Beyond Solutions: Designing Technology Around People with Dr. David Adepoju

WEBVTT
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:09.599
When I listen to some motivational speakers that talk about people should save more and invest more, my question is, what do you save and invest?
00:00:09.919 --> 00:00:16.800
So I think the very foundation of that conversation should be what skills do you have that will generate more income for you?
00:00:17.039 --> 00:00:27.039
We have a lot of young people today building things uh that the end users are not aware they are building, or the end users are not eventually going to need it.
00:00:27.120 --> 00:00:32.240
So it's possible for you to discover the problem and you jump the understanding to building the solution.
00:00:32.479 --> 00:00:34.880
If you jump it, you're still going to run into issues.
00:00:35.280 --> 00:00:42.000
So discover it, understand it, create it, and then um you know test it out or implement it.
00:00:42.240 --> 00:00:50.560
Social media has legitimized emptiness, you know, and it does it has also amplified performative impact.
00:00:50.880 --> 00:00:54.479
But the truth is that social media has come to stay.
00:00:54.560 --> 00:00:54.880
Yes.
00:00:55.039 --> 00:01:01.520
It is the closest medium of communication and connection in the society today.
00:01:01.679 --> 00:01:02.320
Yeah.
00:01:02.560 --> 00:01:07.519
We need to find a way for people who are actually doing the work to also use those mediums, right?
00:01:08.319 --> 00:01:14.239
Yes, you would say they are busy, they don't have time to talk about what they are doing, but there is power in storytelling.
00:01:14.480 --> 00:01:14.719
Dr.
00:01:14.799 --> 00:01:23.760
David Adepoju is a tech policy researcher, innovation leader, and one of Africa's leading voices on the relationship between technology and society.
00:01:24.159 --> 00:01:40.239
As a managing partner at Citi Hub and the head of the Citi Hub Design Lab, he leads initiatives exploring how design, technology, and policy can address some of the continent's most complex challenges, spending governance, public services, healthcare, and economic development.
00:01:40.400 --> 00:01:55.840
His journey has taken him from the University of Ibadong to South Korea and New Zealand through research and innovation ecosystems across Africa and into classrooms at the African Leadership University, where he helped mentor a new generation of African innovators and entrepreneurs.
00:01:56.000 --> 00:01:59.280
At the center of his work is a simple but urgent question.
00:01:59.519 --> 00:02:03.840
How can Africa harness emerging technologies on its own terms?
00:02:04.079 --> 00:02:14.800
Through research, entrepreneurship, and public policy, David continues to explore what it takes to build a future that is both technologically advanced and yet still deeply human.
00:02:15.039 --> 00:02:17.360
This is Beyond Visible with Dr.
00:02:17.520 --> 00:02:18.159
David.
00:02:18.960 --> 00:02:20.319
Thank you, David, for coming in.
00:02:20.560 --> 00:02:21.280
That's my pleasure.
00:02:21.919 --> 00:02:22.400
Thank you.
00:02:22.960 --> 00:02:25.439
I just want to know like what are you busy with right now?
00:02:25.599 --> 00:02:30.719
Because you're always busy with every single time I've you know reached out to you or had a conversation.
00:02:30.800 --> 00:02:32.080
There's always something in the works.
00:02:32.159 --> 00:02:34.800
So I just want to know, like, what are you very busy with right now?
00:02:35.120 --> 00:02:44.800
Um a lot of um innovation partnership work uh for the communities that we serve, right?
00:02:44.879 --> 00:02:45.280
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:02:45.439 --> 00:02:48.479
And also a lot of uh business development.
00:02:48.800 --> 00:02:53.039
So when you reach out to me and I'm busy, that's what I'm kind of busy doing these days.
00:02:53.280 --> 00:02:54.479
Okay, that's nice.
00:02:54.719 --> 00:03:14.319
Um and some people know you through academia, some other people know you through the impact work that you're doing, and some people also know you for the I think beyond the work you do for the CC Hub, the work that you've done in Nigeria, and also the work you've done in blockchain, there's so much that you've been a part of.
00:03:14.719 --> 00:03:27.439
Um so I I think it brings it brings the question like was it intentional for you to move through this to through all of this, uh, or was this something you just happened and then you saw an opportunity and jumped into it?
00:03:27.759 --> 00:03:30.879
I think there's a thread across all the things I've done.
00:03:31.039 --> 00:03:45.919
Uh, from when I was doing technology advocacy in Nigeria via Tech Mid Africa to um my university professor role, to um, you know, working in practical innovation and technology ecosystem.
00:03:46.159 --> 00:03:48.560
The thread is uh thought leadership.
00:03:49.120 --> 00:03:50.960
Um somebody that really loves knowledge.
00:03:51.039 --> 00:04:04.800
And when you look at all the work I've done, it's either using the power of evidence and insight to drive an agenda or to advocate for something or to share um some form of knowledge with the community.
00:04:05.039 --> 00:04:08.560
So the thread across all I've done is uh thought leadership.
00:04:08.639 --> 00:04:09.039
Yes, yes.
00:04:09.280 --> 00:04:14.400
Uh and it's not um a case of jumping from one opportunity to the next opportunity.
00:04:14.800 --> 00:04:20.879
I think it's uh when you look at innovation generally, there's a knowledge economy and the market economy.
00:04:21.040 --> 00:04:26.879
And I think I've I've been able to play on both sides from the knowledge economy to the market economy.
00:04:27.040 --> 00:04:27.199
Okay.
00:04:27.680 --> 00:04:31.600
Thought leadership is the foundation or the thread that connects all that I've done.
00:04:31.839 --> 00:04:32.240
I see.
00:04:32.399 --> 00:04:32.560
Yeah.
00:04:32.800 --> 00:04:35.199
So now like we know the basis of it.
00:04:35.519 --> 00:04:45.120
I just want to talk about your time because uh our first encounter was when you were a facilitator at ALU and you became like the head of department at some point.
00:04:45.519 --> 00:04:50.319
And from there you transitioned to to working in in impact today.
00:04:50.639 --> 00:05:01.759
I just want to uh just maybe get a little insight on what your biggest takeaways were uh from the time you went to academia and how that has informed the rest of the work you're doing at the moment.
00:05:02.000 --> 00:05:05.279
Yeah, so uh it's to connect to what I said before top leadership.
00:05:05.360 --> 00:05:07.279
When I was in the academia, I was teaching research.
00:05:07.519 --> 00:05:08.160
Yes, yes, yes.
00:05:08.399 --> 00:05:10.319
You remember very I was teaching research.
00:05:10.480 --> 00:05:15.120
I was also doing a lot of research ethics work at African Leadership University, right?
00:05:15.199 --> 00:05:20.560
Yeah also supporting students in their ventures and supervising capstones.
00:05:20.720 --> 00:05:20.959
Yeah.
00:05:21.120 --> 00:05:27.759
Um, and when I transitioned out of uh the academia, I joined CC of as head of research.
00:05:27.920 --> 00:05:28.160
Okay.
00:05:28.319 --> 00:05:29.759
So you can see the thread, yeah, right?
00:05:30.160 --> 00:05:40.560
Um, so research is um very dear to me, and the way we've done research in the academia sometimes makes people feel research should be hard or research should be boring, right?
00:05:40.720 --> 00:05:42.079
Which I don't believe it is.
00:05:42.319 --> 00:05:49.040
It is the uh the ability to uh bring out evidence, you know, and the what we live today.
00:05:49.199 --> 00:05:51.040
I'm a critical problem solver.
00:05:51.279 --> 00:05:54.160
If you ask me to do something, I'll ask you to go bring data.
00:05:54.319 --> 00:05:54.639
Yes.
00:05:54.800 --> 00:05:58.240
Because if you don't bring data, we don't we are not sure of what we are doing.
00:05:58.639 --> 00:06:09.920
We can't we don't have evidence to back it up, which means we might lose investment, we might waste time, and we might waste a lot of resources because we are riding on uh on assumption for what we want to do.
00:06:10.240 --> 00:06:21.600
So for me, I think um the transition, uh the some of the takeaways um is that in the academia, maybe my the culmination of my work will go into a journal article.
00:06:21.759 --> 00:06:22.480
Yes, right?
00:06:22.720 --> 00:06:39.040
And outside of the practical knowledge I share with students in the class, but in um in the impact and social impact space, I can see the, I can almost see the immediate um you know outcome of what I'm working on immediately.
00:06:39.120 --> 00:06:39.199
Yeah.
00:06:39.360 --> 00:06:52.720
So if I'm sharing an evidence for something, for a programmatic expression, for um maybe an agenda setting for an investment, the evidence I'm sharing is being used almost immediately.
00:06:52.800 --> 00:07:09.600
And I can see in less than six months, yeah, the work of evidence I've done is being used and it's you know resulting into program disruption, to uh setting up uh uh an investment agenda, or it's helping us set up a whole new process in the innovation space.
00:07:09.759 --> 00:07:14.800
So those are the takeaways in terms of the difference between what I used to do in the academia and what I do now.
00:07:15.040 --> 00:07:23.279
In the academia, there's a medium where the combination of my work goes to, and you need extra effort for you to go maybe find it out.
00:07:23.439 --> 00:07:29.519
Yeah, but today um I'm able to share it with the practical innovation ecosystem and they can use it almost immediately.
00:07:29.759 --> 00:07:30.000
Okay.
00:07:30.399 --> 00:07:43.199
And I know that some of the work the CC Hub does is is usually helping organizations, probably mostly the ones uh at a much bigger scale to use research to to drive that innovation.
00:07:43.680 --> 00:07:51.519
And coming from research and uh now in this full-scale impact, you you manage the design lab in in Kigali.
00:07:51.920 --> 00:07:53.519
Just Kigali or also in Nairobi?
00:07:53.920 --> 00:07:55.040
So I'm a managing partner.
00:07:55.279 --> 00:07:59.120
My portfolio uh covers um beyond Kigali.
00:07:59.279 --> 00:08:01.839
So the design lab is just one of the portfolios.
00:08:02.240 --> 00:08:02.879
Portfolio work, okay.
00:08:03.279 --> 00:08:10.639
So and I think CC Hub is responsible for a lot of you know um research work and also a lot of innovation that's been uh driven through the continent.
00:08:10.800 --> 00:08:10.879
Yeah.
00:08:11.040 --> 00:08:32.960
I want to I want to see, I wanna like if you could talk, speak to like uh how your background and research informs the way you think about innovation, especially in technology, with the work that you guys do and the startups that you work with and the you know communities that you work with, how what what what are you taking from your time in research and how is that you know influencing what you do?
00:08:33.360 --> 00:08:37.360
Yeah, one of my professors used to say something that I still use to today.
00:08:37.519 --> 00:08:43.519
Um, he usually says, we are not students of definition, but we're rather students of problems.
00:08:43.759 --> 00:08:44.080
Okay.
00:08:44.559 --> 00:08:51.120
Um, if we limit uh things to just the definition of them, we might not appreciate the depth of those things.
00:08:51.200 --> 00:08:51.440
Yeah.
00:08:51.679 --> 00:09:00.799
But if we see things or we observe our world or our environment as a place where there are so many things that are broken that we need to fix, then we'll become students of problems.
00:09:00.960 --> 00:09:01.120
Okay.
00:09:01.279 --> 00:09:06.240
And then when we become students of problems, we're going to become students of research.
00:09:06.399 --> 00:09:06.639
Okay.
00:09:06.799 --> 00:09:10.240
When we become students of research, we're going to become students of outcomes.
00:09:10.399 --> 00:09:10.639
Okay.
00:09:10.799 --> 00:09:11.039
Right.
00:09:11.360 --> 00:09:15.120
Um, and outcomes, you know, will be driven by evidence, right?
00:09:15.279 --> 00:09:25.679
So um the work that we do at CCOB all over the continent, the underlying um, you know, framework is human-centered design.
00:09:25.840 --> 00:09:26.240
Yes.
00:09:26.480 --> 00:09:36.879
We have a lot of young people today building things uh that the end users are not aware they are building, or the end users are not eventually going to need it, right?
00:09:37.440 --> 00:09:46.960
So imagine you're building an uh an agrictech solution, you've attended a conference, they've mentioned all kinds of problems that farmers face on the continent.
00:09:47.279 --> 00:09:52.960
And you are technologically excited and you have the skills to code a solution, a technological solution.
00:09:53.120 --> 00:10:02.000
And you go back to your room in Lake in Lagos and you code it out, and then you've built the solution for a problem you've not validated, right?
00:10:02.080 --> 00:10:03.679
Somebody has just told you about a problem.
