02. Campaigning, intergenerational, intersectional climate activism - Jonathon Porritt CBE, Co-founder of Forum for the Future

WEBVTT
00:01:59.206 --> 00:02:02.025
Some people that are youth might not know your illustrious career.
00:02:02.025 --> 00:02:02.296
Right?
00:02:02.296 --> 00:02:04.396
Like you never know.
00:02:05.066 --> 00:02:05.506
Discovering you.
00:02:05.536 --> 00:02:10.695
Well, I think looking at the intersectional nature of what we need to do, like a lot of young people are joining the movement.
00:02:11.116 --> 00:02:11.205
Yes.
00:02:11.205 --> 00:02:12.915
And they're thinking, what do we do?
00:02:12.915 --> 00:02:13.395
What can we do?
00:02:13.401 --> 00:02:18.225
But actually people like yourself have been there for quite some time being like, yeah, we're doing this, we're doing this.
00:02:18.225 --> 00:02:21.466
And actually it's about bringing their youthful energy into Yeah.
00:02:21.765 --> 00:02:23.626
Insight and the knowledge that you already have and you write.
00:02:24.390 --> 00:02:36.181
Uh, in sexuality and youth, don't you in your I certainly do intergenerational justice and intersectionality, getting people to understand you can't just address the climate emergency in itself.
00:02:36.181 --> 00:02:38.191
You have to think about it much more deeply.
00:02:38.700 --> 00:02:38.760
Yeah.
00:02:38.760 --> 00:02:41.790
In terms of society and how we live together and all the rest of it.
00:02:42.181 --> 00:02:48.420
And there are a lot of people there, what I call them climate geeks who just think narrow focus, climate story.
00:02:48.420 --> 00:02:49.260
It's not like that.
00:02:49.260 --> 00:02:53.431
It's, yeah, it's a very different tapestry of.
00:02:54.420 --> 00:02:55.830
we have to weave together.
00:02:56.161 --> 00:02:56.941
I love that.
00:02:56.941 --> 00:03:00.031
I met someone recently that talked about patchwork of solutions.
00:03:00.061 --> 00:03:00.390
Yeah.
00:03:00.781 --> 00:03:04.561
I love that idea of like, everyone's got their bit and they can bring their bits together.
00:03:04.830 --> 00:03:05.461
So I feel like.
00:03:06.045 --> 00:03:09.795
I know and love you, and I have the pleasure of, um, knowing a little bit about your career.
00:03:10.126 --> 00:03:16.306
Um, maybe you might like to give a small introduction to yourself so people Yeah.
00:03:16.635 --> 00:03:16.996
Yeah.
00:03:17.056 --> 00:03:28.485
Well, I, I, I strapped lucky in as much as I read a couple really brilliant books about this stuff back in 1972, limits to Growth and Blueprint for Survival, and that kind of set me on my path.
00:03:28.695 --> 00:03:33.675
Joined the Green Party in 74, spent 10 years in the Green Party while I was a teacher.
00:03:34.156 --> 00:03:34.366
Yes.
00:03:35.251 --> 00:03:37.230
Big comprehensive school in West London.
00:03:37.741 --> 00:03:50.100
Um, then went to Friends of the Earth, then went to the Earth Summit, uh, in 1992, saw all these world leaders and big business people and you know, spiritual leaders, everybody coming together.
00:03:50.431 --> 00:03:51.871
And I thought, okay, this is it.
00:03:51.871 --> 00:03:53.100
This is where we start at.
00:03:53.100 --> 00:03:58.651
Long last, they, I, I was saying at long last, even in 1992.
00:03:58.651 --> 00:04:02.281
Okay, so Anyway, I felt.
00:04:03.480 --> 00:04:11.491
Fired up by that and came back and got involved in setting up forms for the future and the Prince of Wales' Business and Sustainability program.
00:04:11.491 --> 00:04:18.690
All of these different initiatives, which, which happily are still making their contribution to the world we live in now.
00:04:18.690 --> 00:04:24.240
But the focus has been on solutions really now since 1992.
00:04:24.271 --> 00:04:29.971
It's been 30 years of trying to bang the drum for, if you can think positively about the solutions, push them forward.
00:04:30.675 --> 00:04:34.696
The many barriers that are still in the way can be removed.
00:04:35.055 --> 00:04:35.206
Yeah.
00:04:35.206 --> 00:04:39.365
Because you are putting your ideas into that space positively.
00:04:39.435 --> 00:04:44.985
You're not just campaigning negatively and angrily about all the things that have gone wrong.
00:04:44.985 --> 00:04:50.865
You are always trying to put that positive energy in as a substitute for the things that are going wrong.
00:04:51.901 --> 00:04:53.521
I think there's been a shift change as well.
00:04:53.581 --> 00:05:04.290
I think you've been in the last two years, I mean you will have noticed probably many shift changes over the time of your career, but I think in the last two years we've seen a huge amount of hiring happening across loads of different organizations and business.
00:05:04.651 --> 00:05:10.081
Huge amounts of business leadership, I think where perhaps that was lacking and a lot of other citizen leadership.
00:05:10.081 --> 00:05:17.641
You mentioned the need for civil disobedience as being part of your, like what, I think you mentioned three levers, I think, or three focus.
00:05:18.771 --> 00:05:19.040
Yeah.
00:05:19.310 --> 00:05:21.980
And how do you think that's, has, do you think that's changed the narrative?
00:05:21.980 --> 00:05:23.240
How do you think that's changed the narrative?
00:05:23.240 --> 00:05:29.300
Has it, has it brought people's awareness more to things and, and what would come after that if, cause it's not the whole solution, right?
00:05:29.985 --> 00:05:41.985
Yeah, I mean it remains pretty controversial and obviously we've had a wave of new style protest with, um, Britain and just stop oil that has polarized opinions about the role.
00:05:42.255 --> 00:05:44.086
Yeah, that's of civil disobedience.
00:05:44.505 --> 00:05:51.776
Um, I think for me it's very clear we're not gonna get to the place where we need to be without a lot more civil dis.
00:05:52.290 --> 00:05:53.790
I just don't see it happen.
00:05:53.790 --> 00:05:59.850
I don't see the, the mindset of our politicians moving fast enough to get us to that point.
00:05:59.850 --> 00:06:06.331
So we're gonna need a lot of additional, I suppose you'd call it aggressive.
00:06:06.946 --> 00:06:07.545
Politics.
00:06:07.545 --> 00:06:13.036
I don't mean aggressive as in violence, but I mean clearly stated, uncompromising.
00:06:13.456 --> 00:06:16.185
Reminding people of personal responsibility.
00:06:16.305 --> 00:06:16.795
Yeah.
00:06:16.800 --> 00:06:21.526
Across generations and in their own communities and being very outspoken about that.
00:06:21.826 --> 00:06:27.105
And not kind of hoodwinked by the wretched level of greenwash that we get today.
00:06:27.105 --> 00:06:28.636
Cuz greenwash is everywhere.
00:06:28.636 --> 00:06:29.716
Everybody is doing.
00:06:30.360 --> 00:06:32.040
Well, greenwash has gone exponential.
00:06:32.880 --> 00:06:33.841
What's gone Exponential.
00:06:33.901 --> 00:06:35.471
Greenwash has gone exponential.
00:06:35.940 --> 00:06:38.581
has, oh, don't, don't do that, Carl.
00:06:38.581 --> 00:06:40.740
That's not, that's not good news, as you know.
00:06:41.430 --> 00:06:47.040
But what I love about, about just oil and I, I'm supporting them and I know they've caused a lot of disruption.
00:06:47.040 --> 00:06:48.571
They've made a lot of people very grumpy.
00:06:48.961 --> 00:06:53.401
But the truth is, have an extremely simple objective.
00:06:53.610 --> 00:06:58.211
And the objective is that the UK government should stop lying.
00:06:59.110 --> 00:07:09.016
about its readiness to address climate change by canceling these new licenses they're gonna bring forward for oil and gas extraction in the North Sea.
00:07:09.016 --> 00:07:16.336
You cannot go on having, it says, we care passionately about climate change and doing more than most countries in the world.
00:07:16.456 --> 00:07:18.706
But hey Presta, look at what we're doing here in the North Sea.
00:07:19.036 --> 00:07:22.276
A hundred new licenses for new development of oil and gas.
00:07:22.725 --> 00:07:25.466
So just stop oil, very clear campaigning.
00:07:25.545 --> 00:07:25.875
Go.
00:07:26.355 --> 00:07:27.975
Just deal with that hypocrisy.
00:07:28.951 --> 00:07:31.711
And then we can get on and think about some of these other things.
00:07:32.221 --> 00:07:32.310
Yeah.
00:07:32.310 --> 00:07:33.240
I love the aims of it.
00:07:33.240 --> 00:07:48.031
I wonder if, I wonder if the methodo, I wonder how much the methodology does to win the hearts and minds of the next group of people beyond what still is perhaps the early, the early adopters into a little bit of the early majority.
