درباره این اپیزود
In this second episode of our VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain, Ambiguous, and Complex) series, we move from defining the concept to discussing practical strategies for navigating such challenging landscapes. Listen in as we share insights on the importance of adaptability, self-awareness, and learning agility at both individual and team levels.
Lastly, we underscore the power of reflection and psychological safety in fostering resilient leadership and team dynamics. Drawing on Amy Edmondson's insights, we illustrate how creating a secure environment encourages risk-taking and learning. The Dimensions of Learning Organization Questionnaire (DLOQ) and the 70-20-10 model of learning are highlighted as tools for continuous organizational growth. Join us for an engaging conversation filled with practical tips to enhance leadership and organizational resilience in a VUCA landscape.
Whether you're a leader, team member, or simply curious about effective leadership, this episode is packed with valuable tips and thoughtful reflections to help you thrive amidst uncertainty.
Don't forget to reach out to us at boundlesscuriosity@outlookcom with your thoughts and suggestions!
یادداشت ها را نشان دهید 🔗
رونوشت 🔗
00:00:40.475 --> 00:00:44.603
Hello Jason, Really excited to jump into another episode with you today.
00:00:44.603 --> 00:00:45.463
How are you doing today?
00:00:46.310 --> 00:00:47.073
I'm doing pretty well.
00:00:47.073 --> 00:00:47.817
How about you, Brandon?
00:00:48.109 --> 00:00:52.177
Yeah, great, it has actually been a few weeks since we last connected.
00:00:52.177 --> 00:00:55.643
I think you've been on vacation, maybe, so you're looking refreshed.
00:00:55.643 --> 00:00:58.317
Maybe even you still have a vacation shirt on there.
00:00:58.317 --> 00:00:59.780
What's going on on your shirt?
00:01:01.551 --> 00:01:04.640
They're little campers, oh little campers.
00:01:04.640 --> 00:01:09.560
Always going to have a little flare, that's just the way I roll.
00:01:09.560 --> 00:01:11.070
But yes, I did take this on vacation.
00:01:11.070 --> 00:01:11.912
We were on a cruise.
00:01:11.912 --> 00:01:13.456
It was lovely.
00:01:13.456 --> 00:01:17.490
I don't know if I'm a cruise person, but I'm glad we did it.
00:01:17.490 --> 00:01:20.234
It was a very nice week.
00:01:20.234 --> 00:01:21.015
And how have you been?
00:01:21.555 --> 00:01:22.457
Yeah, everything's good.
00:01:22.457 --> 00:01:28.006
No cruises for me, although I have been on two and I may not do another one again.
00:01:28.006 --> 00:01:46.290
I'm not certain, but I'm probably not a cruiser either, and I feel like you could probably divide the world into cruisers and non-cruisers if you wanted to, because I've met some people who have done it 10, 15, 20 times, and then other people who have either done it none or done it once and said you know what?
00:01:46.290 --> 00:01:47.456
This is not for me.
00:01:49.091 --> 00:01:51.616
Yeah, I think that's right, Given your background.
00:01:51.616 --> 00:01:59.479
I wonder if we could do some correlations between Hogan, or something like that, and people who love cruises or people who don't love cruises.
00:02:00.522 --> 00:02:07.217
Fascinating, so my hypothesis would be lower openness to experience less cruising action.
00:02:07.217 --> 00:02:10.813
I don't know if that's a real thing, but that would be my guess.
00:02:11.455 --> 00:02:12.157
Oh, that's really nice.
00:02:12.157 --> 00:02:12.680
I like that.
00:02:12.680 --> 00:02:13.181
That's good.
00:02:13.181 --> 00:02:16.219
I went with low sociability, yeah.
00:02:16.219 --> 00:02:18.737
So I don't know if that maybe that's factoring in.
00:02:18.737 --> 00:02:21.612
I think I'm getting lower in my sociability as I get older.
00:02:21.633 --> 00:02:23.254
I that's factoring in, I think I'm getting lower in my sociability as I get older.
00:02:23.254 --> 00:02:27.139
I would agree I've only known you for two years, but that jabs with my experience.
00:02:27.199 --> 00:02:29.040
Oh, you're seeing a downward trend.
00:02:29.322 --> 00:02:30.742
Yeah, yeah, yeah, absolutely.
00:02:30.742 --> 00:02:37.751
But we are not here to talk about cruises today, believe it or not.
00:02:37.751 --> 00:02:45.433
For those of you who tuned in for that purpose, you can go ahead and shut us off now, if that's what you're here to listen to, because we are actually going to dive back into our second episode on VUCA.
00:02:45.433 --> 00:02:48.180
We talked last episode about the topic.
00:02:48.180 --> 00:02:55.972
Jason, I think you're going to run us through a little bit of what we talked about last time, so with that, I'll flip it over to you so I don't have to do it.
00:02:55.972 --> 00:02:58.075
Well, yeah, right.
00:02:58.896 --> 00:03:01.120
I said I was going to do it and you said I didn't sound very confident.
00:03:01.120 --> 00:03:20.790
So I'm going to go into that, I'm going to embrace my lack of confidence, but we wanted to, just for those who haven't, definitely go back and read or listen to the previous episode, I think it was a really good treatment of this kind of foundational topic that Brandon and I see in our work in leadership, development, organizational development.
00:03:20.790 --> 00:03:25.322
So we talked about VUCA, what it stands for, right, volatility, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity.
00:03:25.322 --> 00:03:33.849
We talked a little bit about where it came from origin, us military, you know, kind of kicked around some thoughts around like how relevant could it be?
00:03:33.849 --> 00:03:49.831
Like if we're applying it to war fighting and then all of a sudden we're applying it to, like you know, how organizations run, I think.
00:03:49.850 --> 00:04:01.302
Think like we eventually kind of landed on like there's definitely merits to it, it definitely speaks to some dynamic that is relevant to leaders and organizations and I think that, you know, one of the things that jumped out to me from last time was really looking at VUCA through like a couple of different lenses.
00:04:01.302 --> 00:04:17.420
So, like you know, this idea of like complicated and complex, adaptive and technical challenges, things that don't have easy answers, were a couple of the areas where we spent a little bit of time just getting at why it's important in the world that we live in.
00:04:17.420 --> 00:04:26.147
And another piece that jumps out to me that I still think about is like is VUCA unique to the 21st century?
00:04:26.147 --> 00:04:33.123
And I think we both of us agree that it seems to be, you know, a passenger along on the human journey.
00:04:33.123 --> 00:04:38.161
It just happens to be a time of a really high volatility uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity.
00:04:38.161 --> 00:04:38.892
How was that?
00:04:38.892 --> 00:04:39.495
What did I miss?
00:04:40.810 --> 00:04:43.579
Jason, that was fantastic.
00:04:43.579 --> 00:04:46.199
Maybe people don't even need to listen to our previous episode.
00:04:46.199 --> 00:04:49.199
Maybe they should just listen to that two-minute soundbite.
00:04:49.199 --> 00:04:51.699
I think that really captures the highlights.
00:04:51.699 --> 00:04:56.641
In all honesty, there is so much in that previous episode that people really should check out.
00:04:56.641 --> 00:04:58.430
I think that's a nice recap.
00:04:58.569 --> 00:05:06.615
The one thing that I would add, and something I've really been sitting with since you and I last spoke, is is the concept still.
00:05:06.615 --> 00:05:08.199
Is it still serving us?
00:05:08.199 --> 00:05:13.776
And something that you and I talked about was that sometimes maybe we can use VUCA as a crutch.
00:05:13.776 --> 00:05:22.586
If a project doesn't go according to plan, if your team's not operating well, if your strategy for your organization is failing, I think some people just point and say, well, of course things for your organization is failing.
