درباره این اپیزود
In this episode of Executive Edge, Simon welcomes Aaron Miller, Partner at Apollo Global Management and Chairman of Apollo Portfolio Performance Solutions, for a candid conversation on leadership, accountability, and the evolving role of the operating partner in private equity.
Drawing on his experience across consulting, global operations, and portfolio leadership, Aaron explains why operating partners must move beyond advice-giving toward true stewardship—owning outcomes, not just recommendations. He shares how Apollo has built a scalable, technology-enabled operating model, integrating data, AI, and repeatable playbooks to drive consistent value creation across its portfolio.
The discussion also explores what differentiates great leaders in moments of inflection. Aaron offers a powerful perspective on why many people love the title of leader, but far fewer love leadership itself—and why that distinction matters when building resilient organizations. From talent and culture to technology and execution, this episode offers a clear-eyed look at what modern leadership really requires in private equity and beyond.
یادداشت ها را نشان دهید 🔗
رونوشت 🔗
00:00:00.017 --> 00:00:03.077
Leadership's a function of who you put in the chair, not just for private equity,
00:00:03.077 --> 00:00:05.837
it's across the board. There's a lot of people that love to be leaders,
00:00:06.017 --> 00:00:07.717
but there's very few people that love leadership.
00:00:07.877 --> 00:00:11.277
On this episode of Executive Edge, Simon is joined by Aaron Miller,
00:00:11.577 --> 00:00:15.457
a private equity legend and partner in Apollo's private equity business.
00:00:15.677 --> 00:00:18.317
Operating partners are gonna have to become technology enabled.
00:00:18.537 --> 00:00:22.217
Technology, I think for a long time in the operating partner world has been
00:00:22.217 --> 00:00:23.757
something that's been done on the side.
00:00:23.917 --> 00:00:28.997
Aaron breaks down how consulting shaped his mindset, the evolution of operating
00:00:28.997 --> 00:00:34.417
partner roles, and how culture, leadership, and technology, especially AI,
00:00:34.697 --> 00:00:36.617
are reshaping private equity.
00:00:36.737 --> 00:00:40.857
In the operating role, you can have a board seat, but you're also providing advisory support.
00:00:41.037 --> 00:00:45.777
How do you kind of balance between those multiple roles in a way that's effective for the portfolio?
00:00:45.997 --> 00:00:49.417
You're not balancing the role, you're really fulfilling a certain role.
00:00:49.497 --> 00:00:52.337
I always frame it as this, when you're the operator, you're responsible for
00:00:52.337 --> 00:00:54.437
doing all the work and you're accountable for that outcome.
00:00:54.597 --> 00:01:00.197
Hi everyone, welcome to another episode of Executive Edge. Very excited to have
00:01:00.197 --> 00:01:08.697
with me an OG, someone who is highly respected and somewhat of a legend within the operator world.
00:01:09.743 --> 00:01:15.723
Economy and ecosystem, but very specifically within private equity, Aaron Miller.
00:01:15.903 --> 00:01:19.223
So excited to have you on, Aaron. Thank you for coming on. Thanks for having me.
00:01:19.363 --> 00:01:24.203
For anyone who doesn't know who Aaron is, Aaron is a partner in Apollo's private
00:01:24.203 --> 00:01:32.063
equity business and the chairman of Apollo Portfolio Performance Solutions, APPS for short.
00:01:32.243 --> 00:01:36.743
Apollo, again, for those who don't know, It was a very well-known American asset
00:01:36.743 --> 00:01:41.083
management firm within the private equity industry.
00:01:41.303 --> 00:01:48.563
Primarily invests in alternate assets with $840 billion of assets under management, AUM.
00:01:48.703 --> 00:01:54.643
Prior to joining Apollo in 2019, Aaron was the chief operating officer at Catalina
00:01:54.643 --> 00:01:58.123
Marketing, covering Europe, Asia, and the US.
00:01:58.403 --> 00:02:02.483
Prior to that, was the operating director at Berkshire Partners.
00:02:03.203 --> 00:02:07.763
Aaron spent over a decade at Bain & Company, and another senior partner from
00:02:07.763 --> 00:02:11.303
Bain & Company, someone I interviewed earlier this morning, another recording
00:02:11.303 --> 00:02:13.263
that will probably come out right before Aaron's.
00:02:13.923 --> 00:02:19.183
Early in his career, Aaron also held key product and operations leadership roles
00:02:19.183 --> 00:02:23.563
with companies such as General Mills, Serial Partners Worldwide,
00:02:23.983 --> 00:02:27.363
joint venture between General Mills and Nestle in the U.S.
00:02:27.403 --> 00:02:33.683
And in Latin America. Aaron served on the board of several Apollo Portfolio
00:02:33.683 --> 00:02:38.423
companies, which is standard for an operating partner within PE.
00:02:38.763 --> 00:02:43.563
But some of those companies include McGraw-Hill Education, Tech Data Corporation.
00:02:44.003 --> 00:02:47.603
Aaron received his MBA from Wharton, University of Pennsylvania,
00:02:47.883 --> 00:02:50.323
and has BS in chemical engineering.
00:02:50.683 --> 00:02:56.043
And anyone who hasn't done that, it is up there with aeronautic engineering
00:02:56.043 --> 00:02:59.303
as one of the most complicating technical degrees out there.
00:02:59.463 --> 00:03:01.183
From Northwestern University.
00:03:01.683 --> 00:03:06.203
And he is also fluent, not just obviously in English, but also in Spanish.
00:03:06.782 --> 00:03:10.802
And Portuguese. Thanks again for coming on Aaron. Thank you, appreciate the intro.
00:03:11.622 --> 00:03:16.242
So your experience as an operator, someone with an operator mindset,
00:03:16.822 --> 00:03:21.062
you know, consulting with clients, working in operations yourself all around
00:03:21.062 --> 00:03:26.762
the world, and then moving into the private equity industry.