00:07:48.031 --> 00:07:48.240
Right?
00:07:48.240 --> 00:07:57.750
I wonder whether, whether we, if we need them, and B, whether it wins like I want, at what point do you need to make a more constructive form?
00:07:58.411 --> 00:07:59.401
Well, you need all of that.
00:07:59.430 --> 00:08:00.810
You, uh, just stop.
00:08:00.810 --> 00:08:07.980
Oil is not the answer to the inertia that we face in society, but it's part of the response to that.
00:08:08.221 --> 00:08:14.880
And sure they're alienating a lot of people, but quite honestly, it's probably not a bad thing.
00:08:15.540 --> 00:08:18.841
I've been very conscious of the analogy that's going on now around.
00:08:20.326 --> 00:08:27.045
Women's suffrage movement at the start of the 20th century, literally a hundred years ago when you have many of the same debates.
00:08:27.045 --> 00:08:35.326
When Em, Emily Panko sets up the women's Social and Political Union the suffragette, and begins to launch this campaign of direct action.
00:08:35.941 --> 00:08:36.846
which doesn't get anywhere.
00:08:36.846 --> 00:08:38.645
And then they launch a campaign of violence.
00:08:38.645 --> 00:08:56.525
Now, I'm not saying that's what the climate movement should be doing here, but they launch a campaign of violence, which starts by breaking people's windows and then they go further and they start fire bombing letter boxes and railway stations and putting bombs in places and, and of course the suffragettes got massive push.
00:08:57.696 --> 00:09:11.941
including pushback from a lot of women who said women and from the state, of course, politicians using violence, claiming that this was a just war against oppressive male domination.
00:09:12.750 --> 00:09:14.941
Clearly made a lot of people very uncomfortable.
00:09:15.000 --> 00:09:20.296
But Emily Pant said to one of her friends who, Kept on saying, you're making me very uncomfortable.
00:09:20.296 --> 00:09:27.706
She said to her friend, I'm glad you are uncomfortable because you being comfortable never got us anywhere did it.
00:09:28.125 --> 00:09:29.836
And don't forget the suffrage movement.
00:09:30.255 --> 00:09:30.346
Yeah.
00:09:30.375 --> 00:09:38.985
By 1913 was already 30, if not 40 years old, and they'd been fighting for women's suffrage for 30 years.
00:09:39.405 --> 00:09:39.556
No.
00:09:39.826 --> 00:09:46.140
So look, I'm, all I'm saying is that, uh, for me, civil disobedience, Is part of a spectrum Yeah.
00:09:46.140 --> 00:09:48.900
Of responses to what we're doing and an important part of it.
00:09:48.900 --> 00:09:53.971
And I think we should be, personally, I'm full of admiration for what those campaigners are doing.
00:09:53.971 --> 00:09:57.961
They're brave, they're outspoken, they have total integrity in my opinion.
00:09:58.321 --> 00:10:01.081
They're not attention seekers as people try and make out.
00:10:01.081 --> 00:10:02.730
They're really doing what they think is right.
00:10:03.360 --> 00:10:03.571
Yeah.
00:10:03.576 --> 00:10:04.650
And vulnerable.
00:10:04.650 --> 00:10:08.671
And I think I really sup, I really support the peop their intentions and what they're doing.
00:10:08.671 --> 00:10:09.270
Absolutely.
00:10:09.510 --> 00:10:11.010
It's been interesting to in, to.
00:10:12.030 --> 00:10:18.630
You know, being in the thick of the group of people that are working proactively within organizations or, or, or wherever to work on these challenges.
00:10:18.850 --> 00:10:20.461
Yeah, it's been interesting to notice.
00:10:20.461 --> 00:10:34.500
I think there's a couple of points, so certainly after xr, how many people that were working as in, I guess would call them professionals, but that were part of xr or went part to be part of that movement, either as, as with their endorsement of their organization or, or on their own.
00:10:34.500 --> 00:10:36.571
But actually what happened after that?
00:10:37.110 --> 00:10:48.510
was, they had so much more ability to get things across the line and they had so much more ability to get a, a attention from people within their business to do things that they could then practically implement.
00:10:48.515 --> 00:10:56.041
You know, so maybe they were going for clean energy or maybe they were going for, I don't know, scope three, whatever they were going for, they then had this sort of more permission.
00:10:56.041 --> 00:11:09.525
I think there was a moment where they had a lot more, and I think now people are asking the question, but I think particularly around the arts and protests, because I think that's, Two quite, there's two quite controversial things there and it's interesting when they're coupled together.
00:11:10.245 --> 00:11:13.635
And so there are people having conversations about, about that element of it.
00:11:13.640 --> 00:11:21.436
And I, for me, I feel like there is a moment where, uh, I guess industry needs to stand up themselves, right?
00:11:21.436 --> 00:11:28.426
We, if we feel like other people are leading in a way that feels uncomfortable and that's great and we need that, then we also need to stand up and lead in another way.
00:11:28.426 --> 00:11:36.196
And I feel myself included, for a long time it's been quite difficult for, cuz we're all quite humble, I think, that we're in sustainability.
00:11:36.645 --> 00:11:43.485
So to stand up and for us to lead, I think as well is an interesting, like, if we can see a better way, and I've started to see a lot more of that happen.
00:11:44.071 --> 00:11:53.370
But I think that's also, I think something that we'd like to say, but I think a lot, I agree with you, Carl, and the standing up bit that you are referring to has been going on.
00:11:54.211 --> 00:11:54.900
It has, yeah.
00:11:54.900 --> 00:11:55.610
And more.
00:11:55.615 --> 00:11:57.630
More in some sectors than other sectors.
00:11:57.780 --> 00:11:57.900
Yeah.
00:11:57.931 --> 00:12:08.850
But you know, for me, I, as you mentioned, I want to hear business leaders stand up and speak out because they often are doing good stuff, but they don't particularly want to make a noise about it.
00:12:08.880 --> 00:12:10.081
I want to hear more from.
00:12:10.740 --> 00:12:12.931
Teachers and educators, for instance.
00:12:13.051 --> 00:12:20.760
Uh, I, you know, I spent the last 10 years of my life as chancellor of a, a University Keel University here in the uk, and I loved it.
00:12:21.240 --> 00:12:31.201
But when I looked at the sector as a whole, they were hardly on the front line of encouraging young people in universities to become better informed, more.
00:12:32.341 --> 00:12:33.811
Engaged in their communities.
00:12:33.870 --> 00:12:37.951
They, they were playing, I would call it pretty much a laggards role in all honesty.
00:12:38.221 --> 00:12:51.181
Uh, Keeley University was doing a fantastic job, but I was looking at the, the sector as a whole, and then you've got young people to take into account and because of the covid years, an awful lot of people have forgotten just how influential.
00:12:52.260 --> 00:12:57.660
it was when young people began to make their voices heard back in 2019.
00:12:57.660 --> 00:13:02.791
It was massive, absolutely massive, and it had a huge impact on on government.
00:13:02.850 --> 00:13:09.270
The UK government, for better or worse, became the first government in the world to have a statutory legislated target.
00:13:09.630 --> 00:13:11.280
Yep, for net zero by 2050.
00:13:11.640 --> 00:13:15.380
And I can tell you what young people were doing in 2019.
00:13:16.380 --> 00:13:28.110
Played a huge part in that, so we should be mindful of how this standing up and speaking out can impact differently on different parts of the system, depending on conditions.
00:13:29.100 --> 00:13:30.120
Yeah, that feels true.
00:13:31.230 --> 00:13:37.201
I've also really noticed this wasn't the case before, so previously.
00:13:38.041 --> 00:13:40.171
So within the context of people standing up.
00:13:40.620 --> 00:13:46.110
So previously what might happen is people might be sensitive to where their money came from, so they might not stand up so quickly, you know?
00:13:46.171 --> 00:13:50.370
And so they might not say, oh, I wish my company would do this, or we could do this better.
00:13:50.701 --> 00:13:51.780
I've noticed a real.
00:13:53.701 --> 00:14:06.571
Increase of the level of transparency and bravery around people, acknowledging that they're on a journey and being open about that journey and almost often being transparent about where they are on that journey in and as humans, which I think has been a huge step change actually.
00:14:06.571 --> 00:14:08.640
And I think it's, yeah, it's that.
00:14:09.390 --> 00:14:14.400
Because there really needs to be a, going beyond the case studies, which we've certainly seen in the future Planet community and in other spaces as well.
00:14:14.400 --> 00:14:28.321
But it's one really needs to be honest about the challenges that one's facing and then look at those in a very, I guess, almost vulnerable way and give oneself permission to not be in a good place and to be able to say, hang on, we've highlighted this challenge, you know?
00:14:30.230 --> 00:14:35.910
But in the future, planet community, are you talking about some of the blockers, for instance?