00:10:03.919 --> 00:10:07.919
You've not gonna validate it yourself, you've not gonna speak to farmers.
00:10:08.240 --> 00:10:24.639
Or you know, and when you talk about challenges in different sectors, when you mention a challenge, there are subdomains of those uh of that particular challenge that if you dig deeper, you might just solve for a subdomain rather than do an umbrella um you know solution, right?
00:10:24.720 --> 00:10:24.960
Yeah.
00:10:25.200 --> 00:10:30.240
So the work that we do, the underlying uh like framework is human centered design.
00:10:30.320 --> 00:10:36.000
Yes, which means you need to discover, first of all, what the problem is, you need to understand what the problem is.
00:10:36.080 --> 00:10:38.480
You know you can discover a problem, but you don't understand the problem.
00:10:38.559 --> 00:10:38.720
Yes.
00:10:38.879 --> 00:10:43.919
So it's possible for you to discover the problem and you jump the understanding to building the solution.
00:10:44.320 --> 00:10:46.559
If you jump it, you are still going to run into issues.
00:10:46.639 --> 00:10:46.799
Yeah.
00:10:47.039 --> 00:10:53.759
So discover it, understand it, create it, and then um, you know, test it out or implement it.
00:10:53.919 --> 00:10:55.279
That's supposed to be the flow.
00:10:55.440 --> 00:11:07.919
And that is why in all the incubation programs, uh, acceleration programs, venture studio, capacity building programs uh that we do everything, you know, points back to human-centered design.
00:11:08.080 --> 00:11:17.519
The people who are supposed to use those things uh must be engaged, they must validate it, and you must align it with their um you know ambitions.
00:11:17.759 --> 00:11:26.720
If not, you are going to waste resources, yeah, you're going to waste everybody's time, and you're going to um labor somewhat in vain if you if you don't do that.
00:11:26.879 --> 00:11:31.120
So, and that is what we mean by evidence and research at CCOP.
00:11:31.200 --> 00:11:36.559
It's not just about doing literature review or you know, citing what has already been already been done.
00:11:36.720 --> 00:11:38.720
Yeah, we want to do problem statements.
00:11:38.879 --> 00:11:44.720
You have told us what the issues are, but we want to actually do the research to understand, to articulate our own problem statement.
00:11:44.879 --> 00:11:45.039
Yes.
00:11:45.440 --> 00:11:51.200
Once we have our problem statement, it's easier for those who are going to solve the problem to know the angle they are solving from.
00:11:51.600 --> 00:11:55.039
But if we are too generic and there are problems everywhere, believe me.
00:11:55.120 --> 00:11:59.679
There are if you want to solve um two problems per day, you'll find them, right?
00:11:59.840 --> 00:12:00.159
Yeah, yeah.
00:12:00.320 --> 00:12:03.759
But are you solving the right problem or are you solving the problem right?
00:12:03.919 --> 00:12:04.320
Yes, yes.
00:12:04.559 --> 00:12:06.000
You know, they are two different things.
00:12:06.080 --> 00:12:06.240
Okay.
00:12:06.480 --> 00:12:18.480
So it's very important for you to have to be able to articulate your problem statement, have the evidence that the problem exists, and understand what has been done about that problem before so that you are not reinventing the wheel.
00:12:18.559 --> 00:12:18.720
Yeah.
00:12:18.879 --> 00:12:31.039
And then you must also engage either you call them users, customers, end users, or last mile people that will engage your product, yeah, for you to invite them into sprint and carry them along, right?
00:12:31.360 --> 00:12:43.600
And that is the foundation of what we mean by social impact and building technologies uh for um the use of the society in such a way that it leads to economic prosperity.
00:12:44.000 --> 00:12:49.039
Because if without economic prosperity, what you are doing in innovation is just a waste.
00:12:49.279 --> 00:12:50.639
Because when people are hungry, they don't care.
00:12:50.960 --> 00:12:57.519
And also, I think I'm glad that you've taken time to explain it because you can assess the foundation for the majority of what we're going to talk about today.
00:12:57.600 --> 00:12:57.759
Yeah.
00:12:58.000 --> 00:13:01.600
And obviously, everybody at CC Hub understands what you're saying.
00:13:01.759 --> 00:13:06.159
And when you interact with your colleagues or people in the same space, they get what you're you're talking about.
00:13:06.399 --> 00:13:09.039
When you zoom it out to the larger society, right?
00:13:09.279 --> 00:13:11.440
What are what is the thing that you've seen?
00:13:11.600 --> 00:13:14.799
Because usually you said some problems we can identify them.
00:13:15.039 --> 00:13:17.039
This is usually what most politicians do.
00:13:17.120 --> 00:13:18.960
They can identify, but we can't really understand.
00:13:19.120 --> 00:13:24.399
When you see people like Trump, you know, tell you that they can fix very big problems overnight.
00:13:24.639 --> 00:13:29.519
And now you start to question like, does it is he really, does he really know what he's talking about?
00:13:29.679 --> 00:13:29.840
Right.
00:13:30.080 --> 00:13:36.879
So I want to kind of hear from your perspective what are some misconceptions, problem solvers in a larger societal context.
00:13:37.200 --> 00:13:49.039
Uh, people who are actually in positions of power who make decisions that affect you and I, what do you think that they're getting wrong about approaching problems and you know, also kind of in the way that they're approaching the solutions?
00:13:49.120 --> 00:13:50.720
Like what are they getting wrong?
00:13:51.279 --> 00:13:59.519
When I when I speak to innovators or people in our community about problem solving, I usually say we have three types of problem solvers.
00:14:00.240 --> 00:14:08.639
We have the intuitive problem solvers, those are the people that um you know they use their intuition to solve problems.
00:14:09.200 --> 00:14:13.919
They are the set of people that would say, I did this like this two years ago, it worked.
00:14:14.080 --> 00:14:17.120
So this present situation should also be the same.
00:14:17.519 --> 00:14:19.360
Uh they are borderline spiritual.
00:14:19.519 --> 00:14:24.240
They, you know, you know, they just I just know that I know that this is what I'm supposed to do.
00:14:24.559 --> 00:14:32.960
Uh it doesn't mean that it works all the time for them, but they've um experienced, used, apply their intuition over and over again, and it seems to have worked for them.
00:14:33.360 --> 00:14:36.000
So those those are the first classification of people.
00:14:36.879 --> 00:14:41.039
Second classification are the um inconsistent problem solvers.
00:14:41.279 --> 00:14:45.279
They are the ones that they have option A, B, C, D, to Z.
00:14:45.519 --> 00:14:48.240
If something does not work now, they move on to the next alternative.
00:14:48.399 --> 00:14:50.399
If B doesn't work, they move on to C.
00:14:50.639 --> 00:14:58.639
They are the set of people that deal with artbreak uh very easily, uh, you know, because they can easily move on to the next thing that is happening.
00:14:58.799 --> 00:15:02.559
Uh for them, uh, they don't all their eggs are not in one basket.
00:15:03.120 --> 00:15:04.879
Um, they'll approach it this way.
00:15:04.960 --> 00:15:06.240
If it doesn't work, they switch.
00:15:06.399 --> 00:15:07.519
If it doesn't work, they switch.
00:15:07.600 --> 00:15:10.080
They are the sometimes you call them serial entrepreneurs.
00:15:10.240 --> 00:15:10.399
Okay.
00:15:10.559 --> 00:15:26.320
Uh, they've solved the problem in education, it doesn't work, they move to healthcare, you know, uh, which doesn't mean sometimes it's the good way to go, but they've by the mastery of the type of problem solver they are, you know, they will by the time they get to maybe option F, they will eat the nail on the head eventually, right?
00:15:26.399 --> 00:15:28.080
They will stumble on that thing eventually.
00:15:28.399 --> 00:15:31.519
And the third classification are the critical problem solvers.
00:15:31.919 --> 00:15:39.360
These are the people that um you have talk to them about what the problem is, but you must bring data to convince them.
00:15:39.840 --> 00:15:43.200
You know, they will not make any move until they are super sure.
00:15:43.279 --> 00:15:45.120
They are the people that ask you for blueprints.
00:15:45.679 --> 00:15:47.279
Um, how are you thinking about it?
00:15:47.360 --> 00:15:48.320
What is the end goal?
00:15:48.399 --> 00:15:50.000
They they question everything, right?
00:15:50.320 --> 00:15:53.039
Uh, they don't take things at face value, right?
00:15:53.200 --> 00:15:56.639
And I think I have I share a little bit of that as a problem solver.
00:15:56.720 --> 00:15:59.440
You can be one or both or the three at the same time.
00:15:59.600 --> 00:16:11.919
Yeah, so when you look at the world uh in those three buckets of type of problem solvers, the um intuitive problem solvers will talk big game when it comes to a problem, you know.
00:16:12.159 --> 00:16:22.639
Um you know, the intuitive problem solvers will talk big game because they by their intuition, they have the confidence that I've done it like this before in business.
00:16:22.720 --> 00:16:24.320
Yeah, I can do it like this in politics.
00:16:24.480 --> 00:16:24.799
Exactly.
00:16:24.960 --> 00:16:27.600
Or I've done it like this in politics, I want to do it like this in business.
00:16:29.279 --> 00:16:40.480
Yeah, so you know, and it doesn't work like that, it doesn't, and that's why um when you look at the three buckets, the intuitive problem solver seems to fail more compared to the other two, right?
00:16:40.559 --> 00:16:45.360
Yeah, and these are very established frameworks, so people have different names for these three buckets I've just described.
00:16:45.840 --> 00:17:04.400
Yeah, so um, and that describes what you're saying around somebody that's you know, maybe politicians, or you're making a campaign to be the um the next position holder for a constituency, and you want to, and you've and you we are very good in Africa with problem articulation.
00:17:04.480 --> 00:17:06.480
Yeah, we know how to articulate problems.
00:17:06.559 --> 00:17:07.200
I give it to us.
00:17:07.359 --> 00:17:13.519
If you attend our seminars, our workshops, yeah, the title alone already articulates what the problem is.
00:17:14.000 --> 00:17:19.200
But the issue is that we're coming out of those conversations with as many solutions as possible, right?
00:17:19.279 --> 00:17:31.119
So uh so intuitive problem solvers are the people that have the like the top level confidence to say they can solve a problem that should take 10 years to solve in six months, right?
00:17:31.519 --> 00:17:35.680
It is by the mastery of their intuition, which is not always the truth sometimes.
00:17:36.160 --> 00:17:47.759
Um, the inconsistent problem solvers, they um they are the set of people that will you know um on the promise, but they can eventually overdeliver, right?
00:17:47.920 --> 00:17:53.759
Because they understand the boundaries of what they want to do, that it's not impossible that it will fail.
00:17:54.000 --> 00:17:56.559
It's not also impossible that it will work, right?
00:17:56.799 --> 00:18:06.240
So they um they know the boundaries of um problem solving and they also acknowledge the weaknesses that comes with trying to solve a problem.
00:18:06.400 --> 00:18:08.160
Yeah, it's it happens in business.
00:18:08.319 --> 00:18:13.279
You've you know even thought about a model that this is the model that will work and it wouldn't work.
00:18:13.359 --> 00:18:17.200
And the one that you are just trying to try out is the one that will blow out, right?
00:18:17.519 --> 00:18:19.359
So it happens from time to time, right?
00:18:19.519 --> 00:18:34.000
So I would say problem solving in the society uh is deter is um determined by the type of problem solver that you are, the record of successes you've recorded in the past trying to solve a number of problems.
00:18:34.160 --> 00:18:39.759
Yeah, um they would say experience is the best teacher, but experience can also aspire.
00:18:39.920 --> 00:18:42.079
Yeah, you know, I've never read that.
00:18:42.480 --> 00:18:44.160
Yeah, yeah, and experience can expire.
00:18:44.400 --> 00:18:47.839
But then you've you've already mastered the the problems that could come up.
00:18:47.920 --> 00:18:49.200
Like how would that ever leave you?
00:18:49.440 --> 00:19:00.559
So if you were so let's imagine that you were uh an area photographer, you get on the on the chopper on the plane to take pictures, right?
00:19:01.200 --> 00:19:03.440
Now we have drones.
00:19:03.519 --> 00:19:23.039
Yeah, you have experience and mastery of sitting on the edge of a chopper to take good photographs, but you can you no longer but that experience when you are flying a drone, it's almost immaterial because now you are more or less like standing on the ground and you know shooting that device into the air now.
00:19:23.359 --> 00:19:25.759
So you're not carrying that big camera and looking down.