00:03:27.202 --> 00:03:32.082
I've got my perspective, but I'd really, really be interested in hearing yours.
00:03:32.382 --> 00:03:34.002
Like what did you take from consulting?
00:03:34.914 --> 00:03:38.154
Really helped in being an operator and
00:03:38.154 --> 00:03:41.194
potentially what kind of conflicted like
00:03:41.194 --> 00:03:44.254
what did you have to unlearn from those skills in order
00:03:44.254 --> 00:03:47.194
to kind of be effective as a as a leader in industry and
00:03:47.194 --> 00:03:50.154
then in MPE yeah I think there's a couple things
00:03:50.154 --> 00:03:54.214
my consulting spirit was a little different than most I did the traditional
00:03:54.214 --> 00:03:59.154
strategy consulting role for about half the time I was at Bain and And I think
00:03:59.154 --> 00:04:05.174
that was tremendous with respect to teaching me how to structure ideas and to
00:04:05.174 --> 00:04:08.654
provide deeper thinking around a variety of issues.
00:04:08.834 --> 00:04:11.254
Back then, we were all pretty much generalistic things.
00:04:11.514 --> 00:04:17.434
But I spent five of those years, we created a separate legal entity called Bain
00:04:17.434 --> 00:04:22.374
Corporate Renewal Group, in which we were turning around distressed private equity assets.
00:04:22.374 --> 00:04:29.414
And I think that combination really forced me to really think more deeply about
00:04:29.414 --> 00:04:35.874
how to execute, you being strategic, but at the same time, how to execute with speed.
00:04:36.814 --> 00:04:39.954
And the phrase common phrase i use now people's running
00:04:39.954 --> 00:04:43.714
water through the pipes it's sort of how do you quickly develop
00:04:43.714 --> 00:04:47.554
a strategy but then quote-unquote run the waters through the pipes even in your
00:04:47.554 --> 00:04:51.314
head and with your teams so that when you start to execute you have a tremendous
00:04:51.314 --> 00:04:55.874
amount of confidence that you can execute with speed and accuracy and i think
00:04:55.874 --> 00:04:59.554
the combination of those two experiences where you know i got to serve as a
00:04:59.554 --> 00:05:03.554
coo of a couple of companies during that time that were private equity owned,
00:05:03.774 --> 00:05:06.034
but in very difficult financial straits.
00:05:06.874 --> 00:05:13.274
And at the same time, working with years before and years after large clients
00:05:13.274 --> 00:05:17.654
with strategy issues that required a little more deep patience and deeper thinking,
00:05:17.994 --> 00:05:22.634
I think the combination for me was unique and prepared me well for private equity.
00:05:22.754 --> 00:05:27.834
And in your roles that you've had recently as well, there's quite an interesting dynamic within...
00:05:28.891 --> 00:05:33.631
Being an operating partner, right? Because if you're a board member and it's
00:05:33.631 --> 00:05:37.311
a public company, perhaps there are certain roles, right?
00:05:37.471 --> 00:05:41.791
You don't generally take to be an investor. You've been hired into that board position.
00:05:41.971 --> 00:05:46.051
You could be a consultant, a senior advisor. You're then also independent.
00:05:46.411 --> 00:05:51.131
In the operating role, you can have a board seat. You can be connected to the
00:05:51.131 --> 00:05:57.771
team that made the original investment decision and perhaps decisions for later capital injections,
00:05:57.771 --> 00:06:03.611
but you're also providing advisory support to the C-levels to help them through
00:06:03.611 --> 00:06:05.791
some challenges that they might be facing.
00:06:05.911 --> 00:06:11.611
How do you kind of balance between those multiple roles in a way that's effective for the portfolio?
00:06:11.871 --> 00:06:16.071
Well, I think the first part for me, and I think this has developed over the
00:06:16.071 --> 00:06:20.131
course of time, I think the roles, you're not balancing the roles,
00:06:20.251 --> 00:06:22.351
you're really fulfilling a certain role.
00:06:22.471 --> 00:06:27.211
And that I think there are operations roles, and I always frame it as this.
00:06:27.211 --> 00:06:30.151
When you're the operator, you're responsible for doing all the work and you're
00:06:30.151 --> 00:06:31.251
accountable for that outcome.
00:06:31.431 --> 00:06:36.531
If you're an advisor, you're just responsible for doing work and giving advice.
00:06:37.711 --> 00:06:41.211
I see the operating partner role as what I call a steward.
00:06:41.918 --> 00:06:47.218
You're accountable for the outcomes. But if you do no work, hypothetically,
00:06:47.618 --> 00:06:51.918
hypothetically, no, I mean, it's not that people are looking for a deck from you.
00:06:52.078 --> 00:06:56.158
They're not looking for a set of materials or a set of analysis from you.
00:06:56.338 --> 00:06:57.738
They're looking for an outcome.
00:06:57.938 --> 00:07:02.218
And so you orient yourself in the operating partner role towards the outcome
00:07:02.218 --> 00:07:04.838
more than you orient yourself towards the advice.
00:07:05.158 --> 00:07:10.358
At the same time, you have to acknowledge that the operator is responsible for
00:07:10.358 --> 00:07:14.258
delivering that work and you're jointly responsible for the outcome.
00:07:14.518 --> 00:07:19.338
And I think when you step back and view it that way, you're not really striking a balance.
00:07:19.558 --> 00:07:23.298
You're letting all the players in the ecosystem play the role that they're supposed to play.
00:07:23.718 --> 00:07:27.798
You have a part, they have a part, and then let's not forget investment teams
00:07:27.798 --> 00:07:31.698
because investment teams have an oversight role in many regards,
00:07:31.698 --> 00:07:36.598
and they ultimately are responsible for the outcomes even at the same level
00:07:36.598 --> 00:07:37.938
as the management team and the CEOs.