00:14:35.910 --> 00:14:38.551
Are you talking about some of the incumbent.
00:14:39.150 --> 00:14:45.301
Companies and industries which are partly responsible for us not making the progress that we ought to be making.
00:14:45.900 --> 00:14:47.850
Would you like to talk more about what those blockers are?
00:14:50.941 --> 00:14:58.020
Well, there are people who represent much of the accumulated wealth and power from the last a hundred years.
00:14:58.201 --> 00:15:08.160
I call them the incumbency, and they have become so influential because of course politicians defer to them and they are very often in in other countries as well.
00:15:09.441 --> 00:15:11.010
Dependent on them for financial support.
00:15:11.431 --> 00:15:20.821
So in America, big oil, big pharma, big mining, big ag intensive agriculture operations, they basically own politicians.
00:15:20.910 --> 00:15:23.120
And it's legal, it's, it's all above board.
00:15:23.120 --> 00:15:23.961
Everybody knows how much.
00:15:24.510 --> 00:15:29.221
Money these politicians are getting from these very big, very powerful companies.
00:15:29.910 --> 00:15:38.160
So the politicians very rarely do what they know they should be doing, cuz they're still looking back to the people who provide the payroll for their offices and their campaigns.
00:15:38.791 --> 00:15:48.510
And for me, I've become less and less tolerant about the bullshit that you hear from those incumbent interests because it's, it's malign, it's genuinely evil.
00:15:48.760 --> 00:15:49.250
Yeah.
00:15:49.255 --> 00:15:53.701
And if you talk about big oil in particular, everybody working for an oil gas company.
00:15:55.201 --> 00:16:05.326
They know what their companies and their products are doing to the prospects for humankind right now, and of course in the future.
00:16:05.535 --> 00:16:16.035
So how they square it with themselves every morning when they get up out of bed and look at themselves in the mirror and think to themselves, well, this is a wonderful, gainful, highly responsible company and work that I'm doing.
00:16:16.035 --> 00:16:19.785
But in reality, of course, what they're doing is trashing life on earth.
00:16:20.625 --> 00:16:22.395
Yeah, I think that's true.
00:16:22.666 --> 00:16:23.596
I also feel like.
00:16:24.135 --> 00:16:27.015
We in ourselves are lying if we don't think we're complicit in that.
00:16:27.015 --> 00:16:31.905
Like I feel like it's, I, I think pointing just at big oil doesn't really work.
00:16:31.910 --> 00:16:34.576
Like it's so entrenched in everything that we would use or do.
00:16:34.905 --> 00:16:36.676
I wonder if I have seen recently.
00:16:37.456 --> 00:16:40.186
And, and I guess in saying that, I think we all need to take responsibility, right?
00:16:40.186 --> 00:16:56.775
I don't think it's, I think in a way, if we use, what about when we point to oil, we're effectively avoiding doing the thing that we need to do, which is make sure that we've got renewable energy in our supply chain factories or whatever the level, whatever, whatever those particular challenges that we need to solve are, it can, it's not either or you.
00:16:56.975 --> 00:16:58.535
It's, I totally agree.
00:16:58.535 --> 00:16:59.216
Totally agree.
00:16:59.385 --> 00:17:00.285
You, you need to.
00:17:01.576 --> 00:17:06.195
Absolutely rigorous in the analysis of why we are not making that faster progress.
00:17:06.195 --> 00:17:17.205
Because if you're not rigorous in the analysis, when you come up with advice to people about what needs to happen, that advice won't be as attuned to reality as it needs to be.
00:17:17.211 --> 00:17:29.175
That's the only reason why I'm pressing the point about rigor in analysis, because the prescription for doing things better depends on being absolutely honest about the situation we find ourselves.
00:17:29.800 --> 00:17:30.671
Uncomfortable.
00:17:30.675 --> 00:17:32.020
Though it might be.
00:17:32.711 --> 00:17:33.161
It's not.
00:17:33.161 --> 00:17:37.181
I would not, I've, it doesn't feel that uncomfortable for me.
00:17:37.181 --> 00:17:48.876
It feels like it's just a set of challenges I was thinking about, I mean, obviously it should feel uncomfortable, but I, I was thinking about, the more that I look at it, the more that I feel like you unlock systems change through being systematic.
00:17:50.076 --> 00:17:54.382
and what, and this might not be the only way to do, right, but there might be other parts to it.
00:17:54.382 --> 00:17:55.872
But for example, if we think about.
00:17:56.317 --> 00:18:02.767
The challenge of renewable energy in the manufacturing supply chain and the the business might not own its factories.
00:18:02.767 --> 00:18:08.376
So suddenly you've got this challenge where even if you're a mid-size or large SM e, you probably are not owning.
00:18:08.436 --> 00:18:11.586
You're not owning your own factories and now multiple people using those factories.
00:18:12.037 --> 00:18:17.977
So the challenge of getting renewable energy into your supply chain in India or Vietnam or wherever it might be in.
00:18:19.027 --> 00:18:24.817
Is a challenge of collaboration where you've gotta take the time to go and build those different relationships, those different people.
00:18:25.237 --> 00:18:32.797
That brings back to a challenge of a sustainability person who's got like a myriad of things that they're doing and they're under-resourced, and therefore how are they gonna build that?
00:18:33.517 --> 00:18:37.807
How are they gonna build that collaboration to then unlock that particular piece of the puzzle?
00:18:37.987 --> 00:18:45.696
So I think it, the more I look at it, the more I think that you need a template for doing that at scale to get to the point where you can.
00:18:46.477 --> 00:18:50.826
Try and affect policy and regulation because I haven't seen regulation and policy.
00:18:51.186 --> 00:19:10.686
I might, I probably don't know enough, but I haven't seen it working extremely well, even in instances where, um, this is where I'd love to receive your knowledge on it, but even in instances where there's a, if, for example, in d r s deposit, respe return scheme in the uk, it's taking so long to get that across the line, right?
00:19:10.686 --> 00:19:11.646
Like, yeah.
00:19:12.916 --> 00:19:21.172
what are you seeing that's working in that space and like, what, you know, could you add more to perhaps that like, line of thought, like what has your been your experience at Forum or in other areas?
00:19:21.172 --> 00:19:22.162
Like, how do we unlock?
00:19:22.882 --> 00:19:28.791
Because it's very easy to say, oh, well this is the problem, but that feels, what feels difficult about that is it's so challenging.
00:19:29.061 --> 00:19:30.531
How do you change politics, right?
00:19:30.537 --> 00:19:31.672
Like, that's challenging.
00:19:31.882 --> 00:19:33.051
So how do we get those?
00:19:33.051 --> 00:19:34.842
I'm, I'm interested in like, what are the.
00:19:36.561 --> 00:19:37.011
Yeah.
00:19:37.912 --> 00:19:38.721
And it's messy.
00:19:38.842 --> 00:19:39.592
Always messy.
00:19:39.592 --> 00:19:46.102
That's messy but you have to have the right kind of market framing for these things to work.
00:19:46.102 --> 00:19:53.092
So one out out success story for us in the UK and now increasingly for the world is offshore wind.
00:19:53.721 --> 00:19:54.051
Yeah.
00:19:54.172 --> 00:20:04.311
We happen to have a regulatory system and a government policy that drove investment into offshore wind quite early on before it had really establi.
00:20:05.317 --> 00:20:08.467
The viability of the industry at the scale it's now operating at.
00:20:08.707 --> 00:20:08.916
Yeah.
00:20:09.017 --> 00:20:12.936
And the consequence, a lot of that painful learning was done quickly.
00:20:12.967 --> 00:20:13.596
Yeah, yeah.
00:20:13.926 --> 00:20:20.106
And we now have a world beating offshore industry, which many other countries are emulating.
00:20:20.946 --> 00:20:27.247
That's an example of success where the private sector can use the existing regulatory framework to.
00:20:28.686 --> 00:20:29.797
Huge new investments.
00:20:29.797 --> 00:20:34.596
I mean, we're talking, you know, tens of billions of dollars now in this country and around the world.
00:20:35.106 --> 00:20:45.636
A less good example is you can sometimes get a government that sets a target, which sounds wonderfully ambitious, but then it doesn't do anything to make that target a deliverable.
00:20:45.666 --> 00:20:53.826
So we have a target for there to be no new set sales of ele, of petrol and diesel vehicles in this country by 2030.
00:20:54.592 --> 00:20:58.162
No new sales, but the government's done practically nothing.
00:20:58.612 --> 00:20:58.882
Yeah.
00:20:58.942 --> 00:21:03.501
To actually affect the way in which that target will be achieved.
00:21:03.592 --> 00:21:09.082
So we haven't built any of our big battery factories that we need to do.
00:21:09.086 --> 00:21:16.582
The only one that is actually had government approval hasn't even started construction yet, and may well fold because the finances are so dodgy.
00:21:16.582 --> 00:21:17.031
There are.