00:19:25.920 --> 00:19:27.359
Now you are here looking up.
00:19:27.519 --> 00:19:27.759
Okay.
00:19:27.920 --> 00:19:29.359
So that experience is expired.
00:19:29.680 --> 00:19:35.680
Even though it's um there's a it's the same process or the same outcome.
00:19:35.839 --> 00:19:38.799
You want to capture images and footage, right?
00:19:38.960 --> 00:19:43.359
But the truth is that that experience of sitting on the chopper has expired for you.
00:19:43.440 --> 00:19:52.079
So if you think you can fly a drone because you used to sit on the chopper without learning how to fly a drone, you always have to obviously reinvent yourself.
00:19:52.160 --> 00:19:52.319
Right.
00:19:52.400 --> 00:19:52.559
Yeah.
00:19:52.799 --> 00:20:01.200
And the reason why I also believe some experience can expire is that the rate at which technology is evolving is geometric now.
00:20:01.279 --> 00:20:08.960
Uh and that's why, you know, maybe yesterday me and uh maybe we were having a conversation on what we need to do about AI in the next 48 hours.
00:20:09.200 --> 00:20:15.119
And we wake up in the next 48 hours and there's a new announcement, there's a new model, there's a better and the creators are not helping.
00:20:15.359 --> 00:20:15.519
Yeah.
00:20:15.680 --> 00:20:19.039
So at the end of the day, experience can expire.
00:20:19.200 --> 00:20:19.440
Okay.
00:20:19.599 --> 00:20:21.359
Uh, some experience can expire.
00:20:21.599 --> 00:20:23.519
It's the first time I've heard that, but it's really interesting.
00:20:23.839 --> 00:20:30.079
And and just on that, I wanted I've always wanted to ask um a human-centered designer this question.
00:20:30.720 --> 00:20:39.039
Most of the uh the reservation people have about going via the human-centered design process is how slow it can be sometimes.
00:20:39.279 --> 00:20:43.359
Because you start off trying to understand, you could it could take you yeah like months, yeah.
00:20:43.920 --> 00:20:49.440
And sometimes you can even start implementing and realize that you actually poorly define the problem, and then you go back.
00:20:49.680 --> 00:20:51.279
It's not like a straightforward process.
00:20:51.519 --> 00:20:55.759
You just it's it's like you can come back from the end to the beginning, sure.
00:20:56.000 --> 00:21:07.359
But then when you look at companies like Google, um, you know, or companies like Meta who are able to solve problems at a scale at a very large scale and at this at a fast rate as well.
00:21:07.519 --> 00:21:13.039
And most times those solutions are very intuitive, and like you you wonder like, how do you do this for a billion people?
00:21:13.359 --> 00:21:20.960
I've always wanted to wonder like, what do what do they know that those of those of us who just have a suffrage level of problem solving do not know?
00:21:21.359 --> 00:21:24.240
And which helps them actually do these things at scale.
00:21:24.400 --> 00:21:29.680
Also for countries who figured out uh a way to tackle like big, big problems like hunger and all of that.
00:21:29.759 --> 00:21:33.440
What do they know about solving problems quickly that we don't know?
00:21:33.519 --> 00:21:34.720
I kind of think you have the answer.
00:21:34.799 --> 00:21:36.160
They are sitting on a lot of data.
00:21:36.319 --> 00:21:37.440
Okay, also it's data.
00:21:37.680 --> 00:21:43.839
So if I want to solve a problem uh in Kigale, for example, yeah, I need to go on the field to collect that data.
00:21:43.920 --> 00:21:45.519
I need to have the conversations with people.
00:21:45.759 --> 00:21:46.000
Okay.
00:21:46.240 --> 00:21:46.559
Right?
00:21:46.720 --> 00:21:51.680
Uh, but big techs, you use more than maybe five products that they already have.
00:21:51.839 --> 00:21:52.079
Okay.
00:21:52.559 --> 00:21:59.759
Um, on your phone, on your computer, or even you are you interact with a particular web page that belongs to them and you.
00:22:00.240 --> 00:22:03.759
Interact and you know have access to the service and/or a product.
00:22:04.240 --> 00:22:10.799
The truth is that the rate at which they can innovate or the speed at which they can innovate will be different from me.
00:22:10.880 --> 00:22:18.000
That I'm just in Kigali trying to solve a problem for maybe traffic, or I want to solve a problem for dairy farmers, for example.
00:22:18.240 --> 00:22:19.440
I need to go speak to people.
00:22:19.599 --> 00:22:22.640
I don't have dairy farmers using a product I already have.
00:22:23.119 --> 00:22:24.960
But Google wants to solve a problem.
00:22:25.279 --> 00:22:26.160
They already have data.
00:22:26.319 --> 00:22:47.200
And you, you know, when you have data, you know, you are sitting on a gem that you can make a new product decision in less than 10 minutes, just looking at a dashboard, or just looking at a behavioral pattern, or just looking at um, you know, some form of um financial behavior data.
00:22:47.599 --> 00:23:03.119
You know, so if I want to ship a new product to a particular location, I literally have data as a big tech of people from that region, how they spend money to purchase a product, or maybe they purchase, they usually subscribe to the cheapest classification of our product.
00:23:03.200 --> 00:23:07.680
So I know what when I'm building a new product for them, I need to optimize for that.
00:23:08.079 --> 00:23:15.759
So when you have all that, that's why it feels like the product they are launching seems like it's very intuitive and they are not doing analysis paralysis, right?
00:23:15.920 --> 00:23:19.839
Where you are just analyzing and analyzing because they are sitting on a lot of data.
00:23:19.920 --> 00:23:20.240
I see.
00:23:20.319 --> 00:23:22.640
And you can launch new products when you have data, right?
00:23:22.720 --> 00:23:24.240
So I think that's the difference, you know.
00:23:24.319 --> 00:23:24.480
All right.
00:23:24.559 --> 00:23:28.960
So human-centered design um does not necessarily waste time.
00:23:29.119 --> 00:23:29.440
Okay.
00:23:30.160 --> 00:23:35.759
Um, because even the one of the mindsets of human-centered design is iterate as quickly as possible.
00:23:36.480 --> 00:23:36.640
Yeah.
00:23:36.799 --> 00:23:39.279
You know, iterate as quickly as possible.
00:23:39.440 --> 00:23:41.839
If you need to change something, change it as quickly as possible.
00:23:41.920 --> 00:23:49.519
Because in the current digital economy, it's not about um how novel your idea is, it's about how fast and quick you can implement it.
00:23:50.400 --> 00:23:55.279
And that's why when somebody comes to you now, they want to share the idea with you and they're giving you an NDA.
00:23:55.440 --> 00:24:00.319
I don't think you know, because that's when you are thinking about there are more than two million people thinking about the same.
00:24:00.880 --> 00:24:10.640
And they're also like, and everybody's looking for the implementation energy or the support or the um ecosystem that they can quickly work with to launch that product or to work on that idea.
00:24:10.880 --> 00:24:21.279
So uh HCD, um, one of the mindset is be quick as uh as you know, as you be as quick as possible when you want to iterate.
00:24:21.519 --> 00:24:35.039
But I agree with you that sometimes you've articulated the problem, you know, you can articulate the problem properly and you get on the field to solve the problem, but new societal changes affect the problem that you need to go back as well.
00:24:35.200 --> 00:24:42.880
And that's why uh in human-centered design, there's also the opportunity of yeah, um, ethical pivot quickly as as much as possible.
00:24:43.039 --> 00:24:46.640
Yeah, but you need all the uh information to be correct, yeah.
00:24:46.880 --> 00:24:53.759
And even though you are uh you know pivoting quickly, you still need to get the your foundational brief correctly.
00:24:54.079 --> 00:24:57.839
Do you do you does the City Hub actually consult with governments?
00:24:58.000 --> 00:24:59.440
Like, do you provide your services?
00:24:59.599 --> 00:25:06.799
Like let's say if they wanted to solve something in health or like hunger or um I don't know, sexual reproduction.
00:25:06.880 --> 00:25:09.920
Yeah, do you do you consult uh with government institutions or that?
00:25:10.240 --> 00:25:10.799
Yes, yes.
00:25:10.880 --> 00:25:13.359
Um, so yeah, government and private.
00:25:13.519 --> 00:25:20.160
Yeah, because evidence it needs to be applied at all um at all the stages of innovation, right?
00:25:20.400 --> 00:25:26.160
Uh so when you think and at CCOB, we focus on three main sectors education, healthcare, and the creative industry.
00:25:26.319 --> 00:25:27.039
Yes, right?
00:25:27.279 --> 00:25:36.160
And we have other levers like uh technology and society, where we do a lot of digital security and civic resilience um you know work as well.
00:25:36.319 --> 00:25:53.599
Uh we have frontier technologies, the application of artificial intelligence to um you know the sectors in which we work, and also our artificial intelligence can deliver um very unique solutions to societal issues, like things that are broken in the society across board, right?
00:25:53.680 --> 00:26:23.039
Yeah, so HCD is something we offer uh as either we help you think through uh your problem, yeah, whether you're private or government, where we sit down with the stakeholders, um, either through a quadruple elixir or triple elixir approach where we bring the industry, government, and the academia together, or we bring um government, industry, academia, and the end users also together, you know, because it's super important for sometimes to have the end users in the room with the other stakeholders.
00:26:23.119 --> 00:26:24.319
Yeah, so we do that.
00:26:24.480 --> 00:26:42.799
Um, so it's either you commission us to do it as a research, yeah, or we sit down with you to help you think through it, maybe to with your leadership team or the any level of your organization that you want us to work with, or you have a community in mind, we go to that community to do that engagement.
00:26:42.880 --> 00:26:50.640
Okay, or you want uh maybe your uh senior leaders to be more human-centered in their decision making.
00:26:51.039 --> 00:27:02.640
We go through, you know, it's whether you want it for two weeks or three weeks or six weeks, we go through the framework one by one for you to really understand how to we want you to be a default, we don't want it to be ad knowledge.
00:27:02.960 --> 00:27:10.799
We want you to, by the end of the session, you're going to have a default position about thinking about problems and thinking about people first.
00:27:10.960 --> 00:27:13.920
Yes, yes, people putting people at the center of whatever you're being.
00:27:14.559 --> 00:27:19.759
Technology is an enabler and it enables something for a particular sect of people.
00:27:19.920 --> 00:27:20.079
Yeah.
00:27:20.160 --> 00:27:22.559
So when you think about it that way, you won't build in limbo.
00:27:22.880 --> 00:27:23.200
For sure.
00:27:23.359 --> 00:27:23.440
Yeah.
00:27:23.599 --> 00:27:33.599
And I think for me, the reason I'm very curious about that is because I actually did a little um, I don't know, I don't I don't want to call this study because it was very intentional.
00:27:33.759 --> 00:27:35.039
Um, I'm problem solving.
00:27:35.119 --> 00:27:38.720
And I actually realized that there are actually problems that don't have solutions, right?
00:27:38.960 --> 00:27:42.720
And like they it feels like the more you solve it, the more you create more problems.
00:27:42.960 --> 00:27:47.279
And that feels like is the it's the kind of problems that these institutions solve.
00:27:47.680 --> 00:27:53.920
But every now and then we hear people come out and they pitch about like how they can take away these things completely, right?
00:27:54.160 --> 00:28:00.960
And as somebody who is intersected with this, like is there like what is the way forward in situations like that?
00:28:01.119 --> 00:28:02.400
I'll use, for example, traffic.
00:28:02.480 --> 00:28:09.039
If you look at traffic in Kigali, right, you would think that because there are very few roads, that's why like there's traffic.
00:28:09.200 --> 00:28:16.319
And in Nigeria, most times they construct more roads and then more people go and buy cars and then start using the roads, and you actually increase the traffic.
00:28:16.400 --> 00:28:16.559
Yeah.
00:28:16.799 --> 00:28:26.799
And then for somebody who is clueless, which is in most cases the people who actually make those decisions in in a place like Nigeria, how would you approach a problem like that?
00:28:27.039 --> 00:28:50.799
How would you you know attempt at even you know figuring out something as complex as let's say um tribalism in in Nigeria, where like people have seen their own get you know murdered by someone from a different tribe and it's kind of like uh you know corrupted the way they think, or like an issue like poverty, where if you give people money, they give it back to rich people by buying stuff.
00:28:51.200 --> 00:28:52.319
So is it very complex?
00:28:52.400 --> 00:28:56.240
Like, how would you advise somebody with a decision maker to think through things like that?
00:28:56.559 --> 00:28:59.680
I don't think we should take some problems at face value.