00:07:38.138 --> 00:07:41.018
So once you understand that balance, then it's
00:07:41.018 --> 00:07:43.898
a matter of where do you fit yourself in and where can
00:07:43.898 --> 00:07:46.698
you add the most value and i think most of the time for
00:07:46.698 --> 00:07:49.658
me it's been a little much heavier leaning
00:07:49.658 --> 00:07:52.498
than purely advisory when i'm actually in the
00:07:52.498 --> 00:07:56.858
operating partner role and so i don't i don't find it difficult and i think
00:07:56.858 --> 00:08:00.898
people who really understand that this is what this job is don't necessarily
00:08:00.898 --> 00:08:06.238
find it that difficult either and has has that approach and then also the structure
00:08:06.238 --> 00:08:12.298
of as apps has has how's that evolved since you first got involved?
00:08:12.658 --> 00:08:18.818
Is that the significantly larger teams of the arm's length versus accountable
00:08:18.818 --> 00:08:23.278
kind of approach to oversight and support for the Portco's changed?
00:08:23.498 --> 00:08:27.138
It hasn't really. I think what's changed, the team has clearly grown.
00:08:27.820 --> 00:08:30.920
When we started, we had a team of five people.
00:08:31.300 --> 00:08:35.080
Most of those individuals we've had to, over the course of time,
00:08:35.180 --> 00:08:37.900
switch out. And so we have a team of 35 to 40 today.
00:08:39.560 --> 00:08:45.300
The team has really, the ethos and the psychology around the team hasn't really changed.
00:08:45.560 --> 00:08:53.000
We truly attempt to be partners to both the management team and to the investment
00:08:53.000 --> 00:08:58.340
teams. and the phrase we often used was it's a climber guide relationship.
00:08:58.780 --> 00:09:02.460
We are the guides. We have, whether it's technology expertise,
00:09:02.920 --> 00:09:04.460
it's operations expertise.
00:09:04.840 --> 00:09:08.340
It may be that we have expertise in certain areas of talent,
00:09:08.340 --> 00:09:11.500
or we may be generalists that help guide the team.
00:09:11.640 --> 00:09:17.120
But our job is to guide those executives up the climb and to put them first
00:09:17.120 --> 00:09:19.360
along with the investment team.
00:09:19.940 --> 00:09:25.920
And that ethos has remained today, which means we've had really highly,
00:09:26.140 --> 00:09:29.540
highly talented operators in our team across all sectors.
00:09:30.540 --> 00:09:35.580
Generalists, technology, talent, sourcing, but all who come to the table with
00:09:35.580 --> 00:09:39.060
this idea of being guides to others that are climbing.
00:09:39.440 --> 00:09:43.080
And I think that has been the common thread throughout.
00:09:43.380 --> 00:09:46.060
I think that also allows us to lean in a
00:09:46.060 --> 00:09:49.640
little more because we understand that
00:09:49.640 --> 00:09:52.380
we are not necessarily the ones that are
00:09:52.380 --> 00:09:56.820
responsible at the end of the day for making it happen but gosh darn it we better
00:09:56.820 --> 00:10:02.680
make sure that others are as prepared as possible to make that client so that
00:10:02.680 --> 00:10:07.720
that has not changed at all team is bigger functions we have eight functions
00:10:07.720 --> 00:10:10.340
today versus starting with one two.
00:10:11.275 --> 00:10:16.435
And the team now works in an integrated fashion. So if we need to address a
00:10:16.435 --> 00:10:21.955
really complex ESG issue, it may be that we're doing that in coordination with our data team.
00:10:22.095 --> 00:10:26.335
Or if we have a complex sourcing issue, that it may be our technology and our
00:10:26.335 --> 00:10:28.935
generalists who are working together in an integrated fashion.
00:10:29.295 --> 00:10:32.235
That has remained the same since day one. For me,
00:10:32.495 --> 00:10:39.575
it's a fascinating difference really behind private equity as a source of capital
00:10:39.575 --> 00:10:44.015
versus, you know, all the other groups out there, right, from venture capital
00:10:44.015 --> 00:10:46.755
to just traditional funding and banking.
00:10:46.755 --> 00:10:51.115
You know that added value that aligned
00:10:51.115 --> 00:10:54.095
interest right vested interest and also
00:10:54.095 --> 00:10:57.315
the leveraging of expertise within the advisory
00:10:57.315 --> 00:11:02.695
operating partner group that model i think is you know one of the reasons that
00:11:02.695 --> 00:11:07.195
private equity is has grown from you know straight to strength in the last few
00:11:07.195 --> 00:11:12.355
decades and especially the operating partner role and group you know has grown
00:11:12.355 --> 00:11:15.795
as well i mean we were reminiscing before we hit record about, you know,
00:11:15.935 --> 00:11:19.495
conferences like private equity, international PEI, right?
00:11:20.035 --> 00:11:23.075
I don't know how many other, how many years ago it was when you first attended
00:11:23.075 --> 00:11:28.175
that operating partner conference, but, you know, significantly smaller than it, than it is now.
00:11:28.335 --> 00:11:31.515
And that's, I don't just, not just a reflection of how well those guys have
00:11:31.515 --> 00:11:36.175
done building up a great conference, but also just a reflection of the growth in the industry, right?
00:11:36.315 --> 00:11:41.095
I think the industry officially probably started in 2001 with the creation of Capstoke.
00:11:41.612 --> 00:11:45.592
Which is KKR's group. Prior to that, there were other, there were operating
00:11:45.592 --> 00:11:47.612
partners. Bain and Company had them.