00:21:18.951 --> 00:21:21.412
Big, they're called giga factories.
00:21:21.652 --> 00:21:29.842
I think that's the Elon Musk influence personally, but 20 Elon, Elon Musk style giga factories of batteries being built in Europe now.
00:21:30.412 --> 00:21:30.531
Right?
00:21:30.531 --> 00:21:35.376
So those countries have absolutely seized this story and said, okay, you wanna get rid of petrol diesel vehicles?
00:21:36.892 --> 00:21:38.682
EVs have gotta be as cheap, if not cheaper.
00:21:38.801 --> 00:21:44.061
We've gotta have the infrastructure throughout our country to make it work so that people don't.
00:21:44.826 --> 00:21:48.426
Uncomfortable, insecure in their use of an electric vehicle.
00:21:48.606 --> 00:21:55.717
And we're gonna drive this now using a combination of state intervention and funding and private sector investment.
00:21:57.247 --> 00:22:05.017
Do you think it's, um, Well, I dunno why I mentioned that example.
00:22:05.017 --> 00:22:09.906
Cause I'm less keen on the EV revolution than an awful That's, yeah, that's a separate conversation, right?
00:22:09.906 --> 00:22:11.257
That's a separate conversation.
00:22:11.257 --> 00:22:11.676
Exactly.
00:22:11.676 --> 00:22:14.676
Well, I mean, we can have it in a moment, but do you think the state knows what to fund?
00:22:14.722 --> 00:22:15.472
Sometimes, yeah.
00:22:15.742 --> 00:22:17.002
I mean not, not always.
00:22:17.008 --> 00:22:23.393
I mean, we, we live in one of those sad countries which still think nuclear power is worth putting a lot of government money into.
00:22:23.932 --> 00:22:24.323
Yeah.
00:22:24.772 --> 00:22:28.673
You know, and we'll, we're getting one new power station built now.
00:22:28.853 --> 00:22:33.083
Henley Point, Somerset, and government says it's gonna get another one built at Sizewell in Suffolk.
00:22:33.654 --> 00:22:40.255
solar, onshore wind, offshore wind, massive investment in energy efficiency, storage and changing the grid.
00:22:40.375 --> 00:22:41.424
Those are the six things.
00:22:41.484 --> 00:22:46.644
That's where you get value for money and you get it within a very short period of time.
00:22:47.125 --> 00:22:47.454
Yeah.
00:22:48.805 --> 00:22:49.855
Could you go through this again?
00:22:51.339 --> 00:22:51.789
Solar.
00:22:52.150 --> 00:22:52.390
Yep.
00:22:53.200 --> 00:22:53.829
Onshore wind.
00:22:54.220 --> 00:22:54.519
Yep.
00:22:54.880 --> 00:22:57.759
Because that's cheapest way of getting renewable electricity.
00:22:58.089 --> 00:22:58.210
Yeah.
00:22:58.210 --> 00:22:58.779
Offshore wind.
00:23:00.490 --> 00:23:08.680
Essential energy efficiency in everything we do, particularly in our homes where we live, cuz we have really wretched housing stock in this country.
00:23:09.279 --> 00:23:09.940
Storage.
00:23:10.029 --> 00:23:12.160
Cuz you can't really Yeah.
00:23:12.200 --> 00:23:16.180
Get the full benefit of renewables without storage and then rethinking.
00:23:17.140 --> 00:23:21.039
Because obviously the grid of the future looks very different from the grid of the past.
00:23:21.369 --> 00:23:21.579
Yep.
00:23:21.609 --> 00:23:28.509
And, and I'm not saying that's the answer to everything, but boy, I tell you those six things that'll get us a long way there.
00:23:28.509 --> 00:23:28.750
Right?
00:23:29.170 --> 00:23:29.829
Exactly.
00:23:30.190 --> 00:23:30.460
Yeah.
00:23:30.460 --> 00:23:33.160
So we've looked at, I guess, politics as being a blocker.
00:23:33.164 --> 00:23:36.640
What are some of the other blockers that you see and how would be them?
00:23:38.710 --> 00:23:45.250
Well, I'm gonna say something, which is probably not what most people talking about these things.
00:23:46.765 --> 00:23:51.444
Would expect, but a blocker for me is the indifference of very large numbers of people.
00:23:52.015 --> 00:23:52.404
Yeah.
00:23:53.275 --> 00:24:03.744
And I don't want to get into a kind of pollyannaish, everybody's worried about this now and everybody who's in a position to do something about it is doing something about it cuz it's just not true.
00:24:03.805 --> 00:24:12.924
There are millions of indifferent citizens here in the UK and in most rich world countries who really don't want to have their way of.
00:24:14.605 --> 00:24:17.065
Changed are comfortable with what they've got.
00:24:17.335 --> 00:24:30.444
Even though they're a bit worried about what it looks like now, they don't feel the same level of compassion and solidarity with people in the poor world, as I think is gonna be required as the climate emergency hits.
00:24:31.015 --> 00:24:36.714
And essentially they're just waiting around for something to happen without taking responsibility themselves.
00:24:37.134 --> 00:24:39.924
So for me, I get a little bit angry when.
00:24:41.454 --> 00:24:49.464
Just put all the blame on business or put all the blame on government or stick all the blame on somewhere else, investors or banks or whatever it might be.
00:24:49.464 --> 00:24:56.904
We have to look at ourselves and say, well, are we really playing the part that we need to play in this change process?
00:24:57.464 --> 00:24:59.484
Do two things that arrives to me there.
00:24:59.785 --> 00:25:01.134
One is, do we need everyone?
00:25:01.134 --> 00:25:02.035
And we can talk about that.
00:25:02.035 --> 00:25:04.075
But the other is do people know what to do?
00:25:05.244 --> 00:25:06.045
Do they, well, we don't.
00:25:06.134 --> 00:25:06.805
We don't need.
00:25:07.839 --> 00:25:09.730
Um, because if, yeah, yeah.
00:25:09.789 --> 00:25:11.799
Nothing would ever change if we needed ev everyone.
00:25:11.859 --> 00:25:11.920
Yeah.
00:25:12.000 --> 00:25:14.019
But we need, we need more than we've got at the moment.
00:25:14.079 --> 00:25:15.069
We need more than we've got.
00:25:15.069 --> 00:25:15.220
Yeah.
00:25:15.220 --> 00:25:16.240
We need more than we've got.
00:25:16.329 --> 00:25:17.619
And it's going that way.
00:25:17.625 --> 00:25:24.279
Like if I think about the number of overworked sustainability and social impact professionals, then that certainly they need more help.
00:25:24.279 --> 00:25:34.420
And I think that's a, you know, building that their building their support even 2, 3, 4, 5 times wherever they're working would be, would be a fundamental shift change in terms of.
00:25:35.160 --> 00:25:37.470
Cause we don't need that many people there.
00:25:37.829 --> 00:25:41.910
And I think being in more intentional about who you know.
00:25:42.369 --> 00:25:52.329
Going company by company and making sure that they've got people in-house that are trained to do whatever they do, and they've got their support network and they understand the steps that they need to go through, so they don't need to go through the learning.
00:25:52.509 --> 00:25:53.500
There's some learning presses.
00:25:53.505 --> 00:26:00.549
Again, there are some very systematic things that I think that we can do that are probably more bottom up than a top down target that we're receiving.
00:26:00.549 --> 00:26:01.059
Yeah, yeah.
00:26:01.059 --> 00:26:01.299
Yeah.
00:26:01.599 --> 00:26:05.470
So I think in that respect, like we don't need that many people, I don't think.
00:26:05.529 --> 00:26:16.660
And then what you've got for us, when you've got that network, You can be more effective at how you can be proactive in terms of policy, regulation, legislation.
00:26:16.660 --> 00:26:26.559
Cause all at the moment I see happening is you get things highlighted or things shared, but the amount of energy you need is an individual that works in the space to contribute to everything.
00:26:26.559 --> 00:26:30.279
To have a say on everything, to be part of everything, to know about what's happening.
00:26:30.279 --> 00:26:31.990
It's just so much there.
00:26:32.589 --> 00:26:33.339
but actually you don't.
00:26:33.519 --> 00:26:37.930
If we could be more systematic about that, I think we'd probably be a lot further forward.
00:26:37.930 --> 00:26:41.980
And you, you talked about, in your book, you talk about almost like a war effort.
00:26:42.029 --> 00:26:42.509
Yeah.
00:26:42.509 --> 00:26:52.029
You know, I think we, I, I think we've got that collaboration in pockets, but I don't think we've got that in, its sort of openhearted, open, armed, let's all work together.
00:26:52.029 --> 00:26:55.630
Yet I think that's another sort of No, I think you're, I think you're right.
00:26:55.750 --> 00:26:56.440
Absolutely.
00:26:57.009 --> 00:26:57.190
Yeah.
00:26:57.250 --> 00:26:57.910
I think you're right.
