ACERCA DE ESTE EPISODIO
Cognitive Bias in Forensic Pathology Decisions. Itiel Dror from University College London shows that medical examiner decisions can be influenced by the non-medical information to which the experts are exposed, and argues for restrictions on the ways in which medical examiners use such information.
Inglés
Estados Unidos
TRANSCRIPCIÓN 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
BUSCAR EPISODIOS ANTERIORES
Buscar episodios anteriores de Excited Utterance.
OTROS EPISODIOS EN ESTE PODCAST
The Evidentiary Use and Misuse of Forensic Musicology in Copyright Litigation. Fred Yen from Boston College discusses the use of musicology experts in copyright litigation and what they should and should not be permitted to testify about.
Defending Due Process. Brandon Garrett from Duke University discusses his new book, Defending Due Process: Why Fairness Matters in a Polarized World.
Strategy for Strategy's Sake. Edith Beerdsen from Temple University asks whether strategic or "sporting" behavior has any place in a system of legal proof, and when being clever goes too far.
Children and the Making of Modern Evidence Law. Laura Savarese from Michigan State University discusses the role of children’s testimony and nineteenth-century child protection laws in the development of the law of evidence.
Antiracist Expert Evidence. Asess Bhasin from the University of Maryland and Jasmine Gonzales Rose from Boston University discuss the ways in which expert evidence can address racism and racial discrimination in our system of evidence and proof.
Descargo de responsabilidad: El podcast y el arte incluidos en esta página son de Ed Cheng / Alex Nunn, que es propiedad de su propietario y no está afiliado ni respaldado por Listen Notes, Inc.
EDITAR
Gracias por ayudar a mantener actualizada la base de datos de podcasts.
