WEBVTT
00:00:12.720 --> 00:00:17.519
Today we have three amazing topics for you on the Superintelligence Podcast.
00:00:17.679 --> 00:00:35.200
Number one is my individual unique take on what this AI governance really means and where it's going to destroy free speech and empower one political party over the other rather than self-regulation of the industry, as is favored by conservatives over the Democrat socialists of America.
00:00:35.439 --> 00:00:46.399
Number two, AI could very well create millions of jobs to fix that job displacement problem that seems to be panicking everybody across the board.
00:00:46.560 --> 00:00:54.640
And number three, I want you to consider that Gen A, Gen Z, and the younger millennials should love AI.
00:00:54.799 --> 00:00:58.320
They're never going to have to go back to work in the office ever again, right?
00:00:58.399 --> 00:01:04.560
They can work from home and love it all on this episode of Superintelligence.
00:01:04.799 --> 00:01:15.599
One of the reasons I find the argument against AI to be so disingenuous from younger generations is they seem to not want to work in an office.
00:01:15.760 --> 00:01:21.200
Since COVID, there's been something of a hostility toward working in an office building.
00:01:21.359 --> 00:01:35.280
Whether it is in New York City, Seattle in particular, Los Angeles, and other places, rural, suburban, big city or otherwise, there seems to be something of a rebellion against in-office work.
00:01:35.599 --> 00:01:42.319
AI essentially brings the world to you vis-a-vis a data center at record warp speed.
00:01:42.480 --> 00:01:55.280
It means that you probably in the future will not have to go into a workplace unless you are a professional athlete or unless you have some sort of collaborative team that requires you to visit that workplace.
00:01:55.439 --> 00:02:02.079
It is increasingly likely that AI will connect you to the world without you having to connect in person.
00:02:02.799 --> 00:02:08.719
This is, I know this sounds funny and punny, but this is something of an actual disconnect.
00:02:08.879 --> 00:02:32.800
But I thought that Gen Z, the younger millennials, and I thought that Gen A loves this idea, unless you're again in the food service industry or a hairstylist to the extent that robots have not been programmed to be our stylists and our teachers and everything else with this alleged featuristic universal high basic income, according to Eli Busk.
00:02:32.960 --> 00:02:38.240
If you are not going to have to travel anymore, that should reduce your travel costs.
00:02:38.400 --> 00:02:42.159
Reduce your reliance on those dreaded evil fossil fuels.
00:02:42.400 --> 00:02:44.400
Reduce carbon emissions.
00:02:44.719 --> 00:02:48.240
You might not even have to go to the grocery store anymore.
00:02:48.400 --> 00:03:14.400
Imagine 10 years from now, instead of having Instacart, and I am not claiming that their stock is going to tank or that their investors are going to suffer, but imagine that instead of having Instacart, you just have your AI predictions or your AI summaries given to you based upon your spending patterns and your shopping habits, and those AI predictions will purchase groceries for you to be dropped off by an electric vehicle driven by itself.
00:03:14.639 --> 00:03:15.840
No drivers necessary.
00:03:16.000 --> 00:03:19.919
Robots load the car or a conveyor belt loads the car en masse.
00:03:20.080 --> 00:03:23.120
This may be the future of transportation as well.
00:03:23.360 --> 00:03:31.680
If you do not have to go to an office place, which means that you have greater flexibility to work from home, is this not a major benefit of AI?
00:03:31.919 --> 00:03:36.960
One in particular that should appeal to the younger generations who are rebelling against it.
00:03:37.120 --> 00:03:41.759
And I really wonder if they've thought this through or if it's just good sloganeering.
00:03:42.080 --> 00:03:51.280
Sloganeering of AI is evil, it's about to take our jobs, it costs too much in the way of electricity, in the way of water, and it's polluting the environment.
00:03:51.360 --> 00:03:54.319
And let's combine it with global climate panic.
00:03:54.479 --> 00:04:08.400
Let's combine it with everything else we could possibly combine it with, in order to scare the heck out of people, to prevent it from ever going where it needs to go and evolving and disempowering everybody else at the same time.
00:04:08.639 --> 00:04:10.560
Think about it, younger generations.
00:04:10.719 --> 00:04:23.680
Think about the benefits of AI, and stop thinking about all of the doom fearing about it all, because it's going to drive you crazy, and then you're going to reject something that could very well enhance your lives and the lives of everyone around you.
00:04:23.839 --> 00:04:29.199
Get ready for a take that you've never heard before about AI or SI in politics.