00:05:22.586 --> 00:05:31.379
I think some people just point and say, well, of course things didn't work out, because we're in this VUCA world and how can you navigate it and predict it?
00:05:31.379 --> 00:05:48.865
So there is this need to maybe acknowledge that it exists and also, let's still take some agency over how we're leading our teams, leading our organizations, despite the VUCA times that we are in.
00:05:50.975 --> 00:05:52.543
I love that that you brought that back up.
00:05:52.543 --> 00:06:05.206
Like VUCA is a crutch right, Anytime you name something, you're always in danger of somebody taking and using it as an excuse for something else, so I probably do that as well somebody taking it and using it as an excuse for something else.
00:06:05.227 --> 00:06:05.949
So I probably do that as well.
00:06:05.949 --> 00:06:16.975
Yeah, yeah, that's an easy approach sometimes, I believe, to just point to that VUCA thing over in the corner and say, yep, that's why this project, this organization, this team is not being successful.
00:06:16.975 --> 00:06:23.677
And I think a lot of what we did last time, jason, is what I've referred to as admiring the problem.
00:06:23.677 --> 00:06:32.055
We spent a lot of time talking about, ah, vuca, here's what it is, here's how it's shown up in the past, here's how it shows up now.
00:06:32.055 --> 00:06:40.360
We talked about whether it serves us to really focus in on it so much, and the paradox is we're spending two episodes on this.
00:06:40.360 --> 00:06:49.393
So we do think that it is important for us to spend a little bit of time chatting about and today I believe we're shifting the focus a little bit on the conversation.
00:06:50.454 --> 00:06:52.078
Yeah, yeah, and I think that's.
00:06:52.078 --> 00:07:09.143
I think you know, a topic like this does deserve to be split up a little bit, like there's a lot going on with it, and I our focus today I'm really excited about because we get to take that concept, we get to take that admiring the problem and then hopefully make it like practical and applicable Right.
00:07:09.143 --> 00:07:11.737
So well, we face a VUCA world, ok, so what?
00:07:11.737 --> 00:07:12.701
Well, what can we do with it?
00:07:12.701 --> 00:07:14.131
And I think that's where we're going to be today.
00:07:14.992 --> 00:07:20.778
Yeah, and I think we're still keeping to our idea that there are no easy answers on this podcast.
00:07:20.778 --> 00:07:48.002
So, while we will talk through some ideas, some suggestions, some ways to think about navigating in a VUCA landscape, the reality is that, jason and I, we don't have the decoder ring to where we can just show it and tell you exactly what you need to do in a VUCA environment, because the nature of a VUCA environment is there isn't that step-by-step guideline that you're able to just jump into and follow those directions.
00:07:48.670 --> 00:07:49.694
You didn't get the decoder ring.
00:07:50.076 --> 00:07:50.737
I did not.
00:07:50.737 --> 00:07:52.196
Is that in the mail or something?
00:07:52.196 --> 00:07:53.636
I didn't check the mail yesterday.
00:07:53.636 --> 00:07:56.817
If I had that, do I need it for this episode?
00:07:57.579 --> 00:07:58.401
Oh, probably not.
00:07:58.401 --> 00:08:06.444
I wonder if you have to buy enough sandwiches or something so that you get your punch card punched and then you get the decoder and you actually figure it all out.
00:08:06.910 --> 00:08:09.656
I was thinking more of a bottom of the cereal box type thing.
00:08:09.656 --> 00:08:20.605
I don't know if they even still do that now, but I imagine when you were a child, jason very similar for myself we were all about getting to the bottom of the cereal box because there was some little prize in there.
00:08:20.605 --> 00:08:23.932
Maybe it was a decoder ring that I have since lost.
00:08:24.513 --> 00:08:25.314
Yes, yes.
00:08:25.314 --> 00:08:31.632
So I very much remember those and uh, and then, like happy meal toys, um, those, those were.
00:08:31.632 --> 00:08:32.716
Those were some of my favorites.
00:08:33.256 --> 00:08:35.701
Yeah, yeah, absolutely yeah.
00:08:35.701 --> 00:08:37.934
So where do we go from here then?
00:08:37.934 --> 00:08:46.395
Happy meal toys, and I don't really know where to take it happy mill toys and I don't really know where to take it.
00:08:46.415 --> 00:08:46.817
Well, you know, let me.
00:08:46.817 --> 00:08:51.716
Let me digress just a little further and say happy birthday, because, in addition to sharing a last name, we share a birthday as well, which just barely happened.
00:08:52.236 --> 00:09:01.390
That is absolutely true, thank you, and for me it was a milestone birthday, so I think I'm a couple of years behind you, but yeah, big 4-0 for me.
00:09:02.251 --> 00:09:02.913
Congratulations.
00:09:02.913 --> 00:09:05.314
I don't know if mine's a milestone or not 45.
00:09:05.314 --> 00:09:10.500
So I can't say that I'm in my early to mid-40s now.
00:09:10.500 --> 00:09:14.222
Yeah, you're in your mid-40s now, Very well below 440.
00:09:14.683 --> 00:09:17.866
If we had to round, we would say that you were 50 instead of 40.
00:09:17.866 --> 00:09:18.610
Damn it.
00:09:18.610 --> 00:09:23.551
Well, I don't know if we're going to do that, just saying damn it.
00:09:23.551 --> 00:09:25.197
Well, I don't know if we're gonna do that, just saying, not saying we have to.
00:09:25.197 --> 00:09:27.065
But if we were to round we, we would be counting you in the 50 crowd, my friend.
00:09:27.085 --> 00:09:30.354
That's one more piece of evidence why I don't like matt fair, fair.
00:09:30.935 --> 00:09:33.721
Yeah, well, we're good, so let's get into it.
00:09:33.721 --> 00:09:35.952
Let's talk about vuca and some of these practical tips.
00:09:35.952 --> 00:09:37.055
Where, where should we start?
00:09:37.798 --> 00:09:50.045
well, you know, I I was, as we were prepared for this episode, I was struck by know how many, how you thought through it, like in sort of different levels and you know individual and then you know kind of going up more broadly.
00:09:50.045 --> 00:09:53.880
I definitely thought about it a little bit more from the individual level, so maybe we start there.
00:09:54.990 --> 00:10:02.379
Yeah, I like that individual level and something we've likely mentioned in the past, there's all these different levels of analysis.
00:10:02.379 --> 00:10:06.879
Where you go to look at a problem, you can very much focus in at the individual level.
00:10:06.879 --> 00:10:09.217
You can focus in at the team level.
00:10:09.217 --> 00:10:11.836
Maybe you're looking at the organizational level.
00:10:11.836 --> 00:10:13.280
I love to start.
00:10:13.280 --> 00:10:15.109
Let's start at the bottom and think individually.
00:10:15.109 --> 00:10:24.229
And before we do that, jason, something that I find fascinating about this VUCA concept is it's really an opportunity.
00:10:24.229 --> 00:10:53.984
If you're willing to lean into VUCA, recognize that it's there and maybe not use it as a crutch but instead use it as a strategic advantage, recognizing that VUCA exists and that you're going to take some very calculated and specific steps to navigate the environment, that this might actually be something beneficial for you in terms of how you perform and how you show up individually and with your team and organization.
00:10:55.049 --> 00:11:02.236
Yeah, I mean almost like you know, it's like something that that can kind of set you apart in a way can kind of set you apart in a way.
00:11:02.376 --> 00:11:15.599
Yeah, you know, when you were kind of introducing that concept, what came up for me was something that, like it was a long time ago I was applying for a job and really they were talking about ambiguity.