00:11:47.872 --> 00:11:52.672
Carlisle had them, but formally established. And I say that we went through
00:11:52.672 --> 00:11:57.372
this progression over the next 20 years in which early on in those 2000s,
00:11:57.452 --> 00:12:01.372
there was more players in the NBA than there were operating partners.
00:12:01.492 --> 00:12:05.652
Sort of take 12 players and multiply by 32 and you get the number there.
00:12:05.772 --> 00:12:08.872
And then you progress towards the end of the decade, but you still had more
00:12:08.872 --> 00:12:11.472
players in Major League Baseball.
00:12:11.612 --> 00:12:16.112
You sort of take 30 there, 30 cities multiplied by 26, but there were still
00:12:16.112 --> 00:12:18.832
more players in major league baseball than there were operating partners.
00:12:18.992 --> 00:12:21.432
And you probably progressed to around, you know, nobody knows exactly,
00:12:21.592 --> 00:12:26.512
but 2015, where at that point you crossed, and it's really incredible.
00:12:26.712 --> 00:12:30.812
The number of players in the NFL and operating partners were somewhat in the
00:12:30.812 --> 00:12:34.992
same ballpark as, you know, 15, 50 times 30, about 1500.
00:12:35.212 --> 00:12:38.532
Now we've exploded to thousands and thousands of operating partners,
00:12:38.532 --> 00:12:44.732
but the industry as it's formerly been established is still 25 years old,
00:12:44.932 --> 00:12:47.712
but didn't really explode until the last five to 10 years.
00:12:48.092 --> 00:12:53.012
And so it's really interesting when people think about it as this established
00:12:53.012 --> 00:12:57.152
entity that exists forever, but it's incredibly young. It's marginally older than Facebook.
00:12:57.592 --> 00:13:01.272
So, or meta as we want to call it. So it's, it's not that old.
00:13:01.472 --> 00:13:04.332
Yeah. I worked with, I don't know if I think of the names, but you know,
00:13:04.452 --> 00:13:07.132
Todd Cooper, Adam Fless back at Capstone.
00:13:07.332 --> 00:13:11.452
I don't want to say 20 years ago, probably 18 years ago,
00:13:11.612 --> 00:13:17.772
but that was really my first foray back when I was 80 into the operating partner
00:13:17.772 --> 00:13:22.352
world and what that group meant within a private equity organization.
00:13:22.832 --> 00:13:27.992
These guys really cared. They were really there to partner with the firm.
00:13:29.072 --> 00:13:33.292
Everything they were doing was focused on results and being effective they cared
00:13:33.292 --> 00:13:39.772
about you know just extremely authentic and and a very fast paced moving but
00:13:39.772 --> 00:13:41.692
you know but respectful um
00:13:42.081 --> 00:13:45.341
mindset was just yeah it really really changed
00:13:45.341 --> 00:13:48.121
my my view you know all those years ago and both
00:13:48.121 --> 00:13:51.601
great guys as well let's let's step
00:13:51.601 --> 00:13:54.301
back a little bit just just to you because i think
00:13:54.301 --> 00:13:57.301
you know beyond the role and the industry that you work in i think you know
00:13:57.301 --> 00:14:02.641
your background is is is impressive and fascinating enough as well let's talk
00:14:02.641 --> 00:14:06.701
about the being multilingual as an example i mean i know that you've traveled
00:14:06.701 --> 00:14:10.861
all over the world but how's that helped you i mean is that Were you naturally
00:14:10.861 --> 00:14:12.921
fluent in Spanish or Portuguese,
00:14:12.921 --> 00:14:15.421
or is that something that you've kind of picked over the last few years?
00:14:15.581 --> 00:14:17.881
And have you used that to your advantage?
00:14:18.201 --> 00:14:21.381
I mean, it's... I don't know if anybody's naturally fluent unless you're born
00:14:21.381 --> 00:14:23.181
or raised in an environment, and I was not.
00:14:24.361 --> 00:14:28.581
I was... I'm an English speaker. I think the only thing I had was...
00:14:28.581 --> 00:14:29.781
My parents were Jamaican.
00:14:30.541 --> 00:14:33.601
At least we came from the same, I guess, kingdom, you and I,
00:14:33.661 --> 00:14:35.721
at one point in time, for lack of a better word.
00:14:35.801 --> 00:14:43.421
But my parents were Jamaican. And I took an interest in Spanish probably when I was at General Mills.
00:14:43.781 --> 00:14:47.581
It led me to pursuing a role in Mexico. Pursued the role.
00:14:48.041 --> 00:14:52.421
Wound up in Mexico turning around plants. It's where I happened to also meet my wife.
00:14:54.501 --> 00:15:00.441
I immersed myself culturally. And I think the same thing when I went to Brazil.
00:15:00.661 --> 00:15:06.061
I spent some time at the Lotter Institute at Wharton, the AMBA program there.
00:15:06.061 --> 00:15:07.981
And that's where I learned Portuguese.
00:15:08.281 --> 00:15:14.621
But I think, you know, when you, you learn a language, you have a choice and
00:15:14.621 --> 00:15:17.701
you're either going to learn the language devoid of the culture.
00:15:18.873 --> 00:15:22.513
You're going to learn the language and understand the culture,
00:15:22.513 --> 00:15:27.333
or you can learn a language and you can become part of the culture.
00:15:27.693 --> 00:15:32.773
And I think the times that I spent in definitely in Mexico for a time,
00:15:32.913 --> 00:15:35.653
and I became part of the culture.
00:15:35.833 --> 00:15:38.333
I immersed myself in ways that I probably didn't anticipate.
00:15:38.693 --> 00:15:41.013
I think when I went to Brazil, I
00:15:41.013 --> 00:15:43.833
understood the culture. It was a shorter period of time that I was there.
