Chief in Tech S1E56: Viktoriya Tsytsak, Kehinde Ndede, Swati Sharma & Burçak Akbıyık : From Execution to Strategy – How Women Break the “Trusted Doer” Trap

WEBVTT
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.160
We have a really fascinating stack of notes today
00:00:03.160 --> 00:00:06.200
focused on a very specific and honestly incredibly
00:00:06.200 --> 00:00:09.480
frustrating professional paradox. Yeah, it's
00:00:09.480 --> 00:00:11.519
a great topic. Right. So our mission for this
00:00:11.519 --> 00:00:14.400
deep dive is to unpack a recent panel discussion.
00:00:14.599 --> 00:00:18.160
It's titled Breaking the Trusted Doer Trap. How
00:00:18.160 --> 00:00:21.199
women in tech can transform into strategic leaders.
00:00:21.379 --> 00:00:24.820
And this material, I mean. It explores a reality
00:00:24.820 --> 00:00:26.960
that might hit a little too close to home for
00:00:26.960 --> 00:00:29.079
you, the listener. Oh, absolutely. It looks at
00:00:29.079 --> 00:00:31.480
why being exceptionally, undeniably good at your
00:00:31.480 --> 00:00:33.939
job can sometimes be the exact thing that halts
00:00:33.939 --> 00:00:36.640
your career in its tracks. Which sounds completely
00:00:36.640 --> 00:00:39.140
backwards. It really does. But the sources reveal
00:00:39.140 --> 00:00:41.219
that for many high -performing women in tech,
00:00:41.340 --> 00:00:44.359
and honestly, high -performers in literally any
00:00:44.359 --> 00:00:47.299
industry exceptional work, often just leads to
00:00:47.299 --> 00:00:50.420
a mountain of more work. Yeah, rather than recognition
00:00:50.420 --> 00:00:53.009
as a strategic decision maker. Exactly. your
00:00:53.009 --> 00:00:56.049
own reliability inadvertently becomes this concrete
00:00:56.049 --> 00:00:59.030
ceiling. It is a really profound structural trap.
00:00:59.270 --> 00:01:01.950
And to grasp the mechanics of why this happens,
00:01:02.070 --> 00:01:04.109
you have to look at how organizations optimize
00:01:04.109 --> 00:01:07.370
for immediate survival. Because companies, well,
00:01:08.189 --> 00:01:10.069
they operate on the path of these resistance.
00:01:10.209 --> 00:01:13.489
Makes sense. So imagine a leadership team staring
00:01:13.489 --> 00:01:17.989
down a critical high stakes deadline that needed
00:01:17.989 --> 00:01:20.670
to be met yesterday. The classic corporate fire
00:01:20.670 --> 00:01:24.629
drill. Exactly. They are not going to hand that
00:01:24.629 --> 00:01:27.390
project to an untested employee as a growth opportunity.
00:01:27.609 --> 00:01:29.950
They're going to lean heavily on their absolute
00:01:29.950 --> 00:01:33.170
best problem solvers for guaranteed execution.
00:01:33.609 --> 00:01:36.390
Because they just need it done. Right. It is
00:01:36.390 --> 00:01:39.090
rarely a malicious scheme by management. I mean
00:01:39.090 --> 00:01:41.329
it is just a brutal calculation of efficiency.
00:01:41.650 --> 00:01:43.549
Okay, let's unpack this because I want you to
00:01:43.549 --> 00:01:45.650
imagine you work at this company and every single
00:01:45.650 --> 00:01:47.890
time there's an office potluck you bring the
00:01:47.890 --> 00:01:50.930
most incredible show -stopping perfectly baked
00:01:50.930 --> 00:01:53.579
dessert. Oh, I like this. Yeah, so we are talking
00:01:53.579 --> 00:01:58.019
a three -tier chocolate raspberry cake made entirely
00:01:58.019 --> 00:02:00.540
from scratch. Everyone absolutely loves it. They
00:02:00.540 --> 00:02:02.859
praise you for it. And they rely on your cake
00:02:02.859 --> 00:02:05.120
to basically save the party. You're the dessert
00:02:05.120 --> 00:02:08.419
hero. Exactly. But pretty soon, you were exclusively
00:02:08.419 --> 00:02:11.319
known as the dessert person. So when it comes
00:02:11.319 --> 00:02:14.039
time to actually plan the overall menu for the
00:02:14.039 --> 00:02:17.099
next big company event, or organize the catering
00:02:17.099 --> 00:02:20.300
budget, or negotiate the venue contract, nobody
00:02:20.300 --> 00:02:23.219
even thinks to send you a calendar invite. Because
00:02:23.219 --> 00:02:25.699
you're just the baker. Right. They just assume
00:02:25.699 --> 00:02:28.180
you were too busy baking the cake. Or worse,
00:02:28.599 --> 00:02:31.539
their brains have fundamentally categorized you
00:02:31.539 --> 00:02:34.919
only as the baker, not the event planner. They
00:02:34.919 --> 00:02:37.780
highly value your output, but they have completely
00:02:37.780 --> 00:02:41.280
compartmentalized your capabilities. In the minds
00:02:41.280 --> 00:02:44.969
of your organization, you are the doer. not the
00:02:44.969 --> 00:02:47.169
decider. Which is such a tough spot to be in.
00:02:47.250 --> 00:02:49.250
It is. And that efficiency calculation we mentioned
00:02:49.250 --> 00:02:52.509
earlier, it inadvertently traps incredibly capable
00:02:52.509 --> 00:02:54.729
individuals in these operational roles. Yeah.