00:26:58.809 --> 00:26:59.529
But do you.
00:27:01.059 --> 00:27:04.779
You see, for me, the real measure is speed of change.
00:27:04.779 --> 00:27:15.099
Whether those communities of concerned citizens are actually growing or are they more or less in the same place as they were five or 10 years ago?
00:27:15.099 --> 00:27:22.720
If you talk to all the big supermarkets today, I think they, yeah, they'll always tell you, well, we've got 10 to 15% of our consumers who really care about.
00:27:23.394 --> 00:27:26.335
We've got 10 to 15% consumers who don't give a shit about it.
00:27:26.845 --> 00:27:32.275
We've got an awful lot of people in the middle, which we can reach out to in all sorts of different ways.
00:27:32.484 --> 00:27:38.664
And then Carl, they'll say, and it's been like that for a decade or more, so is it actually moving?
00:27:39.085 --> 00:27:44.515
I love, I love what Jamie Broderick was saying about how many tweets it gets a pension fund to move.
00:27:44.515 --> 00:27:47.994
It was like 13 tweets and a pension fund will pay attention to what you're saying, right?
00:27:48.894 --> 00:27:53.724
like I, and I might have the numbers slightly wrong, but then, but in essence that's sort of, you know, what we're dealing with.
00:27:53.730 --> 00:27:58.615
And I think, so I, I, I don't think it's a lack of, I think yes, you're right.
00:27:58.615 --> 00:28:02.335
There's a lack that a lot of people don't care and that can be sort of disheartening.
00:28:03.984 --> 00:28:04.315
good.
00:28:04.404 --> 00:28:17.365
I'm, I think we have, so I'm not disagreeing with you on that, but I also think that like, I, I think there's a lack of a lack of joined up credible options for people that care to go and have an impact on, because it's complex.
00:28:17.990 --> 00:28:29.785
and it's easy to understand that maybe I should use a water bottle to go to work, or maybe I should change to clean energy, but it's difficult to understand how it can have an impact on policy, especially when it's totally fucking disheartening.
00:28:29.785 --> 00:28:33.744
When you've got government cycles that just mean you lose hope in that process, right?
00:28:33.750 --> 00:28:33.984
Sure.
00:28:34.345 --> 00:28:38.315
That what we live, what we lose, what we've lost is a form.
00:28:39.460 --> 00:28:46.210
Societal or person based organizational structure that people can invest in, that means that they know that change is gonna happen.
00:28:46.599 --> 00:28:47.440
That's what I think.
00:28:47.740 --> 00:28:49.180
So I don't think there's a lack of people.
00:28:49.210 --> 00:28:54.099
I think there's a lack of like, where do we go if we are interested and active?
00:28:54.430 --> 00:28:59.890
And I think a lot more people would join that if they knew they, we had what, how many people join ex extinct billion Millions.
00:28:59.890 --> 00:29:00.130
Right.
00:29:00.130 --> 00:29:03.400
But the, the challenge with Extinction Rebellion is it fell really short.
00:29:03.400 --> 00:29:03.700
There was a.
00:29:04.759 --> 00:29:06.924
after its first reaction, there's nothing next.
00:29:07.154 --> 00:29:07.634
Mm-hmm.
00:29:07.714 --> 00:29:18.755
And then it struggle to find like in, it's, it's a great movement, but it's struggle to find any meaningful connection with really tangible on the ground change.
00:29:19.194 --> 00:29:22.345
For example, it, it struggles to get into organizations as a movement.
00:29:22.345 --> 00:29:31.434
It struggles to get into business as in movement because it's had to do that other thing that, so I, I think I, I'm talking a lot, but I think there is, I think it's more that we.
00:29:32.815 --> 00:29:34.884
We don't have the system for people to engage with.
00:29:38.035 --> 00:29:41.035
Yeah, well you may be right.
00:29:41.065 --> 00:29:50.244
I think I, I'm always astonished that peop so few people actually translate their concern into what it means for the future.
00:29:51.785 --> 00:29:59.890
And I get really cross with politicians who say, Including our new Prime minister, Rishi Sunk, who say Yes.
00:29:59.890 --> 00:30:07.599
The reason why I'm really most concerned about this is cause I've got two young daughters who tell me I really ought to be, and you just say, oh my God.
00:30:08.890 --> 00:30:10.029
Utter, utter prat.
00:30:10.450 --> 00:30:10.900
What?
00:30:11.500 --> 00:30:11.890
Sorry?
00:30:12.400 --> 00:30:13.000
I love that.
00:30:13.000 --> 00:30:13.809
That's my surname.
00:30:13.809 --> 00:30:14.890
I'm absolutely happy.
00:30:14.894 --> 00:30:15.819
I know, I know.
00:30:15.819 --> 00:30:18.910
I said, as I said it, I thought, oh really?
00:30:18.910 --> 00:30:19.539
Jonathan.
00:30:20.109 --> 00:30:20.190
Jonathan.
00:30:20.194 --> 00:30:20.470
I love it.
00:30:20.470 --> 00:30:20.990
It's fun.
00:30:22.509 --> 00:30:23.890
I do apologize for that.
00:30:23.894 --> 00:30:24.759
I really do.
00:30:25.089 --> 00:30:31.960
But it's I could have called him something much worse, but that I think perhaps you could have, yeah, exactly.
00:30:32.930 --> 00:30:33.819
but I hate it.
00:30:34.539 --> 00:30:44.259
I hate it when par when parents sort of say, um, I've come to the conclusion this really matters because my children are telling me this really matters to them, so it's gonna really matter to me.
00:30:44.289 --> 00:30:55.029
And you just think, what have you been doing for the last 20 years when you were having your children and not really paying any attention to the degree to which the world was falling apart around you?
00:30:55.029 --> 00:30:56.890
It's just kind of drives me mad.
00:30:57.309 --> 00:30:58.599
It's also such an easy line.
00:30:58.599 --> 00:31:00.400
It's like, I'm not racist cuz my friends.
00:31:00.400 --> 00:31:00.910
Exactly.
00:31:01.000 --> 00:31:01.900
No, it really.
00:31:02.365 --> 00:31:05.934
It really is an easy line and it, it ought to be banned.
00:31:05.934 --> 00:31:11.305
It's uh, it used to be, I used to get quite crossed by people who'd say, we're doing this for future generations.
00:31:11.515 --> 00:31:14.694
And I'd think, actually, how about doing this for people right now?
00:31:14.815 --> 00:31:17.275
How about sorting out things right now?
00:31:17.454 --> 00:31:21.775
How about sorting out the appalling housing stock in this country?
00:31:21.805 --> 00:31:29.095
Right now we have the first death of a young child attributed to black mold in a house.
00:31:29.454 --> 00:31:30.744
Just earlier this.
00:31:32.244 --> 00:31:42.625
and it just sent ripples through the housing community by saying there are so many people living in absolutely shit accommodation.
00:31:43.105 --> 00:31:50.815
And some of it is so bad it actually reduces their health massively and sometimes even kills people.
00:31:51.654 --> 00:31:56.305
And you know, if that's what we should be doing right now, that's what we should be addressing.
00:31:56.305 --> 00:32:00.025
Because as you address a challenge like that, address fuel poverty.
00:32:00.565 --> 00:32:05.365
Deal with that health issue, you simultaneously get on top of a lot of the climate related.
00:32:05.515 --> 00:32:06.444
That feels really true.
00:32:06.444 --> 00:32:13.704
And actually what advice me is looking at the redistribution of wealth or the equal distribution of wealth, or the more equal distribution of wealth as well.
00:32:14.174 --> 00:32:14.175
Yeah.
00:32:14.634 --> 00:32:19.944
And, um, we've seen de-growth gain some popularity, rightly so.
00:32:20.214 --> 00:32:20.394
Right?
00:32:20.394 --> 00:32:23.154
Like the concept of like, do we need to keep striving for more growth?
00:32:23.994 --> 00:32:27.174
How do you think we can, what are your views on like how we might start.
00:32:28.509 --> 00:32:28.960
Yeah.
00:32:29.230 --> 00:32:35.589
This is a, these are oil tankers of capitalism that require, like, changing Yeah.
00:32:35.589 --> 00:32:38.250
In terms of their whole, both, both literally and metaphoric.
00:32:38.559 --> 00:32:38.950
Yeah.
00:32:38.954 --> 00:32:40.240
Uh, absolutely.
00:32:40.599 --> 00:32:44.619
I, I, well, as you can imagine, I've wrestled with this for a very long time.
00:32:44.619 --> 00:32:51.430
I mean, the, uh, as I mentioned the start, the book, that first one of the books that first got me going, this was Limits to Growth.
00:32:52.880 --> 00:33:01.015
and in 1972 it said if we carry on growing our economies, regardless of the impact of that growth on natural systems, then we will hit a wall.
00:33:01.045 --> 00:33:03.954
We will meet physical.
