World Wide Wedge Issue

WEBVTT
00:00:00.017 --> 00:00:07.097
So this week, Mike, to start control org speech, I'm using an old internet friend of mine, Feedly as our prompt.
00:00:07.277 --> 00:00:08.086
Do you remember Feedly?
00:00:08.147 --> 00:00:08.567
Oh yeah.
00:00:08.567 --> 00:00:10.186
I've used Feedly, absolutely.
00:00:10.307 --> 00:00:10.637
Yeah.
00:00:10.637 --> 00:00:10.996
Okay.
00:00:10.996 --> 00:00:19.861
I'm, I'm still a, keen user of it to keep track of all things content, moderation and otherwise, and they have a prompt on their website, which is stay ahead of the curve.
00:00:20.074 --> 00:00:21.724
and I know you try and do this,
00:00:22.474 --> 00:00:22.504
I.
00:00:22.774 --> 00:00:24.634
so how do you stay ahead of the curve?
00:00:24.798 --> 00:00:36.286
Well, today of all days, I think staying ahead of the curve means, uh, stocking up on, on goods that are about to get a lot more expensive in the US because boy, have we entered quite the stupid trade war.
00:00:37.456 --> 00:00:39.795
Ah, yes, I have been following from a five.
00:00:39.795 --> 00:00:46.326
Gotta say, did you enjoy yesterday's, uh, kind of breaking out of the US It was a, a magical day, wasn't it?
00:00:46.445 --> 00:00:47.045
Yeah.
00:00:47.076 --> 00:00:47.526
Yeah.
00:00:47.567 --> 00:00:51.756
we are learning all sorts of crazy things about trade that don't make any, any sense at all.
00:00:51.816 --> 00:00:55.621
Uh, some of which we might talk about in the digital realm today on the podcast.
00:00:55.621 --> 00:00:57.031
But, uh, what about you, Ben?
00:00:57.031 --> 00:00:59.131
How are you, uh, staying ahead of the curve.
00:00:59.320 --> 00:01:02.026
Well, I'm actually kind of opting out of the curve.
00:01:02.085 --> 00:01:07.012
Let's say I'm to the theater tonight to watch a play that I mentioned on Control Al Speech a few weeks ago.
00:01:07.432 --> 00:01:08.361
Moderation.
00:01:08.549 --> 00:01:11.186
it's talk about Busman's Holiday, right?
00:01:11.186 --> 00:01:21.418
It's, yeah, so, uh, going to watch a play about quantum moderation by a playwright called Kevin Couchman, who also runs a podcast that some people might have listened to called The Art of Darkness.
00:01:21.659 --> 00:01:22.888
and really looking forward to that.
00:01:22.888 --> 00:01:24.659
I'm, I'm zipping off after we.
00:01:24.748 --> 00:01:26.338
Is recording to go and watch that.
00:01:26.560 --> 00:01:28.206
and the news will be the news.
00:01:28.210 --> 00:01:28.805
I, I, you know,
00:01:29.391 --> 00:01:32.120
I was gonna say you have to give a review on next week's episode.
00:01:32.287 --> 00:01:34.066
I will, I will tell listeners what it's like.
00:01:34.305 --> 00:01:37.519
and, uh, yeah, there's a reason to come back, if nothing else next week.
00:01:45.543 --> 00:01:52.837
Hello and welcome to Control Alt Speech, your weekly roundup of the major stories about online speech, content moderation, and internet regulation.
00:01:53.257 --> 00:02:05.921
It's April the third, 2025, and this week's episode is brought to you with financial support from the future of online trust and safety fund and sponsorship by the Internet Society, the global nonprofit that advocates for an open, globally connected.
00:02:06.284 --> 00:02:08.625
Secure and trustworthy internet for everyone.
00:02:09.074 --> 00:02:16.935
This week we're talking about the US throwing its weight around in the digital policy space and the big Netflix show that everyone's talking about in the uk.
00:02:17.444 --> 00:02:18.585
My name is Ben Whitelaw.
00:02:18.705 --> 00:02:23.194
I'm the founder and editor of Everything and Moderation, and I'm with a, Mike Nik.
00:02:23.194 --> 00:02:27.641
Q is you, you haven't told me if you've been affected by the, stock prices this morning.
00:02:28.602 --> 00:02:29.051
I dunno.
00:02:29.081 --> 00:02:30.072
I dunno where you keep your mind.
00:02:30.072 --> 00:02:34.211
And we don't, we don't get into that in the, in the relationship we have as co-host, but, um.
00:02:34.681 --> 00:02:37.157
It's hell of a hell of a lot of news that you've woken up to.
00:02:37.382 --> 00:02:37.951
Yeah.
00:02:37.981 --> 00:02:39.215
Yeah, I mean, yeah.
00:02:39.485 --> 00:02:44.337
Yes, in terms of stock market stuff, I have money in, certain things and I don't look at them ever.
00:02:44.427 --> 00:02:55.832
So I'm, I am going to continue that trend, and figure at some point, you know, when I need to retire or whatever, I'll look at my portfolio and deal with it then, because right now I think it would be pretty, pretty damn depressing.
00:02:56.223 --> 00:02:56.612
yeah.
00:02:56.673 --> 00:02:57.723
Ignorance is bliss.
00:02:57.723 --> 00:02:59.252
As with a lot of the news agenda right now.
00:02:59.432 --> 00:03:00.092
Yeah.
00:03:00.152 --> 00:03:00.393
Yeah.
00:03:00.393 --> 00:03:02.673
What a strange, strange world.
00:03:03.078 --> 00:03:07.861
Yeah, well, um, we'll maybe touch on a few elements of it as, as you say.
00:03:08.175 --> 00:03:11.762
but I wanted to thank listeners again for heeding, our call for reviews.
00:03:12.044 --> 00:03:20.852
we got another handful of, five or six reviews from listeners and they have all included, a note about how they really like the podcast.
00:03:21.002 --> 00:03:23.701
This was something that we asked for last week.
00:03:24.752 --> 00:03:29.465
We've got some really nice comments, Mike, and really, really grateful for folks who, taken the time to leave a review.
00:03:29.645 --> 00:03:36.004
Somebody said it leaves you smarter afterwards, which makes me wonder whether that's they're actually reviewing the right podcast.
00:03:37.474 --> 00:03:43.707
Um, and another one said that it was a clear and concise way of understanding the news of tech policy.
00:03:43.707 --> 00:03:46.288
And I, I don't, wouldn't describe us as either of those things, would you?
00:03:48.358 --> 00:03:49.018
Concise.
00:03:49.018 --> 00:03:50.518
I, I question the concise part.
00:03:52.168 --> 00:03:53.877
I, you know, I try to be pretty clear.
00:03:54.742 --> 00:03:56.427
Yeah, I'm not talking about you.
00:03:56.518 --> 00:03:59.578
Let me, let me say, um, you, you had a favorite as well, didn't you?
00:03:59.578 --> 00:04:00.953
One in particular caught your eye.
00:04:01.228 --> 00:04:17.141
Yeah, well, I like the one that, questioned whether or not we should try and turn the reviews of the podcast into a trust and safety experiment, perhaps by starting to write a novel on here, which is a reference to, to a discussion that we had about Tech Dirt comments not too long ago.
00:04:17.458 --> 00:04:18.672
so yes, very clever.
00:04:18.767 --> 00:04:25.348
we like the clever reviews, and if you wanna leave a review, it doesn't have to be clever, but we appreciate the clever ones.
00:04:25.651 --> 00:04:26.353
that much more.
00:04:26.392 --> 00:04:28.163
Uh, so drop us a review.
00:04:28.223 --> 00:04:29.812
We, we, we like getting the feedback.
00:04:30.148 --> 00:04:31.333
I've actually got a challenge,
00:04:31.733 --> 00:04:32.242
Oh, no.
00:04:32.293 --> 00:04:33.463
that is a little bit clever.
00:04:33.540 --> 00:04:41.339
I would like listeners to squeeze in a novel title into their review and we'll try and spot'em next week.
00:04:41.339 --> 00:04:46.952
So this, you know, this is maybe tougher than I'm actually imagining as I, as I say this out loud, but famous novels.
00:04:46.963 --> 00:04:47.773
Right, right.
00:04:47.773 --> 00:04:49.879
You mean novels in, book, not novels.
00:04:49.879 --> 00:04:50.209
In new.
00:04:50.959 --> 00:04:51.610
Yes, exactly.
