WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.230 --> 00:00:04.540
What's up everyone and welcome back to the program. Brian
2
00:00:04.559 --> 00:00:08.820
Kohlberger and his defense team have thrown everything they possibly
3
00:00:08.859 --> 00:00:12.259
can imagine at the prosecution in hopes of trying to
4
00:00:12.279 --> 00:00:15.300
get the death penalty thrown out, only to find Judge
5
00:00:15.339 --> 00:00:18.589
Hippler standing in their way every single time they bring
6
00:00:18.620 --> 00:00:21.949
a new motion. And unfortunately for Brian Kohlberger, that has
7
00:00:21.989 --> 00:00:24.670
not changed recently with the new orders that have hit
8
00:00:24.710 --> 00:00:28.070
the docket denying Brian Koberger and his team and their
9
00:00:28.089 --> 00:00:32.030
emotions to get this death penalty tossed. So today we're
10
00:00:32.049 --> 00:00:33.950
going to talk about that a little bit more. And
11
00:00:33.990 --> 00:00:37.439
to do that, we have an article from Fox News. Headline,
12
00:00:37.679 --> 00:00:41.359
Idaho judge slams Brian Koberger's hollow attempt to dodge death
13
00:00:41.380 --> 00:00:44.520
penalty and latest blow to the defense. This article was
14
00:00:44.600 --> 00:00:48.409
authored by Adam Sabes. A judge in Idaho denied a
15
00:00:48.450 --> 00:00:51.670
motion from Brian Koberger's defense team asking to remove the
16
00:00:51.710 --> 00:00:54.990
death penalty as a potential punishment if he's found guilty.
17
00:00:56.020 --> 00:00:58.929
Kohlberger is charged with first-degree murder in the deaths of
18
00:00:58.950 --> 00:01:02.689
four students in the University of Idaho, including Kaylee Gonsalves,
19
00:01:02.869 --> 00:01:07.430
Zanna Kernodle, Madison Mogan, and Ethan Chapin. The former student
20
00:01:07.469 --> 00:01:10.390
at the University of Washington was also charged with one
21
00:01:10.450 --> 00:01:14.510
felony count of burglary. During a hearing on April 9th,
22
00:01:14.569 --> 00:01:18.170
Kohlberger's defense team presented the motion to strike the death penalty,
23
00:01:18.650 --> 00:01:23.109
arguing that discovery produced by prosecutors has both been voluminous
24
00:01:23.420 --> 00:01:27.560
and unorganized. Kohlberger argued this meant he was unable to
25
00:01:27.599 --> 00:01:31.189
meaningfully review and investigate the evidence in preparation for trial,
26
00:01:31.530 --> 00:01:34.849
which is currently scheduled to begin in August. I mean,
27
00:01:34.870 --> 00:01:38.689
we're going on what, three, four years now? Stop with
28
00:01:38.709 --> 00:01:42.230
the whole I'm not prepared. Now look, everybody deserves a
29
00:01:42.269 --> 00:01:45.969
chance to defend themselves, even people that we might find condemnable.
30
00:01:47.189 --> 00:01:49.950
But at some point, the party has to get started.
31
00:01:51.439 --> 00:01:53.599
And my advice is, if you don't want to deal
32
00:01:53.659 --> 00:01:57.780
with a massive discovery, don't murder four people in their beds.
33
00:01:58.219 --> 00:02:00.459
Because if you do, well, you can expect that the
34
00:02:00.500 --> 00:02:03.079
process is not going to be favorable to you and
35
00:02:03.120 --> 00:02:05.840
that you're going to have to, at some point, stand
36
00:02:05.859 --> 00:02:09.979
before the wagon and take responsibility for what you allegedly did.
37
00:02:11.159 --> 00:02:13.099
I mean, if you flip the script and look at Diddy,
38
00:02:13.419 --> 00:02:16.080
look at how quickly his trial has come, as opposed
39
00:02:16.099 --> 00:02:18.919
to Brian Kohlberger's. Now, of course, two different things. We're
40
00:02:18.939 --> 00:02:22.219
talking about capital punishment here. and Diddy obviously were not.
41
00:02:22.960 --> 00:02:26.099
But still, Kohlberger's team has done nothing but gum up
42
00:02:26.139 --> 00:02:28.930
the works the whole entire time, and frankly, the state
43
00:02:28.939 --> 00:02:31.009
of Idaho has been more than fair when it comes
44
00:02:31.050 --> 00:02:35.189
to Brian Kohlberger. Judge Stephen Hippler wrote in his order
45
00:02:35.270 --> 00:02:38.370
on Tuesday that Kohlberger complaints about the amount of discovery
46
00:02:38.409 --> 00:02:42.710
produced ring hollow. Kohlberger has been receiving discovery in the
47
00:02:42.750 --> 00:02:46.110
same manner for over two years, Hippler wrote. Kohlberger has
48
00:02:46.169 --> 00:02:50.009
not sought additional resources to hire additional staff to review discovery,
49
00:02:50.439 --> 00:02:54.150
or obtain litigation document control software to help organize and
50
00:02:54.189 --> 00:02:57.879
sort the evidence. His lead counsel insisted that she will
51
00:02:57.930 --> 00:03:00.849
be allowed to take on a second high-profile capital case,
52
00:03:01.250 --> 00:03:05.009
despite the voluminous discovery in this case. So yeah, that's
53
00:03:05.050 --> 00:03:07.969
not good. You're going to say that you can't get
54
00:03:08.009 --> 00:03:10.110
things ready, but at the same time you're taking on
55
00:03:10.169 --> 00:03:13.930
another capital case? Sorry, but the judge isn't going to
56
00:03:13.969 --> 00:03:17.460
just acquiesce to your demands. This isn't about what's best
57
00:03:17.500 --> 00:03:19.659
for you. It's about what's best for the state of
58
00:03:19.759 --> 00:03:23.879
Idaho and the victims and their families. Hipler also wrote
59
00:03:23.939 --> 00:03:27.400
that Koberger's lawyer, Ann Taylor, indicated that her practice is
60
00:03:27.460 --> 00:03:31.400
to personally review all the discovery herself rather than rely
61
00:03:31.500 --> 00:03:34.659
on associates and staff to review materials to cut through
62
00:03:34.699 --> 00:03:38.180
the less relevant information and point to what materials need
63
00:03:38.219 --> 00:03:41.460
review by lead counsel. I don't have beef with that, honestly.
64
00:03:41.479 --> 00:03:45.030
I want my lawyer looking at everything. I don't want
65
00:03:45.060 --> 00:03:47.110
some hired intern to do it I don't want a
66
00:03:47.129 --> 00:03:49.699
paralegal to do it. I want my lawyer to do it.
67
00:03:50.009 --> 00:03:52.439
So I get that for sure. But at some point,
68
00:03:53.020 --> 00:03:55.479
there's only so much you can do. And when you're
69
00:03:55.520 --> 00:03:59.020
talking about a massive case like this, the time is now.
70
00:04:00.199 --> 00:04:03.439
These actions are not indicative of an overburdened defense team,
71
00:04:03.479 --> 00:04:06.909
Hitler wrote of the motion. Addressing one of the arguments
72
00:04:06.939 --> 00:04:12.110
from Kohlberger's team, the prosecutors larded its production with entirely
73
00:04:12.210 --> 00:04:15.590
irrelevant documents, Hitler said. There's no proof of that occurring.
74
00:04:16.670 --> 00:04:19.269
And of course, Brian Kohlberger fans are going to say, oh, well,
75
00:04:19.310 --> 00:04:22.850
the judge is against him. The judge isn't Brian Kohlberger's friend.
76
00:04:22.889 --> 00:04:25.069
He's looking to convict him. No, the judge is just
77
00:04:25.089 --> 00:04:31.560
doing his job. That's all. Pretty simple. Timeline of November 13th, 2022.
78
00:04:31.560 --> 00:04:35.899
4 a.m., suspect arrives at the house. Between 4 and 4.17,
79
00:04:35.899 --> 00:04:40.860
time of murders. 4.19, roommate calls. Three victims. No one answers. 4.22
80
00:04:40.860 --> 00:04:47.360
to 4.24, surviving roommate text each other. From inside the house. 427.
81
00:04:47.360 --> 00:04:53.180
Roommate calls victims again. No one answers. 432. Roommate texts Gonsalves,
82
00:04:53.220 --> 00:04:58.459
please answer. 1023. Surviving roommate texts victims. No one answers. 1139.
83
00:04:58.459 --> 00:05:03.399
Roommate calls her father. 12pm. 911 call placed from roommate's phone.
84
00:05:03.899 --> 00:05:06.730
Hippler's decision comes less than a week after he denied
85
00:05:06.750 --> 00:05:10.269
a different motion to remove the death penalty. Koberger's defense
86
00:05:10.310 --> 00:05:15.000
team previously argued... that the defendant's autism diagnosis should preclude
87
00:05:15.060 --> 00:05:17.660
him from the death penalty. And we all know how
88
00:05:17.699 --> 00:05:21.740
that worked out. Imagine trying to say your autism should
89
00:05:21.779 --> 00:05:24.459
preclude you from the death penalty. Now look, if Brian
90
00:05:24.480 --> 00:05:27.819
Kohlberger was somebody who, you know, was non-functioning or something
91
00:05:27.839 --> 00:05:30.970
like that, be a different story. This dude has a,
92
00:05:31.230 --> 00:05:35.129
you know, college degree, PhD candidate. So if he's capable
93
00:05:35.170 --> 00:05:37.310
of doing all of that, then don't tell me that
94
00:05:37.350 --> 00:05:40.939
the autism played a part in these alleged crimes. because
95
00:05:40.959 --> 00:05:44.220
I'm not buying that for a second. Alright, moving on
96
00:05:44.240 --> 00:05:48.079
to our second article of the day, this one from KXLY.com,
97
00:05:48.689 --> 00:05:51.850
and the headline, Prosecutors Want to Do Their Own Evaluation
98
00:05:51.870 --> 00:05:55.529
of Brian Koberger's Mental Health. This article was authored by
99
00:05:55.569 --> 00:06:00.709
Melissa Luck. Prosecutors who are putting Brian Koberger on trial
100
00:06:00.769 --> 00:06:04.170
for the murder of four University of Idaho students want
101
00:06:04.189 --> 00:06:07.079
to evaluate his mental health, but want to keep secret
102
00:06:07.120 --> 00:06:11.389
the tests and other information for Koberger's privacy. That's the
103
00:06:11.430 --> 00:06:13.870
right way to do it. Look, as the public, we're
104
00:06:13.910 --> 00:06:16.509
not all privy to that. And some things have to
105
00:06:16.550 --> 00:06:19.459
be kept, you know, in confidence. But I think it's
106
00:06:19.480 --> 00:06:21.439
a good idea for the state to have their own
107
00:06:21.519 --> 00:06:24.500
experts take a look at Kohlberger and see if everybody
108
00:06:24.519 --> 00:06:27.079
can get on the same page. And that might be
109
00:06:27.120 --> 00:06:30.649
helpful even, right? What if the state finds something that
110
00:06:30.730 --> 00:06:33.610
his experts missed? So I think it's a pretty good
111
00:06:33.709 --> 00:06:36.310
idea to have the state get a look at Brian
112
00:06:36.329 --> 00:06:39.250
Kohlberger as far as an evaluation of his mental state.
113
00:06:40.800 --> 00:06:44.160
Kohlberger faces the death penalty if convicted of killing Madison Mogan,
114
00:06:44.199 --> 00:06:49.220
Kaylee Gonsalves, Ethan Chapin, and Zanna Kernodel. The defense team
115
00:06:49.279 --> 00:06:53.100
says Kohlberger has recently been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder,
116
00:06:53.420 --> 00:06:56.420
but a judge ruled that diagnosis is not enough to
117
00:06:56.459 --> 00:07:00.399
remove the death penalty as a possible punishment. Prosecutors asked
118
00:07:00.439 --> 00:07:04.029
the judge to seal their motion to examine Kohlberger. And again,
119
00:07:04.050 --> 00:07:05.829
there's going to be people that aren't cool with that.
120
00:07:06.230 --> 00:07:08.589
They're going to want to see everything, and I understand
121
00:07:08.629 --> 00:07:12.399
that too. Look, I'm all for transparency, but I'm also
122
00:07:12.480 --> 00:07:15.399
for everybody getting a fair shake, even people that I
123
00:07:15.439 --> 00:07:18.100
might think or might be leaning towards them being guilty.
124
00:07:18.980 --> 00:07:21.800
And that certainly includes Brian Koberger. I've said it a
125
00:07:21.810 --> 00:07:24.589
million times. I have no axe to grind with this dude.
126
00:07:26.029 --> 00:07:28.829
And the prosecution better have their shit together, and they
127
00:07:28.850 --> 00:07:31.110
better be on point if they're going to try and
128
00:07:31.129 --> 00:07:35.209
put somebody to death. And so far, as far as
129
00:07:35.290 --> 00:07:38.959
I can tell, they most certainly have been. So this
130
00:07:39.040 --> 00:07:42.139
isn't one of those cases like we see over in
131
00:07:42.240 --> 00:07:46.439
Indiana with Richard Allen. Not in the least. And all
132
00:07:46.459 --> 00:07:49.389
these content creators out here that are pitching that shit,
133
00:07:49.750 --> 00:07:53.050
they're just trying to drive engagement. And frankly, my guess
134
00:07:53.129 --> 00:07:56.009
is the vast majority of these people pumping bullshit don't
135
00:07:56.050 --> 00:07:58.529
even believe it. They just know that there's an audience
136
00:07:58.569 --> 00:08:01.089
for it and they know that their sponsor for the
137
00:08:01.230 --> 00:08:04.439
ED pills or whatever the fuck they're pitching is going
138
00:08:04.459 --> 00:08:06.660
to give them some money if they get engagement. So
139
00:08:06.699 --> 00:08:09.560
they'll say whatever. But the facts don't bear out any
140
00:08:09.579 --> 00:08:11.870
of the bullshit. And that's why we go through these
141
00:08:11.899 --> 00:08:14.529
court documents. That way all of you get it right
142
00:08:14.550 --> 00:08:16.790
from the source. You don't need a third party to
143
00:08:16.829 --> 00:08:20.470
tell you. The court documents have all the information we need.
144
00:08:23.250 --> 00:08:27.180
Prosecutors wrote that the filing reveals mental health information about
145
00:08:27.240 --> 00:08:33.139
Koberger including psychological, psychiatric, and neurological information and diagnoses of
146
00:08:33.179 --> 00:08:36.980
the defendant. The filing also reveals the nature of mental
147
00:08:37.000 --> 00:08:40.659
conditions already conducted and the type of examinations and testing
148
00:08:40.679 --> 00:08:44.460
the state seeks to perform. Prosecutors wrote, some of which
149
00:08:44.600 --> 00:08:48.519
is personality testing to which the defendant objects. Yeah, I
150
00:08:48.539 --> 00:08:50.519
don't think he really is in a position to object.
151
00:08:51.039 --> 00:08:53.919
And I think that moving forward with the trial, the
152
00:08:53.960 --> 00:08:56.799
judge can obviously demand that he does it. He can
153
00:08:56.919 --> 00:09:01.370
order that Brian Kohlberger engages in this testing. And considering
154
00:09:01.409 --> 00:09:03.889
what we've seen from Hipler throughout this whole thing, I
155
00:09:03.929 --> 00:09:06.750
wouldn't be shocked to see him order this. I think
156
00:09:06.769 --> 00:09:10.639
it's a good idea. I think that Brian Kohlberger would
157
00:09:10.659 --> 00:09:14.580
be helped here, right? Because it gives him another professional
158
00:09:14.620 --> 00:09:17.379
to take a look at what's going on mentally. And
159
00:09:17.419 --> 00:09:19.960
maybe later on down the road, if something's found and
160
00:09:20.000 --> 00:09:23.019
he's convicted, he can use that as part of his appeal.
161
00:09:24.120 --> 00:09:27.080
So I think that Brian Kohlberger would be better served
162
00:09:27.480 --> 00:09:31.659
if he went under this other examination and got another opinion,
163
00:09:31.700 --> 00:09:33.789
a second opinion or third opinion, whatever it might be.
164
00:09:35.730 --> 00:09:40.210
The filing indicates the prosecution would use information gleaned from
165
00:09:40.250 --> 00:09:43.129
the exam in the death penalty phase, which is conducted
166
00:09:43.490 --> 00:09:47.559
if Kohlberger is convicted. Prosecutors in defense are due back
167
00:09:47.620 --> 00:09:50.659
in court in Boise in mid-May. The trial is scheduled
168
00:09:50.679 --> 00:09:53.679
to begin in August. So there's still a lot going
169
00:09:53.779 --> 00:09:56.129
on here. And we still don't have anywhere near enough
170
00:09:56.190 --> 00:09:58.889
information to know which way the wind is really blowing.
171
00:09:59.600 --> 00:10:02.620
but we're starting to get there and the more court
172
00:10:02.659 --> 00:10:05.059
documents that hit the docket the better serve we're going
173
00:10:05.080 --> 00:10:07.940
to be moving forward and obviously we still have a
174
00:10:07.980 --> 00:10:10.360
few months here before we get to the trial but
175
00:10:10.440 --> 00:10:13.289
things are in motion and there's a lot of decisions
176
00:10:13.330 --> 00:10:15.350
that are being made now that are going to loom
177
00:10:15.389 --> 00:10:19.230
large later on when this trial starts So like usual,
178
00:10:19.450 --> 00:10:21.950
we'll continue to follow along with all the twists and
179
00:10:21.990 --> 00:10:24.809
turns as we continue to follow along with the state
180
00:10:24.830 --> 00:10:28.789
of Idaho and the capital murder case brought against Brian Kohlberger.
181
00:10:29.750 --> 00:10:32.049
All of the information that goes with this episode can
182
00:10:32.090 --> 00:10:34.990
be found in the description box. What's up everyone and
183
00:10:35.049 --> 00:10:39.029
welcome back to the program. In this episode, we have
184
00:10:39.090 --> 00:10:42.250
a relatively short article to get to, one that's talking
185
00:10:42.309 --> 00:10:45.620
about the DNA and how the DNA could have led
186
00:10:45.629 --> 00:10:49.110
to Brian Kohlberger. However, this is a man with no
187
00:10:49.149 --> 00:10:52.269
criminal history, a man that was not in CODIS. So
188
00:10:52.909 --> 00:10:56.799
how did the DNA lead the police to him? Obviously,
189
00:10:56.840 --> 00:11:00.059
a lot goes into that. They have their investigation that
190
00:11:00.139 --> 00:11:02.039
tips them off that this might be the man they're
191
00:11:02.059 --> 00:11:06.330
looking for. And then from there, everything moves. They'll have
192
00:11:06.389 --> 00:11:09.269
a surveillance team put on them. They'll start following them
193
00:11:09.610 --> 00:11:11.490
and they'll try and collect his DNA one way or
194
00:11:11.509 --> 00:11:14.289
the other to get a match, especially if it doesn't
195
00:11:14.330 --> 00:11:18.820
hit inside of CODIS. And if you have no criminal history, obviously,
196
00:11:19.120 --> 00:11:22.659
you're not going to pop inside of that database. And
197
00:11:22.679 --> 00:11:26.139
Brian Koberger not having a criminal history certainly worked to
198
00:11:26.159 --> 00:11:32.009
his advantage, at least in the beginning. But eventually, the
199
00:11:32.029 --> 00:11:36.210
jig was up and Brian Koberger is now sitting behind
200
00:11:36.269 --> 00:11:41.620
bars and waiting to be extradited to Idaho. So let's
201
00:11:41.659 --> 00:11:44.389
get into this quick article here. And let's talk about
202
00:11:44.429 --> 00:11:48.669
the DNA a little bit more with retired FBI agent
203
00:11:49.190 --> 00:11:57.929
John McVeigh. This article was published on WPBF.com. Headline, Idaho
204
00:11:57.970 --> 00:12:01.960
murder suspect Brian Koberger has no criminal history and no
205
00:12:02.000 --> 00:12:06.320
car registered in his own name. Retired FBI agent says
206
00:12:06.379 --> 00:12:11.059
Koberger would not have been in the National DNA fingerprint database.
