درباره این اپیزود
What does FDA Breakthrough Device designation mean for an in vitro diagnostic (IVD)? Learn what it takes to qualify, what evidence supports a request, and how designation can shape development and clinical study planning.
In this episode of Expert Insights, Dan Simpson, RAC, Director of Regulatory Affairs at DCN Dx, joins host Emily Friedland, Vice President of Clinical Research, to discuss the practical benefits and limitations of FDA’s Breakthrough Devices Program.
They cover:
-How clinical utility, unmet needs, and access to care inform a Breakthrough request.
-What evidence to include, and why more data isn’t always more useful.
-Priority review, FDA sprint discussions, and clinical protocol agreements.
-How 510(k) and De Novo pathways affect intended use and development decisions.
-FDA’s READI-Home Innovation Challenge and the potential role of home-use diagnostics in reducing hospital readmissions.
-When to seek regulatory input before committing to a clinical study.
The conversation examines how earlier FDA engagement can help developers clarify evidence expectations while working toward marketing authorization.
To discuss whether your diagnostic may meet the Breakthrough criteria, contact DCN Dx.
Subscribe to Expert Insights for conversations about diagnostic development, clinical research, and regulatory strategy.
#IVD #RegulatoryAffairs #Diagnostics
In this episode of Expert Insights, Dan Simpson, RAC, Director of Regulatory Affairs at DCN Dx, joins host Emily Friedland, Vice President of Clinical Research, to discuss the practical benefits and limitations of FDA’s Breakthrough Devices Program.
They cover:
-How clinical utility, unmet needs, and access to care inform a Breakthrough request.
-What evidence to include, and why more data isn’t always more useful.
-Priority review, FDA sprint discussions, and clinical protocol agreements.
-How 510(k) and De Novo pathways affect intended use and development decisions.
-FDA’s READI-Home Innovation Challenge and the potential role of home-use diagnostics in reducing hospital readmissions.
-When to seek regulatory input before committing to a clinical study.
The conversation examines how earlier FDA engagement can help developers clarify evidence expectations while working toward marketing authorization.
To discuss whether your diagnostic may meet the Breakthrough criteria, contact DCN Dx.
Subscribe to Expert Insights for conversations about diagnostic development, clinical research, and regulatory strategy.
#IVD #RegulatoryAffairs #Diagnostics
انگلیسی
ایالات متحده آمریکا
رونوشت 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
جستجوی اپیزودهای گذشته
اپیزودهای قبلی DCN Dx Expert Insights را جستجو کن.
قسمت های دیگر در این پادکست
A DCN Dx Expert Insights conversation with Charlie Mamrak, CEO at DCN Dx, hosted by Mitzi Rettinger.
Most IVD programs don’t lose months because a single experiment failed. They lose months at the seams: development to clinical, clinical to regulatory, scale-up to routine manufacturing, and specim…
In this episode, Emily Friedland, VP of Clinical Research at DCN Dx, talks with two guests who come at QMSR from different directions: the regulatory strategy side and the quality systems implementation side.
Dan Simpson, RAC, Director of Regulatory Affairs at DCN Dx, covers the regulatory framing…
In this episode of Expert Insights, DCN Dx’s Mitzi Rettinger speaks with Dr. Pat Vaughan, DCN Dx’s Chief Operating Officer, about what point-of-care really meant in 2025, how development expectations have shifted, and his predictions for what 2026 will bring.
Drawing from Pat’s recent article and …
As rapid diagnostic programs transition from R&D to scaled production, small sources of variation can quickly become major risks. In this episode of Expert Insights, Mitzi Rettinger, Chief Revenue Officer at DCN Dx, sits down with Daniel Levenson, Business Development Manager at KinBio, to disc…
Specimen strategy is one of the most common sources of avoidable delay in IVD development. Teams that defer specimen decisions until after the evidence plan is set tend to discover the mismatch at the worst possible time: during analytical validation, clinical performance work, or submission prep.
…
سلب مسئولیت: پادکست و آثار هنری تعبیه شده در این صفحه متعلق به DCN Dx است که متعلق به صاحب آن است و به Listen Notes، Inc وابسته یا تایید نشده است.
ویرایش
از کمک شما برای بروز نگهداشتن پایگاهدادههای پادکست سپاسگزاریم