00:04:51.610 --> 00:04:52.600
A novels as in book.
00:04:52.600 --> 00:04:59.737
So, riffing on this idea of, writing in the reviews of controlled speech, try and include a a famous literary
00:05:00.096 --> 00:05:01.101
literary reference.
00:05:01.891 --> 00:05:02.182
Okay,
00:05:02.557 --> 00:05:03.156
let's see how that goes.
00:05:03.161 --> 00:05:03.982
that's a good challenge.
00:05:04.221 --> 00:05:04.581
I like it.
00:05:05.851 --> 00:05:06.302
okay, cool.
00:05:06.302 --> 00:05:11.351
So we have a couple of really interesting, bigger stories this week that we will, go deeper on.
00:05:11.351 --> 00:05:13.692
Then we've got a couple of other small stories that we wanted to flag.
00:05:14.136 --> 00:05:15.072
before we do so.
00:05:15.132 --> 00:05:17.831
Listeners with Control Al Speech will know about the crazy state I.
00:05:18.410 --> 00:05:24.833
US tech policy right now even more broadly than that, but I think that's really why today's bonus chat is so well timed.
00:05:25.252 --> 00:05:32.442
The internet societies, Natalie Campbell is essentially imploring, the US administration to take the lead in developing a more global internet.
00:05:32.593 --> 00:05:37.033
And you had a really good chat with her, Mike about why the US and other countries should do the same.
00:05:37.033 --> 00:05:37.333
So,
00:05:37.737 --> 00:05:41.302
Yeah, and it's, it's really timely given the, discussion on trade.
00:05:41.302 --> 00:05:44.824
And we'll talk about some other stories this week that I think touch on this as well.
00:05:45.242 --> 00:05:49.365
the importance of trade itself is, now front and center, but.
00:05:49.442 --> 00:05:54.952
Most people think of it in terms of like steel and cars and everything like that, but digital trade is also a really important subject.
00:05:55.343 --> 00:06:06.870
And so Natalie and I had a really good talk about kind of the state of the internet and digital trade, and making sure that we keep the internet actually being kind of a global thing, which is very much potentially at risk.
00:06:06.947 --> 00:06:18.456
Indeed, coincidentally, our, first big story of this week is really about digital trade and, and the kind of leverage that countries have, when it comes to regulation and, kind of other, other trade issues.
00:06:18.726 --> 00:06:25.603
You've joined very neatly together, Mike, two stories from the FT and the Wall Street Journal, that really kind of bring this idea to life.
00:06:26.262 --> 00:06:34.069
Yeah, and I was actually debating which order to put these in because way you describe them can influence the, the other one.
00:06:34.339 --> 00:06:47.170
But I think I'll start with the Wall Street Journal one, which jumps into this discussion saying that Zuckerberg was, trying to enlist Trump in the fight against the eus ruling against meta.
00:06:47.589 --> 00:06:49.557
And we sort of knew this was coming.
00:06:49.557 --> 00:06:55.437
I mean, he had said this pretty directly when he went on the Joe Rogan podcast that we had talked about.
00:06:55.706 --> 00:07:04.108
Where he, went on this like kind of silly rant where it was basically like, the job of the US government shouldn't be to punish great American companies like us.
00:07:04.197 --> 00:07:11.831
It should be to protect us from those, you know, crazy regulatory obsessive Europeans who were trying to bring us down.
00:07:11.862 --> 00:07:15.732
And it was this very like, American flag, patriotism.
00:07:15.822 --> 00:07:18.672
let's take on those EU technocrats.
00:07:19.016 --> 00:07:29.567
Um, and so it's no surprise that like as they're getting closer and closer to a fine, that he would then, go to Trump and say like, Hey, can you, help me out here?
00:07:29.800 --> 00:07:50.810
and it's, you know, it's a little unclear If Trump really did very much particularly on this, you know, there have been other parts of the administration that have, at different times mentioned the DSA and the DMA and just this week also before all the tariff stuff came out, the USDR released their report on like different markets and regulatory burdens and things like that.
00:07:50.810 --> 00:07:51.920
And it's always nonsense.
00:07:51.920 --> 00:07:58.420
This report is like, we've covered it for years on techer'cause they always slide in some nonsense about the internet.
00:07:58.634 --> 00:07:59.942
and often like copyright.
00:08:00.331 --> 00:08:13.966
It's so funny, this is a slight aside, but like every year they complain about copyright laws in other countries because Hollywood complete the way this report basically works is US industry sends a bunch of complaints to the USDR and the USDR rewrites them.
00:08:15.005 --> 00:08:19.776
As if like, well, this industry complained therefore it's valid without any recognition of it.
00:08:19.985 --> 00:08:30.706
So my favorite is always the copyright one, where they'll complain about how other countries have exceptions to copyright law, ignoring the fact that the US has the strongest fair use.
00:08:31.321 --> 00:08:32.941
Exceptions to copyright law.
00:08:33.091 --> 00:08:38.931
And so they act as if oh, Canada is a pirate country because they now believe in fair dealing.
00:08:39.500 --> 00:08:41.506
So it's all this kind of nonsense.
00:08:41.506 --> 00:08:53.124
But this year's report, called out the DSA and the DMA as these like trade barriers, which is, you know, I have, as is well known on this podcast, I have my concerns about both the DSA and the
00:08:53.379 --> 00:08:54.774
Oh, we know.
00:08:54.864 --> 00:08:55.254
We know.
00:08:55.693 --> 00:08:56.323
yes, yes.
00:08:57.006 --> 00:08:59.256
And my reputation precedes me so.
00:08:59.919 --> 00:09:04.101
but this just seems like, this is just a purely transactional thing.
00:09:04.701 --> 00:09:16.572
And so the fact that, it's not surprising, but it's just notable that Zuckerberg would go to Trump and be like, Hey, you gotta, slap the EU around a little bit and get them to, not come down on us so hard.
00:09:16.822 --> 00:09:36.711
So then that leads us to the FT story, which is that the EU is going to find meta is finding meta and apple, but they apparently are complying in advance a little bit here and have decided that the fines are going to not be as big as they might otherwise be.
00:09:36.999 --> 00:09:39.729
Specifically to avoid pissing off Donald Trump.
00:09:40.109 --> 00:09:40.328
Mm,
00:09:40.826 --> 00:09:42.235
And even though.
00:09:42.591 --> 00:09:45.591
I have my criticisms of the DSA and the DMA.
00:09:45.860 --> 00:09:47.211
This pisses me off.
00:09:47.956 --> 00:09:48.375
go on.
00:09:48.681 --> 00:09:54.033
They may not have, they may not have pissed off Donald Trump, but, making decisions on policy, right?
00:09:54.124 --> 00:09:56.673
this makes a mockery of all of this, right?
00:09:57.035 --> 00:09:59.525
I can complain about the laws, I can complain about how they're enforced.
00:09:59.525 --> 00:10:06.806
I can complain about, the vagaries behind this law and like the incentive structures that it creates and all of these kinds of things.
00:10:07.125 --> 00:10:11.155
But then if you're going to like if you're going to do it, commit to it, right?
00:10:11.605 --> 00:10:16.765
Don't just say like, oh, now if we actually enforce this law that we put in place, which maybe wasn't so good.
00:10:17.186 --> 00:10:20.546
We're gonna avoid that because it might make Donald Trump mad.
00:10:20.546 --> 00:10:22.849
Like that is, giving into a bully, right?
00:10:22.879 --> 00:10:23.869
Donald Trump is a bully.
00:10:23.869 --> 00:10:30.078
I mean, if anything, that what we saw these, the new tariffs that is purely about bullying, right?
00:10:30.438 --> 00:10:41.131
The whole point of those is to bully foreign countries and to actually bully American companies who now have to come and beg like, Hey, can you create an exception for the tariffs that are important to my business?
00:10:41.491 --> 00:10:44.961
It's all about bullying, and if you give in to a bully.
00:10:45.354 --> 00:10:46.673
bully's just going to, go further.
00:10:46.703 --> 00:10:47.063
That's what
00:10:47.153 --> 00:10:47.693
Yeah.
00:10:47.994 --> 00:10:49.854
Oh, I've been bullied enough to know that Mike Dam.
00:10:49.974 --> 00:10:50.568
Let me tell you.
00:10:52.134 --> 00:10:52.403
Yes.
00:10:52.403 --> 00:10:52.703
Yes.