207
00:12:12.779 --> 00:12:17.250
This article was authored by Terry Parker. Definitely was critical.
208
00:12:17.299 --> 00:12:35.639
Not may have been. Definitely was critical. especially if he
209
00:12:35.659 --> 00:12:38.539
was found in possession of that vehicle, right? Very critical
210
00:12:38.580 --> 00:12:40.639
that he has the vehicle that was seen on the
211
00:12:40.659 --> 00:12:44.889
tape and obviously circumstantial until they can hammer the point home.
212
00:12:45.269 --> 00:12:48.350
But it gives them at least the basis for this
213
00:12:48.409 --> 00:12:52.220
investigation and probable cause. Remember, that's important. You have to
214
00:12:52.250 --> 00:12:57.009
have probable cause before you can make an arrest. Friday,
215
00:12:57.120 --> 00:13:00.559
Moscow police chief James Fry confirmed a white Hyundai Elantra
216
00:13:00.600 --> 00:13:03.639
was seized in Pennsylvania, where the FBI and state police
217
00:13:03.659 --> 00:13:08.019
SWAT teams arrested Koberger early Friday morning. And they came
218
00:13:08.059 --> 00:13:10.350
in at like 3 a.m. And that's how they do it.
219
00:13:10.559 --> 00:13:12.200
If they're going to raid your house, you better believe
220
00:13:12.220 --> 00:13:14.240
they're going to try and come in while you're sleeping.
221
00:13:15.950 --> 00:13:20.049
Retired Special Agent John McVeigh told investigative reporter Terry Parker
222
00:13:20.389 --> 00:13:23.269
that Koberger does not have a vehicle registered in his
223
00:13:23.309 --> 00:13:26.710
name and no criminal history, meaning while police were running
224
00:13:26.789 --> 00:13:29.610
DNA and fingerprint checks from the crime scene on the
225
00:13:29.649 --> 00:13:33.929
national database, Koberger would not have shown up as a match.
226
00:13:34.509 --> 00:13:36.570
And this is certainly how it goes. If you don't
227
00:13:36.590 --> 00:13:39.090
have a criminal history and you don't have a profile
228
00:13:39.129 --> 00:13:41.769
that's already been built in the system, well, there's no
229
00:13:41.789 --> 00:13:44.009
way for them to match that. So what they do
230
00:13:44.090 --> 00:13:46.070
is they hold on to that DNA that they collect.
231
00:13:46.470 --> 00:13:49.029
And then if they get a suspect, obviously try and
232
00:13:49.080 --> 00:13:51.179
match that DNA that was found at the crime scene
233
00:13:51.460 --> 00:13:54.940
to the suspect themselves. In this case, that's what they did.
234
00:13:57.029 --> 00:14:00.080
They would have found no criminal history, nothing in the database.
235
00:14:00.679 --> 00:14:03.440
And so if they linked him by some other means,
236
00:14:03.820 --> 00:14:06.279
then they would have probably set up surveillance on him,
237
00:14:06.559 --> 00:14:09.360
said McVeigh. And my guess is that they did. Once
238
00:14:09.379 --> 00:14:11.490
they had an idea of who he was and who
239
00:14:11.509 --> 00:14:14.289
they were looking for and had an idea where he
240
00:14:14.330 --> 00:14:18.789
was at, the surveillance would come very quickly. And usually
241
00:14:18.830 --> 00:14:21.860
it's the FBI that's doing something like that in this instance.
242
00:14:22.980 --> 00:14:24.940
And when we say surveillance, we're talking about the same
243
00:14:24.980 --> 00:14:28.799
guys who are working against terrorists and the mafia. And
244
00:14:28.840 --> 00:14:31.639
these guys and gals are the best at what they do.
245
00:14:33.090 --> 00:14:36.350
You could be walking around, go to a Taco Bell,
246
00:14:36.690 --> 00:14:38.929
get a drink, throw that drink in the trash, and
247
00:14:38.950 --> 00:14:40.909
they're going to come get that cup out of that
248
00:14:40.950 --> 00:14:44.440
trash to get your DNA from that cup. And that's
249
00:14:44.460 --> 00:14:47.059
what they do. They'll follow you around and try and
250
00:14:47.100 --> 00:14:49.799
collect DNA, try and build a profile on what you're
251
00:14:49.860 --> 00:14:52.470
up to, and you'll be none the wiser. And my
252
00:14:52.500 --> 00:14:54.909
guess is they also had a phone tap going for
253
00:14:54.929 --> 00:14:59.009
them as well. Possibly the Bureau would have done that
254
00:14:59.049 --> 00:15:01.809
for them, set up surveillance, and you wait until, you know,
255
00:15:01.870 --> 00:15:04.279
he spits on the ground, he drops the tissue, he's
256
00:15:04.340 --> 00:15:06.940
at a deli, and he takes a glass, something like that,
257
00:15:07.059 --> 00:15:10.259
said McVeigh, who said agents then would have to compare
258
00:15:10.320 --> 00:15:13.980
the DNA on the discarded item to the DNA at
259
00:15:14.019 --> 00:15:15.980
the crime scene. And we know there was a ton
260
00:15:16.019 --> 00:15:18.350
of that. According to the authorities, it was a messy
261
00:15:18.389 --> 00:15:21.350
crime scene, and a lot of DNA was at this
262
00:15:21.389 --> 00:15:24.059
crime scene. Now, what we don't know is how much
263
00:15:24.100 --> 00:15:28.360
of it, if any, was the killer's. But what we
264
00:15:28.379 --> 00:15:31.200
can read between the lines here is that they did
265
00:15:31.279 --> 00:15:34.019
find his DNA and they were able to match it
266
00:15:34.320 --> 00:15:37.870
to the crime scene. But what led them to zero
267
00:15:38.009 --> 00:15:41.769
in on Koberger? The critical tip police seemed to have
268
00:15:42.070 --> 00:15:45.730
was that white Elantra. They didn't say how much they
269
00:15:45.750 --> 00:15:48.309
knew about it or where it was spotted. But on
270
00:15:48.330 --> 00:15:51.860
December 7th, police put out a public plea for information
271
00:15:51.889 --> 00:15:55.320
about that car, and thousands of tips poured in about
272
00:15:55.360 --> 00:15:59.259
the Elantra. You would think that this guy, Kohlberger, would
273
00:15:59.279 --> 00:16:01.340
be hip to the fact that he's not going to
274
00:16:01.360 --> 00:16:03.080
be able to get away with this if he owns
275
00:16:03.120 --> 00:16:06.120
this car. Then you say to yourself, did he really
276
00:16:06.139 --> 00:16:08.100
want to get away with it, or was he looking
277
00:16:08.139 --> 00:16:10.700
for the notoriety that a lot of these serial killers
278
00:16:10.720 --> 00:16:14.519
look for when they're committing these murders? Maybe the vehicle
279
00:16:14.580 --> 00:16:17.220
wasn't seen that night of the murders, but maybe it
280
00:16:17.240 --> 00:16:20.100
was seen numerous other nights where somebody has a ring
281
00:16:20.120 --> 00:16:23.610
camera And they're like, well, wait a minute. This car
282
00:16:23.669 --> 00:16:26.490
doesn't belong on the street. But for five nights in
283
00:16:26.549 --> 00:16:28.840
a row, it's been sitting here. You know, nobody gets
284
00:16:28.960 --> 00:16:31.120
out of it or something like that. So is it
285
00:16:31.139 --> 00:16:34.600
a possibility? Yes. That he picked them for a reason,
286
00:16:34.860 --> 00:16:37.500
said McVeigh. And that's really the question that we all
287
00:16:37.539 --> 00:16:40.500
have still, right? At least me, especially. I want to
288
00:16:40.539 --> 00:16:43.230
know what the motivation was. I want to know why
289
00:16:43.289 --> 00:16:45.549
he chose them. And I want to know what his
290
00:16:45.629 --> 00:16:48.470
behavior was up to this point. Was he sitting out
291
00:16:48.509 --> 00:16:51.870
there staking it out? How did he choose them? All
292
00:16:51.909 --> 00:16:54.850
of that stuff, I hope, is going to come out
293
00:16:54.929 --> 00:16:59.710
later on down the line. McVeigh said, because of the
294
00:16:59.750 --> 00:17:02.330
violent nature of the stabbings, the killer could have been
295
00:17:02.370 --> 00:17:06.150
seeking revenge or had a vendetta against one of the victims.
296
00:17:06.890 --> 00:17:09.160
And I guess that could be the case, but what
297
00:17:09.180 --> 00:17:12.900
could it possibly be? It really doesn't seem like these people...
298
00:17:13.200 --> 00:17:17.630
who were murdered, meaning Kaylee, Ethan, Madison, and Zanna, would
299
00:17:17.670 --> 00:17:20.349
share the same social group as this guy. So how
300
00:17:20.369 --> 00:17:22.769
would they even run into him ever? How would they
301
00:17:22.829 --> 00:17:26.990
know him? Or he could have targeted the house itself
302
00:17:27.299 --> 00:17:29.319
because he knew it was easy to get in and
303
00:17:29.400 --> 00:17:32.160
out of and close to the highway for a quick getaway.
304
00:17:32.579 --> 00:17:35.400
And that's possible as well. You see, all of these scenarios,
305
00:17:35.700 --> 00:17:37.960
they're all on the table still. We just don't know.
306
00:17:38.930 --> 00:17:41.450
And until we find out, until we have an official
307
00:17:41.509 --> 00:17:45.529
report about what went down, what his motivations were, it's
308
00:17:45.549 --> 00:17:49.450
going to be a lot of speculation still. Koberger was
309
00:17:49.539 --> 00:17:52.400
a PhD student with the Department of Criminal Justice and
310
00:17:52.440 --> 00:17:56.940
Criminology at Washington State University and lives on campus in Pullman,
311
00:17:57.460 --> 00:18:00.920
just eight miles from the off-campus home in Moscow where
312
00:18:00.960 --> 00:18:05.069
the four students were stabbed to death last month. It's
313
00:18:05.119 --> 00:18:07.329
odd that he was getting a doctorate in criminal justice,
314
00:18:07.609 --> 00:18:11.660
noted McVeigh. Mostly, people who go into law enforcement don't
315
00:18:11.700 --> 00:18:15.569
do that. Well, that's an understatement, huh? But unless he
316
00:18:15.609 --> 00:18:17.549
had this kind of motivation and these thoughts for a
317
00:18:17.569 --> 00:18:19.990
very long time, and he thought that going to these
318
00:18:20.069 --> 00:18:22.890
classes would aid him in getting away with it or
319
00:18:22.970 --> 00:18:26.210
planning out the murders better, we just don't know. But
320
00:18:26.289 --> 00:18:28.289
one thing I will tell you is this. If you're
321
00:18:28.329 --> 00:18:31.289
crazy enough to murder four people while they're sleeping in
322
00:18:31.329 --> 00:18:34.789
their beds, I don't put anything by you. You're literally
323
00:18:34.829 --> 00:18:40.970
capable of anything, in my opinion. Kohlberger's parents live in
324
00:18:40.990 --> 00:18:45.309
a gated neighborhood in his hometown of Albrightville, Pennsylvania. His
325
00:18:45.369 --> 00:18:48.329
parents and sisters did not answer their phones when called.
326
00:18:48.970 --> 00:18:52.779
Kohlberger will appear in court on Tuesday for extradition proceedings
327
00:18:53.140 --> 00:18:55.359
and details on what led to his arrest will be
328
00:18:55.420 --> 00:18:59.019
unsealed once he is brought back to Idaho to face charges.
329
00:18:59.460 --> 00:19:02.130
Now that's going to be very interesting. It's going to
330
00:19:02.150 --> 00:19:04.950
be very interesting to see what the probable cause was,
331
00:19:05.190 --> 00:19:07.730
what the arrest affidavit has to say, and all of
332
00:19:07.769 --> 00:19:10.690
the other court paperwork that has to be submitted when
333
00:19:10.710 --> 00:19:14.210
you have somebody like this who's facing charges. Now, that
334
00:19:14.250 --> 00:19:16.910
doesn't mean that they're not going to seal it. We
335
00:19:16.950 --> 00:19:21.529
saw down in Delphi a lot of sealing, a lot
336
00:19:21.549 --> 00:19:24.940
of redactions, and that was to protect the integrity of
337
00:19:24.980 --> 00:19:29.099
the case. So with as adamant as they have been
338
00:19:29.440 --> 00:19:32.400
about protecting the integrity of the case here, I wouldn't
339
00:19:32.420 --> 00:19:34.400
be shocked to see them try and have some sealing
340
00:19:34.829 --> 00:19:38.710
and some redactions to the documents that are released to
341
00:19:38.730 --> 00:19:41.609
the public. Now, do I know that's going to happen
342
00:19:41.630 --> 00:19:44.509
for sure? I don't. But we have seen it happen before,
343
00:19:44.829 --> 00:19:46.970
and there is precedent for that if you're trying to
344
00:19:47.009 --> 00:19:49.930
keep the case a little bit more secretive until you
345
00:19:50.299 --> 00:19:53.980
you're ready to really unleash and let the prosecution go wild.
346
00:19:54.769 --> 00:19:56.569
So it's going to be interesting to see what happens
347
00:19:56.609 --> 00:19:59.200
here as far as that goes. and if they're going
348
00:19:59.240 --> 00:20:02.279
to be transparent with the arrest affidavit, or if we're
349
00:20:02.299 --> 00:20:05.109
going to have some seals. So we'll keep our eye
350
00:20:05.190 --> 00:20:09.269
on it, obviously. And as this new information unfolds, as
351
00:20:09.329 --> 00:20:12.289
this story evolves, we'll be here every step of the way,
352
00:20:12.569 --> 00:20:15.480
like we have been from the beginning, waiting on the
353
00:20:15.519 --> 00:20:20.500
train of justice to come slamming down the tracks. All right, folks,
354
00:20:20.519 --> 00:20:22.099
that's going to do it for this one. If you'd
355
00:20:22.119 --> 00:20:24.799
like to contact me, you can do that at BobbyCapucci
356
00:20:25.140 --> 00:20:33.289
at ProtonMail.com. That's B-O-B-B-Y-C-A-P-U-C-C-I at ProtonMail.com. You can also find
357
00:20:33.329 --> 00:20:39.470
me on Twitter at B-O-B-B-Y underscore C-A-P-U-C-C-I. The link that
358
00:20:39.529 --> 00:20:43.849
I discussed can be found in the description box. Home health, baby, baby.
359
00:20:44.470 --> 00:20:48.140
What's up, everyone? And welcome back to the program. In
360
00:20:48.180 --> 00:20:50.859
this episode, we're going to dive right back into the
361
00:20:50.900 --> 00:20:54.519
court documents. And this time, we're looking at the objection
362
00:20:54.779 --> 00:21:00.000
by Brian Kohlberger to appeal, amend, and or clarify the
363
00:21:00.099 --> 00:21:04.849
non-dissemination order. And this is the argument that Brian Kohlberger's
364
00:21:04.890 --> 00:21:08.390
team is making as to why the non-dissemination order should
365
00:21:08.430 --> 00:21:12.630
stay in place. So, let's get to it. Case number CR29-22.
366
00:21:15.210 --> 00:21:19.380
Dash zero zero zero two eight zero five. The state
367
00:21:19.390 --> 00:21:25.440
of Idaho plaintiff versus Brian C. Koberger, the defendant. Comes now.
368
00:21:26.000 --> 00:21:29.920
Brian C. Koberger, by and through their attorney, J. Weston Lodgson,
369
00:21:30.299 --> 00:21:34.170
chief deputy of litigation, and hereby objects to the motion
370
00:21:34.309 --> 00:21:39.430
to appeal, amend and or clarify the non-dissemination order filed
371
00:21:39.470 --> 00:21:43.500
by Shannon Gray as counsel for the Gonsalves family. This
372
00:21:43.599 --> 00:21:47.289
objection is made on the grounds that the non-dissemination order
373
00:21:47.630 --> 00:21:52.230
properly requires Mr. Gray to abide by the clear requirement
374
00:21:52.529 --> 00:21:56.210
of the ethical rules of this state. And remember, they're
375
00:21:56.250 --> 00:21:59.660
having their hearing on May 22nd. So they're going to
376
00:21:59.690 --> 00:22:02.720
get this hammered out or at least get the discussion going.
377
00:22:04.079 --> 00:22:10.420
Argument Section 1 The court's order is not volitive of Mr.
378
00:22:10.480 --> 00:22:14.410
Gray's First Amendment rights. In his memorandum of support of
379
00:22:14.490 --> 00:22:19.240
motion for appeal and or clarification of amended non-dissemination order,
380
00:22:19.680 --> 00:22:24.559
hereafter memorandum, Mr. Gray contends that because his clients, the
381
00:22:24.599 --> 00:22:30.359
Gonsalves family, are classified as non-party citizens, application of the
382
00:22:30.420 --> 00:22:35.579
court's non-dissemination order to him constitutes a prior restraint on
383
00:22:35.619 --> 00:22:38.990
his right to free speech under the First Amendment. In
384
00:22:39.049 --> 00:22:42.390
support of this position, Mr. Gray cites the fair trial
385
00:22:42.779 --> 00:22:47.299
and public disclosure provision of the ABA Standard for Criminal Justice,
386
00:22:47.759 --> 00:22:53.240
IRPC 3.6, as well as the precedent established under Shepard v. Maxwell,
387
00:22:53.240 --> 00:22:56.369
384 U.S. 333, 1966, Nebraska Press Association v. Stewart, 427 U.S. 539, 1976,
388
00:22:56.369 --> 00:23:09.579
and Gentile v. the State Bar of Nevada, 501 U.S.
389
00:23:09.579 --> 00:23:14.259
1030 1991. The issue at hand may be summarized as follows,
390
00:23:14.740 --> 00:23:19.140
whether application of a non-dissemination order to an attorney representing
391
00:23:19.180 --> 00:23:23.740
the family of an alleged murder victim constitutes an intolerable
392
00:23:23.819 --> 00:23:29.119
prior restraint on speech. The First Amendment prohibits laws abridging
393
00:23:29.160 --> 00:23:31.990
the freedom of speech, while the Six guarantees to the
394
00:23:32.029 --> 00:23:35.289
criminal defendant the right to a speedy and public trial
395
00:23:35.930 --> 00:23:40.720
by an impartial jury. Occasionally in conflict, where protected pretrial
396
00:23:40.759 --> 00:23:44.880
expression threatens the impartiality of the jury, the United States
397
00:23:44.900 --> 00:23:49.109
Supreme Court has determined certain parties' First Amendment rights may
398
00:23:49.150 --> 00:23:52.829
be limited when exercise of those rights would result in
399
00:23:52.890 --> 00:23:56.559
prejudice to the defendant, noting, with their life at stake,
400
00:23:56.880 --> 00:23:59.970
it is not requiring too much that the defendant be
401
00:24:00.029 --> 00:24:04.289
tried in an atmosphere undisturbed by so huge a wave
402
00:24:04.369 --> 00:24:07.470
of public passion. Shepard, 384 U.S. at 351, quoting Irvin v. Dowd,
403
00:24:07.470 --> 00:24:08.970
266 U.S. 717, 728, and 1961, as a means of
404
00:24:08.990 --> 00:24:12.329
reducing the appearance of prejudicial material and to protect the
405
00:24:12.690 --> 00:24:27.430
jury from outside influence. A trial court, may prescribe extrajudicial
406
00:24:27.490 --> 00:24:31.650
statements by any lawyer, party, witness, or court official, and
407
00:24:31.690 --> 00:24:36.460
may also promulgate a regulation with respect to dissemination of
408
00:24:36.500 --> 00:24:44.710
information of information about the case. Shepard 384 U.S. at 358-62.
