ACERCA DE ESTE EPISODIO
The CFPB’s 2026 amendments to Regulation B removed longstanding disparate impact language and adopted the position that the Equal Credit Opportunity Act does not impose disparate impact liability. That change immediately sparked litigation and renewed debate about the scope of fair lending laws. In this episode, we explore a question that matters to lenders, compliance professionals, and legal teams: what happens if courts ultimately reject the CFPB’s interpretation?
About the Authors
Inglés
Estados Unidos
TRANSCRIPCIÓN 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
BUSCAR EPISODIOS ANTERIORES
Buscar episodios anteriores de Womble Perspectives .
OTROS EPISODIOS EN ESTE PODCAST
The FCC has revised its approach to regulating certain foreign-produced power inverters, scaling back a broader restriction that was introduced over cybersecurity and national security concerns. In this episode, we examine why power inverters became a focus of federal scrutiny, how the FCC’s Covere…
Today, we’re tackling part two of what it takes to find expert witnesses, and we’re following up with the next big question: once you’ve got a shortlist of candidates, how do you choose the best one? It turns out, it’s not just about degrees and licenses. There are multiple other factors that can m…
As Womble Bond Dickinson celebrates its 150th anniversary, Lori Patton sits down with Sarah Motley Stone, Charlotte Office Managing Partner, to reflect on more than two decades of growth, leadership, and service at the firm.
Sarah shares her journey from a first-year summer associate who never exp…
Today’s episode is part of our Recruiting Success stories series. Lori Patton, our Chief Recruiting Officer, sits down with Tomio Narita, a partner in our San Francisco office and co-leader of the firm’s Class Action Defense Team.
More about WBD's Class Action Litigation practice.
Today we’re digging into a potentially groundbreaking legal ruling about AI. It’s the first time a federal court has weighed in on whether chats with an AI tool like Claude or ChatGPT can be considered privileged. Spoiler: the court said no. And this could have implications for businesses and legal…
Descargo de responsabilidad: El podcast y el arte incluidos en esta página son de Womble Bond Dickinson, que es propiedad de su propietario y no está afiliado ni respaldado por Listen Notes, Inc.
EDITAR
Gracias por ayudar a mantener actualizada la base de datos de podcasts.
