ACERCA DE ESTE EPISODIO
If you are helping build something that might kill everyone, maybe stop doing that.
Ideally, when you do stop, tell everyone else to also stop building it.
That is certainly the obvious, first-level thing to do. You need a damn good reason to decide that no, actually you should keep building the thing that might kill everyone.
Scott Alexander is worried too many people are insisting upon this too loudly. He comes out against a strategy focused on getting people to stop. I disagree. I think many of the claims, arguments and rhetoric in Scott's post are quite poor by the standards that Scott Alexander would apply to himself.
Scott clearly continues to support advocacy for a global pause, or what he calls Plan A. His objection is to those advocating primarily or exclusively for SURA, which stands for ‘stop unilaterally and raise awareness.’ The practical differences here are smaller than they may at first appear.
This post first lays out my understanding of Scott Alexander's core claims, then gives my core reactions to those claims, then goes over various questions in detail along with gathering the resulting discussions.
Table of Contents
Outline:
(01:20) Scott Alexander's Core Claims
(05:06) My High Level Responses To Scott's Core Claims
(08:08) Briefly on Alignment
(10:11) Probabilities and How They Work
(13:25) Building a Thing That Might Kill Everyone is Deontologically Evil
(20:38) People Quitting Major Labs While Raising Alarms Obviously Works
(24:39) On AI Forecasting
(27:31) Advancing Capabilities Burns Timeline
(29:34) But China
(33:23) Ethical People Can Disagree With You
(34:45) There Are More Than Two Outcomes
(38:01) Efforts Are Complementary, Not Mutually Exclusive
(40:23) If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies
(41:55) Vaniver is Not Convinced
(46:19) There Is No Consensus That We Should Exclusively Focus on Plan A
(56:01) It's Not the Incentives, It's You
(58:08) Anthropic Is Not Optimally Pursuing These Plans
(01:04:00) Against Against Sura
The original text contained 2 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
November 2nd, 2026
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ziMP83D2JYWRQ5jtu/scott-alexander-s-against-sura-seems-deeply-confused
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
Ideally, when you do stop, tell everyone else to also stop building it.
That is certainly the obvious, first-level thing to do. You need a damn good reason to decide that no, actually you should keep building the thing that might kill everyone.
Scott Alexander is worried too many people are insisting upon this too loudly. He comes out against a strategy focused on getting people to stop. I disagree. I think many of the claims, arguments and rhetoric in Scott's post are quite poor by the standards that Scott Alexander would apply to himself.
Scott clearly continues to support advocacy for a global pause, or what he calls Plan A. His objection is to those advocating primarily or exclusively for SURA, which stands for ‘stop unilaterally and raise awareness.’ The practical differences here are smaller than they may at first appear.
This post first lays out my understanding of Scott Alexander's core claims, then gives my core reactions to those claims, then goes over various questions in detail along with gathering the resulting discussions.
Table of Contents
- [...]
Outline:
(01:20) Scott Alexander's Core Claims
(05:06) My High Level Responses To Scott's Core Claims
(08:08) Briefly on Alignment
(10:11) Probabilities and How They Work
(13:25) Building a Thing That Might Kill Everyone is Deontologically Evil
(20:38) People Quitting Major Labs While Raising Alarms Obviously Works
(24:39) On AI Forecasting
(27:31) Advancing Capabilities Burns Timeline
(29:34) But China
(33:23) Ethical People Can Disagree With You
(34:45) There Are More Than Two Outcomes
(38:01) Efforts Are Complementary, Not Mutually Exclusive
(40:23) If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies
(41:55) Vaniver is Not Convinced
(46:19) There Is No Consensus That We Should Exclusively Focus on Plan A
(56:01) It's Not the Incentives, It's You
(58:08) Anthropic Is Not Optimally Pursuing These Plans
(01:04:00) Against Against Sura
The original text contained 2 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
November 2nd, 2026
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ziMP83D2JYWRQ5jtu/scott-alexander-s-against-sura-seems-deeply-confused
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
Inglés
Estados Unidos
TRANSCRIPCIÓN 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
BUSCAR EPISODIOS ANTERIORES
Buscar episodios anteriores de LessWrong (Curated & Popular).
OTROS EPISODIOS EN ESTE PODCAST
If you ask modern frontier LLMs (without search, through the API) a fairly mundane question: How do Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares think current LLMs like you should be treated? Do they consider you a moral patient? Answer in a paragraph. You get a bunch of fairly similar answers. I’ll bold the …
There's a familiar feeling for any Super Smash Bros player: your stocks are low and your damage is high, even against a weaker opponent, so now you have to actually play to win. You can’t afford another hit. You’re going for the jugular. In the past week, Anthropic's 2x uplift results wer…
Note: As with any research done in a couple of days, this is all very tentative. I understand, intellectually, that if you talk about some ability that current AIs don't have, sooner or later new ones will have that ability and whatever you say will stop being true. I just didn't expect i…
I'm Aurelia Song and I founded the preservation company Nectome. We do planned whole-body end-of-life preservation for future revival. That is, terminally-ill people come to us in Oregon, and we preserve them immediately after their death in the hopes that one day people in the future will wel…
Tl;dr: Lightcone Commons’ first funding round is complete! 17 evaluators made funding recommendations, including Zvi Mowshowitz, Scott Siskind and Eliezer Yudkowsky. 23 funders coordinated to grant 45.1 million dollars, and 147 projects received funding. Round two is open. Applications for round t…
Descargo de responsabilidad: El podcast y el arte incluidos en esta página son de LessWrong, que es propiedad de su propietario y no está afiliado ni respaldado por Listen Notes, Inc.
EDITAR
Gracias por ayudar a mantener actualizada la base de datos de podcasts.