00:02:54.930 --> 00:02:57.030
The organization becomes so dependent on this
00:02:57.030 --> 00:02:58.870
person to keep the day -to -day engine running
00:02:58.870 --> 00:03:01.949
smoothly that leadership literally cannot imagine
00:03:01.949 --> 00:03:04.009
pulling them away to focus on high -level strategy.
00:03:04.210 --> 00:03:06.789
The business would stumble without them. Precisely.
00:03:06.990 --> 00:03:09.469
Without their constant flawless execution, things
00:03:09.469 --> 00:03:11.889
fall apart. Which means, if you are listening
00:03:11.889 --> 00:03:14.740
to this right now, This dynamic dictates your
00:03:14.740 --> 00:03:17.599
daily life. Whether you are actively prepping
00:03:17.599 --> 00:03:19.840
for a performance review, mapping out your next
00:03:19.840 --> 00:03:23.539
promotion, or you're just insanely curious about
00:03:23.539 --> 00:03:26.099
these hidden workplace dynamics. The dynamics
00:03:26.099 --> 00:03:28.599
that explain why some people skyrocket to the
00:03:28.599 --> 00:03:31.400
C -suite while brilliant performers stall out
00:03:31.400 --> 00:03:33.639
in middle management. Exactly. Understanding
00:03:33.639 --> 00:03:36.599
this paradox is your first line of defense, because
00:03:36.599 --> 00:03:38.419
you can't break out of a trap you don't even
00:03:38.419 --> 00:03:40.620
see. And while the panel specifically centered
00:03:40.620 --> 00:03:43.360
on women in tech. which is a demographic that
00:03:43.360 --> 00:03:46.960
historically faces compounded systemic biases
00:03:46.960 --> 00:03:50.099
and a really steep uphill battle for leadership
00:03:50.099 --> 00:03:54.120
visibility. This phenomenon is broad. Very broad.
00:03:54.219 --> 00:03:55.919
Yeah. Being punished with more execution for
00:03:55.919 --> 00:03:58.259
delivering great execution. It's a universal
00:03:58.259 --> 00:04:00.939
structural flaw. It resonates across almost every
00:04:00.939 --> 00:04:03.159
corporate environment. So taking this from a
00:04:03.159 --> 00:04:05.379
high level theory down to the lived reality on
00:04:05.379 --> 00:04:07.800
the office floor requires looking closely at
00:04:07.800 --> 00:04:10.180
the specific experiences shared by the industry
00:04:10.180 --> 00:04:12.300
leaders on this panel. It does, yeah. Because
00:04:12.300 --> 00:04:14.900
the friction between desperately wanting to shape
00:04:14.900 --> 00:04:18.339
the future of a company and actually just spending
00:04:18.339 --> 00:04:20.920
40 hours a week executing someone else's vision,
00:04:21.319 --> 00:04:25.019
I mean, it is palpable in these notes. The panelists
00:04:25.019 --> 00:04:28.600
brought some incredibly grounded, sometimes painful
00:04:28.600 --> 00:04:32.040
examples of that exact friction. Yeah. Let's
00:04:32.040 --> 00:04:34.170
talk about Keen and Duddy. She's a principal
00:04:34.170 --> 00:04:36.389
technical business analyst, and she had this
00:04:36.389 --> 00:04:39.649
massive realization that serves as a cornerstone
00:04:39.649 --> 00:04:41.649
in the source material. Right, her realization
00:04:41.649 --> 00:04:44.170
about reliability. Exactly. She realized that
00:04:44.170 --> 00:04:46.629
being reliable and operationally dependable did
00:04:46.629 --> 00:04:48.949
not equate to being seen as a leader. In fact,
00:04:48.949 --> 00:04:51.269
those are two completely divergent tracks in
00:04:51.269 --> 00:04:53.509
the minds of upper management. Kehane noted that
00:04:53.509 --> 00:04:56.629
she had to force a very conscious, deliberate
00:04:56.629 --> 00:04:59.870
psychological shift away from completing tasks
00:04:59.870 --> 00:05:03.040
and toward driving organizational outcomes. Which
00:05:03.040 --> 00:05:05.000
sounds like a neat piece of corporate jargon,
00:05:05.040 --> 00:05:06.839
but... Well, think about the psychology of a
00:05:06.839 --> 00:05:09.680
high performer. Right. When your entire professional
00:05:09.680 --> 00:05:11.860
identity, your sense of worth, and your daily,
00:05:11.980 --> 00:05:14.899
like... dopamine hits, had been built on being
00:05:14.899 --> 00:05:17.879
the person who flawlessly crosses items off a
00:05:17.879 --> 00:05:20.920
checklist. Making the mental pivot to just ignore
00:05:20.920 --> 00:05:23.860
the checklist is terrifying. You feel like you
00:05:23.860 --> 00:05:26.120
are suddenly failing at your job. Oh, I bet.
00:05:26.600 --> 00:05:29.439
And Victoria Zitzak, a senior director at Interiors
00:05:29.439 --> 00:05:32.019
who built entire practices from the ground up,
00:05:32.420 --> 00:05:34.279
she echoed this sentiment but took it a step
00:05:34.279 --> 00:05:37.139
further. What did she say? Victoria identified
00:05:37.139 --> 00:05:40.060
that exceptional execution alone doesn't buy
00:05:40.060 --> 00:05:43.240
you an ounce of strategic influence. Wow. Yeah.
