00:00:00,780 --> 00:00:02,040
Brian F. Tankersley, CPA.CITP, CGMA: Ryan,
welcome to the accounting
2
00:00:02,040 --> 00:00:07,200
Technology Lab sponsored by CPA
practice advisor, with your
3
00:00:07,200 --> 00:00:14,100
hosts, Randy Johnston and Brian
Tankersley, hi everybody. It's
4
00:00:14,100 --> 00:00:16,980
Brian, working hard at the lab
today, but I thought I would let
5
00:00:16,980 --> 00:00:20,240
you know that do have a quick
announcement? We have a
6
00:00:20,240 --> 00:00:23,780
giveaway. We're going to be
giving away one Rico, scan, snap
7
00:00:23,780 --> 00:00:27,020
IX, 2500 receipt edition. We're
going to draw. We're going to
8
00:00:27,020 --> 00:00:30,980
make the drawing right after
April 30. No purchase required.
9
00:00:30,980 --> 00:00:35,960
Suggested Retail value, $599
this is a one has one touch
10
00:00:35,960 --> 00:00:38,900
simplicity, and our friends at
Rico graciously provided it to
11
00:00:38,900 --> 00:00:43,120
us with automatic invoice OCR,
detachable receipt guide for
12
00:00:43,120 --> 00:00:47,020
small and curl documents and
lightning fast, 45 page a
13
00:00:47,020 --> 00:00:50,380
minute, duplex scanning. It
transforms paperwork into clean,
14
00:00:50,380 --> 00:00:53,020
searchable digital data in
seconds. If you want to
15
00:00:53,020 --> 00:00:58,720
register, it's CPA te.ch/scan
snap. The rules are at CPA
16
00:00:58,720 --> 00:01:03,240
te.ch/rules and the privacy
policy is at CPA, te.ch,
17
00:01:04,200 --> 00:01:07,500
forward, slash, scanner, dash,
privacy. And for those of you
18
00:01:07,500 --> 00:01:10,680
attending the video, attending
the video version of this, I've
19
00:01:10,680 --> 00:01:15,300
actually put on the screen now a
QR code that you can capture and
20
00:01:15,300 --> 00:01:20,900
use to register for the for the
again, for the scanner. Giveaway
21
00:01:21,140 --> 00:01:23,420
again. We're giving one away.
We're going to give it away
22
00:01:23,480 --> 00:01:28,880
again right after April 30 and
again. You must, you must be an
23
00:01:28,880 --> 00:01:32,240
accounting professional when all
the rules again are at CPA te
24
00:01:32,240 --> 00:01:38,480
CH, CPA te.ch/rules so anyway,
with that, thanks for joining
25
00:01:38,480 --> 00:01:40,240
us, and here we are back in the
lab.
26
00:01:41,140 --> 00:01:43,060
Randy Johnston: Welcome to the
accounting Technology Lab. I'm
27
00:01:43,060 --> 00:01:46,780
your host, Randy Johnston, with
co host Brian Tankersley, and we
28
00:01:46,780 --> 00:01:51,220
are so pleased to have a guest
today, Eric eager. Now, I've
29
00:01:51,220 --> 00:01:55,180
known Eric for 20 plus years
from his old days at a
30
00:01:55,180 --> 00:01:59,200
predecessor company which we'd
recommended to you, biznet, but
31
00:01:59,200 --> 00:02:02,340
about seven or eight years ago,
Eric reached out to me and said,
32
00:02:02,340 --> 00:02:06,240
You know, I've got a new idea.
And I listened to him, and I
33
00:02:06,240 --> 00:02:09,300
said, you know, Eric, you could
be playing golf. And he said,
34
00:02:09,300 --> 00:02:13,080
No, I want to make a difference.
I want to help small businesses
35
00:02:13,080 --> 00:02:16,200
succeed, and I've got a great
idea to do it. It turns out, I
36
00:02:16,200 --> 00:02:19,860
think he did, and over the last
years, he's been building a
37
00:02:19,860 --> 00:02:25,400
platform called for impact data,
the number four impact data,
38
00:02:25,580 --> 00:02:28,700
Eric, welcome to our podcast
today. Would you like to give a
39
00:02:28,700 --> 00:02:30,920
little bit of introduction on
yourself now?
40
00:02:30,980 --> 00:02:32,960
Eric Eager: Great, Ray, thank
you for having me on the show
41
00:02:33,020 --> 00:02:39,740
again. I am a CPA, and I feel
like we been working on this
42
00:02:39,740 --> 00:02:42,820
challenge of, how do we change
the odds for business owners,
43
00:02:42,880 --> 00:02:47,800
and then at the same time, how
do we elevate the profession and
44
00:02:47,800 --> 00:02:50,980
recognize the work and the
impact that we have on
45
00:02:50,980 --> 00:02:55,840
businesses? And so we've been
working really hard on this. How
46
00:02:55,840 --> 00:03:00,240
do we help the shift to
advisory? And I think that we
47
00:03:00,240 --> 00:03:04,860
have broken the code, cracked
the code, as they say, and we'll
48
00:03:04,860 --> 00:03:09,000
talk more about it, but, man, we
are super excited to tell people
49
00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:11,700
more about it and help the
transformation in the
50
00:03:11,700 --> 00:03:12,360
profession.
51
00:03:12,900 --> 00:03:15,060
Randy Johnston: Very good. Well,
for our dedicated listeners, you
52
00:03:15,060 --> 00:03:17,940
may recognize that Brian and I
have recorded a session on for
53
00:03:17,940 --> 00:03:22,340
impact data in the past, but oh
my, it is so different.