00:04:29.360 --> 00:04:37.759
If you recall, my background academically, aside from law, is American politics and American foreign policy.
00:04:38.000 --> 00:04:40.319
To that extent, I want you to consider this.
00:04:40.560 --> 00:04:56.800
When we think about liberal socialism and communism versus free market capitalism, which is essentially modern Republican populists versus Democrat socialists, so-called socialists and communists, here is the distinction.
00:04:56.959 --> 00:05:24.879
If the Democrat Party and their thought leaders, to the extent that they have any thoughts at all, other than control, control, control, we control you, we control your lives, we control your health insurance, we control the economy, we control the means of production, we control what you watch, what you consume, who you talk to, what you hear, when you hear it, how you hear it, complete and utter government control, which we used to call kings and czars, and now we call socialism.
00:05:24.959 --> 00:05:25.839
It's wonderful.
00:05:26.000 --> 00:05:46.240
If the Democrat socialist, Bernie Sanders, AOC, who I think is a complete fool and manipulates people to an extent which I've never seen before, who are apparently weak-minded, AOC, Bernie Sanders, Mum Dummy in New York, these individuals are against AI.
00:05:46.399 --> 00:05:59.839
They want it to be regulated, they want people punished for advancing it, and they want other countries to surpass us and therefore conquer the United States and for the United States to be knocked out of paid and forced to be groveling as part of the international community.
00:06:00.079 --> 00:06:00.879
Consider this.
00:06:01.040 --> 00:06:11.360
If the Democrat socialists, again, I'm going to take them at their word, even if we do not believe they are actually socialists, they are reconstructionist communists.
00:06:11.519 --> 00:06:25.519
If the Democrat socialists believe and tell us that they want to stop AI from going and evolving and stop AI or SI from becoming something that is at breakneck pace, they wanted to just simply stop, period.
00:06:25.680 --> 00:06:29.839
Preserve everything as it is now, which used to be called conservatism, interestingly enough.
00:06:30.079 --> 00:06:35.360
Preserve everything as it is now, never look toward the future, and stop and forestall it all.
00:06:35.439 --> 00:06:51.759
So that way one party, the Democrat socialists, can control it all and tell everybody who can use it and what they can use it again, controlling the means of production, the means of production in this case being artificial intelligence or superintelligence, as it has now been named through executive order.
00:06:51.920 --> 00:06:54.800
If we are to consider all of this, think about this.
00:06:55.040 --> 00:07:08.000
The Democrat socialists do not want anybody to be, quote, rich other than the Democrat socialist leaders, which means that the only people that are allowed to be rich are those that support them, those that are in power, and those that empower them.
00:07:08.160 --> 00:07:10.000
Otherwise, you have to be poor.
00:07:10.160 --> 00:07:16.639
You have to be grouped together in a lower class where nobody earns more than the next guy, especially not the people that oppose them.
00:07:16.720 --> 00:07:18.480
They should earn the lowest of all the low.
00:07:18.720 --> 00:07:33.360
If that is the case, then of course they want to prevent people with means, with money, with influence in the other direction politically, they want to prevent the people that have the money currently from using AI.
00:07:33.600 --> 00:07:39.600
They want only AI to be used by the people that are in power in the means and manner in which they want.
00:07:39.759 --> 00:07:47.279
So if somebody earns$20,000, minimum wage is actually$32,000 starting in November in Florida, which is an astonishing thing.
00:07:47.439 --> 00:07:51.199
And I believe in Seattle, minimum wage is$45,000 a year now.
00:07:51.439 --> 00:07:53.120
This is going to cause other problems.
00:07:53.279 --> 00:07:55.199
Not the topic of today's discussion.
00:07:55.439 --> 00:08:10.079
If minimum wage is so high, the people earning minimum wage believe that they are entitled to minimum wage and that nobody else is entitled to earn more than they do, no matter what their contributions to society, because everything should be free.
00:08:10.240 --> 00:08:18.160
Capitalists are pigs, free markets are disgusting, and it leads to inequality, whatever that means in this instance.
00:08:18.399 --> 00:08:27.199
If that is the case, then the Democrat socialists want to use AISI in the exact same way, to quote, reduce the inequality of access to information.
00:08:27.360 --> 00:08:42.799
Because if you are able to regulate it as the Democrat Socialists, then you are able to tell people what information is valid, what information is not, and label everything else hate speech and prevent one side of the political aisle from ever having any influence or messaging ever again.
00:08:43.120 --> 00:08:45.919
This isn't going to stop the spread of AI.