00:10:54.413 --> 00:11:02.360
And so this is, folks in Brussels saying like, well, you know, let's not find Apple or meta that much because it's just gonna upset Donald Trump.
00:11:02.600 --> 00:11:04.370
First of all, any fine.
00:11:04.649 --> 00:11:07.260
you know, as soon as the fines come out, Zuckerberg is gonna freak out.
00:11:07.580 --> 00:11:13.777
Tim Cook, maybe not as bad, but he'll probably still go and ask the White House to do something and, and retaliate in some form or another.
00:11:13.986 --> 00:11:15.397
So yeah, there's gonna be retaliation.
00:11:15.537 --> 00:11:19.067
but like, what benefit is there of just like, finding them a little bit?
00:11:19.480 --> 00:11:27.543
all of this is just frustrating, the problems with the laws, the, complex nature of the laws, the regulatory setup of these laws, I already have a problem with.
00:11:27.754 --> 00:11:33.724
But then if you're going to do it, don't chicken out at the last minute and don't chicken out because a bully is, causing all these problems.
00:11:34.083 --> 00:11:34.413
Right.
00:11:34.413 --> 00:11:36.076
And so would you say that this is.
00:11:36.750 --> 00:11:59.366
This is kind of Zuckerberg's play working because essentially, you know, in his famous video with his famous famously expensive watch and his famously expensive, chain, he talked about getting Trump to go into bat for him and other American companies and if the FT reports to be believed that is bearing fruit, because they're gonna get a smaller fine.
00:11:59.855 --> 00:12:04.328
do you think they're likely to kind of, claim this as a win, as an early win for that approach?
00:12:04.328 --> 00:12:06.936
And, and what, what's that likely to lead to?
00:12:07.551 --> 00:12:11.181
I mean, just more of the same, which is the sort of transactional nonsense, right?
00:12:11.211 --> 00:12:12.890
There's no principles behind any of this.
00:12:12.890 --> 00:12:16.010
Now it's all just like, it's organized crime shit, right?
00:12:16.311 --> 00:12:22.890
It's like extortion and bullying and for the world order to work in a non-corrupt way.
00:12:23.328 --> 00:12:27.313
There need to be rules of the road that are actually respected, right?
00:12:27.433 --> 00:12:29.024
And this is just chaos, right?
00:12:29.024 --> 00:12:35.024
And it's just like pure demonstrations of power, and that just leads to nonstop corruption.
00:12:35.423 --> 00:12:37.861
is Donald Trump the ultimate cyber bully?
00:12:40.686 --> 00:12:41.645
Is that what we're saying here,
00:12:42.186 --> 00:12:47.015
Yeah, I, I, maybe, maybe that's an interesting way of thinking about it though.
00:12:47.015 --> 00:12:52.791
I think back to my, my larger issue with the whole like concept of cyber bullying, I.
00:12:53.105 --> 00:12:54.515
Is that he's just a bully.
00:12:54.725 --> 00:13:03.078
The fact that he uses the internet as part of bullying, that like bullies exist and, and everybody communicates over the internet.
00:13:03.078 --> 00:13:08.426
So I, I always have a little bit of a problem with the concept of cyber bullying because it's just bullies.
00:13:08.426 --> 00:13:09.775
It's just which tool they're using.
00:13:10.126 --> 00:13:11.509
bullies were bullying over the telephone.
00:13:11.509 --> 00:13:16.163
We didn't call them phone bullies when they're, bullying through sending notes on pieces of paper.
00:13:16.163 --> 00:13:17.663
We didn't call them paper bullies.
00:13:18.082 --> 00:13:19.482
So, he's just a bully.
00:13:19.753 --> 00:13:21.102
Everybody uses the internet.
00:13:21.102 --> 00:13:22.903
It's just the medium of communication these days.
00:13:22.903 --> 00:13:24.500
So yeah, he's just a bully.
00:13:24.904 --> 00:13:25.384
his disability.
00:13:25.384 --> 00:13:25.684
Okay.
00:13:25.690 --> 00:13:28.269
Um, weren't going into how to beat a bully.
00:13:28.690 --> 00:13:32.995
'cause I think as a way of like, trying to kind of preempt what, Trump does next.
00:13:33.195 --> 00:13:38.842
so the, is potentially kind of a, big moment for the eus regulatory regime.
00:13:39.243 --> 00:13:40.322
we've obviously seen a lot of.
00:13:40.707 --> 00:14:02.197
Stuff in the news this week about tariffs, and I did note that K Stama UK Prime Minister and a spokesperson of his claimed as a victory, I think it was yesterday or today, saying that the 10% tariffs that the UK had been given was a result of, a kind of friendly, approach, a kind of more discursive approach with things on that basis.
00:14:02.448 --> 00:14:10.581
Could it be that the eus approach over time will be better than like dishing, several, large billion pound fines out to these companies.
00:14:10.956 --> 00:14:11.346
Yeah.
00:14:11.405 --> 00:14:11.645
Right.
00:14:11.645 --> 00:14:13.265
I mean, sure.
00:14:13.775 --> 00:14:15.389
But you can never tell, right?
00:14:15.389 --> 00:14:19.212
I mean, one day something happens in the EU that pisses him off and he'll like.
00:14:20.488 --> 00:14:21.268
Freak out about it.
00:14:21.268 --> 00:14:36.398
And you know, I mean, just last week we had the whole thing with the Signal Gate stuff where JD Vance and Pete Hegseth were, in private, whining about the EU not being willing to carry the weight to, deal with, tensions in the Middle East and fighting in the Middle East.
00:14:36.770 --> 00:14:43.910
So it's like something's gonna happen and all of a sudden he's gonna get mad about something that, that happens in the EU and announce that he is raising.
00:14:44.005 --> 00:14:49.913
the tariffs again, because it's like, that's his way of punching people in the nose and sort of demanding their lunch money.
00:14:50.393 --> 00:14:54.809
And so, you can try and appease him, but it doesn't, doesn't last.
00:14:54.809 --> 00:14:59.039
And the fact that you give in to some extent, it just encourages more bad behavior.
00:14:59.039 --> 00:14:59.970
So I, I don't know.
00:14:59.970 --> 00:15:02.070
I mean, maybe in the short term.
00:15:02.565 --> 00:15:10.900
There is this, theory that's sometimes the regulators even talk about, which is like regulation is a bargaining chip, rather than to actually follow through with the fines.
00:15:11.291 --> 00:15:27.408
And the FTPs talks about kind of how Apple were changing some of their browser features because of the DMA and, So there is kind of precedent there, but it just seems like Zuckerberg is, not willing to play that game, to the same degree that maybe Cook and Apple are.
00:15:27.932 --> 00:15:28.232
Yeah.
00:15:28.232 --> 00:15:32.879
Which is, kind of not ironic, that's not the right term, but like, for the last.
00:15:33.274 --> 00:15:34.174
Decade or so.
00:15:34.345 --> 00:15:38.571
that's the one thing Zuckerberg was, sort of, he always would cave, right?
00:15:38.630 --> 00:15:42.260
Like every regulatory threat he had no fight in him.
00:15:42.500 --> 00:15:49.504
So this is a little different for him in that this is a regulatory fight that he suddenly, he seems to feel renewed.
00:15:49.643 --> 00:16:02.613
vigor in like, fighting the eu, which is kind of crazy because like meta of all company, all the big companies was sort of the first to sort of embrace the EU approach and say like, sure, we're gonna comply with that.
00:16:02.793 --> 00:16:05.972
And even then trying to import the EU approach to the us.
00:16:06.337 --> 00:16:08.860
you know, there were all these, laws being pushed almost.
00:16:08.931 --> 00:16:10.513
None of which passed in Congress.
00:16:10.513 --> 00:16:19.393
But also, you know, some of the state laws that we've talked about were really sort of based on EU regulations and with meta's pretty strong support.
00:16:19.677 --> 00:16:20.730
in many cases.
00:16:21.000 --> 00:16:25.860
And so for him to now be complaining about the EU approach, I think it's just purely opportunism.
00:16:25.870 --> 00:16:29.321
he just sees like we can get Trump to, try and bash these things for us.
00:16:29.321 --> 00:16:43.975
And so we have this period of time where we have this idiot in the White House who will go to bat for us and try and knock down regulations and maybe that helps us expand a little bit and put us in a better position when, inevitably.
00:16:44.525 --> 00:16:47.676
Some sense has to return to the White House, but I, I don't know.