00:05:43.759 --> 00:05:46.019
You could be the most efficient executor in the
00:05:46.019 --> 00:05:48.000
building, single -handedly keeping the servers
00:05:48.000 --> 00:05:50.660
running, and still have zero influence over the
00:05:50.660 --> 00:05:53.259
strategic direction of the company. She realized
00:05:53.259 --> 00:05:55.779
the absolute necessity of establishing a unique
00:05:55.779 --> 00:05:58.620
perspective. That phrase unique perspective is
00:05:58.620 --> 00:06:01.160
really the dividing line. How so? Well, Victoria
00:06:01.160 --> 00:06:03.079
realized that leadership isn't about shaping
00:06:03.079 --> 00:06:06.009
the work product. It is about shaping perspectives.
00:06:06.449 --> 00:06:09.449
Ah, okay. Doing what you are told perfectly makes
00:06:09.449 --> 00:06:12.189
you a phenomenal employee. But coming to the
00:06:12.189 --> 00:06:14.649
table with a distinct synthesized point of view
00:06:14.649 --> 00:06:16.949
on where the entire industry is pivoting, or
00:06:16.949 --> 00:06:19.550
how a specific practice must evolve to survive
00:06:19.550 --> 00:06:22.050
the next five years. That's entirely different.
00:06:22.569 --> 00:06:24.689
Exactly. That means you are acting as a leader.
00:06:24.910 --> 00:06:27.310
You have to bring a perspective to the room,
00:06:27.370 --> 00:06:29.569
not just a completed assignment. Speaking of
00:06:29.569 --> 00:06:33.230
completed assignments, Swati, a VP at S &P Global,
00:06:33.449 --> 00:06:35.910
shared a really candid story that honestly made
00:06:35.910 --> 00:06:38.329
me pause and scribble in the margins of these
00:06:38.329 --> 00:06:41.670
notes. The story about her employee. Yes. She
00:06:41.670 --> 00:06:44.589
talked about an employee she managed who absolutely
00:06:44.589 --> 00:06:47.850
excelled in execution, hitting every metric and
00:06:47.850 --> 00:06:51.209
delivering flawless work, but who severely struggled
00:06:51.209 --> 00:06:53.269
with decision -making and strategic thinking.
00:06:53.350 --> 00:06:56.720
Right. used this as a primary example to prove
00:06:56.720 --> 00:06:59.180
the need to broadening skill sets for advancement.
00:06:59.959 --> 00:07:02.459
But I have to push back on this on behalf of
00:07:02.459 --> 00:07:04.540
anyone listening who feels stuck in that exact
00:07:04.540 --> 00:07:07.319
spot. Oh, absolutely. Go for it. Wait. So this
00:07:07.319 --> 00:07:09.519
employee was essentially penalized for doing
00:07:09.519 --> 00:07:12.279
their assigned tasks perfectly. How is an employee
00:07:12.279 --> 00:07:14.879
supposed to know when to stop executing and start
00:07:14.879 --> 00:07:17.199
deciding, especially if flawless execution is
00:07:17.199 --> 00:07:19.500
exactly what they were hired, trained, and praised
00:07:19.500 --> 00:07:21.579
for in the first place? That's a great question.
00:07:21.800 --> 00:07:23.759
It just feels like upper management is moving
00:07:23.759 --> 00:07:25.819
the goal posts in the middle of the game? What's
00:07:25.819 --> 00:07:27.879
fascinating here is that it absolutely feels
00:07:27.879 --> 00:07:30.800
like a penalty or like a bait and switch, but
00:07:30.800 --> 00:07:32.959
it is actually a transition into a completely
00:07:32.959 --> 00:07:35.519
different job description. Interesting. We are
00:07:35.519 --> 00:07:37.720
conditioned to view the corporate ladder as a
00:07:37.720 --> 00:07:41.160
straight vertical climb. We just assume being
00:07:41.160 --> 00:07:43.980
the best at step one automatically qualifies
00:07:43.980 --> 00:07:45.800
you and prepares you for step two. Right, because
00:07:45.800 --> 00:07:48.699
that's what we're taught. But the junk from trusted
00:07:48.699 --> 00:07:52.360
doer to strategic leader isn't just a step up
00:07:52.360 --> 00:07:56.180
on the same ladder. It is a terrifying leap to
00:07:56.180 --> 00:07:58.579
a completely different ladder hanging on a different
00:07:58.579 --> 00:08:00.699
wall. Okay, so it sounds like you are saying
00:08:00.699 --> 00:08:03.100
operational dependability is about guarding the
00:08:03.100 --> 00:08:05.759
status quo while strategic leadership is about
00:08:05.759 --> 00:08:07.740
actively disrupting it. Am I reading that right?
00:08:08.000 --> 00:08:10.459
That is the fundamental distinction between operational
00:08:10.459 --> 00:08:14.139
dependability and organizational outcomes. Operational
00:08:14.139 --> 00:08:16.439
dependability is about doing the task right.
00:08:16.660 --> 00:08:20.120
Right. It relies on efficiency, quality control,
00:08:20.300 --> 00:08:23.199
mitigating risk and, you know, hitting deadlines.
00:08:23.220 --> 00:08:26.579
The safe stuff. Exactly. Strategic leadership
00:08:26.579 --> 00:08:29.079
is about doing the right task for the business.
00:08:29.500 --> 00:08:32.639
It requires zooming out, surveying the landscape,
00:08:32.779 --> 00:08:35.960
and asking, does this task even matter? Should
00:08:35.960 --> 00:08:39.220
we be doing this at all? Yes. Or are we burning
00:08:39.220 --> 00:08:42.480
capital on a dying product line? The skill sets
00:08:42.480 --> 00:08:44.559
required for those two functions are entirely
00:08:44.559 --> 00:08:47.360
different. So the employee in Swati's example.
00:08:47.440 --> 00:08:49.100
They were brilliant at doing the task right.