54
00:03:22,580 --> 00:03:24,680
Brian F. Tankersley, CPA.CITP, CGMA: So,
you know, Brian, it was like
55
00:03:24,680 --> 00:03:25,100
four years
56
00:03:25,100 --> 00:03:29,600
Randy Johnston: ago, so
different. So, as you may know,
57
00:03:29,600 --> 00:03:34,220
has probably reviewed more small
accounting products than you
58
00:03:34,220 --> 00:03:38,360
have ever seen in the past. And
just to give you a perspective
59
00:03:38,360 --> 00:03:43,240
on that, you know, we go back to
the days of the peach trees. In
60
00:03:43,240 --> 00:03:50,020
fact, I was actually drawn into
a recent interview from the
61
00:03:50,020 --> 00:03:54,520
Privacy Forum, and I couldn't
believe that I heard an old
62
00:03:54,520 --> 00:03:58,660
lotus, 123, name. I didn't
realize he had helped found the
63
00:03:58,660 --> 00:04:02,940
Privacy Forum. But again, we're
lucky enough to have had the
64
00:04:02,940 --> 00:04:07,260
long haul with the some of these
very well known products of the
65
00:04:07,260 --> 00:04:10,740
past as well some of the new
products of today, so the
66
00:04:10,740 --> 00:04:14,700
digits, which we've done
podcasts on, and others. So
67
00:04:14,880 --> 00:04:19,080
we're really shifting from
transactional accounting and
68
00:04:19,080 --> 00:04:22,580
financial reporting into
something that is quite
69
00:04:22,580 --> 00:04:26,720
different. And you know, the
team at for impact data have
70
00:04:26,720 --> 00:04:31,160
landed on the term decision
intelligence, but it really
71
00:04:31,160 --> 00:04:36,140
probably evolved from a bit of,
I'll say, observation by Gartner
72
00:04:36,140 --> 00:04:40,600
Group. So Eric, I might ask you
to take a moment and just help
73
00:04:40,600 --> 00:04:44,440
our listeners understand what
decision intelligence is.
74
00:04:45,160 --> 00:04:48,460
Eric Eager: Well, it's going to
be, you know, here's the thing
75
00:04:48,520 --> 00:04:56,140
is that it is the next evolution
of AI, and it's not replacing
76
00:04:56,140 --> 00:05:00,300
AI. It's kind of the things that
we've we've been working on. And
77
00:05:00,300 --> 00:05:03,420
as you guys pointed out for the
last four or five years, and we
78
00:05:03,480 --> 00:05:06,540
didn't realize we were building
it. But what decision
79
00:05:06,540 --> 00:05:11,880
intelligence does is that it
takes the combination of AI,
80
00:05:12,720 --> 00:05:15,840
data science, business
intelligence and humans
81
00:05:15,900 --> 00:05:20,840
expertise, it literally gives
you the ability to codify the
82
00:05:20,840 --> 00:05:25,940
experiences of others, but the
differences here is that what AI
83
00:05:25,940 --> 00:05:30,860
is what they call probabilistic
and text driven. Decision
84
00:05:30,860 --> 00:05:33,920
intelligence is deterministic.
It will literally tell you
85
00:05:33,920 --> 00:05:39,140
statistically. Here are the best
actions to take, taking all
86
00:05:39,140 --> 00:05:43,120
things considered, and it
provides you an audit trail of
87
00:05:43,120 --> 00:05:48,880
how that decision was come to so
it is really this ability to
88
00:05:48,880 --> 00:05:54,640
take from probabilities and what
you think to literally what
89
00:05:54,640 --> 00:05:57,700
decisions are going to give you
the highest probability of
90
00:05:57,700 --> 00:05:58,360
success.
91
00:05:58,840 --> 00:06:00,780
Randy Johnston: And for those of
you who have attended a lot of
92
00:06:00,780 --> 00:06:04,440
our k2 events. You might recall
that over a decade ago, it was
93
00:06:04,440 --> 00:06:09,540
2015, and 16, we were presenting
heavily on data science, and for
94
00:06:09,540 --> 00:06:12,480
those of you where I actually
did your on site tech
95
00:06:12,480 --> 00:06:16,140
assessments, I frequently
recommended that you had a data
96
00:06:16,140 --> 00:06:20,040
scientist in that window. Now, a
lot of this AI that we're
97
00:06:20,040 --> 00:06:22,580
dealing with as you are,
probably also where it's been
98
00:06:22,580 --> 00:06:27,860
around since the late 50s. 1958
is when AI started. But many
99
00:06:27,860 --> 00:06:31,220
people think AI started when
chat GPT was released in
100
00:06:31,220 --> 00:06:34,460
November of 22 you know, his
granddaughter from New York
101
00:06:34,460 --> 00:06:38,540
says, grandpa, that not be the
plan. That is not the plan.
102
00:06:38,840 --> 00:06:42,340
That's not how it happened. But
in about 2010 we started seeing
103
00:06:42,340 --> 00:06:45,160
a lot of these pattern
recognition and pattern matching
104
00:06:45,160 --> 00:06:50,080
and machine learning and this
evolution into the reporting
105
00:06:50,080 --> 00:06:54,160
tools that Eric and his team
used because they took as their
106
00:06:54,160 --> 00:06:57,520
basis Power BI and wanted to
have drillable dashboards in
107
00:06:57,520 --> 00:07:01,080
some of the earliest models.
That was interesting, but it's
108
00:07:01,080 --> 00:07:05,460
now a combination of for
decision intelligence, all of
109
00:07:05,460 --> 00:07:09,240
these things, of AI and data
science and behavioral and so
110
00:07:09,240 --> 00:07:14,580
forth. So you know, Eric, I know
you've been looking at the
111
00:07:14,580 --> 00:07:16,980
Gartner content on this. What's
Gartner have to say
112
00:07:16,980 --> 00:07:19,740
Eric Eager: on this? Well,
Gartner says that, literally, if
113
00:07:19,740 --> 00:07:23,300
you haven't heard of decision
intelligence, you're going to
114
00:07:23,300 --> 00:07:27,020
hear quite a bit about it in the
coming years. And here's what it
115
00:07:27,020 --> 00:07:30,860
is, the reason being, and the
thing that I'm trying to help
116
00:07:30,860 --> 00:07:36,440
elevate is that while you're
hearing all this AI decisions,
117
00:07:37,100 --> 00:07:41,800
the challenge is that it is
incredibly powerful, but it's
118
00:07:41,800 --> 00:07:45,400
changed. The answers are
changing. Every time you ask a
119
00:07:45,400 --> 00:07:50,500
question, it is a black box. And
what's happening is that more
120
00:07:50,500 --> 00:07:53,980
and more as we move into
advisory in these other pieces,
121
00:07:54,400 --> 00:07:59,440
it is going to cause,
unbeknownst, what we call false
122
00:07:59,440 --> 00:08:03,420
confidence and advisory, and
they are projecting it's going
123
00:08:03,420 --> 00:08:06,960
to cause financial and
reputational loss simply from
124
00:08:06,960 --> 00:08:12,660
the fact of human bias, ability
of critical thinking and aos AI
125
00:08:12,660 --> 00:08:17,460
sycophancy, it is still as much
as they're trying it is going to
126
00:08:17,460 --> 00:08:22,580
please you. And 2030 Yeah, I'm
sorry, go ahead.
