 --> 00:16:43.539
As a content area teacher, if I have this tool and I want to make sure that students are focusing on sentence construction for meaning, I can focus on one little part and put that in my expectations.
00:16:43.939 --> 00:16:44.899
That's a really good idea.
00:16:45.059 --> 00:16:49.859
Do you see AI concerns with how kids are looking at grammar?
00:16:49.939 --> 00:16:51.219
Are you thinking about that?
00:16:51.459 --> 00:16:53.539
Yes, there's been a lot of ways.
00:16:53.619 --> 00:16:59.379
And at this current moment, AI does not capture our voices.
00:16:59.619 --> 00:17:01.059
No, at least 100%.
00:17:01.699 --> 00:17:15.059
You know, they try to sound like us, but really we're the deciders on what this grammar usage should look like because we have the audience in mind better than anything digital can.
00:17:15.220 --> 00:17:21.700
And so knowing grammar well, we can become critiques of something that is created using AI.
00:17:21.940 --> 00:17:30.419
We can do a side-by-side comparison, we can draft something, give it to AI to look at, look at their suggestions, compare them to what we have.
00:17:30.579 --> 00:17:33.379
And if we like them, we might take them and revise.
00:17:33.460 --> 00:17:34.740
And if I don't, I don't.
00:17:34.899 --> 00:17:35.220
Yeah.
00:17:35.379 --> 00:17:40.899
And so it's just a quicker way for me to get feedback than asking a human.
00:17:41.139 --> 00:17:49.059
Well, and I think also as adults, we don't necessarily have someone that's uh giving us feedback, uh, you know, or that we can bounce ideas off of.
00:17:49.220 --> 00:17:56.339
So for listeners who want to know more about grammar study and your work, where can they find your resources and your book, not your granny's grammar?
00:17:56.579 --> 00:18:02.740
Well, a first stop would be my website, which is patty with a why,micgee.org.
00:18:02.899 --> 00:18:09.220
I always specify the why because there's Patty McGee with an I, who was a very famous skateboarder.
00:18:09.379 --> 00:18:09.539
Yes.
00:18:09.700 --> 00:18:11.700
So I thought it was me at first.
00:18:12.500 --> 00:18:14.259
I wish I had that kind of balance.
00:18:14.500 --> 00:18:15.299
Yeah, no.
00:18:15.700 --> 00:18:17.539
So it's Patty with a why.
00:18:17.619 --> 00:18:21.940
And then there's a place to order the books on my books page.
00:18:22.099 --> 00:18:22.339
Okay.
00:18:22.579 --> 00:18:29.220
And if you use the code SAVE20, it'll go save 20% off and give you free shipping.
00:18:29.379 --> 00:18:31.700
And it's also on Amazon and Barnes and Obles.
00:18:32.259 --> 00:18:32.740
Wonderful.
00:18:32.899 --> 00:18:33.379
Wonderful.
00:18:33.539 --> 00:18:38.659
Well, thank you so much for bringing such joy to grammar and writing instruction.
00:18:38.899 --> 00:18:40.259
Thank you for having me.
00:18:40.500 --> 00:18:46.980
If you enjoyed this episode, share with a colleague who deserves a little more joy and less grammar policing moments in their day.
00:18:47.299 --> 00:19:00.419
If you have a story about what's working in your schools that you'd like to share, you can email me at Lisa at dr lisaarhassler.com or visit my website at www.drlisaarhassler.com and send me a message.
00:19:00.659 --> 00:19:03.460
If you like this podcast, subscribe and tell a friend.
00:19:03.700 --> 00:19:06.259
The more people that know, the bigger impact it will have.
00:19:06.419 --> 00:19:13.539
And if you find value to the content in this podcast, consider becoming a supporter by clicking on the supporter link in the show notes.
00:19:13.779 --> 00:19:20.099
It is the mission of this podcast to shine light on the good in education so that it spreads, affecting positive change.
00:19:20.259 --> 00:19:24.980
So let's keep working together to find solutions that focus on our children's success.