409
00:24:45.220 --> 00:24:48.539
In either case, the cure lies in those remedial measures
410
00:24:48.799 --> 00:24:52.579
that will prevent the prejudice at its inception. ID 384 U.S.
411
00:24:54.380 --> 00:24:59.500
at 363. One such measure is at issue here. As
412
00:24:59.619 --> 00:25:03.640
in Stewart, this court is presented with a confrontation between
413
00:25:03.720 --> 00:25:08.670
prior restraint imposed to protect one vital constitutional guarantee and
414
00:25:08.710 --> 00:25:12.230
the explicit command of another that the freedom to speak
415
00:25:12.509 --> 00:25:15.029
shall not be abridged. Stewart, 427 U.S. at 570. Unlike
416
00:25:15.079 --> 00:25:22.039
in Stewart, however, The regulation at issue is as to
417
00:25:22.099 --> 00:25:26.039
an attorney who may be subjected to greater limitations than
418
00:25:26.099 --> 00:25:29.599
could be imposed on the press, as the Supreme Court
419
00:25:29.660 --> 00:25:33.660
noted in Shepard. The court must take such steps by
420
00:25:33.740 --> 00:25:38.650
rule and regulation that will protect their processes from prejudicial
421
00:25:38.789 --> 00:25:44.849
outside interferences. Neither prosecutors. counsels for defense, the accused, witnesses,
422
00:25:45.130 --> 00:25:49.170
court staff, nor enforcement officers coming under the jurisdiction of
423
00:25:49.210 --> 00:25:53.710
the court should be permitted to frustrate its function. Collaboration
424
00:25:53.750 --> 00:25:57.349
between counsel and the press as to information affecting the
425
00:25:57.410 --> 00:26:01.369
fairness of a criminal trial is not only subject to regulation,
426
00:26:01.650 --> 00:26:10.880
but is highly censorable and worthy of disciplinary action. Shepard 384, U.S. 363.
427
00:26:10.880 --> 00:26:15.200
This holding was expressly upheld in genteel, wherein the Supreme
428
00:26:15.240 --> 00:26:19.000
Court found the speech of lawyers representing clients in pending
429
00:26:19.019 --> 00:26:23.470
cases may be regulated under a less demanding standard than
430
00:26:23.529 --> 00:26:28.009
that established for regulation of the press in Stewart and
431
00:26:28.049 --> 00:26:32.230
the cases which preceded it. Lawyers representing clients in pending
432
00:26:32.250 --> 00:26:36.329
cases are key participants in the criminal justice system and
433
00:26:36.369 --> 00:26:39.910
the state may demand some adherence to the precepts of
434
00:26:39.970 --> 00:26:43.829
that system in regulating their speech as well as their conduct.
435
00:26:44.430 --> 00:26:49.680
Gentile 501 U.S. at 1074. In an attempt to exclude
436
00:26:49.700 --> 00:26:53.299
himself from these holdings, Mr. Gray argues that because his
437
00:26:53.359 --> 00:26:56.759
clients are not parties to the case and therefore are
438
00:26:56.799 --> 00:27:00.079
not subject to the order, see Memorandum page 3, 6
439
00:27:00.079 --> 00:27:03.269
and 8, he too is due an equal measure of
440
00:27:03.369 --> 00:27:06.930
deference and exclusion. The weight of authority is contrary to
441
00:27:06.990 --> 00:27:12.910
his position. In Idaho State Bar v. TAP 129 Idaho
442
00:27:12.910 --> 00:27:20.589
414 925 P. 2D 1113 1996, the Idaho Supreme Court made
443
00:27:20.630 --> 00:27:24.759
it clear that courts must strike a reasonable balance between
444
00:27:24.779 --> 00:27:28.039
the right of free speech and the state's legitimate interest
445
00:27:28.339 --> 00:27:32.240
in preserving the integrity of its judicial system. TAP 129
446
00:27:32.240 --> 00:27:41.289
Idaho 414 at 417-925-P.2D at 1116. In reaching this conclusion,
447
00:27:41.569 --> 00:27:45.160
the TAP court relied upon the genteel decision, which, in
448
00:27:45.180 --> 00:27:48.420
the court's words, balanced the state's interest in assuring fair
449
00:27:48.460 --> 00:27:53.559
trials against the free speech interests of attorneys. Thus, a
450
00:27:53.579 --> 00:27:58.500
case associated, speaker's status as a lawyer's, alters the degree
451
00:27:58.740 --> 00:28:02.950
to which their speech is protected. This lawyer versus non-lawyer
452
00:28:02.990 --> 00:28:07.349
distinction is recognized broadly elsewhere, even in cases where the
453
00:28:07.410 --> 00:28:10.609
speaker attorney claims not to be involved with the case
454
00:28:10.849 --> 00:28:18.259
in question. Good, 821 F. 3D, 553 Fifth Circuit, 2016. The
455
00:28:19.059 --> 00:28:22.539
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals considered whether an attorney who
456
00:28:22.579 --> 00:28:26.519
routinely communicated with and occasionally passed notes to the defense
457
00:28:26.799 --> 00:28:30.250
could be sanctioned for violation of of a non-dissemination order
458
00:28:30.589 --> 00:28:34.089
and the Louisiana criminal trial publicity rule because he was
459
00:28:34.150 --> 00:28:38.390
not a lawyer associated with the defense or trial participants.
460
00:28:39.089 --> 00:28:43.369
Application to whom, Good argued, the local rule was limited.
461
00:28:44.049 --> 00:28:50.069
Good 821 F. 3D at 557. Rejecting Good's argument, the court
462
00:28:50.109 --> 00:28:54.930
relied upon Gentile's own language that because associated lawyers have
463
00:28:54.990 --> 00:28:59.539
special access to information and Through discovery and client communications,
464
00:28:59.980 --> 00:29:03.759
their extrajudicial statements pose a threat to the fairness of
465
00:29:03.819 --> 00:29:07.220
a pending proceeding since lawyer's statements are likely to be
466
00:29:07.279 --> 00:29:17.490
received as especially authoritative. Similar holdings have been reached across
467
00:29:17.529 --> 00:29:27.660
the circuit courts. See Mezabal v. Allen, 411F. 3D. 712, 6th Circuit, 2005. Morrissey, 168. F. 3D, 134.
468
00:29:27.650 --> 00:29:30.799
Fourth Circuit, 1999. Berner vs. Del Honte, 129. F. 3D, 20.
469
00:29:30.799 --> 00:29:53.299
First Circuit. U.S. vs. Cutler, 58. Further, the 11th and
470
00:29:53.599 --> 00:29:58.660
2nd Circuits have interpreted the heavy presumption against constitutionality described
471
00:29:58.700 --> 00:30:02.869
in Stewart as being unique to prior restraints directed to
472
00:30:02.890 --> 00:30:07.009
the press and suggested the Supreme Court's shepherd holding as
473
00:30:07.069 --> 00:30:13.019
suggesting a restrictive order limiting extrajudicial commentary of trial participants
474
00:30:13.470 --> 00:30:16.680
as an alternative to a prior restraint on the media.
475
00:30:17.819 --> 00:30:24.009
The News Journal Corp. v. Foxman, 939 F. 2F, 1499, 1512-13,
476
00:30:24.990 --> 00:30:33.730
11th Circuit, 1991. See also ZAL 968 F. 2D at 928.
477
00:30:33.730 --> 00:30:37.950
Lawyers representing clients in pending cases may be regulated under
478
00:30:37.990 --> 00:30:41.690
a less demanding standard than that established for regulation of
479
00:30:41.730 --> 00:30:47.440
the press. quoting Gentile at 501, U.S. at 1074. As
480
00:30:47.519 --> 00:30:51.289
in good, Mr. Gray has special access to information via
481
00:30:51.329 --> 00:30:55.589
his clients. Dissemination of information forbidden by the court's order
482
00:30:55.890 --> 00:30:59.390
would be deemed authoritative as a result of this access
483
00:30:59.910 --> 00:31:03.799
and Mr. Gray's status as an attorney, and therefore would
484
00:31:03.859 --> 00:31:08.440
endanger the jury's impartiality. The court's exemption of Mr. Gray's
485
00:31:08.500 --> 00:31:13.339
client's from its order effectively answers Mr. Gray's First Amendment concerns,
486
00:31:13.799 --> 00:31:17.400
while its continued application to him accounts for his apparent
487
00:31:17.440 --> 00:31:24.420
authority and special access to the facts. Section 2. IRPC 3.6
488
00:31:24.420 --> 00:31:27.839
is not fashionably vague nor vague as applied to Mr.
489
00:31:27.900 --> 00:31:32.289
Gray's circumstances. Mr. Gray then argues that even if the
490
00:31:32.390 --> 00:31:35.930
court may order him not to disseminate information to the press,
491
00:31:36.450 --> 00:31:41.579
because the court's order mirrors the language of of IRPC 3.6
492
00:31:41.579 --> 00:31:44.279
it is vague on its face and as applied to
493
00:31:44.319 --> 00:31:49.509
his circumstances first IRPC 3.6 in no way is vague
494
00:31:49.809 --> 00:31:53.250
on its face Mr. Gray's argument on this point is
495
00:31:53.349 --> 00:31:57.250
premised on a faulty understanding and misreading of the genteel
496
00:31:57.289 --> 00:32:01.630
holding and genteel the Supreme Court expressly stated we are
497
00:32:01.670 --> 00:32:06.490
not called upon to determine the constitutionality of ABA model
498
00:32:06.529 --> 00:32:12.150
rule 3.6 1981 but only Rule 117 as it has
499
00:32:12.190 --> 00:32:16.990
been interpreted and applied by the state of Nevada. Gentile
500
00:32:16.990 --> 00:32:22.190
501 U.S. at 1036. Moreover, the Supreme Court held nothing
501
00:32:22.250 --> 00:32:27.029
inherent in Nevada's formulation of the trial publicity rule fails
502
00:32:27.109 --> 00:32:32.119
First Amendment review. But as this case demonstrates, Rule 117
503
00:32:32.119 --> 00:32:36.240
has not been interpreted in conformance with those principles by
504
00:32:36.279 --> 00:32:41.180
the Nevada Supreme Court. Gray's assertion that Gentile's court held
505
00:32:41.220 --> 00:32:45.710
that the wording of Rules 3.6 and 3.8 was unconstitutionally
506
00:32:45.769 --> 00:32:50.349
vague is simply wrong, because Gentile only found that the
507
00:32:50.410 --> 00:32:55.099
rule was unconstitutional as applied. That decision does not mandate
508
00:32:55.130 --> 00:33:00.240
a similar finding when evaluating IRPC 3.6. To the contrary,
509
00:33:00.660 --> 00:33:05.319
the Supreme Court's expressed finding that nothing inherent In Nevada's rule,
510
00:33:05.640 --> 00:33:09.819
failed First Amendment review indicates that the same conclusion is
511
00:33:09.880 --> 00:33:15.059
appropriate with regard to IRPC 3.6, which, as Mr. Gray
512
00:33:15.099 --> 00:33:20.339
himself states, is similar in wording to ABA Rule 3.6. Mr.
513
00:33:20.380 --> 00:33:26.289
Gray's argument that IRPC 3.6 is unconstitutionally vague as applied
514
00:33:26.349 --> 00:33:31.250
to his own circumstances is also faulty. In Gentile, the
515
00:33:31.289 --> 00:33:35.150
Supreme Court found that one central point must dominate the
516
00:33:35.230 --> 00:33:40.309
court as applied vagueness analysis. This case involves political speech.
517
00:33:40.789 --> 00:33:44.420
At issue here is the constitutionality of a ban on
518
00:33:44.460 --> 00:33:50.059
political speech, critical of the government and its officials. Gentile
519
00:33:50.059 --> 00:33:53.799
501 U.S. at 1034. Well, it is true that Mr.
520
00:33:53.880 --> 00:33:57.420
Gray and the Gonsalves family have criticized the police in
521
00:33:57.460 --> 00:34:01.119
this matter in the past, Since Mr. Koberger's arrest, their
522
00:34:01.180 --> 00:34:06.369
statements have been focused on him. CEG King 5, father
523
00:34:06.430 --> 00:34:12.050
of Idaho murder victim, says Koberger was overwhelmed in court. Additionally,
524
00:34:12.469 --> 00:34:15.849
at issue in Gentile was the confusion created by the
525
00:34:15.889 --> 00:34:22.059
Safe Harbor exception for statements by the defense about their defense. Mr.
526
00:34:22.099 --> 00:34:25.199
Gray has essentially agreed his client is not a real
527
00:34:25.239 --> 00:34:27.820
party to this action and has nothing similar to a
528
00:34:27.860 --> 00:34:31.889
defendant's interest in sharing their defense with the press. Thus,
529
00:34:32.170 --> 00:34:36.289
the vagueness found in Gentile's in opposite to his concerns.
530
00:34:37.110 --> 00:34:41.909
Section 3. As an attorney, Mr. Gray cannot claim vicarious
531
00:34:41.969 --> 00:34:45.800
exemption from the rules of professional conduct and is therefore
532
00:34:45.860 --> 00:34:51.559
bound by IRPC 3.6. Finally, Mr. Gray asserts that he
533
00:34:51.619 --> 00:34:55.219
is allowed to relay to the media any of the opinions, views,
534
00:34:55.280 --> 00:34:59.139
or statements of those family members regarding any any part
535
00:34:59.280 --> 00:35:03.039
of the case, regardless of the rules of professional conduct,
536
00:35:03.380 --> 00:35:06.320
because it would place an undue burden on the victim's
537
00:35:06.360 --> 00:35:10.420
families if the attorney whom they retained to represent their
538
00:35:10.500 --> 00:35:15.099
interests was prohibited from serving as their spokesperson to the
539
00:35:15.139 --> 00:35:19.199
media and other parties in transmitting the victim's family's thoughts
540
00:35:19.659 --> 00:35:24.179
and opinions. His assertion of vicarious exemption from the rules
541
00:35:24.239 --> 00:35:28.789
of professional conduct is plainly baseless. You made this happen.
542
00:35:29.429 --> 00:35:34.230
Besides being entirely inconsistent with the above provided precedent, Mr.
543
00:35:34.309 --> 00:35:37.889
Gray's position on this issue is contrary to the long-held
544
00:35:37.929 --> 00:35:42.219
acknowledgement that, even outside the courtroom, lawyers in pending cases
545
00:35:42.659 --> 00:35:46.659
are subject to ethical restrictions on speech, which an ordinary
546
00:35:46.719 --> 00:35:51.260
citizen would not be. Such as has always been the case,
547
00:35:51.860 --> 00:35:56.280
as membership in the bar is a privilege burdened with conditions. Third,
548
00:35:56.340 --> 00:35:58.780
versus the United States, 354 U.S., 278, 281, 1957. Quoting in, Rouse, 221,
549
00:35:58.760 --> 00:35:59.940
New York, 81, 84, 116, NE, 782, 783, 1917. Boy,
550
00:35:59.960 --> 00:36:03.679
going all the way back to 1917 for that precedent, huh? Mr.
551
00:36:03.679 --> 00:36:06.739
Gray's representation of the Gonsalves family does not entitle him
552
00:36:06.760 --> 00:36:24.619
to the same degree of freedom of speech... they enjoy
553
00:36:24.760 --> 00:36:28.219
as ordinary citizens. Further, Mr. Gray makes it clear that,
554
00:36:28.760 --> 00:36:31.599
if his motion is granted, he will comment on the
555
00:36:31.639 --> 00:36:37.980
case and other issues surrounding the investigation pursuant to Rule 3.6.
556
00:36:37.980 --> 00:36:41.619
What portion of Rule 3.6 Mr. Gray invokes here is
557
00:36:41.659 --> 00:36:45.710
an open question. Insofar as the rule addresses Mr. Gray's
558
00:36:45.750 --> 00:36:49.969
intended subject matter, it expressly identifies it as a subject
559
00:36:50.340 --> 00:36:54.670
more likely than not to have material prejudicial effect on
560
00:36:54.710 --> 00:36:58.630
a proceeding, particularly when they refer to a criminal matter
561
00:36:59.090 --> 00:37:05.530
or any other proceeding that could result in incarceration. IRPC 3.6,
562
00:37:05.530 --> 00:37:09.409
comment number 5. Indeed, the rule notes that criminal jury
563
00:37:09.449 --> 00:37:15.559
trials will be most sensitive to extrajudicial speech. IRPC 3.6,
564
00:37:15.559 --> 00:37:19.130
comment number 6. Mr. Gray argues he will not be
565
00:37:19.210 --> 00:37:22.730
offering up his own opinion regarding the facts surrounding the case,
566
00:37:23.250 --> 00:37:27.789
but rather only serving as his client's spokesperson conduit to
567
00:37:27.829 --> 00:37:31.679
the media and other parties in transmitting the victim's family's
568
00:37:31.739 --> 00:37:36.480
thoughts and opinions. Far from mitigating the already tenuous nature
569
00:37:36.519 --> 00:37:40.239
of this argument, this signal of intent again places Mr.
570
00:37:40.300 --> 00:37:44.849
Gray at odds with Rule 3.6 and Gentile. the court
571
00:37:45.070 --> 00:37:48.829
has already exempted Mr. Gray's clients from its order, adequately
572
00:37:48.889 --> 00:37:53.349
preserving their First Amendment rights. To extend this exemption to Mr.
573
00:37:53.409 --> 00:37:58.230
Gray would function solely to grant potentially prejudicial statements, the
574
00:37:58.269 --> 00:38:02.159
weight recognized as a danger by the genteel court on
575
00:38:02.219 --> 00:38:07.639
a subject the rule distinguishes as already extremely susceptible to prejudice.
576
00:38:08.139 --> 00:38:11.579
If Mr. Gray truly intends only to voice his clients'
577
00:38:11.619 --> 00:38:15.849
thoughts and opinions... then the court's previous exemption has already
578
00:38:15.949 --> 00:38:20.150
cured the supposed First Amendment infirmity. Mr. Gray's clients may
579
00:38:20.230 --> 00:38:23.489
voice these thoughts and opinions themselves as they clearly have
580
00:38:23.510 --> 00:38:26.889
been doing. The sole effect of maintaining the court's order
581
00:38:27.250 --> 00:38:31.030
in present form is the continued operation of a remedial
582
00:38:31.110 --> 00:38:35.800
measure that prevents prejudice at its inception. Mr. Gray is
583
00:38:35.860 --> 00:38:38.940
bound by the rules of professional conduct and the First
584
00:38:38.980 --> 00:38:43.050
Amendment does not excuse him from that obligation. This was
585
00:38:43.130 --> 00:38:47.750
dated February 8th, and it was signed by Jay Lodson,
586
00:38:48.769 --> 00:38:54.250
the chief deputy litigation assigned attorney to Brian Kohlberger. All right, folks.