00:28:59.839 --> 00:29:00.160
Okay.
00:29:00.480 --> 00:29:11.440
The types of problems you are describing are hydra-headed problems where if you you know approach it from here, you are you are creating it's breaking out on the other side.
00:29:11.680 --> 00:29:12.319
Yes, yes.
00:29:12.480 --> 00:29:26.000
Um, and in design thinking, where you do tree analysis, so you have the root, you have the um the body of the tree, yeah, you have the stem, you have the cover of the tree as well.
00:29:26.160 --> 00:29:36.160
Yeah, sometimes when we look at when we look at complex problems, when you look at complex problems that we've been trying to solve for a long time and we are not able to solve them, go and look deeply.
00:29:36.400 --> 00:29:38.319
We are treating the symptoms, not the cost.
00:29:38.720 --> 00:29:39.759
Not the root cost.
00:29:40.000 --> 00:29:40.480
Yeah, yeah.
00:29:40.880 --> 00:29:51.119
I don't believe for every, and that's why maybe it's I but about Einstein that said we we can't use the same mindset we uh we used when creating the problem to solve the problem.
00:29:51.599 --> 00:29:55.519
You need to think 10 years more when you're solving the problem that you created, you know.
00:29:55.599 --> 00:30:02.000
So the and also the bandwidth of your design thinking, you know, needs to be better than when the problems were created, right?
00:30:02.319 --> 00:30:08.400
And the truth is that for every um solution you create, it's create a problem for somebody somewhere.
00:30:08.799 --> 00:30:10.400
And and that's how it is, right?
00:30:10.799 --> 00:30:18.480
But the truth is that every problem has a root, every problem has a stem, yeah, and every problem has the leaves.
00:30:18.799 --> 00:30:20.880
It depends on where you are attacking it from.
00:30:21.119 --> 00:30:34.559
And sometimes it's very, in fact, when you attack some problems from the um from the stem, people will appreciate you that you're even at least trying to take a stab at that problem.
00:30:34.960 --> 00:30:41.440
But the truth is that in some situations we we don't need to run away from attacking the root.
00:30:41.599 --> 00:30:47.200
Yeah, if we don't attack the root, that problem we're just going to be using our hand to rub the head, it's not going anywhere.
00:30:47.279 --> 00:31:01.039
Yeah, we're going to do um a lot of interventional um work, we're going to do press releases, we're going to do a lot of podcasts, we're going to do a lot of media recording that we are trying to solve the problem.
00:31:01.119 --> 00:31:01.279
Yeah.
00:31:01.440 --> 00:31:04.720
But some problems need the for you to look at it from the root.
00:31:04.799 --> 00:31:04.960
Yeah.
00:31:05.119 --> 00:31:06.480
Traffic, for example.
00:31:06.640 --> 00:31:08.559
Um, I'll take Kigali, for example.
00:31:08.640 --> 00:31:10.000
We're beginning to have more traffic.
00:31:10.319 --> 00:31:16.000
And it's uh, and I was looking at why do we are having more traffic in Kigali compared to like five years ago.
00:31:16.160 --> 00:31:27.680
Uh, but the truth is that uh data is showing the number of cars that we have added in Kigali in the last five years, running up to like 800,000 vehicles in the last five years, in this Kigali, right?
00:31:28.000 --> 00:31:35.039
And and that that explains why we're having and the roads, you know, the topography of the city, you know, we don't have a lot of highways, right?
00:31:35.200 --> 00:31:46.720
So we still manage the same roads that we have and vehicles, people, but you can also look at the middle class as getting more um comfortable, which means people can buy afford more cars.
00:31:46.799 --> 00:32:03.279
So when you're investing in economic prosperity, you're creating you are you're creating because with economic prosperity, people cannot afford more cars, people can afford, you know, um to build houses, yeah, people can afford a lot of things for vehicles.
00:32:03.519 --> 00:32:09.920
When you were thinking of economic prosperity, maybe you were not thinking about roads that you know your roads will have pressure, right?
00:32:10.319 --> 00:32:17.440
So now economic prosperity has created pressure to widen the roads or to look for alternative transport systems, yeah.
00:32:17.599 --> 00:32:25.519
And that's why you see uh there are bus lanes, there are, you know, but the truth is that for every solution, there will be a problem.
00:32:26.559 --> 00:32:32.960
But you must be um intentional about once you know the root cause of a problem, you can always solve it easily, right?
00:32:33.039 --> 00:32:46.400
Okay, so when we um look at uh you made some examples around how people make decisions about maybe other people who don't speak their language or they're not from the same place as them.
00:32:46.960 --> 00:32:59.839
And um, when they want to make comments about such things, they don't think about the fact that for anybody to come out to express their, you know, maybe their pain about a particular thing, they are speaking from experience.
00:33:00.000 --> 00:33:02.799
They are not just taking it from the anger and just talking about it.
00:33:03.039 --> 00:33:10.079
So when you yeah, when you want to address such issues, it has to be a deep dialogue from okay, where is that your reaction coming from?
00:33:10.240 --> 00:33:16.960
And you're not when you use reaction to react to a reaction, you're most likely going to cause more problem.
00:33:17.359 --> 00:33:26.319
But when you take a dialogue approach to uh respond to a reaction that seems to be vehement or very bitter, you might understand the context of people.
00:33:26.400 --> 00:33:34.240
Yeah, and the truth is that everybody has a context, and that is why sometimes people say, My truth, my truth.
00:33:34.400 --> 00:33:37.519
There are we have your truth, but there are also universal truths, right?
00:33:38.400 --> 00:33:43.599
And the universal truth is that you cannot solve a problem addressing the stem.
00:33:43.839 --> 00:33:45.839
You need to solve the problem addressing the root.
00:33:46.240 --> 00:33:47.200
Okay, cool.
00:33:47.519 --> 00:33:55.920
All right, I think just by hearing the word human-centered design, it means that the the systems around it can be applied to the self.
00:33:56.079 --> 00:33:58.480
Yeah, and that's rarely the conversation.
00:33:58.640 --> 00:34:03.200
Whenever we think about HCD, we're thinking about like a broader like institutional problem.
00:34:03.359 --> 00:34:06.720
Yeah, so let's let's just imagine that I want to become rich, right?
00:34:06.799 --> 00:34:08.079
And that's a problem that I have.
00:34:08.159 --> 00:34:13.440
Yeah, um, how can I apply human-centered human-centered design to design my way to work?
00:34:13.519 --> 00:34:15.679
And this is going to help so many people, basically.
00:34:16.239 --> 00:34:19.519
If you can crack this, I call it living by design.
00:34:19.599 --> 00:34:22.800
Yes, yes, and it also means living intentionally, yeah, right.
00:34:22.960 --> 00:34:28.000
So if you if your passion is to become let us use the word rich, maybe financially free.
00:34:29.039 --> 00:34:38.719
For example, yes, the human-centered design application to your situation will be uh, first of all, your intentional documentation of your financial priorities.
00:34:39.440 --> 00:34:43.360
So if you want to be financially free, what are you what do you spend on?
00:34:43.440 --> 00:34:43.760
Yeah.
00:34:44.000 --> 00:34:48.559
That uh at the end of the month or at the end of the year, they are most likely immaterial.
00:34:48.800 --> 00:34:50.639
They don't add anything to your life.
00:34:51.039 --> 00:34:56.079
Uh, it's not as if you even paid, uh, spend those money for your comfort necessarily.
00:34:56.320 --> 00:35:01.360
It's just a form of money dire that you have that doesn't add to your to the future you desire.
00:35:01.679 --> 00:35:05.440
So intentional tracking of what are my financial priorities, right?
00:35:05.519 --> 00:35:06.639
What am I spending on?
00:35:06.880 --> 00:35:16.239
Number two, um when when I listen to some motivational speakers that talk about people should save more and invest more.
00:35:16.559 --> 00:35:19.440
My question is, what do you save and invest?
00:35:19.760 --> 00:35:26.559
So I think the very foundation of that conversation should be what skills do you have that will generate more income for you?
00:35:26.800 --> 00:35:27.280
Yes, yes.
00:35:27.599 --> 00:35:27.840
Right?
00:35:28.000 --> 00:35:33.119
Because if you say people should save and invest, and people are gassed up, eventually they'll come to you.
00:35:33.199 --> 00:35:35.199
But I don't have not making anything.
00:35:35.760 --> 00:35:39.199
So the foundation of that conversation should be make money first, right?
00:35:39.840 --> 00:35:48.960
It is when you have made money, no matter how small, that we can start talking about put something aside, invest uh something out of a percentage out of what you've made, right?
00:35:49.039 --> 00:36:04.079
Yeah, so that's another human sense, just telling yourself the truth that when you are in a room where they are saying save, invest, you don't have a business, um, first of all, to take down yeah, your business should be tell yourself the truth.
00:36:04.239 --> 00:36:05.119
What is my truth?
00:36:05.280 --> 00:36:08.000
I need to find income, first of all.
00:36:08.239 --> 00:36:09.840
And how do I find income?
00:36:10.000 --> 00:36:13.440
Do I need to go brush up my skills and something?
00:36:13.920 --> 00:36:15.599
Do I need to go learn something?
00:36:15.760 --> 00:36:23.119
Do I need to go and do an apprenticeship somewhere to, you know, or do I need to pivot the industry I am to another industry?
00:36:23.360 --> 00:36:27.039
That's human-centered design, telling yourself the truth, right?
00:36:27.199 --> 00:36:31.360
Uh, you know, first of all, before you take the externalities, right?
00:36:31.440 --> 00:36:34.880
If you want to be rich or if you want to be financially free.
00:36:35.119 --> 00:36:38.639
Number three thing would be with that same example.
00:36:38.800 --> 00:36:43.599
Um, what are you um what are you investing in?
00:36:43.760 --> 00:36:46.639
Are you investing in yourself or you are investing in things?
00:36:46.719 --> 00:36:48.400
You're supposed to invest in the two things, right?
00:36:48.639 --> 00:36:50.320
Invest in yourself and invest in things.
00:36:50.480 --> 00:36:53.599
But when you invest in yourself, it is the biggest form of investment.
00:36:53.760 --> 00:36:54.000
Yes.
00:36:54.159 --> 00:36:58.639
Which means you stay relevant across times and seasons, right?
00:36:59.039 --> 00:37:04.000
Uh, which means if uh people usually say technology will take your job.
00:37:04.159 --> 00:37:13.599
And I usually say, yes, we can see examples of technology uh taking people's jobs, but technology is also changing people's roles at the end of the day.
00:37:13.679 --> 00:37:15.679
Yeah, because you need to reinvent yourself, yeah.
00:37:15.840 --> 00:37:25.199
And you can see in the global layoffs uh that happened in recent times in the last five months, you can count up to 100,000 people laid off from big techs.
00:37:25.280 --> 00:37:37.679
Yeah um, a percentage, a percentage of that UI UX designers, a percentage of that UI uh user experience researchers, percentage of that uh software marketing people.
00:37:37.920 --> 00:37:39.280
I actually think they target marketing.
00:37:39.519 --> 00:37:41.599
Yeah, and UX, UX researchers.
00:37:41.679 --> 00:37:48.800
I saw a lot of UX researchers being laid off, and that tells you that there's a change happening in that industry because of artificial intelligence.
00:37:48.960 --> 00:37:49.519
Yes, yes.
00:37:49.760 --> 00:37:54.400
And those people, one way or the other, they will still work in tech and reinvent themselves.
00:37:54.559 --> 00:38:04.000
Yeah, so AI might have led to them losing a job as a UX researcher, but it can become something else within the same industry, right?
00:38:04.400 --> 00:38:16.639
So I would say human-centered design in in terms of personal application is telling yourself the truth, first of all, of your uh boundaries, your limitations, and your current situation.
00:38:16.800 --> 00:38:20.480
Yeah, if you don't understand where you are, you will not know where you're going.
00:38:20.559 --> 00:38:21.679
Okay, and that's the truth.
00:38:21.840 --> 00:38:26.559
So um don't buy, don't spend money on unnecessary things.
00:38:26.800 --> 00:38:30.800
Um, you know, and many people don't try and impress anybody.
00:38:30.960 --> 00:38:40.800
Um because the truth is that once you've um acquired on something, in 24 hours of acquiring that thing, it has lost maybe 50% of its value and appeal to you.
00:38:40.880 --> 00:38:58.719
Yeah, and your next ambition is you're you are in your corolla that you appreciated, you know, and you did thanksgiving for being able to afford it until you meet a friend who have who has just bought a G-Wagon, and your and your Corolla or your Camry becomes uh irrelevant to you.