00:15:44.293 --> 00:15:50.613
But both of those experiences made me far more empathetic when I came back to
00:15:50.613 --> 00:15:51.533
work in the United States.
00:15:51.653 --> 00:15:55.473
And it made me a more effective leader because I started to understand that
00:15:55.473 --> 00:15:57.293
my point of view wasn't the only point of view.
00:15:57.533 --> 00:16:06.473
And not only point of view, my paradigm, the context in which I saw things wasn't the same.
00:16:06.713 --> 00:16:12.233
And when you start to think about the context that others live in and the context,
00:16:12.433 --> 00:16:13.693
even within your own country,
00:16:13.953 --> 00:16:18.653
even within your own quote unquote home, it allows you to see problems in different
00:16:18.653 --> 00:16:26.333
ways to lead people, I think more effectively, but also to develop organizations more effectively.
00:16:26.473 --> 00:16:29.913
And I think it's been critical for me, that experience in Mexico,
00:16:30.213 --> 00:16:34.813
in Brazil, and then subsequently, you know, running teams across Asia and Europe
00:16:34.813 --> 00:16:38.073
as, as made me a stronger, much better leader.
00:16:38.073 --> 00:16:42.153
So it goes far beyond the question of language and extends into the question of culture.
00:16:42.333 --> 00:16:49.653
I hope, right, with, you know, the speed at which translation tools are evolving and getting better and,
00:16:49.893 --> 00:16:52.853
you know, to use your meta reference, there'll probably be, you know,
00:16:52.953 --> 00:16:57.493
translation embedded into the Ray-Ban meta glasses to the point in which you'll
00:16:57.493 --> 00:16:59.833
just be able to, I mean, I even think that testing,
00:17:00.053 --> 00:17:04.093
beta testing, some of this now, you can hear another person talking in a different
00:17:04.093 --> 00:17:05.713
language and it will provide a transcript,
00:17:05.973 --> 00:17:08.453
you know, on the lens and the screen. that allows you to see that.
00:17:08.853 --> 00:17:10.873
The danger of that, even though it does...
00:17:11.779 --> 00:17:14.719
Kind of streamline communications and allows people to you
00:17:14.719 --> 00:17:17.599
know to communicate more effectively quickly maybe you lose
00:17:17.599 --> 00:17:20.799
a bit of that magic right of actually forcing yourself to be
00:17:20.799 --> 00:17:23.559
you know embedded you know and kind of
00:17:23.559 --> 00:17:26.679
learn from scratch and maybe even learn the meaning behind
00:17:26.679 --> 00:17:29.559
some of the words and and the pronunciation that allow
00:17:29.559 --> 00:17:32.339
you to see to see their culture from from their
00:17:32.339 --> 00:17:36.799
side and maybe hold back from not feeling you need to integrate and and actually
00:17:36.799 --> 00:17:40.579
travel to that location i mean do you think that there's a there's a danger
00:17:40.579 --> 00:17:46.219
that people or lose that edge that you picked up from learning the language
00:17:46.219 --> 00:17:50.319
from scratch and without growing up in the native town?
00:17:51.099 --> 00:17:56.139
Look, I think it'll always be a choice. I think it'll depend on what you're
00:17:56.139 --> 00:17:58.199
trying to do. I think there's going to be definitely a place.
00:17:58.359 --> 00:18:03.579
I think people who are going to be able to fly out of country and sit and engage
00:18:03.579 --> 00:18:09.079
in a dialogue with a group of native speakers when they may be the only native
00:18:09.079 --> 00:18:11.179
speaker, I think that's going to be incredible.
00:18:11.932 --> 00:18:16.552
I still think there are people that will make the choice to immerse themselves
00:18:16.552 --> 00:18:22.992
culturally elsewhere and understand the nuance of a culture far beyond the language.
00:18:23.412 --> 00:18:28.312
And I think that, I don't think that can ever be lost unless we become monolithic
00:18:28.312 --> 00:18:32.712
culturally worldwide, which pretty tough for that to happen.
00:18:32.712 --> 00:18:36.312
I think you'll always be able to make that choice in terms of how much do you want to grow as a person.
00:18:36.732 --> 00:18:40.872
And I don't see that ever ending. I read something, I'm not going to be able
00:18:40.872 --> 00:18:46.932
to quote the exact statistics, but there is thousands of languages that are still practiced today.
00:18:47.672 --> 00:18:53.372
And it's like 90% of them are spoken by like less than, I don't know, 200 people.
00:18:53.612 --> 00:18:57.332
So that to me is just mind boggling, right? Just outside the main languages
00:18:57.332 --> 00:18:59.712
that everyone operates in today.
00:18:59.712 --> 00:19:05.632
But to your point that, you know, there are still similarities across culture
00:19:05.632 --> 00:19:10.112
and it's tapping into those respectfully and with, you know,
00:19:10.212 --> 00:19:15.832
with empathy that allows you to see things from their point of view and,
00:19:15.972 --> 00:19:20.052
you know, and hopefully be more effective in operations, which I think is cool.
00:19:20.052 --> 00:19:26.552
So, I mean, you've lived in a lot of places around the world and I'm sure traveled as well with work.
00:19:27.692 --> 00:19:30.692
Is there a certain part of the world that you might...
00:19:31.071 --> 00:19:34.151
Retire to or is there a place that you you're really fond of
00:19:34.151 --> 00:19:37.051
that you go back to on a regular basis well i mean like most people
00:19:37.051 --> 00:19:39.831
think i already live in atlanta i'll probably retire to
00:19:39.831 --> 00:19:42.651
atlanta but okay i'm most fond of rio
00:19:42.651 --> 00:19:45.631
de janeiro okay the experience in
00:19:45.631 --> 00:19:48.451
rio it was fun most people might
00:19:48.451 --> 00:19:53.171
think i know why i lived rio but it really was i think a place that challenged
00:19:53.171 --> 00:19:58.851
me culturally challenged me artistically it challenged me on every single dimension
00:19:58.851 --> 00:20:04.211
you could possibly imagine and really diving into Rio and all that it was.