00:08:49.259 --> 00:08:52.399
But when faced with the sheer ambiguity of deciding
00:08:52.399 --> 00:08:54.620
which task would yield the best organizational
00:08:54.620 --> 00:08:57.639
outcome over a five -year horizon, they froze.
00:08:58.539 --> 00:09:00.639
The skills that made them indispensable on the
00:09:00.639 --> 00:09:02.980
execution floor actually hindered their ability
00:09:02.980 --> 00:09:05.100
to strategize. That makes a lot of sense when
00:09:05.100 --> 00:09:07.139
you separate the mechanics. It is the difference
00:09:07.139 --> 00:09:10.200
between navigating a map flawlessly and being
00:09:10.200 --> 00:09:11.960
the person who has to brave the wilderness to
00:09:11.960 --> 00:09:13.759
actually draw the map. That's a great way to
00:09:13.759 --> 00:09:16.080
put it. The map reader relies on parameters,
00:09:16.539 --> 00:09:19.250
but the map maker creates them. And that lack
00:09:19.250 --> 00:09:22.029
of parameters is precisely why execution will
00:09:22.029 --> 00:09:24.950
never naturally evolve into strategy. Realizing
00:09:24.950 --> 00:09:27.669
you have been furiously climbing the wrong ladder
00:09:27.669 --> 00:09:31.590
is a tough pill to swallow. But it begs the practical
00:09:31.590 --> 00:09:34.639
question. If execution isn't the currency of
00:09:34.639 --> 00:09:37.460
leadership, how do you actually signal to the
00:09:37.460 --> 00:09:40.080
higher -ups that you are ready to start drawing
00:09:40.080 --> 00:09:42.879
the map? Right. How do you get out? Yeah. The
00:09:42.879 --> 00:09:45.259
panel didn't just diagnose the illness. They
00:09:45.259 --> 00:09:48.019
provided a very mechanical roadmap for escaping
00:09:48.019 --> 00:09:50.740
the trap by building strategic thinking skills.
00:09:51.039 --> 00:09:53.419
And the strategies they highlight require actively
00:09:53.419 --> 00:09:55.879
changing how you behave in rooms where decisions
00:09:55.879 --> 00:09:58.139
are made. What's the first step? The first major
00:09:58.139 --> 00:10:00.840
shift is the need to ask strategic questions.
00:10:01.259 --> 00:10:04.120
The notes are very clear here. Do not just sit
00:10:04.120 --> 00:10:06.179
in meetings passively waiting for your marching
00:10:06.179 --> 00:10:08.559
orders. You need to pose questions that align
00:10:08.559 --> 00:10:11.460
with broad organizational goals and long -term
00:10:11.460 --> 00:10:13.720
implications. Like that. Let's make this concrete.
00:10:13.840 --> 00:10:15.620
If we are in a meeting about deploying a new
00:10:15.620 --> 00:10:18.580
software patch, the operational trusted doer
00:10:18.580 --> 00:10:21.440
question is, will this patch be deployed by Friday?
00:10:21.919 --> 00:10:24.480
Right. But the strategic question in that exact
00:10:24.480 --> 00:10:28.500
same meeting is, Does this patch align with our
00:10:28.500 --> 00:10:30.419
pivot toward enterprise clients next quarter,
00:10:30.679 --> 00:10:32.879
or are we just throwing engineering hours at
00:10:32.879 --> 00:10:36.159
a Band -Aid for legacy users? Oh, wow. That completely
00:10:36.159 --> 00:10:38.879
changes the vibe. Asking that question completely
00:10:38.879 --> 00:10:41.700
changes the temperature of the room. It signals
00:10:41.700 --> 00:10:44.159
to everyone else at the table that your brain
00:10:44.159 --> 00:10:46.840
is operating on the same frequency as the executive
00:10:46.840 --> 00:10:49.139
team. You are no longer just a pair of hands.
00:10:49.399 --> 00:10:52.500
You are a strategic asset. And the second strategy
00:10:52.500 --> 00:10:55.590
builds on this. You must actively participate
00:10:55.590 --> 00:10:58.090
in broader discussions. By hunting down the right
00:10:58.090 --> 00:11:00.389
meetings. Yeah, you have to hunt down and inject
00:11:00.389 --> 00:11:03.909
yourself into meetings that address larger organizational
00:11:03.909 --> 00:11:07.289
objectives. Even if your role is initially just
00:11:07.289 --> 00:11:10.190
to observe, you have to absorb the strategic
00:11:10.190 --> 00:11:12.850
vision. Right. You simply cannot align your daily
00:11:12.850 --> 00:11:16.129
execution with the big picture if you are completely
00:11:16.129 --> 00:11:18.149
blind to what the big picture is. That concept
00:11:18.149 --> 00:11:20.669
of exposure ties directly into their third point,
00:11:20.730 --> 00:11:23.029
which is networking. But the panel isn't talking
00:11:23.029 --> 00:11:25.789
about, you know, glad handing at a mandatory
00:11:25.789 --> 00:11:27.789
corporate happy hour. Definitely not. They are
00:11:27.789 --> 00:11:30.330
talking about intentionally cultivating connections
00:11:30.330 --> 00:11:33.210
with mentors and cross -functional leaders to
00:11:33.210 --> 00:11:35.870
understand the exact mechanics of how strategy
00:11:35.870 --> 00:11:38.690
is valued within your specific company. Because
00:11:38.690 --> 00:11:41.730
the language of leadership varies wildly from
00:11:41.730 --> 00:11:44.129
culture to culture. That's true. A strategic
00:11:44.129 --> 00:11:47.610
leader at an agile, fast -moving tech startup
00:11:47.610 --> 00:11:50.809
operates with a very different cadence and vocabulary
00:11:50.809 --> 00:11:54.509
than a strategic leader at a legacy, highly regulated
00:11:54.509 --> 00:11:58.179
financial institution like SMP Global. So networking
00:11:58.179 --> 00:12:01.259
is basically how you learn the specific dialect
00:12:01.259 --> 00:12:03.759
of leadership spoken in your environment. Yes.