00:11:15.599 --> 00:11:20.315
You know, it was a lot of ambiguity, a lot of ambiguity, and it made me reflect on, like well, how do I, what do I think of ambiguity?
00:11:20.315 --> 00:11:24.813
And when it comes to I mean, when it comes to some things, I hate it.
00:11:24.813 --> 00:11:25.716
It makes me very uncomfortable.
00:11:25.716 --> 00:11:30.563
When it comes to other things at work, I often view ambiguity as a little bit of like an opportunity.
00:11:30.563 --> 00:11:33.112
It means like not everything has been figured out yet.
00:11:33.112 --> 00:11:35.980
There's a lot of space to try new things, and that gets me excited.
00:11:38.009 --> 00:11:38.490
Yeah, and I.
00:11:38.490 --> 00:11:48.545
I would think that someone who leans towards that way of thinking would be able to navigate VUCA much easier than someone who gets a little bit stuck.
00:11:48.545 --> 00:11:56.063
Maybe they're so planful, and maybe even rigid, that they don't know how to operate and be adaptable in those situations.
00:11:56.971 --> 00:11:57.954
Yeah, I think that makes.
00:11:57.954 --> 00:12:00.294
I think that's, I think that's right, I think that makes a lot of sense.
00:12:00.294 --> 00:12:35.145
I think that's right, I think that makes a lot of sense and I think with a major caveat that like it really depends, right like in how VUCA shows up, whether or not that's something that, like, I view as an opportunity or as I view as happening, and what was going to happen was incredibly uncomfortable and it was something I didn't view as anything but like a really like something to be kind of a burden to be shouldered at the hard time, to be moved through.
00:12:35.145 --> 00:12:37.130
So it really does shift, I think.
00:12:38.030 --> 00:12:40.252
Yeah, thanks for sharing that, jason.
00:12:40.252 --> 00:12:48.818
And as we're thinking about, then, vuca at the individual level, those skills, competencies, how we're navigating it.
00:12:48.818 --> 00:12:55.702
Where have you seen, jason, that VUCA, those individuals who are able to navigate this VUCA environment very well?
00:12:55.702 --> 00:12:57.864
What sets those individuals apart?
00:12:58.945 --> 00:12:59.365
Yeah, you know.
00:12:59.365 --> 00:13:00.646
So I have a couple of thoughts here.
00:13:00.646 --> 00:13:00.947
I mean.
00:13:00.947 --> 00:13:19.035
One of them is like, whenever, whenever we're approaching anything new, like whether it's change, and like a new challenge at work, like a new challenge in life, new opportunity, like to me like there's a lot of benefit in getting really like self-aware, like as much as possible, about like you know, you know what, what do I bring into this?
00:13:19.035 --> 00:13:20.800
Like, what do I need to be looking out for?
00:13:25.469 --> 00:13:33.878
And I think, like one of the things when it comes to VUCA that I've seen is being really helpful, especially with, like coachees that I work with, is doing a lot of work around like what their values are, and you know there are lots of different ways to approach that.
00:13:33.878 --> 00:13:38.982
There are lists, you know, out on the internet, you know, with lists of values.
00:13:38.982 --> 00:13:41.232
I have a worksheet that I like to use, Lists of values.
00:13:41.232 --> 00:13:42.093
I have a worksheet that I like to use.
00:13:42.093 --> 00:14:00.537
I've seen like value sorts and whatnot, but it really is like taking an approach to get really clear on things that are deeply important to you and they often, you know, come down to five to seven.
00:14:00.758 --> 00:14:10.676
You know, aware of those things, especially like in an uncertain, volatile environment, is really helpful when it comes to like decisions, Like if you've got a decision and there's not a clear answer.
00:14:10.676 --> 00:14:16.381
You know, being clear on kind of what your values say can help to guide you through that space.
00:14:16.381 --> 00:14:20.569
Um, you know, one of the values that I have is around like relationships.
00:14:20.569 --> 00:14:29.674
So when I think about um, when I think about like decisions that I make or like actions that I take, I'm often thinking about the impact that they're going to have on relationships.
00:14:29.674 --> 00:14:32.060
Um, so, like that's that's.
00:14:32.060 --> 00:14:33.210
It can be a double edged sword.
00:14:33.210 --> 00:14:44.762
Sometimes I can get a little paralyzed by thinking about those things, but I, but then that's where other values might come into place, like having an impact or something like that that might help me to kind of get dislodged when I get stuck.
00:14:44.762 --> 00:14:52.276
So values are a big thing that I see that are helpful to leaders, individuals navigating VUCA.
00:14:53.800 --> 00:14:58.211
I have been through your values exercise and workshop there, jason.
00:14:58.251 --> 00:15:04.049
That's certainly something in a future podcast We'll have to talk more about values, because I think it is so powerful.
00:15:04.610 --> 00:15:19.459
I think your values and kind of your mission statement and your why can serve as the North Star for you as you're navigating some of these difficult and challenging situations that you may encounter in a VUCA landscape, and also love that you highlighted self-awareness.
00:15:19.509 --> 00:15:25.882
Something that you and I have talked about in some of our developmental work that we do is that with awareness comes choice.
00:15:25.882 --> 00:15:47.750
When you're aware of those areas, those tendencies you have that serve you well and maybe don't serve you so well, you have some choice in how you choose to show up, and what's so fascinating about our individual strengths and personal challenges is that how they show up is so situational.
00:15:47.750 --> 00:15:55.604
Some of those very same things that made you effective in one scenario may actually hinder you in other scenarios.
00:15:55.604 --> 00:16:05.612
So, not only aware of your strengths, opportunities, your values, but also when they're serving you well and when sometimes they might challenge you also.
00:16:05.612 --> 00:16:21.116
So, for example, if you very much value stability, for example, value stability routine, being aware of that as it relates to working in a VUCA space, might help you bring some awareness of some angst you might be experiencing.
00:16:22.298 --> 00:16:44.756
Yeah, really really good, really good point there, and I think like so that that awareness allows you to then put into place like different strategies and different actions to maybe get yourself a little bit of like routine or get yourself a little bit of structure, when there isn't a lot of like structure to be had, naturally, where things are shifting so much.
00:16:44.756 --> 00:16:49.741
So it, like I mean like the word, like the term kind of coping um comes up.
00:16:49.741 --> 00:16:56.894
It's not maybe the best word, but it it allows you like more moves to find, like to find ways to work within your preference.
00:16:57.637 --> 00:17:00.077
Yeah, really like that, jason, thanks.
00:17:00.289 --> 00:17:04.011
Thanks for drawing that out, really like that, jason, thanks, thanks for drawing that out.
00:17:04.011 --> 00:17:18.940
The you know that, and that's that's not a bad segue into another one that I wanted to bring out for us, and that's like this idea of like, just like having a structured approach to solving a challenge, especially if it's one that has high complexity to it.
00:17:18.940 --> 00:17:23.262
You know, and and there's different ways to think about this.
00:17:23.262 --> 00:17:37.089
So one of the one of the ways that I'm a big fan of is design thinking, and so that's, like you know, human centered design is a big part of it, and it's about, like you know, another like.
00:17:37.089 --> 00:17:39.617
So like, having the like a person at the center of like thinking through a challenge, I think is really important.
00:17:39.617 --> 00:17:49.585
So, rather than like a process rather than like an outcome, rather than something, a process rather than like an outcome, rather than something like thinking, trying to think through it as much as possible for, like, what is the human impact going to be of this?
00:17:49.585 --> 00:17:51.034
So love that.
00:17:51.114 --> 00:17:58.644
In terms of design thinking, and then the structure around the human often involves a couple of different phases.
00:17:58.644 --> 00:18:01.210
So, like, the first phase is a divergent phase, right?