00:33:04.345 --> 00:33:09.115
Barriers to being able to go on using the earth's natural resources and wealth.
00:33:09.295 --> 00:33:10.914
And sure enough, that's what's happened.
00:33:10.914 --> 00:33:19.855
We've, we've seen that in terms of the build up gas in the atmosphere, collapse of ecosystems, build up a pollutants in our, uh, oceans, et cetera, et cetera.
00:33:19.859 --> 00:33:22.914
So we know that these limits to growth are real.
00:33:22.944 --> 00:33:23.815
We still have a.
00:33:24.220 --> 00:33:28.329
Dominant political system that says growth is the only thing that tells people.
00:33:28.480 --> 00:33:36.549
We're actually progressing still and into that space now, as you said, has come this idea that we don't need more growth.
00:33:36.549 --> 00:33:37.539
We need de-growth.
00:33:37.599 --> 00:33:49.630
Now, the difficulty about the de-growth movement and it constantly has to justify itself in these terms is that it sounds as if it doesn't care about massive levels of poverty in the world.
00:33:50.289 --> 00:33:50.930
That's interesting.
00:33:50.934 --> 00:33:58.299
Poverty in their own countries, and poverty in particular in poorer, emerging and developing economies.
00:33:58.839 --> 00:34:14.590
And what I don't think has emerged yet is a really powerful story about alternatives to the current model of growth that factors in social justice and addressing poverty as the core element in what that alternative would do.
00:34:14.829 --> 00:34:15.329
And you.
00:34:16.284 --> 00:34:18.190
It does mean redistribution.
00:34:18.250 --> 00:34:21.099
It means a focus on social justice.
00:34:21.130 --> 00:34:25.150
It means fairness at every point in the economy, in my opinion.
00:34:25.155 --> 00:34:36.969
Without that, uh, growth economics is always gonna be corrupted and callous because it just dismisses the interest and concerns of sometimes half the population.
00:34:37.000 --> 00:34:40.599
If you think about the UK today, that's so curious.
00:34:40.599 --> 00:34:43.599
Cause we've seen like a growth in the.
00:34:45.070 --> 00:34:56.230
Movement of people having their own farms or their own small holdings, or choosing to not have expensive cars and choosing to just appreciate the balance in life.
00:34:56.230 --> 00:35:04.230
There's so, there's been more than I've seen perhaps, you know, for someone like my father who's seen more than that, they've probably already noticed that happening before.
00:35:04.230 --> 00:35:08.550
But like certainly there's a big change from, you know, where we are, where we have been.
00:35:09.744 --> 00:35:16.945
But then without regulation, I can't see how we would get there without some sort of like leveling of the playing field and also without looking at G D P.
00:35:16.945 --> 00:35:22.465
Because if GDP is the only thing we like, that feels like the, unless that's at the top of the pyramid, right?
00:35:22.465 --> 00:35:24.744
Like gdp, the only thing we measure ourselves on is Yeah.
00:35:24.954 --> 00:35:25.074
Yeah.
00:35:25.344 --> 00:35:26.034
How do we Exactly.
00:35:26.364 --> 00:35:34.284
Like, how does that, like everything else sorely feels like, you know, well different, there have been different approaches to this and I, I can't remember the last.
00:35:35.679 --> 00:35:42.280
Um, but there are many, many alternative ways of measuring prosperity and wellbeing in an economy.
00:35:43.030 --> 00:35:50.530
Human development index, the wellbeing index itself, uh, um, I think of the last count when I wrote capitalism as if the world matters.
00:35:50.530 --> 00:36:01.820
There was something like 15 different metrics, so, you know, systems of measurement, which would give you a very different, a much more realistic picture of how.
00:36:02.335 --> 00:36:06.355
Country was or wasn't doing, rather than just relying on G D P.
00:36:06.804 --> 00:36:14.034
So a lot of work has been done conceptually to come up with better ways of measuring what it is that makes a country successful.
00:36:14.335 --> 00:36:18.625
And we're still stuck with the dominance of G D P.
00:36:18.925 --> 00:36:21.054
Politicians don't really talk about other metrics.
00:36:21.059 --> 00:36:22.824
They still just focus on gdp.
00:36:23.125 --> 00:36:25.344
I don't think they fucking understand it, frankly, often.
00:36:26.034 --> 00:36:28.914
I've, I've, no, I'm not like, I wonder if they.
00:36:30.070 --> 00:36:43.510
Really understand, like, I wonder if you're a politician and has just been a politician all this time, and perhaps this is controversial, I wonder if unless you've been on the ground, unless you've been part of different things, I don't know how you would've received that knowledge to really understand it.
00:36:43.690 --> 00:36:48.909
So someone like Caroline Lucas, I trust to understand like some of the, all of the issues, right?
00:36:48.909 --> 00:36:51.219
But I, I wonder how others will even understand it if.
00:36:52.179 --> 00:36:53.380
I've never been in touch with these.
00:36:53.380 --> 00:36:58.949
Yeah, I mean it's a, it is a, I'm not sure it's that Actually, Carl, I'm Oh, nice.
00:36:58.954 --> 00:36:59.769
Thanks for challenging me.
00:37:00.280 --> 00:37:04.059
I think it's, people are trapped in a growth syndrome.
00:37:05.050 --> 00:37:16.420
The whole lives have been lived with an implicit assumption that if you want to make life better for yourself and for other people, then you need to be contributing to a story about growth.
00:37:17.230 --> 00:37:17.380
Yeah.
00:37:18.099 --> 00:37:19.539
Don't forget when it, okay.
00:37:19.539 --> 00:37:23.019
Liz Truss, in her short-lived period as, uh, Tru Nomics.
00:37:23.019 --> 00:37:25.449
Meister, she was the one who said, growth, growth, growth.
00:37:25.869 --> 00:37:27.429
But remember who said that before?
00:37:27.429 --> 00:37:27.610
Her?
00:37:27.719 --> 00:37:28.159
Kirs.
00:37:28.159 --> 00:37:28.599
Stama.
00:37:28.909 --> 00:37:29.519
Mm-hmm.
00:37:29.860 --> 00:37:34.059
Kirs Stama said The Labor Party now is all about economic growth, growth, growth, growth.
00:37:34.420 --> 00:37:45.280
So you see, even if you're talking about progressive, more, more progressive politicians rather than less progressive politicians, they're all trapped in the growth paradigm cuz it's the only paradigm.
00:37:46.090 --> 00:37:54.460
They've known through their political career and they're, they're not investigating what the alternatives would look like and actually for them, that is good.
00:37:54.489 --> 00:37:55.869
So I was, so it's curious.
00:37:55.869 --> 00:37:59.320
I, I remember meeting three or four people that that ran.
00:38:00.445 --> 00:38:03.744
Coal or power stations in, in, in, in India.
00:38:03.750 --> 00:38:11.034
And for them, they'd lived their whole lives building these great businesses that gave back to their communities, that supported their communities.
00:38:11.364 --> 00:38:17.215
And then were left with this moment where they were like, oh, we now have businesses that are seen as being the wrong kinds of businesses.
00:38:17.219 --> 00:38:25.974
Yet we've lived our whole life doing something that's So, I yeah, I really, I I can appreciate what you're sharing then, but I still, I, I still wonder how do.
00:38:26.994 --> 00:38:30.175
How do we embed, like how do we change that top bit?
00:38:30.204 --> 00:38:35.065
Like how do we embed better indexes within the existence?
00:38:35.065 --> 00:38:42.655
Well, again, I don't wanna bang on about the, the sort of energy efficiency in the housing story, but you've gotta think about co-benefits when you're developing policy.
00:38:42.659 --> 00:38:46.885
You've gotta think about what it is that helps peop, helps improve people's real.
00:38:47.485 --> 00:38:48.235
Quality of life.
00:38:48.235 --> 00:38:50.994
Not a fictional number, but real quality of life.
00:38:51.385 --> 00:38:54.144
And that's where you have to think about community cohesion.
00:38:54.144 --> 00:38:55.525
You have to think about better health.
00:38:55.525 --> 00:39:09.684
You have to think about access to good services in a community, sort of minimum basic public services as part of what it is that makes a nation state really deliver for its citizens.
00:39:09.684 --> 00:39:10.494
You've gotta think about.
00:39:11.695 --> 00:39:15.514
Indicators and when you've got a policy option, so, okay.
00:39:15.519 --> 00:39:31.764
You know, I don't wanna tie it to something quite as specific as the financial crisis here in the uk, but we had a chancellor of the X Checker who in the latest budget said, and we will address energy efficiency in our housing stock in three years time.
00:39:32.394 --> 00:39:34.465
Well, what the hell?
00:39:34.585 --> 00:39:37.344
I mean, this is a crisis right now.
00:39:38.065 --> 00:39:38.394
Yeah.
00:39:38.905 --> 00:39:43.900
So, Sorry, I must keep the frustration outta my voice, but you just hear this.