127
00:08:23,060 --> 00:08:24,320
Brian F. Tankersley, CPA.CITP, CGMA: So
effectively, we're going to be
128
00:08:24,320 --> 00:08:27,020
lemmings running off a cliff.
Because AI said, Hey, wouldn't
129
00:08:27,020 --> 00:08:30,440
it be a great idea if you ran
off a cliff Exactly?
130
00:08:30,439 --> 00:08:34,339
Eric Eager: Now, here's the
thing, though, AI, if managed
131
00:08:34,339 --> 00:08:40,219
correctly and you compliment it,
it will unleash capabilities
132
00:08:40,219 --> 00:08:44,319
that all the positives and the
excitement, and why I'm excited
133
00:08:44,319 --> 00:08:50,799
about it, and these models, by
2030 it will be five times more
134
00:08:50,799 --> 00:08:55,299
trusted. It will be faster in
governing decisions than
135
00:08:55,299 --> 00:08:58,779
ungoverned decisions. And this
is why you're going to hear
136
00:08:58,779 --> 00:09:02,339
these things, because, and I'll
talk a little bit about, you
137
00:09:02,339 --> 00:09:03,599
know, why is this happening?
138
00:09:04,080 --> 00:09:07,020
Randy Johnston: Well, but you
know, on that point, Eric, I
139
00:09:07,020 --> 00:09:11,040
think the good and bad we've
talked about that with past all
140
00:09:11,040 --> 00:09:14,700
technology can be used for good
or bad. But the bad number that
141
00:09:14,700 --> 00:09:21,620
we didn't quote for you is that
by 2027, 25% of the decisions
142
00:09:21,620 --> 00:09:26,480
will actually have financial
impact in a negative way. That's
143
00:09:26,480 --> 00:09:30,920
a big deal, because 2027 is a
lot closer than you might think
144
00:09:31,099 --> 00:09:33,439
Eric Eager: well, and I'm glad
you pointed that, Alex, that
145
00:09:33,439 --> 00:09:36,139
sometimes I forget we have audio
listeners and not video
146
00:09:36,139 --> 00:09:40,459
listeners. So yeah, thank you
for pointing it out, because
147
00:09:40,459 --> 00:09:44,139
that and I've heard and I've
talked to, you know, profession
148
00:09:44,139 --> 00:09:47,979
and AI leaders throughout the
world, and they say that number
149
00:09:47,979 --> 00:09:52,059
may be low, that it can be
significantly higher if we don't
150
00:09:52,059 --> 00:09:59,799
watch it. So I'm glad you point
that out and in. So why is this
151
00:09:59,799 --> 00:10:05,699
in? Important. Well, you know
what's happening is, AI, is the
152
00:10:05,699 --> 00:10:10,679
world and velocity of business
is accelerating way before it's
153
00:10:10,679 --> 00:10:14,879
happening so fast that we're all
having to react and do things
154
00:10:14,879 --> 00:10:18,479
well. Ai, you know, the way that
we make decisions today is that
155
00:10:18,479 --> 00:10:20,599
before you know, we have these
analysts that would bring
156
00:10:20,599 --> 00:10:23,659
reports to us, and as leaders,
we would take all this
157
00:10:23,719 --> 00:10:27,199
information and have to
prioritize and risk and see
158
00:10:27,199 --> 00:10:30,319
what's short term and long term,
and then you had to make the
159
00:10:30,319 --> 00:10:33,619
call, and then you go hand it
down to your operational team.
160
00:10:34,099 --> 00:10:37,219
Well, what AI? And the
excitement about AI, it is
161
00:10:37,219 --> 00:10:42,039
surfacing so many options now
that you're turbo charging your
162
00:10:42,039 --> 00:10:47,199
analyst? Well, what that's doing
is that now it is accelerating
163
00:10:47,319 --> 00:10:51,159
all these options to leaders,
and it still doesn't tell you.
164
00:10:51,279 --> 00:10:55,239
It doesn't give you the well,
all these options for my
165
00:10:55,239 --> 00:10:58,419
company, which one takes
precedence? What time do we need
166
00:10:58,419 --> 00:11:02,219
to implement? What's the trade
offs, if we do this versus this,
167
00:11:02,459 --> 00:11:07,019
I still have to make those
calls, and that's myself and my
168
00:11:07,019 --> 00:11:10,619
advisor. Because we're always
going to have the need for
169
00:11:10,619 --> 00:11:13,859
advisors. No matter what the
technology does, we're still
170
00:11:13,859 --> 00:11:16,379
going to need that human
advisor, and it's going to cause
171
00:11:16,379 --> 00:11:21,199
decision fatigue. And so all of
a sudden, we're going to make
172
00:11:21,199 --> 00:11:27,019
the call. And now, if you add in
AI agents to that, the speed of
173
00:11:27,019 --> 00:11:30,319
exit, the beauty of what Randy
said, the beauty of it is we can
174
00:11:30,319 --> 00:11:35,239
execute with such speed and
precision. But the challenge is
175
00:11:35,239 --> 00:11:38,659
that you may be heading towards
a brick wall, except now we're
176
00:11:38,659 --> 00:11:40,519
just going to do it 100 miles an
hour.
177
00:11:40,520 --> 00:11:46,540
Randy Johnston: Yeah. Yeah, so
the question is, bugger
178
00:11:46,540 --> 00:11:47,380
windshield, huh?