00:18:01.210 --> 00:18:04.678
So, where you're gathering information and you think about this like brainstorming, right?
00:18:04.678 --> 00:18:10.601
So, putting all of the different possibilities on the table, all the different approaches on the table.
00:18:10.641 --> 00:18:37.558
You bring in diverse perspectives, you know, and so you widen your aperture as much as possible and then you reach a point where you've got a lot of data and then you start the convergent phase, where you start to kind of select what pieces like might be the best match or might offer the most helpful way forward, and then you finally end up with something that isn't an end result, it's a prototype, and that prototype sets you into a put you in a position to then iterate and make that prototype even better.
00:18:37.558 --> 00:18:52.739
I love that in terms of a way of countering complexity, volatility, especially because if you, if you spend a bunch of time and you end up designing something and then everything changes, then you're kind of back to square one.
00:18:52.739 --> 00:19:08.937
But if you spend some time gathering a lot of data, understanding the problem, like coming into it with a really good, solid, human-centered design concept and you're in a position to iterate, then you're a lot more flexible and can kind of go with where the winds might be needing to take you.
00:19:11.361 --> 00:19:38.705
And as you talk about that, jason, I'm hearing a little bit of a paradox in some ways, because we're taking this environment, this situation, this VUCA problem that we're faced with and you may think about it as very disorienting and what you're doing is trying to build in some structure and a process into something that is very unstructured and very lacking of a process.
00:19:40.428 --> 00:19:43.133
Yeah, no, I think that's a really good, it's a really good point.
00:19:43.133 --> 00:20:00.670
And, again, like, from my perspective, that's my like, if that's my approach to trying to create a little bit of something that I can hang my hat on right, just something that might be like a stepping off point into like what's next.
00:20:00.670 --> 00:20:09.981
And you know, I think what I try not to do is I try not to come at it in a way that's rigid, in fact I think you know.
00:20:09.981 --> 00:20:12.634
So, design thinking really great concept.
00:20:12.634 --> 00:20:14.862
If you haven't explored it, there's some good resources out there.
00:20:14.862 --> 00:20:20.594
Ideo is a company that really focuses on human-centered design and design thinking.
00:20:21.940 --> 00:20:41.227
Another book that kind of gets at this concept as well as structure, is a book called Decisive by Chip and Dan Heath and Dan Heath and the reason I'm bringing this up is it's not that you're trying to put in place things that are immovable.
00:20:41.227 --> 00:20:48.031
It's a way of helping to kind of frame your thinking so that you're taking in more information, being a little bit more intentional about where you're going.
00:20:48.031 --> 00:20:51.567
So in that book they describe the WRAP process.
00:20:51.567 --> 00:20:58.769
So that stands for widen your options, reality, test your assumptions, attain distance before deciding and prepare to be wrong.
00:20:58.769 --> 00:21:05.151
And I just I love that in terms of just helping you kind of think through how you might approach like an ambiguous problem.
00:21:06.361 --> 00:21:15.303
Such a fascinating framework and I really appreciate your call out around not being rigid in how you're approaching the problem solving.
00:21:15.303 --> 00:21:18.164
You're treating it in a structured way.
00:21:18.164 --> 00:21:27.793
But you're also not rigid and you talked about the need to iterate as you're going through and implementing a solution and to me that would be a key in a VUCA environment.
00:21:27.793 --> 00:21:33.978
We talk about strategic planning where we have like a year-long plan or a five-year plan, for example.
00:21:33.978 --> 00:21:50.991
Like a year-long plan or a five-year plan, for example, you can't, in a very ambiguous and complex environment, have that five-year plan with the intention of not somehow adapting and evolving that plan as you're getting new information as market conditions change, as your organization changes.
00:21:50.991 --> 00:21:56.274
So I think that's a very important call-out that need to iterate changes.
00:21:56.294 --> 00:21:58.218
So I think that's a very important call out that need to iterate.
00:21:58.218 --> 00:22:02.962
Yeah Well, and I love it.
00:22:02.962 --> 00:22:13.429
I mean, given your background, like I'd be curious like with that, like that five, that 10 year plan, like is that, is there any like I'm being I'm being a little bit of a punk here, but is there any benefit to like thinking out five to 10 years when we're talking about VUCA?
00:22:13.429 --> 00:22:17.726
Or is it like is it tilting at windmills, like what are we doing?
00:22:18.081 --> 00:22:18.834
Yeah, it's fascinating.
00:22:18.834 --> 00:22:24.810
Jason and I could easily make the argument for either side, and this is something I have thought long and deep about.
00:22:24.810 --> 00:22:28.826
One is no, you can't make a 10-year plan because the industry is so.
00:22:28.826 --> 00:22:34.365
There's so many disruptions in the industry that you can't anticipate things that are going to happen 10 years from now.
00:22:34.365 --> 00:22:36.490
So maybe you're just completely wasting your time.
00:22:37.152 --> 00:22:43.025
And where I have landed is, I think it is beneficial to go through that exercise.
00:22:43.025 --> 00:23:01.799
I think it is more the process of thinking into the future of where do you want your organization to be, what are the values, what are your strategies, and anticipating what could emerge in the future, with the recognition that you're not going to capture everything and that has to be a continuous process.
00:23:01.799 --> 00:23:11.049
But this goes back to that idea of sometimes maybe it could be a crutch, Maybe we as an organization could come in and say you know what we're strategic planning?
00:23:11.049 --> 00:23:12.113
We're not going to do that.
00:23:12.113 --> 00:23:15.125
Things are going to change too much and it's just a complete waste of time.
00:23:15.507 --> 00:23:26.503
Now, I suppose there probably are businesses that approach it that way and maybe it depends on your business and your values, and I'm not saying either way is right.
00:23:26.503 --> 00:23:33.426
But I still see the benefit of thinking through some of these decisions and doing some of that planning.
00:23:33.426 --> 00:23:35.451
We talked about this last time with the.
00:23:35.451 --> 00:23:41.260
You know, plan doesn't survive first contact with the enemy, but the other and the last quote I have around planning.
00:23:41.260 --> 00:23:44.028
And I don't know who said this, I'll Google it after I say it.
00:23:44.028 --> 00:23:48.949
I think it was plans are nothing but planning is everything.
00:23:48.949 --> 00:23:57.211
So it's really this idea that the plan is not going to survive and be executed in the way that it was sketched out.
00:23:57.211 --> 00:24:02.553
But that process of thinking through the actions you want to take is very beneficial.
00:24:03.841 --> 00:24:05.745
Yeah, I think that's a really good point.
00:24:05.845 --> 00:24:08.932
And you know you brought up paradox a few times.
00:24:08.932 --> 00:24:19.734
But, like you know, either not thinking strategic, not creating strategic plan, or creating a strategic plan, it's like you know both of those live at different ends of like.
00:24:19.734 --> 00:24:34.649
Uh, you know a polarity there and, like, what polarity theory would tell us is that, well, we probably need to be somewhere in the middle, right, we need to be both flexible and to your point, you know, the benefit of like, thinking about like things in the future, like that, that has its own result.
00:24:34.649 --> 00:24:54.108
And you know, and it's a little bit of like, I think, in the spirit of that convergent, that divergent phase of the process I described, because, like, even though you're not going to be spot on with where you're going to be in 10 years, it's that process of going through those different, diverse perspectives, like, you're probably learning a heck of a lot about.
00:24:54.108 --> 00:25:00.687
Like the options are like, what are the things you're willing to try, what are the things you're not willing to try, and you're better off for it afterwards.
00:25:00.687 --> 00:25:02.046
I loved how you described it.
00:25:03.100 --> 00:25:36.751
Well, a big focus of the leadership development work that we do is having people take bigger and broader perspectives, to look at things from multiple angles, and I think that planning would allow you to do that, and my quick Google search I don't know the accuracy of this suggests that Eisenhower said plans are worthless.