00:38:58.800 --> 00:39:03.599
Yeah, but the truth is that 24 hours ago, yeah, that Corolla was everything to you.
00:39:03.679 --> 00:39:13.920
Yeah, you know, so just that's telling yourself the truth of um this is my problem, this is what caused the problem.
00:39:14.079 --> 00:39:20.400
Yes, yes, these are the options to solve the problem, and this is most effective one for me.
00:39:20.480 --> 00:39:23.760
Yeah, and I'm giving myself a time frame to get out of this situation.
00:39:23.920 --> 00:39:26.559
That's the one center design for personal application.
00:39:26.880 --> 00:39:27.199
Okay.
00:39:27.519 --> 00:39:29.760
That's something I think is very actionable in my opinion.
00:39:30.079 --> 00:39:31.039
Something anybody can take.
00:39:31.440 --> 00:39:34.400
Let's just talk a little bit about your journey, uh transitioning.
00:39:34.480 --> 00:39:39.280
Because usually when people get uh into a new road, they get celebrated a lot.
00:39:39.599 --> 00:39:45.199
And you've you've recently completed the PhD while you were working, which is crazy, uh, by the way.
00:39:45.360 --> 00:39:54.880
Yeah, and uh you and you've actually moved from being the head of research to becoming the the managing partner at CC Hub in uh design lab.
00:39:55.360 --> 00:40:09.039
But what people need people generally are very excited to hear those things, but they don't usually see the trade-offs, like in terms of especially as somebody who's been on the field, like actually getting your hands dirty with this research and also with the body of knowledge you've acquired.
00:40:09.360 --> 00:40:23.360
What are some of the you know psychological shifts and trade-offs that you've had to like, you know, uh like you've had to, you know, get uh in terms of in order to shift to this role of management um and no longer like you know being on the field?
00:40:24.719 --> 00:40:40.639
Well, um, I would say for anybody, first of all, without you know arrogating anything to myself, I would say uh in any uh role or in any opportunity you've been given, try to prove yourself to be much more.
00:40:41.679 --> 00:40:42.719
If you get what I mean.
00:40:43.039 --> 00:40:45.599
Uh so we've seen we are giving you an opportunity.
00:40:45.920 --> 00:40:47.519
We might not have seen what you've done before.
00:40:47.599 --> 00:40:49.199
You've only showed us your CV.
00:40:49.280 --> 00:40:50.719
Yeah, and we've interviewed you.
00:40:50.880 --> 00:40:59.760
You sounded like you have sense, or you sounded like you, you know, uh that you can that you look like a performer, right?
00:40:59.840 --> 00:41:04.559
Yeah, but when you eventually get the opportunity, be the actual performer.
00:41:04.639 --> 00:41:08.400
Yes, don't describe performance, yes, you need to actually perform.
00:41:08.960 --> 00:41:16.719
Yeah, and and I think that's the foundation of what gets people um you know, all the opportunities for career progression generally.
00:41:17.119 --> 00:41:24.639
But for me, in terms of um some of the things we get in my hands dirty, uh working, but also like doing a PhD.
00:41:25.280 --> 00:41:30.480
Um I didn't have weekends is the truth, right?
00:41:30.960 --> 00:41:49.199
Because um doing Monday to Friday, building um in the organization working weekends, um, I'm on my computer punching keys away, or doing a research, or doing an interview, or you know, writing, or taking the feedback.
00:41:49.840 --> 00:41:52.079
And um that went on.
00:41:52.159 --> 00:41:56.239
I started my PhD in 2020, I completed it in 2025.
00:41:56.480 --> 00:41:57.119
Damn.
00:41:57.599 --> 00:42:00.159
That tells you the yeah, the stretch.
00:42:00.320 --> 00:42:02.960
It's like five years, five years, yeah, the stretch.
00:42:03.360 --> 00:42:05.920
And for every week, there's something to do.
00:42:06.159 --> 00:42:09.280
Wow, whether you're for five years, you didn't have a weekend, yeah.
00:42:09.360 --> 00:42:20.079
You know, and some weekends I'm traveling for work, which means so what I decided was every weekend, my Saturday, I I need to put like three hours into my PhD.
00:42:20.559 --> 00:42:24.239
On Sundays, I need to put at least one hour or two hours, right?
00:42:24.639 --> 00:42:34.159
But which means the uh and I'm also a family man, which means at the end of the day, um, you can call that managing my time effectively, right?
00:42:34.559 --> 00:42:37.920
Which is not always easy because like I'm tired all the time.
00:42:38.800 --> 00:42:40.400
When people say, How do you balance?
00:42:40.559 --> 00:42:41.599
I don't balance it.
00:42:41.840 --> 00:42:44.320
Uh there's no, I don't think there's a balance anywhere.
00:42:44.639 --> 00:42:45.679
They are just trade-offs.
00:42:45.760 --> 00:42:46.159
Yes, yes.
00:42:46.320 --> 00:42:57.039
So if I'm supposed to go hang out uh for four hours on the weekend, yeah, maybe I'll just do 30 minutes and use three and a half hours just on research, right?
00:42:57.119 --> 00:43:00.559
Yeah, um, or addressing a feedback from my supervisors.
00:43:00.719 --> 00:43:14.719
And so at the end of the day, that one of the trade-offs is knowing that you have 24 hours as everybody, and um you know what you need to do what you need to do to get to where you're going.
00:43:15.119 --> 00:43:19.440
Number two thing is around, I think sometimes sleep is overrated.
00:43:19.920 --> 00:43:25.119
Um wait when you are, you know, when sleep.
00:43:25.360 --> 00:43:26.719
Yeah, I think sleep is overrated.
00:43:26.960 --> 00:43:27.440
How many hours?
00:43:27.519 --> 00:43:29.679
How many hours of sleep did you get in the day?
00:43:30.400 --> 00:43:34.480
I don't calculate it, but I know I don't I don't do eight hours.
00:43:34.880 --> 00:43:36.239
Why do you think is overrated?
00:43:36.400 --> 00:43:41.039
Because I mean, when when I don't sleep, everybody collects around like a side.
00:43:41.199 --> 00:43:42.239
So you're on hedge, right?
00:43:42.400 --> 00:43:42.960
Yes, yes.
00:43:43.199 --> 00:43:47.760
So for me, I think I would describe it in a philosophical way.
00:43:48.400 --> 00:43:51.119
There's a time the gatekeeper of my brain opens it.
00:43:51.840 --> 00:43:59.679
And when I'm awake at that particular point in time, yeah, I can it's like you have, you know, when I I stop drinking.
00:44:00.079 --> 00:44:13.360
Coffee, but when I used to drink coffee actively, you know, you know that thing you feel when you drink uh uh two shots of Americano, and it seems something has just opening your brain and you have all the energy to go all in, right?
00:44:13.519 --> 00:44:17.599
Yeah, for me, I feel sometimes it's in it's around 1 a.m.
00:44:18.000 --> 00:44:22.000
in the night that's that gatekeeper opens it.
00:44:22.159 --> 00:44:24.800
Yeah, and so if anything I do between 1 a.m.
00:44:24.960 --> 00:44:29.840
and 6 a.m., if I'm committed to doing something, I cover a lot of grants.
00:44:30.079 --> 00:44:30.639
That's six hours.
00:44:30.719 --> 00:44:32.400
That's that's crazy, that's uh that's a lot of time.
00:44:32.880 --> 00:44:36.639
I I ensure that um I maximize that time.
00:44:36.719 --> 00:44:39.119
I and I discovered it by trying.
00:44:39.280 --> 00:44:39.599
Okay.
00:44:39.760 --> 00:44:43.519
So when I'm awake, I I can be struggling till around 1 a.m.
00:44:43.679 --> 00:44:44.639
But around 1 a.m.
00:44:44.960 --> 00:44:50.719
I have a form of energy that I think is unique, and I maximize the night to do that.
00:44:50.960 --> 00:44:55.360
I see, but I'm now curious like how do you now stay grounded mentally?
00:44:55.519 --> 00:44:57.599
Because I mean if you push I still sleep, right?
00:44:58.000 --> 00:45:00.239
Okay, so not at the regular time, like other people.
00:45:00.559 --> 00:45:08.559
Yeah, because the truth is that we are all humans and nature will always demand what it needs to demand from you.
00:45:08.800 --> 00:45:10.880
Yes, so I'm not saying people should go on.
00:45:10.960 --> 00:45:18.880
I'm not one of those people that'll say um all nights, uh all mornings, you know, it's not all grind, go big or go home.
00:45:19.039 --> 00:45:22.639
You know, sometimes I'm one of those people that will tell you to go home.
00:45:22.880 --> 00:45:28.800
If you cannot go big, go home because there's you know, you can reset at home, yes, there's love at home.
00:45:28.880 --> 00:45:34.639
Yeah, if there's no love at home, there's bed at home, go and sleep, yes, and you know, uh restrategize, right?
00:45:34.719 --> 00:45:37.760
So I'm I'm not saying it's not one of those eye-standing nonsense.
00:45:37.840 --> 00:45:49.440
Yeah, what I'm trying to say is that if you understand that the night time has a lot of enormous power for you, yes, if you have tried it, make use of it, maximize it.
00:45:49.519 --> 00:45:54.320
Some people it's in the night, they are able to strategize a business properly.
00:45:54.480 --> 00:46:00.960
Yeah, sometimes some people it's in the night, they're able to figure things out, yes, that they need to tell their team the following day.
00:46:01.119 --> 00:46:01.360
Exactly.
00:46:01.599 --> 00:46:15.199
So instead of you sleeping through it, why not maximize it for your own advantage and balance it up by maybe finding time to some people it's on weekends that they catch up on sleep properly, they just know that this week uh every weekend I'm not going anywhere.
00:46:15.519 --> 00:46:17.760
Uh um, you can't invite me out to any party.
00:46:17.920 --> 00:46:22.719
My weekend is when I'm paying for all the sleepless nights that I have.
00:46:22.800 --> 00:46:23.199
Yeah, yeah.
00:46:23.599 --> 00:46:34.800
When you maybe when you look at when you have a new baby and you're taking care of a new baby, it doesn't matter whether you are sleepy or not, you can sleep.
00:46:34.880 --> 00:46:35.440
Yes, yes.
00:46:35.679 --> 00:46:45.039
If that child is not comfortable, yeah, and that tells me that some it's you sleep is overrated because when the same you that used to sleep by 9 p.m.
00:46:45.599 --> 00:46:51.760
when you have a when you have a like infant, you need to stay awake to to be sure that they are okay before you sleep.
00:46:51.920 --> 00:46:57.920
So your sleep pattern is even just um disturbed in the first six months of their lives, right?
00:46:58.079 --> 00:47:05.679
So at the end of the day, um it's not motivational speaking, it's just to say if there's a power that you've discovered in the night, make use of it.
00:47:05.760 --> 00:47:07.679
I think for me, I made use of it a lot.
00:47:07.840 --> 00:47:11.920
And maybe number three thing to round up on that question is around resilience.
00:47:12.159 --> 00:47:13.199
Yes, yes.
00:47:13.760 --> 00:47:18.639
Um, there's power in resilience, and many of us learnt resilience in so many ways.
00:47:18.719 --> 00:47:24.800
I wrote an article a while ago on my LinkedIn that I learned resilience from going to the farm with my parents.
00:47:25.440 --> 00:47:29.519
Um, you know, we go to the farm very early in the morning, 6 a.m.
00:47:29.760 --> 00:47:32.639
we've left the house, and we trek two hours to the farm.
00:47:33.119 --> 00:47:37.760
So when you're getting to the farm around 8 a.m., all sweaty, you've trekked for two hours.
00:47:38.159 --> 00:47:39.519
You've not taken any food.
00:47:39.679 --> 00:47:39.840
Yeah.
00:47:40.000 --> 00:47:42.000
Then you get on the farm to start working.
00:47:42.320 --> 00:47:44.000
And you work till like 12.
00:47:44.480 --> 00:47:47.760
Is it around 12 noon that you take your first meal of the day?
00:47:47.920 --> 00:47:53.039
You rest for an hour, get back on the farm, work till like 4 p.m.
00:47:53.519 --> 00:47:56.400
and then take a two hour trek back home.
00:47:56.960 --> 00:47:58.719
You are getting home around 6 p.m.
00:47:58.880 --> 00:48:00.239
So that's six to six.
00:48:00.639 --> 00:48:08.719
And in those um, you know, between the six and six, you've only taken one meal and you've maybe rested for one hour.
00:48:08.880 --> 00:48:09.199
Yeah.