587
00:38:54.289 --> 00:38:57.550
So with this hearing coming up about this issue, I
588
00:38:57.590 --> 00:39:00.250
thought this would be a solid add to the catalog
589
00:39:00.269 --> 00:39:03.369
to give us an idea of what the argument is here.
590
00:39:03.880 --> 00:39:07.360
And obviously, after they have this hearing on May 22nd,
591
00:39:07.639 --> 00:39:10.679
we'll have an episode breaking it all down. But until then,
592
00:39:11.039 --> 00:39:14.670
we'll continue to swim through this muck looking for some clarity.
593
00:39:15.449 --> 00:39:17.190
All right, folks, that's going to do it for this one.
594
00:39:17.610 --> 00:39:20.190
All of the information that goes with the episode can
595
00:39:20.230 --> 00:39:23.820
be found in the description box. And welcome back to
596
00:39:23.860 --> 00:39:29.619
the program. So Brian Koberger is requesting more time to decide.
597
00:39:30.139 --> 00:39:33.320
about offering an alibi. And how do we know that?
598
00:39:33.599 --> 00:39:36.940
Because there were new court filings that hit the docket.
599
00:39:37.940 --> 00:39:42.139
And these new filings occurred on Monday. So they're definitely
600
00:39:42.400 --> 00:39:45.519
working behind the scenes double time in the camp of
601
00:39:45.539 --> 00:39:50.260
Brian Koberger, trying to formulate a strategy for a defense here. Now,
602
00:39:50.400 --> 00:39:52.639
what they're going to come up with, your guess is
603
00:39:52.739 --> 00:39:55.320
as good as mine, because as much as I've racked
604
00:39:55.360 --> 00:39:58.000
my brain and tried to play the devil's advocate here,
605
00:39:58.739 --> 00:40:02.360
I don't know how Brian Kohlberger plans to explain away
606
00:40:02.920 --> 00:40:05.539
all of the evidence that has been presented thus far
607
00:40:05.860 --> 00:40:09.280
against them, never mind what they have hidden up their sleeve.
608
00:40:10.059 --> 00:40:13.530
So today, we have an article from ABC News and
609
00:40:13.550 --> 00:40:18.030
the headline. Idaho College murder suspect Brian Kohlberger requests more
610
00:40:18.070 --> 00:40:23.010
time to decide offering an alibi. This article was authored
611
00:40:23.070 --> 00:40:28.239
by Sasha Pezenik. The man accused of killing four Idaho
612
00:40:28.280 --> 00:40:31.420
College students is asking the court for more time to
613
00:40:31.460 --> 00:40:35.019
decide whether to offer an alibi as he prepares to
614
00:40:35.059 --> 00:40:39.139
mount his defense at trial this fall, according to new
615
00:40:39.179 --> 00:40:43.340
court documents. Brian Kohlberger's lawyer said in a motion filed Friday,
616
00:40:43.820 --> 00:40:48.510
That because of the voluminous discovery process, which is still ongoing,
617
00:40:48.889 --> 00:40:52.130
and because they're still investigating the charges against their client,
618
00:40:52.489 --> 00:40:56.570
deciding now would be at a minimum premature as wading
619
00:40:56.610 --> 00:41:00.690
through the extensive information that makes up the case is incomplete.
620
00:41:01.289 --> 00:41:03.949
Sounds like a bunch of hogwash to me. What's his alibi?
621
00:41:03.989 --> 00:41:06.239
Where was he? and who had eyes on him at
622
00:41:06.280 --> 00:41:09.179
the time when these murders occurred. You would think that
623
00:41:09.219 --> 00:41:12.239
you'd have your alibi all wrapped up nice and tight
624
00:41:12.360 --> 00:41:14.610
with a little bow on it, but that doesn't seem
625
00:41:14.639 --> 00:41:16.969
to be what's going on with Kohlberger here, and he
626
00:41:16.989 --> 00:41:20.469
can't even offer up an alibi. So, how is it
627
00:41:20.530 --> 00:41:23.510
that he's going to get himself off these charges when
628
00:41:23.530 --> 00:41:26.909
something basic as far as an alibi hasn't even been
629
00:41:26.969 --> 00:41:30.539
provided as of yet? There's a question for all of
630
00:41:30.579 --> 00:41:35.329
you contrarians out there who think Brian Kohlberger is innocent. Additionally,
631
00:41:35.510 --> 00:41:39.909
deciding at this juncture may tread into disclosures of protected information,
632
00:41:39.949 --> 00:41:42.510
they said. Oh, it may, huh? You would think that
633
00:41:42.550 --> 00:41:44.869
if you had an alibi, you'd be screaming about it
634
00:41:45.090 --> 00:41:47.570
from the rooftop. I know that if I was accused
635
00:41:47.610 --> 00:41:50.150
of crimes such as these, I'd be yelling and screaming
636
00:41:50.329 --> 00:41:53.550
for everybody to hear me. My alibi is this. Go
637
00:41:53.679 --> 00:41:56.639
ask Johnny. We were down at the local pub doing
638
00:41:56.679 --> 00:42:00.639
shots of Jägermeister. But no, we haven't heard anything like that,
639
00:42:00.679 --> 00:42:04.500
have we? Instead, it's about the process. It's about the technicalities.
640
00:42:04.980 --> 00:42:07.780
And that's how it always will be for people who
641
00:42:07.820 --> 00:42:11.010
are not innocent. Now, it's one thing when you're innocent
642
00:42:11.489 --> 00:42:14.650
and you're attacking the process as well as providing some
643
00:42:14.730 --> 00:42:18.150
evidence for why you're innocent. But when people are only
644
00:42:18.210 --> 00:42:21.440
attacking the process... One thing that I have certainly learned
645
00:42:21.820 --> 00:42:24.380
over the past few years that we've been following this stuff,
646
00:42:24.800 --> 00:42:27.110
when it's a complete attack of the process looking for
647
00:42:27.139 --> 00:42:31.690
loopholes and technicalities, it usually means that the person doing
648
00:42:31.730 --> 00:42:35.389
that is guilty and that their legal team has no
649
00:42:35.489 --> 00:42:38.489
other way to go after the case and try and
650
00:42:38.530 --> 00:42:41.849
destroy the foundation that it's built upon. And this defense
651
00:42:41.869 --> 00:42:45.769
strategy thus far is oozing with all sorts of signs
652
00:42:46.190 --> 00:42:49.940
of exactly that. Kohlberger's defense says It needs time to
653
00:42:49.980 --> 00:42:54.920
make this determination and consider evidentiary rules. Now, I don't
654
00:42:54.960 --> 00:42:57.380
disagree with that. There's a lot of discovery to get
655
00:42:57.420 --> 00:42:59.760
through here. And that's why I said from the beginning,
656
00:43:00.199 --> 00:43:02.280
I don't think this trial kicks off when they say
657
00:43:02.320 --> 00:43:05.539
it's going to in October. I think we're looking at
658
00:43:05.940 --> 00:43:09.300
a summer of 2024 type of start date for this.
659
00:43:09.960 --> 00:43:13.400
And the reason being is that the discovery is massive.
660
00:43:13.860 --> 00:43:16.980
We're talking three trilobites so far of information that they've
661
00:43:17.000 --> 00:43:21.429
handed over, meaning the prosecution. So the defense, obviously, they
662
00:43:21.469 --> 00:43:23.190
have to go through all of that with a fine
663
00:43:23.210 --> 00:43:27.010
tooth comb. And it's going to take time. So I
664
00:43:27.030 --> 00:43:30.280
highly doubt this trial kicks off in October, like they said.
665
00:43:30.719 --> 00:43:32.960
And you're getting a bunch of little tells about that
666
00:43:33.579 --> 00:43:35.760
along the way. And this is certainly one of them.
667
00:43:36.059 --> 00:43:38.659
When they start complaining or bringing up the fact that
668
00:43:38.940 --> 00:43:41.480
there's a lot of evidence to go through, that's usually
669
00:43:41.559 --> 00:43:44.460
a sign that they're going to ask for the trial
670
00:43:44.500 --> 00:43:48.429
to be delayed a little bit. The Latah County Prosecutor's
671
00:43:48.510 --> 00:43:51.590
Office leading the case against Kohlberger put in their demand
672
00:43:51.630 --> 00:43:54.849
for his notice of alibi a day after his May
673
00:43:55.170 --> 00:43:59.489
22nd arraignment. According to Idaho law, defendants are supposed to
674
00:43:59.530 --> 00:44:03.050
respond to that demand within 10 days or at such
675
00:44:03.110 --> 00:44:06.179
different time as the court may direct with a written
676
00:44:06.219 --> 00:44:09.039
statement of where they claim to have been at the
677
00:44:09.059 --> 00:44:12.300
time of the alleged crime, along with the identities of
678
00:44:12.340 --> 00:44:15.800
the witnesses on whom they plan to rely on for
679
00:44:15.840 --> 00:44:19.039
that alibi. Now, I'm sure that there's some legal mind
680
00:44:19.099 --> 00:44:22.780
out there that understands this way better than me. But
681
00:44:22.820 --> 00:44:25.110
it seems like if you have an alibi, that's one
682
00:44:25.130 --> 00:44:27.570
of the first things you want to talk about. Hey,
683
00:44:27.610 --> 00:44:30.730
go talk to so-and-so. We were hanging out. I didn't
684
00:44:30.769 --> 00:44:32.610
do this. Why am I even in jail right now?
685
00:44:33.050 --> 00:44:35.889
And if Brian Kohlberger was hanging out with people around
686
00:44:35.929 --> 00:44:39.329
this time when these murders occurred, do you really think
687
00:44:39.349 --> 00:44:41.300
he'd still be sitting in jail right now? Or do
688
00:44:41.320 --> 00:44:43.360
you think that Ann Taylor would be making a big
689
00:44:43.400 --> 00:44:45.840
deal about it? Of course, she'd be making a big
690
00:44:45.880 --> 00:44:48.420
deal about it to get him bailed out. And I'm
691
00:44:48.460 --> 00:44:50.159
sure the judge would look at that and say, hey,
692
00:44:50.179 --> 00:44:51.800
you know what? This guy has an alibi. What are
693
00:44:51.820 --> 00:44:54.659
you guys talking about here? But none of that's occurred.
694
00:44:55.139 --> 00:44:57.969
All we have seen is the massive pile of evidence
695
00:44:58.409 --> 00:45:01.590
that is being built against Brian Kohlberger. And it all
696
00:45:01.630 --> 00:45:04.889
looks damning. Each piece of evidence that we receive, as
697
00:45:04.929 --> 00:45:07.860
the public even, is more damning than the last one.
698
00:45:08.460 --> 00:45:10.800
The defense is asking the court for more time to
699
00:45:10.840 --> 00:45:14.329
decide or to make an exception to that rule. They
700
00:45:14.429 --> 00:45:16.730
ask that if the court is not inclined to grant
701
00:45:16.750 --> 00:45:20.949
their request, a hearing be set to present oral argument, evidence,
702
00:45:21.219 --> 00:45:25.059
and or testimony in support of their motion. No ruling
703
00:45:25.460 --> 00:45:28.059
has yet been issued. And I have my eye on
704
00:45:28.079 --> 00:45:31.659
those court documents, obviously, every single day. And when we
705
00:45:31.679 --> 00:45:34.559
get a ruling, we'll have it updated. I plan on
706
00:45:34.659 --> 00:45:37.579
adding some more documents to the catalog over the week.
707
00:45:38.000 --> 00:45:40.539
That way, we're not behind and we're all up to
708
00:45:40.579 --> 00:45:45.000
date on what's going on behind the scenes. Neither Kohlberger's
709
00:45:45.059 --> 00:45:49.340
attorneys nor prosecutors immediately responded to requests for comment for
710
00:45:49.380 --> 00:45:52.469
this story from ABC News, and they're not going to
711
00:45:52.510 --> 00:45:55.650
comment because of the gag order. The judge in the
712
00:45:55.670 --> 00:45:59.630
case has issued an order largely barring both parties from
713
00:45:59.710 --> 00:46:04.769
speaking publicly about the investigation or pending prosecution outside of court.
714
00:46:05.369 --> 00:46:09.269
And just quickly, talking about judges, there wasn't a sudden
715
00:46:09.329 --> 00:46:13.119
shift in judges in this case. What happened was, The
716
00:46:13.159 --> 00:46:16.380
case originally hit Megan Marshall's office because she is a
717
00:46:16.420 --> 00:46:20.079
lower court. But now that it's progressed and he's been arraigned,
718
00:46:20.340 --> 00:46:22.590
it moves on to the next level of the court system.
719
00:46:22.929 --> 00:46:26.010
And that means it ends up in Judge John Judge's
720
00:46:26.070 --> 00:46:28.949
courtroom and not Judge Marshall's. And I know there was
721
00:46:28.969 --> 00:46:32.269
some confusion there about that issue. So that's what happened.
722
00:46:32.329 --> 00:46:35.780
It's nothing, you know, sinister or anything like that. That's
723
00:46:35.800 --> 00:46:38.119
just how the court system works. You get arraigned in
724
00:46:38.219 --> 00:46:40.699
one court and then you move on to the next level.
725
00:46:41.210 --> 00:46:44.590
and Idaho has a tiered court system that functions in
726
00:46:44.630 --> 00:46:49.329
that manner. Koberger, 28, was indicted last month in charge
727
00:46:49.389 --> 00:46:52.789
with four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary.
728
00:46:53.409 --> 00:46:56.179
At his arraignment in late May, Koberger declined to offer
729
00:46:56.219 --> 00:46:59.239
a plea, so the judge entered a not guilty plea
730
00:46:59.639 --> 00:47:03.260
on his behalf. A trial date has been set for
731
00:47:03.440 --> 00:47:08.039
October 2nd. Prosecutors allege that in the early morning hours
732
00:47:08.099 --> 00:47:13.800
of November 13, 2022, Kohlberger, a criminology Ph.D. student at
733
00:47:13.840 --> 00:47:18.119
Washington State University, broke into an off-campus home and stabbed
734
00:47:18.139 --> 00:47:23.130
to death four University of Idaho students, Ethan Chapin, Madison Mogan,
735
00:47:23.510 --> 00:47:28.989
Zanna Kernodle, and Kaylee Gonsalves. After a more than six-week hunt,
736
00:47:29.309 --> 00:47:33.349
police zeroed in on Kohlberger as a suspect, tracking his
737
00:47:33.389 --> 00:47:37.570
white Hyundai Elantra, cell phone, signal data, And recovering, what
738
00:47:37.610 --> 00:47:41.329
authorities say, was his DNA on a knife sheath found
739
00:47:41.630 --> 00:47:45.150
next to one of the victim's bodies, according to court documents.
740
00:47:45.730 --> 00:47:48.329
And that's the glue that binds it all together. That
741
00:47:48.369 --> 00:47:52.250
DNA on that knife sheath ties all that other evidence
742
00:47:52.469 --> 00:47:54.829
up in a nice little bow. And if you look
743
00:47:54.869 --> 00:47:58.360
at this evidence piecemeal, yeah, it doesn't look like it's
744
00:47:58.550 --> 00:48:00.780
a slam dunk. But when you look at all of
745
00:48:00.820 --> 00:48:04.579
the evidence combined, it makes all of that evidence that
746
00:48:04.639 --> 00:48:08.739
much stronger. And Brian Kohlberger and his team, they're going
747
00:48:08.760 --> 00:48:11.460
to have a big problem contending with all of that
748
00:48:11.539 --> 00:48:15.219
evidence balled into one. T-Mobile 5 was arrested on December
749
00:48:15.280 --> 00:48:19.239
30th in Pennsylvania after driving cross-country to spend the holidays
750
00:48:19.320 --> 00:48:23.300
at his family home in Albrightville, Pennsylvania. Since the time
751
00:48:23.340 --> 00:48:28.550
of Kohlberger's arrest, the prosecution has disclosed roughly 51 terabytes
752
00:48:28.570 --> 00:48:32.460
of information. as part of the discovery process, including thousands
753
00:48:32.500 --> 00:48:36.280
of pages of discovery, thousands of photographs, hundreds of hours
754
00:48:36.320 --> 00:48:41.239
of recordings, further, many gigabytes of electronic phone record and
755
00:48:41.320 --> 00:48:45.360
social media data, according to court documents. So they dropped
756
00:48:45.429 --> 00:48:48.429
a whole ass ton of information in the laps of
757
00:48:48.489 --> 00:48:50.949
the defense. Now, they have to have time to go
758
00:48:50.989 --> 00:48:53.369
through all of that. So like I said earlier in
759
00:48:53.409 --> 00:48:56.929
this episode, I don't see the trial, unfortunately, kicking off
760
00:48:57.550 --> 00:49:00.929
at the start date of October 2nd, like they're hoping.
761
00:49:01.559 --> 00:49:04.760
And that all is based on the gigantic amount of
762
00:49:04.860 --> 00:49:08.659
evidence that has to be gone through here. Mr. Kohlberger's
763
00:49:08.699 --> 00:49:13.199
investigation and preparation of his defense is underway. His defense
764
00:49:13.239 --> 00:49:15.949
said in a response to the state's alibi demand and
765
00:49:16.010 --> 00:49:19.969
request for a discovery disclosure filed on Friday, adding that
766
00:49:20.389 --> 00:49:24.190
as determinations are made regarding trial evidence, the same will
767
00:49:24.210 --> 00:49:29.070
be timely disclosed. Trial witnesses will be disclosed as determinations
768
00:49:29.139 --> 00:49:32.880
are made. The defense wrote, Mr. Kohlberger does intend to
769
00:49:32.920 --> 00:49:37.099
call individuals named in the state's supply discovery materials. So
770
00:49:37.260 --> 00:49:39.429
what that means is He doesn't plan on calling his
771
00:49:39.489 --> 00:49:42.940
own witnesses. He plans on calling witnesses that are being
772
00:49:42.980 --> 00:49:46.219
brought up by the prosecution. That way his defense can
773
00:49:46.260 --> 00:49:48.219
hammer them. But I think they're going to need to
774
00:49:48.260 --> 00:49:51.400
bring a little more to the party than just that.
775
00:49:51.820 --> 00:49:54.929
Because when all is said and done, just the evidence
776
00:49:54.949 --> 00:49:57.690
that we see here is a mountain high. And can
777
00:49:57.730 --> 00:50:01.590
you imagine what they have behind the scenes? Imagine GPS coordinates.
778
00:50:01.949 --> 00:50:04.789
him connecting to a Wi-Fi router, and all of the
779
00:50:04.849 --> 00:50:07.989
other evidence that has been collected in the aftermath of
780
00:50:08.030 --> 00:50:12.909
these murders, the task before Brian Kohlberger's lawyers is massive.
781
00:50:13.250 --> 00:50:16.050
The question is, are they up for the challenge? And
782
00:50:16.110 --> 00:50:20.309
what strategy do they plan on using? All right, folks,
783
00:50:20.329 --> 00:50:21.929
that's going to do it for this one. All of
784
00:50:21.969 --> 00:50:24.809
the information that goes with the episode can be found
785
00:50:25.159 --> 00:50:26.090
in the description box.