00:08:46.000 --> 00:08:50.240
It's going to corrupt AI to the point where it cannot advance.
00:08:50.399 --> 00:09:01.759
Other countries will overtake us, and the means in which it is used in the United States is strictly for harsh regulatory political purposes to disempower political opponents and create a uniparty system.
00:09:02.000 --> 00:09:04.240
That is my individual unique take.
00:09:04.399 --> 00:09:06.000
Take it for what you will.
00:09:06.159 --> 00:09:22.159
I believe that is the intent of those calling for AI, SI, regulation, and they will tell you if you only ask them, and you can read it directly on their websites, you can hear it in their political messaging, even go to C-SPAN, have at it, feel free.
00:09:22.399 --> 00:09:23.679
This is what is happening.
00:09:23.919 --> 00:09:40.799
AI, data centers, and the construction of those data centers for all of these companies, for the anthropics, the open AIs, Google, Microsoft, all of this may lead to the creation of millions, not hundreds of thousands, millions of jobs.
00:09:40.960 --> 00:09:48.639
When we think about job displacement from AI, we are not thinking enough about job creation from AI.
00:09:48.960 --> 00:09:51.440
That is not being touted enough.
00:09:51.600 --> 00:09:54.240
Imagine if a million people lose their jobs.
00:09:54.320 --> 00:09:57.919
They might not want to transition to working for an AI data center.
00:09:58.080 --> 00:10:02.320
That salary might not be the equivalent necessarily of what they were making before.
00:10:02.480 --> 00:10:09.279
But if there are over a million jobs available, and that number could expand or decrease, of course, but it could also very well expand.
00:10:09.360 --> 00:10:26.399
If that is true, if we lose a million jobs in the next 10 years, but those million jobs are replaced, and those people are able to retrain and have long careers with AI data centers, which are not going away, and they're only going to proliferate and expand unless the government overregulates it, destroys the industry.
00:10:26.559 --> 00:10:28.000
Isn't that a major benefit?
00:10:28.240 --> 00:10:29.919
Chenson Yuang is correct.
00:10:30.159 --> 00:10:32.480
This isn't some doomsday scenario.
00:10:32.639 --> 00:10:40.159
This is something that could be a major benefit to the middle class and re-empower the middle class and reinvigorate the American economy.
00:00:12.720 --> 00:00:17.519
Today we have three amazing topics for you on the Superintelligence Podcast.
00:00:17.679 --> 00:00:35.200
Number one is my individual unique take on what this AI governance really means and where it's going to destroy free speech and empower one political party over the other rather than self-regulation of the industry, as is favored by conservatives over the Democrat socialists of America.
00:00:35.439 --> 00:00:46.399
Number two, AI could very well create millions of jobs to fix that job displacement problem that seems to be panicking everybody across the board.
00:00:46.560 --> 00:00:54.640
And number three, I want you to consider that Gen A, Gen Z, and the younger millennials should love AI.
00:00:54.799 --> 00:00:58.320
They're never going to have to go back to work in the office ever again, right?
00:00:58.399 --> 00:01:04.560
They can work from home and love it all on this episode of Superintelligence.
00:01:04.799 --> 00:01:15.599
One of the reasons I find the argument against AI to be so disingenuous from younger generations is they seem to not want to work in an office.
00:01:15.760 --> 00:01:21.200
Since COVID, there's been something of a hostility toward working in an office building.
00:01:21.359 --> 00:01:35.280
Whether it is in New York City, Seattle in particular, Los Angeles, and other places, rural, suburban, big city or otherwise, there seems to be something of a rebellion against in-office work.
00:01:35.599 --> 00:01:42.319
AI essentially brings the world to you vis-a-vis a data center at record warp speed.
00:01:42.480 --> 00:01:55.280
It means that you probably in the future will not have to go into a workplace unless you are a professional athlete or unless you have some sort of collaborative team that requires you to visit that workplace.
00:01:55.439 --> 00:02:02.079
It is increasingly likely that AI will connect you to the world without you having to connect in person.
00:02:02.799 --> 00:02:08.719
This is, I know this sounds funny and punny, but this is something of an actual disconnect.
00:02:08.879 --> 00:02:32.800
But I thought that Gen Z, the younger millennials, and I thought that Gen A loves this idea, unless you're again in the food service industry or a hairstylist to the extent that robots have not been programmed to be our stylists and our teachers and everything else with this alleged featuristic universal high basic income, according to Eli Busk.
00:02:32.960 --> 00:02:38.240
If you are not going to have to travel anymore, that should reduce your travel costs.
