"Pattern Recognition" Is Just Racism With a Spreadsheet | Loomer, the EEOC, and the Ledger They Burned

Thank you to everyone who tuned into my live video! Join me for my next live video in the app.

5 Key Takeaways

* “Pattern recognition” is an 1896 technology, not a 2026 one. Frederick Hoffman’s Race Traits and Tendencies used post 1890 census data to turn the effects of racist law into a “fact” about Black people. Loomer’s line (”some people call it racism, I call it pattern recognition”) is that book in one sentence. The pattern is always built by the people citing it.

* Race is legible for injury and illegible for remedy. On July 21, 2026, Trump’s EEOC voted 2 to 1 to eliminate the EEO1 through EEO6 reports, the only routine federal count of race and sex in the workplace. Five weeks later a presidential advisor listed seven Black women by race and sex and called them ghetto b*****s. They know who to call Black b*****s. They just voted to stop counting who to pay.

* The outrage is not about antisemitism, it’s about 2024. A bipartisan resolution, a New York Times op ed, and a demand for a floor vote on Hasan Piker, a streamer in nobody’s administration. No statement from Josh Gottheimer on Laura Loomer. The resolution is Democratic resentment toward the pro Palestine left with a bill number.

* “Slavery predates capitalism” is fire predating the arsonist. Nobody said capitalism invented slavery. Marx (Capital ch. 31), Williams (1944), Du Bois (1935), and Robinson (1983) said capitalism turned African chattel slavery into the founding stone of a continental economy. Foster and Loomer did the same thing: detach the record from the concept, then declare the concept clean.

* Blame runs to the people with the power. No leftist set the campaign budget, canceled the primary, or refused the Palestinian speaker at the DNC. Either the leftists had the power to decide the election (so their position was popular) or they didn’t (so they aren’t to blame). It’s hot or it’s cold. It can’t be warm.

Education Is Elevation is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Colorblind When You Ask for Justice, 20/20 Vision When They Want to Insult You

Hey, the Chop Up Show was just me and Domo this week, Toya getting her internet fixed, and y’all know when it’s the two of us we ain’t going nowhere fast. For the folks that’s not that familiar, me and Domo come from a policy debate background, we are very well polished in the policymaking process, and we happen to know a theory or ten when it comes to how the world works and how values get inscribed into it. So when the week give us Laura Loomer calling Black women ghetto b*****s, the Democratic Party still arguing about Hasan Piker, Kmele Foster telling Jemele Hill on CNN that slavery predates capitalism, and Abdul El Sayed on The Breakfast Club saying he a capitalist, we don’t get to just react. We got to read.

Now here’s what I want y’all to hold onto while you read, because it’s the throughline and it’s the title. On camera I said it plain: at the same time this administration is telling corporations they need to be colorblind and voting to get rid of the demographic data that we use to prove discrimination, one of their own advisors is going around calling people Black b*****s. They know who to call Black b*****s, though. Feel me? That’s not a contradiction. That’s the design. Race is legible when the state wants to injure you and illegible when you want a remedy. You can be seen well enough to be called ghetto and not seen well enough to be counted. Same eyes. Same week.

Then the second half of the show, the capitalism half, is the same move with a different costume. Kmele Foster told Jemele Hill that slavery is older than writing so it can’t be bound up with capitalism. The Democratic establishment tells you the leftists cost Kamala the election while the people who ran the campaign get to be an act of reason. Every one of these is the same technology: detach the record from the concept, keep the verdict, burn the ledger. Read the pattern, destroy the receipts. That’s the whole essay. Everything below is just the receipts they hoping you don’t pull.

What She Actually Said, With Dates

Let’s start with the clip, because a lot of folks heard about it and didn’t sit with it.

On Friday, August 28, 2026, Laura Loomer, a far right activist and a Trump ally who is widely described as an informal advisor, somebody who is documented, or alleged depending on who you ask, to show up at the White House and when she leave, decisions is made and people is fired, posted a video on X naming five Black women: Florida Democratic Senate nominee Angie Nixon, Representatives Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley, former Representative Cori Bush, and Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. She wrote that they were all “ghetto, entitled, race obsessed, destructive black B*****S who are completely unfit for the power they hold.” She used the slur five times in one post. In the clip we played on the show she went further down the line: Fani Willis, Jasmine Crockett, Candace Owens, Wes Moore, and then the line that’s the reason this essay exists. “Are you starting to see a pattern here? Some people call it racism. I call it pattern recognition. And guess what? Pattern recognition and profiling keeps you safe.”

The trigger, for the record, was Nixon’s floor speech against resolutions honoring Charlie Kirk. Loomer called her a “ghetto black communist b***h,” mocked her speech as “Ebonics,” and said she needed her “leash” tugged. When the backlash came she doubled down on Sunday: “Is she ghetto? Yes. Is she black? Yes. Is she a communist? Yes. I spoke the truth.” By that week she had run the same exact sentence at Representative LaMonica McIver. Marjorie Taylor Greene, of all people, said she “1000 percent” denounced it and called it racist. Ben Crump, Wes Moore, Ro Khanna, and Charlamagne’s Donkey of the Day all lined up. Nixon, who had just scored an upset win in Florida’s Democratic Senate primary, answered on X: “When referring to me, it’s Representative Angie Nixon. However, after November 3rd, YOU CAN CALL ME SENATOR!”

So that’s the record. Now hold it next to the rest of what she said, because the framing is doing more work than the slur. Before she got to “ghetto black b*****s,” she said, and I’m quoting the clip: “If you are offended by stereotypes, then maybe, just maybe, you need to start policing your own community. If I don’t want people thinking that all Jews are a bunch of globalists, maybe I should be calling out the progressive Jews who are funding radical left causes. That’s what I do. I self police the Jewish community.” Then: “It’s time for other Black people to start policing the Black community.”

Every accusation is a confession, y’all. She told you exactly what she is. She is a police. She polices her own community for the benefit of the people who hate her community, and she is asking Black people to become deputies in the same department. That’s the ask. The slur is just the uniform.

Pattern Recognition Is the Oldest Word for Racism With a Spreadsheet

Most of y’all heard “pattern recognition” and heard a tech word, a 2026 word, something a Silicon Valley MF say about AI. Nah. That word is from 1896.

Apply Muhammad here. In The Condemnation of Blackness, Khalil Gibran Muhammad traces how, right after the 1890 census, the first census to sort prisoners by race in a way that let people build a national argument, a Prudential Insurance statistician named Frederick L. Hoffman published Race Traits and Tendencies of the American Negro. Hoffman took arrest and mortality data, stripped it of every condition that produced it (convict leasing, vagrancy statutes, all white juries, no doctors, no sewers), and presented the raw number as a racial trait. Black people were not being arrested more because the law was built to arrest them. Black people were criminal, look at the pattern. Muhammad’s whole book is about how that statistical move became the common sense of the twentieth century, ho…