درباره این اپیزود
Jessa and Nick continue analyzing the state prosecution of the police charged with beating Rodney King. They break down why the Court of Appeal issued an order to the trial court that said the legalese equivalent of ‘Why did you say that?’, Jessa makes “Jessa's Law” (and the controversial switch from wine to White Claw), and Nick freaks out about the lack of criteria for venue changes.
انگلیسی
ایالات متحده آمریکا
محتوای صریح
رونوشت 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
جستجوی اپیزودهای گذشته
اپیزودهای قبلی Getting Off را جستجو کن.
قسمت های دیگر در این پادکست
We are deviating from scheduled programming to discuss current events because we believe you cannot have a pulse, work in the criminal justice system, and not respond to what's happening in our country. Get involved. www.gofundme.com/f/georgefloydhttps://unicornriot.ninja/https://minnesotafreedomfu…
Is social media shaming a good thing? Does it function similarly to the way the criminal justice system does, or is it a whole different animal? Jessa and Nick get philosophical.
It's February 2nd 1922, and all of Hollywood is about to wake up and learn that William Desmond Taylor, the most famous film director in town, was murdered in his home last night. The investigation will shine a light on some of Hollywood's most scandalous affairs, backroom deals, and underground d…
The one where Jessa is pissed off.
What is Breonna's Law and will it make a difference? Why were the attempted homicide charges originally filed against her boyfriend dismissed? Listen here and find out.
سلب مسئولیت: پادکست و آثار هنری تعبیه شده در این صفحه متعلق به Getting Off است که متعلق به صاحب آن است و به Listen Notes، Inc وابسته یا تایید نشده است.
ویرایش
از کمک شما برای بروز نگهداشتن پایگاهدادههای پادکست سپاسگزاریم