00:02:38.400 --> 00:02:42.159
Reduce your reliance on those dreaded evil fossil fuels.
00:02:42.400 --> 00:02:44.400
Reduce carbon emissions.
00:02:44.719 --> 00:02:48.240
You might not even have to go to the grocery store anymore.
00:02:48.400 --> 00:03:14.400
Imagine 10 years from now, instead of having Instacart, and I am not claiming that their stock is going to tank or that their investors are going to suffer, but imagine that instead of having Instacart, you just have your AI predictions or your AI summaries given to you based upon your spending patterns and your shopping habits, and those AI predictions will purchase groceries for you to be dropped off by an electric vehicle driven by itself.
00:03:14.639 --> 00:03:15.840
No drivers necessary.
00:03:16.000 --> 00:03:19.919
Robots load the car or a conveyor belt loads the car en masse.
00:03:20.080 --> 00:03:23.120
This may be the future of transportation as well.
00:03:23.360 --> 00:03:31.680
If you do not have to go to an office place, which means that you have greater flexibility to work from home, is this not a major benefit of AI?
00:03:31.919 --> 00:03:36.960
One in particular that should appeal to the younger generations who are rebelling against it.
00:03:37.120 --> 00:03:41.759
And I really wonder if they've thought this through or if it's just good sloganeering.
00:03:42.080 --> 00:03:51.280
Sloganeering of AI is evil, it's about to take our jobs, it costs too much in the way of electricity, in the way of water, and it's polluting the environment.
00:03:51.360 --> 00:03:54.319
And let's combine it with global climate panic.
00:03:54.479 --> 00:04:08.400
Let's combine it with everything else we could possibly combine it with, in order to scare the heck out of people, to prevent it from ever going where it needs to go and evolving and disempowering everybody else at the same time.
00:04:08.639 --> 00:04:10.560
Think about it, younger generations.
00:04:10.719 --> 00:04:23.680
Think about the benefits of AI, and stop thinking about all of the doom fearing about it all, because it's going to drive you crazy, and then you're going to reject something that could very well enhance your lives and the lives of everyone around you.
00:04:23.839 --> 00:04:29.199
Get ready for a take that you've never heard before about AI or SI in politics.
00:04:29.360 --> 00:04:37.759
If you recall, my background academically, aside from law, is American politics and American foreign policy.
00:04:38.000 --> 00:04:40.319
To that extent, I want you to consider this.
00:04:40.560 --> 00:04:56.800
When we think about liberal socialism and communism versus free market capitalism, which is essentially modern Republican populists versus Democrat socialists, so-called socialists and communists, here is the distinction.
00:04:56.959 --> 00:05:24.879
If the Democrat Party and their thought leaders, to the extent that they have any thoughts at all, other than control, control, control, we control you, we control your lives, we control your health insurance, we control the economy, we control the means of production, we control what you watch, what you consume, who you talk to, what you hear, when you hear it, how you hear it, complete and utter government control, which we used to call kings and czars, and now we call socialism.
00:05:24.959 --> 00:05:25.839
It's wonderful.
00:05:26.000 --> 00:05:46.240
If the Democrat socialist, Bernie Sanders, AOC, who I think is a complete fool and manipulates people to an extent which I've never seen before, who are apparently weak-minded, AOC, Bernie Sanders, Mum Dummy in New York, these individuals are against AI.
00:05:46.399 --> 00:05:59.839
They want it to be regulated, they want people punished for advancing it, and they want other countries to surpass us and therefore conquer the United States and for the United States to be knocked out of paid and forced to be groveling as part of the international community.
00:06:00.079 --> 00:06:00.879
Consider this.
00:06:01.040 --> 00:06:11.360
If the Democrat socialists, again, I'm going to take them at their word, even if we do not believe they are actually socialists, they are reconstructionist communists.
00:06:11.519 --> 00:06:25.519
If the Democrat socialists believe and tell us that they want to stop AI from going and evolving and stop AI or SI from becoming something that is at breakneck pace, they wanted to just simply stop, period.
00:06:25.680 --> 00:06:29.839
Preserve everything as it is now, which used to be called conservatism, interestingly enough.
00:06:30.079 --> 00:06:35.360
Preserve everything as it is now, never look toward the future, and stop and forestall it all.
00:06:35.439 --> 00:06:51.759
So that way one party, the Democrat socialists, can control it all and tell everybody who can use it and what they can use it again, controlling the means of production, the means of production in this case being artificial intelligence or superintelligence, as it has now been named through executive order.