00:12:04.019 --> 00:12:05.740
You have to study the people who hold the roles
00:12:05.740 --> 00:12:08.179
you want. OK. Then we arrive at the fourth strategy,
00:12:08.559 --> 00:12:11.279
which is undeniably the most mechanically difficult
00:12:11.279 --> 00:12:13.980
one for a high performer to execute. Prioritize
00:12:13.980 --> 00:12:16.539
and delegate. Oh, this is the hardest part. The
00:12:16.539 --> 00:12:18.679
panel emphasizes that you have to face the hard
00:12:18.679 --> 00:12:21.559
truth that executing every single task personally
00:12:21.559 --> 00:12:24.620
will actively suffocate your career growth. Letting
00:12:24.620 --> 00:12:26.419
go of the work that made you famous in the company
00:12:26.419 --> 00:12:28.960
is a massive psychological hurdle for a trusted
00:12:28.960 --> 00:12:31.080
doer. Here's where it gets really interesting,
00:12:31.320 --> 00:12:33.100
because thinking about the mechanics of this,
00:12:33.639 --> 00:12:36.220
it is like shifting from being the lead actor
00:12:36.220 --> 00:12:38.759
on a stage to suddenly becoming the director.
00:12:38.960 --> 00:12:40.700
Oh, I see where you're going. Yeah, the lead
00:12:40.700 --> 00:12:43.659
actor only has to focus on memorizing and delivering
00:12:43.659 --> 00:12:46.340
their own lines perfectly. The parameters are
00:12:46.340 --> 00:12:48.360
fixed by the script. Right. But the director
00:12:48.360 --> 00:12:51.080
has to step off the stage entirely, look at the
00:12:51.080 --> 00:12:53.279
whole theater, the lighting, the pacing, the
00:12:53.279 --> 00:12:56.480
audience reaction. And most importantly, they
00:12:56.480 --> 00:12:59.139
have to abandon the safety of the script to trust
00:12:59.139 --> 00:13:02.399
the actors to do their jobs. But here is the
00:13:02.399 --> 00:13:05.720
massive practical risk I see for you, the listener.
00:13:06.379 --> 00:13:09.460
How do you actually delegate when you are the
00:13:09.460 --> 00:13:12.259
trusted doer that the VP relies on to get it
00:13:12.259 --> 00:13:15.139
done flawlessly? It's a huge fear. Right. If
00:13:15.139 --> 00:13:17.379
your boss hands you a high stakes project because
00:13:17.379 --> 00:13:19.679
they know you won't mess it up and you delegate
00:13:19.679 --> 00:13:22.100
it to a junior team member who completely drops
00:13:22.100 --> 00:13:24.320
the ball, doesn't that failure reflect directly
00:13:24.320 --> 00:13:27.799
on you? That fear of proxy failure is intense,
00:13:27.840 --> 00:13:31.139
and it's completely valid. But this is the exact
00:13:31.139 --> 00:13:33.460
moment where you have to redefine what your actual
00:13:33.460 --> 00:13:36.340
job is. True strategic leadership means shifting
00:13:36.340 --> 00:13:39.820
your entire focus from completing tasks to driving
00:13:39.820 --> 00:13:43.700
organizational outcomes. Let's loop back to Keanda
00:13:43.700 --> 00:13:47.200
and Eddie's realization. OK. If you hold on to
00:13:47.200 --> 00:13:49.620
every critical task because you can execute it
00:13:49.620 --> 00:13:53.240
10 % better than a junior team member, you are
00:13:53.240 --> 00:13:57.240
severely artificially limiting the capacity of
00:13:57.240 --> 00:13:59.470
your entire department. Oh, because you become
00:13:59.470 --> 00:14:02.129
the bottleneck? Yes, you are the bottleneck preventing
00:14:02.129 --> 00:14:04.149
the organization from scaling. Because there's
00:14:04.149 --> 00:14:06.669
only one of you and you only have 24 hours in
00:14:06.669 --> 00:14:09.070
a day, you physically cannot scale yourself.
00:14:09.269 --> 00:14:11.850
Delegation is not about freeing up your afternoon.
00:14:12.230 --> 00:14:15.429
It is a strategic risk assessment exercise. You
00:14:15.429 --> 00:14:18.730
have to actively test your team's failure thresholds
00:14:18.730 --> 00:14:20.850
in controlled environments so the organization
00:14:20.850 --> 00:14:23.269
can grow. Wow, that's a shift. A strategic leader
00:14:23.269 --> 00:14:25.649
accepts that delegating will result in a short
00:14:25.649 --> 00:14:28.500
-term drop in the absolute perfection of a specific
00:14:28.500 --> 00:14:32.000
task. That temporary dip in quality is actually
00:14:32.000 --> 00:14:34.299
the price of admission for long -term scale.