00:20:04.211 --> 00:20:06.291
It's a place that's so rich in history.
00:20:06.751 --> 00:20:10.251
Many people think of it as Carnaval or think of it as beaches.
00:20:10.651 --> 00:20:14.511
And it's so rich in terms of history, in terms of, you know,
00:20:14.751 --> 00:20:16.851
everything you could possibly imagine.
00:20:16.991 --> 00:20:22.371
I was fortunate enough to spend a semester there studying philosophy and supply
00:20:22.371 --> 00:20:24.391
chain, if you can think both of those at the same time.
00:20:24.531 --> 00:20:27.951
And I think I will never forget that experience. And in addition to doing a
00:20:27.951 --> 00:20:31.511
couple of deals there around the document storage business early in my career.
00:20:31.631 --> 00:20:35.071
So, and then working on an airline there. So I've been to Brazil so many times,
00:20:35.111 --> 00:20:38.511
but I've actually had a chance to live, work and study in Rio,
00:20:38.711 --> 00:20:41.231
which is other than the United States, the place I've done all three.
00:20:41.791 --> 00:20:48.371
No, that's fascinating. So are you at some point going to do guest lecturing?
00:20:48.551 --> 00:20:52.131
Is that something that professors will reach out to you on? I mean,
00:20:52.251 --> 00:20:55.491
I think you'd be fantastic at it, but is it, you know, is that,
00:20:55.571 --> 00:20:58.651
is that a desire at some point or? It's something I already do.
00:20:58.951 --> 00:21:02.691
So I'll be at Wharton next week. That's next week.
00:21:03.471 --> 00:21:09.171
I do some small sessions at Harvard once a year. I do probably three or four
00:21:09.171 --> 00:21:11.271
sessions at Wharton every year.
00:21:11.431 --> 00:21:13.771
And, you know, we'll see how that goes over the course of time.
00:21:13.851 --> 00:21:15.071
We never know where life takes us.
00:21:15.191 --> 00:21:20.111
I do enjoy it. And I think I enjoy being attached to individuals or having the
00:21:20.111 --> 00:21:23.311
opportunity to be in front of individuals who are hungry to see a different perspective.
00:21:23.531 --> 00:21:29.371
And so that time at Wharton has been increasingly fun each year that I do it.
00:21:29.431 --> 00:21:31.691
And we'll see what that ends up happening over the long haul.
00:21:32.413 --> 00:21:36.653
Which professor's sessions are you generally guest lecturer in?
00:21:36.753 --> 00:21:41.073
Have you bounced around, or is there one? I have bounced around most recently
00:21:41.073 --> 00:21:44.873
Professor Burku with private equity.
00:21:45.473 --> 00:21:47.193
Yeah, of course. That makes sense.
00:21:48.093 --> 00:21:53.233
Students are very lucky to be able to get you to... Listen, here you speak in
00:21:53.233 --> 00:21:56.813
real time, be able to answer questions off you.
00:21:57.193 --> 00:22:00.673
I know a ton of them, at least on the East Coast,
00:22:00.673 --> 00:22:03.453
getting into private equity or at least they have that as
00:22:03.453 --> 00:22:06.733
a target career path and you know there's a lot of anxiety around
00:22:06.733 --> 00:22:09.813
how that might evolve and you know the opportunities etc
00:22:09.813 --> 00:22:12.693
and so i can i can imagine it's
00:22:12.693 --> 00:22:16.193
a well-attended class for sure and then
00:22:16.193 --> 00:22:19.393
on the on the private equity side are you any
00:22:19.393 --> 00:22:22.753
predictions for the industry in the next 10 to
00:22:22.753 --> 00:22:25.973
20 20 years i mean a lot more of the same just
00:22:25.973 --> 00:22:28.673
continued growth or you know do you
00:22:28.673 --> 00:22:32.053
see any kind of fundamental transformative changes
00:22:32.053 --> 00:22:37.373
happening in the in the near term 20 years a long time so i'm not i'm not sure
00:22:37.373 --> 00:22:40.293
i'd have been effective if i'm predictive at predicting what's going to happen
00:22:40.293 --> 00:22:43.293
20 years from now then there's a lot of things i would probably be doing right
00:22:43.293 --> 00:22:48.533
now look i think that private equity you can read any report you want to read
00:22:48.533 --> 00:22:50.393
there's there's plenty of capital in the world.
00:22:51.309 --> 00:22:58.349
And there are fewer deals, and the ability to create positive outcomes or attractive
00:22:58.349 --> 00:23:00.309
outcomes on the deals is becoming increasingly hard.
00:23:00.569 --> 00:23:05.129
So I think almost anybody you ask, and I think that's been one of the things
00:23:05.129 --> 00:23:08.089
we focused on heavily at Apollo over the last six or seven years,
00:23:08.589 --> 00:23:13.989
is that the ability to drive value from operations will become more and more important.
00:23:14.309 --> 00:23:19.949
And those that can do it systematically, programmatically, configure solutions
00:23:19.949 --> 00:23:24.509
for companies efficiently effective, which I think we're doing at Apollo and
00:23:24.509 --> 00:23:28.729
we're becoming more effective every day at it. I think those companies will win.
00:23:29.069 --> 00:23:31.609
Operating partners are going to have to become technology enabled.
00:23:32.429 --> 00:23:37.469
And that has been something technology, I think for a long time in the operating
00:23:37.469 --> 00:23:40.209
partner world has been something that's been done on the side.
00:23:40.349 --> 00:23:43.169
And I think you're going to see it integrated in the model.