179
00:11:50,560 --> 00:11:53,320
Eric Eager: Well, we're going to
make sure that here's the thing,
180
00:11:53,320 --> 00:11:56,080
and this is the missing piece. I
want to give people hope that
181
00:11:56,140 --> 00:11:59,680
this unbridled power, I, like,
you know, like spider man, with
182
00:11:59,680 --> 00:12:03,300
great power, comes right, great
responsibility. Here's the
183
00:12:03,300 --> 00:12:07,800
thing, that there is some
excitement and that you add the
184
00:12:07,800 --> 00:12:10,860
layer of decision intelligence.
This is why you see Gartner and
185
00:12:10,860 --> 00:12:17,220
everybody. You add that as a
layer to complement your AI. And
186
00:12:17,220 --> 00:12:21,080
it does is it continuously
monitors. It helps you see the
187
00:12:21,080 --> 00:12:25,460
emerging risk. It sees the
opportunities. And now it's an
188
00:12:25,460 --> 00:12:28,520
augmentation of decision
confidence. It helps the
189
00:12:28,520 --> 00:12:33,740
advisors and leaders prioritize
actions, what timing, and it
190
00:12:33,740 --> 00:12:38,660
doesn't replace it. Now turbo
charges the advisor and oh, by
191
00:12:38,660 --> 00:12:41,200
the way, it raises the
confidence level of the
192
00:12:41,200 --> 00:12:46,180
decisions, and now the agents
can execute. So this can really
193
00:12:46,720 --> 00:12:50,740
have the impact that I think
we've all been wanting to help
194
00:12:50,800 --> 00:12:54,400
businesses with. And we will, we
really do have a chance to
195
00:12:54,400 --> 00:12:55,720
change the profession.
196
00:12:56,440 --> 00:12:58,300
Brian F. Tankersley, CPA.CITP, CGMA: So
effectively, this is the human
197
00:12:58,300 --> 00:13:01,740
in the loop, the advisor that is
serving as those Spartans at
198
00:13:02,160 --> 00:13:05,940
Thermopylae that are preventing
the hordes of bad ideas from
199
00:13:05,940 --> 00:13:08,220
coming to reality bingo.
200
00:13:08,280 --> 00:13:12,180
Eric Eager: And this is where I
think the this we have always
201
00:13:12,180 --> 00:13:15,900
been business advisors that the
CPA profession has always we've
202
00:13:15,900 --> 00:13:19,800
been what I want to call
invisible advisors. And this is
203
00:13:19,800 --> 00:13:22,640
our opportunity to really
showcase where we have been.
204
00:13:22,760 --> 00:13:25,520
Always. A lot of people get in
the profession because we really
205
00:13:25,520 --> 00:13:29,120
want to help businesses, but we
got so bogged down into in my
206
00:13:29,120 --> 00:13:33,200
history, you know, I'm a tax
guy, I got so bogged down that
207
00:13:33,200 --> 00:13:36,020
by the time I got everything
finished, I didn't have any time
208
00:13:36,020 --> 00:13:39,620
left to really help people. And
now I really think this is
209
00:13:39,620 --> 00:13:45,700
elevating. It's the grand
promotion for everybody. Now, a
210
00:13:45,700 --> 00:13:48,520
lot of people listening are
probably going, I still don't
211
00:13:48,520 --> 00:13:53,020
understand what's the difference
between AI and decision
212
00:13:53,020 --> 00:13:57,940
intelligence. So there's a lot
of things. AI is reactive. It
213
00:13:57,940 --> 00:14:02,160
only reacts when you ask it a
question, and it will answer
214
00:14:02,160 --> 00:14:05,520
questions. It's really text
oriented. But here's the thing,
215
00:14:05,580 --> 00:14:08,700
it's probabilistic. So what that
means is, every time you ask it
216
00:14:08,700 --> 00:14:10,980
a question, you'll get a
different answer. But the
217
00:14:10,980 --> 00:14:14,460
things, the most important thing
that everybody needs to listen
218
00:14:14,460 --> 00:14:19,020
and I think everybody gets it
operates in a black box. You
219
00:14:19,080 --> 00:14:22,580
don't know. So if you're growing
an advisory firm and you're
220
00:14:22,580 --> 00:14:26,480
going AI first, the challenge
you've got is that you may have
221
00:14:26,480 --> 00:14:31,040
10 advisors ask the same
question and get 10 different
222
00:14:31,040 --> 00:14:34,460
answers and oh, by the way,
here's the other thing your
223
00:14:34,460 --> 00:14:39,920
clients can punch in the same
queue and same prompt into AI is
224
00:14:40,280 --> 00:14:45,280
your advisors, inner decision
intelligence, it is now
225
00:14:45,340 --> 00:14:49,060
proactive. It's constantly
probing and seeing the emerging
226
00:14:49,060 --> 00:14:52,120
risk. But it's what we call
deterministic. So what that
227
00:14:52,120 --> 00:14:55,780
means is that, depending on the
same input, you will get the
228
00:14:55,780 --> 00:15:00,240
same output, and it continuously
learns, we call this code. Five
229
00:15:00,240 --> 00:15:04,260
wisdom. So it's continuously
learning, but that's that human
230
00:15:04,260 --> 00:15:08,400
advisor in the loop. It
literally tracks, hey, what
231
00:15:08,400 --> 00:15:12,000
worked, what didn't, and it
keeps the advisor in the loop
232
00:15:12,060 --> 00:15:16,980
for a point of context. And last
but not least, it gives you a
233
00:15:16,980 --> 00:15:19,920
complete audit trail. It's
transparent of how those
234
00:15:19,920 --> 00:15:22,760
decisions and literally we can
get in, it literally creates
235
00:15:22,760 --> 00:15:27,440
decision tokens. So at any point
in the you know, things go by,
236
00:15:27,920 --> 00:15:31,460
you can see how the decisions
were made. This is why I think
237
00:15:31,460 --> 00:15:34,820
the accounting profession will
be so excited about this
238
00:15:34,820 --> 00:15:38,900
possibility, because it fits
within our audit ability and
239
00:15:38,900 --> 00:15:43,540
tracing, but also increases
confidence of what advice we're
240
00:15:43,540 --> 00:15:44,440
giving the client.