00:14:34.440 --> 00:14:36.740
It frees the leader up to focus their brain power
00:14:36.740 --> 00:14:40.139
on the horizon. Exactly. If you are hoarding
00:14:40.139 --> 00:14:43.200
execution at the expense of strategy, you are
00:14:43.200 --> 00:14:45.659
making an active choice to stay locked in the
00:14:45.659 --> 00:14:47.700
trap. You have to critically audit your workload
00:14:47.700 --> 00:14:50.460
and ask yourself a hard question. Which is? Am
00:14:50.460 --> 00:14:52.639
I doing this because I am literally the only
00:14:52.639 --> 00:14:54.919
human capable of it? Or am I doing it because
00:14:54.919 --> 00:14:57.799
it feels safe and I am addicted to the immediate
00:14:57.799 --> 00:15:00.340
dopamine hit of crossing it off my list? Oof.
00:15:00.679 --> 00:15:02.899
That is a brutal mirror to hold up to your own
00:15:02.899 --> 00:15:04.720
work habits. It really is. But hiding in the
00:15:04.720 --> 00:15:07.779
comfort of execution is so common because, frankly,
00:15:08.200 --> 00:15:10.919
strategy is terrifying. Strategy involves the
00:15:10.919 --> 00:15:13.580
possibility of being completely wrong on a massive
00:15:13.580 --> 00:15:16.480
scale. And that fear perfectly bridges us to
00:15:16.480 --> 00:15:19.720
the next vital piece of this deep dive. Because
00:15:19.720 --> 00:15:22.299
executing mechanical strategies like awkwardly
00:15:22.299 --> 00:15:24.600
forcing a strategic question in a meeting or
00:15:24.600 --> 00:15:26.700
clumsily dumping a project on a co -worker's
00:15:26.700 --> 00:15:29.240
desk will completely collapse if those actions
00:15:29.240 --> 00:15:32.320
aren't powered by genuine internal shift. Yes,
00:15:32.440 --> 00:15:34.940
moving from the mechanical actions you take to
00:15:34.940 --> 00:15:37.519
the internal mindset and authenticity required
00:15:37.519 --> 00:15:40.220
to actually sustain this transformation is where
00:15:40.220 --> 00:15:43.740
the real work begins. The panel dedicated a significant
00:15:43.740 --> 00:15:46.159
portion of their discussion to this internal
00:15:46.159 --> 00:15:49.059
landscape, didn't they? They did. Bukak Akhfik,
00:15:49.440 --> 00:15:52.120
an executive with over 15 years of experience
00:15:52.120 --> 00:15:55.740
in global IT management, heavily emphasized this
00:15:55.740 --> 00:15:58.549
internal shift. What was her main takeaway? She
00:15:58.549 --> 00:16:00.970
noted that visibility combined with strategic
00:16:00.970 --> 00:16:03.610
thinking is paramount for advancement But she
00:16:03.610 --> 00:16:06.350
clarified that visibility doesn't mean being
00:16:06.350 --> 00:16:08.549
the loudest voice in the room, right? It means
00:16:08.549 --> 00:16:10.990
being authentically present and strategically
00:16:10.990 --> 00:16:13.730
aligned the sources make a really nuanced point
00:16:13.730 --> 00:16:16.549
here about authenticity and leadership specifically
00:16:16.549 --> 00:16:19.110
Regarding the strength women often bring to the
00:16:19.110 --> 00:16:21.299
workplace. Yes the relational capital Exactly.
00:16:21.639 --> 00:16:24.720
The panel noted that women often excel at building
00:16:24.720 --> 00:16:27.320
relational capital. Rather than trying to adopt
00:16:27.320 --> 00:16:30.679
a stereotypical, aggressive, top -down command
00:16:30.679 --> 00:16:33.059
style of leadership, which often backfires anyway,
00:16:33.559 --> 00:16:35.639
they should leverage this relational strength.
00:16:35.779 --> 00:16:37.419
To articulate their accomplishments clearly.
00:16:37.659 --> 00:16:39.779
Right, and communicate the impact of their work.
00:16:39.919 --> 00:16:42.759
It is about authentic, influence -based communication
00:16:42.759 --> 00:16:45.450
rather than sheer authority. It is framing your
00:16:45.450 --> 00:16:49.029
success not as a lone wolf victory, but as a
00:16:49.029 --> 00:16:52.409
relational cross -functional win that tangibly
00:16:52.409 --> 00:16:55.450
drove the business forward. You are weaving your
00:16:55.450 --> 00:16:58.070
personal execution into the broader narrative
00:16:58.070 --> 00:17:00.830
of the company's success. That collaborative
00:17:00.830 --> 00:17:03.230
mindset ties directly into the panel's heavy
00:17:03.230 --> 00:17:06.250
focus on mentorship and community building. The
00:17:06.250 --> 00:17:08.549
panel noted that actively sharing knowledge with
00:17:08.549 --> 00:17:11.289
others and lifting up colleagues actually reinforces
00:17:11.289 --> 00:17:13.690
your own position as a leader in the eyes of
00:17:13.690 --> 00:17:15.470
management. It shows you're thinking about the
00:17:15.470 --> 00:17:19.089
whole team. Exactly. Engaging in community -oriented
00:17:19.089 --> 00:17:21.710
initiatives presents a holistic, highly motivated
00:17:21.710 --> 00:17:24.130
leadership persona. You elevate yourself from
00:17:24.130 --> 00:17:26.549
being a highly efficient cog in the machine to
00:17:26.549 --> 00:17:28.750
someone who is actively upgrading the entire
00:17:28.750 --> 00:17:30.930
ecosystem around you. And generating that kind
00:17:30.930 --> 00:17:33.799
of ecosystem impact requires committing to very
00:17:33.799 --> 00:17:37.119
specific, actionable mindset shifts. Right, like
00:17:37.119 --> 00:17:39.640
continuous learning. First, a relentless commitment
00:17:39.640 --> 00:17:42.119
to continuous learning. A strategist toolkit
00:17:42.119 --> 00:17:45.000
is never complete. Second, as we touched on,
00:17:45.279 --> 00:17:47.359
you must forcefully shift your daily conversations
00:17:47.359 --> 00:17:49.880
away from task completion metrics and towards
00:17:49.880 --> 00:17:52.079
strategic impact measurements. And then there's
00:17:52.079 --> 00:17:54.880
the third mindset shift, which the panel highlighted
00:17:54.880 --> 00:17:57.240
as perhaps the most critical defining trait of
00:17:57.240 --> 00:18:00.940
a true leader. Embrace ambiguity. Yes. They define
00:18:00.940 --> 00:18:03.359
this as the ability to handle severe uncertainty
00:18:03.359 --> 00:18:06.700
and complexity in decision making. So what does
00:18:06.700 --> 00:18:08.460
this all mean? I want to pull this out of the
00:18:08.460 --> 00:18:10.440
clouds and look at the mechanics. Sure. What
00:18:10.440 --> 00:18:13.740
does embracing ambiguity actually look like in
00:18:13.740 --> 00:18:16.619
practice on a random Tuesday morning at the office?