00:25:36.772 --> 00:25:39.515
You look at a good quote and you get a 50% chance.
00:25:39.515 --> 00:25:40.196
It was Einstein.
00:25:40.196 --> 00:25:42.186
I think Eisenhower's up there too.
00:25:42.186 --> 00:25:48.233
Didn't people credit him with coming up with that Covey's Quadrants before Covey took it and rebranded it that?
00:25:50.623 --> 00:25:54.648
So I believe that urgency what is it?
00:25:54.648 --> 00:26:01.336
Urgency, priority, urgency, importance matrix, which is in the book Seven Habits of Highly Effective People.
00:26:01.336 --> 00:26:12.433
I believe it was Eisenhower that first came up with that idea, so when I teach it, I refer to it as the Eisenhower matrix, but I think many people attribute it to Stephen Covey.
00:26:12.433 --> 00:26:23.000
Stephen Covey and I don't know to what extent you talk about people having all of these quotes is are they really saying these things or are we just attributing it to these individuals?
00:26:23.000 --> 00:26:27.451
Because anytime I try and research a quote that I really like, it tends to get so muddy.
00:26:27.451 --> 00:26:29.964
Well, did this person really say it?
00:26:29.964 --> 00:26:32.832
Maybe it was that person and that's not actually what they meant.
00:26:33.746 --> 00:26:54.624
So we'll call it out to eisenhower, but I think it's a very useful idea, regardless of who said it eisenhower had a great way of cooking a steak, which was throwing it right on the coals and if you can get by that being a terrifying prospect of like throwing probably a 20 piece of meat right in the fire produces a good result, does it.
00:26:55.185 --> 00:26:57.051
He didn't die of cancer by any chance, did he?
00:26:57.051 --> 00:26:57.441
Because?
00:26:57.441 --> 00:27:03.371
I feel like that is not like food that can't be safe with all the chemicals, I don't know.
00:27:03.371 --> 00:27:06.931
I think when you char your meat too much that's supposed to be bad for you.
00:27:06.931 --> 00:27:10.748
But that's actually my favorite part of the steak, that little charred piece to it.
00:27:11.229 --> 00:27:12.091
Another paradox.
00:27:12.832 --> 00:27:14.922
Paradox yeah, okay to it.
00:27:14.922 --> 00:27:16.266
Another paradox Paradox yeah, okay.
00:27:16.266 --> 00:27:18.432
So back to VUCA at the individual level.
00:27:18.432 --> 00:27:38.686
The one thing I would emerge, jason, as we're talking about the values, as we're talking about some of the systems thinking, I wanted to bring up the aspect of being adaptable and agile, and the dissertation work that I did was actually on learning agility, which is a very prevalent concept that a lot of people have been talking.
00:27:38.706 --> 00:28:06.846
Defined is that it's taking and learning from your past experiences and applying those lessons, kind of extracting those lessons from that experience and applying it to new and novel situations.
00:28:06.846 --> 00:28:10.101
And that's actually I say that's how I've heard it defined.
00:28:10.101 --> 00:28:17.455
That is Lombardo and Eichinger, I think that actually coined the term learning agility.
00:28:17.455 --> 00:28:21.010
That, I believe, is how they define it back in 2000.
00:28:21.010 --> 00:28:22.586
So it's not that old of a term.
00:28:23.039 --> 00:28:37.265
But if you think about how quickly things are changing and that's part of a VUCA environment, right, that there's so much rapid change how we're doing our jobs right now, for the good majority of us it's going to look a little bit different five years from now.
00:28:37.265 --> 00:28:48.506
If we stop learning right now and just keep doing exactly what we're doing in five years, we're going to be obsolete the information, the knowledge that we have, isn't going to be applicable to the new landscape.
00:28:48.506 --> 00:29:01.832
So wouldn't it be useful to be able to take some lessons from your current experiences and the new situations come along and you're able to take some lessons from your current experiences, and then new situations come along and you're able to take those lessons and kind of extrapolate them to the new environment?
00:29:01.832 --> 00:29:11.711
So those leaders that are able to do that, or individuals, are thought to be learning agile, and I think that's a very important aspect of navigating a VUCA environment.
00:29:13.121 --> 00:29:14.164
No, I never.
00:29:14.164 --> 00:29:19.846
I appreciate the way you described that, because I had never heard learning agility described the way you did.
00:29:19.846 --> 00:29:22.948
It made me think about like it being like it really.
00:29:22.948 --> 00:29:36.831
It's like it's tied to self-awareness and like because you're you're able to take information, experience from the past and then make meaning out of it in a way that you can then use it in the future, and I imagine there's a healthy degree of self-awareness that's created in that.
00:29:37.600 --> 00:29:41.941
Jason, have you been looking at my notes over there, or you've at least read my dissertation, I suppose?
00:29:41.941 --> 00:29:54.729
Because some definitions of learning agility not all, but it's kind of a multidimensional concept and I won't go too deep into it but some measures of learning agility have a self-awareness component in it.
00:29:54.729 --> 00:30:01.164
So that's actually something that's measured as part of some learning agility measures and I think it is very important.
00:30:02.047 --> 00:30:02.649
You're going to hate me.
00:30:02.649 --> 00:30:04.012
I haven't read your dissertation.
00:30:04.012 --> 00:30:04.461
What?
00:30:04.601 --> 00:30:06.567
I'll have to get you a copy in the mail.
00:30:06.567 --> 00:30:09.923
When I get the decoder ring, I'll send the dissertation your way.
00:30:09.923 --> 00:30:14.432
You know I keep like 10 copies on the shelf, just when people ask about it I'm like, oh, you haven't read it.
00:30:14.432 --> 00:30:14.893
Here you go.
00:30:15.273 --> 00:30:16.986
Here you go, and that's a that's a great idea.
00:30:17.100 --> 00:30:19.429
I mean, you wrote it like give it out.
00:30:19.429 --> 00:30:24.068
If nothing else, it can help you fall asleep at night if you're having sleeping troubles.
00:30:25.031 --> 00:30:28.781
It works, so that learning agility.
00:30:28.781 --> 00:30:37.047
It reminded me of one other piece I wanted to bring into this and that's this idea of like, of intentionality.
00:30:37.047 --> 00:30:50.836
So, like you know, when you, when you approach a VUCA environment, a complex challenge, like intentionality with just being able to go at different speeds, you know, and I think like what made that come up is like you know that.
00:30:50.836 --> 00:31:06.400
So that agility piece Right, and what I noticed in leaders and organizations and teams today is that they, they have one gear, it's like gear five or six, and they're always trying to find a higher gear, but like what they lose is so many like other gears in the year box.
00:31:06.400 --> 00:31:12.887
And like to me, you know, if you've got a complex challenge, you like it's it's good to be in low, like it's good to slow down.
00:31:12.887 --> 00:31:30.965
It doesn't mean stop, it doesn't mean like get frozen in place, but I think like being able to downshift from time to time is a really, really powerful tool to be able to pull out in a VUCA environment.
00:31:30.985 --> 00:31:32.807
Yeah, when you said that, have you ever heard the saying?
00:31:32.807 --> 00:31:36.113
Maybe you have slow is smooth, smooth is fast.
00:31:36.553 --> 00:31:37.555
Yes, I have.
00:31:45.200 --> 00:31:45.279
Yeah.
00:31:45.279 --> 00:31:46.084
So when I hear that I think about that.
00:31:46.084 --> 00:31:55.688
You want to move at an intentional pace to where things are actually you're making the correct decision, things are flowing smoothly, and to however quickly you can make things flow smoothly, then that's really as fast as you're going to be able to go.