00:39:43.900 --> 00:39:56.440
Uh, 2019, the Bloody Tory party actually had a manifesto pledge to spend 19 billion pounds on improving the quality of housing stock in this country, 19 billion.
00:39:56.920 --> 00:40:03.219
Very little of that has led to I much improvement for people here in the UK so far.
00:40:03.224 --> 00:40:08.500
That's why I wonder whether this is, this is an this, this is.
00:40:09.739 --> 00:40:10.824
this is one of the challenges, right?
00:40:10.824 --> 00:40:20.034
And I think one of the things that we've perhaps done too much of, even though sometimes it's successful, is put our faith in a political party.
00:40:20.425 --> 00:40:25.014
Cause you go through these sort of cycles of like, like, I'm gonna put my energy into that.
00:40:25.045 --> 00:40:37.934
And then, oh, it's gonna be, and then it's gonna be like, you wait three or four years and you're like, oh no, but it wasn't, and then you sort of, all the time and, and I, and it's, and if you look at that globally, that could happen in any country at any particular time, even.
00:40:38.320 --> 00:40:39.610
There are some exceptions.
00:40:39.789 --> 00:40:42.130
There are some exceptions, but those are not the norm I think.
00:40:42.130 --> 00:40:43.719
I don't think so.
00:40:43.719 --> 00:40:44.139
Wondering.
00:40:44.139 --> 00:40:44.679
Yeah, I agree.
00:40:44.679 --> 00:40:45.280
I agree.
00:40:45.550 --> 00:40:47.320
But yeah.
00:40:47.380 --> 00:40:47.710
Right.
00:40:47.710 --> 00:41:00.849
But equally, We have, we have responsibilities as citizens, and part of those responsibilities are political because if we choose to opt down the political system, then guess what?
00:41:00.849 --> 00:41:03.010
That system is filled by.
00:41:03.010 --> 00:41:03.519
Exactly.
00:41:03.519 --> 00:41:08.139
The kind of self-serving forces that are certainly not doing any favors to anybody else.
00:41:08.199 --> 00:41:10.539
No, I think we need to engage in the political system.
00:41:10.539 --> 00:41:12.610
We need to engage in the financial system.
00:41:12.614 --> 00:41:12.940
We need.
00:41:13.559 --> 00:41:15.900
Places of work we need to engage in our places of home.
00:41:15.905 --> 00:41:18.239
Like I think, you know, we agree on those things.
00:41:18.659 --> 00:41:22.050
I just wonder whether, in fact, I should not shop broadly.
00:41:22.230 --> 00:41:30.840
I would imagine completely agree on those things, but like I, but I wonder whether we need an alternative system that runs alongside the existing system.
00:41:31.489 --> 00:41:37.315
and that we acknowledge that parts of the system are broken, then can't put our faith all in that part of the system.
00:41:37.614 --> 00:41:51.954
But then there's, there must be another way that we can mobilize that goes alongside and it probably is, you know, when you it to sort of bring on what you were saying, it's when we were talking about a tapestry of, of, of, of solutions or patchwork of solutions.
00:41:52.315 --> 00:41:53.605
It's something that's more.
00:41:54.295 --> 00:42:00.085
Like you could have something that worked in freight, for example, or a framework for working in freight that you could then bring into others.
00:42:00.085 --> 00:42:05.574
And I, you've, you've done much of that with forum, but like I'm interested now, how do you connect those dots?
00:42:05.635 --> 00:42:18.385
Like how do we then build more, like how do you build, I'm interested in how you build an alternative system between alternative economic system or political citizen, citizen based system.
00:42:20.016 --> 00:42:22.896
I think it's an important question to explore what you would need.
00:42:23.106 --> 00:42:32.137
At a certain point, we have to accept that it's really difficult to try and shove the better way of doing things into the old way of doing things, cuz it just gets so much resistance.
00:42:32.436 --> 00:42:33.367
It's like trying to put.
00:42:33.891 --> 00:42:35.271
I don't know, something into Jelly.
00:42:35.331 --> 00:42:38.992
It just doesn't, yeah, it's not a good analogy, but like, it's difficult, right?
00:42:38.992 --> 00:42:40.101
Like it is difficult.
00:42:40.132 --> 00:42:40.972
No, no, it is difficult.
00:42:41.032 --> 00:42:48.891
It's, um, but you can't, the diff the double difficulty is you can't opt out of trying to make this system better, even as you try and build a new system.
00:42:48.922 --> 00:42:49.882
Yeah, you've gotta do both.
00:42:49.882 --> 00:42:58.731
You've gotta, you've gotta build a new system alongside, and I think on the new system along side, you've gotta go where it's quick, quicker, so you've gotta go, okay, this is working.
00:42:58.731 --> 00:42:59.601
Let's go fast here.
00:43:00.411 --> 00:43:04.581
If in one country you've solved something, let's go fast here, and then that's scaled it up to other countries.
00:43:04.581 --> 00:43:10.282
If in one company you've done something, let's go fast here and then scaled it up like that, feels like then.
00:43:10.282 --> 00:43:12.831
Yeah, exactly.
00:43:12.831 --> 00:43:18.831
No, I, it it it's the right kind of balancing act to get sorted.
00:43:18.952 --> 00:43:20.512
I mean, it's not a new problem.
00:43:20.811 --> 00:43:28.581
It, it's, uh, it's always been when people are looking at political change and transitions, it's always the same.
00:43:29.242 --> 00:43:30.891
Dynamic that you're looking at.
00:43:30.891 --> 00:43:40.461
I think it was SK who said the crisis consists in the fact that the old is dying and the future cannot yet be born.
00:43:41.001 --> 00:43:41.092
Mm-hmm.
00:43:41.331 --> 00:43:48.711
and I have really seen that description of the ampas we're in at the moment.
00:43:48.717 --> 00:43:50.211
Cause the, the past is dying.
00:43:50.782 --> 00:43:52.222
There is no question about that.
00:43:52.672 --> 00:43:56.391
And there's his final throws, which you can see crumbling even if you.
00:43:56.916 --> 00:43:58.536
Yeah, it really is.
00:43:58.547 --> 00:43:59.677
Uh, and it's painful.
00:43:59.677 --> 00:44:03.456
And, uh, a a as it dies, of course, it causes a lot of damage.
00:44:03.567 --> 00:44:04.056
Yeah.
00:44:04.061 --> 00:44:08.677
And the future is being born and you can see what the contours of that new world looks like.
00:44:09.157 --> 00:44:09.427
Yes.
00:44:09.427 --> 00:44:13.416
So you've got some people who are intent on accelerating the death of the old system.
00:44:13.422 --> 00:44:22.686
You've got some people who are intent on bringing forward the future system through practice, not just through ideas and.
00:44:23.632 --> 00:44:25.282
These two things coexist it.
00:44:25.286 --> 00:44:28.282
That's why it looks like quite mud all the time.
00:44:28.282 --> 00:44:34.041
Cause you've got different forces at work in different parts of this dynamic.
00:44:34.612 --> 00:44:34.851
Yeah.
00:44:34.856 --> 00:44:36.411
So it's, it's messy.
00:44:36.891 --> 00:44:41.121
Well it's such a tension to hold everything that's happening.
00:44:41.452 --> 00:44:43.641
There's so many elements that are happening right now.
00:44:43.641 --> 00:44:46.302
That's such an interesting tension to be Yeah.
00:44:46.302 --> 00:44:49.702
Well I'm very conscious that cuz when we set the forum up in 1996, we were a.
00:44:50.842 --> 00:44:56.961
We set it up as a solutions based organization and, and what we said is we don't campaign against anything.
00:44:56.961 --> 00:45:03.802
We campaign for the solutions to the problems that we face, and as an organization that's what we do.
00:45:04.132 --> 00:45:04.192
Yeah.
00:45:04.192 --> 00:45:21.277
For me personally, I've got too much anger bubbling around in my own psychological makeup just to stick with building solutions, which is why I continue to pull up my big stick and beat up on the people who I think.
00:45:21.876 --> 00:45:27.456
Are part of the dying past, but they're not dying fast enough and I want to make them die faster.
00:45:27.847 --> 00:45:30.907
So that obviously isn't forum for the future.
00:45:30.911 --> 00:45:34.086
In fact, even saying that will, yeah, yeah, probably.
00:45:34.086 --> 00:45:39.786
I've now breached the code of conduct for a forum for the future, cuz we're not really like that as an organ.
00:45:39.817 --> 00:45:40.657
We're nothing like that.
00:45:40.657 --> 00:45:43.086
As an organization, it's a difficult balance to hold, isn't it?
00:45:43.086 --> 00:45:43.266
That?
00:45:43.661 --> 00:45:44.081
Stick.
00:45:44.081 --> 00:45:46.001
Plus also, let's help you with carrots.
00:45:46.001 --> 00:45:47.101
Like it's a difficult bag.
00:45:47.106 --> 00:45:47.862
It is difficult.