00:18:17.180 --> 00:18:20.460
Is it just projecting a calm aura while secretly
00:18:20.460 --> 00:18:23.000
having no idea what to do? Well, if we connect
00:18:23.000 --> 00:18:24.880
this to the bigger picture, it goes back to our
00:18:24.880 --> 00:18:28.000
map reader versus map maker analogy. OK. When
00:18:28.000 --> 00:18:31.240
you are executing a task, there are fixed noble
00:18:31.240 --> 00:18:33.779
parameters. There is a documented right way and
00:18:33.779 --> 00:18:36.359
a wrong way to run a software test or balance
00:18:36.359 --> 00:18:38.940
a general ledger or compile a quarterly report.
00:18:39.400 --> 00:18:42.220
The metrics for success are known, historical,
00:18:42.480 --> 00:18:45.019
and safe. You can basically grade execution on
00:18:45.019 --> 00:18:48.720
a rubric. Exactly. But strategy cannot be graded
00:18:48.720 --> 00:18:52.000
on a rubric until years later. Strategy is inherently
00:18:52.000 --> 00:18:54.859
ambiguous, because by definition, you are dealing
00:18:54.859 --> 00:18:57.559
with the future, and the future is entirely unknown.
00:18:58.119 --> 00:19:00.720
So on a Tuesday morning... On a Tuesday morning,
00:19:01.380 --> 00:19:03.400
embracing ambiguity looks like your engineering
00:19:03.400 --> 00:19:05.940
team staring at you and saying, option A costs
00:19:05.940 --> 00:19:08.400
less, but takes three months longer, potentially
00:19:08.400 --> 00:19:11.099
missing the product launch window. Option B is
00:19:11.099 --> 00:19:13.759
faster, but uses an untested architecture that
00:19:13.759 --> 00:19:16.819
might crash. We've exhausted our research, and
00:19:16.819 --> 00:19:19.779
we simply do not have enough data to know for
00:19:19.779 --> 00:19:23.029
sure which is mathematically better, what do
00:19:23.029 --> 00:19:25.809
we do? Wow. And as a trusted doer, your knee
00:19:25.809 --> 00:19:28.529
-jerk instinct is to say, give me three days
00:19:28.529 --> 00:19:31.049
to run advanced simulations, pull more data,
00:19:31.150 --> 00:19:33.829
and I will find the perfect risk -free answer.
00:19:33.970 --> 00:19:36.509
And that instinct will kill your strategic value.
00:19:36.700 --> 00:19:39.599
Really? Yes. The strategic leader understands
00:19:39.599 --> 00:19:41.740
that waiting three days for perfect data might
00:19:41.740 --> 00:19:44.740
cost them the entire market opportunity. True
00:19:44.740 --> 00:19:46.900
leaders make massive decisions without having
00:19:46.900 --> 00:19:49.200
100 % of the data. They just have to go for it.
00:19:49.240 --> 00:19:51.619
They synthesize the 50 or 60 % of information
00:19:51.619 --> 00:19:54.299
they have, apply their unique perspective and
00:19:54.299 --> 00:19:56.980
industry intuition like Victoria Zitzak talked
00:19:56.980 --> 00:20:00.220
about, and they make a definitive call, fully
00:20:00.220 --> 00:20:02.319
absorbing the risk of being wrong. That takes
00:20:02.319 --> 00:20:05.579
a lot of nerve. It does. And this raises an important
00:20:05.579 --> 00:20:08.029
question. And it is something I want you to critically
00:20:08.029 --> 00:20:10.210
analyze in your own career. What's the question?
00:20:10.329 --> 00:20:12.349
What stands out to you about the difference between
00:20:12.349 --> 00:20:15.789
solving a clear, bounded problem and navigating
00:20:15.789 --> 00:20:18.970
a messy, ambiguous one? Because your personal
00:20:18.970 --> 00:20:21.910
tolerance for navigating that ambiguity directly
00:20:21.910 --> 00:20:24.609
dictates your ceiling as a leader. That is a
00:20:24.609 --> 00:20:27.380
phenomenal distinction. The trusted doer solves
00:20:27.380 --> 00:20:30.380
the clear problem. The strategic leader navigates
00:20:30.380 --> 00:20:32.599
the ambiguous one. And the shift from one to
00:20:32.599 --> 00:20:35.619
the other requires entirely rewiring how you
00:20:35.619 --> 00:20:38.259
evaluate your own worth. We have covered a tremendous
00:20:38.259 --> 00:20:40.759
amount of ground here today, tracing this journey
00:20:40.759 --> 00:20:43.460
from the incredibly frustrating depths of the
00:20:43.460 --> 00:20:46.619
trusted doer trap all the way up to the psychological
00:20:46.619 --> 00:20:49.299
rewiring required for strategic leadership. It's
00:20:49.299 --> 00:20:51.279
a big journey. To bring all these mechanical
00:20:51.279 --> 00:20:53.940
threads together for you. Remember that the transition
00:20:53.940 --> 00:20:56.039
from a trusted doer to a strategic leader is
00:20:56.039 --> 00:20:58.519
not about working harder. The harsh truth is,
00:20:58.839 --> 00:21:01.380
you are likely already working at maximum capacity.