00:23:43.289 --> 00:23:48.689
I think we've done that effectively At Apollo, we don't even just have one technology group.
00:23:48.829 --> 00:23:53.009
We've split our groups into technology, infrastructure. We have data,
00:23:53.529 --> 00:23:55.129
digital, product, and AI.
00:23:55.369 --> 00:24:01.529
So we're covering the full gambit with expertise across the board and integrating
00:24:01.529 --> 00:24:06.809
that effectively into other aspects and other functions.
00:24:06.809 --> 00:24:12.229
So whether it's our ESG function, integrating data, whether it's our sourcing
00:24:12.229 --> 00:24:17.589
function today, I think we, we use AI within our sourcing function.
00:24:17.769 --> 00:24:23.469
We have a $60 billion spend cube that we manage using AI to read contracts in
00:24:23.469 --> 00:24:27.669
order to identify leakage that occurs across our value chain.
00:24:27.849 --> 00:24:32.369
Those are, those are very unique things that I think that we are doing that are exceptional.
00:24:33.089 --> 00:24:36.689
I think that is going to become much more of the norm.
00:24:37.089 --> 00:24:40.589
And in the absence of that, I think firms that aren't doing that will suffer.
00:24:40.809 --> 00:24:41.689
That's super interesting.
00:24:41.949 --> 00:24:46.509
It really is. Fascinating to get your perspective again. I think the reflect
00:24:46.509 --> 00:24:50.949
on the past 20 years and how much the industry has changed and also the operating,
00:24:50.949 --> 00:24:56.589
you know, kind of partner structure the next 20 years, who knows where it's going to go for sure.
00:24:56.749 --> 00:24:59.889
But I think that's interesting that you're already adopting those technologies,
00:24:59.889 --> 00:25:04.169
you're driving them. While, you know, the size of AUM that you guys have and
00:25:04.169 --> 00:25:06.029
people, when people look at private equity firms, they're like,
00:25:06.089 --> 00:25:10.009
that's hundreds of millions and billions of dollars, but the port co's themselves
00:25:10.009 --> 00:25:11.629
aren't necessarily that large, right?
00:25:11.689 --> 00:25:15.069
There's several hundreds of millions, sometimes on the low billion side.
00:25:15.269 --> 00:25:20.029
So, you know, they do need advice on the latest technology. They don't necessarily
00:25:20.029 --> 00:25:25.529
have the large tech teams that some, you know, public companies and fortune 100 funds will.
00:25:25.789 --> 00:25:29.129
So them being able to lean on a center of excellence, you know,
00:25:29.209 --> 00:25:32.229
especially around a discipline that's evolving so
00:25:32.229 --> 00:25:35.089
quickly and you know do they spend money on it do they not
00:25:35.089 --> 00:25:38.269
how can it be used effectively i think is is critical
00:25:38.269 --> 00:25:41.129
to the to the industry are other groups doing
00:25:41.129 --> 00:25:44.049
that are you hearing you know the same from from the
00:25:44.049 --> 00:25:48.789
other cohorts that go to pei or i think the conference the conference this past
00:25:48.789 --> 00:25:55.829
couple days is heavily focused on ai what i think is key though is you you and
00:25:55.829 --> 00:26:01.309
i could both choose to focus on technology the differentiation comes when I can develop.
00:26:02.301 --> 00:26:09.161
Patterns and clear playbooks for action that are flexible enough so that I can
00:26:09.161 --> 00:26:10.821
apply them across multiple situations.
00:26:11.721 --> 00:26:17.061
And I think, I can't speak to say that a firm is effective or less effective,
00:26:17.061 --> 00:26:21.821
but as an industry, the industry has historically focused on just doing projects,
00:26:22.001 --> 00:26:24.501
doing projects within an individual portfolio company.
00:26:24.661 --> 00:26:30.341
When you get to the point that you can execute repeatedly across a series of
00:26:30.341 --> 00:26:36.561
companies and with fewer people using third parties that can sort of rinse and repeat,
00:26:36.761 --> 00:26:40.961
that's the point in which you can really drive accelerated value creation.
00:26:40.981 --> 00:26:44.601
I think we are starting to do that across with respect to AI.
00:26:44.981 --> 00:26:48.961
We've done that already with respect to when we do a carve out,
00:26:49.161 --> 00:26:55.341
I'm not going to say it's flawless, no carve out flawless, But the repeatability across our carve-outs,
00:26:55.581 --> 00:27:00.121
the repeatability in which we deploy data platforms, the repeatability in which
00:27:00.121 --> 00:27:05.021
we're now executing, whether it be pricing or whether it be a series of other initiatives,
00:27:05.281 --> 00:27:08.021
it's accelerating almost exponentially.
00:27:08.521 --> 00:27:12.881
So I think there are many other firms that are trying to follow and do that.
00:27:12.881 --> 00:27:17.481
There's a few that are doing that effectively, but I think it's one of those
00:27:17.481 --> 00:27:21.481
things that there will be leaders and there'll be followers and there'll probably
00:27:21.481 --> 00:27:23.721
be four or five or six firms that really lead.
00:27:24.081 --> 00:27:27.481
And the other will see that example over the course of time and follow.
00:27:28.273 --> 00:27:32.233
I think we're leading. Pretty sure we're leading. I like it.
00:27:32.313 --> 00:27:36.793
That's a good call for action in some competition out there.
00:27:37.053 --> 00:27:40.953
Before we wrap up, Aaron, I wanted to ask you kind of a broader question as
00:27:40.953 --> 00:27:47.073
well around just generally leadership and some of your lessons from your experience
00:27:47.073 --> 00:27:48.733
and maybe some of the blood,
00:27:48.893 --> 00:27:52.733
sweat, and tears in what's effective and what's not.
00:27:52.973 --> 00:27:56.213
Love to hear of you. I think it's one of those things.