00:16:48.260 --> 00:16:48.620
Yeah.
00:16:48.740 --> 00:16:49.850
You know what I think the issue is?
00:16:50.173 --> 00:16:52.726
I think we can put it down to when Zuckerberg started to do MMA.
00:16:55.635 --> 00:17:04.673
Pre MMA, he was, you know, he was a, he was a kind of cuddly guy, rolled over when any regulators had a, something to throw at him and, now he's all kind of pent up and bristling.
00:17:04.928 --> 00:17:08.845
the Joe Rogan masculine, uh, what was the, the phrase that he used?
00:17:08.904 --> 00:17:10.375
Uh, masculine energy.
00:17:10.404 --> 00:17:10.734
Yeah.
00:17:10.815 --> 00:17:11.079
yeah.
00:17:11.079 --> 00:17:12.160
The masculine energy.
00:17:12.160 --> 00:17:12.579
Yeah.
00:17:13.045 --> 00:17:13.525
energy.
00:17:13.525 --> 00:17:14.755
And so, I don't know.
00:17:14.785 --> 00:17:16.765
Yeah, maybe he got hit too many times in the head.
00:17:17.335 --> 00:17:19.045
Um, but yeah.
00:17:19.789 --> 00:17:21.769
Well, masculine energy is where we'll go next.
00:17:21.769 --> 00:17:23.056
Actually, for our next story.
00:17:23.266 --> 00:17:25.722
It's very, helpful inadvertent segue.
00:17:25.962 --> 00:17:39.303
Um, the story I wanted to kind of talk through this, it was actually the reaction in the UK to a very, very popular Netflix series called Adolescence, which you may have, may not have listened to, uh, or watched rather.
00:17:39.542 --> 00:17:40.083
Have you seen it?
00:17:40.712 --> 00:17:41.883
I have not seen it.
00:17:41.883 --> 00:17:55.212
I did hear an interview with the creator and who I, I think is the lead actor, in it, and it sounded very interesting and I've seen the trailer and I've seen some of the discussion about, but I have not actually watched the series, so I'm, I'm curious on your take on it.
00:17:55.647 --> 00:17:58.000
Yeah, so this it's been a massive story this week.
00:17:58.000 --> 00:18:02.621
It's actually the most watched streaming show in the uk.
00:18:02.784 --> 00:18:04.393
ever within its first week.
00:18:04.633 --> 00:18:10.053
So it had a huge kind of traction, and I think it's in the top 10 for most watch Netflix shows.
00:18:10.385 --> 00:18:11.826
Huge, huge audience.
00:18:12.180 --> 00:18:25.012
and I'm not gonna give any spoilers naturally, but the, it's a four parter looking at a 13-year-old called Jamie, who, is accused of murdering a classmate, a young girl called Katie.
00:18:25.252 --> 00:18:28.326
And each episode looks at various aspects of this.
00:18:28.326 --> 00:18:37.911
Terrible crime from his arrest to the reaction, his school to a kind of, interview at the youth detention center with bio forensic psychologist.
00:18:38.240 --> 00:18:47.657
And then, the last episode is in his family home with his mom and his dad, and his sister and his kind of really captured the imagination of the uk.
00:18:48.095 --> 00:18:56.278
I'm not sure if they coincided it Mike, with the, launch of the OSA, but, uh, it has been a very interesting, week as a result of that.
00:18:56.472 --> 00:18:58.143
and there's a couple of really interesting parts in there.
00:18:58.480 --> 00:19:01.856
the storyline has NCII within it because.
00:19:02.196 --> 00:19:11.317
The young girl, Katie, sent a topless photo to a boy, and that gets leaked, and, she gets accused of lots of things as a result, really targeted.
00:19:11.586 --> 00:19:17.553
she ends up bullying this young guy, Jamie, which is, suggested why he ends up, attacking her.
00:19:17.792 --> 00:19:20.176
So lots of Harms that we talk about in the podcast.
00:19:20.176 --> 00:19:24.307
Mike and the listeners understand and know about crop up in this series.
00:19:24.727 --> 00:19:34.073
But what I'm really interested in talking about is the kind of reaction to it because the reviews and the discussion and, and it's even been talked about in Parliament this week, have really concentrated on.
00:19:34.556 --> 00:19:41.200
the problem that boys have online, Andrew Tate is mentioned a lot, the manosphere is mentioned a lot.
00:19:41.727 --> 00:19:48.269
a lot of the coverage has returned to this idea that young boys, when left to their own devices on the internet are very susceptible.
00:19:48.633 --> 00:19:50.942
and actually I didn't take that from the series at all.
00:19:51.333 --> 00:19:52.262
know, listeners, if you've.
00:19:52.432 --> 00:19:58.060
watched this series and you know you want to send us your thoughts, get in touch with us podcast@controlspeech.com.
00:19:58.180 --> 00:20:04.809
you can even, you know, leave a little review of the adolescent show in, in the reviews of our podcast if you wish.
00:20:05.140 --> 00:20:24.057
Um, but, you know, the thing that I took away was this kind of crisis in parent child communication that a lot of, I would say some of the, kind of most on the money, trust and safety specialists have identified, there's many scenes where this, dad and this young guy Jamie, almost like fail to have any kind of meaningful conversation.
00:20:24.057 --> 00:20:25.407
They, they look past each other.
00:20:25.407 --> 00:20:28.355
They, don't find a way to kind of communicate what the issue is.
00:20:28.355 --> 00:20:38.680
And it suggested that The young guy, Jamie, is on the internet on his own at night, goes in, sits on his laptop after school, but we don't really hear any more about that.
00:20:38.680 --> 00:20:43.757
So a lot of it is insinuated what he does and what he, ends up watching on his phone and on his computer.
00:20:44.191 --> 00:20:57.579
and I think that's really the frustration for me is that people are kind of essentially kind of filling in the gaps where Stephen Graham, the creator and the main actor has, essentially posed questions about What kids do with their time.
00:20:58.089 --> 00:21:00.769
So, Stans talked about it this week.
00:21:01.019 --> 00:21:05.583
the UK Prime Minister, it's gonna be screened in schools, which is a really interesting development.
00:21:05.957 --> 00:21:18.019
and yeah, I just kind of wondered from your watching of the interview with Stephen Graham and, the trader, what you thought about, I guess the issues of posing questions without maybe giving solutions about these challenges.
00:21:18.305 --> 00:21:20.795
Yeah, I mean, it struck me as really interesting.
00:21:20.825 --> 00:21:30.627
You know, when I heard the interview with, Stephen Graham, you immediately realized like the compelling story and it was sort of framed as the thing that interested him and made him, write and want to create this series.
00:21:30.627 --> 00:21:37.481
Was the question of really like, when there is childhood violence, how do the parents deal with it?
00:21:37.856 --> 00:21:41.444
and you can see how that's like, you can raise all sorts of really thorny.
00:21:41.674 --> 00:21:43.835
Interesting, compelling questions.
00:21:44.134 --> 00:21:46.055
And that appears to be what the show does.
00:21:46.535 --> 00:21:56.005
And then to do that, it feels like he took the most obvious sort of straightforward path, which is to like write in this story that involves the internet and some level of cyber bullying.
00:21:56.454 --> 00:22:00.865
And to get back to the point that I was making about Donald Trump, you know, massive cyber bully,
00:22:01.230 --> 00:22:01.450
Mm.
00:22:01.984 --> 00:22:07.136
internet is just sort of like a tool in this, Bullying happens, violence happens.
00:22:07.136 --> 00:22:07.977
It is horrific.
00:22:07.977 --> 00:22:18.076
Whenever it does happen, and especially when it happens among young people, there are stories of that happening that goes back, pre-internet, you can find those horrifying stories and all these things.
00:22:18.497 --> 00:22:20.567
So as a story device, it's fine.
00:22:20.626 --> 00:22:25.977
I think it is a problem to then overly focus on the internet digital aspect of it.
00:22:26.469 --> 00:22:36.827
Because of that reason though, there are elements in there that I do think are relevant and you know, we had the conversation not too long ago about recommendations for, raising kids in a digital era.
00:22:37.097 --> 00:22:46.877
And one of the things that we talked about was like, the most important thing is having a clear line of communication, like making sure that kids feel comfortable talking to their parents about certain things.
00:22:47.000 --> 00:22:59.522
Or that they have, qualified adults that they can go to, that there is this open line of communications and there's an understanding and there's at least some sort of discussion and understanding about, what people are using, what they might encounter, all these things.
