WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.310
You know what? A researcher said one
00:00:02.320 --> 00:00:04.350
time he was talking to a lot of people
00:00:04.360 --> 00:00:06.310
like me that like to look at research
00:00:06.320 --> 00:00:07.830
and then try to apply it to our clients
00:00:07.840 --> 00:00:08.870
because that's what I've done.
00:00:08.880 --> 00:00:09.230
>> Right.
00:00:09.240 --> 00:00:11.150
>> He said be very careful not to be an
00:00:11.160 --> 00:00:13.430
abstract researcher or an abstract
00:00:13.440 --> 00:00:16.470
scientist, right? To where I don't love
00:00:16.480 --> 00:00:18.510
I don't love what reading research. I
00:00:18.520 --> 00:00:20.590
can read the abstract and gather it, but
00:00:20.600 --> 00:00:22.590
what I found was exactly similar to what
00:00:22.600 --> 00:00:23.750
you're saying.
00:00:23.760 --> 00:00:24.990
If I didn't try and [clears throat]
00:00:25.000 --> 00:00:27.870
understand it myself, I was there might
00:00:27.880 --> 00:00:29.270
have been something else there. There's
00:00:29.280 --> 00:00:30.790
plenty of times that
00:00:30.800 --> 00:00:33.230
>> research has been shown to be wrong and
00:00:33.240 --> 00:00:34.830
and proven to be wrong because new
00:00:34.840 --> 00:00:36.670
research has then debunked what was the
00:00:36.680 --> 00:00:38.870
old research, but yeah, just not being
00:00:38.880 --> 00:00:41.110
an abstract researcher scientist or
00:00:41.120 --> 00:00:42.670
somebody that just reads the abstract.
00:00:42.680 --> 00:00:44.670
Like look into it and obviously you
00:00:44.680 --> 00:00:47.680
found something, so
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.310
You know what? A researcher said one
00:00:02.320 --> 00:00:04.350
time he was talking to a lot of people
00:00:04.360 --> 00:00:06.310
like me that like to look at research
00:00:06.320 --> 00:00:07.830
and then try to apply it to our clients
00:00:07.840 --> 00:00:08.870
because that's what I've done.
00:00:08.880 --> 00:00:09.230
>> Right.
00:00:09.240 --> 00:00:11.150
>> He said be very careful not to be an
00:00:11.160 --> 00:00:13.430
abstract researcher or an abstract
00:00:13.440 --> 00:00:16.470
scientist, right? To where I don't love
00:00:16.480 --> 00:00:18.510
I don't love what reading research. I
00:00:18.520 --> 00:00:20.590
can read the abstract and gather it, but
00:00:20.600 --> 00:00:22.590
what I found was exactly similar to what
00:00:22.600 --> 00:00:23.750
you're saying.
00:00:23.760 --> 00:00:24.990
If I didn't try and [clears throat]
00:00:25.000 --> 00:00:27.870
understand it myself, I was there might
00:00:27.880 --> 00:00:29.270
have been something else there. There's
00:00:29.280 --> 00:00:30.790
plenty of times that
00:00:30.800 --> 00:00:33.230
>> research has been shown to be wrong and
00:00:33.240 --> 00:00:34.830
and proven to be wrong because new
00:00:34.840 --> 00:00:36.670
research has then debunked what was the
00:00:36.680 --> 00:00:38.870
old research, but yeah, just not being
00:00:38.880 --> 00:00:41.110
an abstract researcher scientist or
00:00:41.120 --> 00:00:42.670
somebody that just reads the abstract.
00:00:42.680 --> 00:00:44.670
Like look into it and obviously you
00:00:44.680 --> 00:00:47.680
found something, so