00:48:09.679 --> 00:48:14.000
And I did that for say for the first 16 years of my life.
00:48:14.159 --> 00:48:14.400
Yeah.
00:48:14.719 --> 00:48:15.039
Right?
00:48:15.119 --> 00:48:19.360
Um from age, from the age I was able to follow them to the farm.
00:48:19.599 --> 00:48:19.760
Right?
00:48:20.239 --> 00:48:20.480
Wow.
00:48:20.639 --> 00:48:20.800
Yeah.
00:48:20.960 --> 00:48:21.280
Okay.
00:48:21.519 --> 00:48:35.199
So so it's so when I started growing, when I became like age 18, 19, I started understanding that I think the resilience I have came from some of those experiences.
00:48:35.360 --> 00:48:39.599
For me, as young as I was, maybe at from the age of seven, I've started following them to the farm.
00:48:39.840 --> 00:48:42.800
When I'm tired on the road, my dad puts me on the shoulder.
00:48:43.039 --> 00:48:49.519
When when we when we started going with the vehicle, which means it's easier to go there, but you still have to work on the farm, right?
00:48:49.599 --> 00:48:50.719
In your own little way.
00:48:50.880 --> 00:48:54.880
And you can't leave the farm when everyone is not done, right?
00:48:55.039 --> 00:48:56.239
So you need to live at the right time.
00:48:56.320 --> 00:48:59.119
Whether you are frustrated or not, you need to stay there.
00:48:59.199 --> 00:49:05.760
Or you're working and you have a domestic accident where you eat yourself with the cutlass or o you still continue working.
00:49:05.920 --> 00:49:06.880
You can't take a break.
00:49:07.280 --> 00:49:19.280
So when you think about that, and also the resilience of understanding that you are uh working in the planting and raining season, and there's a there's a season you look forward to to harvest.
00:49:19.440 --> 00:49:25.679
On the day of harvest, I'm always the happiest one because I start reflecting on the times we came to the farm at 6 a.m.
00:49:25.840 --> 00:49:26.960
in the cold and the sun.
00:49:27.280 --> 00:49:33.920
Then when we're harvesting and they are using baskets to take the cassavas and the and uh all the farm produce, I'm always happy.
00:49:34.000 --> 00:49:44.159
Yeah, so it gives me so when I'm going through a season or a process, um I'm I'm not thinking about it like I'm suffering because um I have the end goal in mind.
00:49:44.239 --> 00:49:48.719
Yeah, and I think about the farm a lot when I'm going through a season or I'm embarking on a process.
00:49:48.880 --> 00:49:55.679
So imagine spending five years working, um, doing a postgraduate program, and you were still able to push through.
00:49:55.840 --> 00:49:58.960
I know a lot of people that you know they can't just manage it.
00:49:59.039 --> 00:50:01.920
Yeah, they it's not possible for them.
00:50:02.079 --> 00:50:07.119
Um, and I'm not trivializing it, uh, but resilience sometimes is what keeps you going.
00:50:07.199 --> 00:50:09.760
Okay, and you have the end goal in mind.
00:50:10.320 --> 00:50:13.199
If there's no light at the end of the tunnel, go with your torchlight.
00:50:13.519 --> 00:50:23.760
Yeah, so I just want to um you know, I want to point out something that is also most people also overlook.
00:50:24.639 --> 00:50:27.280
Being a problem solver in Africa is hard, right?
00:50:27.360 --> 00:50:32.400
Because there's a lot of uh institutions that you have to deal with, there's a lot of politics involved.
00:50:32.719 --> 00:50:45.760
But I just wanted to hear firsthand from you like what are like some of the labels that you have to get through, or some of the obstacles that you have to get through to actually get solutions that cross in this part of the world.
00:50:46.079 --> 00:50:50.159
Yeah, so it depends on the domain where you're solving the problem.
00:50:50.320 --> 00:50:53.360
If you are solving for the private sector, I think it's easier.
00:50:53.840 --> 00:51:00.079
You just need to prove, you know, and that's why we say uh proof of concept or your MVP.
00:51:00.239 --> 00:51:07.199
Some private uh organizations will work with you when they see that you've been able to prove that something works, right?
00:51:07.760 --> 00:51:24.159
Uh, but the fact that it works does not also mean that you won't get into issues on compliance, data protection, and some of those things they are uh they are gray areas, they are you know solid um you know rules that you need to follow in some situations.
00:51:24.400 --> 00:51:32.719
There are so there are also situations where you are building something novel, and what you are building has not been considered in the framework of compliance.
00:51:32.880 --> 00:51:35.840
Yes, yes, you know, it's like your innovation is ahead of its time.
00:51:36.000 --> 00:51:38.719
Yeah, you know, some solutions are actually ahead of their time.
00:51:38.880 --> 00:51:39.199
Yeah.
00:51:39.440 --> 00:51:43.039
Um, when it comes to public sector, you need to.
00:51:43.199 --> 00:51:47.679
Many people used to think working with the public sector is uh super hard.
00:51:47.920 --> 00:51:56.639
I think it's increasingly becoming um easier because we now have um very technical people in government as well.
00:51:56.719 --> 00:51:57.119
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:51:57.280 --> 00:51:57.440
Right?
00:51:57.519 --> 00:52:01.599
They might not be at the like the ends of affair, the face.
00:52:01.840 --> 00:52:11.119
Uh, but but we've we've seen situations where and some governments actually direct some problem-solving collaboration to those technical people.
00:52:11.360 --> 00:52:17.039
And once those technical people understand what you want to do, their word is law to the upper rank.
00:52:17.119 --> 00:52:17.199
Yes.
00:52:17.440 --> 00:52:25.760
And you know, that way you're able to have ease of access to um to actually get like the public sector buying in solving a problem.
00:52:26.000 --> 00:52:37.199
Number two thing is around how um multilateral organizations now do a lot of hand holding between the private sector and the and the public sector.
00:52:37.360 --> 00:52:37.599
Yeah.
00:52:37.840 --> 00:52:49.599
Where as a multilateral organization, you've worked with the government of Nigeria, maybe on energy, you know what the issues are, and the government of Nigeria is looking for solutions for energy.
00:52:49.760 --> 00:52:59.760
That multilateral organization brings that issue to you, the private sector uh player that they believe can solve the issue, and they bring you in a collaborative marriage, right?
00:52:59.840 --> 00:53:04.960
That way is also very seamless because there's a there's a broker in the middle that is doing that.
00:53:05.119 --> 00:53:10.639
But that doesn't mean that um in some specific sectors, we don't have issues, right?
00:53:10.960 --> 00:53:19.519
Uh, if you are innovating in healthcare currently on the continent, there's still a lot of like gray area when it comes to compliance, especially with clinical trials.
00:53:19.679 --> 00:53:29.840
You you see a lot of young innovators in healthcare asking questions, looking for opportunities to get permission or a license to do clinical trials.
00:53:30.000 --> 00:53:33.519
Yeah, in so many countries in Africa, there is a gray area.
00:53:33.599 --> 00:53:41.599
Uh it's uh like case-by-case basis, not as if there's a uh template or there's a portal where you need to go to to apply for such, right?
00:53:42.159 --> 00:53:46.639
Or things around data protection that Nigeria, for example, is really doing well with now.
00:53:46.960 --> 00:53:50.320
The Nigerian Data Protection Uh Commission is doing amazing work.
00:53:50.400 --> 00:53:55.920
I think Nigeria has a strong structure in Africa now for organizational data audits and compliance.
00:53:56.000 --> 00:53:56.159
Yes.
00:53:56.320 --> 00:54:17.440
I think Rwanda also, um, you know, this second year in a row that we um the second time that we've uh gotten the data controller license, you know, and they encourage every organization to report all your data processes, audit processes to uh the um thing is the cybersecurity center, and then you get your license.
00:54:17.599 --> 00:54:23.119
So I think um there are still so many challenges, especially in some sectors.
00:54:23.599 --> 00:54:29.840
Uh but in some uh sectors that are mature, it's easier for the private sector to work with the public sector in Africa.
00:54:30.079 --> 00:54:36.880
In fintech in Nigeria, for example, there are like you know, it's so mature, there are clear pathways to innovation there.
00:54:37.039 --> 00:54:43.519
You know where you need to go to to get a license, you know, you know who you need to collaborate, collaborate with on something.
00:54:43.679 --> 00:54:45.679
Uh but in healthcare, it's not like that.
00:54:45.840 --> 00:54:48.960
In education, things are coming up a little bit as well.
00:54:49.119 --> 00:54:54.639
So uh, but generally, I think we should have a change of mindset that it's very hard to work with government.
00:54:54.800 --> 00:54:58.159
I think government to these days they are looking for solutions.
00:54:58.239 --> 00:54:58.639
Yes.
00:54:58.800 --> 00:55:04.000
Um, especially with the popular uh popularity of digital public infrastructure.
00:55:04.320 --> 00:55:19.119
Government um is now able to deliver public services at scale, at affordable rates, but at a scale that is also um you know uh modular and useful and it can serve so many people at the same time, you know, with one solution.
00:55:19.199 --> 00:55:25.440
Yeah, and the private sector um is helping so many government uh domains to do that.
00:55:25.599 --> 00:55:25.920
Yeah.
00:55:26.159 --> 00:55:28.480
So um I that's from my experience.
00:55:28.559 --> 00:55:31.360
But I know you know many people always tell you it's hard to work with government.
00:55:31.840 --> 00:55:37.280
It's because of the way governments are structured, yes, and you need to you need to go through it the way it is.
00:55:37.360 --> 00:55:58.079
But we've also seen changes where government is becoming agile in some countries, uh, especially when you now have a lot of young people in government who understand because uh when we say partnership for the digital economy, many young people looking for opportunity to solve problems in collaboration with government, um, you know, they work in the digital, right?
00:55:58.159 --> 00:56:02.960
Yeah, but also you can't innovate in many domains without government backing.
00:56:03.119 --> 00:56:07.440
So it's not like an enemy versus enemy kind of thing.
00:56:07.519 --> 00:56:09.199
You the collaboration needs to happen.
00:56:09.519 --> 00:56:14.079
However, it needs to happen, we need to always look for that middle ground for it.
00:56:14.639 --> 00:56:29.199
And now, as you were speaking, I was asking myself, like just putting myself in your shoes, like if you had to see all of these uh issues and um these obstacles, I mean you don't have to deal with it if you do if you didn't want to.
00:56:29.519 --> 00:56:38.079
But I'm just I'm just curious to like to know like what gives you hope and optimism about the future of this of this continent when it comes to problem solving.
00:56:38.480 --> 00:56:42.559
Because we know that those problems are not gonna go away if we don't do anything.
00:56:42.719 --> 00:56:48.559
Yeah, and even if we do do, even if we do something, it still wouldn't be easier, right?
00:56:48.639 --> 00:56:58.239
Because I think it's getting more complex as population grows as more like you know, um as more civilization comes, as more growth comes.
00:56:58.639 --> 00:57:02.880
But I want to hear from you, like, why should someone be optimistic about the future?
00:57:03.119 --> 00:57:07.119
I think about uh problem solving in Africa in terms of cumulative impact.
00:57:07.360 --> 00:57:15.199
Yeah, because sometimes we're looking for for an earthquake kind of impact that comes in an ecosystem and the problem goes away.
00:57:15.280 --> 00:57:19.440
Yeah, but the truth is that problems take time to solve.
00:57:20.159 --> 00:57:22.880
And some problems are like an elephant.
00:57:23.039 --> 00:57:31.840
Yes, somebody needs to solve the problem from the from the trunk, yes, somebody needs to solve it from the trumpet, somebody needs to solve it from the horn, right?
00:57:32.079 --> 00:57:33.519
Um uh from the tail.
00:57:33.760 --> 00:57:38.400
So I think about um solving problems in Africa in terms of cumulative impact.
00:57:38.559 --> 00:57:52.079
Yes, over time, the different um attempts that we are all making or the different interventions that we are bringing into the ecosystem, at some point we reach a singularity where we're able to have a bigger impact.
00:57:52.639 --> 00:57:58.559
Um, so the motivation um needs to be in it, it needs to be come from inside of you.
00:57:58.880 --> 00:58:06.400
But I also think about it in terms of when I'm 70 and um I'm seated reflecting on all that I've done.
00:58:06.639 --> 00:58:14.079
Do I want to have regrets not uh trying to solve a problem or not to be part of something that was bigger than me in my younger days?
00:58:14.239 --> 00:58:22.400
Yeah, or will I be proud that when my children or the younger generation are asking me, what did I do with my youth, what would be my response to them?