241
00:15:45,820 --> 00:15:48,580
Randy Johnston: Yeah, in fact,
Eric, when you first showed this
242
00:15:48,580 --> 00:15:53,980
to me and the audit trails and
how you could track how the AI
243
00:15:53,980 --> 00:15:57,460
was making decisions in the
platform, and how it was showing
244
00:15:57,460 --> 00:16:01,620
things over a longer period of
time and so on. It's like, this
245
00:16:01,620 --> 00:16:06,240
is really smart, and, more
importantly, it is reproducible.
246
00:16:06,420 --> 00:16:10,380
So you know, your whole codified
wisdom is, I've watched your
247
00:16:10,380 --> 00:16:14,940
journey on this, Eric, over the
last few years, because it was
248
00:16:14,940 --> 00:16:19,380
some years ago that you came up
with this business GPS idea and
249
00:16:19,380 --> 00:16:25,040
use the cockpit in the aircraft
system, which, again, makes
250
00:16:25,040 --> 00:16:28,760
great sense. If you've ever
flown an airplane in particular,
251
00:16:28,760 --> 00:16:32,360
it makes all the difference in
the world and the way the GPS is
252
00:16:32,360 --> 00:16:37,160
work. But this decision
intelligence engine has several
253
00:16:37,160 --> 00:16:40,900
different tricks, as I would see
it to it, it's, can you explain
254
00:16:40,900 --> 00:16:42,280
that to our listeners?
255
00:16:42,640 --> 00:16:45,640
Eric Eager: Sure. So the
difference between, like I said,
256
00:16:45,640 --> 00:16:49,780
the difference between AI and
decision intelligence is it is
257
00:16:49,780 --> 00:16:53,680
continuously monitoring so it
has your financial operational
258
00:16:53,680 --> 00:16:57,820
data, and what it does is it
looks for signals and trends.
259
00:16:58,420 --> 00:17:01,980
And it's not just on one plane.
And literally looks across
260
00:17:01,980 --> 00:17:05,100
multiple planes for signals, so
it can see things happening
261
00:17:05,100 --> 00:17:09,180
months at a time, so it begins
to uncover these emerging risk
262
00:17:09,180 --> 00:17:12,540
and opportunities. Because, just
to kind of backtrack a little
263
00:17:12,540 --> 00:17:15,660
bit, even while we started doing
all this, is that we were
264
00:17:15,660 --> 00:17:18,840
wondering we took on this
gigantic challenge of why
265
00:17:18,840 --> 00:17:23,540
businesses are failing at 50%
you know, 50% are going to fail
266
00:17:23,540 --> 00:17:26,120
in the first five years. We hear
this over and over again. So we,
267
00:17:26,480 --> 00:17:29,660
I went to Randy and said, this
has got to change. How in this
268
00:17:29,660 --> 00:17:33,260
world does this continue to
happen? Well, that sent off a
269
00:17:33,260 --> 00:17:36,320
journey of why businesses were
failing. Well, they were
270
00:17:36,320 --> 00:17:39,200
failing, you know. And I'm sure
that a lot of listeners can
271
00:17:39,200 --> 00:17:42,820
think, well, it's cash flow. It
really came down to and I'm glad
272
00:17:42,820 --> 00:17:45,940
everybody's sitting down or
driving your car. It was because
273
00:17:46,060 --> 00:17:49,540
we don't know what we don't
know. And what happens is that
274
00:17:49,540 --> 00:17:53,080
we have to see and the primary
reason is that business owners,
275
00:17:53,320 --> 00:17:57,820
we see the risk too late, and we
make decisions after the fact,
276
00:17:57,820 --> 00:18:00,840
and then we point on the wrong
things. So what decision,
277
00:18:00,840 --> 00:18:03,720
intelligence, or this codified
wisdom, is to monitor where
278
00:18:03,720 --> 00:18:06,780
you're at, see what the road
ahead looks like, and reroute
279
00:18:06,780 --> 00:18:12,180
you to the destination so see
what signals are coming, see the
280
00:18:12,180 --> 00:18:17,820
emerging risk. Have the GPS kind
of thing is recommend the best
281
00:18:17,820 --> 00:18:22,280
routes to take. But here's the
magic, you always have an
282
00:18:22,280 --> 00:18:26,120
advisor in the loop. You have an
advisor going, let me measure
283
00:18:26,120 --> 00:18:29,540
these things and make a
recommendation. You know, work
284
00:18:29,540 --> 00:18:32,900
with the business leader, but
now you got confidence of how
285
00:18:32,900 --> 00:18:36,440
you came to those things. And
then you begin to track what
286
00:18:36,440 --> 00:18:40,420
actions were executed. Because
the other thing Gartner pointed
287
00:18:40,420 --> 00:18:45,580
out is that 80% of decisions
that are executed never get
288
00:18:45,580 --> 00:18:49,540
measured. So you get this teams
you execute and you don't
289
00:18:49,540 --> 00:18:53,440
measure it. So you have this
closed loop of working with your
290
00:18:53,440 --> 00:18:57,040
advisor, measuring what you
know, basically dead,
291
00:18:57,580 --> 00:19:00,900
documenting what actions were
taken in the system, and
292
00:19:00,900 --> 00:19:05,340
continuously measure those
outcomes, and then you learn
293
00:19:05,400 --> 00:19:10,140
what worked best, and then it
creates this closed loop, and
294
00:19:10,140 --> 00:19:14,760
think about that at scale. So
now, as entrepreneurs and this,
295
00:19:14,820 --> 00:19:18,540
you know, guardians, we all
don't have to make the same dumb
296
00:19:18,540 --> 00:19:23,120
mistakes over and over again. I
am a I have a PhD in dumb things
297
00:19:23,120 --> 00:19:29,660
to do in business, and so this
helps elevate everybody across
298
00:19:29,660 --> 00:19:32,900
the board, and it continuously
gets smarter, and it
299
00:19:32,900 --> 00:19:38,540
continuously helps us, guide us
and our clients of what's
300
00:19:38,540 --> 00:19:42,580
working and What works best, if
that makes sense to everybody,
301
00:19:43,060 --> 00:19:43,300
yeah.