00:21:01.920 --> 00:21:05.039
More effort will only yield burnout. It is fundamentally
00:21:05.039 --> 00:21:07.279
about working differently. It is moving your
00:21:07.279 --> 00:21:11.240
days from tasks to outcomes. Exactly. It is transitioning
00:21:11.240 --> 00:21:14.099
from flawlessly answering operational questions
00:21:14.099 --> 00:21:18.059
to aggressively asking strategic ones. It is
00:21:18.059 --> 00:21:20.859
abandoning the dopamine hit of hoarding execution
00:21:20.859 --> 00:21:24.339
to embrace the messy, terrifying ambiguity of
00:21:24.339 --> 00:21:27.000
delegation and strategy. And whether you are
00:21:27.000 --> 00:21:30.609
a woman in tech navigating these specific deeply
00:21:30.609 --> 00:21:34.369
ingrained industry hurdles or anyone in any field
00:21:34.369 --> 00:21:38.089
trying to plot out a complex career path. The
00:21:38.089 --> 00:21:41.049
trap of exceptional execution is a universal
00:21:41.049 --> 00:21:43.549
hurdle. It really is. It is almost a professional
00:21:43.549 --> 00:21:46.359
rite of passage. Yeah. Everyone who ascends has
00:21:46.359 --> 00:21:48.240
to figure out how to stop being the workhorse.
00:21:48.380 --> 00:21:50.279
You do not have to stay stuck in it. No, you
00:21:50.279 --> 00:21:52.319
absolutely don't. But as we wrap up this deep
00:21:52.319 --> 00:21:54.380
dive, I want to leave you with a final slightly
00:21:54.380 --> 00:21:56.460
provocative thought to mull over on your own
00:21:56.460 --> 00:21:58.319
time. Oh, I like where this is going. Something
00:21:58.319 --> 00:22:00.059
that builds on what these incredible panelists
00:22:00.059 --> 00:22:02.359
shared, but takes the lens and flips it back
00:22:02.359 --> 00:22:04.240
onto the corporate structure itself. Let's hear
00:22:04.240 --> 00:22:07.180
it. We have spent this entire time dissecting
00:22:07.180 --> 00:22:10.460
what you can do to escape this trap. But consider
00:22:10.460 --> 00:22:13.160
the system you are operating within. The source
00:22:13.160 --> 00:22:15.799
material highlights that exceptional work consistently
00:22:15.799 --> 00:22:18.799
leads to more work rather than a promotion. A
00:22:18.799 --> 00:22:22.180
frustrating yet incredibly common reality. Could
00:22:22.180 --> 00:22:24.039
it be that traditional corporate reward systems
00:22:24.039 --> 00:22:26.819
aren't just accidentally flawed? Is it possible
00:22:26.819 --> 00:22:29.619
they are intentionally designed to extract maximum
00:22:29.619 --> 00:22:32.980
high -quality labor from trusted doers by dangling
00:22:32.980 --> 00:22:35.319
a strategic leadership carrot that they are never
00:22:35.319 --> 00:22:38.319
actually permitted to reach? Wow. Simply because
00:22:38.319 --> 00:22:40.839
they are deemed far too valuable and far too
00:22:40.839 --> 00:22:43.359
profitable on the execution floor to ever be
00:22:43.359 --> 00:22:45.480
promoted off of it. Analyzing whether your company
00:22:45.480 --> 00:22:47.519
actually wants you to grow or just wants you
00:22:47.519 --> 00:22:50.480
to produce is a chilling thought. but a necessary
00:22:50.480 --> 00:22:52.539
one to entertain if you want to take control
00:22:52.539 --> 00:22:55.019
of your trajectory. I want to challenge you to
00:22:55.019 --> 00:22:56.940
take a hard look at the architecture of your
00:22:56.940 --> 00:23:00.480
own organization. Is the structure actively working
00:23:00.480 --> 00:23:03.299
against your transition? Do your managers actually
00:23:03.299 --> 00:23:06.339
reward strategic risk, or do they only reward
00:23:06.339 --> 00:23:08.779
solid execution? It's a crucial question. And
00:23:08.779 --> 00:23:12.019
if the system is designed to trap you, how might
00:23:12.019 --> 00:23:15.289
you strategically disrupt that cycle? Because
00:23:15.289 --> 00:23:17.490
if you are the one always bringing that perfect
00:23:17.490 --> 00:23:20.650
three -tier chocolate cake to the potluck, maybe
00:23:20.650 --> 00:23:23.130
it is time to stop baking. Bring the store -bought
00:23:23.130 --> 00:23:25.730
cookies. Exactly. Let someone else bring the
00:23:25.730 --> 00:23:27.890
store -bought cookies for a change. Pull up a
00:23:27.890 --> 00:23:30.349
chair and demand a seat at the table where the
00:23:30.349 --> 00:23:32.329
actual event is being planned. Leave the whisk
00:23:32.329 --> 00:23:33.569
at home. Take the pen.