00:22:59.777 --> 00:23:03.316
From your description, again, I haven't seen the series, it sounds like.
00:23:03.538 --> 00:23:05.548
That is very relevant here, right?
00:23:05.548 --> 00:23:22.647
If the father and the son are having difficulty communicating and the kid just ends up spending all his time on the device and isn't willing and doesn't feel like he has an open channel to go talk to someone, the moment that he gets into a troubling situation, he doesn't have anyone to go talk to about it, and that is where the problem is, and that is.
00:23:22.890 --> 00:23:25.680
not unique to the internet in particular.
00:23:25.890 --> 00:23:35.343
And is also in some you know, in some ways, like, if he had open lines of communications to other people too, that could be via the internet or via his devices, that could help.
00:23:35.343 --> 00:23:39.083
But if he feels that he has no other outlet, that's when the, problems occur.
00:23:39.083 --> 00:23:47.457
And we've seen this, like we've had all those stories about like the sextortion things, and this isn't a Sextortion story directly, but very similar in that.
00:23:47.707 --> 00:23:52.460
Often young boys feel helpless and they don't have anyone that they can go talk to.
00:23:52.460 --> 00:24:00.809
So, or they feel like because they know they got into trouble because they know they made a bad decision that the only way out is to make an even worse decision.
00:24:01.289 --> 00:24:04.380
But often that's because they don't feel like they have anyone to communicate with.
00:24:04.799 --> 00:24:12.180
And so, this is a story again, that feels like it should be reinforcing the idea of Making sure people have lines of communication.
00:24:12.480 --> 00:24:14.609
If it's to a, a trusted parent, great.
00:24:14.609 --> 00:24:23.380
But if not like to another trusted adult or a trusted authority figure who can help them, with whom they feel that they can admit, I made a mistake.
00:24:23.380 --> 00:24:24.039
I'm in trouble.
00:24:24.039 --> 00:24:24.670
I need help.
00:24:24.855 --> 00:24:33.813
and that's like such a key important detail that we sort of, paper over when we talk about the problems of cyber bullying or kids using too much.
00:24:33.946 --> 00:24:37.626
On the internet and the response is always like, just, you know, stop it.
00:24:37.626 --> 00:24:42.067
You know, stop kids from using it, ban phones in school, ban kids from social media, all these things.
00:24:42.426 --> 00:24:46.426
Not the more important thing, which is like, how do you have a healthy relationship with this?
00:24:46.636 --> 00:24:51.886
And how do you have a healthy relationship with other people so that when you do need help, you have someone to go to.
00:24:52.247 --> 00:24:53.836
And so to me, this feels like.
00:24:54.089 --> 00:25:03.542
That should be the story that comes out of this, that, bad things happen and the real question is, you know, what can you do when bad things happen so that you don't end up making even worse decisions?
00:25:04.049 --> 00:25:09.186
that's sort of my quick take based on, your description and what I've read and, seen and heard.
00:25:09.666 --> 00:25:15.247
Yeah, and I think it, I think you're right about the role models piece and particularly kind of male role models.
00:25:15.396 --> 00:25:24.563
I would say like, I think we, it's probably worth saying that explicitly, not least because Stephen Graham wrote this show with, a guy called Jack Thorn.
00:25:24.778 --> 00:25:31.515
Because of a series of killings in the UK last year of young women by boys.
00:25:31.897 --> 00:25:38.258
and you know, he said, you know, he wants to work out what this spate of murders was caused by and to kind of really dig into it.
00:25:38.258 --> 00:25:43.902
And, what's interesting to me is that, in at least a number of those cases, I won't go into each of them one by one.
00:25:43.902 --> 00:25:47.917
But, you know, in each of those cases there isn't really an internet element.
00:25:48.188 --> 00:25:51.075
Explicitly in those real life deaths.
00:25:51.382 --> 00:25:54.198
one of them, it's a, young guy who.
00:25:54.412 --> 00:25:58.222
is a, put into foster care very young who ends up carrying a knives.
00:25:58.282 --> 00:26:00.982
Age 12, who, has autism.
00:26:00.982 --> 00:26:02.782
You know, there's a whole complex series of factors.
00:26:02.782 --> 00:26:06.386
If you go through the reports of the sentencing of, that man and others.
00:26:06.626 --> 00:26:08.007
It's not just about the internet.
00:26:08.007 --> 00:26:11.336
And in some ways, you know, social media's a very small part of that.
00:26:11.336 --> 00:26:16.480
So, again, interesting that Stephen Graham felt the need to place the internet so prominently
00:26:16.737 --> 00:26:20.576
Yeah, I mean, I, think it's, it's a narrative device and it's an easy one.
00:26:20.606 --> 00:26:28.613
Uh, and, and it's one that people certainly relate to and obviously there's a lot of concern going around about the internet, so I think people sort of naturally get it very quickly.
00:26:28.613 --> 00:26:33.522
But I, I, fear that they overindex on the digital component of it.
00:26:33.862 --> 00:26:35.882
And so, is one of these issues, right?
00:26:35.882 --> 00:26:45.731
I mean, it's like all of these issues are nuanced and complex and they often involve, different issues around mental health and what kinds of support and support structures people have.
00:26:45.852 --> 00:26:48.343
And all of that, gets just ignored.
00:26:48.367 --> 00:26:54.008
and everyone just focuses on like, Ooh, they have this, digital square rectangle in their hands, you know?
00:26:54.492 --> 00:27:04.482
I mean, it made me think partly'cause I'm going to the theater to watch a depiction of content moderation about the need for almost like artistic advisory around this, around this topic.
00:27:04.482 --> 00:27:10.037
And it, it made me think about you, giving those interviews to, was it Saturday Night Live?
00:27:10.037 --> 00:27:12.903
The producers of Saturday Night Live, we talked about it a few weeks
00:27:13.008 --> 00:27:15.474
Oh, the, the, uh, last week tonight, the John Oliver.
00:27:15.505 --> 00:27:15.924
Yeah.
00:27:16.089 --> 00:27:16.345
Oliver.
00:27:16.345 --> 00:27:24.279
Yeah, so it's like, you were used as a kind of artistic advisor essentially to frame the issues and it seems like something that's needed,
00:27:24.650 --> 00:27:25.009
yeah.
00:27:25.009 --> 00:27:34.222
I mean, it's funny because I actually had a conversation late last year with someone who was a, showrunner for, a potential I think TV series.
00:27:34.532 --> 00:27:39.702
and they wanted my advice on exactly this topic on, I, I won't get into the details.
00:27:40.237 --> 00:27:49.692
And I was going through sort of, it was more of like a, introductory interview, but I was working through and they were trying to create a story that would've, you know, effectively blamed the internet for a bunch of things.
00:27:49.692 --> 00:27:53.323
And I sort of pointed out a bunch of the challenges with that approach.
00:27:53.951 --> 00:27:55.777
and then I think they went in a different direction.
00:27:55.807 --> 00:28:00.876
'cause I was probably a little too, too much, like, you know, well, you know, you should think about how you represent this.
00:28:01.217 --> 00:28:02.507
we'll see if that show ever comes out.
00:28:02.507 --> 00:28:04.522
But, yeah, I mean, I think.
00:28:04.597 --> 00:28:10.538
people could do a little bit more nuanced approaches to these things, but it is the sort of easy and quick story, right?
00:28:10.538 --> 00:28:18.711
It's why the news picks up on these things, why the media reports are this way, and why we have these sort of, books about these things that get people all riled up.
00:28:18.778 --> 00:28:21.472
it's a very easy story to tell, even if it's not totally correct.
00:28:22.298 --> 00:28:22.597
Yeah.
00:28:22.748 --> 00:28:23.317
No indeed.
00:28:23.587 --> 00:28:30.972
So, I mean, if you get a chance to watch it, do listeners, if you, have watched it and you want to give us your thoughts, drop us a line.
00:28:31.063 --> 00:28:35.394
I'd be interested to hear how you saw the plot play out and, What you made of it.
00:28:35.845 --> 00:28:41.932
we'll go now, Mike to a, a story that is not dissimilar in terms of, kind of storyline of, adolescence.
00:28:42.258 --> 00:28:47.775
the dad of adolescents played by Stephen Graham gets called, a pedophile at, at one point by, a group of views.
00:28:47.775 --> 00:28:54.508
And this next story is, about how online pedophile hunters are growing in their popularity online.