00:58:22.800 --> 00:58:49.039
And when I think about it that way, I want to be part of um either an organization or a team or a personal project that solves a problem in my own little way, because uh no, um we um I see it as uh different people doing different parts uh based on their own expertise, and we are solving problems in the same industry, but we're approaching it from different angles.
00:58:49.199 --> 00:58:53.599
And at some point, because you've seen look at polio, for example.
00:58:53.840 --> 00:59:05.199
If there were no vaccines for polio and there was intentional encouragement of countries uh to you know vaccinate people against polio, we would not have been able to eradicate it.
00:59:05.280 --> 00:59:12.559
So look at it, and these are issues that took 25 years, 30 years, 40 years to figure out and to reach that stage, right?
00:59:12.719 --> 00:59:17.679
So let's look at problem as um not something we can solve immediately.
00:59:18.000 --> 00:59:22.719
Um when you talk about democracy, for example, it's not something you can solve in a year.
00:59:22.800 --> 00:59:36.159
Yeah, uh, there is uh like true democracy when you look at um how elections are managed, how candidates emerge, how primaries are done, what are the um the clauses of our constitutions?
00:59:36.400 --> 00:59:38.480
Uh are we enforcing law?
00:59:38.719 --> 00:59:42.079
Uh are we also upholding ethical leadership?
00:59:42.239 --> 00:59:43.840
When you look at it's different parts.
00:59:43.920 --> 00:59:52.400
So you see organizations work on elections, you see organizations work on citizens' engagement, yes, you see some organizations working on um equity and governance.
00:59:52.480 --> 01:00:04.159
Yeah, you know, all the work that we are all doing will come together at some point to reach that stage of uh solution singularity that we can say we are proud of what we've done.
01:00:04.400 --> 01:00:10.719
Look at it in terms of Millennium Development Goals, uh, you know, then the SDG, right?
01:00:11.199 --> 01:00:16.880
These are ambitions that give people the direction of what they need to do in terms of that problem.
01:00:17.039 --> 01:00:26.880
Either you're doing it from the advocacy side or the investment side or the program implementation side or the um maybe policy making side.
01:00:27.039 --> 01:00:31.840
At the end of the day, all we are all trying to do is to solve that problem however long it might take.
01:00:31.920 --> 01:00:37.519
But we cannot because uh it will take long not to take a stab at solving the problem.
01:00:37.840 --> 01:00:41.599
Yeah, and I think as you as you were speaking, you you mentioned something about impact, right?
01:00:41.760 --> 01:00:47.519
Which is, I think, is the one thing that keeps people um hooked or keeps people like hopeful.
01:00:47.599 --> 01:00:47.920
Yeah.
01:00:48.079 --> 01:00:59.599
There was this one time I came across your post on LinkedIn calling people who just give uh select like you know, put out bogus representations of the work that they've done, and even when they haven't contributed.
01:00:59.679 --> 01:00:59.840
Yeah.
01:01:00.079 --> 01:01:04.559
And I really wanted to, you know, hear from you in person, like what's your take on performative impact?
01:01:04.719 --> 01:01:21.679
Because I think right now, if you go online, a lot of people, some people were probably at uh the BAO summit yesterday, and they probably didn't, you know, contribute to any conversation, but then they will come on LinkedIn and then they will write something so yeah, so long and lengthy, and you think they actually moved mountains.
01:01:21.760 --> 01:01:22.239
Yeah, right.
01:01:22.320 --> 01:01:33.679
And just wanted to hear like what are what is your thought on that and what are the dangers of you know prioritizing performative impact and in terms of how it affects our ability to move forward.
01:01:33.920 --> 01:01:36.000
And finally, like how can people sport?
01:01:36.719 --> 01:01:43.840
Like the people who are consumers, how can you sport when someone is actually being very bogus about their contribution, you know?
01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:57.199
Um I think social media has legitimized emptiness, you know, and it also it has also amplified um performative impact, I like it, like you put it.
01:01:57.599 --> 01:02:07.280
Um you can have huge following by doing a lot of eye sanding um content, yes.
01:02:07.519 --> 01:02:12.079
Um, and we are in the world of colors and glites, right?
01:02:12.400 --> 01:02:14.480
And you can have huge following with that.
01:02:14.960 --> 01:02:16.639
But are you really doing the work?
01:02:17.039 --> 01:02:19.199
No, you know, and we have a lot of that.
01:02:19.440 --> 01:02:25.360
And a school of thought would also say people busy doing the work don't have time to even come online to say anything.
01:02:25.599 --> 01:02:29.679
And and that's funny because you've okay, we'll talk about how you've managed to balance.
01:02:30.159 --> 01:02:31.599
Yeah, like people doing the work.
01:02:31.760 --> 01:02:37.039
Yeah, uh, some people say people actually doing the work, getting their hands dirty, don't have the time to come and come and tell you about it.
01:02:37.440 --> 01:02:40.079
Which I also agree with to some extent.
01:02:40.400 --> 01:02:44.000
But the truth is that social media has come to stay.
01:02:44.079 --> 01:02:51.760
Yes, it is the um closest medium of communication and connection in the society today.
01:02:51.920 --> 01:03:05.920
Yeah, so I think we need to create an opportunity, and I also wrote an anecdote sometimes around the fact that uh people actually doing the work also needs to now take the bull by the own and find time to actually show how it is properly done.
01:03:06.079 --> 01:03:17.280
Yes, and counter the and then when you put when people actually doing the work are also on the same space where people doing the fakery are, you can actually know who is original and who is fake.
01:03:17.360 --> 01:03:18.159
Who is fake, yeah.
01:03:18.320 --> 01:03:25.039
But if the people doing the original work are not telling their own stories, people will always, you know, um uh praise the fake.
01:03:25.119 --> 01:03:28.320
It's like you not telling your own story when the hunter does not tell his own story.
01:03:28.400 --> 01:03:33.440
Yeah, the when the uh lion does not tell his own story, is that how they put it?
01:03:33.519 --> 01:03:34.239
The I think the hunter.
01:03:34.559 --> 01:03:38.960
No, when the hunter does not tell his own story, the um story will always favor the lion or something.
01:03:39.039 --> 01:03:40.159
Like you understand what I want to say.
01:03:40.239 --> 01:03:40.880
I guess what you're saying.
01:03:41.039 --> 01:03:47.519
So you need to um we need to find a way for people actually doing the work to also use those mediums, right?
01:03:47.679 --> 01:03:48.239
Yes, yes, yes.
01:03:48.400 --> 01:03:54.239
Yes, you will say they are busy, they don't have time to talk about what they are doing, but there is power in storytelling.
01:03:54.400 --> 01:04:10.239
Yes, there's power in it, and I think all of us must be storytellers, yeah, because we are not just telling stories to uh to let people know that we are doing great work, we are also inspiring a generation to believe that it's possible and it can be done, right?
01:04:10.639 --> 01:04:18.239
Uh, but we we live in a world where um it's color, it's glitch, it's more it's perfect.
01:04:18.400 --> 01:04:24.960
Uh, we're looking for, and that's why we have a lot of awardpreneurs who are looking for people who are looking for accolades.
01:04:25.199 --> 01:04:28.960
I believe social media has also created what I call congratulations addiction.
01:04:29.679 --> 01:04:38.320
Yeah, where people, some people cannot stay one month without looking for something that's something people should congratulate them for.
01:04:38.480 --> 01:04:45.519
And when you do that, we've seen people who go to other people's events and take pictures from those events and they present it on social media like their own.
01:04:46.400 --> 01:04:48.800
And they always have the right English, you know.
01:04:48.960 --> 01:04:54.639
Like, you know, AI is not even helping the matter now, like they have the right things to say, you know.
01:04:55.199 --> 01:04:58.000
And you know, uh, go on LinkedIn.
01:04:58.159 --> 01:05:02.559
Everybody is uh almost like a coach, everybody's AI expert.
01:05:02.719 --> 01:05:03.119
Yes.
01:05:03.280 --> 01:05:08.239
Um, there are some people who are AI experts today, but two years ago they were blockchain experts.
01:05:08.639 --> 01:05:09.920
They go with the tides, yeah.
01:05:10.000 --> 01:05:11.360
They go with the tides, right?
01:05:11.840 --> 01:05:21.840
And then if tomorrow um green economy or circular economy is the thing, then they become circular ex on on LinkedIn enthusiasts, you know.
01:05:22.079 --> 01:05:29.920
So social media um created a level playing ground for both people who want to fake it and those who are actually doing the work.
01:05:30.000 --> 01:05:33.679
But the truth is that we cannot keep complaining about those who are faking it.
01:05:33.840 --> 01:05:39.519
If you that you're actually doing the work, you don't have any don't have any benchmark to look at.
01:05:39.599 --> 01:05:42.159
So you that you are doing the real work, what does your work look like?
01:05:42.320 --> 01:05:42.800
Right?
01:05:43.039 --> 01:05:48.639
So, storytelling, I wouldn't say just social media posters, but storytelling, intentional storytelling.
01:05:49.280 --> 01:05:58.960
And it doesn't have to be social media, it might be you know, are you putting the originality of your work and the outcome in mediums that people that matter can actually see it?
01:05:59.119 --> 01:06:02.960
Yes, uh, or you Are you sharing with the next generation to inspire them, right?
01:06:03.039 --> 01:06:07.760
Yeah, so um it's the ecosystem is like that, and it will continue.
01:06:07.840 --> 01:06:15.360
We always have people doing the work who are getting less attention, and we always get people who are the loudest who are going to get the attention, right?
01:06:15.599 --> 01:06:23.360
But I also think in the type of balance I'm talking about, you can be doing the actual work and you are very loud about the work, you know.
01:06:23.440 --> 01:06:33.440
Um, because the truth is that um if we don't have people putting out their original work there, we don't have something to benchmark those who are doing the fake work.
01:06:33.599 --> 01:06:34.079
Yeah.
01:06:34.320 --> 01:06:36.159
And I think that's something you've done.
01:06:36.320 --> 01:06:46.880
But the people who follow you on LinkedIn or Facebook, you're constantly sharing, you know, anecdotes, uh, you know, um words of wisdom and even talking about the work that you do, but you're also very busy.
01:06:46.960 --> 01:07:00.239
And I think every time I speak to entrepreneurs who are doing amazing stuff, they usually tell you that they're not able to find the time to create, they're not able to, they don't they don't get to sit down for like two hours to talk about the work that they're doing.
01:07:00.480 --> 01:07:02.480
How do you how do you make it happen?
01:07:02.559 --> 01:07:03.679
Like what's your secret?
01:07:04.159 --> 01:07:06.239
No secret, I'm just intentional about it.
01:07:06.320 --> 01:07:11.119
I've I'm I've not been consistent of late as well, because there are so many things going on for me.
01:07:11.280 --> 01:07:13.280
Uh, but I still find time to share.
01:07:13.440 --> 01:07:15.679
And I share authentic stories.
01:07:15.840 --> 01:07:16.159
Okay.
01:07:16.480 --> 01:07:25.119
I don't use, I don't even um, you know, you know, these days with AI, people can say, Oh, you can turn out three contents per day, you know.
01:07:25.199 --> 01:07:30.880
That's not if you have followed my content, I would I'll tell you the story from my experience, right?
01:07:31.119 --> 01:07:33.760
Yes, yes, and I'll bring out the lessons from it, right?
01:07:33.840 --> 01:07:47.039
So I I just um I think it's just intentionality to say, yeah, um, I want to share from a place of authenticity, and I also want to um inspire a generation to believe that it's possible.
01:07:47.199 --> 01:07:54.400
Yeah, uh, one of the um uh articles I wrote recently is around uh my early days in entrepreneurship.
01:07:54.639 --> 01:08:03.039
And you know, you can see a lot of people made comments about it, but the number of people who reached out to me directly to say, man, I thought I was weird.
01:08:03.119 --> 01:08:05.519
I never knew you had this kind of journey as well.
01:08:05.679 --> 01:08:15.440
Where I talked about how from age 16 I was already taking stabs at entrepreneurship and I was negotiating things with my uncle, with my um aunt's husband.
01:08:15.679 --> 01:08:21.119
I was um yeah, you know, I'm sure maybe you read that I was selling recharge cards.
01:08:21.199 --> 01:08:24.880
Yeah, uh, I tried to do a typing of a computer typing business.
01:08:25.039 --> 01:08:30.880
Yeah, there was a time I was selling um mathematics and English CDs on the street of Oday in New York Town.