00:31:55.688 --> 00:32:27.820
In that situation I was having a conversation with a leader just I think it was last week, and we were talking about the benefits, or I was harping on the benefits of reflection for learning that if you're going and as an adult, the way we learn is not necessarily just from experience, but we have to take that experience, we have to reflect on it, we have to challenge our assumptions, we have to think about different approaches and in that process of reflecting on experience, then we can learn from our experiences.
00:32:27.820 --> 00:32:38.594
So I was really harping on this need to be reflective and the leader kind of pulled me to the side and said, yeah, brandon, you know all this is great and I completely agree with it, but the reality is you don't know my job.
00:32:38.594 --> 00:32:48.932
There is no space to reflect, to take that step back, to pause and think about doing things differently and guide it, guide it.
00:32:48.932 --> 00:33:03.701
And I understand that and I think a lot of leaders would think that way, and the paradox is that until you're able to take that moment to reflect and think about it, you're not going to be able to be as effective and efficient as you could be.
00:33:03.701 --> 00:33:10.006
So it's through that reflection, through moving slower, that you're actually able to do it more efficiently.
00:33:10.046 --> 00:33:15.843
And I liken it to the analogy of sharpening the saw, and I'm sure you've heard this before.
00:33:15.843 --> 00:33:23.751
But my neighbor, he's over here, he's clearing out some land, and I'm looking out my office window and I see him and he's over there like sawing away.
00:33:23.751 --> 00:33:26.526
And look back an hour later and what do you know?
00:33:26.526 --> 00:33:29.132
He's still working on the same tree, trying to cut it down.
00:33:29.132 --> 00:33:32.711
So I pop over to the neighbor's house and I say, hey, what's going on?
00:33:32.711 --> 00:33:33.341
What are you doing?
00:33:33.341 --> 00:33:34.604
Yeah, clearing some land.
00:33:34.604 --> 00:33:37.009
Got to get all this clear by the end of the day today.
00:33:37.009 --> 00:33:40.844
And I'm like well, you've been working on the same tree for quite a while.
00:33:41.305 --> 00:33:49.614
Have you thought that maybe you should go sharpen your saw so that you could actually move a little bit faster in cutting the trees down?
00:33:49.614 --> 00:33:52.101
No, no, don't have time to sharpen the saw.
00:33:52.101 --> 00:33:53.465
I got to get this done.
00:33:53.465 --> 00:34:02.414
So the paradox is you take that time to sharpen the saw, to reflect, to think about how you're showing up.
00:34:02.414 --> 00:34:05.584
In action You'll actually be more effective and efficient.
00:34:05.584 --> 00:34:08.681
But most leaders would say, nope, don't have time to stop and do that.
00:34:08.681 --> 00:34:10.003
I got to get this thing done.
00:34:10.987 --> 00:34:12.632
He didn't just say like get off my property.
00:34:14.061 --> 00:34:16.809
He said why are you just watching me out of your window?
00:34:16.809 --> 00:34:19.407
Why don't you get a saw and help me out here?
00:34:19.407 --> 00:34:23.067
No, he didn't, and you know probably he was agitated at that point.
00:34:23.067 --> 00:34:27.429
He had a saw in his hand, so it may not have been best to like approach him and critique his work.
00:34:27.429 --> 00:34:30.924
Yeah, you know, and I may have shouted it from across the street.
00:34:30.924 --> 00:34:33.188
I'm not even sure I went into a Jordan.
00:34:33.188 --> 00:34:34.851
Sharpen yourself.
00:34:34.851 --> 00:34:36.775
Yeah exactly.
00:34:40.380 --> 00:34:46.726
Yeah, I think in that in there's that word paradox again and I think that's such an important word when it comes to VUCA is that you're often going to have these paradoxes where it's like you've got to slow down to eventually go faster.
00:34:47.107 --> 00:35:23.826
You know I think we talked about this in a previous episode but this concept of like balcony and dance floor right, like people get stuck down on the dance floor doing the dance and they're dancing like crazy down there, but like sometimes, if you pop up to the balcony, you can see what's going on and then you're able to kind of you know, notice like, oh man, like you know, like there's all these other dynamics that are going on in the dance floor that I had no idea about, and then you can go back down to the dance floor and like do the dance better, um, so that's that, that's a the, the.
00:35:23.846 --> 00:35:24.147
You know, the um.
00:35:24.147 --> 00:35:27.637
You know one concept I find helpful with vuka and it you know, all it takes is like being able to pop up to the balcony from time to time to make a point of the also.
00:35:27.637 --> 00:35:29.123
But what you just said is like reflection.
00:35:29.123 --> 00:35:35.355
Right, reflection doesn't mean, you know, taking a week off and going and sitting on a mountain somewhere it can be 10 minutes.
00:35:35.355 --> 00:35:36.286
I'm doing it wrong off and going and sitting on a mountain somewhere.
00:35:36.286 --> 00:35:36.481
It can be 10 minutes.
00:35:36.501 --> 00:35:37.665
I'm doing it wrong, Jason.
00:35:37.665 --> 00:35:41.136
I was just on the mountain earlier today.
00:35:41.136 --> 00:35:46.215
Why didn't anyone tell me that I could just reflect right here at my desk and take like five minutes?
00:35:46.777 --> 00:35:50.608
Yeah, well, now you know and definitely still go to the mountain.
00:35:50.608 --> 00:36:06.990
But I mean like, really, like you know, five minutes, 10 minutes, get up, change your scenery, go outside, walk around a little bit, like think what you think about, what you need to think about, come back in and I guarantee there is a freshened perspective.
00:36:07.010 --> 00:36:17.197
I can get five minutes and just walk around the neighborhood and think about it, or maybe even on some of my phone calls, walk and talk.
00:36:17.197 --> 00:36:20.602
I think changing your scenery is so important.
00:36:20.602 --> 00:36:24.336
Maybe not going up a mountain, but just walking around the neighborhood will suffice.
00:36:25.038 --> 00:36:26.683
Yeah, and if you get to the mountain, even better.
00:36:27.264 --> 00:36:27.906
Even better.
00:36:27.906 --> 00:36:29.831
Yeah, excellent, so any more.
00:36:29.831 --> 00:36:37.309
I think we've hit quite a few tips at the individual level and I know we've spent quite a few tips at the individual level and I know we've spent quite a bit of time on that kind of looking at the clock.
00:36:37.309 --> 00:36:47.681
Do we want to talk, maybe some team stuff, for a few moments before we wrap Anything else at the individual level, you'd recommend no, I think that did it.
00:36:47.701 --> 00:36:51.507
I would say that I think a lot of what we talked about is applicable at the team level too.
00:36:51.507 --> 00:37:01.969
Especially if you're working with a facilitator or something like that, or if you're just the manager of the team and you want to bring a little bit more awareness into the team.
00:37:01.969 --> 00:37:03.945
It probably helps with the dynamics as well.
00:37:04.647 --> 00:37:14.289
Great call out, jason, because when you think about your values, that can certainly be done at the individual level, but you can talk about your team values, using that as a North Star, with self-awareness.
00:37:14.289 --> 00:37:19.368
Wouldn't it be good to know not just your individual strengths and weaknesses, but that of your team?
00:37:19.368 --> 00:37:31.746
I think a lot of times, as it relates to our own developmental journeys, we focus a lot on developing our weaknesses, but I like to encourage people to partner with other people.
00:37:31.746 --> 00:37:36.417
Look, if you're more action-oriented and not as good at strategic thinking, then a good balance is to partner with other people.
00:37:36.417 --> 00:37:47.520
Look, if you're more action-oriented and not as good at strategic thinking, then a good balance is to partner with someone who is a strategic thinker and you're very action-oriented, and you two can balance each other out, although drive each other crazy at times.