00:06:51.920 --> 00:06:54.800
If we are to consider all of this, think about this.
00:06:55.040 --> 00:07:08.000
The Democrat socialists do not want anybody to be, quote, rich other than the Democrat socialist leaders, which means that the only people that are allowed to be rich are those that support them, those that are in power, and those that empower them.
00:07:08.160 --> 00:07:10.000
Otherwise, you have to be poor.
00:07:10.160 --> 00:07:16.639
You have to be grouped together in a lower class where nobody earns more than the next guy, especially not the people that oppose them.
00:07:16.720 --> 00:07:18.480
They should earn the lowest of all the low.
00:07:18.720 --> 00:07:33.360
If that is the case, then of course they want to prevent people with means, with money, with influence in the other direction politically, they want to prevent the people that have the money currently from using AI.
00:07:33.600 --> 00:07:39.600
They want only AI to be used by the people that are in power in the means and manner in which they want.
00:07:39.759 --> 00:07:47.279
So if somebody earns$20,000, minimum wage is actually$32,000 starting in November in Florida, which is an astonishing thing.
00:07:47.439 --> 00:07:51.199
And I believe in Seattle, minimum wage is$45,000 a year now.
00:07:51.439 --> 00:07:53.120
This is going to cause other problems.
00:07:53.279 --> 00:07:55.199
Not the topic of today's discussion.
00:07:55.439 --> 00:08:10.079
If minimum wage is so high, the people earning minimum wage believe that they are entitled to minimum wage and that nobody else is entitled to earn more than they do, no matter what their contributions to society, because everything should be free.
00:08:10.240 --> 00:08:18.160
Capitalists are pigs, free markets are disgusting, and it leads to inequality, whatever that means in this instance.
00:08:18.399 --> 00:08:27.199
If that is the case, then the Democrat socialists want to use AISI in the exact same way, to quote, reduce the inequality of access to information.
00:08:27.360 --> 00:08:42.799
Because if you are able to regulate it as the Democrat Socialists, then you are able to tell people what information is valid, what information is not, and label everything else hate speech and prevent one side of the political aisle from ever having any influence or messaging ever again.
00:08:43.120 --> 00:08:45.919
This isn't going to stop the spread of AI.
00:08:46.000 --> 00:08:50.240
It's going to corrupt AI to the point where it cannot advance.
00:08:50.399 --> 00:09:01.759
Other countries will overtake us, and the means in which it is used in the United States is strictly for harsh regulatory political purposes to disempower political opponents and create a uniparty system.
00:09:02.000 --> 00:09:04.240
That is my individual unique take.
00:09:04.399 --> 00:09:06.000
Take it for what you will.
00:09:06.159 --> 00:09:22.159
I believe that is the intent of those calling for AI, SI, regulation, and they will tell you if you only ask them, and you can read it directly on their websites, you can hear it in their political messaging, even go to C-SPAN, have at it, feel free.
00:09:22.399 --> 00:09:23.679
This is what is happening.
00:09:23.919 --> 00:09:40.799
AI, data centers, and the construction of those data centers for all of these companies, for the anthropics, the open AIs, Google, Microsoft, all of this may lead to the creation of millions, not hundreds of thousands, millions of jobs.
00:09:40.960 --> 00:09:48.639
When we think about job displacement from AI, we are not thinking enough about job creation from AI.
00:09:48.960 --> 00:09:51.440
That is not being touted enough.
00:09:51.600 --> 00:09:54.240
Imagine if a million people lose their jobs.
00:09:54.320 --> 00:09:57.919
They might not want to transition to working for an AI data center.
00:09:58.080 --> 00:10:02.320
That salary might not be the equivalent necessarily of what they were making before.
00:10:02.480 --> 00:10:09.279
But if there are over a million jobs available, and that number could expand or decrease, of course, but it could also very well expand.
00:10:09.360 --> 00:10:26.399
If that is true, if we lose a million jobs in the next 10 years, but those million jobs are replaced, and those people are able to retrain and have long careers with AI data centers, which are not going away, and they're only going to proliferate and expand unless the government overregulates it, destroys the industry.
00:10:26.559 --> 00:10:28.000
Isn't that a major benefit?
00:10:28.240 --> 00:10:29.919
Chenson Yuang is correct.
00:10:30.159 --> 00:10:32.480
This isn't some doomsday scenario.
00:10:32.639 --> 00:10:40.159
This is something that could be a major benefit to the middle class and re-empower the middle class and reinvigorate the American economy.