00:28:54.882 --> 00:28:57.238
talk us through like why you picked this and what you, find interesting about it.
00:28:57.488 --> 00:28:59.258
Yeah, so this was a New York Times story.
00:28:59.258 --> 00:29:08.365
It's a big feature piece that has a bunch of authors and, and folks, and it's about online pedophile, hunters who are growing more violent and.
00:29:08.491 --> 00:29:09.707
going viral.
00:29:10.037 --> 00:29:12.200
And we've heard a few stories about this.
00:29:12.200 --> 00:29:23.962
There have been a few sort of high profile ones and almost all of us sort of like inspired by the sort of wacky TV show to catch a predator that was famous, a couple decades ago now.
00:29:24.457 --> 00:29:30.900
you know, which there was a lot of criticism about that show I think well earned, which is that it sort of, you know, there are.
00:29:31.366 --> 00:29:39.539
Predators out there, everybody knows that there are child predators out there, but they are not nearly as widespread and prevalent as people believe.
00:29:39.930 --> 00:29:50.279
And yet this show sort of presented it as in like, they're everywhere, they're behind every corner, they're in, you know, every other house on your street and, and you know, you should fear.
00:29:50.279 --> 00:30:00.366
And it's also, part of the reason why, kids have less access like, less ability to go run around and, walk to the store by themselves or like go.
00:30:00.518 --> 00:30:02.587
To the park and play with friends by themselves.
00:30:02.857 --> 00:30:09.751
It sort of contributed to this idea that it is a risk for children to go outside and do anything without, immediate supervision.
00:30:10.575 --> 00:30:13.251
and so it's created this, fear and obviously I.
00:30:13.400 --> 00:30:16.877
no one is downplaying the fact that there are predators online.
00:30:16.938 --> 00:30:21.922
We know that those exist and there is a concerted effort to try and track them down and do stuff.
00:30:22.251 --> 00:30:36.528
But, so what's happened here is that basically just vigilantism of a bunch of people have decided that it is fun to try and find and then attack, people that they claim are predators, and that are preying on children.
00:30:36.942 --> 00:30:39.952
but the people who are making these.
00:30:40.118 --> 00:30:46.384
They're, doing them as videos and they're releasing them online and there's a whole community of people who love to watch these things.
00:30:46.384 --> 00:30:48.575
And so they have a community that sort of eggs them on.
00:30:48.964 --> 00:31:02.377
And you have this sort of weird audience capture as well, which is that their audience wants to see them taking down predators and therefore they will go further and further in, terms of trying to find and, expose predators.
00:31:02.907 --> 00:31:06.317
Often by cheating, lying, making stuff up.
00:31:06.650 --> 00:31:15.005
you know, there was a famous case, which is mentioned in this New York Times piece as well, but this made the news, a few months ago of on a college campus.
00:31:15.137 --> 00:31:26.917
a bunch of students, went on a dating app and convinced, there was a, a soldier who I think was like 20 or 21, and convinced him to come to campus to meet a girl, who.
00:31:27.201 --> 00:31:38.575
It turned out in the, I think they were using Tinder, in the app they had said was 18, but they later claimed that they had that she was 17 and therefore he was a predator.
00:31:38.575 --> 00:31:42.444
And he showed up on campus and they like effectively kidnapped him and beat him.
00:31:42.954 --> 00:31:51.452
and then like the police came in and they looked at The Tinder profile and everything, like, no, like all of this was like of age, the legal age of consent in that case being 18.
00:31:51.747 --> 00:31:58.686
and so it was like they were totally making stuff up in order to sort of feed this, belief that they were going out there to catch predator.
00:31:58.987 --> 00:32:07.136
And so there are a number of these kinds of stories and you see like the violence and they sort of just, have this sense of like, we have to do this for the audience.
00:32:07.457 --> 00:32:08.656
we're like, we're protecting people.
00:32:08.807 --> 00:32:15.067
It's the same thing we're seeing in other areas too, where it's like the whole like Q Anon thing all about like protecting the children.
00:32:15.067 --> 00:32:19.694
Like there's this, constant fear of like children massively at risk.
00:32:19.694 --> 00:32:26.285
And again, like I have already said it a few times, but you wanna repeat, we're not putting down the fact that there are real dangers, but the extent.
00:32:26.815 --> 00:32:35.575
Of them are much more narrow than people say, but like, because of this widespread belief and this narrative that goes out that you have predators on every corner.
00:32:36.074 --> 00:32:46.413
you know, there are studies that falsely argue that, a new account on Instagram or TikTok will be approached by a predator within like two minutes or whatever.
00:32:46.653 --> 00:32:50.023
And it's like you dig into the methodologies of these and they're all garbage.
00:32:50.023 --> 00:32:51.193
Like it is not.
00:32:51.374 --> 00:32:52.513
True at all.
00:32:52.839 --> 00:33:03.520
and so there's just this pervasive belief out there that like every other person is a predator and then you, you know, it allows these other people to try and go after them in a vigilante way.
00:33:03.855 --> 00:33:10.171
so it's like this combination of really bad incentives, really weird moral panic and.
00:33:10.359 --> 00:33:23.480
It just leads to this, sort of horrible situation where you have this group like Dads Against Predators, that is just really, really focused on, creating these videos and, exposing people, but not always in the, the most honest of ways.
00:33:23.974 --> 00:33:24.335
No.
00:33:24.335 --> 00:33:42.210
And, and to tie it back to a point you made about the last story about mainstream media, if this happened on TV and there was criticism and it continued, it doesn't really set a great precedent when anybody has the ability to do this themselves via a Facebook account or an Instagram account or a kick account.
00:33:42.269 --> 00:33:42.599
Right.
00:33:42.809 --> 00:33:50.536
So there is this kind of, I always see this kind of tension between like mainstream media and, the kind of social media platforms and how.
00:33:50.749 --> 00:33:55.413
How increasingly the rules that kind of govern one seem to be different in, odd ways.
00:33:55.640 --> 00:33:59.205
and it goes to a, to another story that you flagged about, ESPN,
00:33:59.715 --> 00:34:08.463
Yeah, and there's a couple things here too where it's like, just to close out on this, you know, in the New York Times article, they do mention that YouTube banned these kinds of videos and actually has taken them down.
00:34:08.463 --> 00:34:12.813
So, but they moved on to things like Kick and Rumble and, and all these other platforms.
00:34:12.873 --> 00:34:18.516
And so you have to deal with the fact that these things will move around and like people will try and search it out and find the audience.
00:34:18.786 --> 00:34:21.905
But the ESPN story, I think is related to this and is related to.
00:34:22.347 --> 00:34:28.085
Almost all of our earlier stories too, like the story about Adolescences too, which is, this story got a bunch of attention.
00:34:28.085 --> 00:34:36.585
There's this ESPN host, pat McAfee, who's like a former NFL player and he's got a, this, show on, on ESPN that is like the broy kind of show.
00:34:36.585 --> 00:34:52.686
And he, you know, I went back and looked, it's, Too involved to get into, but like, he basically repeated an internet rumor about a young, college student at a college that then led to the world condemning her, condemning her boyfriend.
00:34:53.146 --> 00:34:57.255
was like this huge mess and she's now talking about suing him and everything like that.
00:34:57.706 --> 00:35:05.760
But it was a thing that reminded me of the book Network Propaganda by Yohi Bankler and his co-authors about how like.
00:35:06.094 --> 00:35:16.775
During the 2016 election, the craziest rumors may have started on the internet, but they were kept in really small pockets until Fox News would suddenly broadcast them as real.
00:35:16.775 --> 00:35:23.800
And this was the same thing, whereas like these internet rumors that suddenly were broadcast on ESPN and then the attacks came.
00:35:23.800 --> 00:35:27.190
So there's this intersection of, these systems are way more complex.
00:35:27.190 --> 00:35:28.510
It's not just the internet.
00:35:28.882 --> 00:35:32.902
It's the internet plus then a big platform doing stuff.
00:35:32.932 --> 00:35:41.679
And so you're seeing all of these different things that are these very complex situations without, real, you can't simplify it down to like, Ooh, the Internet's bad.
00:35:42.360 --> 00:35:46.003
Yeah, no, I think they're kind of helpful, framings for those stories, Mike.
00:35:46.003 --> 00:35:51.552
And yeah, we'll obviously include all of today's stories in the show notes and people can have a read of them themselves.
00:35:51.793 --> 00:35:58.938
But I think thinking about the interplay between kinda mainstream media and platforms harms is, is a really interesting way To do that.