00:45:47.862 --> 00:45:55.271
It is, but, but you know, I've got both in my kit bag and I'll get them out depending on who I'm with and what the circumstances are, what I'm feeling like on that day.
00:45:55.271 --> 00:46:06.672
And sometimes my ability to give the positive messages depend on how I'm feeling about the integrity of the people that we're working with, the prospect for moving things faster.
00:46:07.152 --> 00:46:09.911
You know, it's all, it's all mixed up in.
00:46:10.521 --> 00:46:23.092
Well, I've certainly appreciated both looking at what you and the people that built Forum built and other elements that you built as well, and, and, and learning from that, and also your time in, in sort of helping me at those very early stages.
00:46:23.097 --> 00:46:24.561
It, it's, yeah, no, it's good.
00:46:24.567 --> 00:46:26.492
And we've always tried to be a.
00:46:27.621 --> 00:46:47.121
Very supportive of all the new ways of making this kind of approach work, cuz it's it's apl verse of brilliant, new, innovative ways of, of helping people come together in trust-based communities to bring about change, which results in better lives for more people, basically.
00:46:47.512 --> 00:46:49.282
And there's never gonna be one route to that.
00:46:49.282 --> 00:46:53.992
It's always gonna be multiple different routes at different scales in different parts of our lives.
00:46:53.992 --> 00:46:55.492
So for us in the forum, it's always.
00:46:56.106 --> 00:47:05.766
Part of our role to work with those change makers as you did with Huge Planet and to, and to sort of see what the combined effect looks like.
00:47:06.067 --> 00:47:07.717
That's what the story is.
00:47:07.777 --> 00:47:09.306
That's where transformation comes.
00:47:09.697 --> 00:47:15.067
Well, it's, I, I, I really feel that, and I feel our movement was.
00:47:16.231 --> 00:47:21.186
is more collaborative now than it has been, but I still think has, yeah, been a long, long way.
00:47:21.186 --> 00:47:27.516
Like I found solace in our connection, but there's lots of people that didn't have time and so that's okay, right?
00:47:27.521 --> 00:47:28.567
That's just how it happens.
00:47:28.567 --> 00:47:35.617
But I think that there, that, that as a movement, we need to be a lot more joined up.
00:47:35.706 --> 00:47:37.737
I think that's definitely something that I've noticed.
00:47:37.737 --> 00:47:43.387
Yeah, I've, and a lot more open to collaborate and a lot more open to share, which I'm seeing starting, and it's complicated, but.
00:47:45.681 --> 00:48:02.512
Yeah, that I, it almost feels like one of the biggest changes that could happen organizationally would be to have teams that are focused on collaboration and that's their whole business, is to look outside with no vested interest in themselves, apart from to do good or to do better, like pre-competitive.
00:48:02.512 --> 00:48:05.931
I think that would be a really interesting thing to see start happening.
00:48:05.931 --> 00:48:07.282
I haven't seen that in, in.
00:48:08.106 --> 00:48:10.056
It's, there's tension there, Carl.
00:48:10.447 --> 00:48:10.896
Yeah, there is.
00:48:11.496 --> 00:48:21.967
I've, you know, throughout my life I've, I've come up against people often funders in charities, for instance, who say, there's so many, so many organizations, you're all doing slightly different things, but you all seem to be in roughly the same sense.
00:48:22.327 --> 00:48:28.226
Why don't you combine forces and work together and then you think, well, yeah, no, sometimes that.
00:48:28.731 --> 00:48:36.231
But a lot of the time it doesn't work and you've just got to accept that this is a very diverse movement with lots of, that feels true.
00:48:36.442 --> 00:48:36.831
Right.
00:48:37.001 --> 00:48:38.452
But I would also say that what?
00:48:38.632 --> 00:48:43.041
Like that for me, collaboration is what can you do together and what don't you need to do together?
00:48:43.402 --> 00:48:48.021
So you need like, you need lots of people that are doing lots of different things in the world that they see that feels true.
00:48:48.081 --> 00:48:48.442
Yeah.
00:48:48.442 --> 00:48:48.443
Yeah.
00:48:48.802 --> 00:48:49.521
And that's great.
00:48:49.552 --> 00:48:52.972
Cause otherwise you wouldn't get people helping our people in the way that they need to be helped.
00:48:53.092 --> 00:48:53.722
That's fine.
00:48:53.961 --> 00:48:55.882
But you also, there's things like data.
00:48:56.092 --> 00:48:59.001
So what Gavin Starks is doing with Icebreaker one is super interesting.
00:48:59.007 --> 00:49:06.532
Like how do we have open data so we can all sort of figure out there's, I think there are things that we really need to like No, I agree.
00:49:06.536 --> 00:49:07.461
No, absolutely.
00:49:07.822 --> 00:49:08.092
Right.
00:49:08.092 --> 00:49:10.672
Like I think, so we have a short amount of time.
00:49:10.672 --> 00:49:12.081
So wrap up.
00:49:12.472 --> 00:49:21.291
Uh, I wonder whether like, Hmm, I wonder whether a nice gentle easing out of, of the conversation would be to say, what, what are we going for?
00:49:21.291 --> 00:49:26.452
Like, what's like, what is that future when we've got past all the messiness?
00:49:27.577 --> 00:49:28.717
Like what does it feel like?
00:49:28.717 --> 00:49:29.317
What's it like?
00:49:29.317 --> 00:49:30.427
What is that future like?
00:49:30.487 --> 00:49:39.336
What, and and, and I think also maybe to speak a bit to the hope that you mentioned in the Hope and help, which Fantastic book, and I love the way that you framed it around hope as well.
00:49:39.726 --> 00:49:43.987
That feels like a nice way to like lead us out and lead everyone out from the Yeah, I know.
00:49:43.987 --> 00:49:54.666
It's, uh, it's certain you need to go to that place at the end of all of this stuff because if you haven't got that place available to you, it's very difficult to keep your energy going.
00:49:54.666 --> 00:49:55.536
It's very difficult to.
00:49:56.586 --> 00:50:05.257
Committed to doing the things we need to do, it's certainly difficult to stay in service to that wider, bigger cause, that's for sure.
00:50:05.827 --> 00:50:14.226
So for me, the, the hope still resides in the chances that we now have to build a different understanding what society could look like.
00:50:14.226 --> 00:50:21.056
Much more compassionate, much more supportive, much more community based, much less dependen.
00:50:21.601 --> 00:50:27.876
on consumerism, much less dependent on the idea that money is the means by which we buy happiness.
00:50:28.237 --> 00:50:34.387
Much gentler in a way, and of course much more attuned to the natural world.
00:50:34.746 --> 00:50:35.237
Oh yeah.
00:50:35.556 --> 00:50:37.677
You know, we've just gotta get back to some.
00:50:38.737 --> 00:50:40.536
Essential understanding here.
00:50:40.717 --> 00:50:55.686
Nature has been practicing what good life on Earth looks like for billions of years, and we still have a ton of stuff to learn from nature, which we need to bring into our sense of what progress looks like.
00:50:56.047 --> 00:50:59.286
To inform it better, to enrich it with a different understanding.
00:50:59.286 --> 00:51:17.436
So this whole wonderful thing called biomimicry, which I love, which is where we take lessons from the natural world and we then use those lessons to help shape our view of architecture, of the built environment, of regenerative farming, of new materials, of different ways of manufacturing.
00:51:17.436 --> 00:51:22.657
You bring back in that learning from nature and uh, there's huge.
00:51:24.302 --> 00:51:25.987
as well as hopefulness in all of that.
00:51:26.599 --> 00:51:36.230
I love the idea of falling into the arms of nature or like just sort of that's, we sort of strive for so much and we've been determined to show this.
00:51:36.235 --> 00:51:43.610
There's things we can build and things we can do without really paying to our natural rhythm and connection with Absolutely.
00:51:44.050 --> 00:51:44.900
Absolutely.
00:51:46.219 --> 00:51:47.539
I'm glad that you ended with nature.
00:51:47.539 --> 00:51:48.139
That feels nice.
00:51:48.144 --> 00:51:48.710
Cause we moved.
00:51:48.710 --> 00:51:48.800
Good.
00:51:49.369 --> 00:51:49.969
That was really nice.
00:51:50.079 --> 00:51:50.519
Yeah.
00:51:52.250 --> 00:51:52.789
Excellent.
00:51:53.119 --> 00:51:53.300
Thanks.
00:51:53.510 --> 00:51:56.000
Well, very nice to have a chance to catch up.
00:51:56.005 --> 00:52:02.199
Carl, I'm really sorry to have introduced your name again by slagging off our, I, I don't like that.
00:52:02.480 --> 00:52:08.599
Um, but good to hear too about so much of the energy you're bringing to bear on this, um, through future planning.
00:52:08.630 --> 00:52:09.949
It It is very inspiring.
00:52:10.099 --> 00:52:10.849
So it's brilliant.