00:37:47.520 --> 00:37:49.402
So that's a possibility.
00:37:49.844 --> 00:38:04.086
Thinking about agility, that can certainly be done at the team level, and something I would like to pull out as it relates to teams is thinking about what is your team culture like, what is the environment that you're building?
00:38:04.086 --> 00:38:08.859
And, jason, I'll ask you this, as I often ask many people that I talk to culture about.
00:38:08.859 --> 00:38:19.913
I feel like it's a term we throw out quite a bit, but how would you define culture if you think about a team or an organization um like to me?
00:38:19.973 --> 00:38:30.471
it's all the like, unspoken norms, like all the stuff that, like you know, I've heard it described as like the water that you're swimming in, right, and like, just like the like, the like.
00:38:30.471 --> 00:38:34.080
The fish doesn't think about the water right, but like it's experiencing it all around.
00:38:34.161 --> 00:38:38.924
That's how I think about it love that and I think certainly book answer.
00:38:38.924 --> 00:38:48.719
Like the unspoken norms, values, the history of an organization, the water that you're swimming in Sometimes we talk about like clean fish, dirty water.
00:38:48.719 --> 00:38:56.338
If you have really effective individuals in your organization but your culture is not so great, then they're not going to flourish.
00:38:56.338 --> 00:39:01.141
Sometimes I think about it just as the way we do things here, as an easy way to think about culture.
00:39:01.141 --> 00:39:04.396
It is the way we do things in an organization and a team.
00:39:04.396 --> 00:39:08.873
Here is the opportunity that I would call out in a VUCA environment.
00:39:09.616 --> 00:39:27.654
I have found and feel free to challenge me on this, jason, because I feel like it's a very military way of thinking, but I think the most effective, engaged, successful teams are those teams who have been through some type of adversity together and thinking about VUCA.
00:39:27.654 --> 00:39:30.682
It is an adversarial environment.
00:39:30.682 --> 00:39:32.697
There's a lot of volatility, uncertainty.
00:39:32.697 --> 00:39:34.869
It is not an easy environment to operate.
00:39:34.869 --> 00:39:46.376
So the opportunity here is if you can take a team and have them navigate VUCA successfully, whatever that situation looks like, and they emerge on the other end of that.
00:39:46.376 --> 00:40:01.869
I think it's actually going to make for a more cohesive and engaged team and you have to be very intentional with your team how you establish that culture, the norms and how you look at navigating that scenario.
00:40:01.869 --> 00:40:03.789
And I think about psychological safety.
00:40:03.789 --> 00:40:13.250
That would be the one I would call out as look, if you're in a VUCA environment, if you're trying to be adaptable, you're iterating, you're doing your systems thinking.
00:40:13.250 --> 00:40:16.299
You really have to set an environment that is psychologically safe.
00:40:18.550 --> 00:40:19.471
I wouldn't challenge you.
00:40:19.471 --> 00:40:38.750
I love that you've linked the two, like culture and then adversity, because I think, like you know, if I think about my experience as a people manager, I've led teams that really thrived in adversity and like had that kind of like bonding that came together.
00:40:38.750 --> 00:40:46.817
And I've led other teams that really struggled and like probably others that would have disintegrated if they faced too much adversity.
00:40:47.619 --> 00:40:57.125
And if you had to think about the difference between those two things teams what is it that you think helps those teams emerge and navigate that adversity, versus those teams that fall apart?
00:40:57.125 --> 00:41:02.609
If you were to say psychological safety, since that's what I'm advocating for, that would be like bonus points to you, jason.
00:41:03.371 --> 00:41:06.981
I was trying to figure out anything I could say other than psychological safety.
00:41:06.981 --> 00:41:27.539
But no, I mean, I do think, like, I think, if you're going to have this discussion, like trust, psychological safety, like there's some sense of like, there's some sense of rapport, of belonging of you know that like, I mean, like you've got each other's back and I think that that's all, like that's only possible when psychological safety is there.
00:41:28.481 --> 00:41:34.915
Yeah, and let's just define psychological safety for a moment for those of our listeners who may not be as familiar.
00:41:34.915 --> 00:41:47.860
It is creating an environment and a culture where team members feel safe to take risks, voice their opinions and maybe make mistakes without fear of being punished for those mistakes.
00:41:47.860 --> 00:41:55.202
And the idea actually emerged from I won't say emerged, I'll say was popularized by Amy Edmondson.
00:41:55.202 --> 00:41:57.596
She wrote a book called Fearless Organizations.
00:41:57.596 --> 00:41:58.418
It's really great.
00:41:58.418 --> 00:42:10.822
I think she probably has some TED Talks and some podcasts herself where she talks through psychological safety and it really being the differentiator and if you think about yourself on a team, you think about a team that's going through an uncertain situation.
00:42:10.822 --> 00:42:31.434
There is no clear answer for this to feel like they're able to voice their opinions, to contribute, to take risks, to maybe fail, and that they're not going to be punished for doing those things, for moving in the right direction.
00:42:31.474 --> 00:42:35.623
And to me, that is something that is so very important to navigating VUCA.
00:42:35.623 --> 00:42:43.698
You can have all of those individual attributes and I think they're all necessary, but when you bring people together, you really have to have the culture.
00:42:43.698 --> 00:42:51.740
Something you and I would have talked about is the idea that a person's behavior is really a function of that person and their environment.
00:42:51.740 --> 00:43:00.815
So we can take all those personal attributes, but we also have to build the right environment, and I think that was BF Skinner who came up with that, or was that Kurt Lewin?
00:43:00.815 --> 00:43:02.317
It's one of the two.
00:43:02.317 --> 00:43:03.799
I'll Google it.
00:43:03.799 --> 00:43:05.301
I'm fact checking myself as we go.
00:43:05.942 --> 00:43:06.583
I'm going to go with.
00:43:06.603 --> 00:43:07.003
Lewin though.
00:43:13.371 --> 00:43:26.596
While you're Googling, I'll just piggyback on something you said Failure happens in VUCA, right, there's no way to not fail in VUCA or to use structure or intentionality or self-awareness or strategy to avoid it, like it's going to be there.
00:43:26.596 --> 00:43:37.096
So you know, creating a culture where people aren't punished for it and where people learn from it, like where they use a little bit of reflection, like that's absolutely critical.
00:43:37.096 --> 00:43:40.911
So I just wanted to make that point because I think it is a really good one.
00:43:41.751 --> 00:43:53.089
Yeah, and if you think about any major accomplishment, there are bumps, bruises, failures along the way, especially if you're thinking about iterating that there's going to be some unforeseen circumstance.
00:43:53.089 --> 00:44:19.511
So really making sure that you're able to continue to push forward despite that failure and adversity and as I Googled, it actually was it's Kurt Lewin that said it and it looks like it goes back to the 30s maybe but a pretty popular idea in social psychology that it's not just we focus on the person a lot of times and how they're behaving, but making sure that we're recognizing the influence that the environment has on them as well.
00:44:19.511 --> 00:44:24.102
And as leaders, what's very important about this is that leaders set the environment.
00:44:24.102 --> 00:44:33.135
If you think about your role as a leader of a team, of an organization, how are you leading and setting the environment where people are able to flourish?
00:44:34.873 --> 00:44:40.299
Yeah, I heard there's a saying I don't know who said it, but leaders create the weather.
00:44:40.299 --> 00:44:43.390
So, like what kind of weather do you want to create on your team?
00:44:43.390 --> 00:44:45.215
Is it dark and stormy all the time?
00:44:45.215 --> 00:44:50.916
Is it overcast and gloomy, or, like, are we looking for some, like you know, bluebird sunny days here?