302
00:19:43,300 --> 00:19:46,540
Randy Johnston: So this whole
strategy of trying to help
303
00:19:46,540 --> 00:19:51,100
business proactively decide, and
I was reflecting on your mention
304
00:19:51,100 --> 00:19:55,900
of KPIs, because I've been a fan
of KPIs since Harvard introduced
305
00:19:55,900 --> 00:20:00,540
those back in 1992 but the KPIs
were often in. Correctly
306
00:20:00,540 --> 00:20:04,020
selected, not measured, not
really the right things. It took
307
00:20:04,020 --> 00:20:06,840
me better part of 10 years to
get the right KPIs for my own
308
00:20:06,840 --> 00:20:09,480
nmgi business, and now I'm
thinking about it, saying, I
309
00:20:09,480 --> 00:20:13,440
wonder if I've still got the
right KPIs. But in effect, this
310
00:20:13,440 --> 00:20:17,520
is not automatically, but it is
surfacing the right KPIs, the
311
00:20:17,520 --> 00:20:20,280
right actions, and then
monitoring those after the fact,
312
00:20:20,280 --> 00:20:24,620
which is all a pretty big deal.
So in effect, then you said,
313
00:20:24,620 --> 00:20:29,600
scale. So can you explain how
this allows advisory to scale?
314
00:20:31,580 --> 00:20:33,740
Eric Eager: Well, that's a great
question, because the other
315
00:20:33,740 --> 00:20:37,100
thing too is, you guys, you
pointed it out. We've been after
316
00:20:37,100 --> 00:20:41,560
this, solving this problem for
about, you know, going on about
317
00:20:41,560 --> 00:20:46,420
five years now. Well, what we
discovered in this process and
318
00:20:46,420 --> 00:20:49,600
journey, because we were just
dogmatic, we were going to fix
319
00:20:49,600 --> 00:20:52,120
this problem, we were going to
solve this problem, how to help
320
00:20:52,120 --> 00:20:57,940
our profession. What we realized
is that the the whole
321
00:20:57,940 --> 00:21:01,500
profession, the reason that
we're struggling with moving to
322
00:21:01,500 --> 00:21:05,760
advisory. It's what we call a
confidence gap. And it's really
323
00:21:05,760 --> 00:21:10,320
and it makes sense, when you
look at it, is that you've got,
324
00:21:10,380 --> 00:21:15,300
you know, we, most people,
realize this is 75% of the
325
00:21:15,300 --> 00:21:19,560
partners in the profession right
now are retirement age. There is
326
00:21:19,560 --> 00:21:22,940
going to be a massive brain
drain knowledge walking out the
327
00:21:22,940 --> 00:21:27,380
door at the same time, you've
got this next generation of
328
00:21:27,380 --> 00:21:31,220
people with advisors. Here's the
confidence gap problem. I'm a
329
00:21:31,220 --> 00:21:35,180
young advisor, and I want to
start doing advisory Well, I've
330
00:21:35,180 --> 00:21:38,360
got a major client, a major tax
or audit client, a lot of
331
00:21:38,360 --> 00:21:41,260
revenue to the firm. I'm afraid
to make the wrong decision. I
332
00:21:41,800 --> 00:21:44,680
don't know if I have the
confidence to make that call. At
333
00:21:44,680 --> 00:21:49,360
the same time, the senior
partners are going, I man, we
334
00:21:49,360 --> 00:21:53,020
can't risk this. And so you have
the partners that all the
335
00:21:53,020 --> 00:21:55,180
knowledge is tight, and so
everything's going to go through
336
00:21:55,480 --> 00:21:57,940
them. The younger staff are
going, I don't want to make the
337
00:21:57,940 --> 00:22:00,600
call. So this, I'm going to get
this documented and all over the
338
00:22:00,600 --> 00:22:05,340
place, so it creates this huge
gap of I can't move forward and
339
00:22:05,340 --> 00:22:10,020
enter now, the bigger risk is
that now, all of a sudden, you
340
00:22:10,020 --> 00:22:13,020
know, I don't have confidence. I
don't wanna do this. Here's the
341
00:22:13,020 --> 00:22:16,500
bigger issue, is false
confidence. Now the younger
342
00:22:16,500 --> 00:22:20,160
staff and everybody's relying on
AI to give me decisions, and
343
00:22:20,160 --> 00:22:23,060
it's got different answers.
Doesn't prioritize operating
344
00:22:23,060 --> 00:22:27,140
black box. This is a huge risk,
because now I'd rather have low
345
00:22:27,140 --> 00:22:31,700
confidence than false
confidence. Enter the world of
346
00:22:31,700 --> 00:22:34,460
decision intelligence and ran.
I'm sure you have some thoughts
347
00:22:34,460 --> 00:22:36,560
on that. What do you think in
the profession?
348
00:22:36,860 --> 00:22:38,780
Randy Johnston: You've got me
headed down all sorts of
349
00:22:38,780 --> 00:22:43,480
different paths with you here,
Eric, because I've said on this
350
00:22:43,540 --> 00:22:47,980
podcast before that for advisory
to work, I used to think it took
351
00:22:47,980 --> 00:22:52,000
gray hair. And fact, the matter
is, it's the right tools that
352
00:22:52,000 --> 00:22:55,300
really make the difference. Kind
of number one, observation
353
00:22:55,720 --> 00:22:58,660
number two, the risk of the
firm, as you pointed out, is
354
00:22:58,660 --> 00:23:03,480
very high when I see CPA and
accountants who have great
355
00:23:03,480 --> 00:23:07,980
advisory skills. It's a
beautiful thing, but there's so
356
00:23:07,980 --> 00:23:12,300
many that have been so focused
on tax and audit because that's
357
00:23:12,300 --> 00:23:15,060
where they were making the
money. Didn't really have time
358
00:23:15,060 --> 00:23:19,860
to do these other tasks. Now, if
we can do this at scale, that's
359
00:23:19,860 --> 00:23:24,440
also another huge opportunity.