1
00:00:00.230 --> 00:00:04.540
What's up everyone and welcome back to the program. Brian
2
00:00:04.559 --> 00:00:08.820
Kohlberger and his defense team have thrown everything they possibly
3
00:00:08.859 --> 00:00:12.259
can imagine at the prosecution in hopes of trying to
4
00:00:12.279 --> 00:00:15.300
get the death penalty thrown out, only to find Judge
5
00:00:15.339 --> 00:00:18.589
Hippler standing in their way every single time they bring
6
00:00:18.620 --> 00:00:21.949
a new motion. And unfortunately for Brian Kohlberger, that has
7
00:00:21.989 --> 00:00:24.670
not changed recently with the new orders that have hit
8
00:00:24.710 --> 00:00:28.070
the docket denying Brian Koberger and his team and their
9
00:00:28.089 --> 00:00:32.030
emotions to get this death penalty tossed. So today we're
10
00:00:32.049 --> 00:00:33.950
going to talk about that a little bit more. And
11
00:00:33.990 --> 00:00:37.439
to do that, we have an article from Fox News. Headline,
12
00:00:37.679 --> 00:00:41.359
Idaho judge slams Brian Koberger's hollow attempt to dodge death
13
00:00:41.380 --> 00:00:44.520
penalty and latest blow to the defense. This article was
14
00:00:44.600 --> 00:00:48.409
authored by Adam Sabes. A judge in Idaho denied a
15
00:00:48.450 --> 00:00:51.670
motion from Brian Koberger's defense team asking to remove the
16
00:00:51.710 --> 00:00:54.990
death penalty as a potential punishment if he's found guilty.
17
00:00:56.020 --> 00:00:58.929
Kohlberger is charged with first-degree murder in the deaths of
18
00:00:58.950 --> 00:01:02.689
four students in the University of Idaho, including Kaylee Gonsalves,
19
00:01:02.869 --> 00:01:07.430
Zanna Kernodle, Madison Mogan, and Ethan Chapin. The former student
20
00:01:07.469 --> 00:01:10.390
at the University of Washington was also charged with one
21
00:01:10.450 --> 00:01:14.510
felony count of burglary. During a hearing on April 9th,
22
00:01:14.569 --> 00:01:18.170
Kohlberger's defense team presented the motion to strike the death penalty,
23
00:01:18.650 --> 00:01:23.109
arguing that discovery produced by prosecutors has both been voluminous
24
00:01:23.420 --> 00:01:27.560
and unorganized. Kohlberger argued this meant he was unable to
25
00:01:27.599 --> 00:01:31.189
meaningfully review and investigate the evidence in preparation for trial,
26
00:01:31.530 --> 00:01:34.849
which is currently scheduled to begin in August. I mean,
27
00:01:34.870 --> 00:01:38.689
we're going on what, three, four years now? Stop with
28
00:01:38.709 --> 00:01:42.230
the whole I'm not prepared. Now look, everybody deserves a
29
00:01:42.269 --> 00:01:45.969
chance to defend themselves, even people that we might find condemnable.
30
00:01:47.189 --> 00:01:49.950
But at some point, the party has to get started.
31
00:01:51.439 --> 00:01:53.599
And my advice is, if you don't want to deal
32
00:01:53.659 --> 00:01:57.780
with a massive discovery, don't murder four people in their beds.
33
00:01:58.219 --> 00:02:00.459
Because if you do, well, you can expect that the
34
00:02:00.500 --> 00:02:03.079
process is not going to be favorable to you and
35
00:02:03.120 --> 00:02:05.840
that you're going to have to, at some point, stand
36
00:02:05.859 --> 00:02:09.979
before the wagon and take responsibility for what you allegedly did.
37
00:02:11.159 --> 00:02:13.099
I mean, if you flip the script and look at Diddy,
38
00:02:13.419 --> 00:02:16.080
look at how quickly his trial has come, as opposed
39
00:02:16.099 --> 00:02:18.919
to Brian Kohlberger's. Now, of course, two different things. We're
40
00:02:18.939 --> 00:02:22.219
talking about capital punishment here. and Diddy obviously were not.
41
00:02:22.960 --> 00:02:26.099
But still, Kohlberger's team has done nothing but gum up
42
00:02:26.139 --> 00:02:28.930
the works the whole entire time, and frankly, the state
43
00:02:28.939 --> 00:02:31.009
of Idaho has been more than fair when it comes
44
00:02:31.050 --> 00:02:35.189
to Brian Kohlberger. Judge Stephen Hippler wrote in his order
45
00:02:35.270 --> 00:02:38.370
on Tuesday that Kohlberger complaints about the amount of discovery
46
00:02:38.409 --> 00:02:42.710
produced ring hollow. Kohlberger has been receiving discovery in the
47
00:02:42.750 --> 00:02:46.110
same manner for over two years, Hippler wrote. Kohlberger has
48
00:02:46.169 --> 00:02:50.009
not sought additional resources to hire additional staff to review discovery,
49
00:02:50.439 --> 00:02:54.150
or obtain litigation document control software to help organize and
50
00:02:54.189 --> 00:02:57.879
sort the evidence. His lead counsel insisted that she will
51
00:02:57.930 --> 00:03:00.849
be allowed to take on a second high-profile capital case,
52
00:03:01.250 --> 00:03:05.009
despite the voluminous discovery in this case. So yeah, that's
53
00:03:05.050 --> 00:03:07.969
not good. You're going to say that you can't get
54
00:03:08.009 --> 00:03:10.110
things ready, but at the same time you're taking on
55
00:03:10.169 --> 00:03:13.930
another capital case? Sorry, but the judge isn't going to
56
00:03:13.969 --> 00:03:17.460
just acquiesce to your demands. This isn't about what's best
57
00:03:17.500 --> 00:03:19.659
for you. It's about what's best for the state of
58
00:03:19.759 --> 00:03:23.879
Idaho and the victims and their families. Hipler also wrote
59
00:03:23.939 --> 00:03:27.400
that Koberger's lawyer, Ann Taylor, indicated that her practice is
60
00:03:27.460 --> 00:03:31.400
to personally review all the discovery herself rather than rely
61
00:03:31.500 --> 00:03:34.659
on associates and staff to review materials to cut through
62
00:03:34.699 --> 00:03:38.180
the less relevant information and point to what materials need
63
00:03:38.219 --> 00:03:41.460
review by lead counsel. I don't have beef with that, honestly.
64
00:03:41.479 --> 00:03:45.030
I want my lawyer looking at everything. I don't want
65
00:03:45.060 --> 00:03:47.110
some hired intern to do it I don't want a
66
00:03:47.129 --> 00:03:49.699
paralegal to do it. I want my lawyer to do it.
67
00:03:50.009 --> 00:03:52.439
So I get that for sure. But at some point,
68
00:03:53.020 --> 00:03:55.479
there's only so much you can do. And when you're
69
00:03:55.520 --> 00:03:59.020
talking about a massive case like this, the time is now.
70
00:04:00.199 --> 00:04:03.439
These actions are not indicative of an overburdened defense team,
71
00:04:03.479 --> 00:04:06.909
Hitler wrote of the motion. Addressing one of the arguments
72
00:04:06.939 --> 00:04:12.110
from Kohlberger's team, the prosecutors larded its production with entirely
73
00:04:12.210 --> 00:04:15.590
irrelevant documents, Hitler said. There's no proof of that occurring.
74
00:04:16.670 --> 00:04:19.269
And of course, Brian Kohlberger fans are going to say, oh, well,
75
00:04:19.310 --> 00:04:22.850
the judge is against him. The judge isn't Brian Kohlberger's friend.
76
00:04:22.889 --> 00:04:25.069
He's looking to convict him. No, the judge is just
77
00:04:25.089 --> 00:04:31.560
doing his job. That's all. Pretty simple. Timeline of November 13th, 2022.
78
00:04:31.560 --> 00:04:35.899
4 a.m., suspect arrives at the house. Between 4 and 4.17,
79
00:04:35.899 --> 00:04:40.860
time of murders. 4.19, roommate calls. Three victims. No one answers. 4.22
80
00:04:40.860 --> 00:04:47.360
to 4.24, surviving roommate text each other. From inside the house. 427.
81
00:04:47.360 --> 00:04:53.180
Roommate calls victims again. No one answers. 432. Roommate texts Gonsalves,
82
00:04:53.220 --> 00:04:58.459
please answer. 1023. Surviving roommate texts victims. No one answers. 1139.
83
00:04:58.459 --> 00:05:03.399
Roommate calls her father. 12pm. 911 call placed from roommate's phone.
84
00:05:03.899 --> 00:05:06.730
Hippler's decision comes less than a week after he denied
85
00:05:06.750 --> 00:05:10.269
a different motion to remove the death penalty. Koberger's defense
86
00:05:10.310 --> 00:05:15.000
team previously argued... that the defendant's autism diagnosis should preclude
87
00:05:15.060 --> 00:05:17.660
him from the death penalty. And we all know how
88
00:05:17.699 --> 00:05:21.740
that worked out. Imagine trying to say your autism should
89
00:05:21.779 --> 00:05:24.459
preclude you from the death penalty. Now look, if Brian
90
00:05:24.480 --> 00:05:27.819
Kohlberger was somebody who, you know, was non-functioning or something
91
00:05:27.839 --> 00:05:30.970
like that, be a different story. This dude has a,
92
00:05:31.230 --> 00:05:35.129
you know, college degree, PhD candidate. So if he's capable
93
00:05:35.170 --> 00:05:37.310
of doing all of that, then don't tell me that
94
00:05:37.350 --> 00:05:40.939
the autism played a part in these alleged crimes. because
95
00:05:40.959 --> 00:05:44.220
I'm not buying that for a second. Alright, moving on
96
00:05:44.240 --> 00:05:48.079
to our second article of the day, this one from KXLY.com,
97
00:05:48.689 --> 00:05:51.850
and the headline, Prosecutors Want to Do Their Own Evaluation
98
00:05:51.870 --> 00:05:55.529
of Brian Koberger's Mental Health. This article was authored by
99
00:05:55.569 --> 00:06:00.709
Melissa Luck. Prosecutors who are putting Brian Koberger on trial
100
00:06:00.769 --> 00:06:04.170
for the murder of four University of Idaho students want
101
00:06:04.189 --> 00:06:07.079
to evaluate his mental health, but want to keep secret
102
00:06:07.120 --> 00:06:11.389
the tests and other information for Koberger's privacy. That's the
103
00:06:11.430 --> 00:06:13.870
right way to do it. Look, as the public, we're
104
00:06:13.910 --> 00:06:16.509
not all privy to that. And some things have to
105
00:06:16.550 --> 00:06:19.459
be kept, you know, in confidence. But I think it's
106
00:06:19.480 --> 00:06:21.439
a good idea for the state to have their own
107
00:06:21.519 --> 00:06:24.500
experts take a look at Kohlberger and see if everybody
108
00:06:24.519 --> 00:06:27.079
can get on the same page. And that might be
109
00:06:27.120 --> 00:06:30.649
helpful even, right? What if the state finds something that
110
00:06:30.730 --> 00:06:33.610
his experts missed? So I think it's a pretty good
111
00:06:33.709 --> 00:06:36.310
idea to have the state get a look at Brian
112
00:06:36.329 --> 00:06:39.250
Kohlberger as far as an evaluation of his mental state.
113
00:06:40.800 --> 00:06:44.160
Kohlberger faces the death penalty if convicted of killing Madison Mogan,
114
00:06:44.199 --> 00:06:49.220
Kaylee Gonsalves, Ethan Chapin, and Zanna Kernodel. The defense team
115
00:06:49.279 --> 00:06:53.100
says Kohlberger has recently been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder,
116
00:06:53.420 --> 00:06:56.420
but a judge ruled that diagnosis is not enough to
117
00:06:56.459 --> 00:07:00.399
remove the death penalty as a possible punishment. Prosecutors asked
118
00:07:00.439 --> 00:07:04.029
the judge to seal their motion to examine Kohlberger. And again,
119
00:07:04.050 --> 00:07:05.829
there's going to be people that aren't cool with that.
120
00:07:06.230 --> 00:07:08.589
They're going to want to see everything, and I understand
121
00:07:08.629 --> 00:07:12.399
that too. Look, I'm all for transparency, but I'm also
122
00:07:12.480 --> 00:07:15.399
for everybody getting a fair shake, even people that I
123
00:07:15.439 --> 00:07:18.100
might think or might be leaning towards them being guilty.
124
00:07:18.980 --> 00:07:21.800
And that certainly includes Brian Koberger. I've said it a
125
00:07:21.810 --> 00:07:24.589
million times. I have no axe to grind with this dude.
126
00:07:26.029 --> 00:07:28.829
And the prosecution better have their shit together, and they
127
00:07:28.850 --> 00:07:31.110
better be on point if they're going to try and
128
00:07:31.129 --> 00:07:35.209
put somebody to death. And so far, as far as
129
00:07:35.290 --> 00:07:38.959
I can tell, they most certainly have been. So this
130
00:07:39.040 --> 00:07:42.139
isn't one of those cases like we see over in
131
00:07:42.240 --> 00:07:46.439
Indiana with Richard Allen. Not in the least. And all
132
00:07:46.459 --> 00:07:49.389
these content creators out here that are pitching that shit,
133
00:07:49.750 --> 00:07:53.050
they're just trying to drive engagement. And frankly, my guess
134
00:07:53.129 --> 00:07:56.009
is the vast majority of these people pumping bullshit don't
135
00:07:56.050 --> 00:07:58.529
even believe it. They just know that there's an audience
136
00:07:58.569 --> 00:08:01.089
for it and they know that their sponsor for the
137
00:08:01.230 --> 00:08:04.439
ED pills or whatever the fuck they're pitching is going
138
00:08:04.459 --> 00:08:06.660
to give them some money if they get engagement. So
139
00:08:06.699 --> 00:08:09.560
they'll say whatever. But the facts don't bear out any
140
00:08:09.579 --> 00:08:11.870
of the bullshit. And that's why we go through these
141
00:08:11.899 --> 00:08:14.529
court documents. That way all of you get it right
142
00:08:14.550 --> 00:08:16.790
from the source. You don't need a third party to
143
00:08:16.829 --> 00:08:20.470
tell you. The court documents have all the information we need.
144
00:08:23.250 --> 00:08:27.180
Prosecutors wrote that the filing reveals mental health information about
145
00:08:27.240 --> 00:08:33.139
Koberger including psychological, psychiatric, and neurological information and diagnoses of
146
00:08:33.179 --> 00:08:36.980
the defendant. The filing also reveals the nature of mental
147
00:08:37.000 --> 00:08:40.659
conditions already conducted and the type of examinations and testing
148
00:08:40.679 --> 00:08:44.460
the state seeks to perform. Prosecutors wrote, some of which
149
00:08:44.600 --> 00:08:48.519
is personality testing to which the defendant objects. Yeah, I
150
00:08:48.539 --> 00:08:50.519
don't think he really is in a position to object.
151
00:08:51.039 --> 00:08:53.919
And I think that moving forward with the trial, the
152
00:08:53.960 --> 00:08:56.799
judge can obviously demand that he does it. He can
153
00:08:56.919 --> 00:09:01.370
order that Brian Kohlberger engages in this testing. And considering
154
00:09:01.409 --> 00:09:03.889
what we've seen from Hipler throughout this whole thing, I
155
00:09:03.929 --> 00:09:06.750
wouldn't be shocked to see him order this. I think
156
00:09:06.769 --> 00:09:10.639
it's a good idea. I think that Brian Kohlberger would
157
00:09:10.659 --> 00:09:14.580
be helped here, right? Because it gives him another professional
158
00:09:14.620 --> 00:09:17.379
to take a look at what's going on mentally. And
159
00:09:17.419 --> 00:09:19.960
maybe later on down the road, if something's found and
160
00:09:20.000 --> 00:09:23.019
he's convicted, he can use that as part of his appeal.
161
00:09:24.120 --> 00:09:27.080
So I think that Brian Kohlberger would be better served
162
00:09:27.480 --> 00:09:31.659
if he went under this other examination and got another opinion,
163
00:09:31.700 --> 00:09:33.789
a second opinion or third opinion, whatever it might be.
164
00:09:35.730 --> 00:09:40.210
The filing indicates the prosecution would use information gleaned from
165
00:09:40.250 --> 00:09:43.129
the exam in the death penalty phase, which is conducted
166
00:09:43.490 --> 00:09:47.559
if Kohlberger is convicted. Prosecutors in defense are due back
167
00:09:47.620 --> 00:09:50.659
in court in Boise in mid-May. The trial is scheduled
168
00:09:50.679 --> 00:09:53.679
to begin in August. So there's still a lot going
169
00:09:53.779 --> 00:09:56.129
on here. And we still don't have anywhere near enough
170
00:09:56.190 --> 00:09:58.889
information to know which way the wind is really blowing.
171
00:09:59.600 --> 00:10:02.620
but we're starting to get there and the more court
172
00:10:02.659 --> 00:10:05.059
documents that hit the docket the better serve we're going
173
00:10:05.080 --> 00:10:07.940
to be moving forward and obviously we still have a
174
00:10:07.980 --> 00:10:10.360
few months here before we get to the trial but
175
00:10:10.440 --> 00:10:13.289
things are in motion and there's a lot of decisions
176
00:10:13.330 --> 00:10:15.350
that are being made now that are going to loom
177
00:10:15.389 --> 00:10:19.230
large later on when this trial starts So like usual,
178
00:10:19.450 --> 00:10:21.950
we'll continue to follow along with all the twists and
179
00:10:21.990 --> 00:10:24.809
turns as we continue to follow along with the state
180
00:10:24.830 --> 00:10:28.789
of Idaho and the capital murder case brought against Brian Kohlberger.
181
00:10:29.750 --> 00:10:32.049
All of the information that goes with this episode can
182
00:10:32.090 --> 00:10:34.990
be found in the description box. What's up everyone and
183
00:10:35.049 --> 00:10:39.029
welcome back to the program. In this episode, we have
184
00:10:39.090 --> 00:10:42.250
a relatively short article to get to, one that's talking
185
00:10:42.309 --> 00:10:45.620
about the DNA and how the DNA could have led
186
00:10:45.629 --> 00:10:49.110
to Brian Kohlberger. However, this is a man with no
187
00:10:49.149 --> 00:10:52.269
criminal history, a man that was not in CODIS. So
188
00:10:52.909 --> 00:10:56.799
how did the DNA lead the police to him? Obviously,
189
00:10:56.840 --> 00:11:00.059
a lot goes into that. They have their investigation that
190
00:11:00.139 --> 00:11:02.039
tips them off that this might be the man they're
191
00:11:02.059 --> 00:11:06.330
looking for. And then from there, everything moves. They'll have
192
00:11:06.389 --> 00:11:09.269
a surveillance team put on them. They'll start following them
193
00:11:09.610 --> 00:11:11.490
and they'll try and collect his DNA one way or
194
00:11:11.509 --> 00:11:14.289
the other to get a match, especially if it doesn't
195
00:11:14.330 --> 00:11:18.820
hit inside of CODIS. And if you have no criminal history, obviously,
196
00:11:19.120 --> 00:11:22.659
you're not going to pop inside of that database. And
197
00:11:22.679 --> 00:11:26.139
Brian Koberger not having a criminal history certainly worked to
198
00:11:26.159 --> 00:11:32.009
his advantage, at least in the beginning. But eventually, the
199
00:11:32.029 --> 00:11:36.210
jig was up and Brian Koberger is now sitting behind
200
00:11:36.269 --> 00:11:41.620
bars and waiting to be extradited to Idaho. So let's
201
00:11:41.659 --> 00:11:44.389
get into this quick article here. And let's talk about
202
00:11:44.429 --> 00:11:48.669
the DNA a little bit more with retired FBI agent
203
00:11:49.190 --> 00:11:57.929
John McVeigh. This article was published on WPBF.com. Headline, Idaho
204
00:11:57.970 --> 00:12:01.960
murder suspect Brian Koberger has no criminal history and no
205
00:12:02.000 --> 00:12:06.320
car registered in his own name. Retired FBI agent says
206
00:12:06.379 --> 00:12:11.059
Koberger would not have been in the National DNA fingerprint database.