01:08:31.279 --> 01:08:36.399
And I would, you know, and the older I got, the more I became conscious of that part of me.
01:08:36.479 --> 01:08:47.279
And you know, that innocence of innovation, you know, that you can have as a teenager, I think is good before you become become like unnecessarily self-conscious, right?
01:08:47.359 --> 01:08:51.520
Yeah, and those are things that many entrepreneurs or professionals are struggling with.
01:08:51.680 --> 01:09:00.319
But after I shared that, many people were like, Oh, so it's actually true that we were losing the innovative innocence that we had when we were pretty young.
01:09:00.560 --> 01:09:08.479
Where in your maybe when you were 22, you could approach an Obama in a place and say, I'm looking for funds to do this, or you share, you pick yourself.
01:09:08.640 --> 01:09:10.960
But as you're growing older, you become self-conscious.
01:09:11.359 --> 01:09:11.920
Like you have to think about it.
01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:15.199
You're thinking, Oh, people say when people say I'm weird, you know.
01:09:15.520 --> 01:09:18.880
But the truth is that as an entrepreneur, you need to maintain that innocence.
01:09:18.960 --> 01:09:23.680
If you are going to, you know, raise funds, speak to collaborators and everything.
01:09:23.760 --> 01:09:25.760
So, yeah, intentionality with sharing.
01:09:25.840 --> 01:09:33.439
So I still ensure that maybe twice in two weeks, yeah, I still share, I create time to do it either in the night or early in the morning.
01:09:33.520 --> 01:09:35.199
Yeah, I still find time to do it.
01:09:35.279 --> 01:09:44.000
Okay, but I stopped sending my newsletter because I can't manage, and I'm not that person that would give my newsletter to a virtual assistant to do for me.
01:09:44.159 --> 01:09:50.960
I know many people will do that and just give the topics to a virtual assistant to write it for them and they shall do the but it has to be authentic.
01:09:51.199 --> 01:09:52.560
It has to be authentic for me.
01:09:52.720 --> 01:09:58.159
Um, I know because I'm not trying to build a social media following as an influencer.
01:09:58.239 --> 01:10:00.159
I won't, I'm not an influencer, right?
01:10:00.319 --> 01:10:07.279
If I want to be an influencer, maybe I'll need to um you know launch those channels where um my newsletter somebody's managing.
01:10:07.439 --> 01:10:12.720
No, for me, I just want to share authentic stories when I'm able to share it at my own pace.
01:10:12.960 --> 01:10:16.159
What does uh human-centered design look like in an AI era?
01:10:16.319 --> 01:10:20.239
Because right now you can you can prototype solutions very quickly, yeah.
01:10:20.399 --> 01:10:26.079
Um, like you can uh find connections between problems in a like very quickly.
01:10:26.960 --> 01:10:32.479
But like what is still going to be the relevance and importance of human-centered design in an AI era?
01:10:32.720 --> 01:10:38.479
Yeah, so AI has not taken away your uh discovery and understanding process.
01:10:38.800 --> 01:10:39.840
That needs to be human.
01:10:40.000 --> 01:10:49.119
Okay, it is where you want to articulate the insight from discover and understand stage that AI helps you to articulate it better and you can quickly do your prototype faster.
01:10:49.199 --> 01:10:49.439
Yeah.
01:10:49.600 --> 01:10:55.119
So, but it doesn't remove that AI solutions are even built for humans.
01:10:55.359 --> 01:10:57.520
So at the end of the day, you still need to be able to do that.
01:10:57.680 --> 01:11:18.000
The humans, you can't take humans away from um, I'm a scholar of social technical theory, yeah, and I understand what the connections between technology, people, systems, um, and um, you know, um you know, the end users of the technology and the enablers of the technology, when you bring everything together, it brings a very unique dynamics.
01:11:18.319 --> 01:11:22.000
And the truth is that you can't take people or human out of that mix.
01:11:22.159 --> 01:11:25.520
If you take human out of technology, what are you building it for?
01:11:25.600 --> 01:11:25.760
Yeah.
01:11:26.079 --> 01:11:30.159
Whatever product you're building, whatever you're building is to make the life of humans easy.
01:11:30.239 --> 01:11:30.479
Yes.
01:11:30.640 --> 01:11:35.359
For them to have more proficiency and efficiency, yeah, and for them to do life faster.
01:11:35.920 --> 01:11:48.560
So if you can't remove, I you know, it's it's just an instrument of speed to quickly ship and to validate, but it doesn't take away that the data that is feeding into it is human-facing.
01:11:48.720 --> 01:11:49.039
Yeah.
01:11:49.279 --> 01:11:49.600
Okay.
01:11:49.920 --> 01:11:51.920
And I think thank you, thank you for sharing that.
01:11:52.079 --> 01:12:02.720
And I think now, uh, just to wrap up, in the interest of time, we're gonna take two scenarios um that we relate to your work and just to give the audience a chance to see how you think through the solutions.
01:12:03.039 --> 01:12:20.479
So let's imagine that you are managing um a startup incubator, and there's this young founder who wants to build a solution to tackle the the um logistical issues with distributing food um from the farms to the table.
01:12:20.560 --> 01:12:20.800
Yeah.
01:12:21.039 --> 01:12:23.680
In um, like let's say, give an example in Kigali.
01:12:23.920 --> 01:12:24.560
Yeah, right.
01:12:24.960 --> 01:12:33.920
But there are a lot of international coaches who've been brought in, like from Silicon Valley, who have this idea of how this should operate.
01:12:34.239 --> 01:12:47.920
How is this person going to balance, you know, building with the realities of the coaching that they're getting from these international coaches and balancing that with what they see on ground to ensure that it actually solves the problem?
01:12:48.159 --> 01:12:54.079
Like, obviously, this is a confusion that most people would face because you don't know enough to take a stand.
01:12:54.560 --> 01:12:57.680
But how is how would you advise this person to actually find that balance?
01:12:57.920 --> 01:13:00.880
For me, I would say the innovator should think about three things.
01:13:01.039 --> 01:13:01.279
Yeah.
01:13:01.439 --> 01:13:03.039
Um, there are coaches, right?
01:13:03.199 --> 01:13:07.520
But there are people you call mentors, coaches and sponsors.
01:13:08.239 --> 01:13:10.880
Uh, a mentor speaks to you.
01:13:11.439 --> 01:13:15.840
A coach speaks with you, and then a sponsor speaks about you.
01:13:16.000 --> 01:13:16.560
Yeah.
01:13:16.880 --> 01:13:21.920
And that doesn't mean that because you have a coach, you should be docile about what you're building.
01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:22.159
Yeah.
01:13:22.319 --> 01:13:24.000
Or for you not to have your own opinion.
01:13:24.159 --> 01:13:24.319
Yeah.
01:13:24.479 --> 01:13:31.439
I like a combination of your own understanding of a context, yeah, where you are building, and the knowledge of scale.
01:13:31.600 --> 01:13:43.439
So maybe the coaches will bring um knowledge of scale because they came from where you can call the Silicon Valley, where you know it's about speed, capital, and you know, uh speed to the market.
01:13:43.680 --> 01:13:46.560
But in your own context, that might not be the situation.
01:13:46.720 --> 01:13:53.439
And in Africa, innovation is not, we are not just um you know, uh leveraging already existing race.
01:13:53.760 --> 01:13:55.039
Sometimes we are building from the ground.
01:13:56.079 --> 01:14:10.079
And when you uh jettison that insight for um because a coach has said something that sounds interesting but does not connect to your context, you are the one to be blamed because you are the innovator.
01:14:10.319 --> 01:14:12.640
Okay, uh, and a coach is not a commander, yeah.
01:14:12.960 --> 01:14:17.840
Yeah, so I would say the innovator should uh hold, and that's why your own research is important.
01:14:17.920 --> 01:14:20.079
Yes, your human-centered design research.
01:14:20.159 --> 01:14:22.560
Yeah, what is that insight that you are building for?
01:14:22.640 --> 01:14:22.960
Yeah, yeah.
01:14:23.199 --> 01:14:26.479
Leverage and a coach advice people, they speak with you.
01:14:26.800 --> 01:14:36.000
So at the end of the day, pick what is yours from all that they have said um and blend it with what is your own reality and innovate with it.
01:14:36.319 --> 01:14:36.640
Okay.
01:14:36.800 --> 01:14:44.319
And if there's one thing you would change about how like, you know, uh Africa's innovation ecosystems operate today, what would that be?
01:14:44.720 --> 01:14:50.479
I think I would change uh people caressing the problem on the edge to actually getting their answer.
01:14:51.119 --> 01:14:51.920
Oh, okay.
01:14:52.079 --> 01:15:02.560
So we're gonna go into like a final round, just one word, uh, just one answer, and we just like get going and just take maybe like five of them.
01:15:02.800 --> 01:15:04.720
Uh they call it like a quick fire round.
01:15:05.039 --> 01:15:09.920
So would you prefer systems thinking or spontaneity in your work?
01:15:12.399 --> 01:15:13.119
Systems thinking.
01:15:13.439 --> 01:15:14.479
Systems thinking, yeah.
01:15:14.720 --> 01:15:16.960
Structure or experimentation in your work?
01:15:17.840 --> 01:15:22.640
Experimentation okay, long form thinking or fast execution.
01:15:25.199 --> 01:15:26.239
Long form thinking.
01:15:26.479 --> 01:15:27.359
Long form thinking.
01:15:28.000 --> 01:15:31.039
Um policy conversations or design conversations.
01:15:31.119 --> 01:15:32.319
I know you work on the design.
01:15:32.640 --> 01:15:42.880
Design okay, and building products or building ecosystems, ecosystems, ecosystems, and the final one one one breakthrough idea or years of consistency.
01:15:46.479 --> 01:15:47.600
That's a very hard one.
01:15:47.840 --> 01:15:48.640
Yes, yes.
01:15:49.119 --> 01:15:50.079
That's a hard one.
01:15:50.479 --> 01:15:51.920
One breakthrough idea.
01:15:53.279 --> 01:15:54.159
Yeah, but I can't.
01:15:56.159 --> 01:15:56.479
Yeah.
01:15:56.640 --> 01:15:56.880
Okay.
01:15:57.359 --> 01:16:00.479
There was a question the previous guest said I should ask you.
01:16:00.800 --> 01:16:26.000
Uh, I don't know if I remember it fully, but they said if uh you had you were out of like uh the pro the eyes of the public or something, where like you there was no you didn't have to worry about anything in your life, or worry about judgment, or what would you be doing with your life if you didn't have to worry about the scrutiny of the world or you know the the pressure that comes with your role and all of that?
01:16:26.399 --> 01:16:43.359
I'll be a pan-African evangelist talking about the history of Africa, yes, how we have evolved from where we were to where we are now, yeah, and I'll be speaking vehemently against um the African inferiority complex.
01:16:43.680 --> 01:16:44.399
Okay, okay.
01:16:44.560 --> 01:16:45.439
That's what I'll be doing.
01:16:45.680 --> 01:16:47.359
All right, thank you so much, David.
01:16:47.600 --> 01:16:50.479
What would you want to know from the next guest?
01:16:51.760 --> 01:17:01.039
Um, I want to know what they think about um artificial intelligence and the future of work.
01:17:01.520 --> 01:17:03.039
Yes, with artificial intelligence.
01:17:03.119 --> 01:17:04.000
Yeah, yeah, with artificial intelligence.
01:17:04.079 --> 01:17:04.960
I think that does that really be.
01:17:05.359 --> 01:17:16.000
Because I think many of us might eventually retire to a farm and just have a rabbit and our and our horses, and yeah, because like artificial intelligence is fine if you're good.
01:17:16.079 --> 01:17:19.680
Yeah, but like, but uh, I would like to Will work really matter in the future.
01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:20.159
Right.
01:17:20.399 --> 01:17:22.079
I would like to hear what they think about that.
01:17:22.239 --> 01:17:27.359
But in the meantime, this has been very insightful for me, and I think it will be also very insightful for the guests.
01:17:27.600 --> 01:17:28.640
Thank you so much for coming.
01:17:28.800 --> 01:17:29.439
It's my pleasure.
01:17:29.600 --> 01:17:32.079
Um, hopefully, we'll keep the conversation going.
01:17:35.279 --> 01:17:45.600
This podcast is brought to you by Tori Branding, a communications and marketing agency helping brands tell stories that build communities, drive growth, and create meaningful connections.
01:17:45.840 --> 01:17:51.680
If you're looking to uncover the stories behind your brand, event, or organization, we'd love to hear from you.
01:17:51.920 --> 01:17:53.920
Learn more by visiting our website.