Then third, it Brian and I will
360
00:23:24,440 --> 00:23:28,460
continue to talk to you about
different advisory approaches
361
00:23:28,460 --> 00:23:32,300
that are out there. In my mind
right now, for impact data has
362
00:23:32,300 --> 00:23:38,000
the most scalable, logical,
repeatable advisory offering in
363
00:23:38,000 --> 00:23:42,220
the market. And you know, things
are changing quickly, but I can
364
00:23:42,220 --> 00:23:47,320
tell you, there's a lot of
discussion around advisory, of
365
00:23:47,320 --> 00:23:51,580
which I have labeled fake
advisory, where people are doing
366
00:23:51,580 --> 00:23:54,460
client accounting services and
financial reporting and thinking
367
00:23:54,460 --> 00:23:58,240
it's advisory, and it's not that
at all, or the opposite end of
368
00:23:58,240 --> 00:24:01,980
the spectrum, They're doing CFO
services, and it's not really
369
00:24:01,980 --> 00:24:07,860
advisory, either. So you know,
this whole tipping point is upon
370
00:24:07,860 --> 00:24:11,220
us. And you know, Eric, you've
just toned it again with the
371
00:24:11,700 --> 00:24:17,580
shift in labor that's going to
happen and all this loss of so
372
00:24:17,580 --> 00:24:22,160
much knowledge. I'm really
concerned about that as well.
373
00:24:22,340 --> 00:24:26,120
Now I think you've written a
paper on this topic as well, and
374
00:24:26,120 --> 00:24:29,900
I might encourage our listeners
to try to pick up that paper.
375
00:24:30,200 --> 00:24:33,260
It's called Why decision
intelligence will power the next
376
00:24:33,260 --> 00:24:37,220
generation of Cavs. And you
know, it's almost like, I wish I
377
00:24:37,220 --> 00:24:41,740
could have you take CAS out of
the title, Eric, but I do that.
378
00:24:41,800 --> 00:24:44,980
You know, many of our firms have
just been building these client
379
00:24:44,980 --> 00:24:49,120
accounting services operations,
and they're trying to extend it
380
00:24:49,120 --> 00:24:53,620
with advisory. And CAS and
advisory are getting all mixed
381
00:24:53,620 --> 00:24:56,440
up in the terminology. We're
almost gonna have to invent a
382
00:24:56,440 --> 00:24:59,200
new term. But you know, for the
moment, I'm going to go with
383
00:24:59,200 --> 00:25:01,020
decision Intel. Budgets for
advisory.
384
00:25:01,020 --> 00:25:03,720
Eric Eager: I think I like that.
So I like that. I may have to
385
00:25:03,720 --> 00:25:05,280
modify the title there.
386
00:25:05,460 --> 00:25:07,800
Randy Johnston: So final,
parting thoughts you might have
387
00:25:07,800 --> 00:25:09,060
for our listeners today, Eric,
388
00:25:09,120 --> 00:25:11,100
Eric Eager: you know, here's the
thing. There's a couple things,
389
00:25:11,100 --> 00:25:16,500
and there is an approach where
there is a lot of nervousness in
390
00:25:16,500 --> 00:25:21,020
the profession that our
traditional, you know, service
391
00:25:21,020 --> 00:25:26,840
line offerings are becoming much
more automated. The margins
392
00:25:26,840 --> 00:25:30,260
we're starting to see shrink.
We're starting to have, you
393
00:25:30,260 --> 00:25:33,380
know, it's beginning to
commoditize. And I know that
394
00:25:33,380 --> 00:25:37,220
people have said, I've heard
that storm. We've weathered that
395
00:25:37,220 --> 00:25:39,920
storm years before and
everything, but I've had the
396
00:25:39,920 --> 00:25:44,500
chance to work with Randy and
Brian and, you know, Barry,
397
00:25:44,500 --> 00:25:48,160
Milan song and Gary, a lot of
the leading professions, and
398
00:25:48,160 --> 00:25:53,680
they are all saying the storm is
coming, and it can be gloom and
399
00:25:53,680 --> 00:25:57,880
doom or excitement. And I'm on
the abundant side and saying
400
00:25:58,300 --> 00:26:03,840
this is an exciting time for us.
There is now we can unleash the
401
00:26:03,840 --> 00:26:07,680
power of our advisory
capabilities, our impact. And
402
00:26:07,680 --> 00:26:12,060
I'm going to say boldly that you
know that the accounting
403
00:26:12,060 --> 00:26:15,660
profession is going to change
the world, and I want to believe
404
00:26:15,660 --> 00:26:20,160
that. And so for those who want
to join the movement and join
405
00:26:20,340 --> 00:26:24,380
the bandwagon of this is an
exciting time. You know,
406
00:26:24,380 --> 00:26:27,140
download the white paper. I'd
love to continue having
407
00:26:27,140 --> 00:26:31,220
conversations, because I'm
excited about the opportunities
408
00:26:31,220 --> 00:26:34,220
that lie ahead for the
profession, because I really
409
00:26:34,220 --> 00:26:38,360
think there's no other
profession globally that can
410
00:26:38,360 --> 00:26:42,520
change the odds and have such an
impact on so many businesses
411
00:26:42,520 --> 00:26:46,420
globally, we just had to wait
for the technology to catch up,
412
00:26:46,480 --> 00:26:51,340
to shine a spotlight on the true
work that we've been doing for
413
00:26:51,340 --> 00:26:54,280
decades. Yeah, and so I
appreciate your time, and thanks
414
00:26:54,280 --> 00:26:56,980
for letting me have a
conversation today. So Brian,
415
00:26:56,980 --> 00:26:58,720
Randy Johnston: you've been
awful quiet today. Any other
416
00:26:58,720 --> 00:26:59,980
parting thoughts from either
side?