207
00:12:12.779 --> 00:12:17.250
This article was authored by Terry Parker. Definitely was critical.
208
00:12:17.299 --> 00:12:35.639
Not may have been. Definitely was critical. especially if he
209
00:12:35.659 --> 00:12:38.539
was found in possession of that vehicle, right? Very critical
210
00:12:38.580 --> 00:12:40.639
that he has the vehicle that was seen on the
211
00:12:40.659 --> 00:12:44.889
tape and obviously circumstantial until they can hammer the point home.
212
00:12:45.269 --> 00:12:48.350
But it gives them at least the basis for this
213
00:12:48.409 --> 00:12:52.220
investigation and probable cause. Remember, that's important. You have to
214
00:12:52.250 --> 00:12:57.009
have probable cause before you can make an arrest. Friday,
215
00:12:57.120 --> 00:13:00.559
Moscow police chief James Fry confirmed a white Hyundai Elantra
216
00:13:00.600 --> 00:13:03.639
was seized in Pennsylvania, where the FBI and state police
217
00:13:03.659 --> 00:13:08.019
SWAT teams arrested Koberger early Friday morning. And they came
218
00:13:08.059 --> 00:13:10.350
in at like 3 a.m. And that's how they do it.
219
00:13:10.559 --> 00:13:12.200
If they're going to raid your house, you better believe
220
00:13:12.220 --> 00:13:14.240
they're going to try and come in while you're sleeping.
221
00:13:15.950 --> 00:13:20.049
Retired Special Agent John McVeigh told investigative reporter Terry Parker
222
00:13:20.389 --> 00:13:23.269
that Koberger does not have a vehicle registered in his
223
00:13:23.309 --> 00:13:26.710
name and no criminal history, meaning while police were running
224
00:13:26.789 --> 00:13:29.610
DNA and fingerprint checks from the crime scene on the
225
00:13:29.649 --> 00:13:33.929
national database, Koberger would not have shown up as a match.
226
00:13:34.509 --> 00:13:36.570
And this is certainly how it goes. If you don't
227
00:13:36.590 --> 00:13:39.090
have a criminal history and you don't have a profile
228
00:13:39.129 --> 00:13:41.769
that's already been built in the system, well, there's no
229
00:13:41.789 --> 00:13:44.009
way for them to match that. So what they do
230
00:13:44.090 --> 00:13:46.070
is they hold on to that DNA that they collect.
231
00:13:46.470 --> 00:13:49.029
And then if they get a suspect, obviously try and
232
00:13:49.080 --> 00:13:51.179
match that DNA that was found at the crime scene
233
00:13:51.460 --> 00:13:54.940
to the suspect themselves. In this case, that's what they did.
234
00:13:57.029 --> 00:14:00.080
They would have found no criminal history, nothing in the database.
235
00:14:00.679 --> 00:14:03.440
And so if they linked him by some other means,
236
00:14:03.820 --> 00:14:06.279
then they would have probably set up surveillance on him,
237
00:14:06.559 --> 00:14:09.360
said McVeigh. And my guess is that they did. Once
238
00:14:09.379 --> 00:14:11.490
they had an idea of who he was and who
239
00:14:11.509 --> 00:14:14.289
they were looking for and had an idea where he
240
00:14:14.330 --> 00:14:18.789
was at, the surveillance would come very quickly. And usually
241
00:14:18.830 --> 00:14:21.860
it's the FBI that's doing something like that in this instance.
242
00:14:22.980 --> 00:14:24.940
And when we say surveillance, we're talking about the same
243
00:14:24.980 --> 00:14:28.799
guys who are working against terrorists and the mafia. And
244
00:14:28.840 --> 00:14:31.639
these guys and gals are the best at what they do.
245
00:14:33.090 --> 00:14:36.350
You could be walking around, go to a Taco Bell,
246
00:14:36.690 --> 00:14:38.929
get a drink, throw that drink in the trash, and
247
00:14:38.950 --> 00:14:40.909
they're going to come get that cup out of that
248
00:14:40.950 --> 00:14:44.440
trash to get your DNA from that cup. And that's
249
00:14:44.460 --> 00:14:47.059
what they do. They'll follow you around and try and
250
00:14:47.100 --> 00:14:49.799
collect DNA, try and build a profile on what you're
251
00:14:49.860 --> 00:14:52.470
up to, and you'll be none the wiser. And my
252
00:14:52.500 --> 00:14:54.909
guess is they also had a phone tap going for
253
00:14:54.929 --> 00:14:59.009
them as well. Possibly the Bureau would have done that
254
00:14:59.049 --> 00:15:01.809
for them, set up surveillance, and you wait until, you know,
255
00:15:01.870 --> 00:15:04.279
he spits on the ground, he drops the tissue, he's
256
00:15:04.340 --> 00:15:06.940
at a deli, and he takes a glass, something like that,
257
00:15:07.059 --> 00:15:10.259
said McVeigh, who said agents then would have to compare
258
00:15:10.320 --> 00:15:13.980
the DNA on the discarded item to the DNA at
259
00:15:14.019 --> 00:15:15.980
the crime scene. And we know there was a ton
260
00:15:16.019 --> 00:15:18.350
of that. According to the authorities, it was a messy
261
00:15:18.389 --> 00:15:21.350
crime scene, and a lot of DNA was at this
262
00:15:21.389 --> 00:15:24.059
crime scene. Now, what we don't know is how much
263
00:15:24.100 --> 00:15:28.360
of it, if any, was the killer's. But what we
264
00:15:28.379 --> 00:15:31.200
can read between the lines here is that they did
265
00:15:31.279 --> 00:15:34.019
find his DNA and they were able to match it
266
00:15:34.320 --> 00:15:37.870
to the crime scene. But what led them to zero
267
00:15:38.009 --> 00:15:41.769
in on Koberger? The critical tip police seemed to have
268
00:15:42.070 --> 00:15:45.730
was that white Elantra. They didn't say how much they
269
00:15:45.750 --> 00:15:48.309
knew about it or where it was spotted. But on
270
00:15:48.330 --> 00:15:51.860
December 7th, police put out a public plea for information
271
00:15:51.889 --> 00:15:55.320
about that car, and thousands of tips poured in about
272
00:15:55.360 --> 00:15:59.259
the Elantra. You would think that this guy, Kohlberger, would
273
00:15:59.279 --> 00:16:01.340
be hip to the fact that he's not going to
274
00:16:01.360 --> 00:16:03.080
be able to get away with this if he owns
275
00:16:03.120 --> 00:16:06.120
this car. Then you say to yourself, did he really
276
00:16:06.139 --> 00:16:08.100
want to get away with it, or was he looking
277
00:16:08.139 --> 00:16:10.700
for the notoriety that a lot of these serial killers
278
00:16:10.720 --> 00:16:14.519
look for when they're committing these murders? Maybe the vehicle
279
00:16:14.580 --> 00:16:17.220
wasn't seen that night of the murders, but maybe it
280
00:16:17.240 --> 00:16:20.100
was seen numerous other nights where somebody has a ring
281
00:16:20.120 --> 00:16:23.610
camera And they're like, well, wait a minute. This car
282
00:16:23.669 --> 00:16:26.490
doesn't belong on the street. But for five nights in
283
00:16:26.549 --> 00:16:28.840
a row, it's been sitting here. You know, nobody gets
284
00:16:28.960 --> 00:16:31.120
out of it or something like that. So is it
285
00:16:31.139 --> 00:16:34.600
a possibility? Yes. That he picked them for a reason,
286
00:16:34.860 --> 00:16:37.500
said McVeigh. And that's really the question that we all
287
00:16:37.539 --> 00:16:40.500
have still, right? At least me, especially. I want to
288
00:16:40.539 --> 00:16:43.230
know what the motivation was. I want to know why
289
00:16:43.289 --> 00:16:45.549
he chose them. And I want to know what his
290
00:16:45.629 --> 00:16:48.470
behavior was up to this point. Was he sitting out
291
00:16:48.509 --> 00:16:51.870
there staking it out? How did he choose them? All
292
00:16:51.909 --> 00:16:54.850
of that stuff, I hope, is going to come out
293
00:16:54.929 --> 00:16:59.710
later on down the line. McVeigh said, because of the
294
00:16:59.750 --> 00:17:02.330
violent nature of the stabbings, the killer could have been
295
00:17:02.370 --> 00:17:06.150
seeking revenge or had a vendetta against one of the victims.
296
00:17:06.890 --> 00:17:09.160
And I guess that could be the case, but what
297
00:17:09.180 --> 00:17:12.900
could it possibly be? It really doesn't seem like these people...
298
00:17:13.200 --> 00:17:17.630
who were murdered, meaning Kaylee, Ethan, Madison, and Zanna, would
299
00:17:17.670 --> 00:17:20.349
share the same social group as this guy. So how
300
00:17:20.369 --> 00:17:22.769
would they even run into him ever? How would they
301
00:17:22.829 --> 00:17:26.990
know him? Or he could have targeted the house itself
302
00:17:27.299 --> 00:17:29.319
because he knew it was easy to get in and
303
00:17:29.400 --> 00:17:32.160
out of and close to the highway for a quick getaway.
304
00:17:32.579 --> 00:17:35.400
And that's possible as well. You see, all of these scenarios,
305
00:17:35.700 --> 00:17:37.960
they're all on the table still. We just don't know.
306
00:17:38.930 --> 00:17:41.450
And until we find out, until we have an official
307
00:17:41.509 --> 00:17:45.529
report about what went down, what his motivations were, it's
308
00:17:45.549 --> 00:17:49.450
going to be a lot of speculation still. Koberger was
309
00:17:49.539 --> 00:17:52.400
a PhD student with the Department of Criminal Justice and
310
00:17:52.440 --> 00:17:56.940
Criminology at Washington State University and lives on campus in Pullman,
311
00:17:57.460 --> 00:18:00.920
just eight miles from the off-campus home in Moscow where
312
00:18:00.960 --> 00:18:05.069
the four students were stabbed to death last month. It's
313
00:18:05.119 --> 00:18:07.329
odd that he was getting a doctorate in criminal justice,
314
00:18:07.609 --> 00:18:11.660
noted McVeigh. Mostly, people who go into law enforcement don't
315
00:18:11.700 --> 00:18:15.569
do that. Well, that's an understatement, huh? But unless he
316
00:18:15.609 --> 00:18:17.549
had this kind of motivation and these thoughts for a
317
00:18:17.569 --> 00:18:19.990
very long time, and he thought that going to these
318
00:18:20.069 --> 00:18:22.890
classes would aid him in getting away with it or
319
00:18:22.970 --> 00:18:26.210
planning out the murders better, we just don't know. But
320
00:18:26.289 --> 00:18:28.289
one thing I will tell you is this. If you're
321
00:18:28.329 --> 00:18:31.289
crazy enough to murder four people while they're sleeping in
322
00:18:31.329 --> 00:18:34.789
their beds, I don't put anything by you. You're literally
323
00:18:34.829 --> 00:18:40.970
capable of anything, in my opinion. Kohlberger's parents live in
324
00:18:40.990 --> 00:18:45.309
a gated neighborhood in his hometown of Albrightville, Pennsylvania. His
325
00:18:45.369 --> 00:18:48.329
parents and sisters did not answer their phones when called.
326
00:18:48.970 --> 00:18:52.779
Kohlberger will appear in court on Tuesday for extradition proceedings
327
00:18:53.140 --> 00:18:55.359
and details on what led to his arrest will be
328
00:18:55.420 --> 00:18:59.019
unsealed once he is brought back to Idaho to face charges.
329
00:18:59.460 --> 00:19:02.130
Now that's going to be very interesting. It's going to
330
00:19:02.150 --> 00:19:04.950
be very interesting to see what the probable cause was,
331
00:19:05.190 --> 00:19:07.730
what the arrest affidavit has to say, and all of
332
00:19:07.769 --> 00:19:10.690
the other court paperwork that has to be submitted when
333
00:19:10.710 --> 00:19:14.210
you have somebody like this who's facing charges. Now, that
334
00:19:14.250 --> 00:19:16.910
doesn't mean that they're not going to seal it. We
335
00:19:16.950 --> 00:19:21.529
saw down in Delphi a lot of sealing, a lot
336
00:19:21.549 --> 00:19:24.940
of redactions, and that was to protect the integrity of
337
00:19:24.980 --> 00:19:29.099
the case. So with as adamant as they have been
338
00:19:29.440 --> 00:19:32.400
about protecting the integrity of the case here, I wouldn't
339
00:19:32.420 --> 00:19:34.400
be shocked to see them try and have some sealing
340
00:19:34.829 --> 00:19:38.710
and some redactions to the documents that are released to
341
00:19:38.730 --> 00:19:41.609
the public. Now, do I know that's going to happen
342
00:19:41.630 --> 00:19:44.509
for sure? I don't. But we have seen it happen before,
343
00:19:44.829 --> 00:19:46.970
and there is precedent for that if you're trying to
344
00:19:47.009 --> 00:19:49.930
keep the case a little bit more secretive until you
345
00:19:50.299 --> 00:19:53.980
you're ready to really unleash and let the prosecution go wild.
346
00:19:54.769 --> 00:19:56.569
So it's going to be interesting to see what happens
347
00:19:56.609 --> 00:19:59.200
here as far as that goes. and if they're going
348
00:19:59.240 --> 00:20:02.279
to be transparent with the arrest affidavit, or if we're
349
00:20:02.299 --> 00:20:05.109
going to have some seals. So we'll keep our eye
350
00:20:05.190 --> 00:20:09.269
on it, obviously. And as this new information unfolds, as
351
00:20:09.329 --> 00:20:12.289
this story evolves, we'll be here every step of the way,
352
00:20:12.569 --> 00:20:15.480
like we have been from the beginning, waiting on the
353
00:20:15.519 --> 00:20:20.500
train of justice to come slamming down the tracks. All right, folks,
354
00:20:20.519 --> 00:20:22.099
that's going to do it for this one. If you'd
355
00:20:22.119 --> 00:20:24.799
like to contact me, you can do that at BobbyCapucci
356
00:20:25.140 --> 00:20:33.289
at ProtonMail.com. That's B-O-B-B-Y-C-A-P-U-C-C-I at ProtonMail.com. You can also find
357
00:20:33.329 --> 00:20:39.470
me on Twitter at B-O-B-B-Y underscore C-A-P-U-C-C-I. The link that
358
00:20:39.529 --> 00:20:43.849
I discussed can be found in the description box. Home health, baby, baby.
359
00:20:44.470 --> 00:20:48.140
What's up, everyone? And welcome back to the program. In
360
00:20:48.180 --> 00:20:50.859
this episode, we're going to dive right back into the
361
00:20:50.900 --> 00:20:54.519
court documents. And this time, we're looking at the objection
362
00:20:54.779 --> 00:21:00.000
by Brian Kohlberger to appeal, amend, and or clarify the
363
00:21:00.099 --> 00:21:04.849
non-dissemination order. And this is the argument that Brian Kohlberger's
364
00:21:04.890 --> 00:21:08.390
team is making as to why the non-dissemination order should
365
00:21:08.430 --> 00:21:12.630
stay in place. So, let's get to it. Case number CR29-22.
366
00:21:15.210 --> 00:21:19.380
Dash zero zero zero two eight zero five. The state
367
00:21:19.390 --> 00:21:25.440
of Idaho plaintiff versus Brian C. Koberger, the defendant. Comes now.
368
00:21:26.000 --> 00:21:29.920
Brian C. Koberger, by and through their attorney, J. Weston Lodgson,
369
00:21:30.299 --> 00:21:34.170
chief deputy of litigation, and hereby objects to the motion
370
00:21:34.309 --> 00:21:39.430
to appeal, amend and or clarify the non-dissemination order filed
371
00:21:39.470 --> 00:21:43.500
by Shannon Gray as counsel for the Gonsalves family. This
372
00:21:43.599 --> 00:21:47.289
objection is made on the grounds that the non-dissemination order
373
00:21:47.630 --> 00:21:52.230
properly requires Mr. Gray to abide by the clear requirement
374
00:21:52.529 --> 00:21:56.210
of the ethical rules of this state. And remember, they're
375
00:21:56.250 --> 00:21:59.660
having their hearing on May 22nd. So they're going to
376
00:21:59.690 --> 00:22:02.720
get this hammered out or at least get the discussion going.
377
00:22:04.079 --> 00:22:10.420
Argument Section 1 The court's order is not volitive of Mr.
378
00:22:10.480 --> 00:22:14.410
Gray's First Amendment rights. In his memorandum of support of
379
00:22:14.490 --> 00:22:19.240
motion for appeal and or clarification of amended non-dissemination order,
380
00:22:19.680 --> 00:22:24.559
hereafter memorandum, Mr. Gray contends that because his clients, the
381
00:22:24.599 --> 00:22:30.359
Gonsalves family, are classified as non-party citizens, application of the
382
00:22:30.420 --> 00:22:35.579
court's non-dissemination order to him constitutes a prior restraint on
383
00:22:35.619 --> 00:22:38.990
his right to free speech under the First Amendment. In
384
00:22:39.049 --> 00:22:42.390
support of this position, Mr. Gray cites the fair trial
385
00:22:42.779 --> 00:22:47.299
and public disclosure provision of the ABA Standard for Criminal Justice,
386
00:22:47.759 --> 00:22:53.240
IRPC 3.6, as well as the precedent established under Shepard v. Maxwell,
387
00:22:53.240 --> 00:22:56.369
384 U.S. 333, 1966, Nebraska Press Association v. Stewart, 427 U.S. 539, 1976,
388
00:22:56.369 --> 00:23:09.579
and Gentile v. the State Bar of Nevada, 501 U.S.
389
00:23:09.579 --> 00:23:14.259
1030 1991. The issue at hand may be summarized as follows,
390
00:23:14.740 --> 00:23:19.140
whether application of a non-dissemination order to an attorney representing
391
00:23:19.180 --> 00:23:23.740
the family of an alleged murder victim constitutes an intolerable
392
00:23:23.819 --> 00:23:29.119
prior restraint on speech. The First Amendment prohibits laws abridging
393
00:23:29.160 --> 00:23:31.990
the freedom of speech, while the Six guarantees to the
394
00:23:32.029 --> 00:23:35.289
criminal defendant the right to a speedy and public trial
395
00:23:35.930 --> 00:23:40.720
by an impartial jury. Occasionally in conflict, where protected pretrial
396
00:23:40.759 --> 00:23:44.880
expression threatens the impartiality of the jury, the United States
397
00:23:44.900 --> 00:23:49.109
Supreme Court has determined certain parties' First Amendment rights may
398
00:23:49.150 --> 00:23:52.829
be limited when exercise of those rights would result in
399
00:23:52.890 --> 00:23:56.559
prejudice to the defendant, noting, with their life at stake,
400
00:23:56.880 --> 00:23:59.970
it is not requiring too much that the defendant be
401
00:24:00.029 --> 00:24:04.289
tried in an atmosphere undisturbed by so huge a wave
402
00:24:04.369 --> 00:24:07.470
of public passion. Shepard, 384 U.S. at 351, quoting Irvin v. Dowd,
403
00:24:07.470 --> 00:24:08.970
266 U.S. 717, 728, and 1961, as a means of
404
00:24:08.990 --> 00:24:12.329
reducing the appearance of prejudicial material and to protect the
405
00:24:12.690 --> 00:24:27.430
jury from outside influence. A trial court, may prescribe extrajudicial
406
00:24:27.490 --> 00:24:31.650
statements by any lawyer, party, witness, or court official, and
407
00:24:31.690 --> 00:24:36.460
may also promulgate a regulation with respect to dissemination of
408
00:24:36.500 --> 00:24:44.710
information of information about the case. Shepard 384 U.S. at 358-62.
