Who Should Correct Science —and How?
Science in the Grey Zone is a podcast dedicated to explore error correction and the intricate pathways of the scientific publishing system.
This is the final episode of our new season, where we interviewed 17 sleuths at the “Scientific literature decontamination” symposium held in Paris in Septembe…
Playing The Hero
Elected officials offer a flood of facts and spin in daily coronavirus briefings. On this week’s On the Media, hear how the press could do a better job separating vital information from messaging. Plus, a look at the unintended consequences of armchair epidemiology. And, how one watchdog journalist…
Episode 81: Retraction
RETRACTED // In this episode of The Studies Show, Tom and Stuart discuss retraction, the process of removing articles from the scientific record. How often is it due to fraud? How many papers get retracted—and is the number increasing? Is it good or bad for a scientist to retract an article? // RE…
Episode 924: Arnie Arnesen Attitude February 24 2026
Part 1:We talk with Michael Beckel, of the Corruption Chronicles.We discuss the various levels of corruption in the administration, and how this affects us all. IssueOne.org is an organization that is building consensus to reduce the influence of money in politics.Part 2:We talk with Ivan Oransky, …
Why Retractions Matter
Hi and welcome to OOTL, the show where we are cool with making mistakes, as long as you correct them. Paper retractions are on the rise, and in today's episode, I spoke to Ivan Oransky, co-founder of Retraction Watch, to find out what is going on and what we can do about it. OOTL will be off next m…
Playing The Hero
Elected officials offer a flood of facts and spin in daily coronavirus briefings. On this week’s On the Media, hear how the press could do a better job separating vital information from messaging. Plus, a look at the unintended consequences of armchair epidemiology. And, how one watchdog journalist…
EA Global: The Replication Crisis (Julia Galef, Stuart Buck, Brian Nosek, Ivan Oransky, and Stephanie Wykstra)
Source: Effective Altruism Global
Sticking Points: Research errors that remain in the record
Not all biomedical research errors are corrected or retracted but some may persist even after retraction in the published literature, shaping research and practice long after concerns arise. In this episode, we speak with Ivan Oransky, co-founder of Retraction Watch, about the most frequent sources…
Can Academic Fraud Be Stopped? (Update)
Probably not — the incentives are too strong. But a few reformers are trying. We check in on their progress, in an update to an episode originally published last year. (Part 2 of 2)
SOURCES:
Max Bazerman, professor of business administration at Harvard Business School.
Leif Nelson, professor of b…
573. Can Academic Fraud Be Stopped?
Probably not — the incentives are too strong. Scholarly publishing is a $28 billion global industry, with misconduct at every level. But a few reformers are gaining ground. (Part 2 of 2)
SOURCES:
Max Bazerman, professor of business administration at Harvard Business School.
Leif Nelson, profess…
PODCAST SØGEMOTOR
Du kan bruge vores hjemmeside til at søge efter3,821,235podcasts og195,346,908episoder efter personer, steder eller emner.
I have no special talent. I am only passionately curious, and
I listen to podcasts.
‐ Albert "Llamacorn" Einstein
REDIG
Tak fordi du hjælper med at holde podcast-databasen opdateret.