00:35:59.253 --> 00:36:03.130
I'll just kind of touch on a, final story, Mike, before we go to the bonus chat.
00:36:03.369 --> 00:36:17.735
That is, I think a really, again, tragic circumstances this week with the 7.7 magnitude earthquake in Myanmar and the, the New York Times have looked at this story through the lens of internet connectivity, and.
00:36:18.057 --> 00:36:25.090
What I didn't know was the kind of effect that the military Genta was having on On the internet in Myanmar.
00:36:25.150 --> 00:36:32.775
And only after the events of this week have I gone back and had a look at where Myanmar is on, on the freedom of, net ranking.
00:36:33.195 --> 00:36:41.507
But it's a huge issue and has really affected actually the ability to get relief and to rescue some of the people affected by the earthquake.
00:36:41.934 --> 00:36:51.621
because of the, the blackouts and because of the, the connectivity issues, causing in the country, it's been really difficult to, share information about where relatives are.
00:36:52.427 --> 00:36:54.342
it's left a lot of people very isolated.
00:36:54.702 --> 00:37:04.722
It's been very difficult to get kind of food and supplies to people in the country and meanwhile next door in surrounding countries because the nature of internet censorship is not anywhere near as bad.
00:37:05.023 --> 00:37:07.503
the way that the earthquake is kind of seen is very different.
00:37:07.503 --> 00:37:09.902
So again, it's a reminder really about how.
00:37:10.780 --> 00:37:15.170
real life does rely on, the web and the internet to share information.
00:37:15.170 --> 00:37:24.880
And, it is also worth knowing that, that, like freedom on net report is actually, I was reading this week, kind of in, jeopardy because of the cuts, uh, to USAID funding.
00:37:24.880 --> 00:37:33.661
And so we might not even know the effect of, the state of the internet is in countries like Myanmar because this, fantastic report that's been going many years.
00:37:34.010 --> 00:37:34.878
is under threat.
00:37:34.878 --> 00:37:44.773
So not a great, not a very hopeful note to end on this week, Mike, but, um, I guess it does connect to the bonus chat and to your conversation with Natalie.
00:37:45.217 --> 00:37:45.577
Yeah.
00:37:45.577 --> 00:37:59.768
I mean, I think this report on Myanmar and, and just the fact that, you know, when you don't have internet freedom, we forget how much we rely on the internet as it is the communications medium that we rely on so much for everything, for all sorts of important information.
00:38:00.068 --> 00:38:01.027
And when you have.
00:38:01.117 --> 00:38:07.148
An internet that is not free when you need that sort of emergency communications to have that cut off.
00:38:07.447 --> 00:38:15.811
And, you know, the New York Times article compares Thailand to Myanmar where, rescue and important information is flowing much more freely in Thailand than Myanmar.
00:38:15.811 --> 00:38:20.641
And Myanmar is having a much rougher time of it because the internet is, is so limited and blocked.
00:38:21.030 --> 00:38:45.576
And yeah, it leads really nicely into the conversation that I have with Natalie, which is that, Talking about how the US going back to the Biden administration started to walk back and push away from the idea of supporting open internet, free digital trade, digital data flows across borders, which had been going back many, many years, a key part of, us, advocacy around the globe.
00:38:46.025 --> 00:38:49.036
And, last year the US Trade Rep.
00:38:49.172 --> 00:38:52.090
Under Biden started to back away from that and remove some of that.
00:38:52.090 --> 00:38:54.722
That information from their documents and from their websites.
00:38:54.722 --> 00:39:02.829
And there was, there's been real concern among a number of advocacy groups of, what happens when the US no longer backs a free and open internet?
00:39:03.280 --> 00:39:11.010
And so, the internet society, along with a few other groups, put together a letter calling that out to the new USDR and hoping that they would do a better job.
00:39:11.545 --> 00:39:17.641
About, digital free trade and, free data flows and open data flows, and an open internet and really supporting that.
00:39:17.760 --> 00:39:19.867
And so that's, what my conversation with Natalie is about.
00:39:22.898 --> 00:39:23.639
[music]
00:39:31.025 --> 00:39:45.364
It's great to have Natalie Campbell from the Internet Society back on the podcast this time to talk about an incredibly important issue that may sound wonky to some, but could have some very serious implications about the future of a global open internet.
00:39:45.871 --> 00:39:53.039
I know that you, the Internet Society, along with the A-C-L-U-C-D-T and Freedom House all sent a letter.
00:39:53.181 --> 00:39:56.271
Recently to the US Trade rep, Jameson Greer.
00:39:56.690 --> 00:40:00.621
So can you tell us about the letter and why you decided to send it?
00:40:00.971 --> 00:40:03.460
Sure, and thanks for having me here today, Mike.
00:40:03.460 --> 00:40:04.601
It's really great to be here.
00:40:04.893 --> 00:40:16.239
We sent the letter to USTR, asking to reverse what we thought was a dangerous US digital policy shift made in 2023 that could lead to the demise of the open internet.
00:40:16.646 --> 00:40:20.635
What happened was this digital policy shift deprioritized.
00:40:20.971 --> 00:40:29.487
A couple of longstanding US internet protections that were crucial to helping the internet grow and become the valuable resource that it is today.
00:40:29.824 --> 00:40:34.414
and which were also crucial to enabling the US to become a hub for digital innovation.
00:40:34.775 --> 00:40:40.594
So this included things like protecting what is essential for the internet to exist in the first place.
00:40:40.594 --> 00:40:48.139
Things like open cross-border data flows, stopping security threats, like mandated data localization and data flow restrictions.
00:40:48.659 --> 00:41:03.106
when we saw this digital policy shift, we got really worried because abandoning these protections told the world, including a lot of countries that don't like the open internet, that protecting the ability to access the global internet was no longer a US priority.
00:41:03.617 --> 00:41:06.376
And this is especially concerning in a trade context.
00:41:06.815 --> 00:41:15.365
So the more countries raise barriers on the internet, the less valuable the open internet becomes to us all, both in the US and people worldwide.
00:41:15.755 --> 00:41:21.097
Barriers to data flows, can have a lot of harmful impacts beyond just digital trade.
00:41:21.456 --> 00:41:25.086
They restrict our ability to learn, work and do business online.
00:41:25.507 --> 00:41:28.717
They put individual and national security at risk.
00:41:29.197 --> 00:41:42.936
It can erode human rights, and we've seen this play out in many countries where mandated localization laws are already in place, and it also prevents the free flow of information and restricts just general global discourse.
00:41:44.106 --> 00:41:55.626
We think that the internet is especially at risk now with virtually every country considering how to preserve economic stability given the US global tariff discussions.
00:41:56.422 --> 00:42:01.041
Some countries are considering drastic moves that would further splinter the internet.
00:42:01.641 --> 00:42:08.985
And we sent this letter because we believe that the internet should never be a bargaining chip in trade discussions.
00:42:09.644 --> 00:42:11.864
The United States has an incredible opportunity.
00:42:12.489 --> 00:42:23.768
With a new USTR to reestablish its leadership role to secure the future of the open internet, and it can do that by aligning with the internet principles that we've included in our letter.
00:42:24.170 --> 00:42:30.201
So this letter is directed at the US Trade Rep, but do you see it being applicable worldwide?
00:42:30.679 --> 00:42:31.878
That's a really good question.
00:42:31.878 --> 00:42:34.099
It's totally applicable worldwide.
00:42:34.398 --> 00:42:48.708
We're hoping that the United States steps up and take some leadership on this issue, but we're also hoping that every other country, especially those that are considering what they're gonna do next in trade, that they also choose to continue supporting the open internet.
00:42:48.934 --> 00:42:59.771
We can't take the internet for granted and we need to leave it off the bargaining table when it comes to digital trade because it's the very thing that makes digital trade possible in the first place.
00:43:00.251 --> 00:43:03.971
Aligning with the principles in our letter is a great start.
00:43:04.393 --> 00:43:07.030
but you know, we can't just say we support the internet.
00:43:07.030 --> 00:43:09.684
We actually have to, walk the walk on it as well.
00:43:10.202 --> 00:43:19.465
So can you talk a little bit more about the historical importance of the US leadership on promoting a free internet and free flow of data?
00:43:19.873 --> 00:43:20.353
Sure.
00:43:21.043 --> 00:43:27.733
So the US has a long history of promoting the open internet, and a lot of that happens in a trade context.