409
00:24:45.220 --> 00:24:48.539
In either case, the cure lies in those remedial measures
410
00:24:48.799 --> 00:24:52.579
that will prevent the prejudice at its inception. ID 384 U.S.
411
00:24:54.380 --> 00:24:59.500
at 363. One such measure is at issue here. As
412
00:24:59.619 --> 00:25:03.640
in Stewart, this court is presented with a confrontation between
413
00:25:03.720 --> 00:25:08.670
prior restraint imposed to protect one vital constitutional guarantee and
414
00:25:08.710 --> 00:25:12.230
the explicit command of another that the freedom to speak
415
00:25:12.509 --> 00:25:15.029
shall not be abridged. Stewart, 427 U.S. at 570. Unlike
416
00:25:15.079 --> 00:25:22.039
in Stewart, however, The regulation at issue is as to
417
00:25:22.099 --> 00:25:26.039
an attorney who may be subjected to greater limitations than
418
00:25:26.099 --> 00:25:29.599
could be imposed on the press, as the Supreme Court
419
00:25:29.660 --> 00:25:33.660
noted in Shepard. The court must take such steps by
420
00:25:33.740 --> 00:25:38.650
rule and regulation that will protect their processes from prejudicial
421
00:25:38.789 --> 00:25:44.849
outside interferences. Neither prosecutors. counsels for defense, the accused, witnesses,
422
00:25:45.130 --> 00:25:49.170
court staff, nor enforcement officers coming under the jurisdiction of
423
00:25:49.210 --> 00:25:53.710
the court should be permitted to frustrate its function. Collaboration
424
00:25:53.750 --> 00:25:57.349
between counsel and the press as to information affecting the
425
00:25:57.410 --> 00:26:01.369
fairness of a criminal trial is not only subject to regulation,
426
00:26:01.650 --> 00:26:10.880
but is highly censorable and worthy of disciplinary action. Shepard 384, U.S. 363.
427
00:26:10.880 --> 00:26:15.200
This holding was expressly upheld in genteel, wherein the Supreme
428
00:26:15.240 --> 00:26:19.000
Court found the speech of lawyers representing clients in pending
429
00:26:19.019 --> 00:26:23.470
cases may be regulated under a less demanding standard than
430
00:26:23.529 --> 00:26:28.009
that established for regulation of the press in Stewart and
431
00:26:28.049 --> 00:26:32.230
the cases which preceded it. Lawyers representing clients in pending
432
00:26:32.250 --> 00:26:36.329
cases are key participants in the criminal justice system and
433
00:26:36.369 --> 00:26:39.910
the state may demand some adherence to the precepts of
434
00:26:39.970 --> 00:26:43.829
that system in regulating their speech as well as their conduct.
435
00:26:44.430 --> 00:26:49.680
Gentile 501 U.S. at 1074. In an attempt to exclude
436
00:26:49.700 --> 00:26:53.299
himself from these holdings, Mr. Gray argues that because his
437
00:26:53.359 --> 00:26:56.759
clients are not parties to the case and therefore are
438
00:26:56.799 --> 00:27:00.079
not subject to the order, see Memorandum page 3, 6
439
00:27:00.079 --> 00:27:03.269
and 8, he too is due an equal measure of
440
00:27:03.369 --> 00:27:06.930
deference and exclusion. The weight of authority is contrary to
441
00:27:06.990 --> 00:27:12.910
his position. In Idaho State Bar v. TAP 129 Idaho
442
00:27:12.910 --> 00:27:20.589
414 925 P. 2D 1113 1996, the Idaho Supreme Court made
443
00:27:20.630 --> 00:27:24.759
it clear that courts must strike a reasonable balance between
444
00:27:24.779 --> 00:27:28.039
the right of free speech and the state's legitimate interest
445
00:27:28.339 --> 00:27:32.240
in preserving the integrity of its judicial system. TAP 129
446
00:27:32.240 --> 00:27:41.289
Idaho 414 at 417-925-P.2D at 1116. In reaching this conclusion,
447
00:27:41.569 --> 00:27:45.160
the TAP court relied upon the genteel decision, which, in
448
00:27:45.180 --> 00:27:48.420
the court's words, balanced the state's interest in assuring fair
449
00:27:48.460 --> 00:27:53.559
trials against the free speech interests of attorneys. Thus, a
450
00:27:53.579 --> 00:27:58.500
case associated, speaker's status as a lawyer's, alters the degree
451
00:27:58.740 --> 00:28:02.950
to which their speech is protected. This lawyer versus non-lawyer
452
00:28:02.990 --> 00:28:07.349
distinction is recognized broadly elsewhere, even in cases where the
453
00:28:07.410 --> 00:28:10.609
speaker attorney claims not to be involved with the case
454
00:28:10.849 --> 00:28:18.259
in question. Good, 821 F. 3D, 553 Fifth Circuit, 2016. The
455
00:28:19.059 --> 00:28:22.539
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals considered whether an attorney who
456
00:28:22.579 --> 00:28:26.519
routinely communicated with and occasionally passed notes to the defense
457
00:28:26.799 --> 00:28:30.250
could be sanctioned for violation of of a non-dissemination order
458
00:28:30.589 --> 00:28:34.089
and the Louisiana criminal trial publicity rule because he was
459
00:28:34.150 --> 00:28:38.390
not a lawyer associated with the defense or trial participants.
460
00:28:39.089 --> 00:28:43.369
Application to whom, Good argued, the local rule was limited.
461
00:28:44.049 --> 00:28:50.069
Good 821 F. 3D at 557. Rejecting Good's argument, the court
462
00:28:50.109 --> 00:28:54.930
relied upon Gentile's own language that because associated lawyers have
463
00:28:54.990 --> 00:28:59.539
special access to information and Through discovery and client communications,
464
00:28:59.980 --> 00:29:03.759
their extrajudicial statements pose a threat to the fairness of
465
00:29:03.819 --> 00:29:07.220
a pending proceeding since lawyer's statements are likely to be
466
00:29:07.279 --> 00:29:17.490
received as especially authoritative. Similar holdings have been reached across
467
00:29:17.529 --> 00:29:27.660
the circuit courts. See Mezabal v. Allen, 411F. 3D. 712, 6th Circuit, 2005. Morrissey, 168. F. 3D, 134.
468
00:29:27.650 --> 00:29:30.799
Fourth Circuit, 1999. Berner vs. Del Honte, 129. F. 3D, 20.
469
00:29:30.799 --> 00:29:53.299
First Circuit. U.S. vs. Cutler, 58. Further, the 11th and
470
00:29:53.599 --> 00:29:58.660
2nd Circuits have interpreted the heavy presumption against constitutionality described
471
00:29:58.700 --> 00:30:02.869
in Stewart as being unique to prior restraints directed to
472
00:30:02.890 --> 00:30:07.009
the press and suggested the Supreme Court's shepherd holding as
473
00:30:07.069 --> 00:30:13.019
suggesting a restrictive order limiting extrajudicial commentary of trial participants
474
00:30:13.470 --> 00:30:16.680
as an alternative to a prior restraint on the media.
475
00:30:17.819 --> 00:30:24.009
The News Journal Corp. v. Foxman, 939 F. 2F, 1499, 1512-13,
476
00:30:24.990 --> 00:30:33.730
11th Circuit, 1991. See also ZAL 968 F. 2D at 928.
477
00:30:33.730 --> 00:30:37.950
Lawyers representing clients in pending cases may be regulated under
478
00:30:37.990 --> 00:30:41.690
a less demanding standard than that established for regulation of
479
00:30:41.730 --> 00:30:47.440
the press. quoting Gentile at 501, U.S. at 1074. As
480
00:30:47.519 --> 00:30:51.289
in good, Mr. Gray has special access to information via
481
00:30:51.329 --> 00:30:55.589
his clients. Dissemination of information forbidden by the court's order
482
00:30:55.890 --> 00:30:59.390
would be deemed authoritative as a result of this access
483
00:30:59.910 --> 00:31:03.799
and Mr. Gray's status as an attorney, and therefore would
484
00:31:03.859 --> 00:31:08.440
endanger the jury's impartiality. The court's exemption of Mr. Gray's
485
00:31:08.500 --> 00:31:13.339
client's from its order effectively answers Mr. Gray's First Amendment concerns,
486
00:31:13.799 --> 00:31:17.400
while its continued application to him accounts for his apparent
487
00:31:17.440 --> 00:31:24.420
authority and special access to the facts. Section 2. IRPC 3.6
488
00:31:24.420 --> 00:31:27.839
is not fashionably vague nor vague as applied to Mr.
489
00:31:27.900 --> 00:31:32.289
Gray's circumstances. Mr. Gray then argues that even if the
490
00:31:32.390 --> 00:31:35.930
court may order him not to disseminate information to the press,
491
00:31:36.450 --> 00:31:41.579
because the court's order mirrors the language of of IRPC 3.6
492
00:31:41.579 --> 00:31:44.279
it is vague on its face and as applied to
493
00:31:44.319 --> 00:31:49.509
his circumstances first IRPC 3.6 in no way is vague
494
00:31:49.809 --> 00:31:53.250
on its face Mr. Gray's argument on this point is
495
00:31:53.349 --> 00:31:57.250
premised on a faulty understanding and misreading of the genteel
496
00:31:57.289 --> 00:32:01.630
holding and genteel the Supreme Court expressly stated we are
497
00:32:01.670 --> 00:32:06.490
not called upon to determine the constitutionality of ABA model
498
00:32:06.529 --> 00:32:12.150
rule 3.6 1981 but only Rule 117 as it has
499
00:32:12.190 --> 00:32:16.990
been interpreted and applied by the state of Nevada. Gentile
500
00:32:16.990 --> 00:32:22.190
501 U.S. at 1036. Moreover, the Supreme Court held nothing
501
00:32:22.250 --> 00:32:27.029
inherent in Nevada's formulation of the trial publicity rule fails
502
00:32:27.109 --> 00:32:32.119
First Amendment review. But as this case demonstrates, Rule 117
503
00:32:32.119 --> 00:32:36.240
has not been interpreted in conformance with those principles by
504
00:32:36.279 --> 00:32:41.180
the Nevada Supreme Court. Gray's assertion that Gentile's court held
505
00:32:41.220 --> 00:32:45.710
that the wording of Rules 3.6 and 3.8 was unconstitutionally
506
00:32:45.769 --> 00:32:50.349
vague is simply wrong, because Gentile only found that the
507
00:32:50.410 --> 00:32:55.099
rule was unconstitutional as applied. That decision does not mandate
508
00:32:55.130 --> 00:33:00.240
a similar finding when evaluating IRPC 3.6. To the contrary,
509
00:33:00.660 --> 00:33:05.319
the Supreme Court's expressed finding that nothing inherent In Nevada's rule,
510
00:33:05.640 --> 00:33:09.819
failed First Amendment review indicates that the same conclusion is
511
00:33:09.880 --> 00:33:15.059
appropriate with regard to IRPC 3.6, which, as Mr. Gray
512
00:33:15.099 --> 00:33:20.339
himself states, is similar in wording to ABA Rule 3.6. Mr.
513
00:33:20.380 --> 00:33:26.289
Gray's argument that IRPC 3.6 is unconstitutionally vague as applied
514
00:33:26.349 --> 00:33:31.250
to his own circumstances is also faulty. In Gentile, the
515
00:33:31.289 --> 00:33:35.150
Supreme Court found that one central point must dominate the
516
00:33:35.230 --> 00:33:40.309
court as applied vagueness analysis. This case involves political speech.
517
00:33:40.789 --> 00:33:44.420
At issue here is the constitutionality of a ban on
518
00:33:44.460 --> 00:33:50.059
political speech, critical of the government and its officials. Gentile
519
00:33:50.059 --> 00:33:53.799
501 U.S. at 1034. Well, it is true that Mr.
520
00:33:53.880 --> 00:33:57.420
Gray and the Gonsalves family have criticized the police in
521
00:33:57.460 --> 00:34:01.119
this matter in the past, Since Mr. Koberger's arrest, their
522
00:34:01.180 --> 00:34:06.369
statements have been focused on him. CEG King 5, father
523
00:34:06.430 --> 00:34:12.050
of Idaho murder victim, says Koberger was overwhelmed in court. Additionally,
524
00:34:12.469 --> 00:34:15.849
at issue in Gentile was the confusion created by the
525
00:34:15.889 --> 00:34:22.059
Safe Harbor exception for statements by the defense about their defense. Mr.
526
00:34:22.099 --> 00:34:25.199
Gray has essentially agreed his client is not a real
527
00:34:25.239 --> 00:34:27.820
party to this action and has nothing similar to a
528
00:34:27.860 --> 00:34:31.889
defendant's interest in sharing their defense with the press. Thus,
529
00:34:32.170 --> 00:34:36.289
the vagueness found in Gentile's in opposite to his concerns.
530
00:34:37.110 --> 00:34:41.909
Section 3. As an attorney, Mr. Gray cannot claim vicarious
531
00:34:41.969 --> 00:34:45.800
exemption from the rules of professional conduct and is therefore
532
00:34:45.860 --> 00:34:51.559
bound by IRPC 3.6. Finally, Mr. Gray asserts that he
533
00:34:51.619 --> 00:34:55.219
is allowed to relay to the media any of the opinions, views,
534
00:34:55.280 --> 00:34:59.139
or statements of those family members regarding any any part
535
00:34:59.280 --> 00:35:03.039
of the case, regardless of the rules of professional conduct,
536
00:35:03.380 --> 00:35:06.320
because it would place an undue burden on the victim's
537
00:35:06.360 --> 00:35:10.420
families if the attorney whom they retained to represent their
538
00:35:10.500 --> 00:35:15.099
interests was prohibited from serving as their spokesperson to the
539
00:35:15.139 --> 00:35:19.199
media and other parties in transmitting the victim's family's thoughts
540
00:35:19.659 --> 00:35:24.179
and opinions. His assertion of vicarious exemption from the rules
541
00:35:24.239 --> 00:35:28.789
of professional conduct is plainly baseless. You made this happen.
542
00:35:29.429 --> 00:35:34.230
Besides being entirely inconsistent with the above provided precedent, Mr.
543
00:35:34.309 --> 00:35:37.889
Gray's position on this issue is contrary to the long-held
544
00:35:37.929 --> 00:35:42.219
acknowledgement that, even outside the courtroom, lawyers in pending cases
545
00:35:42.659 --> 00:35:46.659
are subject to ethical restrictions on speech, which an ordinary
546
00:35:46.719 --> 00:35:51.260
citizen would not be. Such as has always been the case,
547
00:35:51.860 --> 00:35:56.280
as membership in the bar is a privilege burdened with conditions. Third,
548
00:35:56.340 --> 00:35:58.780
versus the United States, 354 U.S., 278, 281, 1957. Quoting in, Rouse, 221,
549
00:35:58.760 --> 00:35:59.940
New York, 81, 84, 116, NE, 782, 783, 1917. Boy,
550
00:35:59.960 --> 00:36:03.679
going all the way back to 1917 for that precedent, huh? Mr.
551
00:36:03.679 --> 00:36:06.739
Gray's representation of the Gonsalves family does not entitle him
552
00:36:06.760 --> 00:36:24.619
to the same degree of freedom of speech... they enjoy
553
00:36:24.760 --> 00:36:28.219
as ordinary citizens. Further, Mr. Gray makes it clear that,
554
00:36:28.760 --> 00:36:31.599
if his motion is granted, he will comment on the
555
00:36:31.639 --> 00:36:37.980
case and other issues surrounding the investigation pursuant to Rule 3.6.
556
00:36:37.980 --> 00:36:41.619
What portion of Rule 3.6 Mr. Gray invokes here is
557
00:36:41.659 --> 00:36:45.710
an open question. Insofar as the rule addresses Mr. Gray's
558
00:36:45.750 --> 00:36:49.969
intended subject matter, it expressly identifies it as a subject
559
00:36:50.340 --> 00:36:54.670
more likely than not to have material prejudicial effect on
560
00:36:54.710 --> 00:36:58.630
a proceeding, particularly when they refer to a criminal matter
561
00:36:59.090 --> 00:37:05.530
or any other proceeding that could result in incarceration. IRPC 3.6,
562
00:37:05.530 --> 00:37:09.409
comment number 5. Indeed, the rule notes that criminal jury
563
00:37:09.449 --> 00:37:15.559
trials will be most sensitive to extrajudicial speech. IRPC 3.6,
564
00:37:15.559 --> 00:37:19.130
comment number 6. Mr. Gray argues he will not be
565
00:37:19.210 --> 00:37:22.730
offering up his own opinion regarding the facts surrounding the case,
566
00:37:23.250 --> 00:37:27.789
but rather only serving as his client's spokesperson conduit to
567
00:37:27.829 --> 00:37:31.679
the media and other parties in transmitting the victim's family's
568
00:37:31.739 --> 00:37:36.480
thoughts and opinions. Far from mitigating the already tenuous nature
569
00:37:36.519 --> 00:37:40.239
of this argument, this signal of intent again places Mr.
570
00:37:40.300 --> 00:37:44.849
Gray at odds with Rule 3.6 and Gentile. the court
571
00:37:45.070 --> 00:37:48.829
has already exempted Mr. Gray's clients from its order, adequately
572
00:37:48.889 --> 00:37:53.349
preserving their First Amendment rights. To extend this exemption to Mr.
573
00:37:53.409 --> 00:37:58.230
Gray would function solely to grant potentially prejudicial statements, the
574
00:37:58.269 --> 00:38:02.159
weight recognized as a danger by the genteel court on
575
00:38:02.219 --> 00:38:07.639
a subject the rule distinguishes as already extremely susceptible to prejudice.
576
00:38:08.139 --> 00:38:11.579
If Mr. Gray truly intends only to voice his clients'
577
00:38:11.619 --> 00:38:15.849
thoughts and opinions... then the court's previous exemption has already
578
00:38:15.949 --> 00:38:20.150
cured the supposed First Amendment infirmity. Mr. Gray's clients may
579
00:38:20.230 --> 00:38:23.489
voice these thoughts and opinions themselves as they clearly have
580
00:38:23.510 --> 00:38:26.889
been doing. The sole effect of maintaining the court's order
581
00:38:27.250 --> 00:38:31.030
in present form is the continued operation of a remedial
582
00:38:31.110 --> 00:38:35.800
measure that prevents prejudice at its inception. Mr. Gray is
583
00:38:35.860 --> 00:38:38.940
bound by the rules of professional conduct and the First
584
00:38:38.980 --> 00:38:43.050
Amendment does not excuse him from that obligation. This was
585
00:38:43.130 --> 00:38:47.750
dated February 8th, and it was signed by Jay Lodson,
586
00:38:48.769 --> 00:38:54.250
the chief deputy litigation assigned attorney to Brian Kohlberger. All right, folks.
