درباره این اپیزود
A bombshell shift in the Lindsay Clancy case?
On Breaking the Case with Jen Coffindaffer FBI, Jen and attorney Philip Dubé break down Kevin Reddington’s latest argument that there is “no evidence” Lindsay killed her children—a dramatic change from the defense’s previous focus on postpartum psychosis.
Could the defense now be pointing toward Patrick Clancy or another third party?
Philip examines the legal consequences of that strategy, including Lindsay’s prior statements, the 911 call, testimony from Patrick and a hospital chaplain, and statements made to mental-health experts during the first trial.
They also discuss how testimony from the first trial could potentially be used again if the case goes forward.
Is this a new defense strategy—or a major legal gamble?
#BreakTheCase #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyCase #KevinReddington #PhilipDube #PatrickClancy #CoraClancy #DawsonClancy #CallanClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #JuryDeliberations #CriminalJustice #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeCommunity #JenCoffindaffer #CoffindafferFBI
