OM DENNE EPISODE
Welcome to the Awkwafina Podcast—where accountability matters, even when certain conservatives would rather ignore it.
In today’s episode, we examine the reaction of Gage Kirby to a predictable and justified outcome: the removal of Damien Tait’s YouTube channel after repeated violations of YouTube’s Terms of Service. Damien did not lose his platform by accident, nor was he singled out unfairly. His account was terminated because he repeatedly harassed and abused others—behavior explicitly prohibited under rules he agreed to when he chose to use YouTube. This was not his first violation, nor his first account loss. It was the result of continued misconduct.
Gage Kirby now claims to be “standing up against bigotry,” yet his own history directly contradicts that claim. For years, Gage has threatened critics, promoted harassment, and defended Damien’s abusive behavior. Despite this, he expresses shock when Damien is finally held accountable. Even more troubling, Gage repeatedly suggests that people who disagree with him—or expose his behavior—deserve abuse, dismissing them as “ignorant” rather than engaging in good-faith discussion.
Gage also appears unwilling or unable to understand a basic principle: actions have consequences. Enforcing platform rules against harassment is not censorship; it is accountability. YouTube enforcing its own policies to prevent cyberbullying is not an act of abuse—it is precisely the opposite. The idea that protecting users is somehow equivalent to silencing victims is a false and dangerous narrative.
Throughout his response, Gage contradicts himself. He claims there is “no reason” to shut down Damien’s channel—then immediately lists the very reasons that justify the shutdown. Rather than expressing remorse for the harm caused, Gage is far more concerned about whether his own channel might face consequences. This reveals not a defense of free speech, but a fear of accountability.
When confronted with the reality of Damien’s violations, Gage shifts blame—promoting conspiracy theories about AI moderation and denying the multiple warnings Damien received. He even acknowledges that Damien’s target, Dusty, was a victim of cyberbullying, only to then blame Dusty for the abuse inflicted upon him. This is classic victim-blaming and reinforces the belief held by both men that harassment “doesn’t hurt anyone”—a claim disproven time and time again.
Gage further undermines his credibility by projecting homophobia, deflecting responsibility, and misunderstanding the limits of free speech. Freedom of speech does not guarantee freedom from consequences, nor does it grant the right to harass, threaten, or dehumanize others on private platforms.
The conclusion is unavoidable: Damien Tait’s channel deserved to be removed, and if Gage Kirby continues the same behavior—harassment, deflection, and refusal to respect rules—he should expect the same outcome. Platforms are not obligated to host abuse, and society is not required to tolerate it.
Until next time—goodbye, and happy new year.
Remember to like, subscribe, participate in our Spotify poll, and support informed discussion.
Sponsored by: Friends of Felines Rescue Center, Defiance, Ohio