587
00:38:54.289 --> 00:38:57.550
So with this hearing coming up about this issue, I
588
00:38:57.590 --> 00:39:00.250
thought this would be a solid add to the catalog
589
00:39:00.269 --> 00:39:03.369
to give us an idea of what the argument is here.
590
00:39:03.880 --> 00:39:07.360
And obviously, after they have this hearing on May 22nd,
591
00:39:07.639 --> 00:39:10.679
we'll have an episode breaking it all down. But until then,
592
00:39:11.039 --> 00:39:14.670
we'll continue to swim through this muck looking for some clarity.
593
00:39:15.449 --> 00:39:17.190
All right, folks, that's going to do it for this one.
594
00:39:17.610 --> 00:39:20.190
All of the information that goes with the episode can
595
00:39:20.230 --> 00:39:23.820
be found in the description box. And welcome back to
596
00:39:23.860 --> 00:39:29.619
the program. So Brian Koberger is requesting more time to decide.
597
00:39:30.139 --> 00:39:33.320
about offering an alibi. And how do we know that?
598
00:39:33.599 --> 00:39:36.940
Because there were new court filings that hit the docket.
599
00:39:37.940 --> 00:39:42.139
And these new filings occurred on Monday. So they're definitely
600
00:39:42.400 --> 00:39:45.519
working behind the scenes double time in the camp of
601
00:39:45.539 --> 00:39:50.260
Brian Koberger, trying to formulate a strategy for a defense here. Now,
602
00:39:50.400 --> 00:39:52.639
what they're going to come up with, your guess is
603
00:39:52.739 --> 00:39:55.320
as good as mine, because as much as I've racked
604
00:39:55.360 --> 00:39:58.000
my brain and tried to play the devil's advocate here,
605
00:39:58.739 --> 00:40:02.360
I don't know how Brian Kohlberger plans to explain away
606
00:40:02.920 --> 00:40:05.539
all of the evidence that has been presented thus far
607
00:40:05.860 --> 00:40:09.280
against them, never mind what they have hidden up their sleeve.
608
00:40:10.059 --> 00:40:13.530
So today, we have an article from ABC News and
609
00:40:13.550 --> 00:40:18.030
the headline. Idaho College murder suspect Brian Kohlberger requests more
610
00:40:18.070 --> 00:40:23.010
time to decide offering an alibi. This article was authored
611
00:40:23.070 --> 00:40:28.239
by Sasha Pezenik. The man accused of killing four Idaho
612
00:40:28.280 --> 00:40:31.420
College students is asking the court for more time to
613
00:40:31.460 --> 00:40:35.019
decide whether to offer an alibi as he prepares to
614
00:40:35.059 --> 00:40:39.139
mount his defense at trial this fall, according to new
615
00:40:39.179 --> 00:40:43.340
court documents. Brian Kohlberger's lawyer said in a motion filed Friday,
616
00:40:43.820 --> 00:40:48.510
That because of the voluminous discovery process, which is still ongoing,
617
00:40:48.889 --> 00:40:52.130
and because they're still investigating the charges against their client,
618
00:40:52.489 --> 00:40:56.570
deciding now would be at a minimum premature as wading
619
00:40:56.610 --> 00:41:00.690
through the extensive information that makes up the case is incomplete.
620
00:41:01.289 --> 00:41:03.949
Sounds like a bunch of hogwash to me. What's his alibi?
621
00:41:03.989 --> 00:41:06.239
Where was he? and who had eyes on him at
622
00:41:06.280 --> 00:41:09.179
the time when these murders occurred. You would think that
623
00:41:09.219 --> 00:41:12.239
you'd have your alibi all wrapped up nice and tight
624
00:41:12.360 --> 00:41:14.610
with a little bow on it, but that doesn't seem
625
00:41:14.639 --> 00:41:16.969
to be what's going on with Kohlberger here, and he
626
00:41:16.989 --> 00:41:20.469
can't even offer up an alibi. So, how is it
627
00:41:20.530 --> 00:41:23.510
that he's going to get himself off these charges when
628
00:41:23.530 --> 00:41:26.909
something basic as far as an alibi hasn't even been
629
00:41:26.969 --> 00:41:30.539
provided as of yet? There's a question for all of
630
00:41:30.579 --> 00:41:35.329
you contrarians out there who think Brian Kohlberger is innocent. Additionally,
631
00:41:35.510 --> 00:41:39.909
deciding at this juncture may tread into disclosures of protected information,
632
00:41:39.949 --> 00:41:42.510
they said. Oh, it may, huh? You would think that
633
00:41:42.550 --> 00:41:44.869
if you had an alibi, you'd be screaming about it
634
00:41:45.090 --> 00:41:47.570
from the rooftop. I know that if I was accused
635
00:41:47.610 --> 00:41:50.150
of crimes such as these, I'd be yelling and screaming
636
00:41:50.329 --> 00:41:53.550
for everybody to hear me. My alibi is this. Go
637
00:41:53.679 --> 00:41:56.639
ask Johnny. We were down at the local pub doing
638
00:41:56.679 --> 00:42:00.639
shots of Jägermeister. But no, we haven't heard anything like that,
639
00:42:00.679 --> 00:42:04.500
have we? Instead, it's about the process. It's about the technicalities.
640
00:42:04.980 --> 00:42:07.780
And that's how it always will be for people who
641
00:42:07.820 --> 00:42:11.010
are not innocent. Now, it's one thing when you're innocent
642
00:42:11.489 --> 00:42:14.650
and you're attacking the process as well as providing some
643
00:42:14.730 --> 00:42:18.150
evidence for why you're innocent. But when people are only
644
00:42:18.210 --> 00:42:21.440
attacking the process... One thing that I have certainly learned
645
00:42:21.820 --> 00:42:24.380
over the past few years that we've been following this stuff,
646
00:42:24.800 --> 00:42:27.110
when it's a complete attack of the process looking for
647
00:42:27.139 --> 00:42:31.690
loopholes and technicalities, it usually means that the person doing
648
00:42:31.730 --> 00:42:35.389
that is guilty and that their legal team has no
649
00:42:35.489 --> 00:42:38.489
other way to go after the case and try and
650
00:42:38.530 --> 00:42:41.849
destroy the foundation that it's built upon. And this defense
651
00:42:41.869 --> 00:42:45.769
strategy thus far is oozing with all sorts of signs
652
00:42:46.190 --> 00:42:49.940
of exactly that. Kohlberger's defense says It needs time to
653
00:42:49.980 --> 00:42:54.920
make this determination and consider evidentiary rules. Now, I don't
654
00:42:54.960 --> 00:42:57.380
disagree with that. There's a lot of discovery to get
655
00:42:57.420 --> 00:42:59.760
through here. And that's why I said from the beginning,
656
00:43:00.199 --> 00:43:02.280
I don't think this trial kicks off when they say
657
00:43:02.320 --> 00:43:05.539
it's going to in October. I think we're looking at
658
00:43:05.940 --> 00:43:09.300
a summer of 2024 type of start date for this.
659
00:43:09.960 --> 00:43:13.400
And the reason being is that the discovery is massive.
660
00:43:13.860 --> 00:43:16.980
We're talking three trilobites so far of information that they've
661
00:43:17.000 --> 00:43:21.429
handed over, meaning the prosecution. So the defense, obviously, they
662
00:43:21.469 --> 00:43:23.190
have to go through all of that with a fine
663
00:43:23.210 --> 00:43:27.010
tooth comb. And it's going to take time. So I
664
00:43:27.030 --> 00:43:30.280
highly doubt this trial kicks off in October, like they said.
665
00:43:30.719 --> 00:43:32.960
And you're getting a bunch of little tells about that
666
00:43:33.579 --> 00:43:35.760
along the way. And this is certainly one of them.
667
00:43:36.059 --> 00:43:38.659
When they start complaining or bringing up the fact that
668
00:43:38.940 --> 00:43:41.480
there's a lot of evidence to go through, that's usually
669
00:43:41.559 --> 00:43:44.460
a sign that they're going to ask for the trial
670
00:43:44.500 --> 00:43:48.429
to be delayed a little bit. The Latah County Prosecutor's
671
00:43:48.510 --> 00:43:51.590
Office leading the case against Kohlberger put in their demand
672
00:43:51.630 --> 00:43:54.849
for his notice of alibi a day after his May
673
00:43:55.170 --> 00:43:59.489
22nd arraignment. According to Idaho law, defendants are supposed to
674
00:43:59.530 --> 00:44:03.050
respond to that demand within 10 days or at such
675
00:44:03.110 --> 00:44:06.179
different time as the court may direct with a written
676
00:44:06.219 --> 00:44:09.039
statement of where they claim to have been at the
677
00:44:09.059 --> 00:44:12.300
time of the alleged crime, along with the identities of
678
00:44:12.340 --> 00:44:15.800
the witnesses on whom they plan to rely on for
679
00:44:15.840 --> 00:44:19.039
that alibi. Now, I'm sure that there's some legal mind
680
00:44:19.099 --> 00:44:22.780
out there that understands this way better than me. But
681
00:44:22.820 --> 00:44:25.110
it seems like if you have an alibi, that's one
682
00:44:25.130 --> 00:44:27.570
of the first things you want to talk about. Hey,
683
00:44:27.610 --> 00:44:30.730
go talk to so-and-so. We were hanging out. I didn't
684
00:44:30.769 --> 00:44:32.610
do this. Why am I even in jail right now?
685
00:44:33.050 --> 00:44:35.889
And if Brian Kohlberger was hanging out with people around
686
00:44:35.929 --> 00:44:39.329
this time when these murders occurred, do you really think
687
00:44:39.349 --> 00:44:41.300
he'd still be sitting in jail right now? Or do
688
00:44:41.320 --> 00:44:43.360
you think that Ann Taylor would be making a big
689
00:44:43.400 --> 00:44:45.840
deal about it? Of course, she'd be making a big
690
00:44:45.880 --> 00:44:48.420
deal about it to get him bailed out. And I'm
691
00:44:48.460 --> 00:44:50.159
sure the judge would look at that and say, hey,
692
00:44:50.179 --> 00:44:51.800
you know what? This guy has an alibi. What are
693
00:44:51.820 --> 00:44:54.659
you guys talking about here? But none of that's occurred.
694
00:44:55.139 --> 00:44:57.969
All we have seen is the massive pile of evidence
695
00:44:58.409 --> 00:45:01.590
that is being built against Brian Kohlberger. And it all
696
00:45:01.630 --> 00:45:04.889
looks damning. Each piece of evidence that we receive, as
697
00:45:04.929 --> 00:45:07.860
the public even, is more damning than the last one.
698
00:45:08.460 --> 00:45:10.800
The defense is asking the court for more time to
699
00:45:10.840 --> 00:45:14.329
decide or to make an exception to that rule. They
700
00:45:14.429 --> 00:45:16.730
ask that if the court is not inclined to grant
701
00:45:16.750 --> 00:45:20.949
their request, a hearing be set to present oral argument, evidence,
702
00:45:21.219 --> 00:45:25.059
and or testimony in support of their motion. No ruling
703
00:45:25.460 --> 00:45:28.059
has yet been issued. And I have my eye on
704
00:45:28.079 --> 00:45:31.659
those court documents, obviously, every single day. And when we
705
00:45:31.679 --> 00:45:34.559
get a ruling, we'll have it updated. I plan on
706
00:45:34.659 --> 00:45:37.579
adding some more documents to the catalog over the week.
707
00:45:38.000 --> 00:45:40.539
That way, we're not behind and we're all up to
708
00:45:40.579 --> 00:45:45.000
date on what's going on behind the scenes. Neither Kohlberger's
709
00:45:45.059 --> 00:45:49.340
attorneys nor prosecutors immediately responded to requests for comment for
710
00:45:49.380 --> 00:45:52.469
this story from ABC News, and they're not going to
711
00:45:52.510 --> 00:45:55.650
comment because of the gag order. The judge in the
712
00:45:55.670 --> 00:45:59.630
case has issued an order largely barring both parties from
713
00:45:59.710 --> 00:46:04.769
speaking publicly about the investigation or pending prosecution outside of court.
714
00:46:05.369 --> 00:46:09.269
And just quickly, talking about judges, there wasn't a sudden
715
00:46:09.329 --> 00:46:13.119
shift in judges in this case. What happened was, The
716
00:46:13.159 --> 00:46:16.380
case originally hit Megan Marshall's office because she is a
717
00:46:16.420 --> 00:46:20.079
lower court. But now that it's progressed and he's been arraigned,
718
00:46:20.340 --> 00:46:22.590
it moves on to the next level of the court system.
719
00:46:22.929 --> 00:46:26.010
And that means it ends up in Judge John Judge's
720
00:46:26.070 --> 00:46:28.949
courtroom and not Judge Marshall's. And I know there was
721
00:46:28.969 --> 00:46:32.269
some confusion there about that issue. So that's what happened.
722
00:46:32.329 --> 00:46:35.780
It's nothing, you know, sinister or anything like that. That's
723
00:46:35.800 --> 00:46:38.119
just how the court system works. You get arraigned in
724
00:46:38.219 --> 00:46:40.699
one court and then you move on to the next level.
725
00:46:41.210 --> 00:46:44.590
and Idaho has a tiered court system that functions in
726
00:46:44.630 --> 00:46:49.329
that manner. Koberger, 28, was indicted last month in charge
727
00:46:49.389 --> 00:46:52.789
with four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary.
728
00:46:53.409 --> 00:46:56.179
At his arraignment in late May, Koberger declined to offer
729
00:46:56.219 --> 00:46:59.239
a plea, so the judge entered a not guilty plea
730
00:46:59.639 --> 00:47:03.260
on his behalf. A trial date has been set for
731
00:47:03.440 --> 00:47:08.039
October 2nd. Prosecutors allege that in the early morning hours
732
00:47:08.099 --> 00:47:13.800
of November 13, 2022, Kohlberger, a criminology Ph.D. student at
733
00:47:13.840 --> 00:47:18.119
Washington State University, broke into an off-campus home and stabbed
734
00:47:18.139 --> 00:47:23.130
to death four University of Idaho students, Ethan Chapin, Madison Mogan,
735
00:47:23.510 --> 00:47:28.989
Zanna Kernodle, and Kaylee Gonsalves. After a more than six-week hunt,
736
00:47:29.309 --> 00:47:33.349
police zeroed in on Kohlberger as a suspect, tracking his
737
00:47:33.389 --> 00:47:37.570
white Hyundai Elantra, cell phone, signal data, And recovering, what
738
00:47:37.610 --> 00:47:41.329
authorities say, was his DNA on a knife sheath found
739
00:47:41.630 --> 00:47:45.150
next to one of the victim's bodies, according to court documents.
740
00:47:45.730 --> 00:47:48.329
And that's the glue that binds it all together. That
741
00:47:48.369 --> 00:47:52.250
DNA on that knife sheath ties all that other evidence
742
00:47:52.469 --> 00:47:54.829
up in a nice little bow. And if you look
743
00:47:54.869 --> 00:47:58.360
at this evidence piecemeal, yeah, it doesn't look like it's
744
00:47:58.550 --> 00:48:00.780
a slam dunk. But when you look at all of
745
00:48:00.820 --> 00:48:04.579
the evidence combined, it makes all of that evidence that
746
00:48:04.639 --> 00:48:08.739
much stronger. And Brian Kohlberger and his team, they're going
747
00:48:08.760 --> 00:48:11.460
to have a big problem contending with all of that
748
00:48:11.539 --> 00:48:15.219
evidence balled into one. T-Mobile 5 was arrested on December
749
00:48:15.280 --> 00:48:19.239
30th in Pennsylvania after driving cross-country to spend the holidays
750
00:48:19.320 --> 00:48:23.300
at his family home in Albrightville, Pennsylvania. Since the time
751
00:48:23.340 --> 00:48:28.550
of Kohlberger's arrest, the prosecution has disclosed roughly 51 terabytes
752
00:48:28.570 --> 00:48:32.460
of information. as part of the discovery process, including thousands
753
00:48:32.500 --> 00:48:36.280
of pages of discovery, thousands of photographs, hundreds of hours
754
00:48:36.320 --> 00:48:41.239
of recordings, further, many gigabytes of electronic phone record and
755
00:48:41.320 --> 00:48:45.360
social media data, according to court documents. So they dropped
756
00:48:45.429 --> 00:48:48.429
a whole ass ton of information in the laps of
757
00:48:48.489 --> 00:48:50.949
the defense. Now, they have to have time to go
758
00:48:50.989 --> 00:48:53.369
through all of that. So like I said earlier in
759
00:48:53.409 --> 00:48:56.929
this episode, I don't see the trial, unfortunately, kicking off
760
00:48:57.550 --> 00:49:00.929
at the start date of October 2nd, like they're hoping.
761
00:49:01.559 --> 00:49:04.760
And that all is based on the gigantic amount of
762
00:49:04.860 --> 00:49:08.659
evidence that has to be gone through here. Mr. Kohlberger's
763
00:49:08.699 --> 00:49:13.199
investigation and preparation of his defense is underway. His defense
764
00:49:13.239 --> 00:49:15.949
said in a response to the state's alibi demand and
765
00:49:16.010 --> 00:49:19.969
request for a discovery disclosure filed on Friday, adding that
766
00:49:20.389 --> 00:49:24.190
as determinations are made regarding trial evidence, the same will
767
00:49:24.210 --> 00:49:29.070
be timely disclosed. Trial witnesses will be disclosed as determinations
768
00:49:29.139 --> 00:49:32.880
are made. The defense wrote, Mr. Kohlberger does intend to
769
00:49:32.920 --> 00:49:37.099
call individuals named in the state's supply discovery materials. So
770
00:49:37.260 --> 00:49:39.429
what that means is He doesn't plan on calling his
771
00:49:39.489 --> 00:49:42.940
own witnesses. He plans on calling witnesses that are being
772
00:49:42.980 --> 00:49:46.219
brought up by the prosecution. That way his defense can
773
00:49:46.260 --> 00:49:48.219
hammer them. But I think they're going to need to
774
00:49:48.260 --> 00:49:51.400
bring a little more to the party than just that.
775
00:49:51.820 --> 00:49:54.929
Because when all is said and done, just the evidence
776
00:49:54.949 --> 00:49:57.690
that we see here is a mountain high. And can
777
00:49:57.730 --> 00:50:01.590
you imagine what they have behind the scenes? Imagine GPS coordinates.
778
00:50:01.949 --> 00:50:04.789
him connecting to a Wi-Fi router, and all of the
779
00:50:04.849 --> 00:50:07.989
other evidence that has been collected in the aftermath of
780
00:50:08.030 --> 00:50:12.909
these murders, the task before Brian Kohlberger's lawyers is massive.
781
00:50:13.250 --> 00:50:16.050
The question is, are they up for the challenge? And
782
00:50:16.110 --> 00:50:20.309
what strategy do they plan on using? All right, folks,
783
00:50:20.329 --> 00:50:21.929
that's going to do it for this one. All of
784
00:50:21.969 --> 00:50:24.809
the information that goes with the episode can be found
785
00:50:25.159 --> 00:50:26.090
in the description box.