00:44:51.658 --> 00:44:59.422
Yeah, love that, and I think I saw on LinkedIn a picture of like a leader, like holding an umbrella over their team, and that's what I really liked.
00:44:59.422 --> 00:45:17.543
It's, to some extent, we have to shelter our team members from some of the chaos and VUCA that is occurring in the organization and thinking about how you can deliver that message to them and not increase or create confusion or amplify it.
00:45:18.289 --> 00:45:19.797
Yeah, yeah, really great point.
00:45:21.089 --> 00:45:22.714
All right, I feel like I're.
00:45:22.714 --> 00:45:32.762
I could talk about this for the rest of the day, and we've also committed to keeping these episodes around 45 minutes, so I think we're getting close to the end of this episode.
00:45:32.762 --> 00:45:36.274
What else should we mention here before we close it out, jason?
00:45:36.757 --> 00:45:42.778
Well, I know you had you had some um like bigger picture thoughts on on organizations and systems.
00:45:42.778 --> 00:45:45.378
Was there anything that you didn't get to that you wanted to share?
00:45:46.230 --> 00:45:47.794
Yeah, just briefly.
00:45:47.794 --> 00:45:49.359
Thanks for the reminder.
00:45:49.359 --> 00:45:50.915
We won't spend too much time here.
00:45:50.915 --> 00:45:53.889
Maybe it'll be a topic for a future episode.
00:45:53.889 --> 00:46:01.129
But as we're thinking about how to approach problems, something I would love for our listeners to start thinking about is taking broader perspectives.
00:46:01.129 --> 00:46:08.953
Back to your idea of getting up on the balcony as you're progressing through the organization leadership, you have to move beyond the individual level.
00:46:08.953 --> 00:46:13.434
You have to even move beyond the team level at times and think about broader as an organization.
00:46:13.434 --> 00:46:16.431
What is the environment and culture that you're trying to create?
00:46:16.771 --> 00:46:38.145
And as I was thinking about VUCA and organizations that can navigate it successfully, as I was thinking about VUCA and organizations that can navigate it successfully, the idea of a learning organization popped up to me and the importance of an organization making iteration, learning improvement, part of their strategy and gaining a competitive advantage through that.
00:46:38.145 --> 00:46:44.329
And my advisor for my dissertation she actually wrote a lot on learning organizations.
00:46:44.329 --> 00:46:52.417
Her name's Karen Watkins, so if you have any interest in checking out her work, she did some work with Victoria Marsik, who's out of Columbia.
00:46:52.417 --> 00:46:56.012
They really looked at learning as a strategic advantage.
00:46:56.012 --> 00:47:10.132
They had a measure it's called the DLOQ Dimensions of Learning Organization Questionnaire that you can take, thinking about your organization and think about to what extent is a learning embedded into the strategy of your organization.
00:47:10.132 --> 00:47:12.475
Back to this idea of strategic planning.
00:47:12.475 --> 00:47:26.961
If you're being strategic in how you're approaching the future, if you're able to embed learning adaptability into that, I think it would serve you very well as a organization in our current times.
00:47:29.132 --> 00:47:42.399
And I love that you brought in the learning organization concept and I mean, you know to me like you're thinking about different ways of thinking about how people learn, right Like 70, 20, 10, right, 90% of it supposedly happens on the job.
00:47:42.399 --> 00:47:57.382
So, like to me, being a learning organization is being really intentional about noticing the learning moments that are around you and like you can then take it down to a team level and say, like well, is your culture kind of like ready for that Like, is it like being intentional about like noticing the learning?
00:47:57.382 --> 00:48:03.702
Or, if you're a leader, if you're a manager, are you helping people connect to the learning that's around them?
00:48:03.702 --> 00:48:07.759
Because to me, that's a big part of like I mean like for to be a learner.
00:48:07.759 --> 00:48:09.102
You got to notice the learning.
00:48:10.531 --> 00:48:12.889
Yeah, and so much of learning is social.
00:48:12.889 --> 00:48:15.378
So I appreciate that you're talking about connecting it.
00:48:15.378 --> 00:48:31.961
And that 70-20-10 for those listeners that aren't familiar is the idea that 70 percent of our learning comes from experience, 20 percent comes from learning from others, and I think it's meant to think about like coaching and mentoring and then only 10% of our learning comes from formal classroom experience.
00:48:31.961 --> 00:48:35.457
Now here's what I love to say about like models and theories such as that.
00:48:35.457 --> 00:48:36.861
All models are wrong.
00:48:36.861 --> 00:48:37.991
Some models are useful.
00:48:37.991 --> 00:48:39.996
Is it that exact percentage?
00:48:39.996 --> 00:48:40.717
Of course not.
00:48:40.717 --> 00:48:42.161
Does it differ by individual?
00:48:42.161 --> 00:48:49.855
Of course it does, but the big takeaway is we can only learn so much in the classroom, and especially when we're thinking about how rapidly things are moving.
00:48:49.855 --> 00:48:55.317
You go get a degree and as soon as you graduate, what you've learned is already obsolete to some extent.
00:48:55.317 --> 00:49:06.250
So you have to continue to learn from your experiences, to grow, to adapt and develop, and it is really the key to flourishing in this VUCA environment.
00:49:07.734 --> 00:49:08.576
Great call out.
00:49:08.656 --> 00:49:36.614
I may have got my percentages wrong there, but the spirit of it was right, yeah, and what's fascinating tangent here is 70-20-10 is very popular, but if you were to go back to the people that those percentages are originally attributed to, they say that that is not at all what they were trying to say with that original quote Back to our idea that quotes are sometimes nonsense, but I still think it is a very useful way to think about how we learn.
00:49:36.653 --> 00:49:39.540
to bucket it, to think about learning from experience.
00:49:39.540 --> 00:49:51.619
I find that it is very important, but there are key ways to do it to make sure that you're continuing to learn and grow, because sometimes when we think about experience, we think about the number of years somebody's been doing something.
00:49:51.619 --> 00:49:55.719
Like I have 30 years of, you know, working in the leadership development space.
00:49:55.719 --> 00:50:02.018
And, at the risk of being brash, what I always say is look, just because you have experience in doing something doesn't mean you can do it well.
00:50:02.018 --> 00:50:09.335
If I have 20 years experience being a complete idiot in my job, then that doesn't mean that I'm going to be successful in the job.
00:50:10.337 --> 00:50:13.394
Yeah yeah, I've got like 40 years experience trying to fold fitted sheets.
00:50:13.394 --> 00:50:14.297
I still can't do it.
00:50:15.682 --> 00:50:16.444
Fair, fair.
00:50:16.444 --> 00:50:18.771
I don't know that I could do any better there.
00:50:18.771 --> 00:50:22.701
Jason, of course I have less experience since you are the elder Smith.
00:50:24.110 --> 00:50:27.056
Yes, yeah, you're well, but clearly that didn't make any difference.
00:50:28.250 --> 00:50:30.699
Not in this scenario, but okay, great.
00:50:30.699 --> 00:50:33.669
I feel like this has been a fabulous conversation.
00:50:33.669 --> 00:50:43.538
For those of our listeners who would love to reach out to us, we just remind you you could find us at our email address boundlesscuriosityatoutlookcom.
00:50:43.538 --> 00:50:44.792
Shoot us a note.
00:50:44.792 --> 00:50:49.992
We'd love to hear your ideas, suggestions and really appreciate that we have this time together.
00:50:49.992 --> 00:50:55.212
Jason, I'm looking forward to connecting again in a few weeks, yeah it was good seeing you today.
00:50:55.212 --> 00:50:56.478
All right, thanks a lot.
00:50:56.478 --> 00:50:57.462
All right, bye.