417
00:26:59,980 --> 00:27:02,700
Brian F. Tankersley, CPA.CITP, CGMA: Well,
I think it's very important to,
418
00:27:02,760 --> 00:27:06,420
you know, to address this
confidence gap that we have
419
00:27:06,420 --> 00:27:09,660
between the experienced partners
that have taken risks and have
420
00:27:09,660 --> 00:27:12,900
learned from them, and the
junior staff that are just
421
00:27:12,900 --> 00:27:15,180
trying to keep their, you know,
trying to figure out what their
422
00:27:15,180 --> 00:27:18,480
career looks like. Okay? And the
thing I would say here is that,
423
00:27:18,480 --> 00:27:20,780
first off, I think you're
absolutely right, Eric, that
424
00:27:21,080 --> 00:27:24,500
validating the data that comes
out of AI and having that human
425
00:27:24,500 --> 00:27:27,920
in the loop is an essential part
here. And I think that is a
426
00:27:28,040 --> 00:27:32,300
significant definition of what
advisory looks like to me, you
427
00:27:32,300 --> 00:27:34,880
know, because there is some
measurement here, you know, as
428
00:27:34,880 --> 00:27:38,120
this goes back, I mean, I think
about, I think I was fortunate
429
00:27:38,120 --> 00:27:41,620
enough to watch my great uncle
coach my father in
430
00:27:41,620 --> 00:27:44,980
entrepreneurship when I was a
kid. And one of the things I
431
00:27:44,980 --> 00:27:49,180
remember my great uncle saying
to my dad was, my great uncle
432
00:27:49,180 --> 00:27:52,420
was a very successful
entrepreneur and engineer, and
433
00:27:52,420 --> 00:27:55,480
has, you know, founded a
business that now has sales in
434
00:27:55,480 --> 00:27:58,960
the hundreds of millions of
dollars. I will say that the
435
00:27:58,960 --> 00:28:02,640
thing that was so cool about
what he said was that he said
436
00:28:02,640 --> 00:28:06,780
that, you know, if you make a
mistake, for God's sake, tell
437
00:28:06,780 --> 00:28:10,020
everybody about it, because we
don't want to make the same old
438
00:28:10,020 --> 00:28:13,980
mistakes. We want to make new
and interesting ones. And that's
439
00:28:13,980 --> 00:28:17,160
the thing. I think that's
critical for this, because, you
440
00:28:17,160 --> 00:28:21,440
know, you don't your part, your
partners are very quiet, and
441
00:28:21,440 --> 00:28:25,160
they don't share where they took
risks and explain that, and
442
00:28:25,160 --> 00:28:28,400
explain the thinking and explain
the calculus that's happening in
443
00:28:28,400 --> 00:28:31,400
the background. And these staff
are sitting out here, and it
444
00:28:31,400 --> 00:28:33,860
looks like, you know, the
partner is some Harry Potter
445
00:28:33,860 --> 00:28:37,640
here. No, he's taken a lot of
small chances over the years,
446
00:28:37,640 --> 00:28:41,200
increasingly bigger, and then
they, he or she's figured out
447
00:28:41,380 --> 00:28:46,420
that this is how we make, this
is how we do here. And the
448
00:28:46,420 --> 00:28:48,820
things is that we've all been
taught that accounting is black
449
00:28:48,820 --> 00:28:53,140
and white, but the reality of it
is that there are gambles that
450
00:28:53,140 --> 00:28:55,360
we have to take, just like when
you're playing chess, when
451
00:28:55,360 --> 00:28:58,720
you're playing any kind of game
with anybody. You know there is
452
00:28:58,720 --> 00:29:02,400
a risk associated with every
move you make, and the bet the
453
00:29:02,400 --> 00:29:06,540
easiest way to lose is to stop
going forward altogether. So
454
00:29:06,540 --> 00:29:10,080
very cool, Eric. I love what
you're doing, and I think it's I
455
00:29:10,080 --> 00:29:12,240
agree with you. I think the
accounting profession is going
456
00:29:12,240 --> 00:29:14,880
to change the world. I think
it's going to be different than
457
00:29:14,880 --> 00:29:18,060
we all think it is. But at the
end of the day, somebody's got
458
00:29:18,060 --> 00:29:22,160
to be like I said earlier, those
300 Spartans at Thermopylae that
459
00:29:22,160 --> 00:29:24,920
keep the hallucinations from
going through and turning into
460
00:29:24,920 --> 00:29:27,020
worse decisions than we could
ever dream
461
00:29:27,020 --> 00:29:31,160
Randy Johnston: up as humans. So
Brian and Eric, such a pleasure
462
00:29:31,160 --> 00:29:35,120
to spend time with you. So one
parting thought from my side
463
00:29:35,120 --> 00:29:39,800
today, we recognize how much is
going to change on the
464
00:29:39,800 --> 00:29:43,600
compliance side, and I can tell
you that this season just
465
00:29:43,600 --> 00:29:48,700
completed on AI tax has been a
pretty significant move. We're
466
00:29:48,700 --> 00:29:52,540
going to see transactions of all
kinds automated in client
467
00:29:52,540 --> 00:29:56,560
accounting services, in audit
and in tax. And what that will
468
00:29:56,560 --> 00:30:01,620
do for us is give us time for
these other. Activities, and to
469
00:30:01,620 --> 00:30:06,480
me, that's a really big deal. So
you're going to see me continue
470
00:30:06,480 --> 00:30:11,820
throughout the year to record my
recommend advisory platforms,
471
00:30:12,120 --> 00:30:15,060
and you'll start hearing me talk
more about the interstitium,
472
00:30:15,060 --> 00:30:18,060
because I think that's what the
accountants are to the
473
00:30:18,060 --> 00:30:23,300
profession. A delight having you
here today, join us again for
474
00:30:23,300 --> 00:30:25,760
another accounting Technology
Lab. Good day.
475
00:30:31,100 --> 00:30:32,480
Brian F. Tankersley, CPA.CITP, CGMA: Thank
you for sharing your time with
476
00:30:32,480 --> 00:30:35,960
us. We'll be back next Saturday
with a new episode of the
477
00:30:35,960 --> 00:30:40,700
technology lab from CPA practice
advisor. Have a great week.