درباره این اپیزود
This week we chat with Isabella (Izzy) Muerte about modules, build systems and more. We talk about xyr new job (which, at the time of recording, was with Netlify), and how that still involves working on build systems - but particularly CMake, where xe has found an intriguing special use for emoji!
We segue into a discussion about modules, which Izzy was definitely down on a couple of years ago, and what xe thinks of them now. To avoid spoilers don’t read the title!
Links:
- Izzy's (2017) rant on Modules
- 'tag_invoke' - An Actually Good Way to Do Customization Points- Gašper Ažman's talk at C++ London
- byteswap- P1272 - Byteswapping for fun&&nuf
- retain_ptr- P0468 - An Intrusive Smart Pointer
- Lambda Expressions on cppreference- constexpr: explicitly specifies that the function call operator is a constexpr function. When this specifier is not present, the function call operator will be constexpr anyway, if it happens to satisfy all constexpr function requirements (since C++17)
انگلیسی
ایالات متحده آمریکا
رونوشت 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
جستجوی اپیزودهای گذشته
اپیزودهای قبلی cpp.chat را جستجو کن.
قسمت های دیگر در این پادکست
This week we chat with a panel of C++ trainers from around the world (but mostly from Germany, for some reason) - Nicolai Josuttis, Jason Turner, Rainer Grimm, Klaus Iglberger and Mateusz Pusz.
We talk about how bringing in a good trainer will keep your costs down, whether online training works or…
This week we chat with Tony Van Eerd about what comes after Post Modern C++,
what the single most important principle for good code is, and what Dr. Seuss and Shakespeare have to do with all this.
The off-by-one jokes are regular, or at least semi-regular, but what proposals has Tony killed?
And h…
This week we chat with a Yuri Minaev, of PVS Studio, about static analysis - and why you shouldn't be skipping on this essential part of software development.
Why is using a static analysis tool better than peer review (the clue is in the title)? Should you do both?
What is the most common bug? An…
This week we chat with a Conor Hoekstra, about dreaming in algorithms, being a programming language addict and writing beautiful code.
We look at what Conor is jealous of in other languages, why his competitive coding entry came dead last, and why he really likes sugar and dopamine. And is it real…
This week we chat with a vector-of-bool (a.k.a. Colby Pike).
We talk about pseudonyms, modules, build systems and his standard layout proposal, Pitchfork.
At the last minute we branch into TDD and what makes good design.
But what prompts Michael Caisse, in the chat, to respond, "because we are n…
سلب مسئولیت: پادکست و آثار هنری تعبیه شده در این صفحه متعلق به Jon Kalb & Phil Nash است که متعلق به صاحب آن است و به Listen Notes، Inc وابسته یا تایید نشده است.
ویرایش
از کمک شما برای بروز نگهداشتن پایگاهدادههای پادکست سپاسگزاریم