00:43:27.733 --> 00:43:44.407
Now we at the Internet society don't promote internet policymaking through trade, but it just happens that the United States championing and open globally connected internet through protections and trade has been crucial to the growth and development of the internet worldwide and.
00:43:44.822 --> 00:43:53.880
Internet access and data flows are crucial to digital trade itself and developing countries digital economies.
00:43:54.481 --> 00:44:08.371
In these trade negotiations in context, some countries have steered away from data flow restrictions and mandated data localization simply to avoid jeopardizing their ability to engage in trade with the US.
00:44:08.755 --> 00:44:13.195
In 2023, when the USTR had deprioritized.
00:44:13.742 --> 00:44:23.190
the internet protections that we're talking about today, this gave a green light to countries that open internet was no longer a barrier to trade with the United States.
00:44:23.472 --> 00:44:31.034
And given the fact that the United States has a lot of influence in trade, you know, it's top of mind for so many countries and news cycles right now.
00:44:31.394 --> 00:44:33.375
This is very concerning.
00:44:33.465 --> 00:44:45.396
We know that, Unless the US verts back to protecting the internet, these discussions we're worried that countries could retaliate with measures that may not just be economic.
00:44:45.396 --> 00:44:54.793
We're worried that they could, consider digital policies that would further fragment the internet ultimately erode what it needs to keep us globally connected in the first place.
00:44:55.364 --> 00:44:59.871
So you mentioned this a little bit, but maybe wanted to dig in a little bit more.
00:44:59.931 --> 00:45:03.021
Why do you think that this is so important right now?
00:45:03.081 --> 00:45:05.601
I know that we're sort of in the midst of.
00:45:05.795 --> 00:45:11.902
Trade wars around the globe, and there's all these, talk of Donald Trump, issuing tariffs on other countries.
00:45:12.322 --> 00:45:22.195
How does this issue, you know, I think when people think about tariffs in particular, they're thinking about, steel and, hard goods and, products being shipped around.
00:45:22.599 --> 00:45:24.998
but how does that relate to the internet specifically?
00:45:25.427 --> 00:45:26.838
That's a really good question.
00:45:27.137 --> 00:45:33.302
So back in 2023, we were already seeing the world move towards more protectionism, whether.
00:45:33.958 --> 00:45:40.557
because of misguided views that things like mad data localization or data flow restrictions could somehow keep data more safe.
00:45:40.918 --> 00:45:47.697
Or just governments wanting more access to sensitive information under the guise of helping out law enforcement.
00:45:48.358 --> 00:45:52.378
I don't think anyone could have predicted where we find ourselves now with trade.
00:45:52.735 --> 00:45:58.005
by the time the this episode airs, we'll know more about the global tariffs that, the US has.
00:45:58.123 --> 00:46:00.581
Just announced just before we started recording this.
00:46:01.195 --> 00:46:16.085
but countries around the world, both democratic and others that are being impacted by these announcements are actively considering retaliation and self-preservation measures that could further splinter the internet so far.
00:46:16.257 --> 00:46:23.777
Countries like the EU and Canada have taken, more of a tit for tat approach to match the US administration's moves and not escalate.
00:46:24.226 --> 00:46:30.516
But, within those same countries, we are hearing from, you know, industry associations.
00:46:30.516 --> 00:46:35.226
We're hearing from thought leaders that maybe those measures need to go beyond.
00:46:35.572 --> 00:46:36.802
Retaliatory tariffs.
00:46:36.802 --> 00:46:42.592
Maybe we should think about digital policies that, could, be very problematic to the internet.
00:46:43.128 --> 00:46:52.541
Du commission President Ursula v Darline has said Europe holds a lot of cards, and all instruments are on the table.
00:46:53.112 --> 00:47:15.222
So a few weeks ago a new tech coalition called for the EU to take stronger measures to reduce its reliance on US internet infrastructure and services, and suggested that the EU even goes so far as to develop requirements for, public-private cloud users to opt to use sovereign cloud services for storing their sensitive data.
00:47:15.692 --> 00:47:23.161
These are some of the kind of suggestions that raise red flags for the internet society because these could mean mandated data localization.
00:47:23.161 --> 00:47:30.847
These could mean further data flow restrictions, things that chip away, at the open internet, and our ability to stay globally connected.
00:47:31.335 --> 00:47:40.295
Canada's, you know, having some of those same considerations right now amongst, different experts in think tanks, and we think it's really problematic.
00:47:40.393 --> 00:47:45.432
It's understandable that countries around the world are thinking about how to keep their economies resilient.
00:47:45.943 --> 00:47:51.862
But again, the internet is, foundational for digital economies to thrive.
00:47:51.862 --> 00:47:56.483
And so when countries are thinking about what to do, the internet, should never be on the table.
00:47:57.123 --> 00:48:10.293
Yeah, I mean, I, I, I sort of fear that because other countries are gonna be looking for ways to retaliate, the internet becomes a really easy target just because of the importance and sort of centrality of the internet.
00:48:10.293 --> 00:48:10.353
I.
00:48:10.353 --> 00:48:14.668
To the United States, but that it reaches to all corners of the globe.
00:48:14.668 --> 00:48:17.248
And so it becomes a, a really easy target.
00:48:17.485 --> 00:48:25.054
so given all that and all the concerns that you raised, what is it that you're hoping that the USTR will do in this particular case?
00:48:25.554 --> 00:48:32.755
We're hoping that the United States will restore its leadership role to promote and protect the internet and revert its digital trade policy.
00:48:32.755 --> 00:48:34.675
Back to protecting the internet.
00:48:35.094 --> 00:48:40.958
This means, you know, aligning with the principles in our letter that include protecting open data flows.
00:48:40.967 --> 00:48:57.257
Which support the free flow of information and online discourse, and also promoting privacy and security by preventing data localization requirements, mandated source code disclosure and discrimination against foreign digital services and products.
00:48:57.668 --> 00:49:05.490
We need US leadership to protect the internet, both in the global bilateral tree negotiations happening now.
00:49:05.894 --> 00:49:06.610
and all of its.
00:49:06.826 --> 00:49:11.655
PLU lateral and international initiatives, including those at the World Trade Organization.
00:49:12.021 --> 00:49:20.579
But choosing the internet doesn't mean that, the US can't pass laws about the internet, which were some of the concerns raised back in 2023.
00:49:21.161 --> 00:49:29.492
there are always exceptions in trade agreements, that allow for that at home without us leadership, especially now to protect the internet.
00:49:29.900 --> 00:49:40.431
We can expect a vacuum that gives way to countries putting forward a flurry of digital barriers online, and that is not gonna be great news for the future of the open internet.
00:49:40.849 --> 00:49:43.594
Yeah, I think it's, it's a really important issue.
00:49:43.965 --> 00:49:49.094
you know, the US leadership About, digital free trade and an open internet has been really, really important.
00:49:49.094 --> 00:49:56.355
And the fact that the US has moved away from it under the past administration and potentially moving into this one as well, I think is a really big concern.
00:49:56.755 --> 00:49:59.244
we'll have a link to the letter.
00:49:59.476 --> 00:50:06.219
That the Internet Society sent along with the ACL U, center for Democracy and Technology, and also Freedom House.
00:50:06.429 --> 00:50:07.750
We'll have a link in the show notes.
00:50:07.822 --> 00:50:13.396
I think it's worth reading and hopefully we'll start to get some sense on this and we can protect the open internet.
00:50:13.755 --> 00:50:17.393
but, in the meantime, thank you so much for joining us for this conversation today.
00:50:17.661 --> 00:50:18.320
Thanks, Mike.
00:50:18.411 --> 00:50:19.460
It was great to talk to you.\
00:50:22.570 --> 00:50:24.710
Thanks for listening to Ctrl-Alt-Speech.
00:50:24.900 --> 00:50:28.090
Subscribe now to get our weekly episodes as soon as they're released.
00:50:28.889 --> 00:50:35.659
If your company or organization is interested in sponsoring the podcast, contact us by visiting ctrlaltspeech.Com.
00:50:35.849 --> 00:50:38.050
That's C T R L Alt Speech.
00:50:38.409 --> 00:50:38.739
com.
00:50:39.639 --> 00:50:52.710
This podcast is produced with financial support from the Future of Online Trust and Safety Fund, a fiscally sponsored multi donor fund at Global Impact that supports charitable activities to build a more robust, capable, and inclusive trust and safety ecosystem.