00:27:56.333 --> 00:28:00.453
I think this is probably along with talent, but I think, you know,
00:28:00.713 --> 00:28:04.693
talent is leadership's a function of who you put into the chair is one of the
00:28:04.693 --> 00:28:06.673
most important things, not just for private equity.
00:28:06.813 --> 00:28:10.753
It's just, it's, it's across the board. And there's a phrase that has started
00:28:10.753 --> 00:28:14.973
to come to my mind often, which is there's a lot of people that love to be leaders,
00:28:15.113 --> 00:28:16.833
but there's very few people that love leadership.
00:28:17.587 --> 00:28:25.367
And that is, I think that is a something, forget as a country in the US and
00:28:25.367 --> 00:28:29.867
probably globally need to worry about, but it's, I think it's increasingly important.
00:28:30.487 --> 00:28:35.427
I definitely look for it when I hired my teams, whether my teams are private equity or otherwise.
00:28:36.007 --> 00:28:39.487
We look for it, starting to look for it more and more when we hire in the portfolio.
00:28:39.927 --> 00:28:45.107
But the idea of individuals who have a set of firm principles to guide their
00:28:45.107 --> 00:28:51.287
leadership and their thinking, because what you often get when you have a leader
00:28:51.287 --> 00:28:54.827
that does enough leadership is you get a manager, you get a facilitator.
00:28:55.547 --> 00:28:59.767
And regardless of whether they've been a CEO before, regardless of whether they've
00:28:59.767 --> 00:29:02.887
been they've been on top of a large organization.
00:29:03.387 --> 00:29:06.527
When an organization really needs to inflect,
00:29:06.787 --> 00:29:13.307
truly inflect, there has to be someone there who is willing to remove the friction
00:29:13.307 --> 00:29:17.987
that's associated with that organization inflecting and provide the energy that's
00:29:17.987 --> 00:29:19.887
necessary for the organization to do so.
00:29:20.207 --> 00:29:24.407
And I think more and more, not more and more, I think people are starting to
00:29:24.407 --> 00:29:28.887
recognize that definitely in private equity and identify people who are leaders
00:29:28.887 --> 00:29:33.087
who love leadership more than just managers who sit on top of organizations.
00:29:33.527 --> 00:29:37.907
And so I think it's something that I have found interesting over the years,
00:29:37.927 --> 00:29:41.747
and I've probably become more, less compromising over the course of time in
00:29:41.747 --> 00:29:42.767
finding those individuals.
00:29:43.267 --> 00:29:50.067
Interesting. So it's not just a mindset, but also a capability to flip, right?
00:29:50.167 --> 00:29:56.307
Be agile, be a wartime, as well as a peacetime CEO, depending on the environment
00:29:56.307 --> 00:29:58.467
in which you're having to operate. Is that? Yeah.
00:29:58.767 --> 00:30:02.327
And I think it's, it's step into the breach for lack of a better word.
00:30:02.467 --> 00:30:06.767
The phrase I use, I've used recently for those that love American football is
00:30:06.767 --> 00:30:08.447
stay in the pocket. Right.
00:30:09.107 --> 00:30:12.267
There's, you know, when you, when we think about, and I'm not a lover of the
00:30:12.267 --> 00:30:17.107
Patriots, but someone like Tom Brady, it's, it's, can you stay in the pocket and deliver the strike?
00:30:17.966 --> 00:30:21.806
And regardless of the circumstances around you and regardless of what's going
00:30:21.806 --> 00:30:24.546
to happen, I think those that, it's a common, it's common. I mean,
00:30:24.646 --> 00:30:26.266
I tend to hire a lot of people from West Point.
00:30:26.526 --> 00:30:29.786
I tend to hire a lot of people who've been from academies of leadership.
00:30:29.786 --> 00:30:34.226
And the reason for is they have a deep understanding of that and what it really means.
00:30:34.606 --> 00:30:38.226
And I think the more you can build your organization with leaders throughout,
00:30:38.506 --> 00:30:42.166
not just at the top, the stronger your organization is over the course of time.
00:30:42.706 --> 00:30:45.906
Yeah, no, I love it. That's extremely telling. And I think there's,
00:30:45.986 --> 00:30:53.146
you know, there's a limited number of people that have that broad insight, right?
00:30:53.346 --> 00:30:58.626
Because you're not just hiring, you're also operating with, you've been making
00:30:58.626 --> 00:31:02.286
changes, you know, across multiple organizations, right?
00:31:02.546 --> 00:31:08.246
At any time in any given year and seen it over, over, over a couple of decades.
00:31:08.246 --> 00:31:12.346
So that, that view is, you know, I think is, is worth its weight in gold.
00:31:12.486 --> 00:31:15.766
It's extremely important so yeah i appreciate you sharing that thank you uh
00:31:15.766 --> 00:31:18.526
it's fantastic to to chat with you erin i
00:31:18.526 --> 00:31:21.286
really appreciate your time and you know i know
00:31:21.286 --> 00:31:24.446
for anyone who's in pe themselves maybe
00:31:24.446 --> 00:31:29.146
a smaller firm or you know is an operating partner or even even a deal partner
00:31:29.146 --> 00:31:33.666
i think on the finance side will uh hopefully find the conversation interesting
00:31:33.666 --> 00:31:37.586
and uh you know if you post any images or there's any video from some of your
00:31:37.586 --> 00:31:40.366
guest lectures i know people would be interested in seeing that,
00:31:40.386 --> 00:31:41.926
um, out on, uh, on LinkedIn.
00:31:42.186 --> 00:31:44.466
So just want to say thank you again for your time on Friday.
00:31:44.806 --> 00:31:48.986
Um, yeah, it was great to see you. So appreciate it. Appreciate it. Thank you very much.